Buffalo Rumblings Authors Mock: Rounds 4, 5
Why do I love this blog? Because no matter what project we're undertaking, Buffalo Bills fans far and wide can bring each other down a peg. We're all equals here, and y'all have proven that through the first three days of this week as we've unveiled the Buffalo Rumblings Authors Mock. I applaud each and every one of you who have taken the time to share your thoughts on the Bills' roster over the past few days, and offer further applause to those of you who have taken the time to critique our mock selections intelligently. We encourage you to keep up the good work - we've had fun defending our selections (well, I've had fun reading your comments while on vacation, at least), and we're learning a lot as we plan to do a similar project much closer to draft day.
The first three rounds are in the books. Discussions on those selections have been outstanding. Here are our fourth and fifth round picks; once again, we can't wait to hear what y'all have got to say about not only these two selections, but each author's draft as a whole. Without further ado, we offer you rounds 4 and 5:
Brian Galliford's Picks
4-110. Gary Barnidge, TE, Louisville.
- Barnidge isn't an elite tight end talent, and weighing in at just 243 pounds, isn't likely to be a good in-line blocker at the pro level. What makes him an intriguing prospect is his height (6'6") and speed (4.65 40). He's a reliable target over the middle, and 17 career touchdowns means he's great in the red zone as well. This guy has "poor man's Jason Witten" written all over him - he can stretch the seam effectively, but isn't naturally athletic enough to be taken higher than Round 3. A potential steal who could do to Buffalo's offense what Kevin Boss did for the Giants last year.
5-135. Ezra Butler, LB, Nevada.
- Excellent timed speed (4.55 40) for his size (6'2", 245 pounds). Butler is an outstanding special teams player who would fit in well in any scheme at the pro level. He's also a terrific blitzer and plays very physically. He's not overly stout against the run and his block-sheding technique is pretty severely lacking, but he has enough raw talent to be a worthwhile project player. His special teams abilities make him an ideal replacement for Mario Haggan and Josh Stamer, though the Bills may have to reach for him in the fourth round to ensure they snag him.
Sireric's Picks
4-110. Earl Bennett, WR, Vanderbilt.
- I'm willing to bet this the lowest that anybody else will have the Bills taking a receiver. I'm also aware that Bennett isn't the biggest or fastest receiver in the draft, but he is the only one who has caught at least 75 passes the last three years. Bennett is one of those guys who isn't flashy so he's way down on everyone's draft board, but in three years I would be interested in seeing his numbers compared to every other receiver taken ahead of him.
5-135. Gary Barnidge, TE, Louisville.
- At 6'6" and 244 pounds, Barnidge is probably the most under-the-radar TE prospect in this draft. He's put up solid numbers the last 2 years (53/655 in '07 and 31/511 in '06), plus he ran a 4.63 40 at the Combine. He's got the size, speed and hands to be a solid TE at the pro level. Barnidge most likely won't have a huge impact as a rookie but could develop into a real find.
Jri111's Picks
4-110. Owen Schmitt, FB, West Virginia
- Here is a draft position that I had the hardest time to decide on. The last mock I did, I had DE Jason Jones from Eastern Michigan here. It seemed like a good fit at the time. Now, however, I go back to all the draft resources that I used then, and many of them have him rated a lot higher than they did two weeks ago (i.e. as a second or third rounder). If he's there in the forth, he's my guy, but I'm going on the assumption that he won't be. I really like Owen Schmitt and think he would be a great pick-up here. Some believe that FB here is a luxury pick; however, I don't see it that way. I think it's just the opposite. Think about it this way: who is going to get more playing time, a DE that is fourth on the depth chart? A CB that is fourth or fifth, or a receiver that is fifth? No - a FB who is starting will. Schmitt is tough and physical, and would be an excellent lead man for Lynch. He also could be an asset in the passing game as well.
5-135. Kory Lichtensteiger, C, Bowling Green.
- Here is a sobering fact for you: Four Bills offensive linemen are entering the last year of their contracts. That includes starter Marvin Fowler and top reserves Kirk Chambers, Duke Preston, and Jason Whittle. The Bills are arguably set at 4 of the 5 starting positions, but can improve in the middle. I would love Mike Pollak in the 3rd round; however, TE was a bigger need. Kory Litchenstegier is the next best option. He's smart, he's tough, and he's a leader. He actually possesses a lot of the same traits as a former Bills center Kent Hull. Not a bad guy to be compared to. The Bills need to start addressing O-line depth or one injury up front could be detrimental to the entire offense.
Kurupt's Picks
4-110. Jermichael Finley, TE, Texas
- I think the TE class is deep this year, but not overly impressive. By that I mean there is no sure-fire future Pro Bowler. There are a lot of niche players, whether they're known for being a strong blocker or receiving threat only. I had this pick narrowed down to a handful of tight ends: Finley, Jacob Tamme, Kellen Davis and Martin Rucker, all of whom would make sense here. I chose Finley because I think he's got the biggest receiving upside. I really expect the front office to target a TE with receiving skills first, and blocking ability as a bonus. Finley didn't run particularly well at the Combine, but he looks fluid and athletic in games. He's got nice hands and decent size. He may not be fully ready mentally to be a major impact right away, but down the line I really like what Finley could offer our offense in the passing game.
5-135. Dwight Lowery, CB, San Jose State
- I know this is probably a little late for this guy, but the CB position is pretty deep this year and he's a borderline Top-20 CB in this draft. Because he didn't run well at the Combine, I think there's a great chance of him being available at this point. Lowery has nice size at 5'11", 200 lbs, and above average ball skills. His lack of straight line speed may relegate him to a zone D only. I think he'd be a nice fit for our D. If Zack Bowman was available, I'd look at taking him too.
It's a long read, we're aware; we hope it's enlightening and valuable information for y'all as well. To get everyone up to speed, here's how each author has drafted throughout the first five rounds:
1-11. Limas Sweed, WR, Texas
2-42. Jason Jones, DE, Eastern Michigan
3-71. Tyvon Branch, CB, Connecticut
4-110. Gary Barnidge, TE, Louisville
5-135. Ezra Butler, LB, Nevada
sireric
1-11. Derrick Harvey, DE, Florida
2-42. Reggie Smith, DB, Oklahoma
3-71. Josh Johnson, QB, San Diego
4-110. Earl Bennett, WR, Vanderbilt
5-135. Gary Barnidge, TE, Louisville
jri111
1-11. Limas Sweed, WR, Texas
2-42. Brandon Flowers, CB, Virginia
3-71. Dustin Keller, TE, Purdue
4-110. Owen Schmitt, FB, West Virginia
5-135. Kory Lichtensteiger, C, Bowling Green
Kurupt
1-11. Derrick Harvey, DE, Florida
2-42. Antoine Cason, CB, Arizona
3-71. Jordy Nelson, WR, Kansas State
4-110. Jermichael Finley, TE, Texas
5-135. Dwight Lowery, CB, San Jose State
We're getting deep into this thing, and there's still plenty to discuss - mostly from a strategy standpoint, in terms of how each author has approached filling Buffalo's remaining needs. Again, feel free to pick favorites, trash picks (not people), and have fun with this. Let's hear it, folks.
0 recs |
62 comments
Comments
Lichtensteiger
IMO, he's a better player at this point than Scott Mruczkowski was when he left BG.
I don't think there's a ton of upside...he's not going to be a hall of famer or anything, but between what I know about him as a person and what I've seen from him on the field, this is a kid who's going to be a solid player.
by thejamootz on
Mar 20, 2008 7:08 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Winner by default
by Joe P. on
Mar 20, 2008 9:16 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll say it right now
by Brian Galliford on
Mar 20, 2008 9:24 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
by jj24 on
Mar 20, 2008 9:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ha! that was a gramatical nightmare!
by jj24 on
Mar 20, 2008 9:40 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but
by Nick BensalemPA on
Mar 20, 2008 10:05 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 11:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Overdrafts are for checking accounts
by Nick BensalemPA on
Mar 20, 2008 11:22 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's fine if you like Pollack
I don't disagree that we need a new Center, I've been saying the same thing for a long time. Fowler just stinks, gets pushed around and causes the whole line to have their struggles. However, I just don't like taking a Center earlier on with the type's of players that would be available.
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 11:26 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The coaching staff
by Joe P. on
Mar 20, 2008 10:37 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not Likely
I do have the Bills taking a center (in the 6th.) I don't see the Bills taking any center in this draft with the idea of replacing Fowler in '08, maybe '09.
by sireric on
Mar 20, 2008 9:53 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sireric, HiIlary Clinton is calling
by Joe P. on
Mar 20, 2008 10:27 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
HiIlary Clinton
Alright maybe not, I was trying to be funny and I grossed myself out. You're right I should be more specific.
She must be nude, smoking hot, and under the age of 50 (hey I like MILFS).
by sireric on
Mar 20, 2008 10:37 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Center
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 11:06 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why
by Joe P. on
Mar 20, 2008 11:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't see
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 12:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Size is not the problem
by Joe P. on
Mar 20, 2008 1:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I need some info on Barnidge
by jj24 on
Mar 20, 2008 9:19 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
One of you has it right
I would still rather have Malcolm Kelly than Sweed, and I have a sneaky suspicion a CB even better than Flowers may fall to us in the 2nd round - but I love the way that jri has addressed the draft
by DC Fan on
Mar 20, 2008 9:19 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
A-gree
I am not as down on Fowler as many other's are, but I like getting O-line depth, so I have no problem with getting another center.
by RabidBuffalo on
Mar 20, 2008 1:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Analyzing the 5 rounds
Sireric: I would change the 3rd round pick out for run oriented DT to compliment Harvey. Maybe I would consider a different DB in round 2 but I could come around on Smith. I like the Bennett pick but that might be too late for him.
jri111: I'm not crazy about the 5th pick. I agree we need to address the depth on OL but I don't like a C at 5. We have backup C's for this year. Maybe a tackle would be better. I don't like Chambers that much as our depth. Veteran lineman can be had in free agency next year, too. I would slide a corner in here maybe, to round out the balance. Like with Sireric I wouldn't mind seeing a big DT t oline up with Harvey for a while. You could move Finley to the 5th and go for the best receiver in the 4th.
Kurupt: Considering you didn't know we were taking James it's hard to criticize you taking 2 corners. That's all I would change
With the players taken I see a good mix between Sireric's and Kurupts' with one alteration. It looks like this:
- Harvey
- Cason
- Run stopping DT(bryant,harrison,rubin)
- Bennett/Nelson (or Marcus Smith)
- Finley/Barnidge
With Brian and John's the mix could look like this while conversely addressing the offense and defense:
- Sweed
- TE(Davis,Bennett,Keller)
- Tyvon Branch/ Jason Jones if available
- Owen Schmitt
- WR(Marcus Smith) or corner if we have Jones
by jj24 on
Mar 20, 2008 10:33 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Bennett
How about Bennett in the 3rd and frank Okam in the 4th?
by sireric on
Mar 20, 2008 10:42 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That sounds great to me.
by jj24 on
Mar 20, 2008 10:56 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for making us all happy
I think a DT will be in my next mock for sure.
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 11:15 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Leading the pack is...
I like his draft the best so far out of the four posted on the main page. Probably the only thing I would change is drafting a WR in Round 2 instead of a CB, hoping to get one of the top guys left.
It might not be a bad idea to get 2 WR's in the top 4 picks to fill the #2 slot and give Josh Reed a run for his money in training camp.
While the need to develop a C prospect is a good idea, I think the Bills can land a decent one with a later pick (say Round 6).
by Blitz on
Mar 20, 2008 10:47 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good thought
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cason the 2nd round
There's lots of good possibilities out there for the Bills if they play their cards right.
Any ideas on who Buffalo could pick up as a decent FB college free agent?
by Blitz on
Mar 20, 2008 3:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Scout
I know nothing about what makes a great college FB translate into a good pro FB. However, being a Buckeye fan, I will say that Trevor Robinson was a solid blocker, but definitely one-dimensional. He platooned with another guy who could translate: Tyler Whaley.
by DCRumbler on
Mar 20, 2008 3:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Draft Tek Mock
Round
- CB Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, Tennessee State, 6-1, 185, 4.33
- TE Martellus Bennett, Texas A&M, 6-6, 259, 4.68
- WR Jordy Nelson, Kansas State, 6-3, 217, 4.51
- WR Paul Hubbard, Wisconsin, ?
- DE Brian Johnston, Gardner-Webb, ?
- FB Peyton Hillis, Arkansas, 6-1, 240, 4.58
7b. CB Darnell Terrell, Missouri, 6-3, 205, ?
No QB's, I noticed...
by Blitz on
Mar 20, 2008 4:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My favorite picks
Jason Jones DE, 2nd Round- Brian
Earl Bennett WR, 4th Round- sireric
Owen Schmitt FB, 4th Round - jri (any chance he falls to the 5th round? We need a FB terribly)
Antoine Cason CB, 2nd Round- Kurupt (I know him and Jones are both in the 2nd, but I would love it if we could weasel our way into getting both, trade perhaps? Jones falling to the 3rd maybe?)
by poz on
Mar 20, 2008 10:58 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thoughts on Scmitt?
I'm also weary of Schmitt because of the way he plays. He plays so dang hard that I'm just worried his career won't last too long at this level. I think we can find a FB in the 6th/7th round that could be productive. We could still go after Corey McIntyre as well.
Overall, I just feel we can spend a 4th round pick much better than on a FB.
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 11:24 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
A 4th round pick
by krytime on
Mar 20, 2008 5:07 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Trade down
Early speculation has it that Dallas might want to trade up, especially if McFadden somehow slips down to us. I've heard Philly might want to jump up too, but I will focus on Dallas since they may be both the most hungry and willing considering that they have two 1st round picks.
Suppose we trade down with Dallas and obtain the No. 22 pick overall. What else should we get? The Trade Value Chart (I know its outdated, but what do you want from me?) says we have 1250 points with the 11th. Dallas' 22nd is valued at 780. That leaves 470 points to play with. I don't know if Dallas would do it, but they could also give us their 2nd rounder (pick 61 - 292 points) and 3rd rounder (pick 94 - 132 points). Dallas actually gets the "deal" here, since they are still up 46 points by the end of this trade.
But if the trade happened, and we received that 4th rounder in the comp distribution (thanks, Gandy!), look what happends. That would give us 1 first, 2 Seconds, 2 Thirds, 2 Fourths, 1 Fifth, 1 Sixth, and 2 Sevenths. Eleven picks. How many picks are we allowed? I don't know the limit.
Regardless, we'd have 5 of the first 100 picks. Think of the flexibility! Ok, I know the what the likelihood of Dallas making a deal like that with us is, but this would surely allow all BuffaloRumblers to have their mock needs satisfied. I also have a plan for Iraq and how to stop the housing crisis if ya'll are interested.
by DCRumbler on
Mar 20, 2008 11:34 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Trade w/Dallas
I firmly believe there will be a bunch of teams willing to trade up to #11. If we can get an extra 2nd, 3rd, or even both as you mention, I would be beyond thrilled.
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 12:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, I've heard that too
Anyway, I've heard people mention that we should trade for both of Dallas' firsts, too. That is just ridiculous. I suppose McFadden were to fall to us, Jerry Jones might be so hopped up on him he might do it. But that's just too much. It ain't happening. Wake up people!
by DCRumbler on
Mar 20, 2008 12:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dallas
I've done some thinking about getting Dallas' two first round picks. It'll work if we also swap our 2nd and 3rd with them.
I've also looked at swapping with Atlanta (3 2nd round picks), Minnesota, Philly, TB, SD, and Detroit. I think there is some chance mathematically (ie-trade chart v needs) that something could get done.
I also have a scenario where they could trade completely out of the first round, and end up with 2 2nds, and 3 3rds, and maybe a little more. Would anyone argue with that kind of move?
by krytime on
Mar 20, 2008 5:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Trading out of the 1st
The only way I'd consider it is if we traded down TWICE, which won't happen. If we could trade down 10-12 spots and get another 2nd, and then turn around and trade that pick in the early 20's for an early 2nd and a 2009 1st rounder (ala Dallas' trade w/Cleveland for Quinn) and probably a 4th or so, I could deal just fine. At that point we'd have a high 2nd, our mid 2nd, a later 2nd, our 3rd and probably two 4th's, along with two 1st rounder in 2009. That could work. The only problem is we would have less of a chance at getting an impact player. I suppose under that scenario we could end up with James Hardy, Fred Davis and Jason Jones with those 2nd rounders....
IF we do make a trade, I'd have to imagine it's to move down 7-10 spots and acquire another 2nd. That would be an excellent move and set us up to get 3 very good players in the first 2 rounds...
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 5:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My whole reason
Would I take 4 picks in three rounds while keeping a first? Hell yeah. But at the point where a late first rounder blurs into an early 2nd rounder, most of these guys are relatively "equal."
I will and always will defend the argument that the way to build a team is to stay out of the top ten, and accumulate picks in rounds 2-4.
by krytime on
Mar 20, 2008 5:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re:
Agreed there. Top 100 picks are a strong way to build quality depth and talent on your team. I hope we are able to acquire some more picks in that area this year, that's for sure.
What is your scenario to get us two 2nd's and three 3rd's by the way? After thinking about it a little more, I really don't see how we can move from #11 out of the 1st completely without making multiple trades. I just don't think there is any chance that that would happen. Unless ATL offers their #34, #37 and either a 4th or a swap of their other 2nd for our 3rd, we'd have to make multiple trades.
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 6:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
rashad mendenhall
In my Dallas-trade scenario, I said that, points-wise, Dallas could give us the 22 and their 2nd and 3rd and actually come out on top. But, I don't think it will happen. However, a frenzy could start just behind us. If it does, we could wind up sitting real pretty.
by DCRumbler on
Mar 20, 2008 6:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Scenarios
Mendenhall - he might very well be the guy someone trades for. I for one, don't like the system he comes from, but he is freakishly built. Also, I heard Brohm is moving up again. If he moves up into the top ten, someone nice is obviously falling out.
by krytime on
Mar 20, 2008 6:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't forget JP
by Joe P. on
Mar 20, 2008 7:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Year to Year
I can understand why coaches think this, they need to win sooner then later to keep their jobs. But as a fan, who will definitely be around next year, I always thought that was a bit high.
I would happily stockpile high picks in 09 as part of a trade this year.
Especially if, as it seems, we will hit our peak in 2009 and 2010.
by Thronsen on
Mar 20, 2008 11:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
If I were a team like Atlanta, who has 3 2nd round picks this year, I would definitely offer one of those for a 1st rounder in 2009 (and a 4th or so this year). If you're able to parlay a pick like that into a higher pick the following year, you've definitely go to consider it.
by Kurupt on
Mar 21, 2008 12:22 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Off Subject
by sireric on
Mar 20, 2008 11:36 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes !!!!!!!!
by Joe P. on
Mar 20, 2008 11:43 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hahaha
by poz on
Mar 20, 2008 11:48 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Im in ur Billz blawg
by DCRumbler on
Mar 20, 2008 12:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wait, what cat?
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 12:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jri,
by Kumario! on
Mar 20, 2008 3:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
This is tough to workout
1-11. Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, Tennessee State
2-42. Jason Jones, DE, Eastern Michigan
3-71. Jordy Nelson, WR, Kansas State
4-110. Gary Barnidge, TE, Louisville
5-135. Owen Schmitt, FB, West Virginia
1- I feel that CB is an area where we need to be prepared to push Youbuty and Greer to either really step up this season or go back to Nickel and Dime packages. Since we run Cover 2 we can take the risk of drafting a kid and giving him a shot on the field from day 1 and I think DRC might give us the speed and ball skills we need to keep the other teams in the AFC East from passing a whole lot on us.
2- Jason Jones I think will be a great 1st year situational rusher and could become the guy who moves Kelsay back in the depth chart in 2009. Kid likes to learn and loves the gym and hits a lot of people in the backfield even if his sack numbers are a little low.
3- Jordy Nelson, and I've explained before my unreasoning man crush on him many times. I think the kid is just flat out a football player whose measurables might not be fantastic, but always shows up and succeeds, which is a huge deal for me.
4- Gary Barnidge, good pass catcher in an offense that relied on the TEs to be open and ready to take a pass coming in hot. He had a lot of touch downs because he kept getting open when they needed him too. Solid hands, and will need to be coached up for blocking and gain some size, but the same thing happened with Gates and Witten. Both are now serviceable blockers, and both are guys you don't want to let get open. I think Barnidge could become a poor man's version of both, which ain't to shabby.
5- I took Owen Schmitt here because we do need a real FB if we do not get McIntyre from the Falcons. While Scmitt may be hurt eventually, if the dude is available in the 5th, I don't think we can pass on a talent like him that can pave the way for Lynch for the next 5-6 years. Also, he is a actually a decent receiver out of the backfield which will help take some of the stress off of the TE's needing to be open each and every time that go downfield. Lastly, while I would have liked a C here, its too early in this draft for that. I think we take one in the 6th.
by WABillsfan on
Mar 20, 2008 5:28 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Your mock makes sense
I still can't envision us taking a CB in round 1, and I've said what I had to say about DRC. Right now, I don't like that pick, but that could change.
You guys are really starting to force me to like Jones (though not as much as Harvey). He sounds like he'll be a very nice DE in the league, but I'd be worried he doesn't have the pass rushing ability that this D really needs. Any thoughts on that?
Right there with ya on Jordy, of course.
I'm not that high on Barnidge. He's basically a slower, less athletic WR out there. I don't think he'll ever be an explosive player, but would be a reliable target. The team does needs that, so I wouldn't be TOO upset with him. I think the 4th may be a littler early for him though. How come everybody likes him over Jacob Tamme?
And what happened to Martin Rucker? Back in January Brian and that guy from the Mocking the Draft blog was wrongly pimping him as a potential #11 pick. Now he registers nowhere on any of our radars. I see that he hasn't done any workouts in the past few months because of a hamstring issue. Maybe he'll continue sliding down boards and end up in the 5th round range. If so, that'd be quite the value for a TE selection.
I would love to add McIntyre soon, but I think that ship has sailed. It's been a few weeks now with nothing, so I'm not sure an offer will be made. I agree that we need a FB that will help strengthen our run game, but anything before the 6th or 7th round or as an UDFA just seems a little much to me.
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 5:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Some good thoughts there
As for your take on my draft here are my replies:
CB in Round 1- I choose this spot for CB because I still believe we need better than Will James to make us a solid pass defending team. I chose this spot and DRC since I believe McKelvin and Talib will both be gone at that point. While I like Flowers, I think Jones is a better value in the 2nd as he would give us the same push anyone we could take in the 1st with the 11th would as far as depth and situational rushing. I have my doubts about DRC but I have them for ALL CB prospects in this draft. None of them strike me as a complete player right now. Currently we have guys who can tackle on the outside, but we lack ball skills there to make a play, and out of the remaining guys, I think DRC has those to make an immediate inmpact, I don't think he'll be like his cousin this season, but if he comes close, we're better off.
DE in 2- See above for my reasoning there, but in short, I think Kelsay and Schobel will be fine this season with Big M and SJ provinding some stoutness and pass rush. Since the DEs should play slightly better I think a guy like Jones who is a solid run stopper and who gets into the backfield can be coached up into a better pass rusher (I think ALL of the Bills DE's should be here every off season: Defensive Line Inc story link here). Plus he would be cheaper than Harvey, would move Denney back into the 4th spot, and that works for me.
WR in 3rd- And the Jordy love fest continues
TE in the 4th- Barnidge is one of the few guys I got to watch consistently this year, and I have no idea what Jacob Tamme can do, so thats why I went with him there. If you can get me something on Jacob, I would be happy to look into him and see what he is all about.
Rucker- I think the issue is the length of his injury downtime. Teams are really wary on people with hamstring injuries to begin with since they tend to linger a long time, and this dude hasn't done much at all in what, 3-4 months now? Not a good sign. Now, if the dude is there in say the 5th or 6th round and our trainers think they can get something for him? Then fine, take a chance, especially if we have extra picks due to a trade.
FB in the 5th- I choose Schmitt here since I don't like any of the C prospects this year enough to put one here. For me FB, C, G, and DT are the four spots we need to look into filling depth spots for our team in the last 3 rounds. I chose to take care of FB here as Schmitt has been discussed in some quarters as going as high as the 4th, and if some teams are seriously looking to get this guy, we may need to gamble in the 5th. If we sign McIntyre, then this pick goes C and then G and DT in the next two rounds for me.
by WABillsfan on
Mar 20, 2008 6:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice response
Tamme is a guy VERY similar to Barnidge, but I think he's a little more athletic. I don't know a whole lot about him though. He was one of Andre Woodson's main targets and always looked like a nice receiving TE. I'm just wondering why everyone seems to like Barnidge more than him, even though Tamme seems to be ranked a bit higher.
If we wait until the 4th-6th rounds to address TE, one of those guys or Rucker would be solid selections.
by Kurupt on
Mar 20, 2008 10:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My Choice
by Rocco58 on
Mar 20, 2008 6:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs















