Five Things
I've never done my own FanPost (I feel like I should add a little "trademarked" symbol after that), but I got to workter getting jerked around by the NYC subway for an hour, and felt I needed to spread some positivity to myself and others. I was going to put this all on MARVelous's recent "3 Things" post, but I found I actually had a lot more positive things to say then I assumed I would. So in no particular order...
1) Trent Edwards. Like many of you, I've spent more than a little time in the last six weeks or so hurling ineffectual insults at our struggling QB (Note: Pointing out how poorly they're playing to your TV set seems to rarely make a difference. I keep doing it anyways). But what I've seen, in addition to endless dump passes, is a command of a lot of the little things you need to be good QB in this league. Trent uses his cadence and hard count very effectively (I'm specifically thinking about the Ravens game last year and the Chiefs game this year). As Jaworski likes to see, he processes information quickly (we saw the contrast sharply with Losman the last two weeks). Most importantly, we've seen Trent march the Bills down at the end of the game and put them in a position to win. We obviously didn't win all those games, but that says a lot about his calm and focus under pressure.
Lest anyone think that the process is taking too long for Edwards, let me direct you to the career of one Drew Brees. His second year as a starter he started 11 games, here's the pertinent stats:
2,108 yards, 5.9 yards per attempt, 57.6% completion percentage, 11 TDs, 15 INTs
Edwards:
2.378 yards, 7.3 yards per attempt, 66.0% completion percentage, 10 TDs, 10 INTs.
Am I approaching this scientifically? Wouldn't dream of it. I am however, pointing out that I'd be much happier with '08 Edwards than '03 Brees. And Brees turned out a little ok.
2) The Defense. We all know they've had some issues, but they've also made major progress in some areas. Let's throw a bunch of numbers at y'all:
3rd Down percentage: 36%. Aside from the Patriots game, we've actually gotten teams off of the field on 3rd down. We're 9th in the league and almost 10% better than last season.
20+ Yard Completions: 28. Generally, we don't get beaten deep. We're 4th in the NFL (although we're middle of the pack in 40+ yarders). We were dead last in 2007 (55).
Yards Per Carry: 4.0. Not a surprise probably, what with the acquistion of Stroud and the emergence of Kyle Williams, but important to point out nonetheless. We're only 16th in the league, but more importantly, we're giving up about half a yard less per carry from last year (4.4).
I might also add that we're significantly better in total yards per game (362.9 in '07 to 313.2 this year), passing yards per game (238.4 to 203.1) and rushing (124.6 to 110.2).
3) The Offense. As ugly as it has sometimes gotten here, we've made a lot of progress here too. Even more numbers:
Points: 21.5. Not exactly an awe-inspiring figure, and only 22nd in the league, however- we were 30th last year and are scoring almost a touchdown more (15.8). Huzzah!
Avg. Yards Per Pass Attempt: 7.3. Often touted as a real indicator of an effective passing game, currently we're comfortably over that magic number 7. We also happen to be 11th in the league up from 23rd last year (6.4). Even with all those check downs, our downfield passing game actually exists this year! Yippie! More proof: We have 37 passes of 20+ yards or more, which is 10th in the league and 4 more than last year with 3 games to go. Bueno!
Completion Percentage: 65.1%. Even though I'm skeptical at how much a completion percentage says about a passing game in the 21st century, this is much better than last year. We're 6th in the league, up from 23rd last year (59.1%). Combine that with the average per pass attempt, there's a lot to be optimistic about in the passing game.
4) Blake Costanzo. I had to give the man some love. Man has two forced fumbles on kickoff returns and a bunch of special teams tackles. All this while being saddled with unlikely name of "Blake Costanzo".
5) Youth. I know "potential" has become a dirty word, but we have a boatload of key players who are still learning/entering their prime. We have only 14 players older than 27, and only 7 players who are 30 or older (Stroud, Moorman, Whittle, Lindell, Schobel, Royal, and Denney).
This FanPost was written by a registered user of Buffalo Rumblings. Its views do not necessarily reflect the views of Rumblings' editorial staff, but are just as valued as our own.
11 recs |
27 comments
Comments
nice post.......rec'd
It’s only a tad less frustrating seeing those numbers…..
But that just goes to show how bad the team was last year…….
hopefully with another solid draft and another off-season of work…..the pieces will finally result into something positive.
PIPE DREAM: Jim Harbaugh for the Bills next head coach.
by norcaliangelsfan on Dec 10, 2008 7:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is a great, great, great post!
My thoughts:
The jury is still out on Trent. He has shown signs of being the real deal, but only time will tell. We should all be praying, sticking pins in dolls or whatever we believe to work that he ends up being the real deal, otherwise the whole rebuilding process essentially starts over.
3rd Down percentage: 36%
Words can’t describe how happy I am that you mentioned that. I fell like the fan expectations are way too high and rip on Fewell everytime this team gives up a first down, but the proof is in the statistics. This scheme works. It does stop thrid downs, it does limit points.
20+ Yard Completions: 28
And that is the entire point of the scheme. I feel like I am the only person left on this blog (I know that isn’t true) who actually believes the cover 2 works as well as a 3-4 or some aggressive blitzing 4-3.
Yards Per Carry: 4.0
We’ve still got work to do, but a defensive end and outside linebacker who don’t overpursue would be a good start. A healthy Whitner playing with Bryan Scott will make something of a difference too.
Avg. Yards Per Pass Attempt: 7.3. Often touted as a real indicator of an effective passing game
Count me as one of those people who feel that way about ypa.
by kaisertown on Dec 10, 2008 7:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice post, PozDispenser (not to mention nice user name).
I’ve long felt that Edwards and Brees are similar players – Edwards is just more of a physical specimen than Brees – so I like the comparison. Let’s hope we don’t pull a San Diego and oust him for a youngster!
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Dec 10, 2008 8:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Great Post PD!
I agree with your assessment of Trent. Many of the great ones struggled in their first couple of seasons… I had posted a response with some detailed stats:
=======
I decided to look at the two first seasons of some of the great ones and the results were quite surprising. Because there is such a big discrepancy in the quantity of games played over their two first seasons it’s difficult to use any other indicator but the QB rating. I know its not perfect but it does mean something and for the purpose at hand it is probably a very accurate stat to use.
Unfortunately, what these stats don’t show is the compliment around him. For example, Big ben benefited being on a team that had a top rated defense generating lots of turnovers with short fields and he also had a great OLINE & Running game. So unfortunately it’s impossible to take all those other factors into account. What we do know however is that Trent has had to produce these numbers with a really weak Offensive line, an overall weak running game, a defense that has a very difficult time getting off the field and rarely creates turnovers.
So lets look at where Trent lies amongst some of the great ones:
ROOKY YEAR
Rank Player GS Att Comp PCT Yards TD INT Rating
1 Big Ben 13 295 196 66.4 2621 17 11 98.1
2 Dan Marino 9 296 173 58.4 2210 20 6 96
3 Tom Brady 14 413 264 63.9 2843 18 12 86.5
4 Jim Kelly 16 480 285 59.4 3593 22 17 83.3
5 Joe Montana 1 23 13 56.5 96 1 0 81.1
6 Johnny Unitas 7 198 110 55.6 1498 9 10 74
7 Peyton Manning 16 575 326 56.7 3739 26 28 71.2
8 Trent Edwards 9 269 151 56.1 1630 7 8 70.4
9 Joe Namath 9 340 164 48.2 2220 18 15 68.7
10 Steve Young 5 138 72 52.2 935 3 8 56.9
11 Eli Manning 7 197 95 48.2 1043 6 9 55.4
12 John Elway 10 259 123 47.5 1663 7 14 54.9
Y2
Rank Player GS Att Comp PCT Yards TD INT Rating
1 Dan Marino 16 564 362 64.2 5084 48 17 108.9
2 Big Ben 12 268 168 62.7 2385 17 9 98.6
3 Peyton Manning 16 533 331 62.1 4135 26 15 90.7
4 Johnny Unitas 12 301 172 57.1 2550 24 17 88
5 Joe Montana 7 273 176 64.5 1795 15 9 87.8
6 Trent Edwards 9 245 164 66.9 1845 7 7 86.9
7 Tom Brady 16 601 373 62.1 3764 28 14 85.7
8 Jim Kelly 12 419 250 59.7 2798 19 11 83.8
9 John Elway 14 380 214 56.3 2598 18 15 76.8
10 Eli Manning 16 557 294 52.8 3762 24 17 75.9
11 Steve Young 14 363 195 53.7 2282 8 13 65.5
12 Joe Namath 14 471 232 49.3 3379 19 27 62.6
The above numbers include the three game loosing streak. I continue to think that those last three games were lost because of extremely poor play-calling & extreme predictability which made Trent’s job almost impossible. Nonetheless, he is still sitting at 86.9 rating. It got me to thinking what his numbers were from the six games he played and they were:
2 Trent Edwards (first 6) 6 152 106 70% 1209 5 2 98.8
So if we exclude the last three games from the equasion he then ranks 2nd behind Dan Marino. Furthermore, in those 6 games he was sacked 11 times (152 attempts, so approx 7.5% of the pass attempts) whereas Marino was sacked 13 times in 16 games (564 attempts, so approx 1.9% of the pass attempts). I can’t stop but wonder how bad Marino’s numbers would have been behind a lousy line like ours. So what makes this so impressive is that he accomplished these stats with only 1 quality receiver, no O-Line, no running game, no tight End. Not even the great Tom Brady has ever had to deal with such factors, especially not in his second year!
I don’t know how scientific this analysis is but it sure shows that our guy is pretty dam good. Since before the Bye week we’ve been complaining that the play-calling is way too predictable and that the O-Line really really sucks this year, well even a great QB will eventually start to have problems in those circumstances and I believe that has been the problem the last few weeks.
So in my opinion we have definitely found our franchise QB
=======
On your second point I must admit that I have been critical recently because I like to watch aggressive defenses and ours isn’t. But what I failed to acknowledge is that we’ve improved in a lot of critical areas like third down conversions – so thanks for pointing it out.
On the offensive side, I don’t care what the stats are because we have not used our talent properly. It could have been so much better. They should have never given Trent to ability to change plays on the line, it’s too much for a rookie QB to process. I just hope that next year they KISS for him. He has so much potential and with Lynch/Jackson and Evans/Reed there is no reason for him to fail, we need to put him in a situation to succeed.
by keysh67 on Dec 10, 2008 8:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
** The stats are from a comment I made back on Nov 14th
Measuring Trent Edwards’ growth and maturation, by Brian Galliford
by keysh67 on Dec 10, 2008 8:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I really liked this post PD and I hope you put up more of them. It’s nice to read a well thought out and uplifting post right now and we could use a bit more of them. kaisertown alluded to what a good segment you did on the defense and to tell you the truth you certainly opened my eyes.
kaiser wrote that too may fans
rip on Fewell everytime this team gives up a first down
(ok maybe i’m over using the pink box a little (hehe I’m sorry im sorry immature I know I can’t help it)) And I’ll admit it, maybe its because that 3rd down completion percentage is down over the last 2 weeks, when I’ve been watching games recently I’ve been pretty mad at the defense for giving up 3rd downs on what seemed like everyone they faced. But stats don’t lie. So kudos to you for teaching me something today.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Dec 10, 2008 9:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Poz, the Bills were a first down debacle in the first half against Miami. I think I oversimplified with my statements. The real problem is when people see three or four bad plays, they suddenly assume that it has been a problem all year, but really third down pass defense had been something Buffalo was great at all year prior to Sunday.
by kaisertown on Dec 10, 2008 11:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me try to poke a few holes in your arguements
Edwards – I hope Edwards is able to prove he can be a starting QB in the AFC EAST. Maybe if he was playing in a southern climate in a dome there would be no debate. I am hoping for the best, but I am not buying this cow until he proves he can make ice cream! Either way, we need to draft a youngster to develop and bring in a vet to compete with Edwards and hopefully be our #2 QB.
3rd downs – Maybe the reason for this stat is because teams only need two downs to get 10yds? Again, I am to lazy to look it up, but IMO time of possession, yards given up per game, and points allowed are the three best indicators of how good a defense is. You mention we are doing better with YPG, but you do not say how we rank in the NFL. Does anyone have those stats?
20 + plays – Why take the chance of going deep when we play our CBs 10 yds off. Take the low risk short to intermediate range stuff and put together 6-8 minute drives. Wear the defense down and run it down their throats in the 4th quarter. Sound familiar?
by Joe P. on Dec 10, 2008 9:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe if he was playing in a southern climate in a dome there would be no debate.
I think it would still be very debatable. I also don’t think Trent’s performance in bad weather is any worse or more inconsistant than his performance in normal fall weather.
I am hoping for the best, but I am not buying this cow until he proves he can make ice cream!
I am slightly more optimistic than you are, but only slightly. I think Trent has what it takes. I’m not sure if Trent really has what it takes to be a guy who wins playoff games though. Hopefully we find out a lot about him next year, for better or for worse.
Either way, we need to draft a youngster to develop and bring in a vet to compete with Edwards and hopefully be our #2 QB.
A vet and a rookie? I think Buffalo wants to keep Hamden around to hang out and be buddy buddy with Trent. That only leaves one roster spot for a QB. I would prefer a veteran, but if Kerry Collins, Gus Frerotte and Charlie Batch wind up elsewhere, I would prefer draft a 4-5 round rookie over guys like Alex Smith, Rex Grossman and Kyle Boller. If Buffalo could only grab one, would you prefer a rookie or a vet FA?
I am to lazy to look it up, but IMO time of possession, yards given up per game, and points allowed are the three best indicators of how good a defense is.
I actually think those are three stats that don’t tell the whole story. They have too many external factors to be good stats (other than maybe points per game). The best stats to tell how a defense is performing is average yards allowed per pass play and average yards allowed per run play. Both put Buffalo’s defense right in the middle of the pack.
by kaisertown on Dec 11, 2008 12:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have said that I would like Alex Smith
I think competition at every position is essential to getting the most out of players. Edwards needs someone to really push him for the job, not someone like Hamdan or a mostly washed up QB. Once the decision is made, stick with that starter even through the rough games. This is one thing I give Juaron credit for. I am glad he didn’t pull Edwards in games he struggled.
by Joe P. on Dec 11, 2008 10:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
All valid arguments
I do actually have some of the stats you’re looking for, and generally I think they support what’s said above (not to say that there isn’t plenty of work still to do). Here’s a couple of more pertinent ones:
Total yards per play: 5.2. Seems like a lot, but its actually good enough to rank 13th in the league. Not too mention better than several presumedly playoff bound teams (Jets, Dolphins, Falcons, Patriots, Broncos and Cardinals). We’re clearly not an elite defense, but we may very well have a playoff caliber one.
Time of Possession: This generally averages a draw between the Bills and their opponents (30.03 Bills to 29.57 Opponents). Its good for only 18th in the league, so there definitely is a good statisical argument to be made for those long drives (tempered somewhat by yards per play, and total yards stats). I think that at least some of that can be chalked up to a below average offense (23rd overall). The change from last year is positive, (opponents held the ball 31:09 on average last year), but I think some of the difference probably comes from the offense not being quite so bad as last year.
Yards Per Game: We’re currently 11th in the league and ahead of the Jets, Colts, Dolphins, Panthers, Patriots, Bears, Falcons, and Broncos.
As for most of the info about Trent, thats of course my subjective opinion. The jury is still definitely out, I’m just cautioning against drawing conclusions too soon.
by PozDispenser on Dec 11, 2008 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
NFL.com has a great section of sortable stats.
by kaisertown on Dec 11, 2008 2:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
nice post!
i got a huge grin on my face when i read your name!!!
very nice post. it’s good to see something positive and see something to grow on in the future. the negativity has been giving me ogeda (spelling?) lately.
also, i was watching this show on travel channel tonight about bar foods and of course they featured buffalo wings and anchor bar. well, as the owner of the place was saying, “people remember buffalo for three things: cold weather, losing four super bowls (with the bills symbol and a sign saying ‘five times a charm’ – by the way, not correct grammar by them), and buffalo wings.” my friends all start hootin and hollerin at me and i bug out. the bills are everyone’s doormat and i’m sick of it. goodnight.
by BenAllen on Dec 11, 2008 1:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
nice post
Did you see that they plan to raise Metrocard prices 28%? My monthly subway pass is now going to be $104….f that!! Oh how I feel your pain my friend….
~K
by Kurupt on Dec 11, 2008 2:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Defense:
3rd Down percentage: 36%.
20+ Yard Completions: 28.
Yards Per Carry: 4.0.
not bad not great – my only issue is with the competition we have played. next year will be a much better barometer of where we are at. Lets see how we do against Indy, Ten, Saints, Falcons, TB – all of these teams probably have bettter offenses than the Bills have played this year save for the Cards.
we all said this was the year because of cup cake schedule – lets make sure we think about that while evaluating how this team has improved.
Completion Percentage: 65.1% – i like this stat
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Dec 11, 2008 9:18 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thats something I've given a lot of thought to...
…and I’ve gone both ways on it. We’ve faced a lot of bad offenses, and a lot of them that were worse than expected. On the other hand, we’ve faced a lot of offenses that were much better than expected (Jets and Dolphins jump to mind-14th and 10th in yards per game, the Jets are 5th in scoring).
But the concern is how we performed against the best offense we faced: Arizona (5th) and NE (8th). They were 20/33 on 3rd down (61%) and combined for 743 yards. It didn’t help that we turned the ball over 6 times in those games, but still. I think we’ll find out a lot from Denver.
by PozDispenser on Dec 11, 2008 1:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
On the other hand, we’ve faced a lot of offenses that were much better than expected (Jets and Dolphins jump to mind-14th and 10th in yards per game, the Jets are 5th in scoring).
remember – they basically play the same cupcake schedule as we do
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Dec 11, 2008 4:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But the concern is how we performed against the best offense we faced: Arizona (5th) and NE (8th).
this is my issue – against the top 12 (playoff teams or playoff calibre) we are not good. which is why i don’t like Fewell. I don’t care that he can keep the bottom 15 teams in check, i care about keeping the top 15 teams in check.
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Dec 11, 2008 4:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree: we’ve struggled against elite offenses. I suppose my point is that, so have most defenses. We’re definitely not elite, but I firmly believe that the D has played well enough to keep us in every game except the Cardinals game (and frankly if the offense hadn’t played lights out, the Chiefs game).
Hopefully we can add a few pieces next year (I’m looking at you pass rushing DE!) that we can get over the hump. Also, it would help if we could force some turnovers.
by PozDispenser on Dec 11, 2008 6:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The only issue with dismissing the Jets and Dolphins because of their schedule, is that you would have to dismiss New England as well. Remember, the Jets hung 34 on a Titans D that was ranked I believe 3rd in the league, and was rolling through a ten game winning streak. The Dolphins gained 359 yards on the Ravens D (which is the most they’ve allowed this year, more than the Giants, Colts and Texans). So I’m not willing to quite dismiss them.
by PozDispenser on Dec 11, 2008 6:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no no your right – i just don’t think their good enough. just need a few more playmakers. maybe then i’ll be sold on Fewell – but nothing to date sells me on the guy after watching him the past 3 years. still does things that bother the heck out of me. such as playing our corners 10 yds off the ball. but i’m glad that he’s ending the ko simpson experiment and has thrown scott at SS.
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Dec 12, 2008 8:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt. Scott has been the best player in the secondary for most of the season. I’m with on the way he plays the corners off, although I think he knows we can’t generate rush with our down four and is trying to limit the damage. He still uses that to a ridiculous extent.
by PozDispenser on Dec 12, 2008 5:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great stats
I love numbers and stats PD. This is right in my wheelhouse. Rec’d.
by MattRichWarren on Dec 11, 2008 2:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Can anyone compare these stats to '06?
Lets not forget we were actually closest the playoffs that year, the FIRST year DIck got here. Do the stats show a trend of improvement for all 3 years or just over last year. If the first is true, maybe an argument can be made that we should keep Dick for one more year.
GO BLUE!!!
by Kumario! on Dec 11, 2008 5:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
http://www.nfl.com/stats/team?seasonId=2006&seasonType=REG&Submit=Go
Have at it boss… They have it all the way back to 1932.
by MattRichWarren on Dec 11, 2008 7:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs



























