Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Bills OT Peters Reportedly Seeks New Contract


Peters seeks to strike gold after Pro Bowl season (Photo Source)

After not-so-inconspicuously missing the first three days of the Buffalo Bills' first 2008 OTAs, the Buffalo News is reporting that Bills offensive tackle Jason Peters - elected to his first Pro Bowl in 2007 - is seeking a new deal from the Bills.  Peters now joins a growing contingent of young Bills players looking for big paydays - a list that already includes WR Lee Evans and LB Angelo Crowell.

Our very own sireric correctly predicted this would happen back in February, so be sure to check out his clairvoyant writings before proceeding here.  Peters - scheduled to make $2.2 million in 2008 as part of a 5-year, $15 million extension he signed in 2006 - is a classic NFL rags-to-riches story: the former undrafted free agent tight end made a position switch (twice) in Buffalo and has worked his way into becoming one of the NFL's elite young offensive line talents.  At age 26, Peters is just now entering the prime of his career and should serve as the anchor of Buffalo's offensive line for the next decade - if, of course, the Bills honor his wish for a new deal.

What kind of a deal may Peters be looking for?  Let's crunch the contract numbers, considering both the "elite" names at Peters' left tackle position, as well as the salaries of some of the more recent high-profile left tackle signings.

In 2004, Baltimore's Jonathan Ogden broke the bank with a deal that still looks big despite the rapidly escalating salary cap, and was monumental in '04 - 7 years, $50 million with $20 million guaranteed (most of which were paid to Ogden in the '04 and '05 seasons).  That deal served as the benchmark for three deals signed by offensive tackles in 2005 - and if you're a fan of the NFL, you've heard the names:

Walter Jones (SEA): 7 years, $52.5 million, $15 million signing bonus
Orlando Pace (STL): 7 years, $52.9 million, $15 million signing bonus
Chris Samuels (WAS): 7 years, $46 million, $15.75 million signing bonus

Ogden, Jones, Pace and Samuels have been the elite names at the left tackle position for a number of years now, but they're not the best-paid players at their position.  Believe it or not (and it's not that hard to believe), that distinction belongs to three players that have a combined two years of NFL experience between them.  Those players, and their contracts, are:

Joe Thomas (CLE): 5 years, $42.5 million, $23 million guaranteed
Levi Brown (ARI): 6 years, $62 million, $18.1 million guaranteed
Jake Long (MIA): 5 years, $57.5 million, $30 million guaranteed

Surely Peters - a self-made Pro Bowl player with more than two years of starting experience - deserves a better contract than those three guys.  Right?  You can bet that's the argument that Peters' agent is planning on making.

One thing is clear: if there's one Buffalo Bill who deserves to be considered among the NFL's elite at his position - and paid accordingly - it's Jason Peters.  He's already there.  Lee Evans may eventually get there, but he's certainly not there yet.  Peters is a top-notch performer, a great success story, and has proven to be both durable and a team player during his short, excellent career with the Bills.  Pay the man, Buffalo.  Keep him happy - this guy has "franchise cornerstone" written all over him.

As a final point - and I'm leaving it up to y'all to expand on this in the comments section - there has not been any indication (yet) that Peters is holding out or plans to hold out.  These are voluntary OTAs, and Peters has skipped them to make his point.  Only time will tell whether or not Peters is serious about getting this new deal done ASAP - if he skips training camp, the Bills have problems.  Sign the man.

Poll
Do you believe Peters will hold out if he doesn't get a new deal before training camp?
Yes - as the third-highest paid lineman on the Bills, he has negotiating power
125 votes
No - Peters is a high-character guy making his wish known so he can get a bigger deal after the season
163 votes

288 votes | Poll has closed

1 recs  |  Comment 47 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

AHHHHHH

I was hoping this wasn’t the reason. Unfortunately, we’re going to have to exceed that deal Dockery got.

If the numbers you listed here Brian don’t prove the point, then I don’t know what does, but those rookie salaries are abso-friggin-lutely ridiculous. There is no reason for Jake Long to be getting the same guaranteed money that Pace and Jones have gotten COMBINED. How it’s going to suck to be a Fin fan when that guy turns into a bust.

There’s also no reason that Peters shouldn’t be aiming to get a contract that those guys have “earned”. I’d be surprised if he isn’t seeking at least $10M per season (on average) with $25+M guaranteed.

Will we be seeing the ramifications of those insanely stupid contracts we handed out last offseason (Schobel, Dockery, Kelsay)?? Are we going to be able to afford giving Peters and Evans somewhere in the ballpark of $100M combined, with about $50M guaranteed?? Peters is certainly worth it and it can be debated ad nauseum whether Evans is, but to me, those deals from last year are going to handcuff us with all future deals. Not only will money begin to be limited, but deals like Dockery’s and Schobel’s are going to be where the agents will want to start for Evans and Peters.

I think Peters will hold out and probably rightfully so. Yes, he signed that deal 2 years ago and it was fair at the time, but coming off a Pro Bowl season and due to the position he plays, the deal is outdated unfortunately. I was skeptical of that before, but I’m convinced that Peters will no doubt get a new contract this offseason or will hold out. There’s no reason a slightly above average player like Dockery should be making so much more than a franchise cornerstone. I have a feeling this could get messy if the FO doesn’t work swiftly to appease Peters (also without offending Evans).

Toronto, we need ya. Keep pumping money into this franchise if it means we can definitely sign the Peters and Evans of the team…..

~K

by Kurupt on May 21, 2008 11:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

There’s also no reason that Peters shouldn’t be aiming to get a contract that those guys have "earned". I’d be surprised if he isn’t seeking at least $10M per season (on average) with $25+M guaranteed.

I’d place it less than that, K – we need to get him past $7 million per season (Dockery’s deal) and $18 million guaranteed (Dockery’s deal), while placing him AMONG the top linemen signed. Faneca got $8 million per season; I’d think Peters could be had for the same, or maybe a hair more, and $20 million guaranteed.

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 7:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Jason gets a new contract after this season

I think the Bills will make a deal with Jason and his agent to resign him to a nice big fat contract this upcoming spring. I think Jason held out these three (non-finable) days to prove his point that being the third best paid when your the best player is kinda dumb. But the flip side is that he signed that extension KNOWING what he was getting into at a time when he was NOT a pro-bowl player.

I think the Bills will ask him to wait to the spring so they can use what money they have left NOW to pay off Lee Evans and Crowell and make sure those contracts impact THIS seasons salary cap. They will then look at what players to cut next spring, and what the new cap will be and will then renegotiate Peter’s contract then when they will have more money on hand than right now when they have two guys to resign on the team who will be free next year, and not a guy still under contract for another 3 seasons.

As for what he gets? If he plays like Orlando or Walter in their primes, award him a deal like that. If he regresses slightly, pay him market rate for it. But I still feel the Bills will wait on this till next spring.

Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....

by WABillsfan on May 22, 2008 2:31 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t necessarily disagree with you, WA, but my guess is that if nothing happens before camp, Peters will hold out as long as he can through training camp. I DON’T think he’ll sit out any games or anything, but he’ll only report to training camp when he has to. He does have some leverage here.

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sounds good

but how do you get Peters to agree to that without holding out? He’ll be on the Bills asking them what would happen if he got hurt and why they feel those other guys are more important than a franchise LT…

~K

by Kurupt on May 22, 2008 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Peters has shown a willingness to be a company man

Quite a few times, this is his first recorded (as far as I know) “fight” with the FO. He may be willing to make a handshake deal with Mondrak and DJ. The Bills have shown themselves to be fair (and cheap) but fair with their players. Besides, he might agree if it means he gets paid more like on of the rookies instead of one of the old timers.

Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....

by WABillsfan on May 22, 2008 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

other extensions

I think the Bills sign both Peters and Evans. But this is a business and that means somebody ISN’T going to get paid and that someone is Crowell. I think he might be the odd man out.

The Giants just tore up David Deihls contract even though there was 3 years left on it, so this doesn’t shock me at all.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on May 22, 2008 6:48 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I’ve been saying Crowell wouldn’t be re-signed for quite some time now – I think this is his last year as a Bill, and if Peters gets a new deal ahead of him, it confirms it. That’s fine by me – if we get Peters and Evans locked up long-term at Crowell’s expense, that’s what’s best for the team right now.

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 7:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

it’s easier to find capable linebackers, then it is to find stud left tackles.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on May 22, 2008 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only that, but they’ve already got a potential replacement for Crowell on the strong side in Kawika Mitchell. It’s easier to find good weak side linebackers in the draft these days, so if we re-sign Peters and Evans, let Crowell walk, move Mitchell to the other side and draft a starting-caliber linebacker with speed to man the weak side, we’d be all set – and more than likely, better talent-wise.

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hopefully they will all be long gone by the time the Bills pick, but any of the big three in the draft this year (the 2 from USC and Laranitis (sp?)) would be great.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on May 22, 2008 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

See? It’s rather perfect. TE, LB and C seem to be their big needs heading into next year. Lock up WR and OT while you still can, before those positions are added to the list.

We should run this team. :)

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

Instead of collecting money to help Nick, we should take up a collection to buy the Bills, then the team will be Rumblings owned!

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on May 22, 2008 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry Nick

You might be on your own buddy.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on May 22, 2008 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Come on

You know DE is going to be a big time need next year too.

I hope Ace Bowen has potential to be starter for us. It’d be nice to find a late round starter at the position.

I’d hate to have to use another high pick on a LB.

~K

by Kurupt on May 22, 2008 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I left DE out just for you, K. :)

I’m waiting to see what we have in Ellis before making that judgment. If he’s ineffective as a situational pass rusher this year, then yes, by all means, see if you can find a left end early in the draft next season.

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget Denney

He gives nothing pass rush wise, I would be fine cutting him lose. If that were to happen, then another DE would be in order.

I might have to change my screen name to superfan92 and use a picture of Denney as my avatar.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on May 22, 2008 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even if Ellis has a good rookie year

DE is still a MAJOR need.

Schobel is up there in age and we all know how bad Kelsay and Denney are. I could see the last two being potential cuts next year if Ellis steps up and we have other options. At least Denney is very replaceable…

~K

by Kurupt on May 22, 2008 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you forgot

DE. I think DE is still a top priority unless somehow Ellis turns out to be a stud

MARVelous

by MARVelous on May 22, 2008 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Drafting a WLB

I would rather re-sign Peters, Evans, AND Crowell and use the draft pick to select a starting-caliber player at another position.

by Fort Worth on May 22, 2008 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don’t think that’s unrealistic? Especially considering Geronimo’s report that the Bills coaching staff likes, but isn’t enamored with, Crowell?

I’ll take 2 out of 3 first. Heck, I’ll take 1 out of 3 first – let’s just get these signings going.

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re-signing Peters, Evans, and Crowell

Unrealistic or not, I just want the Bills to be competitive. Make that elite. Keep up with or surpass teams like the Dallas Cowboys.

I’ve been without internet for a little while, so I havn’t visited this site much recently. Will you please provide a link to Geronimo’s report?

Why wouldn’t you want to keep a player that you like and still has room to improve and become enamored? Maybe I’m ignorant, but I don’t see many holes in Crowell’s game. If Crowell was old and in decline, I could understand letting him walk.

by Fort Worth on May 22, 2008 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Enamored

If the coaching staff isn’t enamored with Crowell, I can’t imagine what they think of players like the hand-picked Donte Whitner. Crowell has been a better playmaker than Whitner in the same defense with the same supporting cast.

by Fort Worth on May 22, 2008 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not Fair

Other teams like the Cowboys can obtain and retain any player that they want with seemingly zero financial limitations. Somehow, the Cowboys can afford to pay Tony Romo, Terrell Owens, Leonard Davis, Flozell Adams, Jason Witten, Roy Williams, AND Marion Barber AND Terrence Newman! I’m sure they’ll find a way to pay DeMarcus Ware without any problems.

Meanwhile, teams like the Bills must comprimise their good players. Makes me sick. With the possbility of an uncapped year on the horizon, how will the Bills be able to compete?

After a players signs a “long-term” contract, everyone should refrain from saying that the player will be with his team for years to come. Bull. Every contract is becoming a one-year contract. Every time one player gets paid, every other player becomes “underpaid” and wants a new deal. Ridiculous.

by Fort Worth on May 22, 2008 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your last point is true to an extent, but I don’t think it applies to this Peters situation. Yes, he should honor his contract – and I think he will, at least for another year – but he is vastly underpaid for a Pro Bowl player. He deserves a raise, and he should get it. The big question seems to be “when” at this point.

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Contracts

Whenever Peters or any player gets a new deal, he’s going to want another new deal the following year.

by Fort Worth on May 22, 2008 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think that’s true, either, Fort – why haven’t guys like Walter Jones, Orlando Pace and Chris Samuels held out for new deals after the new guys (J. Thomas, L. Brown, J. Long) got better deals without ever stepping on the field? Why did Randy Moss settle for a 3-year deal in New England when Bernard Berrian got double that in Minnesota? Those are just a few examples.

Players aren’t as greedy as you’re making them out to be. Greedy, yes, but not to that extent. And Peters, as I said before, has a legitimate beef.

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do not pay him this season

He signed a deal based on potential. He has 3 years left of a 5 year deal. At the time he signed the deal it was a phenominal deal for a undrafted player with little experince. He has exceeded expectations however the Bills crumbling to a player (Even an all pro tackle) demands are not good when negotiating with others. I think the Bills should play complete hard ball and refuse to even discuss contract with Peters, however they should give him the promise that they will discuss things next offseason if he comes to camp. I dont like this move at all. I dont blame him for doing it, however I hope his agent is advising him he needs to set things up for a negotiation next year.

by Berg79 on May 22, 2008 9:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not true....

If the Bills brass thinks Peters is the real deal then give him a new contract. The sooner you extend a player like this the less money it is going to cost you in the long-run. I’m actually surprised Peters isn’t waiting until next year to ask for a new deal, he’d probably get 15-20% more money if he has another Pro Bowl season.

I’ve said this before but I have a feeling this maybe Walker’s last season as a Bill. I’d like to see the Bills extend Butler and move him to RT.

by Harris on May 22, 2008 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey

I just wanted to say you got a great site here man and I have always enjoyed reading your site and never really commented on anything but now is as good a time as any to join up…keep up the good fight…I live in the south and it’s hard to get any Buf news down here so it’s nice to see a well written updated blog every once in a while

by Lion Alum on May 22, 2008 9:56 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Glad you like it. :)

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How Bad Do We Really Need Him At OTA's?

I am by no means happy that Peter’s is sitting out these OTA’s but I think we should step back and see how far he is willing to take this before we just jump into a new huge deal. Getting guys like Chambers, Murphy and Bell more experience will allow us to see what we have in terms of backups and could be very beneficial, not to mention we already know what Peters brings to the table (a lot). If he is prepared to sit out through training camp (which is debatable) then maybe it is time to talk serious negotiations, but if he is just looking to make a little noise then maybe we can wait till next offseason before we give him the bank.

It’s also important to note that the whatever action we take will provide a template for future players who are unhappy with their contract. If we just run into contract negotiations with Peter’s b/c he skipped a couple OTA’s, players will think that skipping team functions is the best way to make their point. I think that is a bad trend to start and only leads to more problems.

by jkleeb83 on May 22, 2008 10:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Crowell

Based on the discussion above it seems that many consider Angelo Crowell the most dispensable of the three starters with contract issues this year and next. While I can’t really argue with that point and I do agree with it, for the sake of fairness, there has to be a defense of Crowell, this is America after all.

First, With our defense finally coming together now we should do everything we can to keep Crowell, who may be less replaceable through the draft than some would like to think. As it now stands, let us not forget that Crowell is the ONLY member of our linebacking core who has ever proven anything as a Buffalo Bill. Posluszny is essentially a rookie and Kawika Mitchell probably wouldn’t have been as hyped of a free agent if he hadn’t played on the Super Bowl champs. While I believe both are excellent players, as evidenced by the name I use on this site, Crowell is consistent and stays on the field, and has gotten better every year. I remember waiting for Crowell to get the recognition he deserved and to get on the field more when we had our nasty linebackers a few years back. We developed this guy and he’s making our investment worth it, do we really want to see him go? Bowen, we know nothing about yet, so he can’t even enter the discussion and there are plenty of rookie linebackers who aren’t ready to play until a few seasons or who are busts. We got a good guy with Poz, not ALL linebackers in the first two rounds are not busts as some seem to believe.

Second, what leaders do we really have on defense? I hate that Chris Kelsay is a locker room leader, i’m sorry but I want my locker room leader to also be a leader on the field. Except for Schobel there is no other player on the defense who performs like a leader and has been a long time member of the team other than Crowell. McGee is not good enough to be that kind of leader and everybody else is too young, too inexperienced or a free agent (I’m leaving Kelsay and Denney out of this discussion). Crowell is an example on and off the field and I don’t feel comfortable with the kind of message letting him walk would send to young up and comers and like Donte, Poz, and McCargo if they see that happen. Who knows, maybe they’ll start thinking about walking when they hit their primes as well as to them it will appear that the team doesn’t value hard work and production.

There is no doubt that Jason Peters is irreplaceable, there is no doubt that Lee Evans is our best offensive weapon, but there can be no denying Crowell’s value to this team. There are some developing prospects at WR, Johnson, Hardy come to mind, we don’t have anyone ready in the next two years to fill in for Angelo. If it means cutting some players or pushing back Peters until next year, we have to resign Crowell, let’s not all start talking about how it won’t be that bad if he leaves next year. It would be very detrimental and a big step backwards. Just because he’s number 3 on the list of re-signings doesn’t mean he’s disposable. We have three pressing contracts disputes, three not two.

McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year

by poz on May 22, 2008 12:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Leadership

You are correct, poz. Regarding leadership, performance on the field comes first and foremost. If you perform first, then you can talk because you will have established credibility. You can’t lead by talking if you don’t perform.

Someone please remind me: why are the Bills paying Chris Kelsay so much money? Kelsay should restructure his contract to help the team re-sign Peters, Evans, AND Crowell. Then, maybe next offseason can be focused acquiring the best TE, DE, and C rather than acquiring adequate TE, DE, C, and LB.

by Fort Worth on May 22, 2008 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We can’t remind you if we’re just as flabbergasted about it. :)

A Kelsay restructure would be a good way for him to remain in the team’s good graces after he puts up 4 more sacks in ‘08. It’d lock him in for a roster spot in ‘09, at the very least…

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

4 sacks?

Shooting a little high now aren’t ya? He has 15 career sacks, what makes anyone think he’ll give us anything more than the little he provided last year?

~K

by Kurupt on May 22, 2008 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well

Those 15 career sacks came during the last four seasons. So his career average is about 4. That’s pretty sad. I actually thought he was going to improve upon his 2006 season and become an above average player last season. I guess not.

by kaisertown on May 22, 2008 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

penalty?

what kind of penalty would the Bills incur for cutting a contract the size of Kelsay’s? Just out of curiosity would like to know what releasing him would mean economically.

McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year

by poz on May 22, 2008 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

His contract

included an $8M signing bonus and an initial roster bonus of $3M. The amortization of the signing bonus would seemingly be all that would apply to a cap hit, so I guess it’d be a $4M cap hit if cut after this season???

~K

by Kurupt on May 22, 2008 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

WORD!

I really like Crowell, and the fact that he mentored under Spikes, Fletcher, and Posey…. He has gotten better every year and I want him to stay a Bill!

It's hard for me not to sing the shout song all day long.

by Lance in Germany on May 22, 2008 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Peters Salary

He signed a contract that at the time was a contract that he liked. The Bills should not be pressured to re-doing his contract. He signed it—he should be man enough to live up to the contract until it ends.

Bob

by copman on May 22, 2008 12:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Close, Bob – he should be man enough to live up to the contract this year. He’s getting his wish out there now so that, at an absolute bare minimum, he gets a deal after the ‘08 season (but ideally before). He’s entering the third year of that five-year deal; there’s nothing wrong with the Bills restructuring with two years left after this season. But to expect him to play the next three years on his current deal is unrealistic.

by Brian Galliford on May 22, 2008 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How much of a bonus did he get 2 years ago?

I don’t remember but someone on here well may remember the signing bonus he received. Divide that by 2 and add it to his salaries for this season and last. What do those numbers look like? They might not be up their with some of the top paid LTs but they may not be as bad as some people make them out to be.

With that said, the Bills can’t afford to lose Peters. If he sits out the team will see a significant drop in talent at LT. The running game will suffer likely moreso than the passing game. Buffalo will have to accommodate Peters, even if it means losing either Evans or Crowell.

Copman, I’m with you in spirit. However, until the league guarantees all contracts it’s not a tenable position in reality. Teams cut guys all of the time and thereby screw them out of millions. It’s hard to argue that players shouldn’t buck the system as well.

by Ron From NM on May 22, 2008 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Save $$$

Wouldn’t extending Peters now actually save the Bills a lot of money in the long run??? If he plays at a Pro Bowl level again next year he’d probably be able to get 15-20% more.

If the Bills brass is convinced he’s the read deal…. I see nothing wrong with extending him. I don’t think it sets a terrible example either because Peters was a TE/RT when he signed his last contract, not a Pro Bowl Left Tackle.

by Harris on May 22, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He wont sit out

He wont sit out b/c he can’t go anywhere for 3 years, maybe 4 if we franchise him. The The NFL is a tough business and while he might want a new contract the reality is if he wants to play in the NFL he has to be there week 1. He very well might miss training camp and pull a Bruce Smith. Personally, that doesn’t matter much to me as our backups can use the work. If he wants to collect a 3.3 million dollar pay check he will be there when the games are on the line. I also dont think the Bills would save money by signing him now as oppose to next year. If we sign him this year a fair # might be 6 years 60 million then he makes 60 million over the next 6 yrs or 10 per year. If he performs well and we sign him to a 5 for 60 next year then he makes 63.3 million over those same 6 years or 10.6 per/yr. This doesn’t mention the injury risk.

by Berg79 on May 22, 2008 2:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Peters Salary

Billszone reports Peters salary as 3.25 mil this season with a Cap value of 4.45 mil. His amoritized bonus of $1mil should be his prorated bonus money when he signed the deal.

USA today’s salary database projects Peters salary as:
Base Salary Sign Bonus Other Bonus Total Salary Cap Value
$ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 150,000 $ 4,550,000 $ 2,600,000

Would you rather win one superbowl or Lose four in a row? Which defines your teams place in history more ... 1yr wonder or Perennially 2nd best?

by Rudy916 on May 22, 2008 6:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Run_like_hell_small
Belichick Interview
Bills_small
Good future draft pick to keep an eye on.
Beast_small
To Lighten Up The Mood...
Small
Bills Coaching Future?
Jphshrink_small
The Back of Ralph Wilson’s Football Card
261x_small
Continuity will lead to success with Buffalo
Small
Fixing This Team Starts in the Trenches
Cody_small
Deja Vu All Over Again
122857_red_sox_angels_baseball_small
Anyone know of any updates on Kevin Everett?
Picture_2_small
Our best chance is keeping Jauron

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Dawgs By Nature
Week 9 Open Game Thread for Browns Fans
Pats Pulpit
GAME THREAD: New England Patriots v. Miami Dolphins, Foxboro, MA, Sunday November 8, 2009, 1:00pm
Field Gulls
Sunday Morning Open Thread

Editor-in-Chief

Dawesome_copy_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Homertexans_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM