Examining the Evolution of Buffalo's Tampa 2
In two seasons as part of the Buffalo Bills' coaching staff, defensive coordinator Perry Fewell - under the tutelage of long-time defensive coach Dick Jauron - has completely revamped the Bills' defense, both in terms of philosophy and personnel. Gone are the days where big, lumbering defensive linemen paved the way for a group of excellent linebackers to make plays - the essence of the 3-4 defense used from the Super Bowl era right up through the early years of this decade. Lighter, quicker, and faster is the motto that Fewell and Jauron have preached for the past two seasons.
In 2008, however, that motto has been altered to a more appropriate and idealistic phrase: bigger, faster and stronger.
Earlier this off-season, we took a look at how 2008 personnel changes have left this defense bigger and stronger, especially in the front seven. Those were the obvious changes. But even prior to this off-season - in fact, even as far back as 2006 - Fewell has made some changes schematically that will likely carry over to his "new" defensive philosophy of 2008. Let's examine...
2006: Coverage Shifting
Back in the early portions of 2006, when the Tampa 2 defense was installed in Buffalo (Fewell brought it with him from Chicago, where he coached it under Lovie Smith), the Bills employed a scheme in which their two starting cornerbacks - at that time, Nate Clements and Terrence McGee - would line up on specific sides of the field, play in and play out. That scheming was exploited quickly by opposing offenses; by the end of the '06 season, Clements was matching up with the opposition's top receiver.
In 2007, Fewell reverted back to the cemented corner philosophy, as Clements' departure left the team without a clear-cut top cornerback. After giving up plenty of big plays in the season opening loss to Denver, however, that philosophy quickly reverted - Fewell then employed a mix of cementing and matching for the remainder of the season. Without a true "lock down" cornerback, Fewell didn't have the personnel to switch to a match-up secondary exclusively; it explains, in part, why Jabari Greer was left to cover Randy Moss so frequently.
The Front Seven and the blitz
Fewell's biggest changes in the front seven (again, aside from the size changes) will actually come in 2008; we'll get to those in a moment. For two seasons, the Bills had a rotation of defensive tackles that would play exclusively the one-technique or exclusively the three-technique; linebackers were meant to be light and speed-focused solely in the zone defense's gap-control run scheme.
After injuries decimated Buffalo's defensive end corps in 2007 - and it didn't help that the defensive ends who did play suffered a steep drop in production - Fewell started using the blitz far more frequently to attain the much-needed pass rush a Tampa 2 needs than he did in 2006. The blitzes were creative, too - the Bills offered some of their most exotic post-3-4 looks in a 25-24 Monday Night loss to the Dallas Cowboys.
What's Changing in 2008
Now, Buffalo's defense will likely function a bit differently for the start of the 2008 season. Gone are the exclusive one-tech and three-tech defensive tackles; Marcus Stroud, Kyle Williams, Spencer Johnson and John McCargo will each be asked to play both positions, and which they'll be playing will be decided by a given offensive play. Fewell is now asking his tackles to line up according to how the offense lines up, switching between one-tech and three-tech at will.
The blitz will likely remain a more prominent staple of the scheme as well. Clearly, Fewell prefers not to blitz (see: the entire 2006 season), but Buffalo's defensive line won't be able to generate pressure every play, and the team's three linebackers - especially Angelo Crowell - are very solid blitzers. Don't expect to see a lot of it, but the Bills will be blitzing more often than they would have when Fewell first took the job.
Since the blitz should be featured more, expect the match-up corner philosophy to gain prominence as well. That should become the main defensive back philosophy once top draft pick Leodis McKelvin emerges as a starting cornerback - he's by far the most talented corner on the roster, and with time, he should be able to match up with an opponent's top receiver each week.
The changes that Fewell are employing are pretty major tweaks that will help Buffalo's defense become much more flexible and effective, but the basic philosophies remain - penetration and speed are still the main focuses of this defense. It's still predominantly a zone defense. You'll still see every player flocking to the ball on every play. With added size and the proper tweaks, that speed/flocking philosophy should be much more effective in 2008.
1 recs |
7
comments
Read Related
Comments
I can't wait for the season to start.
There is hope, talk, and speculation surrounding every team at this time of the year. Ultimately, I don’t know what is going to happen until they start playing.
I literally have no clue what the Bills are going to do, offensively or defensively. It’s all talk and speculation until something happens on the field. I’m having a difficult time labeling the offense and defense a specific scheme or system (“West Coast”, “Tampa 2”, etc). That’s a good thing and I hope it stays that way. I don’t want the Bills to be limited to just one thing. Hopefully the Bills have the talent to play different schemes and different styles on both sides of the ball. That way, they can adjust to their advantage, win games in different ways versus different types of opponents, and therefore have the ability to win more consistently.
The defense could possbily feature 6 new starters: Stroud, McCargo, Posluszny, Mitchell, McKelvin, and Simpson.
I can’t wait to see what happens.
by Fort Worth on Jul 3, 2008 10:49 AM EDT 0 recs
McKelvin factor
He will be challenged and pushed early, and as much as we’ve heard from him, he seems up to the challenge. He has the support of the vets, i.e. Whitner who has let him stay in his house and go over film in their down time, and it is my guess, that much like previous top draft choices, McKelvin will see himself in the mix often and early.
Frankly, he needs to be, and if he has the top flight skills, I can’t wait to see him out there.
People always knock the preseason, and of course there is the risk of injury, etc., but this is where we will see how these guys look out on the field. It was clear last year who the better QB was in preseason, and many thought “Well, its ONLY preseason”, but it soon was clear that trent was our guy. Here’s to a strting McKelvin, and a better defense all around.
This town needs an enema!
by killascript on Jul 3, 2008 1:07 PM EDT 0 recs
The Value of Preseason
(To no one in particular):
It is what it is.
I also think the preseason is a little more valuable than what the average fan percieves it to be.
The preseason should provide some indication of the overall depth of your roster. Depth is important because Injuries are inevitable, special teams does matter, and the 53rd guy is important. It’s not just all about the 22 starters.
The 2007 preseason helped Jack Del Rio decide to start David Garrard and to release Byron Leftwich.
by Fort Worth on
Jul 3, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Butler
Preseason allowed Butler to overtake Preston. That alone made preseason worthwhile for Buffalo. If I remember right, the only Bill really injured last preseason was Denney—broken foot in the Saints game.
by Ron From NM on
Jul 3, 2008 2:21 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I remember some floating the theory
that the Bills were hiding their new high-powered offense, and that is why the offense looked so bad last preseason. Not even close to being the truth.
For a young team with so many new players that we expect to start, preseason is critical. Rookies get valuable game experience, and FA vets get a chance to gel with the other starters. It is the only way the coaches can see if they put the pieces of the puzzle together properly. Injuries are going to happen. Coaches have to weight the need for the individual player to gain experience at his position or with his line mates vs. the possibility of injury and adjust playing time accordingly.
by Joe P. on
Jul 3, 2008 3:26 PM EDT
up
0 recs
will be interesting
The defense still concerns me. There is a good chance Stroud isn’t healthy or at least won’t stay healthy all year. McCargo and WIlliams are still proving themselves, and the ends didnt have help last year, but looked awful regardless. The linebackers are solid, but nobody knows how Poz will progress or how Mitchell will fit in. McGee is a good CB, but McKelvin is a question mark. Whitner needs to dominate (but hasn’t shown the ability to do so yet), and Ko is coming back from an injury.
I know every unit has questions, but we have huge question marks at every defensive position. Despite all these issues, our potential and depth are intriguing. Also, we can’t do much worse than 30th or whatever we ended up last year, so that has to be viewed positively (I think). I really want this team to succeed, especially b/c I don’t think I can deal with another new set of coaches, schemes, and roster overhauls to fit those coaches and schemes.
by jmorris0823 on Jul 5, 2008 6:49 PM EDT 0 recs
I like the fact that
Fewell is adjusting his scheme this way. Letting the D-linemen pick where they line up based on the offensive look they’re getting is similar to making adjustments in the defensive backfield. It gives the players the chance to put themselves in position to make plays. Working together (i.e. – not getting in each other’s way) and film study will be more important than ever to give themselves the best chance to succeed. Even with the possibility of Stroud getting injured sometime during the season, I’m liking what I am seeing on the defensive side of the ball.
As you can probably tell from my user name, I’m not in favor of sitting back in zones all the time (but not all blitzes all the time either). In order to disrupt an opposing team’s offense, the key is making them uncomfortable, and mixing blitzes and zones into the play-calling makes the defense more unpredictable. Good D-line play will help the D even more. Let’s hope we get our money’s worth this season.
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Jul 7, 2008 11:41 AM EDT 0 recs
















