Monday Night Heartache, Take Two: Bills fall to Browns
In what can only be described as one of the ugliest and sloppiest football games that I have witnessed in recent memory, the Buffalo Bills lost their second straight Monday Night Football contest, this time succumbing to the Cleveland Browns 29-27. The Bills, once 5-1 on the season, now find themselves 5-5, losers of their last four games, and dead least in the AFC East - a division they led just a month ago.
Despite some terrific individual efforts from RB Marshawn Lynch (33 touches, 177 yards, TD), CB Leodis McKelvin (stellar DB work, kick return for a score) and others, the Bills could not overcome four turnovers, which included three first-quarter interceptions from the sinking ship that is Trent Edwards. Despite the downfalls, Cleveland did their best to keep the Bills in the game, which they did - but a Rian Lindell missed field goal in the final minute sealed Buffalo's fate.
First of all - calm down
I know what you're thinking. "Fire Dick Jauron!" "Trent Edwards sucks!" "Turk Schonert is a moron!" "This team plays with no heart!" "Waaaaaaah!"
Just stop it. Seriously. Just. Stop. It.
As has been the case in their three previous losses, Buffalo lost this game because it made mistakes. No, the coaching hasn't been perfect. Yes, the play has largely been terrible. Yes, it's irritating to watch this team repeatedly lose games they can win. I challenge you all to avoid being the bandwagon fan.
I'm not asking you to be a front-runner, or even be obnoxiously positive - obviously, this team doesn't deserve the latter. But when times are tough, the majority of fans have the admirable, yet silly, notion that pointing out every miniature problem and offering radical solutions to them will provide that "insta-change". It rarely works. We're fans of this team for a reason. So before you sing "woe is me" and let your fingers tap-dance in obscenities, cliches and "Fire Dick Jauron!", understand that things take time. I don't care how (im)patient you are; they do. I've said my piece on this and won't say any more; I just think some of the reactions around here are ludicrous. Flame away. I can take the heat.
Holy adjustments, Kornheiser
After Edwards threw three picks in the first quarter, offensive coordinator Turk Schonert confounded both fans and the Browns alike by making an adjustment. That adjustment? He ran the ball. Despite the four turnovers, Buffalo still dominated in time of possession while racking up 186 rushing yards on the night - easily their best rushing performance of the season.
Meanwhile, the Bills were able to find a pass rush tonight - against a pretty good Browns offensive line, no less. No, it's still not consistent, but it was enough to force Brady Quinn into completing just 39 percent of his passes. It's a step in the right direction for this defense, who once again was left in some tight spots and acquitted themselves nicely in a "kept us in it" performance.
Don't even get me started on Buffalo's special teams - these guys are back, Lindell's gaffe aside. (For the record, I never left the "I don't trust Rian Lindell" bandwagon). Still want to call Leodis McKelvin a bust? If not for Lynch and the ever-annoying Phil Dawson, McKelvin was the best player on the field tonight.
What this team needs
No! I'm not going to say "head coaching change", "scheme change", "coordinator change", or any of those common notions. Y'all have that well-covered. No, what Buffalo needs are some difference-makers. Guys to lean on. Buffalo is a star-less team, and it's become painfully apparent over the past month that they need a couple of stars.
Right now, Buffalo is leaning too hard on Edwards, and the kid is crumbling under the pressure. He's forcing passes; he's antsy; his confidence is shot. Schonert was smart to take the ball out of his hands as often as he did in the second half; we even saw flashes of the "old" Trent when he hit a beautiful seam route to Robert Royal to set up Lindell's crap-fest kick. I still maintain that Edwards is going to be a very good player (I swear, if I hear "J.P. Losman" this week, I'm putting my foot up an arse).
Especially defensively, the Bills don't have that guy to get them out of tight spots. The Dwight Freeney, Troy Polamalu, or Ray Lewis type - guys who get the job done when their teammates expect them to. The Bills are a team of average, to above average, to very good players. They don't have any great ones - not yet, anyways. That's far easier to remedy than starting over from scratch. Great players make great coaches and great teams. Right now, Buffalo is stuck at "average"; they started the season at "very good". Don't expect much to change (no, not even in the coaching staff, believe it or not) until we can find those guys to lean on.
Game Balls
I'm breaking my rule and giving one to Lynch, even though the Bills lost. He played out of his mind tonight - Cleveland couldn't tackle the guy. He was awesome.
Roll Call
National TV makes record-breaking game threads here at Rumblings; monumental collapses don't hurt that cause, either. 2,091 comments were made this evening, and while not all of them were what I would consider "koshier" (man, some of you guys swear like sailors - not cool, folks), I'll let it slide for tonight considering the nature of the game. Just try to keep it under control in the future. We're not Kissing Suzy Kolber or Deadspin.
Props to norcaliangelsfan for pacing the nerds with 289 comments; Monstarr_716 also popped in with an incredibly respectful 279. MattRichWarren (271), Kurupt (260) and Joe P (168) also had impressive outings. Good on all 45 of you who stopped by.
norcaliangelsfan, Kurupt, fletcherjd, MonStarr_716, jwest529, sireric, Ron From NM, keuka121, Joe P., Cinga, MattRichWarren, chaosthepitbull, SebastianPruiti, garycoleman69, prbillsfan, Zumone, Thoroughbred, BearsNecessity, silverstreak3k, WABillsfan, MARVelous, Kumario!, tomsbills, TimEllis, BILLS, smokin4gnomes, TheK-GunNeedsReloaded, BillsNorth, Teaters33, NJBill, grenoire, Phinja305, TheAfghanTwilight, ccthemovieman, poz, LeClaireBill, NJBillsfan, jri111, ChrisPokorny, lefty6283, schobes44, LGB, StuckInNJ, tiimbitz4786, Hopefulcynic
0 recs |
139 comments
|
Comments
By the way Brian, were you the guy dressed as Chewbacca? K thinks you had ESPN carved into your chest pelt
Anyhow, onto your post:
Marshawn and the STs went way above and beyond tonight to keep our team in it. And as I noted before, asking Lindell for anything past the 40-45 range is just asking for trouble, we gambled and lost big time on that one.
Turk did adjust and he did run the ball more, more than any of us could guess, and it was nice to see our fatties pushing the Browns backwards, that was nice to see. My issue with Turk was that when Cleveland began to sell out on the run, we didn’t use PA to truly make them pay. As you noted Trent start coming alive near the end there, and he was doing well after getting a 2 quarter breather. We need to keep relying on his arm to win the game and just slug it out on the ground, that is if the OLine keeps making holes and Marshawn can stay in one piece till the end of the season. But I am officially worried now about Trent and Turk Brian, I don’t like seeing my QB fall apart on the field and Turk did have a small hand in that by having him throw so often in the 1st from what I’ve read so far.
Coaching change will not come, as much as K, jri, or I would like, but then again Brian, at some point we may need to look into it, but till the season is dead and buried with both feet sticking up we gotta run with what we got.
McKelvin played very well as I have said before, and I think we will have a bit of an issue in a couple of seasons if we somehow resign Greer this offseason, he could make McGee potentially expendable down the road. Also, it was a shame Youbuty was out today, he would have stuck Brady on the CB blitz that Corner missed on, but thats a lot to ask of a 4th Round CB who has barely seen the field till the past 2 weeks.
What were your thoughts on Steven Johnson today btw? He looked mighty good at finding the soft spots in the Cleveland secondary, your thoughts from within the stadium?
As for Stars to lean on, well, that may take some time to for us to get some either through FA or to draft them. But if we do not have stars we cannot have any slack off from the Coaches in that situation then Brian, not one bit. If Football is made up of 4 critical pieces like in a reciepe: Offense, Defense, STs, and Coaching and for the three player portions we are missing key ingredients, or the ingredients are a little past their sell buy date, we need that 4 piece to really take up the slack, and it hasn’t exactly been doing that recently.
I’ll take whatever flames your willing to send my way in my post buddy, just glad we all have a place where we can give our opinions, have them respected, and not take it to heart.
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on Nov 18, 2008 3:17 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Note, was thinking to much ahead when writing this section
We need to keep from relying on his arm to win the game and just slug it out on the ground, that is if the OLine keeps making holes and Marshawn can stay in one piece till the end of the season.
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on Nov 18, 2008 3:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha, no, no Chewie costume for me, and I’m one of those pansy-men who have no chest hair to begin with. Plus, it was effing FREEZING last night, so there was no way in hell I’d even attempt something like that if I had the goods. :)
Agreed on Turk and play action. He didn’t take advantage of the run game that was FINALLY established. Baby steps, I guess…
Steve looked OK, but I disagree that he looked “mighty good” at finding soft spots. He caught 3 passes; Marshawn Lynch caught 10. That should tell you how often Stevie was open. Kid’s got a future, but he’s not a guy to lean on yet.
You know my thoughts on coaching. I had no problems with the way the team played last night in terms of energy levels. I thought Perry Fewell called a good game. I just mentioned my thoughts on Turk, which echo yours. Other than the fact that the Bills can’t seem to stop turning the ball over like they’re handing our Christmas gifts, I had no problem with anything else last night.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 9:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A view from above
As someone who sat higher in the stadium than many others did…there were plenty of open receivers all night and Trent didn’t find them. Let’s wait and hear what Lee Evans will say about last night because he was in the tunnel before the game ended. He appeared upset on the field numerous times because he was open down field and didn’t get the ball.
Marshawn caught so many balls because it appeared that Trent was afraid to throw down field after throwing three picks. Many of the dump offs to Lynch were not called screen plays but instead safe dump offs. I don’t know what they have to do in order for Trent to become confident again but if they don’t do something, we will be calling for another backup to take over in two years.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Nov 18, 2008 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the worst part
was that he had very little pressure on him all night, so even while the Browns dropped so many into coverage Trent had all day to look for an open reciever. Unfortunatley he seems to be so ratled and gun shy that he couldn’t make a play longer than 10 yards(until he hit royal).
Jouron should have sat him down for at least a couple of series. He was just so obviously BAD!
This loss was entirely Edwards fault.
by jimkutica on Nov 18, 2008 2:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sitting Edwards isn’t the answer there. He needs to play through it. He also needs to be put in a better position to succeed. It’s time for the Joe Flacco offense in Buffalo.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Brian nice write up........
I’ll admit my language got out of hand….I’ll keep it in check in the future, so you have my apologies…….
Frustrating game…..without a doubt…..but the growing pains are hopefully coming to end…..hopefully….I honestly dont know what to say about this game besides the fact that its a typical Buffalo Bills game on the big national stage…..they do just enough to give you hope, but in the end heartache is your end reward.
The OL bounced back -(not sure if it was because of only 3-4 guys on the line as everyone else was dropping into pass coverage or because they got fed up with getting abused) but that second half offense is what needs to be seen week in week out………minus the turnovers of course…..
It obvious the team needs to address the Defensive End and Center positions because those two are obvious weak links (Preston pretty much got abused on every other play, yet again) and it seemed like the only real pressure came from LB’s or DB’s on blitzes…..
Defense played great, sans the one TD run……gotta get our injuried guys back healthy (hopefully Jabari is okay)
I have faith that Trent will get straightened out…..because….well……there is no other choice…We as fans are gonna live or die with number 5 at the helm…..and right now….we’re on life support.
Disappointment proves that expectations were mistaken.......ladies and gentlemen your 2008 Buffalo Bills.....
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 18, 2008 3:19 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I said it pre-game and I’ll stand by it for now – Trent’s going to be fine. You’re going to hear a lot of garbage this week about how he can’t read defenses; don’t buy it. Few NFL quarterbacks can pick apart 8-man coverage; Cleveland dared Trent to pick them apart, and it’s not surprising he couldn’t. Turk did the right thing to take advantage of Cleveland’s strategy with the draw, and Trent had a little more success as the game went on. That throw he had to Rob to set up Lindell’s FG miss was an outstanding throw.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 9:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Bills are average
I’m not a lets fire the coaches, get a new qb, instant change, etc. etc etc. guy. Nor am I a bandwagon fan. And I’m in complete agreement that we need some impact players. I have been saying that for awhile. However, when is enough, enough? I’m not saying it is right now, this season, or even next or the next season. But at some point it will occur.
The Bills are an average football team. 7-9, 7-9, 5-5 (so far) is what they are. And when you have a guy like Dick Jauron who has so much say in player decisions (drafting, free agents, injuried reserve) he just has to be more accountable than other head coaches around the league. Donte Whitner is not an impact player. I’m sorry, he’s not. He may be a great leader and have everyone over for dinner, but for #8 overall? Sorry. John McCargo? Enough said. Lynch? Unbelievable heart, played great last night. A luxury first round pick for a team that couldn’t afford one. James Hardy and Chris Ellis? WAY to early, but not getting on the field is not a good sign. I know that is glass half empty and you can say Edwards, Peters, Greer, Poz etc. Which is completely valid and true.
I guess I just feel like the Bills have built an average football team and I’m struggling with reasons as to why that is going to change?
by Tasker89 on Nov 18, 2008 10:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because the team is going to change. I fully anticipate the Bills beefing up the trenches this off-season. If that happens, and it’s done with worthwhile players (and we get a DE that doesn’t suck), this team could be above average.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 11:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
already looking ahead?
our defense looked spectacular last night. As in the game against New England our defense was stout and kept us in the game the entire game. Our offense needs to pick up the slack. We were winning when Trent wasn’t turning the ball over; we have a playoff caliber defense, if our offense just holds on to the ball we win last night.
As for lacking a defensive player to lean on how can you ignore the effort by Kawika Mitchell last night to fire up this team. He was all over Brady Quinn, rushing his throws, hitting him, shooting past their o-line. He counts as someone to lean on to me. He steps up when no one else will.
I’m not optimistic, any real hope inside me was crushed last night. BUT and this is a huge BUT. If the team that showed up in the 2nd half shows up normally the Bills have a schedule up coming in which they should win every single game. We’re not going to make the playoffs in all likelihood but the Bills destiny is in their own hands. All winnable games on the schedule. If they can collapse they can at least try to pull off a miracle. Yuck. I feel sick.
McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year
by poz on Nov 18, 2008 12:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t call our defense “spectacular” last night. They did enough to win. But the Browns still put up 29.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 2:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah but with four turnovers it could have been so much worse...
by MattRichWarren on Nov 18, 2008 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt. 29 is 29, though, and the Browns put together a couple of nice drives.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Problems
Edwards is inexperienced and will learn. I’m going to keep telling that to myself until I actually accept it as the explanation for his poor play AGAINST THE BROWNS. This also applies to why Schonert only recently discovered Marshawn Lynch.
I don’t know how relevant it was tonight, but our C situation is still worse than abysmal.
I’m not worried about CB with our young talent, but it’s still a bit away, and there is no excuse for Brady Quinn getting away with 1 sack and no INT.
Instead I’m going to blame our troubles there on our DEs, or lack thereof.
When Schobel and Whitner return, I want to see them play possessed. I want Reed to return and play well, but I want those two to pick up the team and carry it.
by Hopefulcynic on Nov 18, 2008 3:26 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Holy crap over at the BBMB its turned into a JP Losman love fest.....
I guess most bills fans over there have a short memory.
Disappointment proves that expectations were mistaken.......ladies and gentlemen your 2008 Buffalo Bills.....
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 18, 2008 4:11 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ha. Shocking.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 9:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Now that's just scary.
John Madden told me 90% of the game was half-mental...
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Nov 18, 2008 12:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The thing that got to me
last night was that it never really hit me on how young this team actually is…there were like 3 plays in a row where 3 different rookies were called out and I was like wow these are just kids right now…they just need to grow and growing pains suck….but I see this team being very competative
by Lion Alum on Nov 18, 2008 7:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I wish Schonert would have started off running the ball instead of leaving Edwards out to dry again. running the ball after 3 int’s is hardly an adjustment. I think the ol, with some reps, actually were able to get into a groove and it showed. that should be the blueprint going forward, Lynch getting 20-25 carries and Jackson with 10+ carries.
Edwards has completely lost all confidence he gained earlier this year. he’s not throwing the ball before receivers break, instead waiting for them to get open which is usually too late. let’s run the ball and let trent manage the game.
by gatornation on Nov 18, 2008 8:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Precisely. Spot on. Amen. Other “you’re right” adjective phrases. :)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 9:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that the Bills biggest problem is a lack of difference making talent. Do we have one player on the entire team (punters don’t count) who is one of the 10 best players in the league at his position? I guess Marshawn? Is anyone else all that close? The Bills need a superstar or two and until we find those guys we will never be an elite team. it is easy to blame the coaches for our inability to look like the Giants or Steelers, but those teams simply have better players than we do.
by kaisertown on Nov 18, 2008 8:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Players reflect the Coaches
I tend to think more down the line that the players reflect the abilities and spirit of their coaches to bring out their best.
The biggest evidence of that is right in our own division, the Miami Dolphins. They have done more to improve in one year than the Bills have in the last 5 years. And it wasn’t because of this amazing influx of talent. It was all changes at the top. The same could be said for the Jets. How is it that they can go from 4-12 to leading the division. Now there I think they did bring in alot of talent, but it was the people at the top who knew who to bring in and how to get the talent to perform.
There are plenty of playmakers on this team. I think the staff is just a 7-9 type of staff.
by south123 on Nov 18, 2008 8:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Then we are going to have to agree to disagree. I know that it is the coaches job to get the most out of their players, but what I think the Bills are missing is an elite player. The best players in the league would be the best players for any coach. The Bills don’t have anyone on their team who would be a true star (top 5-10 player in the league at their position) and none of their players would be that guy on a different team or with a different staff.
And the Dolphins lost 7 games last year by 3 points despite the worst QB play in the league. I think Chad Pennington is such a boost at the most important position that the Dolphins had to improve with that alone. Everyone really should have seen this coming and in hindsight, we all should have picked the Dolphins to win about 8 games.
by kaisertown on Nov 18, 2008 9:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We have a couple elite players
Evans and Lynch – both these guys could be top ten at their positions. Lynch doesn’t get the ball because Schonert is calling a finesse game. Evans doesn’t get the ball because Edwards’ bell is apparently still ringing.
South123 has a point about coaching – that is often where attitude starts with. There are cases of veterans leading with attitude, but I can’t really think of any fiery veterans who have been on the team a while who could offer that. The players with fire in them are only a few years in the league. The leading vets are free agent pickups.
Ultimately, we don’t play with Elite attitude. Take a look at the Titans, or the Giants, the Steelers. Those are teams with swagger – they expect to win everytime they step on the field and you can see it the way they carry themselves. We don’t have that.
People are too concerned about being Goodell’s model team.
Its that Ivy league mellowness. Playing this like a gentleman’s game where the outcome doesn’t really matter – its the way you play the game. NONSENSE.
Gimme some anger, gimme some urgency. Gimme some playoffs.
by oompaloompa on Nov 18, 2008 9:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
elite
those teams have “swagger” cuz they are 10-0, 9-1, 7-3. They are super physical teams. They have developed a formula over time and have built great rosters. Don’t tell me about all this coaching crap. At the end of the day players have to look in the mirror and ask 1 question “how good do I want to be?” If you have a roster full of players that are willing to go the extra mile, lead by example, then that carries over. IF you have players that are just happy to be collecting a check then you have issues. It’s a culture of accountability. If anything, I think Jauron needs to threaten people for their jobs more to scare some people not pulling their weight (OL, DE’s, TE’s)
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Nov 18, 2008 9:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
swagger
remember we were 5-1? I didn’t see swagger. In fact all I heard was people fretting about getting ahead of ourselves, or jinxing it.
i live down state so have seen a lot of the giants and jets. the giants, even when they are down, have swagger – something about that organization. the jets on the other hand are always the stepchild, always the inferiority complex. its all anecdotal, but which team has been more successful?
my comment about the ivy league is a jab at jauron. i absolutely agree jauron needs to start threatening people. my point is that he doesn’t do anything like that. he’s got that attitude like its a friendly meet between Harvard and Yale for bragging rights so that when we’re all grown up and investment bankers we can rib each other over martinis.
by oompaloompa on Nov 18, 2008 10:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the giants, even when they are down, have swagger – something about that organization.
I’m guessing it was because they won the Super Bowl last year. That will give a team some confidence.
the jets on the other hand are always the stepchild, always the inferiority complex. its all anecdotal, but which team has been more successful?
Obviously the Giants have a long history, but over the last decade, the Giants only have four more regular season (and one Super Bowl) victories. The difference between the two teams hasn’t been that wide.
by kaisertown on Nov 18, 2008 10:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the oompaloompa
I live in CT and I have to agree that the Giants always expect to be 16-0 even when they suck. I mean, they fully expected to beat the Patriots last year, and they looked like crap at the start of the season. I think it has to do with arrogance of the NFC East, they always think its the toughest division in football.
by south123 on Nov 18, 2008 10:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
thank you South
as long as I can remember, the Giants have had swagger, not just this year and last. just the same, the Jets – they’ve always been the team with the inferiority complex. maybe it has to do with being the undercard in their own home stadium.
anyway, another example, its like the yankees and mets in baseball. the yankees expect to win 110 games a year even with the awful rosters they’ve been putting together the last few years, the mets just hope to be good.
you can’t put your finger on it – its just something as intangible as an aura.
its an attitude that just projects “THIS IS MY HOUSE – I OWN YOU.”
people have been pointing this out about the Bills the last few weeks that they are just playing not to lose, instead of playing to win.
by oompaloompa on Nov 18, 2008 2:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i absolutely agree jauron needs to start threatening people. my point is that he doesn’t do anything like that.
How on earth can you possibly claim to have this knowledge? We have no idea who Dick Jauron threatens and doesn’t, but I don’t think he’s as laid-back as the populace makes him out to be.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 11:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough
but where there is smoke there is fire, or rather, if no smoke, probably no fire. the bills, in general, don’t impress me that they are playing with fire. i sense more frustration than anything else.
by oompaloompa on Nov 18, 2008 2:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think he can threaten guys for their starting spots because we don’t exactly have great depth behind our subpar starters at those positions.
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 11:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Lee Evans isn’t a top 10 WR. I’m not sure he is even all that close. I wouldn’t put him in the same class as guys like Andre Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, Anquan Boldin, Calvin Johnson, Randy Moss and Roddy White. I don’t think he is as good as guys like Brandon Marshall, Greg Jennings, Steve Smith, Plaxico Burress, Reggie Wayne or TJ Houshmandzadeh. Really, is Evans any better than Hines Ward, Santana Moss, Santonio Holmes, Wes Welker, TO, Braylon Edwards, Jerrico Cotchery, Torry Holt, Roy Williams, Dwayne Bowe, a healthy Chad Johnson or even Bernard Berrian? I don’t see why Bills fans think he is elite. I’m not trying to start some is Lee Evans good argument because I love the guy and he is a great player, just not elite.
Marshawn might be one of the ten best RBs in the league, but in a league with just 32 starters and a stud like Adrian Peterson as well as some really talented guys like Frank Gore, Marian Barber, Michael Turner, LT, Brandon Jacobs, Clinton Portis, MJD and Brian Westbrook, is Lynch really all that special? Again, I don’t want to start a debate about exactly how good Marshawn is, or where does he rank vs. other runners, but we can certainly all agree that he isn’t in the same class as Peterson and therefore, isn’t THAT elite.
I think the swagger comes with talent and not the other way around. You mention the Titans, but they have 3 players on defense (Haynesworth, Bullock, Vanden Bosch) who are better than any player on the Bills defense. I think a stud like Troy Polomalu or James Harrison playing together with guys like Casey Hampton (another team that has 3 players who are better than anyone on the Bills D), LaMarr Woodley, Aaron Smith and James Farrior brings more swagger than any coach EVER could. I think the Giants run game is talent first a swagger second too. Chris Snee is probably the best player currently playing right guard in the entire league and they are above average at every other spot on the O-Line too. Put Snee and Shuan O’Hara in the middle of the Bills OL and you might see us run with more “toughness” every game regardless of whether or not the coaches even notice if the team is on the field. I think it takes elite talent to play with elite attitude and the Bills just don’t have elite talent.
People are too concerned about being Goodell’s model team.
If Goodell scared the Bills, we wouldn’t have drafted Marshawn Lynch or James Hardy. The Bills might put too much emphasis on character, but I don’t think it is at all related to Roger Goodell.
by kaisertown on Nov 18, 2008 10:20 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
WOW
you don’t think your are stretching your argument just a bit by saying he isn’t as good as Bernard Berrian?
McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year
by poz on Nov 18, 2008 12:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Really, is Evans any better than Hines Ward, Santana Moss, Santonio Holmes, Wes Welker, TO, Braylon Edwards, Jerrico Cotchery, Torry Holt, Roy Williams, Dwayne Bowe, a healthy Chad Johnson or even Bernard Berrian?
I meant to point out that Evans isn’t much better than Berrian. And if you aren’t that much better than Bernard Berrian, you are not an elite player. I think that the gap between Evans and the elite guys like Andre Johnson and Larry Fitzgerald is considerably bigger than the gap between Evans and Berrian.
Berrian 2007 – 71 catches – 951 yards – 5 TDs
Berrian 2008 – 33 catches – 667 yards – 4 TDs
Evans 2007 – 55 catches – 849 yards – 5 TDs
Evans 2008 – 37 catches – 700 yards – 3 TDs
Is it really a stretch to say Evans and Berrian are close to equal players?
by kaisertown on Nov 18, 2008 12:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We’ve visited that comparison before. Evans has better hands than Berrian, but they are very comparable players.
I thought Evans and Roddy White were a good comparison too, but it’s obvious White is quite the stud while Evans is a level or two below that.
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 1:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
why?
because Roddy White has a QB now who gets him the ball? The problem isn’t Lee Evans its his quarterbacks.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Nov 18, 2008 2:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
White did just fine last year with Chris Redmon, Joey Harrington and Byron Leftwich shuffling in and out from week to week and often right in the middle of games.
by kaisertown on Nov 18, 2008 2:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
thats
even worse for our quarterbacks, its saying a lot about them. Evans was pissed at the end of the game because Trent refused to throw the ball downfield unless it was a pick. Receivers cant make plays if the QB only dumps it off. I still believe in Trent but he looks scared out there.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Nov 18, 2008 2:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Roddy White is an excellent player. He makes plays all over the field and has really developed into a guy that goes up and gets it.
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There are cases of veterans leading with attitude, but I can’t really think of any fiery veterans who have been on the team a while who could offer that
Kawika Mitchell has that attitude. Unfortunately, nobody seems to take his cue out there…..
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 11:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, but he's a free agent pick up
in my personal experience, leadership comes through being in the trenches together. he’s too new to the team to be a leader yet. Maybe he is emerging as a leader, but I don’t see it yet. A quote of his from the last few weeks, he still sounded like an outsider – at least he hedged his language – he wasn’t really talking “we” he was more like “some guys on this team”. I was happy that we picked him up because I was hoping he would bring some of that Giants D attitude to the team.
by oompaloompa on Nov 18, 2008 2:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just
one question WHY does ML try to dance around the defense instead of run to the hole and hit it hard, with all his talent he should be getting more yards than he has. Even on his TD run he tried to make people miss instead of challenging them. Freddy is that type of runner he hits the hole no fakes just run.
Bills Fan in PA
by BILLS on Nov 18, 2008 9:05 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
To be fair, there still aren’t a lot of holes for Marshawn to run through. When he had holes last night, he hit them relatively well. He dances mostly in two situations – when our center gets blown up and he has to dodge a guy in the backfield as soon as he touches the ball, or when he’s strung out outside the tackle and wants to cut it back inside. There were only a couple of instances of “dancing” last night; Marshawn played out of his mind.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 9:20 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Brian
I watched him all thru the game and in previous games and he does it almost all of the time, when he doesn’t he gets good yardage. I know at the game you don’t get the benifit of the replay as well as we do at home, and he just has that herky-jerky running style, he would cover more ground if he didn’t do that. I love the guys intensity and his “beast-mode”, just need more of it. His good runs last night where when he ran with out the jukes.
Bills Fan in PA
by BILLS on Nov 18, 2008 10:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True
His jitterbug often devolves into a slow dance with a linebacker. Action Jackson was initially hitting the cracks fast and then Lynch seemed to follow suit…with better results. Marshawn, dude, save the fancy moves for when you’re in space.
by NJBill on Nov 18, 2008 10:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, I do get the benefit of replay at the game. On a gigantic high-definition scoreboard. With a million fans around me to point things out. Lynch doesn’t dance nearly as often as you say he does, unless we’re operating on a different definition of “dance”.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 11:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Simply
yes he does…but he looked great last night
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Nov 18, 2008 1:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see it. Not last night, at least. I still don’t get how Lynch and his running comes up week after week when he’s the only guy worth a damn offensively right now. Bigger fish, people…
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 2:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing wrong with Lynch’s production, but if there isn’t a gaping hole, he does do some dancing every time. He still finds a way to get yards out of it, but sometimes he needs to just bull forward and take the 3-4 yards instead of dancing around hoping for a big gainer.
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 2:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Can I just point out one thing, people said the exact same thing about another RB some years ago, the dudes name was:
Barry Sanders
Now, Marshawn will never be Barry, but you had to take the good with the bad with him. He was my favorite non-Bill for a very long time, and you knew he would dance a bit, but every so often that dancing would produce magic, like Marshawn’s dump off pass for a touchdown.
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on Nov 18, 2008 4:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jaws was calling him out for dancing last night.
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 11:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jaws
He is great! By far the best analyst in all of football and it’s shocking when he points out something that you didn’t want to believe until you hear him say it.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Nov 18, 2008 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shocking? Didn’t want to believe? You try running through a four-inch hole without dancing. Seriously, Lynch? How does Lynch come up ever week in this fashion?
Jaws, indeed, is great.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 2:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Collinsworth is a lot better
MArshawn wasn’t dancing as much as Jaws thought. I’m glad ESPN decided to cut the face time of the booth crew. Collinsworth is by far the best analyst and the most entertaining covering football today.
by syrbillsfan on Nov 19, 2008 8:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
totally agree
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Nov 19, 2008 2:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Marshawn did this all throughout college, maybe even more than he does now...
The difference is he’d take hits in the backfield and turn the run into 50yd TDs… YHe won’t do that so often in the NFL.
The coaches should get in his ear about it, but he’s been this style runner for so long that I’m sure it’s second nature. I have to think people have talked to him about it since he was a freshman at Cal.
Honestly, I think he’s just not a short yardage back and should be used as a pass catcher as much as possible. He never dropped anything in college and always made the first THREE guys miss. He can really carry a team if he busts out like yesterday, but more drives will stall with his style.
I agree that, with his power, he could get 4-5 yds with minimal holes if he just hit the hole at full speed. Unfortunately, I’ve been waiting for this for 5 years…
I agree with all of you that he’d do much better just hitting the w
...nuh nuh nuh gone
by Thoroughbred on Nov 18, 2008 12:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fine then, we send someone over to Philly to rob the Eagles of their offensive gameplan
And we use him like Westbrook has for the past couple of years.
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on Nov 18, 2008 4:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Brian
this your single best write up I have seen since the start of Buffalo Rumblings. Given the situation, your ability to sift through all of this and offer a thoughtful, analytical point of view is exactly what I needed this morning as I honestly haven’t been this dejected since my college team, ranked #3 nationally, lost in the first round of the NCAA D-III basketball tourney.
Lee Evans 0 catches. Trent Edwards saw 8 man zone coverages and just had no clue. I hoipe hitting rock bottom as an offense in that 1st quarter will allow Turk/Trent to realize what they have to do now. It is simple. Give Lynch 25 touches a game, find a way to get it to Evans. And use Stevie Johnson, Royal, Fine, Parrish over the middle until Reed comes back.
My #1 need since last offseason adn going into the next continues to be a pass catching TE. As far as this season. Playoffs are out of the question. But 9-7, to post a winning record would be nice.
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Nov 18, 2008 9:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Marv.
On Evans – Cleveland literally had him tripled about a third of the night. Running the ball early gets the ball in Lee’s hands later in the game. We need to come out next week and pound it right down KC’s throats. And hell, throw in a reverse to Evans – he has to touch the ball, at least, for this team to have a prayer offensively.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 9:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Edwards doesn’t have enough confidence to throw it downfield to Lee it seems. I just don’t understand how a D can basically triple team our top threat, still cover every other receiver and still find a way to make Edwards uneasy in the pocket. Why don’t we ever run a draw or throw it deep to loosen up some of that 7-8 in coverage? It stinks that a team can put 7-8 in the box for the run, but have no problem succeeding against the pass since those guys in the box can simply drop back a bit and take away our short passing game since that’s all we have.
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 11:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
K, we ran a lot of draws last night. It didn’t help.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 12:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
delayed draws? Not the runs out of the shotgun, those are just inside handoffs.
If the D is going to have 7-8 in coverage, why not try the delayed draw more??
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What? You can run a draw out of either formation. “Draw” stems from the blocking; linemen pass block to get the defense upfield, and the draw takes advantage of those lanes. That can be accomplished in either formation.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m saying the runs out of the shotgun weren’t draws. They were simple inside handoffs, or off tackle runs. The OL was run blocking the whole way.
We need to run the classic draws, something that disguises the play so we can take advantage of those 7-8 guys dropping into coverage. I think we ran one draw play early in the game and got 7 yards or so.
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 2:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It looked like pass blocking to me on the shotgun formations. Regardless, when Schonert didn’t dial it up three times in a row, it worked.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 2:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Simple thing to do here gang
Play Action Pass
Simple, three words that can make all the bleeding difference for us all. Last night we KNEW the Browns would sell out on obvious running downs, we need to do the same again to KC and ACTUALLY hit Evans or someone else for a big gainer down the field. Have Trent and Turk watch some tapes of the classic Peyton games when Edge was still a top 10 back, and incorporate that into their game plans with Lynch, couldn’t hurt!
And it may calm Edwards down doing so by having him think run first then pass it from under center on a run back. Just thinking….
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on Nov 18, 2008 4:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No, you’re right – I’ve said it many times here. We needed more play-action last night.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 4:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think
what has happened is Turk fell in love with Shotgun with Trent. Did you see what happened when they actually ran it out of the shotgun???? It was incredible. Turk wants to whip the ball around, but Trent and his WR’s are not that good yet to do that. He needs to throw the ball no more than 20-25 times a game.
I’m just sick to my stomach and this week is going to be so friggn long…..IF we lose to KC or SF or MIA, I’m going to lose it. I predicted 7-5 with 4 games to go. As a Bills fan I will continue to believe until they are mathematically eliminated, but right now all I want is a hug
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Nov 18, 2008 9:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
no doubt
he fell in love with the shotgun because it does help a young qb, but he has overplayed his hand, and it drives me nuts when they motion the only back out of the backfield. teams either pin their ears back and blitz the hell out of us or they drop 7-8 into coverage when they do that.
my hope is that Turk and Dick have seen the light and they way out of this hole is by running the ball and pounding the other team into submission.
note: I really am sick of saying they need to run the ball more frequently.
by gatornation on Nov 18, 2008 9:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That may be the one silver lining
Turk was forced to pound the ball because his QB had lost all confidence. That commitment, borne out of desperation, enabled the Bills to do something they had to do at some point in the season.
by NJBill on Nov 18, 2008 10:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Last night, we can’t really complain about needing to run it more. They did run it A LOT with Lynch and Jackson. 35 times to be exact. The previous high was 28 times against Seattle, Oakland and SD. It’s the actual play that is the problem, along with the predictability of the formations. My favorite play call of last night was when Turk called a 3rd consecutive shotgun handoff to Jackson. Really, Turk? You thought it would work again?
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 12:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
note
I’m really sick of not making the playoffs and having nothing to cheer about for 5/6 of the last games.
I’m sick of nothing positive. I’m sick of the giving the game away on 4 TO’s. And I really do think it is unacceptable to have your premeir $9 million/year WR never touch teh ball. Put him in the friggn wildcat at least!!!!!!!!
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Nov 18, 2008 9:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Edwards
Paul Hamilton on WGR said Evans was open on numerous occasions last night. And to be fair, I know the deep ball was taken, but I saw Evans on a few plays I could see on TV and he WAS OPEN. HE WAS OPEN. THERE WERE PLAYERS OPEN.
IT IS SIMPLE…TRENT EDWARDS DOES NOT THROW THE BALL ON TIME….HE DOESN"T TRUST HIS WR’S…..HE IS AFRAID. HE IS AFRAID….HE IS AFRAID….I am putting this team, this season, this franchis moving forward…..100% on Trent Edwards. I love him, I think he CAN be good one day, and HAS ALL THE TOOLS….i.e. the Royal throw on the last drive. He just needs to throw the ball. I don’t know how he gets out of it. BUT IT IS COMPLETELY UP TO HIM.
THAT’s what I have learned from last night. It is all QB play. PLEASE GIVE HIM TIME BILLS FANS…GIVE HIM TIME…..HE WILL BE BACK. You can’t give up on him…you can’t
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Nov 18, 2008 10:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree, Trent got really gunshy after those early picks and was terrible. I’m not sure why coaching is getting so much of the heat for a loss when our QB played so poorly and we still had a chance to win it with a very makeable FG, only after the opposition hit a 56 yarder to take the lead.
by kaisertown on Nov 18, 2008 10:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In fact, the coaches did the smart thing by taking the game out of Edwards’ hands. Granted, they should have done it a month ago, but they shouldn’t get blamed for last night.
Anyone have some Mojo we can inject Trent with?
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 11:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pass defense has improved unfortunately
...nuh nuh nuh gone
by Thoroughbred on Nov 18, 2008 12:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Only Trent can pick hinself back up.
Usually the MNF commentators are full of s**t, but Jaws pointed out an excellent observation regarding Trent. He doesn’tt anticipate where the receiver will be in their route, and the best time to get it there. MARVelous, you are spot on when you mentioned timing. Just go back to the Dolphins game and you’ll see a clinic put on by Chad Pennington. He doesn’t have the arm to rifle the ball at the receiver, but he’s crafty enough to anticipate where the receiver will be and to get it there at the right time. Favre does the same thing, but he’s got the arm as well…making him extremely difficult to stop.
by NJBill on Nov 18, 2008 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Trent????
I don’t know if this is a real flaw in his game, or he just was rattled by the picks in such a big game. Honestly, I haven’t seen a QB that scared in quite some time. He had time and he had a running game in the 2nd half. You got to shake that stuff off. Let’s hope he doesn’t follow the Todd Collins career arc.
The pressure should be off him for a while, as this team has hit rock bottom. No more thoughts of playoffs to provide undue pressure, they just need to play one game at a time. Maybe we’ll get his mojo back by the Toronto game.
by NJBill on Nov 18, 2008 10:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Turk must have read your posts Brian
I saw a few runs out of Shotgun for Marshawn, and a few passes from under center.
Having the "security blanket’ RB in the flat seemed to work too-while winning the game might have been the best scenario, for the first time in a month I actually saw something positive from the team. Might have been the best thing to happen to Trent to throw three Picks on four drives because someone HAD to trust the running back to get some stuff done.
And lets face it-Lynch is a first round pick for a reason.
That said, I have to say my Sundays are going to feel a lot less urgent for the rest of the year.
by Frank L on Nov 18, 2008 11:03 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Turk didn’t get the whole message, then. The play-action passing game was there for the taking, but the Bills only ran one such play. He needed to take advantage of that and didn’t. The O played well after the first quarter. They just need to keep it rolling.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 11:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Steve Johnson
Is anyone else very disappointed with James Hardy and Roscoe Parrish that they couldn’t get time over the 7th round pick Johnson. I mean Roscoe has been in the system for 4 years (although his first with Turk) and Hardy was the biggest addition to this offense over the off season. Johnson looked good but I expect the guys this team brings in at the top of the draft to at least get time over other rookies from the same draft. Leodis wouldn’t even have gotten as much time as he did if Jabari wasn’t hurt. Corner has worked at the slot a lot more than Leo but come on, he was the 11th player taken in the draft, he better outperform the rookie 4th round pick.
by louiethegent on Nov 18, 2008 11:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Not Really
I have no expectations for rookie WR’s so Hardy doesn’t seem like a bust to me. But in general I agree, the team has only average drafts on non-Levy years.
by south123 on Nov 18, 2008 11:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would call much of that article "writing scared"
of what we might say! By and large, the coaches did a good job.
April and his crew kept us in the game all night. Their one mistake was the out of bounds kick. Kick away from Cribbs, squib kick it…fine….but don’t kick it out of bounds and give it to the Browns on the 43yd line for Pete sake!!! “Coaching scared”, maybe?
Fewell actually called some press coverage and dialed up some good blitzes. The defense played well enough for us to win for most of the game. Unfortunately, at the end of the game on the Brown’s last drive, we could not stop the 3rd and long pass that got the Browns into field goal range. Does anyone know why? I thought the Tampa 2 soft zone was designed to stop exactly that play? I would have preferred another blitz. Did Fewell fall back into “coaching scared”? Maybe.
Turk is not to blame for the interceptions. Edwards is, no excuses!!! Edwards problems have already been discussed. I do not think Edwards needs to be replaced, and certainly not with JP (haven’t we made that mistake already with JP’s development?). Turk also called a much better game. Play calling was not as predictable for most of the game. Turk is to blame for calling those three runs at the end of the game. He should have called at least one 10yd pass down the middle to get into better field goal range. I call that “coaching scared” for sure. Turk was afraid to be aggressive and decided to hang it on the kicker with a 47yd field goal that was no gimme.
All in all, we saw “The Good,the Bad, and the Ugly”…. An idea for your next “Movie Post” K?
by Joe P. on Nov 18, 2008 11:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Honestly
All in all, we saw "The Good,the Bad, and the Ugly"…. An idea for your next "Movie Post" K?
Honestly, I’ve never seen it. Though I know have the music in my head. WABillsfan made a very nice post with that title.
Plus, if I do another one, it HAS to be comedy. For all our sakes….
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 12:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It is a classic western with Eastwood in his prime!
I would give you a Utube link, but it is blocked here at work.
by Joe P. on Nov 18, 2008 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We kinda do need a 'name'
Or, at least, a veteran guy that can offer veteran leadership. The D is starting to get there, with Mitchell, but the offense really doesn’t have someone in that mold. Someone in the thread last night suggested it be a WR, but I really don’t think the position matters- it’s just an incredibly young team, and young teams do this kind of stuff. It really isn’t a coaching thing (the playcalling doesn’t help, but it isn’t the crux of the problem) or a talent thing even- it’s a locker room/huddle thing, and we just need someone with a presence in those places. IMHO.
John Madden told me 90% of the game was half-mental...
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Nov 18, 2008 12:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
No, I’m not talking about a veteran, necessarily. In all honesty, when I wrote this last night, I had Osi Umenyiora and Justin Tuck in mind.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Last night, both the players and coaches deserve blames. Maybe the players moreso, but you can’t let the coaches constantly get a pass if players make mistakes. With no accountability, these errors will continue.
I understand your ‘be patient’ theme, but how much longer are we supposed to wait for this to turn around? We’ve been rebuilding for 10 years and are on year 3 of the current phase of it. We heard it would take a good 2-3 years before we saw results, but all we are seeing is the same comedy of errors and undertalented team. In 3 years, we still don’t have a very talented team and that has to start at the top with the personnel departments and in the Bills case, Jauron, who oversees who is brought in. I know I talk way too much about Jauron and his coaching, but this is one aspect of his tenure that really does irk me. He’s been involved in who we bring in, but it still looks like we’re starving for talent. Maybe it’s just missing at the wrong positions (DE, C, S), but it’s part of the reason we’re stuck in mediocrity.
Can we really call it an adjustment? Maybe forced change? Seems like the only reason we started running the ball was because Trent was scared and couldn’t get anything done. We should have been running the ball like that weeks ago. We should have come out running against the terrible Browns’ run D. Instead, our first play is an interception because Schonert hates running it. Argh.
How come every time McGee plays off the line, the play goes to him and is an easy completion? He definitely played up on Edwards more last night than he has on WR’s this year, but he still played off him way too often. Every time he did, the Browns made him pay. Why does Fewell keep moving him back then? And maybe it’s not Fewell (though it has to be because McGee would be told to cut the crap) and McGee just does it on his own, but either way, we get toasted EVERY game because of this. Why, why why!!!!???!!!
This team badly needs a defensive player that can make a play when we need it most. Mitchell seems to be close, but we’ve got no one else it seems. Last night, a play out of someone would have been huge. Instead we had Simpson and McKelvin dropping picks, Corner whiffing on a blitz and nobody getting pressure on Quinn when we needed it most. These guys just HAVE to start making some plays out there if we have any hopes of winning some more games this year. We just don’t get turnovers or sacks, which is something I thought this Tampon 2 (for you Joe) was designed around. I’m sick of watching this regression!!!!
Happy to see McKelvin out there playing well. He finally looks to be totally confident in himself returning kicks. It took him almost half the season before he started making cuts back there and going away from the blocking if something wasn’t there. He’s been excellent the past few weeks because of it. And it’s good to see him out there looking to make plays on D. Wish he could have made that catch last night though. He does need to get better against the run. He seems content just diving on the ground when about to get blocked instead of actually going after the ball carrier.
(For the record, I never left the “I don’t trust Rian Lindell” bandwagon)
I thought you were supremely confident in Lindell??? I mentioned it earlier in the year and I feel like you defended him. Am I misreading this?
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 12:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking the same about getting tired of losing
A few thoughts, because I could write a book of opinions after last night’s latest debacle.
I was SO GOOD to finally see a running game and an aggressive defensive (for the most part). It gives me some hope for next year. With almost no passing offense, we still could have won that game, thanks to special teams and a revived running attack.
What bothers me most about Edwards is his lack of field vision which, frankly, I thought he possessed. Someone earlier mentioned “He has all the tools!” Yeah, right – that’s what they said about Rob Johnson over and over, except someone forget to mention “brains” being part of the “tools.” Johnson couldn’t read defenses. Well, Edwards has brains, at least in school, but on the football field, I’m beginning to wonder, unless he lost them on the Arizona field when he was knocked out. Jim Kelly is no Phi Beta Kappa but has “football smarts.” There is a difference.
For Trent – and his inept coaches – to be totally befuddled week-after-week looking at a defensive scheme which has 7-8 guys in pass coverage, doesn’t imply smarts to me. If that scheme is so great, why is every team doesn’t employ it and all the games are low-scoring. There must be ways to beat it. Obviously, our QB and his mentors haven’t figured it out.
Someone herementioned “swagger.” I don’t see that with Edwards. I saw it with Kelly and Flutie, and with almost all the great QBs. Hell, even Losman had some swagger, and he didn’t have half the time to throw Edwards has enjoyed. Trent does seem to have that a crunch time, when the game is on the line, and I like part about him a lot – but then his coach took that away from him on the last three plays, settling for a 47-yard kick into the wind.
Speaking of him, Jauron is still looking like his coach who just plays “not to lose,” which is not a way to win. The Sabres are good at that, too.
By the way, when was the last time we hired a head coach who was a proven NFL winner? About 30 years ago with Chuck Knox? Maybe it’s time again.
by ccthemovieman on Nov 18, 2008 12:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t believe I’ve ever uttered (or typed) the words “supremely confident” about any current Bill. I likely did defend Lindell, because he’s made some big kicks for us as recently as this year, but he’s just… ugh.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 2:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You definitely said something about him before when I said I never have confidence in Lindell making a big kick. Oh well, our worries unfortunately came to fruition. But he should never have been kicking a 47 yarder there anyhow. He’s much better from inside 40 and we never even attempted to get there….
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate that argument. He’s an NFL kicker. Blame the coaches all you want, but Lindell missed a make-able kick. Phil Dawson kicked a 56-yarder, brother.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 2:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s true. I won’t disagree with that.
However, Lindell’s made something like 48 straight from inside 40. You would think the coaches would be trying to get the ball close to the 20 to make that FG much more likely to be made. That’s the argument I’m making. Lindell still needs to make that kick though.
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 2:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
absolutely
when we got to the 34 i was screaming for 10 more yards. the completion occurred with 1:26 on the clock, and we managed to get four yards. even if you don’t trust the offense, we left the browns 45 seconds even if we made the FG. a first down makes for a much easier kick with no time left. it was pathetic. i didnt want them to pass, but run the football to the outside. sean rogers owned the middle of the line (he bowled over preston all game long and was in edwards’ face constantly). so of course, the bills run into the middle of the line 3 times in a row and kick a 47 yd FG in 20 degree weather with blustery wind.
say what you will, but not showing the intelligence/willingness to run to the outside (where they were effective throughout the game) to end the game, and instead running to the browns only defensive strength, was my biggest regret (outside of not running the first 15 plays of the game which i suggested pregame). worst thing that happens is you lose a few yards (not likely with what the browns showed against the run last night) or end up out of bounds (which doesnt matter if you get a first down).
of course an NFL kicker should make that kick, but it isnt easy, and showing a willingess to leave the game up to a long kick in windy conditions is a classic dick jauron move (not calling for his head, just a little confidence).
by jmorris0823 on Nov 18, 2008 8:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
good post....I still would have been OK with one pass out of the 3 plays
by Joe P. on Nov 18, 2008 10:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
me too
but let’s not get crazy here. we have to take baby steps with a 55 year old head coach. i would have run (on second down) a play action rollout with numerous options available in the flat (including the first row). i don’t mind the fact that an incomplete pass would have saved the browns a timeout, in that situation you should be thinking about getting a first down and a chip shot, not the repercussions associated with failure.
outside of his ultra-conservative approach, i really don’t mind jauron. i wasnt thrilled with the midseason extension, but i dont mind his demeanor. it is laughable that his personality was lauded as even-keel and calming while the bills were winning, and is now referred to as uninspired and lacking confidence. i would be content if he showed at least a bit of chutzpah in the play calling and game plan, on both sides of the ball.
by jmorris0823 on Nov 18, 2008 10:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Should have made it
but if we had any confidence in our offense we should have tried to get an extra 10-15 yards. There was plenty of time on the clock and we did absolutely nothing to try to get any closer. This was eerily reminiscent of the Super Bowl when Marv Levy played conservatively to get a 47 yard attempt for Norwood…we all know how that one turned out.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Nov 18, 2008 3:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly, then, we didn’t have confidence in our offense, did we? Especially Edwards.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 4:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Edwards is our guy
He needs a better mentor. Get someone at QB coach or offensive coordinator that has experience and knowledge that can translate into better play for Trent on the field.
Aaron Rodgers had Favre teach him for three years how to have presence in the pocket and keep his focus up the field when the pressure comes. You can see the Favre in Rodgers out on the field.
Matt Cassel sat and watched as Tom Brady picked apart defenses, and absorbed his confidence and work ethic. He looks like Brady’s twin brother out there for the Pats.
Who has Trent had around him to help him mature into a good QB? JP Losman, Gibran Hamdan, Alex Van Pelt, Steve Fairchild, and Turk Schonert. Not my first picks to mentor a young QB.
Who is out there that can help? Here is my short list:
- Norm Chow (he would likely take a job in the NFL if it looked like a good opportunity)
- Steve Sarkisian (has led countless USC quarterbacks to success)
- Gary Crowton (one of the best offensive play callers in college football at LSU)
We need a PROVEN guy. Someone who can lemonade out of this lemon.
Others to consider as just a QB coach:
- Jim Harbaugh
- Trent Dilfer (yes, I think he could be a good mentor for Edwards)
- Jim Kelly (one of the greatest play callers on the field of all time)
by bruuuuce_02 on Nov 18, 2008 12:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jim Harbaugh’s not going to give up the head coaching position at Stanford to be a QB coach in the NFL
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 18, 2008 12:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you're right
I wouldn’t mind seeing him as an offensive coordinator I suppose. He has much more experience than Turk, and he is a winner.
I just can’t get over how mediocre this staff is. The head coach has been fired twice, the defensive coordinator hasn’t kept a job in his career for more than 3 years, and the offensive coordinator has never coached before. See a trend there?
We have the pieces nearly together with the players on the roster, but the guys who need to mentor them and coach them to success are losers. That’s sad.
by bruuuuce_02 on Nov 18, 2008 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s not true that Fewell hasn’t kept a job for more than 3 years too. He was the secondary coach in Jacksonville for 5 years.
He chose to leave Vanderbuilt (he was the secondary coach and an assistant head coach) to get a shot in the NFL. He coached under Tom Coughlin in Jacksonville for 5 seasons and only lost his job when Tom Coughlin got fired. He also left St. Louis and wasn’t fired, Lovie Smith was the D Coordinator in STL before he got the head coaching job in Chicago and he took Fewell with him. And he wasn’t fired from Chicago, he merely took the Bills D coordinator position. So Fewell is a guy who has never been fired to my knowledge. He has only bounced around because that is the nature of being a position coach in the NFL.
by kaisertown on Nov 18, 2008 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Game Notes:
1.Trent Edwards was game M.V.P. of the Cleveland Browns, 3 interceptions in the first quarter, compounded with the fact that we are still seeing nothing much else from him other than dumpoffs constantly and we all seen the wideopen pass that he missed to Lee Evans when their was no one on his side of the endzone!
2.Im not sure on this but it seemed that it was possible that when McKelvin nearly had that interception, that it looked like Reggie Corner nearly or did scoop up the int. before it hit the ground?
3.Wow did Leodis McKelvin ever show up tonight! Great on returns and also good at corner
4.Marshawn Lynch is our true M.V.P. and showed us why tonight despite the lack of any kind of a productive passing game or consistent run blocking. Beastmode was on tonight!
5.Our defense despite being put in many very tough spots to dig themselves out of still held in there and played a respectable game!
6.I was happy to see Stevie Johnson out there and he looked good with every oppurtunity with the exception of one major drop that would have gotten us the first that instead lead to a punt. Props to Stevie J. and I think we found ourselves a winner in him!
7. Yes Lindell missed what would have been the game winning field goal and there’s no excuse for it but in the game of football it happens. One thing I can say for him is that he never should have been in that situation in the first place! It was obvious that we were the better team and this despite 4 turnovers never should have been as close as it was and we have to give a lot of credit to our defense for keeping us in this one through out being put in repeated tough situations early and they held there own.
We’ve got from this moment ths start of a 6 game season, all is not lost so I hope we go out there and set the league on fire for the remaining 6 games-starting at K.C. this sunday! I’ll be there at arrowhead supporting whoever’s our QB and every player in a Bills uniform!
————————————————————————————————————————
by Fam_1st on Nov 18, 2008 1:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Oh and BeastMode was on tonight—Along with AirBeastMode!
by Fam_1st on Nov 18, 2008 1:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm only going to say one thing about the coaching
Why were they running for inches after that great throw by Trent to get us in field goal range. At least try to gain 7-10 more yards for your kicker. We get that first we can totally run out the clock and Lindell gets a 38 yarder. Thats it. I’m done.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Nov 18, 2008 2:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The logic there is that you take as much time off the clock as possible so Cleveland can’t counter. I’m not sure if you noticed, also, but Trent Edwards sucked yesterday. Sure, it sucks that they couldn’t get closer, but given the circumstances, I have a hard time blaming the staff for going conservative when Lindell clearly had the leg to make that kick. He just shanked it.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 2:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
get 10 yds, the first down, then kill the clock with
3 predictable runs. Yes, he missed it, but it was not an easy kick. Maybe you know the percentages of kicks in the NFL that are missed out side of 45 yds vs inside of 35? Bottom line….Turk felt the pressure and played for the field goal, not for getting the first down.
by Joe P. on Nov 18, 2008 3:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You dont think the HC has some say in what the OC does????
Im sure they (Turk and Dick) Talked about what they wanted to do in that situation.
Disappointment proves that expectations were mistaken.......ladies and gentlemen your 2008 Buffalo Bills.....
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 18, 2008 3:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, he does. He very likely said run it. He did not, however, say “run these three specific plays”. If you want to argue about the plays themselves, Schonert’s the guy to go after. Jauron’s theory is sound, especially with the way Edwards had played.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 4:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I dont for one second believe that Jauron is the micromanager type...so yes I agree with your assessment Brian
I dont believe he told Turk what plays to call, but I definitely believe he was in Turk’s ear about what they should do……
Disappointment proves that expectations were mistaken.......ladies and gentlemen your 2008 Buffalo Bills.....
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 18, 2008 5:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Granted Edwards had not had a good game,
but didn’t Edwards just fire a bullet to Royal to get them to that point? Way to show some faith in your QB!
by Joe P. on Nov 18, 2008 10:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
also
why were they diving up the middle. I would have had no problem with trying to run but by getting the backs the ball in space. A toss or something. At least after two dives run the play action!!!
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Nov 18, 2008 3:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, of course he did. In short, the offense was in position to win the game.
The only argument I like there is the “predictable runs” part. Why can’t we run a toss play, and tell Marshawn to keep it inbounds?
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 4:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Conservative mentality
That conservative mentality is why are still waiting for our first ever Super Bowl Champions…I like a more aggressive approach, putting a dagger in the heart of the opponent instead of playing to not make a mistake. So Trent didn’t make a mistake but we missed the kick…the problem is that I feel cheated because they didn’t give it there all at the end. I would have preferred to see Edwards throw his fourth interception than to see us run three consecutive plays and miss a 47 yard field goal.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Nov 18, 2008 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would have preferred to see Edwards throw his fourth interception than to see us run three consecutive plays and miss a 47 yard field goal.
Ha, are you KIDDING me, D.O.?! If that had happened, people would be going even more nuts today than they already are. “Why didn’t they just kick the field goal?!” Second guessing is dumb.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 4:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Edwards
People are already up in arms about Edwards and rightfully so. If the coaching staff has confidence to put him on the field than they should have the confidence that he can win the game. They didn’t, they chose to run three times and leave 40 seconds on the clock because they don’t trust the QB. I’m not starting a Fire Jauron post here but if the coaching staff has no confidence in the guy they put on the field it is their own fault.
I obviously didn’t want to see an interception thrown but I also didn’t want to see them sit on the ball and be content with a long field goal try. Good teams go for the jugular and they would have kept driving and run the clock down to zero when they made that FG attempt.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Nov 18, 2008 9:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Lynch had been carrying well all day.
Who is to say that he doesn’t pick up 6 yards a pop on those runs. He didn’t but I think Lynch’s average was better than Edwards and it’s a safer call. I wanted them to pass last night too but looking back I don’t think it was such a terrible call anymore condiering what had already transpired
by MattRichWarren on Nov 18, 2008 2:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Browns knew it was going to be 3 runs,
or at least that Turk/Edwards was not going to burn them deep. It makes call the defensive plays much easier. They were set up for a nice short pass to the TE in the middle, but we didn’t have the guts to call it.
by Joe P. on Nov 18, 2008 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
problem is
even if he makes that kick, the Bills probably would lose on a FG by Dawson….just saying that is our luck
I have decided to throw everything out the window and look at #1 thing. Trent Edwards. I love him. I really do but it is all about him. He has to get better. I hope these hard times, he can fight thru and be a better QB bc of it. BUT WE HAVE TO run the ball like that for him to be successful all the time. What Jason Peters did, on running down the field and FINISHING BLOCKS was PRO-BOWL PERFORMANCE. He was an absolute stud last night
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Nov 18, 2008 2:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
No coincidence it was on MNF
Where has that effort been all year Peters?
by Joe P. on Nov 18, 2008 3:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As I said somewhere here earlier this week, there are rumors that the team is less pleased with Dockery. They feel Peters is playing at an All Pro level; Dockery, however, has sucked. He didn’t last night. Shaun Rogers made some plays (how could he not with Duke “Matador” Preston playing center?), but Dock more than held his own when he doubled.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 18, 2008 5:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Peters needs the money
Yea Peters did play great last night its about time! I bet his agent told him that his big payday was in jepordy because of his crappy play so far. He’s only got a little season left to prove he’s worth the big money
by LuBAR on Nov 18, 2008 3:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
what are you talking about......he still has 2 years left on his contract........
He DOESNT have to get resigned yet if the Bills dont to……..
Disappointment proves that expectations were mistaken.......ladies and gentlemen your 2008 Buffalo Bills.....
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 18, 2008 3:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
***want
Disappointment proves that expectations were mistaken.......ladies and gentlemen your 2008 Buffalo Bills.....
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 18, 2008 3:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yea but.....
When he came back both parties sounded like they were trying to work out an extension. And if he would like some new money after this year he’s gotta make sure he gets back to pro bowl form. But i agree, the Bills don’t have to do anything since they have the leverage
by LuBAR on Nov 18, 2008 4:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Swagger
I have to say, I’m tired of hearing about “swagger”. Its the most cliched term in professional football. Trent did not throw those horrible picks because he lacks “swagger”, but because he made poor reads. “Swagger” doesn’t win games, execution wins games. We need to not make crucial mistakes, its as simple as that.
Sorry, but I had to get that off of my chest.
by PozDispenser on Nov 18, 2008 5:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
No one thing
wins or loses football games, but a combination of items. “Execution” covers a lot of ground, and I agree if you mean blocking, tackling, throwing good passes, catching the ball, etc.
I would also add “game preparation” means a lot, too. You can execute a dumb game plan and still get killed. The will-to-win and even just plain “luck” also contributes to victories as do, probably, a few other things.
Have you ever noticed, too, how good teams win most close games and are lucky, while bad teams lose and seem to get bad calls, too?
Anyway, this is the place to get things off your chest. It helps, especially in recent weeks!
by ccthemovieman on Nov 18, 2008 5:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
cliche
most cliche term in football, and my least favorite, has to be a quarterback allegedly having the undefined “IT” (which can be defined as an accurate and relatively strong arm, good field vision, pocket mobility, and playing well under pressure). we’ve fought that fight here in the past though. memories.
by jmorris0823 on Nov 18, 2008 8:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Trent has to learn how to beat any defense he sees.
Every team is going to play double deep zone against Trent for the rest of his career. He has got to learn how to beat it or it will end his young career. If I was in a position to scheme the offense, I would not have Trent in an empty backfield formation for the rest of the season. He needs to have the comfort of knowing he can audible into a running play when he see that defense.
by gjv on Nov 18, 2008 6:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Here's my thing...
Last night was devastating for me. I saw us dominate in nearly every facet of the game and still it ended up coming down to that damn 47 yard field goal (ultimate irony of course/wide right). We can’t go back to the run, run, pass punt scenario of the Fairchild days, but when we’re running the ball so consistently for a change and the Brownies are indubitably stacking the box to stop it, why oh why, do we never attempt to split the safeties or perhaps double moves with Lee on the outside via the play action pass?
This offense seems to be completely devoid of that. People counter with the chunk yardage explanation, which is a good one when we’re doing that consistently, but Evans needs to man up and learn how to beat double coverage once in a while. He should not escape blame here. There is absolutely no excuse against that porous secondary that he would not even record a catch. I’m not even sure if I remember him even receiving a target on the night. That’s pathetic for the amount of money we’re paying him. I love Lee Evans, but he’s got to take that next step to be a consistent performer because the great ones always do.
I’ve never been to Buffalo, don’t have any family or friend ties there, I just became a fan in the SB days as a wee lad. I think Jauron is the coach to get us out of this rut. I think Edwards is the QB to do it. We’ve got the coach, QB, RB, WR, defense, but it all still seems to be a work in progress. That’s fine as long as we’re truly building something that will be a consistent and sustainable winner. People that say we have no great players on our team should be shot. We have a lot of players who are poised to be great because they’re blessed with great physical tools, but they are still developing.
As far as I can see it, if you eliminate the bonehead mistakes that have plagued us (mainly Edwards) these last 4 weeks, we win 3 out of 4 of these games at least. The NFL is a game of inches in both the literal and proverbial sense and mistakes tend to get exploited in this league. We’re not quite to the point where we can overcome these mistakes to the extent that we’ve been making them. That’s the facts Jack. The great teams minimize mistakes and recover from their occasional miscue. We’ve found out the hard way that we’re not quite there yet. Edwards is a 2nd year QB for goodness’ sake, and he’s been beaten to a bloody pulp this year, so it stands to reason that he is still feeling a little apprehensive at the trigger.
I’m going to the game in KC this weekend. I can only hope that we truly come out and stomp them. Push the pedal to the metal and keep it there. We need a week one-esque drubbing of the lowly Chiefs to break the chain! Sorry for the rant, but I had to get that off my chest. We’re on the right track, and I’ll Billieve that until the day I die.
by live6453 on Nov 18, 2008 6:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Irony
This offense seems to be completely devoid of that. People counter with the chunk yardage explanation, which is a good one when we’re doing that consistently, but Evans needs to man up and learn how to beat double coverage once in a while. He should not escape blame here. There is absolutely no excuse against that porous secondary that he would not even record a catch. I’m not even sure if I remember him even receiving a target on the night. That’s pathetic for the amount of money we’re paying him. I love Lee Evans, but he’s got to take that next step to be a consistent performer because the great ones always do.
He was open all night but Trent was either afraid or just didn’t want to throw down field. There is no way you could possibly blame Lee Evans for not catching a ball last night.
D.O.
www.diebytheblade.com - An SB nation destination for Sabres fans everywhere
by David Oleksy on Nov 18, 2008 9:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He did record a tackle though on the first INT.........was a pretty nice hit
Disappointment proves that expectations were mistaken.......ladies and gentlemen your 2008 Buffalo Bills.....
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 19, 2008 12:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me qualify
Obviously Trent had the blinders on and could not find the open receiver, and I don’t have the luxury of actually being at the game so I can’t key in on every play that Evans is involved in. Let me reiterate that I love Lee Evans and everything he brings to the table. I believe he is worth the contract he got, but I also recognize that he has a tendency to disappear in a lot of key games, i.e. every Pats game since he’s been in the league. Until someone emerges on the outside opposite him as a legit threat he’s going to be bracketed and blanketed to death. Whether it’s his inability to get open or the more likely culperate being the shoddy playcalling or QB play, he has a significant history of not coming up big in big games. I just see the insane ability and potential he possesses and want to see him fully realize it. That’s all.
PS… I do remember last year’s MNF affair when Terrance Newman intercepted Trent in the RZ and would’ve taken it to the house had Lee not come out of nowhere to chase him down by like the 40 yard line. I still say he’s the fastest player in the league quite possibly.
by live6453 on Nov 19, 2008 5:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















