Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Lost

Potential Bills Free Agent: LB Lance Briggs

Briggs seems poised to re-sign with the Bears (Photo Source)

It's a name that has enticed Buffalo Bills fans for over a calendar year. For a Bills team that is in need of playmakers wherever they can find them, fans have continually pleaded the organization to make a move for this linebacker. He has experience in the Cover-2, he's been a key cog on a team that made a trip to the Super Bowl, and he's once again the elite name amongst free agent linebackers.

I speak, of course, of the Chicago Bears' Lance Briggs. The 27-year old veteran has enjoyed four straight 100+ tackles with the Bears, and has developed into a star on one of the quickest, most menacing defenses in the league (up until last season, at least). But just how available is Briggs? When a player this elite becomes available, demand is high. What would it take to get Briggs into a Bills uniform - and is it even a good decision to do that?

Windy City Gridiron's Take
WCG, head blogger at Windy City Gridiron, has been following Briggs' career - and more importantly, his recent tiff with Bears management over his contract - very closely. When I asked him to provide some insight into Briggs' play from 2007 and his free agent status, he graciously obliged - and his responses shed some light into Briggs' future...

After some issues last off-season, how do you think Briggs performed on the field? Did he show any attitude issues toward the organization?

Briggs was all that and more. He was arguably our best defensive player this year. Briggs made some dumb comments while trying to get a new contract, but at no time did he ever disorient his team. Every one of them, to a man, was behind him. He made a deal with management and he honored it and never said a word. I don't think anybody on the team, management or many fans have anything negative to say about Briggs. He has shown himself to be a very good teammate.

Is Briggs as good as advertised, or do you see his production as a product of working with the likes of Tommie Harris and Brian Urlacher?

Going into this season the attitude of most Bears fans was 'screw him and his greedy agent', or 'he is just another product of a good linebacker who became great because he played next to Urlacher', but we have made a 180 on that by year's end. Urlacher was playing hurt for a majority of the year and really wasn't 100% until the last 3-4 games of the season and he showed it. In the meantime, Briggs was the foundation of the defense. He played as well or better than any other linebacker in the league. He is worth every penny of whatever team signs him gives him.

Do you think there's any chance that Briggs returns to Chicago?

Absolutely! I would say looking at the current landscape the chances are better than 50%. Urlacher is getting toward the older years and had some neck surgery in the off season. This might make Briggs' planned successor Jamar Williams a needed backup in the middle. The Bears released Muhsin Muhammad, Fred Miller and Darwin Walker and names like Ricky Manning Jr. and Adam Archuleta are also possible targets. I think a lot of that has to do with re-signing players. They have sent a revised contract offer to Briggs and his agent, Drew Rosenhaus. I think Briggs would like to stay in Chicago, he just wants a contract that he thinks he is worth.

Discussion Time
Personally, I don't think there's much discussion to be had here. Clearly, Briggs is a superior NFL talent, plays with great physicality for the Cover-2 defense, and could probably play any linebacker position in that scheme. He is an ideal fit for the Bills. Unfortunately, he's an ideal fit for the Bears, too - and the Bears seem on the verge of re-signing him. If contract talks between the Bears and Briggs break down, then we've got a discussion on our hands. But as it stands right now (and as WCG alluded to), the thought of Briggs being in a Bills uniform may just be a dream.

Bears LB Lance Briggs
Year G Tk Sk INT FF FR
2003 16 78 0 1 0 0
2004 16 126 1 1 0 0
2005 16 107 2 2 2 0
2006 16 134 1 2 4 0
2007 14 103 2 0 2 0
TOT 78 548 6 6 8 0

0 recs  |  Comment 10 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Well
that just confirmed what most of us already thought.  Briggs is going to get one of the two or three biggest contracts out of all the free agents this year.  There is no way Buffalo signs this guy regardless of whether or not he resigns with Chicago.

If Chicago were to cut Ricky Manning Jr. he would be someone worth talking about.

by kaisertown on Feb 19, 2008 6:46 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Re: Manning Jr.
On it. On Archuleta, too, as I think he'd make excellent reserve safety/special teams help...

As far as Briggs goes, he's still a name that pops up occasionally in Bills discussions. I think this article sort of (finally) puts Briggs discussions to rest.

But boy, would he be a great addition for this defense...

Create a free account to join in the discussion, Bills fans!

by Brian Galliford on Feb 19, 2008 6:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

don't get your hopes up
I doubt Briggs will be out of our dreams until either he signs somewhere else, or the Bills fill the LB opening with somebody else. I guess he shouldn't until he is gone.
Man do I miss #78

by sireric on Feb 19, 2008 8:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
obviously it is a pointless conversation until they are actually cut.  Manning does have a bit of a reputation as a ballhawk.  He would definately rate below the Florence's and Kelly's of the world, but he could be a solid option.  I couldn't like Adam Archuleta much less.  He is too slow to play the cover 2.  He is basically a fourth linebacker out there.

by kaisertown on Feb 19, 2008 9:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ricky Manning
yes, Archuleta NO!!!!  He is the ultimate tease.

Thinks about Lovie Smith is the only coach who has ever gotten anything out of this guy and he couldn't do it this time.  Arch was benched for rookies.  Stay the hell away from him.  He has no special teams value.

by WCG on Feb 20, 2008 9:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Guys dont be downers,
this is the type of signing, imo that could significantly make our team better, regardless of the money.

He is an elite player, imo, and would love to have him.  Honestly, as the Texas Rangers owner says"we will only spend big bucks on special elite players."  This should be our thinking also.  There is only so much bargain shopping you can do.

Im sure not everyone will agree with my thinking, but if you are going to open your wallet to an elite player, Briggs would definitly fill that bill.  Put it this way, better him then a wilford or hackett, etc.  Not so much elite players that are going to demand a good chunk of change.

Do you BILLieve?

by NYTXFAN on Feb 19, 2008 8:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Tom Hicks
Isn't he the same guy who tossed tons of cash at Chan Ho Park?
I wouldn't say I'm being a downer, just pragmatic. The Bears aren't letting him go, Urlacher is getting old, and has had a few injuries lately they aren't going to risk losing them both.
Man do I miss #78

by sireric on Feb 19, 2008 8:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

At the time E,
the Chan Ho contract looked great.  Texas was getting a very very good pitcher, or at least everyone thought.  Chan Ho had just finished some very good seasons with the dodgers andTexas jumped on the oppertunity to sign him.  At the time the contract was big but compared to now his contract just looks like league minimum(LOL).

Dont forget, Mr Hicks also signed the best ball player in this era, ARod.  That contract was whack.  252 mil for 10 years.  You cant build a team around that.  But my point is you can allow yourself, the team, splurge on an oppertunity for the right player, like Briggs.

Do you BILLieve?

by NYTXFAN on Feb 20, 2008 6:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

downer
I prefer being realistic now and satisfied later to being starry eyed now and upset when the Bills don't sign a superstar and don't trade for anybody who has been to a pro bowl.

The Bills aren't going to be the only team to not make a drastic move.  There will be 3 superstars at most available when FA starts.  You hear a lot of trade rumors this time of year.  Football analysts don't have much else to report on and the willingness of teams to deal away their stars gets greatly exagerated.  for every team that adds an elite player through trade or FA there are 8 or so teams that don't.

by kaisertown on Feb 19, 2008 9:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Will everyone stop coddling
these players.  The NFL is the professional football league. These men are or are supposed to be professional athlets.  I don't know about any of you, but if my boss asks me to do something that is beyond more normal scope of work, I do it.  I don't get paid millions for that, these guys do.  Therefore, lets stop coddling them and demand that they play for what we are paying them to do.  I hate to say it, but even NE did it a few years back.  They are professional football players.  Let them all (league wide) start acting like it.  Clean up there off field activities, let them and make them play FOOTBALL.  Therefore, it takes the (all but truly elite) elite players out of the mix.  Get a true salary cap.  The range for safety is league minimum to $1,000,000.  The range for CB is league minimum to $4,000,000.  All per year.  Add achievable incentive bonus'.  Don't we have to achieve those results?  Aren't some bonuses achievable, while others are not?  What makes these so indispensble?  Do you really think that I any of "us" switch jobs tommorrow, our respective employers will close?  Absolutely not.  The Bills did not give up last year when they put 2X more players on IR than they had on the practice squad.  How many starters were in training camp?  How many signings of starters did they make?  How many players did they sign from (out of the air) because of need.  I have not mathematically calculated it, but my basic math instinct tells me that just short of half the entire entire starting team was not on the starting roster.  They turned over the practice squad how many times?  

Stop worringing about injuries, they happen, build a team.  Don't dismiss your proven players because they had a less than perfect year.  Fill holes.  Address shortcomings the best that you can and believe in your team.  

by btk0930 on Feb 19, 2008 9:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
To cheer, or not to cheer
Billsmagnetsquare_small
Draft confusion (and a poem! :D)
Small
Any relevent feedback would be nice
Nfl-toronto_small
some thoughts
Images_small
Bills Quarterbacks
279px-buffalo_bills_logo_svg_small
To be or Not to be?
T_edwards_070930_gallery_600_1__small
The 1st Thing Buffalo Should Do This Offseason
Small
You would think Jacksonville would move before Buffalo.
Small
Thanks Bills Fans (from a Jag fan)
Daffy_duck_small
As the merry-go-round turns: Bills coaching rumors and more

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Editor-in-Chief

Ronswanson_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Billsjaguars_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Nfl-toronto_small kaisertown