Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Uga VII, Requiescat in Pace: A Tribute to a Damn Good 'Dawg

Losman is Backup Plan A for Buffalo


Losman likely to leave after 2008 season (Photo Source)

I don't like opening up the volatile can of worms that is (and has been for quite some time) the quarterback situation in Buffalo very often.  For some reason, even when we're certain who the team's starting quarterback is, there's still controversy.  But today, I have to bring it up.  Why?  Well, Jerry Sullivan started it.

This past January, Buffalo Bills quarterback J.P. Losman made it known that he'd like to be traded at the team's earliest convenience.  Approximately four months later, that still has not happened.  When Losman made his trade "demand" (can a player really "demand" to be traded if they have no say in the decision?), his agent also made it clear that Losman would honor the final year of his contract - the 2008-09 season - if the Bills were unable or unwilling to deal their 2004 first-round pick.

So as it stands right now (and things could definitely change before training camp and the end of the pre-season), Losman will be a Bill in 2008, likely serving as the backup to second-year starter Trent Edwards.  That thought seems to be rather perturbing to Mr. Sullivan.  I can't figure out why, even after his latest quarterback rant.

Before I get into my issues with Sullivan's remarks, here's one good point that he makes about the situation:

It’s unfair to Edwards, who doesn’t need Losman hanging over his shoulder for a second year.

That's true - but it's not true in Buffalo's locker room.  It is plainly obvious that Trent Edwards is the starting quarterback.  Any Bills fan that pays attention is aware of that, and the Bills themselves are aware of it.  If there is any whiff of quarterback controversy next year, two things have happened - Edwards has gotten hurt and the media is firing up their favorite paper-selling tool: quarterback controversy.  If Edwards is healthy for 16 games, then he will start 16 games.  Why?  Because that's exactly what Losman himself did in 2006, and it's exactly what he would have done last season had he not gotten hurt.

Edwards will be fine.  Losman will clearly want to be on the field, but he won't get there unless #5 is injured.  Jauron has proven he can stick behind a healthy young signal-caller once in his tenure here; why on earth wouldn't it happen again?  Losman likely won't be a problem, either; Sullivan himself admits that Losman was a "good soldier" after his demotion last year.  That's about where Sullivan's good ideas end.

The big myth is that Losman could save the Bills’ playoff hopes if Edwards falters or gets hurt. But again, if Losman is such a prized asset, how come he’s still here? How come almost every other NFL team has filled its need at both starting quarterback and backup?

Sullivan explores literally every other possible explanation to Losman's still being on the roster other than it being the Bills' preference.  No one wants him.  No one would offer anything substantial in return.  Nobody has enough faith in him to warrant trading for him, even as a backup.  He even makes the claim that the Bills might not be totally set on Edwards as their starter, which is why they're keeping Losman around.

No one is insinuating that Losman can be the savior of this team should Edwards go down.  Not one single person.  But he has a better chance of doing it than any other backup quarterback currently available.  But Sullivan disagrees with that assessment, too:

For the overall good, they should get him out of here, one way or another. I don’t care who’s the backup: Daunte Culpepper, Byron Leftwich, a free-agent rookie. Anything is better than another year of Losman.

Pardon me for saying so, but that's just ridiculously biased.  We're talking about a guy (Culpepper) who has had serious knee injuries and couldn't hold onto a starting job in Oakland last year... with Josh McCown as his main challenger.  And I hardly need to remind Falcons fans of Leftwich's inability to hold off Chris Redman in Atlanta last year.  But yeah, let's sign them right up if it means Sullivan's wishes come true.  These are terrible quarterbacks, folks.  Losman isn't a gem himself, but he knows this team, he knows the system, and he's ready for one more year in Buffalo.

The fact of the matter is that no matter what Lee Evans believes, Losman is a backup.  That's not going to change.  If Edwards gets hurt (deities forbid) and Losman performs even adequately, that's a good thing for the Bills - whether or not Evans starts campaigning for a Losman promotion again or not.  Ultimately, this argument rests squarely on the shoulders of one Dick Jauron.  Stick by your starter, coach, and media attempts to create controversy like Mr. Sullivan did today will be for naught.

There.  I'm done talking quarterbacks for a while.  Local media should try the same tactic.

Poll
Do you believe that having J.P. Losman on the 2008 roster will be a problem for the Bills?
Yes
85 votes
No
305 votes

390 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 97 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

the picture

let just say that the picture you selected for this article is literally how I will always remember JP in my mind when I think of his time with the Bills.

That aside, I’m a big Trent Edwards fan, I won’t apologize for it, and as soon as he came close to resembling a starter I was ready for anyone that wasn’t JP as well. But, I will reluctantly say this, sometimes I wonder how things could have been different if JP was given a chance to play with the kinds of weapons that Trent will next year. Trent will have Freddie, Marshawn, Lee, and Hardy. Now, am I saying that JP could do a better job than Trent, no. I believe Trent is a smarter QB and has what you look for in a long term QB, patience and poise (i’m not going to get into an argument with people who say his checking down every play and dumping is not poise or patience because it certainly is for a rookie who could have just been slinging interceptions and incompletes instead). I’m simply saying that maybe if JP had played with talent his value to other teams would have been perceived to be much higher. The kid definitely had his opportunities to prove himself many many times and he has no excuses but that doesn’t mean he didn’t get a train of bad breaks either.

It doesn’t really matter to me if JP is around or not in the locker room. The team is undergoing a youth movement and has already moved into the next era that doesn’t include JP. This is not the same team that he was the leader of. Whether or not he stays or goes, the team has already gotten on a new train and he didn’t have a ticket. Mentality wise, JP is already gone so it won’t affect the team one bit if he’s there physically.

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 1, 2008 2:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with your assessment, poz, and let me just say: I do NOT want this to turn into a JP vs. Trent thread worthy only of message boards. Let’s leave Edwards mostly out of this if we can, because we KNOW he is the starter.

This is about Losman as the team’s backup in 2008, and that’s it. I don’t see how that is a bad thing, ESPECIALLY considering the alternatives. I also don’t see Losman being a problem in the locker room. I view Sullivan’s article as an attempt to spark the QB controversy all over again, and for me (and hopefully for a lot of Bills fans), it isn’t working.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely

the one thing about Edwards that is worth mentioning is that he has been a starter for 5 years (4 at Stanford and 1 in Buffalo) and he has only made it through ONE season without missing games due to injury. I would say that there is a great chance that Losman sees time next season. Last year 73 different quartbacks attempted at least 10 passes. 51 QBs attempted over 100 passes.

by kaisertown on May 1, 2008 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But

on the other hand you did take the bait and write about it!

Bills Fan in PA

by BILLS on May 1, 2008 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mentality wise he’ll be preparing as if he’s the starter. Losman believes that he is starting QB material in this league and this year will be his last chance to show teams that. He’s going to make the most of his opportunity this year to do just that because Edwards isn’t the healthiest and will probably go down at some point this season. Also, he’s only a second year QB that’s only started half a season. He’s bound to struggle and Jauron might pull him depending on how the season is going. Who knows, we might even blow out some teams and Losman could see some garbage time. The fact of the matter is he’s our best option as a number two.

by Scotty P on May 1, 2008 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is exactly what this team or Edwards don’t need right now. It is a young team trying to gain an identity. Edwards need a mentor. Someone to help him grow at the position. Not someone trying to chop him down in order to fulfill his ego. This image of Edwards having a noodle arm and being fragile is one drawn up by the Losman supporters. Let it go and Losman too.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I definitely understand what you’re saying but the fact is that there aren’t any guys like that available right now in free agency. Culpepper and Leftwich to name a few still think that they can start in this league too and would view the situation similar to how Losman probably does. I’m not partial to Losman or Edwards. I just want to see the Bills have a winning season and get to the playoffs. What if Edwards stinks it up out of the gate and we get blown out the first three weeks? Would you really want to sit there the rest of the season watching Edwards struggle the rest of the season when you know the Bills are on the cusp of the playoffs on paper with the talent we’ve added this offseason? I hope Edwards does well so we don’t ever have to revisit this ever again, but this is definitely a possibility we all have to realize. We only scored offensive touchdowns in half the games he started last year.

by Scotty P on May 1, 2008 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really good stuff Brian
(can a player really “demand” to be traded if they have no say in the decision?)

Sure, a player can demand a trade like a child can demand that mom buys them a candy bar everytime they go to the supermarket or a toy everytime they go to the mall. The only leverage those kids have is that they are less work when they are happy, and when they throw a fit it embarrases the mother. A player under contract (especially if the player is in the last year of the contract) has a similiar amount of leverage. They can threaten to not play or whine and pout and become just a hassle in general.

JP Losman has done nothing at all to lead me to believe that he will be a problem. JP has tried his hardest to be a good player and teammate since the moment the Bills took him. It’s too bad it never worked out.

I’m really surprised that Sullivan didn’t mention that Losman’s trade value is substantially lower than it would be if he had more than one season left on his contract. If JP had 3 years left at a reasonable price, a team probably would have been willing to give up a high 3rd round pick for him. But what is the point of trading for a QB in the last year of his contract? It is a double edged sword, if he can’t earn playing time for whatever reason (doesn’t pick up the system quick enough or gain chemistry with WRs quick enough, the team decides to go with the younger QB with more “potential” or decides to stick with the vet who “knows how to win games”) then he leaves after the season without giving you anything in return. If he earns playing time and perfroms poorly, he leaves and all the fans wonder what the team was thinking. If he earns playing time and does well, then you have to let him walk, angering fans, or give him some big contract that all QBs seem to get. Guys like Billy Volek (3 years 9 mil), Todd Collins (3 years 9 mil), Josh McCown (2 years 6.5 mil), Cleo Lemon (3 years 8.9 mil), Chris Redman (2 years 5 mil) and even Trent Green (3 years 8.9 mil) are getting WAY overpaid. Imagine what some team would have to give Losman if he came in for an injured starter and led a team to a .500 record. If a team traded for Losman and he completed almost 60% of his passes and threw more TDs than INTs a team would be stuck giving him a stupid contract like 4 years 14 mil or something similarly ridiculous.

by kaisertown on May 1, 2008 3:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

JP Losman has done nothing at all to lead me to believe that he will be a problem. JP has tried his hardest to be a good player and teammate since the moment the Bills took him.

Are you kidding me? He was such a good teammate, that he tried to divide the locker room. Did you ever see this good teammate on the sideline during games trying to give Trent some advice. No! He was always shown sitting on the end of the bench holding a football waiting for the coaching staff to call his number. Then at the end of the season a statement came from his lawyer asking to be traded. If Losman is your definition of a good teammate, I’d love to hear what you think of Ocho Cinco.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I actually saw him talking to Edwards and Steve Fairchild quite frequently at home games. He wasn’t a problem. If you saw him at the end of the bench, you probably saw him because whoever was covering the game on TV was talking about him being benched and wanted to frame it nicely.

Losman may not have been a good teammate in your eyes, but he wasn’t a BAD one either. In no way did he “try” to divide the locker room – we’re only led to believe that because of a few comments Evans made that were blasted in the media. Divided locker rooms don’t play their hearts out week in and week out. Divided locker rooms don’t start 1-4 and rebound to nearly make the playoffs. It just doesn’t happen. There was no division last year, as Sullivan and others would lead you to believe.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Brian, it wasn’t just Evans, Whitner chided in as well until he realized that maybe the coaches were right . When Evans made his comments, Losman could have doused the fire by simply saying that the coaches made their decision based on my play, I have to live with it for now, I will get better. Instead, he got in front of the media saying that Evans was a good friend of his and Evans had his own opinions. Simply put he could have asked Lee not to say anything about the situation and let his play dictate the solution. Let’s not forget “the owner is making the decisions on this team” crap. Maybe he wasn’t trying to be devisive, but there wasn’t much solidarity on his part either.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can agree with that. But Sullivan’s argument is that Losman is a locker room cancer because he’ll want to start this year. Culpepper and Leftwich would come to Buffalo with the same idea in their head. It doesn’t make sense to me, then, why he’d prefer those guys over Losman.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know. Maybe because they did have some success in the league.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

True, but not recently. Losman is younger than both. Healthier than both. More mobile than both. A better option than both. We are talking about a backup here… ideally, they’d never see the field.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

in JPs defense

He had finally gotten his chance to prove himself and it all got taken away in a heartbeat. He never said Lee was right he just said that he had his own opinions and that was because JP knew that he had earned the chance to compete last season. Sure it didn’t work out that way, and I love Trent, but I think JP did pretty good under the circumstances.

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 1, 2008 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which circumstances are you referring to? Not having enough playmakers/weapons? Plain and simple, he couldn’t read defenses!! He didn’t how to take what the defense was giving him.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again… the point of this thread was NOT to bash Losman or Edwards. It’s about Losman as a backup. If you want to make the argument that you’d prefer Culpepper or Leftwich a la Sullivan, that’s perfectly acceptable.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t want either of those 2. Poz had the perfect scenario in my opinion, Brunell, but what about a David Carr or Kerry Collins. Simply because they would assume a backup role.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not sure what the situation with Collins is, but thankfully, David Carr signed with the Giants. I can’t believe he’d be a consideration… that guy is awful.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

?
Which circumstances are you referring to?

I think he was refering to the circumstances surrounding his demotion after he returned from injury. Right Poz?

it just feels like it is impossible to talk quarterbacks without people bashing Losman for a variety of things.

by kaisertown on May 1, 2008 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats it kaiser

exactly what i was referring to. And I stand by that, considering the circumstances of his demotion, he handled it better than many other athletes would have. Thanks for clarifying kaiser.

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 1, 2008 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah that's what I thought

I saw him talking to Trent and the coaches from time to time. The only times they showed JP on TV was probably when the offense was out on the field. Why else would they be talking about JP?

What did JP ever do to try and divide the locker room? I thought all his soundbites after the demotion and after Evans’ comments were VERY tame.

Comparing Losman to Chad Johnson is laughable. Both players asked for a trade, but have nothing else in common. Look at the way both players went about asking for a trade. Losman had his agent call the Bills. The Bills and Losman both said it happened, but neither side had much to say about it. Johnson went on a series of national shows, both televised and on the radio and said that the Bengals coaches didn’t like him. He said on the Jim Rome show that the only players on the entire team who “had his back” were Carson Palmer and TJ Houshmandzadeh. Johnson has said repeatedly that the team has treated him badly and that he will sit out this season. JP hasn’t said anything bad about the Bills as an organization or about any of the players. He has said repeatedly that he is going to honor his contract and play out the season.

by kaisertown on May 1, 2008 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s because JP and his agent know that they have not a leg to stand on while 85 and Rosenhaus know that Dallas, Washington, Raiders, etc will swoop him up in a NY minute. If JP had a career like Favre and was in a contract dispute, then you would see the fangs.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well given the situation that he’s actually in, based on that logic, why would Losman be a problem this season?

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In response to Kaisertown

I have to go mow the lawn now. Great debate though. I’ll respond to comments later.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So?

how do you know that and why is it at all relative to what we are talking about?

And what fangs, Losman knows he is going to have to start his career over again somewhere. He is going to leave Buffalo and sign somewhere else where he will have to learn a new playbook and meet new teamates and beat out different QBs for playing time. I think Losman just wants that to happen sooner rather than later. This isn’t a contract dispute.

JP wasn’t a problem last season and won’t be a problem this year. If he was going to cause trouble, he would be doing it already.

by kaisertown on May 1, 2008 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

‘Then at the end of the season a statement came from his lawyer asking to be traded. If Losman is your definition of a good teammate, I’d love to hear what you think of Ocho Cinco.’

Losman actually stopped speaking to the press entireiy for the last few weeks of the season, just to avoid this sort of thing. His trade request, no where did he ever say ‘demand’, came 3 weeks AFTER the season was over.

by Thronsen on May 1, 2008 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sully's on the money

This team needs a Frank Reich. Someone who knows their role and loved it. Reich knew that he had a snowballs chance in hell to be the starter in Buffalo, but came and practiced like he was. Reich was the QB of the greatest comeback in NFL history, but knew that when Kelly was healthy he was going back to the bench. He didn’t pout or cry that he should be given the opportunity to unseat the incumbent, he knew his role. He didn’t sit at the end of the bench during games. He looked for things the opposing teams defenses were doing so that he can give Kelly a heads up in case Jim wasn’t aware. Edwards need this type of player/coach to help him excel in the league. Is it Culpepper or Leftwich? I don’t know, but I do know that it isn’t Losman.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 3:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, having a Reich would be nice. But do you know how incredibly rare a player like Frank Reich is? I can only think of a few backup quarterbacks in the league who are “happy” or “comfortable” with their situation – Aaron Rodgers (last year behind Favre, anyways), Jim Sorgi, Matt Cassel. They back up the greats. Kelly was a great. No quarterback is going to come here to back up Edwards unless they’re ancient – they’re coming here maybe to help, but definitely to play, as it would appear likely (to them) that Edwards gives them a good shot at playing time.

How is Sully on the money? Losman will be out of town this time next year at the latest, and Edwards will be fine in the meantime provided he stays healthy. So we trade a quarterback, replace him with the choice rotten banana from the garbage heap, and we still hope to hell that Edwards doesn’t go down. Nothing changes, except we lose a little experience with our offensive system. That’s a negative. Losman needs to be here unless some team gets desperate enough to reach in a trade for him. It’s as simple as that.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's no Frank Reich

And I know he’s old but he’s been successful, can be a heck a mentor, and would be serviceable in a pinch. That man is…...Mark Brunell. eh….anyone?

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 1, 2008 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he would've been perfect

But he signed with the Saints. It’s a better situation for him though. Great starting QB on a decent team in a average division. They have a quarterback friendly coach and good weapons to work with. Warm weather too.

by kaisertown on May 1, 2008 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

too bad

thanks for the info kaiser. Some how I have to wonder how the Bills didn’t get involved in the aging QBs that have been signed. Trent Green was expensive i know but David Carr was around I believe and some others. Strange they didn’t at least, publicly, try.

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 1, 2008 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yikes

I don’t want David Carr anywhere near Buffalo unless he’s starting for the other team. Did you see him play at all last year?

by Scotty P on May 1, 2008 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha

David Carr had 73 completions out of 136 attempts (53.7%). He threw 3 TDs and 5 INTs. In 5 starts Carr threw for 579 yards (115.8 per game) and averaged 4.7 yards per attempt.

by kaisertown on May 1, 2008 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Carr

and those numbers don’t even tell half the story with him last year. What a bum

~K

by Kurupt on May 1, 2008 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i know

last year was awful for him but lets not forget those years when he looked a lot like JP down in Texas. he showed promise then, who knows what happened last year, its not like the Panthers have an option not named steve smith

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 1, 2008 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know, if you’re looking for someone with experience, someone that can be a mentor, and knows the system, but won’t actually need to take the field, I’ve got the perfect person: Alex Van Pelt.

Oh, wait…

by Krenn on May 1, 2008 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t remember David Garrard or Matt Schaub whining about playing time. Were Byron Leftwich and Mike Vick greats? Kurt Warner right now is a better QB than Matt Leinart, but he will constantly tell you that he is the backup period. I would like a veteran QB on the team that knows how to read a NFL defense as opposed to one that knows the”system” What good is knowing the “system” if you can’t read the defense in front of you.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will give you your Losman arguments. I can’t argue them.

As for Garrard and Schaub, no, they didn’t complain, but they were different situations. Leftwich and Vick were Top Ten picks. And I don’t remember Losman “whining” about playing time either. Clearly, he felt like he’d been robbed of it, but he never said “I should be on the field” or anything resembling that. Losman isn’t a problem…

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Charlie Batch

Charlie Batch in Pittsburgh is the only other guy I would term a true “Backup’s Backup” He has been in the league long enough to know he will never start, but is always ready to help his team out. He has seen everything, been through everything and isn’t fazed by it. He also can play well enough in spurts to keep at .500 or better if their starter goes down.

Sadly, the Bills couldn’t offer enough to Pittsburgh to pry him away as he is the only guy out there I would like to see backup Trent other than JP. I like JP as backup for 2 reasons. 1- He is already here, and with the team, and knows everything they want to do on offense, no learning curve. 2- The guy has taken the “good soldier” route to this situation, came right out and said he would honor the contract if he couldn’t be traded. He didn’t demand as much as request one anyhow. As it stands, when he hits FA next year, any team getting him knows that as long as the situation is spelled out to him, he will do his job within the confines of his contract and the agreed upon situation. Not a bad thing for him, or the Bills this season.

Now, where does this leave us? Well, unless the Bills believe Luke Drone is better than Hamdan, we will keep JP until end of year when he becomes a FA, and we check the market again of second tier talent there. Also, there will be some decent college QBs coming out next draft that could be capable backups, especially if Trent plays all 16 games and does OK-Well on the field. Then the team will go with a Rook, and either Drone or Hamdan.

Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....

by WABillsfan on May 1, 2008 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reich

1st Kelly was on the team before Reich as the “established QB”. Reich was a great back up and knew his role was backing up Kelly. But when Reichs contract was up, He left for the jets and then carolina to get a starting gig.
That situation is not even close to the losman vs. trent.

Would you rather win one superbowl or Lose four in a row? Which defines your teams place in history more ... 1yr wonder or Perennially 2nd best?

by Rudy916 on May 1, 2008 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good grief, Sully

Losman may not be setting the NFL on fire, but he’s not as bad as you’re making him out to be. He’s actually a pretty good backup QB compared to other backup QB’s around the league. Don’t sell him short just because he didn’t work out here as a starter (apart from 2006). I still love the deep ball he throws, even though I don’t like other parts of his game.

The history of the NFL shows a lot of QB’s less talented than J.P. – give the guy the benefit of the doubt as a backup QB, I’m going to.

Get the Bills back to the big game!

by Blitz on May 1, 2008 4:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Losman is a goof sport

And frankly, I still think he can be a good player in this league. Lets just all see what happens during the preseason and then leave it at that. I think Edwards is good, and I think JP has struggled to get his game on track. Why is just speculation, but as Brian said, JP will be the back up barring injury, and unless he comes in early in the year and brings us to the playoffs, he’ll be gone.

Beat the Pats

by De-fense on May 1, 2008 6:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

A few thoughts/observations

There is nothing like the mere mention of “JP” to get the joint roiling. By and large I agree that JP as backup is a good thing for this year. All of the reasons have been mentioned astutely by others-i won’t repeat them. I do know that JP still feels somehow that he was “wronged’ and is still hacked off. I am also reasonably sure that intellectually (if not viscerally) he knows that his best chance for redemption in 2009-is to practice and study hard—something he has always done, and if/when TE goes down, to be ready to step in. I do know that the coaching staff feels he is by far their best alternative for this year. I think he will be a good trooper.

Only one thing concerns me-and it is that I really feel that TE needs a veteran mentor. I do not have a name in mind-but it was not clear to me at all last year that he had a “go-to” guy when things got rough. Particularly being thrust into the starting role so early. Much of this I lay at the feet of Fairchild and a hurt/frustrated/angry JP. The people at OBD would say that the combination of Turk and Van Pelt have been acting in this role since the season ended and weight training started. I trust them—but I do wonder.

Geronimo

by Geronimo on May 1, 2008 7:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Thank You Geronimo

I’m glad that I wasn’t the only one who noticed a hurt/frustrated/angry JP and that trying to mentor Trent was the furthest thing from his mind. He just wanted his job back.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good post, G. As far as a mentor goes, I really think that Alex Van Pelt’s influence on Trent will be felt. I feel much more strongly about AVP as our quarterbacks coach than I did about Turk…

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Losman/Edwards: Embrace the QB questions, Brian

I’m not a Losman fan-really. I think he has a lot of talent, is team player, and real good guy and everything, but all excuses aside (and JP has some valid ones in his star-crossed career), what I want most out of a QB in terms of attributes is points. JP Losman-led teams failed to consistently put up points and by the Jacksonville game last year, I was ready to turn the page on Losman (and still am). On the other hand, here’s what I like about Trent Edwards: he’s 24. Other than his youth, I have never been more annoyed by QB play in Buffalo than what I watched out of Trent Edwards last season. He led the team to touchdowns in only 4 games out of 9 as a starter. He was lauded for his game management skills, yet the 4th quarter interceptions he threw against Dallas and Baltimore were beyond stupid- almost Aaron Brooks-esque- making the ambiguous “management” praise he received just as pointless as the Ralph Wilson Stadium scoreboard in the home team column under Dick Jauron. In short, Trent Edwards had a horrible season. Can he get better? Yes; he’s only 24. But Buffalo should not have handed Edwards the most important job on the team before training camp based on his 4-games-with-Tds-out-of-9 performance last season. Jauron should have brought in a QB to compete with Edwards for the starting job in 2008. Can that QB be Losman? Not at all. The Bills organization has benched Losman four times already in his career. Turning back to Losman at this point makes no sense at all- for all itensive purposes, the Bills have told Losman he’s not good enough to play in the NFL and right or wrong, it’s asking too much for a player to respond positively to the type of grading that the Bills issued Losman on his report card four times- even for a game or two. Here’s why this issue is important and why Brian shouldn’t tred around eggshells whenever the QB position is brought up: Buffalo is set up to have a winning record and make the playoffs next season aside from the 2007 version of Trent Edwards running the offense in 2008. If Edwards takes a leap next season towards top 16 or so NFL QBs, I fully expect the Bills to finish 9-7 or above next season. So why potentially throw that away by gambling on Trent Edwards? If Edwards was made to compete for his job, and he did indeed, make the leap he needs to be effective, he’d win the job anyway. If he’s still the scrub that we saw in 2007, Jauron would have another option so that 2008 is not a wasted opportunity just for the sake of Trent Edwards and his ambiguous potential that may or may not be anything more than a desperate franchise’s imagination. What this team needed was competition for Trent Edwards and that’s exactly what JP Losman isn’t at this juncture of his career in Buffalo. For that reason alone, JP Losman makes for a terrible option as the Bills second option at QB in 2008.

Never forget 56-10. Revenge.

by SuperFan82 on May 1, 2008 8:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who is “competition” for Edwards then, 82? The rookie we didn’t draft? Daunte Culpepper? Competition wasn’t happening, and that is a GOOD thing for Edwards. FOR ONCE, a young quarterback in Buffalo needs a flipping vote of confidence. Edwards needs to know that he’s the starter through thick and thin.

In my opinion, competition works at every position BUT quarterback. QB is your most important position, bar none. Having an open competition there creates controversy, skews leadership, and sustains controversy throughout the season no matter who wins the starting job. Competition needs to be completely obliterated at QB, even if it means handing the job – WITH a vote of confidence – to Edwards.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good for Edwards, bad for the Bills

Competition only creates controversy if Edwards isn’t good enough to rise to the occasion. If Edwards is as good as some Bills believe, he’d win out over a more proven commodity in training camp…if he’s not good enough, what were you worried about protecting? Don’t let the QB position hold a competitive team hostage…in any case, Jauron played this hand wrong, which is no surprise. That being said, turning back gto Losman at any point (due to injury or ineptitude) doesn’t make sense after benching him four times since early-2005. Rather than looking at Culpepper and Leftwich, I’d monitor Tampa Bay for a better option (w/ West Coast offense experience- something Losman wouldn’t excel at anyway given his issues with short rhythmic passing). After drafting Johnson, Tampa now has Garcia, McCown, Gradowski, Johnson, Simms, and Griese off the top of my head. I figure they’ll keep Garcia/McCown/Johnson I like all of these other potential options better than Losman for the Bills in ‘08.

Never forget 56-10. Revenge.

by SuperFan82 on May 1, 2008 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please check my FanPost, I list ALL backup QBs currently in the league

And all current available FA QBs there as well. I also look into what it may take to pry a guy away from the team holding him. I will update as people get cut or added to rosters.

Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....

by WABillsfan on May 1, 2008 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cool

I was looking for a list like that. Thanks.

Never forget 56-10. Revenge.

by SuperFan82 on May 1, 2008 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This line of thinking is what hurt JP Losman’s development Brian. Because Losman was given the starting over Bledsoe instead of letting him compete and learn from a Pro Bowler his growth as a QB in the league was stunned. The competition starts in camp and preseason with the best man winning the job. After that you put all your confidence into that player. I’ll refer to another example with the CB position last year. Jabari Greer was far the better CB than Youboty and Webster yet the two aforementioned got the starts because of ones draft position and the other’s familiarity with the coach. A persons ability to acheive through their work ethic is much more respected by their peers than a person who is handed something that they didn’t earn.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think handing the job to Losman was what ruined his development – I’d pin that on his being yanked in and out of the lineup. That can’t happen with Edwards.

Strong point about the corners. Greer should have won that job outright. But again, CB is not nearly as important as QB… QB is the one spot you absolutely have to have stability. Competition-created controversy is the antithesis of that.

by Brian Galliford on May 1, 2008 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly
Competition-created controversy is the antithesis of that.

Competition can be a good thing, but what if nobody wins. Do the benefits of a training camp competition outweigh the possiblity of there being no clear winner? The worst possible thing that could happen with the QB situation is a controversy and competition often leads to controversy.

by kaisertown on May 2, 2008 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know controversies are a big deal in the Media, and now on boards. But does Fowler (or whomever) really play less hard?

I have been on sports teams where the coach made decisions I disagreed with. But damn if I didnt work as hard, I wanted to win much more then I cared about the coach.

by Thronsen on May 2, 2008 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you blame a child for getting hit by a car when you put them in the middle of the street? That is what Fairchild done with Edwards in the Baltimore/Dallas games. He probably saw disaster coming but was forced to run the play because he wasn’t allowed to audible. Those pass plays should have never been called that deep in their own zone with a young QB. Our defense was playing soundly. Simply running and punting the ball away and we could have won those games.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Child

Maybe the negligent adult in your analogy is Jauron. Why would you go into a season with a #2 QB who wasn’t ready to play full throttle? Having a veteran backup to Losman last season probably would have won us the Dallas game.

Never forget 56-10. Revenge.

by SuperFan82 on May 1, 2008 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about not putting your rookie QB in that situation!! Roethlisberger was able to excel because his coaches didn’t put him in those positions.

by the Skycap on May 1, 2008 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Roethlisberger won 15 games that year...

...I’m pretty sure he’d have done ok with a situation where he was handed 2 defensive TDs and kickoff retun td in front of the most memorable and awesome home crowds in recent NFL history…Edwards played with training wheels on last year. That was effective once or twice, but overall his production proves he wasn’t ready to play. His fault? No. Fairchild? Getting warmer. Jauron? Now we’re talking.

Never forget 56-10. Revenge.

by SuperFan82 on May 1, 2008 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bad analogy

Attempting to compare Ben R’s situation with that which TE had last year, is totally apples and oranges…is unfair and you guys actually know better. One is prepared and practices as a starter, and plays as a youngster with a veteran, playoff-tested offense—a set of fine recievers, and a solid, refined offense. One is thrust into a starting role with few reps, the second youngest team in the league, one wideout and an O-Line in its first full year together. Guess which one is which?

If you are suggesting that TE should have been the 3rd QB last year and not played at all—tell me how that would have been benficial to him or the team at all.

Geronimo

by Geronimo on May 1, 2008 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure

It would have been beneficial because the team woud have scored TDs in more than 4 of the 9 games that Edwards ended up starting. Buffalo’s offense was so historically unproductive in a large part because Edwards wasn’t ready to play in the NFL Unfortunately, his production proves it. Edwards may someday soon be ready to lead an offense effectively in the NFL. Maybe it will be by Week 1 in 2008, but he sure wasn’t ready to play last year. I say, be ready in the event that Edwards doesn’t improve because it would be a real shame if an up and coming roster sacrificed another whole season just to spare a QB and coach some second guessing.

Never forget 56-10. Revenge.

by SuperFan82 on May 1, 2008 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Those pass plays should have never been called..."

Edwards is better than Losman, right? If Edwards is better than Losman, fine. Then there shouldn’t be any excuses. If he’s better, then let the kid play. Fans can’t have it both ways.

by Fort Worth on May 1, 2008 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sullivan

Jerry Sullivan would write a column spinning his own birth as a bad decision.
Negative pot-stirer at best. Not worth a thimble of ink.

by LeClaireBill on May 1, 2008 8:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Negative pot stirrer

kinda sums it up nicely, IMO.

Get the Bills back to the big game!

by Blitz on May 2, 2008 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Team vPlayer

Surely, losman will want to put in 100% this next season if he wants another job next season. It would be in his best interest. I would rather have Losman as back up rather than the current crop, and hopefuly they can trade for another QB in the offseason.

by aussie34 on May 1, 2008 10:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not sure how this can turn into anything other then a JP vs TE thread, with people continually bashing JP. Virtually every stat JP had last year was better then TEs. If JP is terrible, what does that say about TE?

And as others have mentioned, JP has done nothing other then be a good soldier. His request (show where he ever used ‘demand’) for a trade came 3 weeks AFTER the season was over. He purposely had stopped giving interviews for weeks before the end of the season just to avoid all the nonsense.

I also dont believe there is a single QB out there who is better then JP who would be willing to come in and not fight for the starting job. At least with JP its pretty obvious what his role is.

Last year, JP came in off the bench and scored 10 points in 1 quarter against a Jets D that had held TE to 3 points over 3 quarters. He then went on to win every game he played where Lynch was also playing. It wasnt until Lynch went down and JP and the now unemployed A Train faced the NE Juggernaut that the wheels really came off the wagon.

by Thronsen on May 1, 2008 10:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Backup QB

From 2003 through 2007, 2006 was the most productive season by any Bills quarterback. Then why such a short leash in 2007?

by Fort Worth on May 1, 2008 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah I wouldnt mind having that discussion as well. But was trying to keep my comments in the frame Brian set up at the start.

It gets tough though when I see comments about how bad JP is, but there are many arguments that could be made that he was better then TE in 07 (let alone 06).

by Thronsen on May 1, 2008 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Frame

Quarterback is the most important position on a football team. The best teams have the best quarterbacks. In the end, we all want the Bills to be the best. Therefore, as long as it is intelligent and respectful, I think quarterback discussion should be encouraged.

by Fort Worth on May 1, 2008 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

im out

this thread really did turn into JP vs TE. Im gonna say one last thing: I see repeatedly that fans keep saying these conversations turn into “bashing JP”. How are they not “bashing TE” threads as well? Stop feeling sorry for JP, he may not deserve to be bashed but he’s finished. Instead we should look to the future and be talking about the TE potential which is vast. Jeesh guys, the kid is a rookie and he keeps getting his stats compared to a veteran of the system like JP. The quesion isn’t if JP is so bad and his stats are better what does it say about Trent. The question should be what does it say that JP is so underdeveloped he can even BE compared to Trent. If JP had been anything but a bust then this conversation couldn’t happen. The fact that it does says volumes about JP and TE, but not in JPs favor. Be excited about TE potential rather than throwing out the stats of a kid who played his first year with one of the hardest schedules in the league, twice against the undefeated Pats, and with injuries all over the place. This conversation is worthless because TE is the QB, we’re close to the playoffs, and we should start thinking that if we’re going there Trent will take us and stop being so darn negative. He was a THIRD rounder!! That means he wasn’t supposed to be NFL ready out of the gate, he’ll get better!

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 2, 2008 12:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

By ‘JP bashing’ I mean I see alot of inaccurate and non-factual things written about JP, far more then I ever see about TE. And the comments in this column are no exception.

Lets take what you wrote for example:

’ Be excited about TE potential rather than throwing out the stats of a kid who played his first year with one of the hardest schedules in the league, twice against the undefeated Pats, and with injuries all over the place. ‘

For a start TE didnt play two games against New England. Heck he didnt even play one if youre a fan of the ‘TE has a winning record’ stat.

It depends a bit on how you count the shared NE and NYJ games. But here are the opponents records that each QB faced (dropping the shared games from both):

JP 2006 – Opponents record .574 (toughest in the NFL)
JP 2007 – .542
TE 2006 – .469

You simply cant state that TE played a tough schedule, when his opponents collectively did not have a winning record.

As far as him being a rookie, sure he could get better and his progress should certainly be monitored. But the league is full or QBs who didnt play well their first year and continued to play badly. There is no guarantee written in stone that he has some huge improvement in his 2nd year.

I suspect youll find the probability of a QB who played well for an entire season returning to that form is higher then a rookie who played badly starting to play well.

by Thronsen on May 2, 2008 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bleh sorry typo.

Should read:

JP 2006 – Opponents record .574 (toughest in the NFL)
JP 2007 – .542
TE 2007 – .469

by Thronsen on May 2, 2008 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ugh. I give up. Last quarterback thread ever. I give you guys props for treating each other respectfully, at the very least. This DID turn into JP vs TE, but it didn’t have the message board feel. I’m proud. But no more quarterback threads until something changes. :)

by Brian Galliford on May 2, 2008 6:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

QB threads

Of course I totally respect your opinion to have no QB threads.

But I do think its something that at least some people are interested in, especially when there is so much inaccurate information out there (TE played NE twice?).

I appreciate the coaches have made their decision, and thats fine. Heck, I hope both QBs come out like Peyton Manning if for no other reason so we can Rob (Johnson) another team for draft picks. The evidence at BB.com aside, it is possible to have interesting fact based discussion about the decision.

2 starters at important posistion lost their job after the Jax game, JP and Atrain, something that never seems to be chatted about at all.

by Thronsen on May 2, 2008 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Regarding your last comment – Anthony Thomas didn’t lose his job after the Jacksonville game because he played poorly. If you recall, he was actually quite good in that game, scoring a touchdown on a screen pass from Losman. Thomas was injured and placed on IR after that game. He’d still be on this roster if Fred Jackson hadn’t performed so admirably.

by Brian Galliford on May 2, 2008 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Brian...

I just despise the “Inaccurate information” that’s thrown around this site.

by the Skycap on May 2, 2008 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hehe

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 2, 2008 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

why dont shared games count?

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 2, 2008 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It doesnt change the result. Adding both games to both QBs changes both stats in the same direction.

by Thronsen on May 2, 2008 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and...

sorry also wanted to include that sure they each played the Pats once, I don’t think its fair to say the first game was shared, but how did JP play any better than Trent. Trent threw for about 100 yds if I remember and a pick and JP threw for 150 yds and 1 TD and 1 pick. Thats not that much better for a seasoned player compared to a rookie.

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 2, 2008 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Im not particulary bothered by your retraction about how each played the Pats only once (although actually JP played them twice, and no one who says Trent has a winning record admits he played the Pats).

Im much more bothered by the fact that TE played a weak schedule. You said he played ‘one of the toughest schedules in league’.

It bothers me that even after you are proved totally wrong, you dont admit it, and try to cloud the issue.

That is JP bashing. I have never seen disregard of the facts about TE like I do about JP.

by Thronsen on May 2, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

excuse me?

How am I in any way proven totally wrong or covering the facts? Wow, so my memory served me wrong about one Pats game same as yours did about a certain Jaguars game.

First, Trent absolutely played one of the toughest schedules. Let’s see, he played the Cowboys, a good Ravens defense, the playoff bound Redskins, the 10-6 Browns, the Super Bowl Champion Giants, and the Eagles. Those are all very tough games and make for an extremely difficult rookie schedule.

So essential you’re problem which was initially the Pats comment, which I clearly admitted as an error, you over-expanded into non-nonsensical attacks such as clouding an issue when I’m apparently proven totally wrong which I don’t think I have been. If you had read any of my previous posts you would have recognized that not once was I JP bashing, only defending TE.

Listen pal, if you want to degenerate this into a disrespectful back and forth, then go right ahead, just don’t expect me not to fire right back.

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 2, 2008 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Higher road, gentlemen. Note to self: no more quarterback threads… :)

by Brian Galliford on May 2, 2008 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wasnt trying to disrespect you. My apologies.

But Trent did not play a hard schedule.

He did not play teams with a winning schedule.

JP did.

Seriously.

This is my entire point, please check the stats.

I was a TE supporter also. Someone told me JP was more accurate, and I laughed at him.

Dont make the same mistake.

by Thronsen on May 2, 2008 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough

Apology accepted and same right back.

I accept your point but here was mine.

If Edwards is indeed going to be our starting QB for the foreseeable future it almost seems redundant to keep comparing him to JP who by all accounts is on the way out.

No hard feelings about this joust here pal, if anything it was a good vent session.

Another 3 rounds of starters in the draft?

by poz on May 2, 2008 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well

If you were to count the first Pats game as an Edwards game (which I would considering JP barely played) it would bump the win percentage of Edwards’ opponents up to 52.7%.

Losman played against:
Denver – 7-9
Pittsburg – 9-7
Cinci – 7-9
Miami – 1-15
New England – 16-0
Jacksonville – 11-5

Edwards played against:
New England – 16-0
NYJ – 4-12
Dallas – 13-3
Baltimore – 5-11
Washington – 9-7
Miami – 1-15
Cleveland – 10-6
NYG – 10-6
Philly – 8-8

“He did not play teams with a winning schedule.”

Well you are right that JP faced a tougher schedule, I think that statement is a little extreme. J.P. played 3 three teams above and 3 teams below .500. Edwards played 5 teams above, 3 teams below and 1 team at .500. I wouldn’t call Trent’s opponents easy. Not the toughest schedule out there either.

I also think winning percentage can be deceiving in determining who played the tougher teams. Despite Champ Bailey, Denver was one of the worst pass defenses in the league and JP played awful. JP played better against the Steelers (still pretty bad) and got ripped in Buffalo, but then Pittsburg went on to have the best pass defense is the entire league allowing only 5.7 yards per pass attempt. Teams like Washington (only 6.0 yards per pass attempt) are also deceptive.

by kaisertown on May 2, 2008 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Need to do the Math

Trent did not play teams with a winning record.

And he certainly did not play a tougher schedule then JP in either 2007 or 2006.

JP also played tougher defenses if you want to go that route. Seriously, do the math.

by Thronsen on May 3, 2008 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HUH?

Sorry, but what specifically did you disagree with from my post? I wasn’t disagreeing with you. I was just elaborating. JP played a tougher schedule, but I think it is a little closer than you believe.

“Trent did not play teams with a winning record.”
Trent played 5 teams with a winning record. NE, Dallas, Washington, Cleveland and the NYG.

“And he certainly did not play a tougher schedule then JP in either 2007 or 2006.”
I never said he did.

I used the same numbers as you and came up with the same results. The only thing I did differently was count the Pats game for Trent. Losman barely played and Trent attempted 20 passes.

if you add up the record of all the opponents’ records that Trent played (including NE), you get 76 wins and 68 losses. That rounds up to a 52.8% win percentage. If you add the second Jets game to Edwards’ opponents the win percentage comes down to .500

Here are the opponents by pass defense.

Losman played against:
Denver – allowed 7.2 yards per pass attempt
Pittsburg – 5.7
Cinci – 7.1
Miami – 7.8
New England – 6.4
Jacksonville – 6.7

that rounds out to 6.82 yards per pass attempt

Edwards played against:
New England – 6.4
NYJ – 7.2
Dallas – 6.4
Baltimore – 7.6
Washington – 6.0
Miami – 7.8
Cleveland – 6.7
NYG – 7.0
Philly – 6.9

That rounds up to 6.89 yards allowed per pass attempt. If you count the second Jets game for Trent it would bump that total up to 6.92 yards allowed per pass attempt.

by kaisertown on May 3, 2008 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Avoidance of the QB questions?

I respect your opinion, Brian and generally enjoy your blog, but it’s really unfortunate to see how you’re so adverse to discussing Trent Edwards’ poor play last season. It’s out of my enjoyment of and respect for your blog that I will bury my thoughts here rather than in a diary so as not to interrupt the discussion of your article today (which was a good read). You and your community here did a throrough job all offseason of discussing just about the entire Bills roster in an intelligent manner and I was entertained and occasionally educated all offseason, even when I didn’t agree with you and your readers. That being said, I have to express my bewilderment with how Trent Edwards’ play has been looked at critically around these parts of the internet. It’s kind of backwards to debate the merits of Teyo Johnson, Melvin Fowler, and Ryan Denney all offseason, yet the most important player on the team seems to be above detatched, critical analysis. I can’t help but play amateur psychologist here and guess that it’s out of some fear of an epiphany about what we truly witnessed last season in Trent Edwards. All built in excuses aside, his individual play was the second worst of any Bills QB who started at least half the team’s games since the ‘85 Ferragamo/Mathison debacle (the worst being Losman in ‘05). Even some of the most obvious notorious examples of ineptitde by recent Bills’ QBs- Johnson ‘01, Van Pelt ‘01, and Todd Collins ‘97- played better individually than Edwards did last season. At the very least, Edwards’ association with that group warrents some apprehension. I realize that Edwards was a rookie last season and agree that established starting caliber QBs shouldn’t be yanked in and out of starting lineup like you would a right guard. But whole seasons should never be sacrificed only for the sake of “developing” a QB. QBs shouldn’t play until they’re good enough to be held accountable for their play. Some QBs are ready for that as rookies, some need to sit on the bench for two or three seasons. Judging by the treatment around here of Trent Edwards, he hasn’t reached that point yet. If Edwards is indeed, the unrivaled starting QB of an NFL team, as Dick Jauron has deemed him, it’s time to take the kids gloves off. Trent Edwards played poorly last season and thus, the only evidence that he’ll be ready next year is a litany of ambiguous cliches about “management” and “poise” and a yearning to “bill-lieve” (whatever that is). You can’t discuss the 2008 Bills without looking critically at 2007 Trent Edwards. It may be an unsettling thought, but it’s a necessary evil to admit that the current roster, while a nice mix of youthful promise and catalogged veteran production at most positions, has nothing other than a whole bunch of flimsy, hopes and dreams attached to the QB cupboard. Based on Edwards’s actual, tangible production, I don’t believe you can call the QB problem in Buffalo is a moot point.

Never forget 56-10. Revenge.

by SuperFan82 on May 2, 2008 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey man… I respect your opinion right back. It’s refreshing to see a guy with an opposing viewpoint to a lot of people’s here make his case without calling everybody an idiot for seeing things differently or being “wrong”. There is room for more than one thought process, and there’s room within that to make points civilly. You do that well.

It’s kind of backwards to debate the merits of Teyo Johnson, Melvin Fowler, and Ryan Denney all offseason, yet the most important player on the team seems to be above detatched, critical analysis.

I don’t consider thaht backwards at all – Johnson, Fowler and Denney all have multiple complete seasons at the NFL level, while Edwards was yanked in and out of the lineup as a rookie, when he probably shouldn’t have been playing in the first place. To be completely and utterly honest, I thought it was a bad move by the club last season to cut Craig Nall before the regular season and make Edwards the primary backup. But we’re in the situation we’re in.

I give Edwards a lot of credit – he should have been crapping his pants last year, but even though his statistical production was poor, he held his own. Yes, he needs to improve by leaps and bounds this year, and the coaching staff and fan base will be asking a lot of him. I think he’s capable. That’s enough reason for me to delay criticism at this point, because he’s still never entered a season for us as our sure-fire starter. If he struggles, we fail to make the playoffs, and our offense is putrid, you bet I’ll be right at the forefront of the Edwards criticisms next off-season. I just hope he gets that full season as the unquestioned starter to make his case, for better or worse.

by Brian Galliford on May 2, 2008 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey Superfan-

I disagree with alot of what you have said on this board, but I think you make a great post here.

Brian runs the best board about the Bills. ANYWHERE. Seriously, what an awesome site. But I disagree with the TE free pass.

by Thronsen on May 2, 2008 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, c'mon, Brian,

ya gotta admit that a free-for-all like this once in a while is fun. The secret is not to take these opinions too seriously. We’re just venting our frustrations with this team over the past 7+ seasons, really.

I like TE, he’s got a good head on his shoulders. I just wish there was a way to put J.P.’s throwing arm and legs on him. Then we’d have one heck of a QB…

Get the Bills back to the big game!

by Blitz on May 2, 2008 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My mistake then, thought the IR placing came later.

My personal view is that in general A Train played terribly in those games.

JP was the leading rusher against NE. A Train combined for 77 yards in the 2 games he started with JP. Combined for 77. It was a bad game for Lynch when he couldnt do that in a single game.

All the posts about TE in bad weather? At least bad weather affects both sides. A Train was a disaster for JP only.

QB threads are interesting. Not sure why they are persona non grata.

by Thronsen on May 2, 2008 9:18 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I posted this in another thread but

In my opinion there are 3 backup situation worth watching to add guys as the #3 or in case the coaching staff realizes JP is a problem (which I dont expect to happen).

In no particular order of preference
#1. Atl: They have Ryan, Harrington, Shockley, Redman: 1 of the last 3 will prob be cut and even Shockley would make a solid #3. Id take Harrington or Redman in case of emergency (I know Redman is expected to start but who knows).

2. MN: They will keep Jackson and Booty so either Ferrotte or Bollinger will be cut. Both make solid 3’s and could be a 2. 3. TB: Either Simms, Griese or Gradkowski will be cut as they have Garcia. Any of them make a solid 3 and emergency plan for a bad losman situation.

by Berg79 on May 2, 2008 9:44 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What is up with Gruden and all those QB’s on the roster.

by the Skycap on May 2, 2008 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Best Future Coach...
Billsjaguars_small
On Mike Shanahan and Gary Kubiak
Hamstergolfhd4_small
3 Things We Need to Know: Weeks 5-10
Dib_small
Bills fans, I'm coming for you...
Bills_small
Release of Hamdan
Picture_2_small
Two possible father/son combos
Images_small
The Remaining Games
Sst1_small
Jacksonville weekend
Bills_small
Strong Kudos to Ralph Wilson
Bills_small
Reflecting On the Edwards Era

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mobile Live
Eagles shuffle linebackers again
Mobile Live
The VRR: Redskins (3-6) @ Cowboys (6-3)
Mobile Live
Antonio Pierce out indefinitely

Editor-in-Chief

Ronswanson_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Billsjaguars_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Nfl-toronto_small kaisertown