Comparing first-year offensive coordinators in 2008 - Turf Show Times
This is why SB Nation rocks, folks. Code name "taiko" at Turf Show Times, our Rams blog, put together a comparison of first-year offensive coordinators in 2008 with the purpose of pointing out how awful Al Saunders has been in St. Louis this year. It worked, but a side effect was that it gives us a good look at Turk Schonert's first year on the job. Check it out and discuss.
11 months ago
Brian Galliford
35 comments
1 recs |
Comments
O.K.
Hate the fact that Mularkey is at the top of that list.
Like the fact that Turk is better than SFM
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Dec 4, 2008 12:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is a bit of an apples-and-orange comparison since the three teams listed here at the top – the Falcons, Ravens, and Dolphins – also have new QB’s (as well as new head coaches as the post points out). But I do agree with taiko’s assessment “that the new coordinators that are having the most immediate success are the ones that have been most creative and most successful in the running game.”
by Zumone on Dec 4, 2008 12:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Kind of a flawed argument there. Success, or lack thereof, is due to many factors, not just the OC’s. OL play, QB play, skill position talent, how bad their team’s D is, weather, etc etc etc have all impacted those numbers.
It is good to see numbers like that, but I still don’t see our offense as being significantly better than last year’s. In fact, it’s pretty much equal in my book. 6-6 at this point, just like last year, and wins are all that matter. Our passing numbers have improved, but the run game is hurting. That guy is right that the running games are leading those teams at the top of his list….
~K
by Kurupt on Dec 4, 2008 12:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thats what I find most frustrating. We go from OK run game and bad passing game last year to bad running game and OK passing game. Can’t these guys walk and chew gum at the same time?
by Zumone on Dec 4, 2008 1:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, K, but you also have to factor in the SIGNIFICANT improvement of our division. Miami and the Jets have 15 wins this season, three times the 5 they put up last year.
I agree it’s flawed, but obviously, there’s been progress. You have to remember that we’re talking about one of the worst offenses in the history of the league (not to mention the franchise) when we’re talking about the ’07 Bills.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Dec 4, 2008 1:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
doesn't that inflate Turk's stats?
By taking over one of the worst offenses in history last year any of us could have brought about improvement.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Dec 4, 2008 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It certainly does, which is why you can’t take these stats at face value. Clearly, Schonert’s been bad, but we can’t make the argument that there hasn’t been improvement.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Dec 4, 2008 1:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m a bit confused, what does Miami and the Jets have to do with our offensive production? We’ve only had 2 games against them and stunk up the joint.
There has been a little bit of progress, but we’re still a pretty bad offensive team. We’ve still got too many of the issues we’ve seen for years…
~K
by Kurupt on Dec 4, 2008 1:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m saying that take out the NFC East (last year) and factor in the improved AFC East (this year) and we’re talking about the same level of competition. And we’re better.
I never said we were anything other than a mediocre offensive team, but this proves that there has been progress. If Turk ever figures out how to remove his head from his arse, we could be average!
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Dec 4, 2008 1:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well that's the problem isn't it?
Until said cranial-rectal extraction procedure takes place, I remain skeptical.
by Zumone on Dec 4, 2008 1:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pop!!!
That’s the sound off Turk removing……nevermind
There is only one NFL football team that plays in New York state...and Canada?
by MonStarr_716 on Dec 5, 2008 1:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Would you like me to bring
back the “Turk” avatar?
by Joe P. on Dec 5, 2008 1:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
wouldn’t be opposed to the idea….
There is only one NFL football team that plays in New York state...and Canada?
by MonStarr_716 on Dec 5, 2008 7:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What is the turn-over + - compared to last year?
Bills Fan in PA
by BILLS on Dec 4, 2008 1:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
If I'm reading the stats correctly
the Bills currently have a -5 turnover differential – ranking in the bottom 20s. Last year we had a +9 turn-over differential which ranked 6th in the league.
by Zumone on Dec 4, 2008 1:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and
It appears that when we do turnover it leads to a TD or FG, point being we may have improved in the PPG and YPG stats but if there is a 14 swing in turnovers it’s got to kill you. If we hadn’t had those turnovers we would not be at 6-6 I think this may be the biggest reason for the slide.
Bills Fan in PA
by BILLS on Dec 4, 2008 1:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yep, I’ve been saying that for a couple of months now. Poor play-calling and coaching and execution and blah blah blah can be blamed, but we haven’t lost any game during this skid of ours by more than 10 points. Without turnovers, we have more wins. It’s really quite simple.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Dec 4, 2008 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think
we could have overcome the bad playcalling, coaching and execution if we were 5 and not-14. I can still see that 90 yard interception for a TD in the Jets game
Bills Fan in PA
by BILLS on Dec 4, 2008 3:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think
we have to be careful with the OC and play calling thing.
If we maintained a 0 turnover differential, we would have a much better record. As bad as play calling may be and I don’t think it is horrendous, it is not DJ or TS’s that’s fumbling the ball or throwing dumb interceptions or stretching out on a sneak to hand the ball over to the defense who runs it back for a TD.
Our coaches are undergoing major scrutiny because of the record and they deserve some heat. But they are good, even if conservative, and barring some of our dumb turnovers, we would be sporting a decent record.
With 4/5 turnovers, we almost won the Cleveland game. In the jets game, we had to long sustained drives and came away with no points. I’m not saying Turk can’t be more creative, etc, but the point is if the players play conservatively and with ball security in mind, we would have at least two more wins.
I think we should make Jauron and Turk walk the plank, but throwing them overboard would be crazy.
by Ono on Dec 4, 2008 3:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Let’s see…
Gary Crowton
John Shoop
Steve Fairchild
Turk Schonert
…Maybe we should have actually interviewed a few outside candidates rather than trusting Dick Jauron to make this important decision. Don’t give me this high horse crap about patience and the insulting idea that we hate him out of some simplistic frustration with his stoic demeanor either. People who care about the success of the Bills hate Dick Jauron because he’s completely inept. He doesn’t build a competent coaching staff, he doesn’t develop young quarterbacks, he doesn’t field an agressive defense, he doesn’t understand how to handle the injured reserve list, he doesn’t put up a fight against predetermined superior teams, he doesn’t handle timeouts properly, he doesn’t effectively handle the clock before the half or at the end of games, he doesn’t understand that “deferring” win you win the coin toss makes no sense in a game where the field is going to be smacked around by rain all day, he doesn’t win PERIOD. Don’t rip Schonert in one breath and defend Jauron in the next-0 that’s ass backwards anyway you look at it. Dick Jauron is completely inept and he drags down anyone and any team he comes in contact with. After three years of watching this clown, I understand why Hank Bullough brought Jauron into the league as a coach 23 years ago- to soemday get his name out of the Bills history books as the most inept head coach in franchise history. Mission accomplished.
by Benjamin Salem on Dec 4, 2008 8:57 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I like Dick Jauron but, I think he makes mistakes and is an average to below average HC. I feel like I am a constant defender of Jauron on this site though because of overreactions and I think your post is one of those.
the most inept head coach in franchise history.
Really, the worst coach in the history of the Buffalo Bills? I think he is better than Mularky and Williams were. Jim Ringo went 5-23 in the mid 70s. Harvey Johnson went 2-25. I think it’s funny when the anti-Jauron crowd does the one thing that Jauron never does, lets their emotions cloud their judgement.
he doesn’t develop young quarterbacks
Cade McNown, a player that Jauron had no say in drafting, busted big time. Books still out on Trent. I wouldn’t say Jauron has much of a track record either way. Jauron’s success here will be tied together with Trent and only time will tell what kind of player Edwards will be.
he doesn’t field an agressive defense
Neither does Monte Kiffin. I absolutely hate the aggresive defense comments from people. I know that Philly and the NYG are having success with blitz oriented 4-3 defenses. But Minnesota, Tampa and Indy all have pretty good defenses too despite not being aggressive enough. Some Jacksonville fans thought Mike Smith wasn’t aggressive enough. Gregg Williams has come in with his blitz happy aggressive defense and that defense has completely fallen apart. The Jags now give up an entire yard more per pass attempt. Atlanta on the other hand struggled with Bobby Petrino, Mike Zimmer and their aggressive scheme last year, but this season with the conservative Mike Smith, the entire defense is playing much better than last year.
he doesn’t understand how to handle the injured reserve list
So Buffalo puts Angelo Crowell on IR and they suddenly don’t know how to best utilize IR? What other examples can you give of Jauron putting a player (or not putting a player) on IR when you thought he shouldn’t have?
he doesn’t put up a fight against predetermined superior teams
I honestly think that is just ridiculous. The coaches and players try just as hard against the good teams as they do the bad teams. I know that New England completely dominated us last year, but when has this team not put up a good fight against an opponent that is considered to be elite? Dallas on Monday night, vs. SD and at Indy in 2006, and the Jets and Chargers games this year are all examples of close games against teams that the media and fans thought were better than we were.
he doesn’t handle timeouts properly
Dick Jauron has probably used timeouts when he shouldn’t have or had to waste one because of something he didn’t expect 3 or maybe 4 times this year, but that is it. And that is totally normal for a head coach. Every coach screws up a few timeouts a season, its just reality. Schonert not getting the plays in quick enough is the reason Buffalo has wasted so many timeouts this year.
he doesn’t effectively handle the clock before the half or at the end of games
He isn’t great with clock management, but I don’t think he is that bad either. Clock management is one of those things that every coach gets ripped apart for at some point of every season. When have the Bills really mishandled the clock under Jauron?
he doesn’t understand that "deferring" win you win the coin toss makes no sense in a game where the field is going to be smacked around by rain all day
I guess even defering has become a problem for people these days. I’ve heard plenty of analysts that talk about a wet field as an advantage for the offense.
by kaisertown on Dec 4, 2008 10:26 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Kaiser,
he is right in certain respects and most of us can certainly understand his frustration. it does seem to me like your attacking him though.
DJ isn’t great at anything. we all know that. and he has his weaknesses which have been pointed out consistently on this site.
I know your trying to put your side of it. but he isn’t great at a lot of things, if anything at all. He’s not as terrible at those things as Ben points out…but far from great at them. he’s just mediocre at them. i just think he’s a little pissed at the current situation and needed to vent a little. i’ve done it thats for sure.
i guess we can all agree that we want DJ to succeed and just hope he gets better at the areas in which he isn’t that great at.
my 2 cents
by J2 on Dec 5, 2008 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn’t trying to attack. I will admit I get a little argumentative and love a good debate. Salem is a big boy and he can handle himself (as seen below). The only time I felt like I was really attacking his statement was the thing about how we don’t have an aggressive defense and that is just because those statements drive me nuts. I guess I was pretty tough on the “we don’t put up a fight against teams that have been "predetermined” to be better" line too, but I felt like I should’ve been. I really do think that is a wild accusation and is just plain stupid.
by kaisertown on Dec 6, 2008 1:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see you like how Dick Jauron runs this team. I couldn’t disagree any more completely, but as a fellow diehard Bills fan (which I assume you are if you’re still painstakingly analyzing this doormat of a team as we reach our 9th consecutive season without a postseason game), you’re opinion is certainly valid. Just for the sake of my sanity, I have to counter your points, however…
1.) So Jim Ringo and Harvey Johnson had worse records than Dick Jauron? So what? As all the Dick Jauron apologists continue to point out, coaches have nothing to do with a team’s record and apparently, Jauron’s mediocre record stems from nothing more than mediocre players. I’m not sure what to make of those isolated science experiments in Tampa, Atlanta, Miami, Baltimore, etc, but that’s the company line anyway…
2.) I don’t care that he didn’t draft McNown. I don’t care that he didn’t draft Losman. All I know is that he and his coaching staff whiffed on developing two first round QBs and so far, the somewhat talented Trent Edwards is flopping around like a dead fish after 22 NFL starts. Jauron apologists can continue to make the excuses that the personnel he’s been entrusted with is inheritantly flawed, but at what point does Jauron, himself, become the smoking gun that ties all this offensive ineptitude of nine separate NFL seasons together? That place in time has already come and gone in my opinion.
3.) The Crowell situation would be laughable if I didn’t have so much emotionally invested in the team that Dick Jauron runs. Paul Posluszny openly wondered why he was placed on injured reserve last year when he could have secured some valuable experience late last season (and God knows, he looks like he could have used it so far in 2008). Is it nitpicking to wonder why he needlessly forces valuable players off the roster for 4-5 games a season each year so that he keep the likes of Xavier Omon, Leon Joe, Gibran Hamdan, Jason Jefferson, Demetrius Bell, or any of the other players he’s kept aboard over the last two years who don’t make any contribution during the season? Maybe. But it’s the little things that Jauron doesn’t do that add up to his complete and total ineptitude.
4.) Look, Jauron’s Bills have never beaten a team that had a winning record at the start of the contest in three seasons as far as I can remember. In a league of parity, that’s a complete joke. His comments like “we don’t match up well with the Patriots” and “we’ll just try to keep the game close against the Patriots” are wildly telling statements about Jauron’s mindset. He defers to more highly respected teams and his players seem to (naturally) follow his lead. Go ahead and trivialize my viewpoint here with comments about me wanting a coach that throws chairs and spits or whatever, but Jauron’s record against winning teams speaks for itself. Why shouldn’t he be held accountable for the several totally flat performances against the league’s better teams?
5.) The timeout and clock management issues are borderline insane with Dick Jauron. How many times has Buffalo had to blow timeouts because they were late getting a play in at critical junctures in the game? How about the strange decision to pass up the field goal and instead throw a hail mary with our playoff lives on the line on Christmas Eve back in ‘06 against Tennessee? How about the debacles against Cleveland the last two years (screen pass on 4th and goal from the 6 last year, settling for a 47 yarder this year?). I’m sorry, but for a head coach of nine seasons, these rookie clock management mistakes are rather pathetic.
5.) Jauron’s preference to defer when he wins the toss speaks loudly to his character. He prefers to “defer” in just about any situation. As a coach who lets alleged “better teams” push his team around, who let’s bad weather become a passable excuse for his starting QB to curl up into the fetal position, and whose apologists continue to vigorously support with the allegation that Jauron can’t win because his players are so obviously mediocre, it just seems like Jauron lets the external dictate to him rather than making an attempt to work on the things he CAN control to guide this team to a better place. It’s just the wrong mindset for the leader of an NFL team in my opinion.
Go ahead and make excuses for the guy; people have been doing that for Jauron for three seasons in Buffalo, and as you were so happy to lend me, there’s always a counterpoint to any external criticism from the stands. But let me ask you Jauron apologists this: since you guys are so quick to defend any of Jauron’s perceived inadequacies, what exactly are the tangible things that Dick Jauron actual brings to the table and does WELL? To me, it seems like Jauron’s apologists play a more aggressive defense than anything I’ve seen out of Perry Fewell’s units these past three years; do you guys have the firepower to go on the offense with more conviction than Shoop, Crowton, Fairchild, or Schonert? I’d love to read your thoughts.
Go Bills,
Ben
by Benjamin Salem on Dec 5, 2008 11:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL – Ben I was trying to calm down the situation. hahaha regardless good job on not standing down.
I guess the only thing that I will say is that I also would like to know what he does WELL. What are his strengths? What does he do that other coaches must take into consideration when game planning against a DJ team?
I guess everyone on the team liking him is a strength. Past that…..i’m not too sure what he brings to the table.
Again…regardless….we all want him to succeed because we’re sick losing. so heres to hoping he can fix his problems and get us all circling again
by J2 on Dec 5, 2008 11:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bills Beating Winning Teams
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/afceast/0-4-473/Bills-unable-to-beat-winners-since-1999.html
Bills vs. Winning Teams
Year vs. opponents w/winning record vs. opponents w/even, losing record
2000 1-7 7-1
2001 1-6 2-7
2002 4-4 4-4
2003 0-6 6-4
2004 3-5 6-2
2005 3-5 2-6
2006 3-5 4-4
2007 1-7 6-2
2008 0-2 6-4
TOTAL 16-47 43-34
clearly its not all on DJ as this has been happening for a while, but he is definately not helping the situation as far as winning against teams with a .500 record and above.
these stats are not good……not good
by J2 on Dec 5, 2008 11:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that what Kaiser was trying to say is that the overreaction is a little out of control. I mean some of this is going a little far.
So Jim Ringo and Harvey Johnson had worse records than Dick Jauron? So what? As all the Dick Jauron apologists continue to point out, coaches have nothing to do with a team’s record and apparently, Jauron’s mediocre record stems from nothing more than mediocre players.
When has any body ever said that Dick Jauron is a tremendous coach who is trying to do the best he can with average to poor talent? I’ve never read that. The point Kaiser was making here is that D.J. is clearly not the worst coach is Bills history as you claimed.
His comments like "we don’t match up well with the Patriots" and "we’ll just try to keep the game close against the Patriots" are wildly telling statements about Jauron’s mindset. He defers to more highly respected teams and his players seem to (naturally) follow his lead.
To think that when D.J. says that stuff, the players hear it and think “Jeez, if coach thinks we’re not going to win, we probably aren’t”, is just plain silly. You obviously have never heard a Lou Holtz press confrence. When Lou was at Notre Dame, they could be ranked in the top 10 and be playing Akron, and Lou would make it sound like his team would be lucky if they successfully kicked a field goal. I think that everyone has to trust that what D.J. tells the media and what he tells the players are two different things and that the players are smart enough to know which one to listen to.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Dec 5, 2008 11:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that what Kaiser was trying to say is that the overreaction is a little out of control.
are you saying that people are overreacting? no way…….i haven’t seen that one bit ;)
by J2 on Dec 5, 2008 12:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here we go with the “Jauron apologists” crap, just like “Losman supporters” and all that other camp crap. Can’t people just have an opinion? Do they have to be sequestered into some evil entity that must be destroyed?
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Dec 5, 2008 12:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess when you have giant mutated turtles on your team they need an evil entity that must be destroyed.
by XtrmeCarnage82 on Dec 5, 2008 12:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see you like how Dick Jauron runs this team.
Not really, I just don’t hate the guy. I tried to preface my last post by saying that I only defend Jauron because I think people go way too far with the overreactions. I even called the guy a below average coach. I’m only a Jauron apologist when I feel people are being unrealistically harsh and/or bash his defensive philosophies.
(which I assume you are if you’re still painstakingly analyzing this doormat of a team as we reach our 9th consecutive season without a postseason game),
haha, fair assumption.
Sireric is right, my use of Ringo and Johnson’s records were just my way of saying that Jauron is not “the most inept coach” in the history of the Bills. I’m a big fan of accuracy and I typically nitpick (sometimes even overreact myself), when I think someone exaggerates to make a point. Do you really think Jauron is worse than Mularky?
I don’t care that he didn’t draft McNown. I don’t care that he didn’t draft Losman
I think McNown would have busted for any team with any coach. He just didn’t have an NFL arm and was doomed to failure from the start. Jauron gave the starting nod to Shane Matthews and only played McNown when Matthews got hurt (which was often) and McNown struggled through a bunch of injuries himself. Jauron even had to turn to Jim Miller a bunch of times because none of his QBs could stay healthy.
Losman wasn’t only not drafted by Jauron, he spent 2 years not improving before Jauron even got here. Losman had a not terrible year as a starter under Jauron in 2006 where he averaged 1.2 more yards per pass attempt than he did in 2005. Losman’s failures are unrelated to Jauron.
It is a fair criticism to say that Trent isn’t really improving all that much under Jauron and co. If Trent doesn’t improve next year, it will time to say goodbye to both DJ and Edwards.
Poz suffered a 10+ week injury during the second week of the year. I don’t think getting 4 or 5 games out of him with one of his arm’s at 70% strength was a move that any head coach would make. Maybe that’s just me though.
Jauron is 4-14 against teams that are above .500. I agree that is pretty awful, but it isn’t like this team just rolls over and dies against strong opponents. And Jauron said we don’t match up well with the Pats, because well …. we don’t match up well with the Pats; in fact, we couldn’t have matched up any worse against them when he said it. They ran a 3-4 WR shutgun offense and the Bills had no depth in the secondary and a poor pass rush from the D-Line. They had one of the best OLs in the league blocking for the best Quarterback in the league. They run a 3-4 with one of the better NTs in the league and some great MLBs. Buffalo’s OL was strong on the outside and got weaker towards the middle. NE’s weakness, secondary depth is tough to exploit when you don’t have depth at WR or TE. We had a rookie QB going up against one of the better defensive schemers in the league. Lee Evans had never had any success against Asante Samuel. New England’s team was like the perfect storm of matchup nightmares compared to Buffalo’s team last season. So Jauron saying “we don’t match up well with New England” to the media isn’t the same thing as saying, we have predetermined that we are not going to win and are therefore not going to try to win. That is just ridiculous.
"we’ll just try to keep the game close against the Patriots"
Jauron never said that. Are you trying to remember some of his quotes about how Buffalo is going to have to play one of their best games to keep the game close? I don’t remember exactly how he was wording it, but those two quotes are entirely different.
He defers to more highly respected teams
Jauron was simply saying with those quotes about the Pats, that you have to play better to beat the good teams than you do the bad teams. What could possibly be wrong about that mindset?
How many times has Buffalo had to blow timeouts because they were late getting a play in at critical junctures in the game?
We have an offensive coordinator that isn’t decisive and regularly gets playcalls into Trent a few seconds late. Don’t pin that on Jauron.
the strange decision to pass up the field goal and instead throw a hail mary
That was a strange decision, although I was at that game and Lindell probably wasn’t going to make that kick. The screen pass against Cleveland was a play that Jauron didn’t call. The head coach has to take some responsibility about calls like that, but it is like the SF situation this year when they ran the FB dive at the goal line and Singletary threw Martz under the bus. The head coach doesn’t call the plays. I had no problem with running the ball all three times this year against Cleveland. The running game was literally more succesful (more yards per play) than the passing game was. The calls shouldn’t have been dives up the middle, but if Jauron told Turk to run the ball 3 times than I have no problem with that. The problem wasn’t that we ran it three times, it was that we only gained 2 yards. If those runs gain us 6 yards (still not exactly an optimistic guess) than it is a 43 yard FG. That wouldn’t have been considered too conservative of a strategy had the OL not completely choked. And my whole point was that you are going to waste a few timeouts every year. You are going to make some bad choices. There aren’t any coaches in the NFL who don’t get second guessed by the diehards every week.
Jauron’s preference to defer when he wins the toss speaks loudly to his character.
No it doesn’t. Bill Belichick defers every week too. It’s sound strategy and I think in a couple seasons you will see that teams who defer have more success and that most coaches will eventually defer. In college about 65% of teams defer and that percentage goes up a little every year.
by kaisertown on Dec 6, 2008 3:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was beautiful....
I’m rec’ing it….
I couldn’t have said it better myself and I’ve tried dozens of times…
~K
by Kurupt on Dec 5, 2008 12:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You’re an angry elf, Nick.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Dec 5, 2008 6:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Give Mularkey & Cameron extra credit…
They’re doing it with rookie QB’s….
There is only one NFL football team that plays in New York state...and Canada?
by MonStarr_716 on Dec 4, 2008 10:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs





















