New Details Surfacing in Lynch Case
By now, it's comon public knowledge that Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch has reached an agreement with Erie County DA Frank Clark to officially end - from this angle, at least - the affair stemming from his May 31 hit-and-run incident.
Less than 24 hours after the announcement, however, new details are beginning to surface about what happened exactly that night, thanks to some fine investigative reporting by The Buffalo News.
It is still unknown to what lesser charge Lynch will plead guilty to; we may not know the answer to that question until late next week. Whatever the charge is, however, Lynch is not expected to face jail time - in fact, he was unlikely to land in prison even when facing the prospect of the full charges. As was reported yesterday, the agreement was based around the fact that Lynch was driving the vehicle in question; he'll almost certainly admit to that fact this coming week.
The News is also reporting that the one player in the car with Lynch at the time of the accident was rookie Bills wide receiver Steve Johnson.
The cause of the accident may also be known to investigators, though the information comes from sources supportive of Lynch - so take it with a grain of salt:
Sources close to the case who have been supportive of the football player said Lynch may have hit Shpeley because his attention was diverted by another woman who was singing and dancing as both she and Shpeley were crossing the street.
Shpeley's representation, lawyer Timothy O'Connell, came forward last night with new testimony from Shpeley and the two unnamed women she was with on the night in question. In said testimony, the women claim that the driver of the SUV slowed, came to a stop, then sped off:
“After stopping for several seconds, the vehicle sped off at a high rate of speed. I think you could say the driver stepped on the gas,” O’Connell said. “What I surmise from that is that the driver slowed down and stopped, saw this injured woman lying there and took off.”
This new information directly contradicts what the DA has for testimony, however:
“From what we’ve been told, the SUV never slowed down. It just took off,” [Clark] said.
All Bills players and executives who were subpoenaed last week were excused as the agreement was reached. The name of the "unnamed executive" subpoenaed has been released; Bills director of security Chris Clark was reportedly in direct contact with Lynch mere hours after the incident took place:
Law enforcement officials said the text-messaging between Chris Clark and the running back began at least six hours after the accident. The officials said Buffalo police were upset to learn that, while refusing to talk to police, Lynch was talking to a team official about his situation.
Authorities said some of the text messages dealt with Lynch’s need to speak with an attorney and the Bills security chief advising him on his legal right to refuse to speak to anyone about the incident. Chris Clark is a former top official of the Erie County Sheriff’s Office.
Lynch's sentencing will come next week, putting to rest the most important of four angles from which Lynch could see punishment. Next up: a potential civil case from Shpeley and her attorney, O'Connell; Bills team discipline; and, perhaps most importantly of all, league discipline. The News has the last issue covered as well:
“We will look into it, and we will see what the facts are,” NFL spokesman Greg Aiello told The News late Friday.
This issue isn't over, folks, and punishment has yet to be doled out, but it's all falling action from here. The suspense is largely over. Now it's time to continue to wait to see how this directly effects the Bills on the field. Stay tuned.
0 recs |
44 comments
Comments
Driving away
Good thing there’s a discrepancy in what the DA is saying and what the victim is saying.
Sounds to me like Lynch was distracted, hit the woman and stopped when he realized that. Isn’t it very possible that the victim got up after being hit, so Lynch just figured she was alright? Not that he was right to leave, but it sounds like Lynch being an idiot more than anything.
I just hope this is over with soon. It’s gotten WAY TOO MUCH media attention in Buffalo and there have been so many unnecessary overreactions. This is a relatively minor crime and should be treated as one.
~K
by Kurupt on Jun 21, 2008 11:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pretty thorough, Brian
I think you’ve covered everything that’s publicly known, which is a LOT more than what you can find on the Bills home page. I like your analysis that Lynch is facing penalties from four different angles: criminal, civil, team, and league. It’s going to take awhile to sort itself out. I hope that all happens before July 25th.
Well, we really didn’t have any football to discuss this time of year anyway, so I suppose this will have to do for entertainment. What would we be talking about anyway – the latest injury-prone free agent tight end bust from Oakland that the Bills are passing on?
What in the world were we blogging about in mid June last year?
by Defensewinsgames on Jun 21, 2008 11:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A year ago today, we were talking about red zone (in)efficiency.
Oh, and a little over a week later, we had badass pictures of Christopher Walken.
by Brian Galliford on Jun 21, 2008 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and in case I wasn’t clear, the “thoroughness” you mentioned was all on behalf of The Buffalo News, not me. They get all the credit here.
by Brian Galliford on Jun 21, 2008 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DA and some media members/bloggers are A$$ CLOWNS
I think another apology is in order to James Hardy. Once again some members of the media and some rumblers have assumed that this guy was guilty before proven innocent. Poor guy has a label attached to him for no reason what so ever because of people’s presumptions. I felt all along that the DA attached his name to the investigation solely because of his past “discretions” and felt that he may have heard something during practices. I was so glad to read that he wasn’t no where near the incident on Chippewa that night. I just wish that the local afternoon radio personalities and Superfan82 would stop vilifying the kid and allow him the chance to rehabilitate his image and become an important member of the Bills and our community.
by the Skycap on Jun 21, 2008 12:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I believe that Hardy’s involvement – I’ll see if I can dig up the link – was that he was with Lynch earlier that evening, but did not go out on the town with Lynch. So the cops and the DA had every reason to subpoena Hardy, because he saw Lynch that day.
by Brian Galliford on Jun 21, 2008 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember seeing that story somewhere. I think one of the rumblers linked it....
If I recall correctly, Lynch stopped by Hardy’s place and got his hair done.
by Ron From NM on Jun 21, 2008 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Found it here.
According to police officials, Lynch and several other players spent part of that night getting their hair styled in the Orchard Park apartment of James Hardy, a rookie wide receiver.A local hairstylist who is a friend of veteran defensive back Donte Whitner was called to the apartment to work on the players’ hair, authorities said.
"[Lynch] and some of the others left Hardy’s apartment around 9:30 that night," said one source familiar with the case. "They made a stop somewhere else and then went down to Chippewa."
Police sources said Lynch and at least one other player went to an exotic dance club in Cheektowaga before spending time in Chippewa Street bars late on the night of May 30 and early on the morning of May 31. Investigators do not believe that Hardy was part of the Chippewa expedition.
by Brian Galliford on Jun 21, 2008 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least Hardy is doing the smart thing
Keeping his head down, and staying out of the bars to avoid any incidents happening before he gets his contract. Afterwards may be another story but for now he is being smart and concentrating on football, go Hardy!
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on Jun 21, 2008 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hardy
Part of the attempts to tie Hardy to the case (DA, media, people like us) may have arisen from more than just his checkered past. First, as the guy Buffalo’s offense has pinned playoff hopes on, he’s a big name. If you want to make headlines having big names involved helps—and the more the better. Second, he’s young and he was with Lynch at an earlier point in the evening. No, it doesn’t excuse anyone who tied Hardy to the hit-and-run. It is, however, easy to see how it happened.
by Ron From NM on Jun 21, 2008 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A small point, but... we're tying our playoff hopes to Hardy?
I know this wasn’t your main point, Ron, but could we at least wait to see if this rookie actually makes it onto the field before annoiting him to the Pro Bowl? If was going to nominate the guy we’re pinning our hopes to, it would be Edwards. Second choice, Lynch, and third, Evans. Those are your playmakers, and if they don’t perform, no playoffs.
I do concede your point that he is a name that’s been in the news and therefore it made sense for Clark to link him to the evening’s festivities.
Wonder which ``exotic dance club’’ (read strippers) the boys fancy?
by Defensewinsgames on Jun 21, 2008 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I think we are
Hardy is the lone signifcant on-field upgrade the offense has made during the offseason. Yes, Johnson might displace Reed but even if he does I’m not expecting too much out of him. The linemen, if Peters returns, will be the same as will the QB, RBs who see significant playing time, starting TE (Royal) and other starting WR (Evans). Buffalo is counting on Hardy in a big way to turn field goals into touchdowns.
Schonert can’t be much worse than Fairchild. (The ‘much’ is necessary as Mularkey was worse than Fairchild.) With that said, is he really going to have a lot of room to operate? Jauron is a close-to-the-vest kind of coach so I’d be surprised if the overall offensive outlook is different. I wouldn’t at all be surprised to hear Jauron/Schonert harp more on ‘execution’ than change.
The defense added what we all hope-and can reasonably believe-are upgrades on the defensive line. We can also hope that McKelvin will at least be the nickel corner this year and possibly displace Greer before the end of the season. Poz (I’m in the process of analyzing 14 of the centers Buffalo faced last season and have finished the Steelers and first Pats games….and Poz really stood out. He gave Mahan fits.) and Mitchell will help at LB. Even if all of that works out as well as we all hope it does, defense wasn’t the reason Buffalo was losing games last season.
The offense has to do a much better job and improvement will depend largely on Hardy….and Schonert if Jauron lets him run an actual offense.
by Ron From NM on Jun 21, 2008 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um, let me get this straight...
...you are in the process of analyzing 14 of the CENTERS that Buffalo faced? The centers – not the quarterbacks, running backs, or wideouts.
Clearly I have no idea who I am dealing with here.
by Defensewinsgames on Jun 21, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
My recorder took a dump during the Denver and Jacksonville games so I’m looking at the other 14 games, which should be 11 centers. Two down, twelve games to go. And, yes, I don’t have a life. Someone said something on an earlier thread (Kaisertown?) about how he agreed Fowler was the weak link but not as bad when compared to other centers. So far Mahan and Koppen (1st Pats game) have graded out higher than Fowler in both the run and passing games. I’m running a summer camp next week but then have a couple of weeks before the next camp begins. Hopefully I can get to the rest of the games in that two week break.
by Ron From NM on Jun 21, 2008 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
YOU ARE DA MAN
Kudos Ron for all the hard work you’ve been doing. Your vision must be quickly deteriorating watching all these games. Enjoy the camps too
~K
by Kurupt on Jun 21, 2008 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Geronimo, question for ya about Ron
Can you PLEASE get this man a job with the Bills so we can use his talents to improve the team on our scouting staff? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!!!!!
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on Jun 21, 2008 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've got more time than talent
The Bills absolutely must have someone who goes through all of the game film (much better than what’s available to people like us) for each player. Those same people absolutely must know that Fowler is hurting the team on run plays. For reasons that are their own, the team has not attempted to upgrade the center position since Fowler’s arrival.
Also, keep in mind that I make no attempt to ascertain why a lineman is or isn’t doing well. Fowler’s technique, strength, agility, or something else leads to a bad (or good—yes, he does have those) play. I’m strictly looking at how a player did on a given play, rating his overall effectiveness, and tracking whether his individual performance killed the play.
Well, time to get back to the Spanish. Rosetta Stone really is a good program, by the way, if you’re looking to get a good intro into a new language. If you have the time to devote to it, the 6 month online subscription is the way to go….$180 vs $500 for the discs.
by Ron From NM on Jun 21, 2008 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rosetta
Is that really a good program? I’ve been wondering for about two years. Don’t know anyone who has used it. Please throw some more details this way f you have the chance. Thanks in advance…
by krytime on Jun 21, 2008 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Certain languages only
I got Rosetta Stone as well and it is a great product, problem is I’m trying to learn Arabic. Only after I spent the money and started struggling to pick it up did I notice a lot of reviews saying that it was great for languages using the Latin alphabet, Italian, French, Spanish, etc. but not so great for those that don’t, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, etc.
McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year
by poz on Jun 21, 2008 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can only speak to the Spanish version
It’s intuitive, which is more than I can say for just about any other language learning program I’ve seen. Each level has about 12 core lessons and each lesson has between 3 and 15 sublessons. Each core lesson takes about 20-30 minutes and sublessons about 5-10 minutes. That’s why I suggest the subscription. I got the 6 month and will be done with all 3 levels of Spanish in about 3 months. If you put in 60-90 minutes a day the 3 month subscription is probably the best bet. Be aware that the subscription automatically renews so be sure to write down your date to cancel on your calendar…
I really like the speech recognition software, particularly when I’m having trouble with pronouncing a word. You can go to a subscreen and get a slowed down version of the phrase along with a digital voice pattern comparing yours to a native speakers. The sublessons focus on grammar (not in a diagramming sentences way), writing, speaking, pronounciation and a couple of other categories that escape me at the moment.
Overall, it’s a good introduction. Think about the vocabularly as a wide but shallow pool. It’s enough to get you started but you’re definitely not going to feel confident using the language in the real world without more practice. Living less than 100 miles from Mexico (and running a summer camp that includes US and Mexican students) it won’t be hard for me to find people to chat with. If you opt for something less common (I’d love to learn Japanese….what an angry sounding language!) you’re going to have a harder time finding people who can help you really develop your language skills.
by Ron From NM on Jun 21, 2008 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks man.
I figured where you are, knowing Spanish is a good thing. I can “kind of” read my way through it, but can’t even attempt to speak it. My career is taking a different turn, and I wonder if having another tool in my box of tricks will help.
by krytime on Jun 22, 2008 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Question remains...
How would Hardy know who was driving the car if he wasn’t there? The DA should have subpoenaed Brian or Ron from NM or even the hairstylist. And the fact remains that people piled on him without knowing the whole story.
by the Skycap on Jun 21, 2008 1:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Misreading
Hardy’s name was associated with this because Hardy was with Lynch that night. It was earlier in the evening than the accident, something that didn’t become clear until after the DA had started naming names. Hardy is a big name. Big names make for headlines, something papers and DAs both enjoy.
by Ron From NM on Jun 21, 2008 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did Hardy ever get accused of being in the car?
I don’t recall. I do remember the article mentioning Hardy was with Lynch at one point that evening. I don’t remember reading any lies about him being in the car. He was subpoenaed because he was with Lynch that night, so the DA was hoping to find out if he knew anything I’m assuming. Maybe not
~K
by Kurupt on Jun 21, 2008 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
He was assumed to have been one of the two teammates in the car by the above mentioned.
by the Skycap on Jun 22, 2008 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, he’s clearly a friend of Lynch/Johnson, and he was with them before the incident occurred… is it really that much of a stretch to think that Lynch or Johnson may have mentioned something to Hardy?
Ron, I don’t think this has to do with making headlines so much as it was trying to get information. Clark had his headline at that point.
by Brian Galliford on Jun 21, 2008 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where the hell has sireric been?
anyone else besides me notice that sireric has been uncharacteristically absent from discussion recently? Sireric, if your alive, please let us know!
McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year
by poz on Jun 21, 2008 3:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I noticed too
Maybe he found God and is giving his confession. That could take some time!!! Seriously, I hope everything is well with you, sereric.
by Joe P. on Jun 21, 2008 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sireric has been busy at his day job. He’s alive. :)
by Brian Galliford on Jun 21, 2008 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Busy with work he says
plus he’s got a young kid, so the summer months probably mean outdoors time…
~K
by Kurupt on Jun 21, 2008 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again
Just to give people who continue to think Marshawn will get suspended an idea of how outside Buffalo nobody is taking this as a major incident here is something for you to read:
“ESPN’s John Clayton believes there’s an “outside chance” Marshawn Lynch could face a one-game suspension after pleading guilty to leaving the scene of an accident next week. However, Clayton says the odds are against Lynch being disciplined at all. After Lynch pleads, the grand jury investigation against him will end. In a worst-case scenario, Lynch will get some probation time and pay a $500 fine.”
McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year
by poz on Jun 21, 2008 5:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Crap
Now he probably will get suspended since Clayton opened his fetus mouth.
I’m glad everyone’s coming around on Lynch either not getting suspended or only get a game or two. It never made sense to me that he would come close to seeing a half season or even full season suspension.
~K
by Kurupt on Jun 21, 2008 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the beginning,
it was really hard to know what happened, therefore what would happen to Lynch. I originally said 2-4 games. If there was more evidence against Lynch, the D.A. would not of had to make a deal to get his conviction. It could have been much worse. I think everyone was very luck in this case. Lets hope that “Lynch’s Chippewa Adventure” (one of the chapters in Lynch’s autobiography he will write some day to celebrate his induction into the hall of fame) has taught him and his teammates (Hardy, Johnson, Parrish, others???) a lesson.
by Joe P. on Jun 21, 2008 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been saying all along - one game, two at the most..
No one knows what’s going on in Goodell’s mind. He has the power and the right to hold players to a higher level of behavior than the law. Just becuase Lynch probably wil suffer no real criminal charges doesn’t mean he won’t be held accountable by the league.
As much as I would hate to see it happen, I wouldn’t shed tears if Lynch were to be suspended for a game or two. It would really hurt Buffalo, as a good start is the key to the season. But, it would send a message to the rest of the players in the league…
And I still say it’d be in Buffalo’s best interest to be proactive here. Get Lynch to agree to a one or two game “game check” suspension, giving the money to MADD, or some other charitable organization like it. I think if something like that happened, Goodell would surely let this go without any repercussions.
by krytime on Jun 21, 2008 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not a bad idea
Lynch and the Bills should get ahead of this thing, finally.
Uh, what is a game check worth to Marshawn again?
by Defensewinsgames on Jun 21, 2008 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It depends
I’m not sure how they figure it – if you take 1/16th of the base salary, or of the salary plus bonuses. If it’s just of the base salary, then it’s just around $23,500. Lynch (along with most other 1st or 2nd year players) has an incredibly low base salary because more than half his contract was guaranteed…
by Krenn on Jun 21, 2008 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
23 grand a week. I don't know how he gets by on that.
by Defensewinsgames on Jun 22, 2008 6:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
It also irritates me no end when professional athletes cry about needing to feed their families after they’ve been suspended for doing some stupid thing.
by Ron From NM on Jun 22, 2008 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except for Travis Henry. There are a lot of kids going hungry now that he’s out of a job…
by Krenn on Jun 22, 2008 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No they're not
That is why we have welfare, so irresponsible people can continue to be so. I am all for helping those who have unexpected troubles, but IMO the system rewards irresponsible behavior.
by Joe P. on Jun 22, 2008 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
such
generations of family members continuing to live off the system? I agree
McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year
by poz on Jun 22, 2008 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
such as rather
McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year
by poz on Jun 22, 2008 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





























