Dan Connor & TE
We do need LB depth, Any suggestions why Connor has fallen? I think he is a great value pick for depth and special teams, although if Buffalo took him it could spell the end for Crowell in buffalo.
The only need i see left is TE (not sure who i like that is left). Cottam is intriguing, but like most say boom or bust guy, do we have enough TE to risk a pick for a Boom here?
The rest of our draft is for depth. Outside of value at center and another WR because of expiring contracts next offseason.
Anyone have thoughts on this?
This FanPost was written by a registered user of Buffalo Rumblings. Its views do not necessarily reflect the views of Rumblings' editorial staff, but are just as valued as our own.
0 recs |
2 comments
Comments
TEs
Unless the Bills have the TEs ranked in some peculiar order it seems unlikely the team will draft one who is capable of starting. Sigh. So, why not take a guy like Connor if he’s on the board? The team could use depth at LB and get some special teams contributors to replace the guys who have been lost.
by Ron From NM on Apr 27, 2008 8:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
TE vs. Conner
I would like to see a TE in the 3rd, but if Conner is on the board I would have a very tough time pasing him over.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Apr 27, 2008 9:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

























