Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Favre to the Jets Bar-right-arrows



The Hardy Perspective: Hoosier Report's Take


Hardy should start immediately at WR (Photo Source)

Buffalo Bills wide receiver James Hardy has only been a Bill for a little over three days, and already there is an uncommon amount of pressure on his shoulders.  As a second-round pick, the ultra-productive Hardy and his 6'5" frame are being counted on to boost Buffalo's scoring potential offensively.  That's a tall task for any rookie - even if that rookie happens to be pretty tall himself.

So to get a better perspective on the rookie who is supposed to open up Buffalo's offense, I spoke to John, author of the Indiana blog Hoosier Report, who watched Hardy put up double-digit touchdown totals in each of his three years as a Hoosier.  John's first-hand perspective on Hardy serves as an invaluable resource in regards to what we can expect from Hardy in his rookie season.  Here is the interview in its entirety; my questions are in bold:

What do you make of Hardy's legal issues in 2006?  Do you believe he has put those issues behind him?
- I don't expect Hardy to be a problem.  As you know, he was arrested for domestic violence before the 2006 season.  Ultimately, those charges were dismissed as part of a pretrial diversion agreement (which is pretty unusual for a domestic situation, which makes me think the prosecution had serious concerns about the case), but he also was suspended for a couple of games early in the 2006 season, but hasn't had a problem since then.   Hardy comes from a pretty tough background, but IU's late coach Terry Hoeppner seems to have been something of a father figure to him and he has continued to meet higher standards even after Hep's death.  As we all know, even guys with pristine records can be lead astray by NFL riches, but I think Hardy has grown up.

How was Hardy utilized at Indiana - was he more of a vertical threat or did he catch more underneath passes?
- While he isn't completely one-dimensional, certainly Hardy was more of a deep threat than anything else: he averaged 14.2 yards per reception and led the Big Ten with 16 TD receptions.  But, as some of the highlight packages have shown, he certainly isn't afraid to go over the middle and because of his size, he is a great asset in red zone situations.

What one single aspect of his game impresses you the most?
- I don't know if it is an aspect of his game, so much, but his value as a college player was that the defense had to account for him on every single play, so even when he wasn't catching the ball he had a positive effect on IU's offense.

How would you grade Hardy as a run blocker?  Is he a hard-working blocker, or is he a take-the-play off guy?
- Well, this is where I could pretend to be a great x's and o's guy who watches the game on that level.  I never thought that James was any sort of a problem in that regard, although those with a better eye for the game might disagree.  He certainly took some criticism at times for games in which he didn't catch many balls (although those games were few and far between), but obviously a WR isn't always in control of such things.  Hardy came to IU predominantly as a basketball recruit, although he quite basketball to focus on football after his freshman season.  My impression is that he has worked hard to develop his game and I would expect that to continue.

Some "experts" have questioned Hardy's straight-line speed.  Did Hardy have trouble getting open in college or running away from defenders, in your opinion?
- I think that's a legitimate criticism, or at least a legitimate question.  He was plenty fast enough for college, but even the guys who get paid to analyze these things can't figure out how some guys' games will translate to the NFL.  So I'll be interested to see how Hardy plays.  On the other hand, even though NFL defenders will be faster, 6-6 is 6-6.  Hardy still will have a height advantage on nearly every defender in the league, so even if he isn't as dangerous a deep threat he should be an asset to the Bills' offense.

I'd like to thank John for the honest perspective on Hardy.  Be sure to drop by Hoosier Report from time to time to gauge his awe as Hardy tears up the league as a rookie.  For even more on Hardy, be sure to check out the Skycap's FanPost on Hardy, which includes a first-person perspective on Hardy's draft-day experience.

I want to touch quickly on one point John made:

...his value as a college player was that the defense had to account for him on every single play, so even when he wasn't catching the ball he had a positive effect on IU's offense.

This is the most important point that John made, folks.  At this point in time, Hardy's height alone will have an effect on Buffalo's offense.  Will Hardy be a world-beater as a rookie?  History says no.  But he's finally someone an opposing defense has to at least keep an eye on.  Peerless Price could not be that type of player in his second stint in Buffalo.  Hardy's mere presence will make things easier between the twenties for Buffalo's best offensive players, specifically Lee Evans and Marshawn Lynch.  When we get to the red zone, Hardy becomes an even bigger factor.

Does the kid have some growing up to do, both on and off the field?  Probably in both cases.  But this was a smart draft pick.  I wish I could see the look on Trent Edwards' face when he meets Hardy for the first time.

0 recs | Comment 21 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Thanks

Thanks alot John for the column.

by Thronsen on Apr 30, 2008 8:27 AM EDT   0 recs

Hardy difference

He is going to make the kind of impact Stroud will make on the defense. Just as you don’t forget about the 6’6 340 lb monster in the middle of a D, you can’t ignore the 6’6 4.5 speed wideout on the offense. He will have leverage, height, and will make the most difference as a rookie if he performs well.
If he doesn’t perform well I would be surprised, but in the beginning other teams will take notice, and certainly Lee Evans will reap the benefits as well as Trent Edwards.
Now it is up to Schonert to utilize the potential that our offense has, and without drafting a “top” TE, which may or may not have been necessary, I am also very intrigued by the FA pick ups at the position, and the rookie Derek Fine.

The Bills can win every game

by killascript on Apr 30, 2008 9:08 AM EDT   1 recs

great interview

by the way… why is everyone using a 6’5 measurement for Hardy?... is that his official measurement? On all the games i watched of the hoosiers they always said he was 6’7… and he looked it on the field. Plus some of us are using 6’6 or 6’4… can someone clear this up? how tall is this guy?

by osmanBAE on Apr 30, 2008 9:50 AM EDT   0 recs

He measured in at the combine at 6’ 5 3/8”

by Brian Galliford on Apr 30, 2008 10:03 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

thanks bri

when matched up against 5’10 DBs, i never doubted the 6’7 measurement… classic school media guide inflation. thanks… i’m going to use 6’5 from now on.

One think I noticed while watching games (besides how dang tall he is)... he catches balls well in traffic… and he catches all the balls that are thrown really, really hard.. and balls that are thrown hard behind him. I’m assuming this is because he has big hands, but that’s a good skill to have b/c rookie WRs have problems catching balls that are thrown hard and then end up tipping it up for grabs.

of course in the end zone they also throw the fade to him quite often (for obvious reasons)... i’m going to enjoy watching more fades in the endzone… which don’t work so well with roscoe and josh.

by osmanBAE on Apr 30, 2008 10:22 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Questions about Evans

With Hardy’s presence surely to take defensive focus off of Lee Evans I’d like to know how everyone feels about this question. If Evans fails to produce a 1,000 yard, 8 TD season this year, is that a reason to cut the losses and deem him unworthy of the large extension he will most certainly demand? If your answer is yes or no, I’d love to know why.

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on Apr 30, 2008 10:42 AM EDT   0 recs

good question

i was thinking that they are different types of weapons… i don’t think one replaces the other… so Lee’s negotiating leverage doesn’t necessarily go down if Hardy produces statistically…

but your question on Hardy taking pressure off of Lee… sure his production should got up, but not by much (though i’m not sure about this)... i found that Hardy runs alot of underneath stuff… his routes are alot like the TE… esp when going for the short yardage 1st down…there’s a CB on his back and a LB closing, but they throw it to him anyway and blocks them out. on those plays i don’t think he draws an extra safety… so should’nt change coverages for Lee… right?... actually i curious to know what Bri or Kurupt think about changes in coverage.

by osmanBAE on Apr 30, 2008 10:57 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Evans

First, I believe Evans will have a good year with the addition of Hardy. My rationale is that last year a corner was never physically outmatched by Roscoe or Reed that opposing D’s needed to double with the safety so Evans saw a lot of doubles. Hardy will force opposing safety’s to pay attention b/c of the pure physical domination he will have over them. D coordinators wouldn’t mind leaving a corner in jdeep ump ball sit with reed or roscoe but they will be forced to have a taller safety in those situations with Hardy. Remeber hardy avg over 14 yards per catch with all those short TD. He has the ability to go deep with 4.5 speed. Therefore, Evans should have space.

I believe the Bills should look to sign Evans to the same length deal as Hardy since they are physically great compliments to each other. However, if Evans has a bad season you can still franchise him and have him for two yrs w/o breaking the bank. If he has two bad season then you re-evaluate. However, I wont be as concerned about Evans #s as the offense productivity as a whole. If Evans only has 65 catches for 850 yds and 6 TDs but the coverage on him allows Hardy to get the same numbers and allow Roscoe to have 35 for 450 and 4 then overall your WR’s produced and he will be worth signing since D’s are probably still doubling him.

Also, remember a #2 draft pick is not that pricey. If Hardy is what we expect we might have a great bargain for 4 or 5 years for what WR go for. I know we have a great deal with Poz (if someone has his number please provide them) assuming he stays healthy. Expect Hardy’s salary to be close to that of Poz who was draft about 9 spots ahead. If Evans contract is the length of Hardy your #1 & #2 WR’s will not be that expensive as a whole. This would allow you to move $ around and maybe re-sign Crowell and a Top tier TE next season.

by Berg79 on Apr 30, 2008 11:08 AM EDT   0 recs

I think Roscoe

will have a breakout season as a receiver for the reasons listed above. Teams will be forced to put a CB on Hardy and if Evans responds with a better year they will still have to put double coverage on him. Meaning that Roscoe will get a LB or safety many times. His speed will be a huge advantage in those situations and he should get at least 3 or 4 long bomb type TD’s this year.

by RabidBuffalo on Apr 30, 2008 12:58 PM EDT   0 recs

On the last little bit,

I would imagine Edwards pulling a Jim Halpert eyes-wide, lips-pursed look. haha.

GO BLUE!!!

by Kumario! on Apr 30, 2008 1:38 PM EDT   0 recs

haha

best show on TV.

Jim: I don’t like talking paper in my free time…or my at-work time.
—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—
Jim: You need to let him go.
Michael: Let go of little jerk-boy before he has learned his lesson?
Jim: Yes.
Michael: You know what Jim? The world would be a better place if people were held accountable for their actions.
Jim: Yes, but not by kidnapping them.
Michael: I’m not kidnapping him. I’m keeping him until I get what I want.
Jim: As a hostage?
Michael: I think you’re over-thinking it.
Jim: I think you’re under-thinking it.
-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-
Jim: It’s a bold move to Photoshop yourself into a picture with your girlfriend and her kids on a ski-trip with their real father. But then again, Michael’s a bold guy. Is bold the right word?

by kaisertown on Apr 30, 2008 3:01 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

agreed.

best COMEDY on television. The best show is LOST. And, by the way, Scrubs is not far behind The Office. Now, back to football.

"my buffalo bills fandom is better than your buffalo bills fandom"- Thanks Nike!

by nickfeely8 on Apr 30, 2008 3:29 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Check out It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. I just started watching that a few weeks ago and it’s a lot like Seinfeld. Just very messed up and twisted.

by Scotty P on Apr 30, 2008 3:43 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Dude… Office > Lost. Sorry, Nick – I like J.J. Abrams (really liked Cloverfield), but The Office is just… well, it’s the bees’ knees.

by Brian Galliford on Apr 30, 2008 3:49 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

On a good note...

..immediately after I posted about the Office, I popped in Season One to rewatch. It has reminded me of all it’s glory. Lost and the Office are like apples and oranges, so that makes it a bit difficult to pit them against each other. Haven’t seen Cloverfield, I think it should be coming on Netflix in the next couple of days. I’ve heard good things.

"my buffalo bills fandom is better than your buffalo bills fandom"- Thanks Nike!

by nickfeely8 on Apr 30, 2008 3:53 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh, man, Cloverfield is excellent. I’m a monster/alien movie type of guy, though. You have to like the genre. If you do, this definitely won’t disappoint.

Season One, really? “Basketball” might be my favorite episode ever, but Season 2 (or 1.5, depending on how you view it) is the best. :)

by Brian Galliford on Apr 30, 2008 4:01 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Really?

Cloverfield? I was told, by multiple people, that it would be a major waste of my money. I’ll have to check it out in the next few weeks on DVD then. The whole Blair Witch camera angle is going to tick me off though!

~K

by Kurupt on Apr 30, 2008 9:43 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah… I don’t think I would buy it. It’s one of those watch it once, maybe twice, get the gist, see the special effects movies. I thought it was really cool. But I don’t know if I’d ever own it personally.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 6:40 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Blockbuster it is!

$5 is better than $20 for sure

~K

by Kurupt on May 1, 2008 10:38 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

All is in the hands of Schonert

Minus our TE situation I honestly believe we have the skill set needed to make a powerful offense. Look at the offensive weapons right now, as a rushing threat we’ve got the awsome duo of Lynch and Jackson, and our passing attack with the insane speed of Evans and Parrish, the vertical game of Hardy, and again Lynch and/or Jackson working underneath we really have the potential for a high powered offense. It all really falls on Schonert to make it all work and especially make sure Lynch has more than 18 catches. And I agree The Office is one of the greatest shows ever, I’ve always been a Seinfeld man and this is one of the only shows that I think out does it

"Where else would you rather be than right here, right now?"

by ArenZimm on Apr 30, 2008 11:09 PM EDT   0 recs

Hardy

reminds me a little of a guy who used to play for Philly 20-some years ago. Harold Carmichael – towered over the DB’s, difficult to defend against. Red zone monster.

Great complement to Lee Evans this season, if James works hard at it, which no doubt he will. Our QB’s had to be smiling ear-to-ear when Buffalo made that pick last weekend.

Get the Bills back to the big game!

by Blitz on May 2, 2008 1:15 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Daily updates on the Buffalo Bills, featuring opinions, analysis, news updates and the most intelligent community of Bills fans on the Internet.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
My four days at Bills Camp

Recent FanPosts

Russert_small
INFORMED FAVRE RUMOR
Small
Farve now a N.Y. Jet
Images_small
Its official: Favre is a Jet
Holly3_small
Why Peters should honor his contract like everyone else.
Images_small
Jets now front-runner for Favre
211_talking_proud_1_small
Looking good?
Drycanyon_small
NFL Network Bills' Preseason Schedule
Small
You made me go Brian
211_talking_proud_1_small
A couple of words from my mouth...
Joker-marmalard2_small
Somebody finally says it

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Executive Editor

Boba_small Brian Galliford

The Triumvirate

Daffy_duck_small jri111

Joker-marmalard2_small Kurupt

180px-cobra_commander_small sireric

ad

Site Meter