Conflicting Reports on Potential Losman Trade
Earlier this week, reports surfaced that the Buffalo Bills had made the decision to keep quarterback J.P. Losman, who earlier this off-season had requested a trade out of Buffalo after losing his starting job to rookie Trent Edwards. The reports were based on COO Russ Brandon's comments at the team's annual pre-draft luncheon; it is now becoming clear that while these reports were not erroneous, they may have been misled.
Mid-to-late April is routinely a time in which NFL executives league-wide are keeping team news very close to the vest. Interviews this time of the year are generally canned responses, incredibly generic overviews of the draft process, and not-so-veiled attempts at avoiding questions. Brandon's short answer, in which he merely stated that Losman was still a part of this Bills franchise, may have been an example of these truthful-escape answers typical of this time of year.
Pro Football Weekly is now reporting that they've heard whispers that Losman is still available via trade, likely with a third or fourth round pick as the asking price, and the team would still like to move the signal-caller over draft weekend. Whether or not that happens is another question entirely, but it seems likely at this point that if the Bills get a fair offer for Losman's services, they'll honor his trade request. I don't expect that offer to come, but if it does, it wouldn't be shocking at all to see the Bills pull the trigger.
People... Russ Brandon Isn't Picking.
I've been bothered this week by reports such as this, discussing the meaning of Russ Brandon's first draft after his big promotion. Yes, Brandon's role of COO means that he'll have a much more prominent role in this year's draft process. But in Buffalo, that means very little.
The "consensus" style that the Bills' front office has employed for the last two years has been discussed so often that it's almost cliche at this point. But Brandon's opinion - again, valued more highly than in past seasons - is only one of dozens that will be sought in the team's war room next weekend. Every Bills coach will have input, and as we discussed last week, the final decisions will be made by VP of College Scouting Tom Modrak and head coach Dick Jauron.
I'm as curious to see what happens with this franchise with Brandon in charge as well. But that scope does not reach far enough into pro and college personnel matters to pin the success or failure of this team's on-field performance on Brandon. He's an orchestrator, not a decision-maker. So keep that in mind before you start to rip Brandon, as will inevitably happen over the next year. He's not as involved as local media make him seem to be, though he is involved to an extent.
0 recs |
16
comments
Comments
Losman
Who gets more value out of him then Buffalo?
by Thronsen on Apr 19, 2008 9:33 AM EDT 0 recs
"more success with number one RB"
I like him as a backup too, but don't spew this type of thing out there, which holds no water.
by killascript on
Apr 19, 2008 9:38 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Hi
I read your comments in that thread. Im pretty sure I addressed your points, aside of course from your unneccessary flames.
ML had a higher Yards per Carry with JP then with TE.
JP+ML had a better record then TE+ML.
Does it mean that JP+ML IS OMG BETTER then TE+ML at OMG 99.9% significance level. Lol no of course not. Like with many things in a season or less of football, the sample size is pretty small. But it is an interesting stat, it fits in with TE's known problems as a checkdown passer, and I think you would have alot of trouble arguing the opposite.
by Thronsen on
Apr 19, 2008 10:12 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Losman and Lynch
by The Buffalonian on
Apr 19, 2008 11:27 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Just unsure
Edwards I am fine with, but I like JP, and drank his kool-aid before last season and did have to come to the realization that he is not of starting caliber during the preseason last year, but he is a more than capable back up for the Bills.
I think he would be comfortable here for his last season if there were no offers and it may relax him since he can walk at the end of the season and start over.
by killascript on Apr 19, 2008 9:36 AM EDT 0 recs
Okay. How about an evaluation of Brandon/Modrak?
Okay, so Brandon has some input but he's not Bill Parcells when it comes to draft decisions. Notwithstanding that other sources seem to think he is now solely in charge, that's not too suprising. His experience is on the business side.
My question regards a deeper analysis of the front office. Has anybody in football done an in-depth critique of Brandon and Modrak? Modrak, at least, has been around long enough to have a track record. They've each undoubtedly tipped their hands a bit as a far as their tendencies towards how to select and handle Bills players.
How do Russ Brandon and Tom Modrak stack up so far? Still a work in progress?
by garymallow2004 on Apr 19, 2008 9:44 AM EDT 0 recs
My only concern
My only concern is who will come into play when Edwards gets hurt. Notice I said "when" not "if". Edwards hasn't played a full healthy season EVER.
by sireric on Apr 19, 2008 9:48 AM EDT 0 recs
Same concerns here...
Culpepper? Leftwhich? Rattay? Tim Hasselbeck? Yuch. Looks like we're stuck with Mr. Hamdan...
Off the subject here, but it makes you really question the NFL's decision not to have a developmental, or minor league.
by krytime on
Apr 19, 2008 10:19 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Yeah
by kaisertown on
Apr 19, 2008 12:03 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Ah, but Rob Royal isn't laughing anymore.
by garymallow2004 on Apr 19, 2008 10:06 AM EDT 0 recs
Its all about value...
I was pro-losman leading up to the 2003 draft. I was still in the same thinking up until the Jax game in 07. He is a down field passer that cannot get through is progressions fast enough to be effecient in the short passing game. But the play calling last year was so conservative it favored TE. My only beef with Losman is every great QB should be able to adapt his game to the gameplan (short conservative vs. downfield bombs). Against Jax he tried with all the dump off passes, but threw an INT when he needed to make a play. Therefore I think we need to keep him as a back up because he can play decent football, and the value we get in return leaves us very weak at QB if TE gets hurt.
by Rudy916 on Apr 19, 2008 11:11 AM EDT 0 recs
final say
by MARVelous on Apr 19, 2008 1:26 PM EDT 0 recs
re:
by MARVelous on Apr 19, 2008 1:51 PM EDT 0 recs
JP
I also agree that the ultra-conservative play calling last year did not help JP in the least.
by keuka121 on Apr 19, 2008 8:13 PM EDT 0 recs
You ready for this?
I'm not trying to start any QB controversy talk here because I'm sure first and foremost that everyone is just hoping that Edwards performs decent and we can just keep it in the back of our minds. Also, it probably makes everyone have a very bad feeling in their stomach. I just want everyone to be open to the possibility that Edwards will probably go down this season for one reason or the other because of his lousy track record and that JP is more than capable of playing well. We'll see what happens. Nothing goes according to plan (Patriots = 18-1*).
by Scotty P on Apr 21, 2008 6:35 PM EDT 0 recs
Losman's value
by moncheri on Apr 22, 2008 11:18 AM EDT 0 recs














