Despite big win, Bills' defense needs improvement
I know, I know. The Buffalo Bills are coming off of a 54-31 win over the hapless Kansas City Chiefs. Buffalo's offense is getting most of the credit, but the defense was the catalyst, forcing four turnovers and putting a score on the board via rookie cornerback Leodis McKelvin. I get that. It was an exciting win. But for every revived playoff dreamer out there, there's the "it was just the Chiefs" argument. And if we're following that argument, it's only fair to point out that while the defense made plays, they also got absolutely torched on Sunday.
You think Buffalo's offense was potent on Sunday? The Chiefs out-gained them, putting up 462 yards on the Bills. Despite playing from behind for more than half the game, the Chiefs still rushed for 159 yards, and the dynamic passing duo of Tyler Thigpen and Quinn Gray combined for 303 yards and four touchdowns. The 1-10 Chiefs dialed up 9 plays in which they gained 20 yards or more against the Bills. Were these the Chiefs, or the New England Patriots?
Yes, the Bills' defense has done good things over the past few weeks. They've been put in terrible situations by a turnover-happy offense, and acquitted themselves rather well in those situations, holding opponents to field goals on several occasions. In short, they played well enough to win during the team's four-game losing streak. But like it or not, the Bills have still given up an average of 26.2 points per game over the past five weeks, a stretch in which the Bills have gone 1-4. Points are what matters in this league. The defense is failing that test.
The tackling has been terrible; the most prominent offender has been LB Kawika Mitchell, who was especially ineffective in Kansas City against the team that drafted him. The team has given up big runs of late, including long jaunts by Cleveland's Jerome Harrison and Kansas City's Larry Johnson in the last two weeks alone. The pass rush is, as usual, largely ineffective. The unit is also banged up, missing DE Aaron Schobel for the past five games and without several cornerbacks and safety Donte Whitner for stretches as well.
We know every problem that the defense has. They sprung some serious leaks against Kansas City despite the plays they did make. Unless the Bills plan on scoring 54 points every week, the Bills have some serious work to do defensively in nearly every facet of the game.
The ever-delightful Jerry Sullivan says Dick Jauron insulted his intelligence and took his conservatism to new heights by leaving Trent Edwards on the field late in the win over the Chiefs. Call me crazy, but leaving your starting QB on the field in that situation sounds more like a gamble than anything. If I'm calling Jauron conservative, I'm saying it if he took Edwards out at the start of the fourth quarter. I guess Jerry needs to be sad about something, because, well, he is.
I like this column if only because Leo Roth (a heck of a nice guy) and Sal Maiorana try really hard to use big words. Oh, and they discuss the merits of beating the Chiefs, too - and agree that Buffalo's defense has been bad.
WGRZ takes, in essence, a minute-by-minute look back at Kevin Everett's injury in an incredible interview of everyone involved. A chilling read.
If you're looking for the best blogging coverage on this past weekend's action in the NFL - for any game you may be interested in reviewing - click on this nice little button here...
0 recs |
30 comments
|
Comments
well
week 12 was the highest point total in the NFL ever so it seems like every defense was giving up at leas 25 points. I don’t know. Like I said, we beat bad teams. But, unfortunately its time for me to break out the “tough-love covenant” and be a nay sayer until this team beats a club with a winning record….So go beat SF, and get everyone healthy and back for the Miami game and let’s see what happens.
As far as the defense goes though, Poz has been disappointing lately, and our front 7 as a whole is not getting the job done. We need Poz and Mitchell to start making tackles at the line of scrimmage and sacking the QB.
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Nov 25, 2008 10:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Poz has been disappointing lately? How about the whole season? He’ll give us the tackle for loss occasionally, and his tackle numbers don’t look bad, but has he ever made a big play? Seriously, ever? I thought he was a good blitzer but every time I see him do it, he is a step slow and gets engulfed by the OL. I know he’s in year 2, but at some point it would be nice if he showed some ability to do something besides get a few tackles.
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 25, 2008 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Technically, K, I’d place him in Year 1. 10 quarters of football does not a rookie season make.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 25, 2008 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ok, but I’d like to see some sign that he is anything more than a tackler out there. It’d be nice to have some big play LB’s….
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 25, 2008 12:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think we Drafted Poz to be a big play guy. He is a hardworking guy, he is smart, and he is a leader. The Bills drafted him, because great football teams are built around guys like Poz. He does a good job of getting the defense in the right position, and is a pretty good tackler. I agree that he is not the worlds best blitzer, but the weakness in the linebacking core, not suprislingly, is backup Keith Ellison. He is just not strong enough to shed blocks or get to the QB.
I think the Bills would benefit greatly by drafting a playmaking outside linebacker such as sean weatherspoon from Missouri or Aaron Curry from Wake Forest. These guys are impact players because they sack the QB, get lots of tackles for loss, make big hits, and intercept the ball. If you guys want a good site to look at college football players, cfbstats.com is a great site.
by buffaloboy90 on Nov 25, 2008 1:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would love to get one of those guys, but when our DE and C needs are so much greater, it would be tough to add one of them instead of a guy at one of those positions….
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 25, 2008 2:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Missed tackles
There have been missed tackles on RBs and on QB sacks. Doing well at tackling are the special teams really and the DBs have also been doing well tackling (when not blitzing, Reggie!!!) in the open field. It’s the “inside the box” tackling that has stunk. Mitchell had at least two last week. Our LBs and DBs in run support are not playing all that well. Hopefully, that can change. It’s not like it’s been an every-week problem for them, just recently really.
by MattRichWarren on Nov 25, 2008 11:03 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I definitely agree with you. I have seen Kawika Mitchell miss multiple tackles over the course of this season. The guy just doesn’t rap up well. Also, check out the safety he should have had on tyler thigpen last week.
by buffaloboy90 on Nov 25, 2008 1:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was surprised that to see Edwards in the game late in the 4th and even more surprised to see him throwing. Of all the times for the offense to be more aggressive that expected, this was the time they chose. Simply bizarre.
Our D is just getting worse, yet again. Tackling, bad. Pass rush, non-existent, Big plays allowed, plenty. LB’s looking foolish, check. Poor safety play, check. Getting manhandled at the line, check. Just like the past few years. At least our young CB’s are starting to really come on…..
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 25, 2008 12:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I respect that you didn’t want Trent Edwards to get hurt. However, I think Dick Jauron wanted Edwards to gain his confidence back. Obviously, his confidence was shaken up in the Cleveland game. Every play that went well in the KC game gave him more and more confidence. I would also argue that playing time is so crucial for Trent since he is a such a young QB.
Go Bills!
by buffaloboy90 on Nov 25, 2008 1:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I never said anything about Trent getting hurt, I was just surprised that Jauron had him in there. I’m not saying leaving him in there wasn’t the right call either, especially with the way he’s played recently….
~K
by Kurupt on Nov 25, 2008 2:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You could see the game start
to get chippy. At that point, about midway through the 4th quarter, I would have gotten all of our key starters out.
by Joe P. on Nov 25, 2008 3:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You said it was “bizarre”. I just personally thought it made a lot of sense.
by buffaloboy90 on Nov 25, 2008 5:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LB's
it has been tough seeing the LB’s, especially Mitchell who arguably is OUR biggest playmaker on defense miss so many plays the last 2 weeks. He needs to be better and lead this defense by example….last week he looked seriously out of whack and terribly hung over or something. I mean it was like playing Madden when the computer just decides no one will tackle the ball carrier and Mitchell just BOUNCED off carriers……COME ON! I mean, that’s why McKelvin is such a breath of fresh air and WE HAVE to keep GREER. These guys are PLAYMAKERS. You can’t teach that. They have great football instincts. The more Kyle Williams, George Willson, Mitchell, McKelvins, Greer this team has the better off it will be. Not only is there football IQ and work ethic sound, but there natural football instincts are so obvious….our big name guys like Poz, Whitner, Stroud seem to never have their name called
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Nov 25, 2008 2:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and Mitchell just BOUNCED off carriers
Or just ran a complete circle around them, allowing a free run to the endzone.
These guys are PLAYMAKERS. You can’t teach that. They have great football instincts. The more Kyle Williams, George Willson, Mitchell, McKelvins, Greer this team has the better off it will be.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen George Wilson’s name in a list like this. Do you seriously think he’s that great of a player?
by thefourwinds on Nov 25, 2008 11:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Poz is out of position
I would not be surprised to see the Bills draft or bring in a veteran MLB. Poz has the makings to be a pro bowl weak side LB. He is marginal at best in this defense playing MLB.
by gjv on Nov 25, 2008 3:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I dream of a scenario where we get a DE or C via the veteran pool, then draft USC’s Brian Cushing to play inside for us. That would rock.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 25, 2008 4:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cushing is up there but would’nt Mauluaga be the best of the USC Linebackers?
by Fam_1st on Nov 26, 2008 2:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well yeah, but we won’t be picking high enough to pick up Maualuga.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 26, 2008 2:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s what I was thinking also, but we could move up by either way I would prefer us to go center first and follow up with ILB and DE, of course it all comes down to who is available where and who might be available in the following rounds.
by Fam_1st on Nov 26, 2008 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I do’nt know much about USC this year and quit following NCAA closely cause my team is terrible but they did hire a great one out of retirement yesterday so they’ll be back!
by Fam_1st on Nov 26, 2008 2:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also we’ll have to wait and see how it plays aout with the team needs of who’s picking in front of us.
by Fam_1st on Nov 26, 2008 3:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also Brian Cushing reminds me of Bobby Carpenter, and USC more than any other school has some major flops in the pros due to them being surrounded by high level recruits it’s hard to make any player on that team the focal point of their opponents to key on.
by Fam_1st on Nov 26, 2008 3:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think Poz has the speed to play outside linebacker. His physical attributes are better suited for a mlb role imo. You can look at his workout #‘s at nfldraftscout.com, just type in his name in the player box. It’s also fun to compare guys who have been successful to guys who you are thinking about drafting.
by buffaloboy90 on Nov 25, 2008 5:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Poz would be an all pro weakside LB.
Poz has the speed to play OLB. In our current defensive scheme he would be an outstanding weak side LB. He is a good tackler and has the speed to cover in the flat. What Poz has a hard time with is droping back in the Tampa two to cover the middle.I think Jouron and company saw Poz as a Urlacker type. But Urlacker was a safety in college and has better cover skills in the middle. Poz is currently out of position and the coaches know this. He will move to the outside and be the playmaker we need.
by gjv on Nov 25, 2008 6:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Conservative
I think, Brian, that Sullvian means conservative in the true sense of the word — namely, a reluctance to change. This is where things like philology help…
by spavery on Nov 25, 2008 5:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
A philologist I am not. I guess I can understand the comment, then, but it just seems like he’s looking for an excuse to call out Jauron. Again.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Nov 25, 2008 7:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn, I consider myself a pretty accomplished writer, and I had to look up “philology.” What a blog!
by thefourwinds on Nov 26, 2008 12:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was wanting to ask if anyone knew what the word is on Chris Ellis and what type of role do you think he will have in the future of this defense? What would you think the reason is on why he’s gotten so little oppurtunity on the field this season?
by Fam_1st on Nov 26, 2008 2:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 























