Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Key to the Defense, Take Two: Improved Pass Rush

Schobel needs some help

In the first year under defensive coordinator Perry Fewell, the Bills' defense adjusted well to a brand new defensive scheme based on the famed "Tampa 2" defense. This new scheme was much different than anything the Bills have run in recent years - lighter, faster defenders were brought in to replace strong, meaty ones. Players had to adjust to new roles at their positions. Overall, the transition was pretty smooth.

Despite that success, the Bills still have plenty of weak areas. The team's run defense, in general, was pretty bad. The team gave up a lot of big plays through the air as well. A third problem area was third down defense - Buffalo often could not get off the field, leading to extended drives for the opposition. An improved pass rush would help to solve all three problems.

Sacking a Cover 2 "Must-Do"
The one thing Buffalo really lacks is a premiere pass rushing threat. Sure, Aaron Schobel went to the Pro Bowl last year after registering 14 take-downs, but he is not mistaken by anyone as an explosive edge rusher; he is merely a guy who doesn't give up on plays and gets a lot of sacks that way. The team finished with 37.5 sacks total, which admittedly is not a low number. However, the numbers behind Schobel's 14 are unimpressive, at best: Ryan Denney registered 6 (three in one game against Miami, if you recall), Chris Kelsay had 5.5, and Larry Tripplett finished fourth with just two and a half. Those numbers aren't exactly going to scare offensive coordinators into taking double teams away from Schobel.

Cover 2 defenses thrive on getting pressure on the quarterback. Pressure leads to hurried throws, and against a zone defense, hurried throws get intercepted. Without a consistent pass rush (note: consistent is the key word there), quarterbacks and receivers have the necessary time to find holes in the zone and exploit even the most talented of defensive backfields. Too many times in '06, quarterbacks had all day to sit and wait for a receiver to find a hole.

Cover 2 Sack Artists: A Rich History
Some of the league's most feared pass rushers of recent years evolved from an aggressive Cover 2 scheme. Simeon Rice and Warren Sapp wreaked havoc on quarterbacks when the two played for Tampa Bay. Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis are lethal edge rushers for the Super Bowl Champion Colts. Practically the entirety of the Chicago Bears' defensive line fits the bill. Heck, even Jared Allen has become a household name thanks to Herm Edwards' Cover 2 scheme in Kansas City.

Outside of Schobel, the Bills do not have a pass rush threat that opposing offenses need to pay attention to on every play. That limits the effectiveness of Schobel. While Kelsay, Denney and even Anthony Hargrove played effectively, none are the sack artist threat that Buffalo really needs. They all can play effectively, sure, but none present the explosion and burst off the edge that all good Cover-2 defenses have.

More Blitzing in '07?
Having a better pass rush will increase the effectiveness of the entire defense - defensive tackles, linebackers and the secondary included. More importantly, however, is this: a second year in Fewell's scheme may allow the coaching staff to take more chances on defense by sending blitzes.

With two young safeties in Donte Whitner and Ko Simpson last year, the Bills were extremely hesitant to send blitzes - it would have left the young defenders in a highly dangerous situation. With a year under their belt, however, the Bills may be more comfortable in sending linebackers and nickel/dime backs on the occasional blitz. That would also help create a more consistent pass rush for the Cover 2 scheme.

One way or another, the front office has to understand that if the defense is going to truly dominate, a better, more consistent pass rush is sorely needed.

0 recs  |  Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The most important part of a Cover 2
is a GM understanding what type of player works in it.  I think if you take at least half of the players who currently thrive in the Cover-2, they aren't nearly as successful elsewhere.  

Of course, a good athlete is good regardless, but you can get away with having guys in the secondary that aren't straight up good corner backs.

by WCG on May 16, 2007 10:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re:
Agreed, WCG - you're seeing Indy follow that philosophy.  Letting Harper and David go proves that corners aren't nearly as high a priority in this system.

But they can get away with it, because their front four can get consistent pressure on the quarterback.  Not sure Buffalo's there yet.

Buffalo Rumblings: we are awesome.

by Brian Galliford on May 16, 2007 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Always comes down to the front 4
my CBs don't have to be great, but if we aren't getting pressure and you let a tandem like Harrison and Wayne get going you are going to get trashed.

We will be trying that theory, probably next year.  We aren't likely to extend Tillman and Vashar.

by WCG on May 17, 2007 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The pass rush
The pass rush was something I had been hoping we'd address after the season.  I was harping on it all season as a necessary component of the Cover 2 and soon after it ended.  Then we went out and resigned Chris Kelsay to a very sizeable deal.

Don't get me wrong, Kelsay is a solid DE who normally gets the job done, but he is not a pass rush threat and is not worth the $$$ he received because of that.  He's pretty decent against the run, but those type of guys generally don't get pass rusher DE money. Why we were so high on him still baffles me. He had HALF a sack after the bye week last year and was completely non-existent as our run D got even worse. I'm still questioning this resigning, or at least the money involved. But that's over with so we have to deal with what we've got.

I agree with you on Schobel being a good, but not great pass rusher.  He's so terribly inconsistent. He'll have one game where he's a terror, but go another few before being heard from again.  In this D we need him to constantly put pressure on the QB and despite his 14 sacks, he wasn't as consistent as we need. I hesitate to place blame on him because we need more than just one pass rusher.  If we had a good rusher opposite him, we would be so much better.

Ever since I heard we were going to run the Cover 2, I was hoping we'd bring in a speed rusher (like a Mathis or Mark Anderson), but it's be neglected and we continue to plug away with average pass rushers.  It's also time for our DT's to start applying more pressure up the middle. How often did we see QB's just sitting back there with all day to throw because we couldn't bring any kind of pressure with the front 4?  Too much, IMO.

If we can somehow start generating more of a rush, our young secondary will have a much better chance to succeed.  

I do believe we'll see more blitzing as well.  Poz and Whitner seem like prime candidates for that.  Let's hope we can bring more pressure this year because we'll need it, especially if the run D isn't improved all that much...

~K

by Kurupt on May 16, 2007 12:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yahoo! DE Rankings
Yahoo's Defensive End Rankings posit that the Bills' pass-rushing duo of Aaron Schobel and Chris Kelsay are the sixth-best duo in the AFC. The good news? That's only one spot lower than the Mathis/Freeney duo in Indianapolis, who are easily the AFC's best Cover-2 duo. The bad news? The Bills' pass-rushers rank behind three teams who play a 3-4 (NE, BAL, SD).

I think this speaks volumes to the discussions we've been having here today - we're obviously ranked in the top half of the AFC, but everyone knows the truly dominant D-Ends are in the NFC (Peppers, Strahan, Kearse, Ogunleye, Rice, Will Smith, Alex Brown, Kampman, Little, Kerney, need I go on?)

Just goes to show that the Bills need more explosion at the position.

Buffalo Rumblings: we are awesome.

by Brian Galliford on May 16, 2007 8:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Any relevent feedback would be nice
Nfl-toronto_small
some thoughts
Images_small
Bills Quarterbacks
279px-buffalo_bills_logo_svg_small
To be or Not to be?
T_edwards_070930_gallery_600_1__small
The 1st Thing Buffalo Should Do This Offseason
Small
You would think Jacksonville would move before Buffalo.
Small
Thanks Bills Fans (from a Jag fan)
Daffy_duck_small
As the merry-go-round turns: Bills coaching rumors and more
Billsjaguars_small
Inactive Thoughts: Week 10
Buffalo_bills-1_small
CFB's returning mind dump

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Buc 'Em
Maybe it's best to keep that game film on the shelf
Field Gulls
Monday Night Football Thread
Arrowhead Pride
Haley Defends Chiefs Fans in Terrible Towel Filled Home Game

Editor-in-Chief

Ronswanson_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Billsjaguars_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Nfl-toronto_small kaisertown