Bills/Redskins: First Half Film Session
As promised, I've reviewed Saturday night's broadcast of the Buffalo Bills' pre-season opening 17-14 loss to the Washington Redskins. And, as promised, I took plenty of notes and hit the rewind button often in an attempt to get more nitty gritty details on Buffalo's personnel lineups and overall play Saturday night.
I've only had time to rifle through the first half thus far; rest assured that we'll talk about the scrubs either tomorrow or Wednesday. For now, here's what I noticed re-watching the Redskins game in our first ever Buffalo Rumblings Film Session:
Quarterbacks: Now is definitely not the time to freak out about Trent Edwards' poor performance. He just needs to play more. Trent did make some bad reads while he played - both throws to Schouman, for example, were forced balls - but he's still doing the one thing that Dick Jauron wants him to do: getting the ball out quickly and, for the most part, accurately. It's high time that Jauron sacrifice some of J.P. Losman's pre-season playing time to get Edwards some more experience reading defenses; it's quite clear that Losman doesn't need a ton of time after his strong performance Saturday. Losman was, quite simply, in the zone. He had one poor throw (the slant to Roscoe Parrish on third and goal); the rest was excellent work upon further review.
Running Backs: Not much to report here. Fred Jackson got most of the work in the first half, and he played as advertised. He looked good, but didn't stand out in any way. Jauron did the right thing by limiting Marshawn Lynch to three carries - he doesn't need to work this early.
Fullbacks/Tight Ends: I thought Derek Schouman played poorly. He doesn't play as fast in games as he does on the practice field; it is clear, however, that Edwards likes throwing his way. Derek Fine looked smoother than anticipated; he did, however, whiff badly on a blitz pickup, which led to a Losman sack. I am glad, however, that Darian Barnes is part of this team - I didn't realize how much I missed a good old fashioned lead blocker until I saw Barnes popping linebackers in the hole. He looks like a good acquisition.
Wide Receivers: If you want a scapegoat for Buffalo's first-team offense issues, blame James Hardy. He was routinely lined up out of position, missed some pre-snap motions, and was responsible for a false start, a near-false start, and a timeout. He also misread the Redskins' defense on third and goal with Edwards under center. Washington was blitzing from Hardy's side; Hardy should have read that blitz and cut his route off. That's exactly where Edwards threw it, but Hardy wasn't home. He's got a long way to go before he's an every-down receiver.
I really liked what I saw out of Roscoe Parrish; he might be ready for a break-out season of sorts. I hope to see more of Justin Jenkins as well - he looks smooth operating out of the slot and is a bit bulkier than Buffalo's top two slot options, Parrish and Josh Reed. Jenkins is a virtual lock to make the final roster.
Offensive Line: For a first-team analysis, see Ron from NM's FanPost. I saw nothing different than he did re-watching the first half. The second team line was comprised of Matt Murphy (LT), Christian Gaddis (LG), Duke Preston (C), Jason Whittle (RG) and Kirk Chambers (RT; also started). I was particularly impressed with Murphy - he looked great in pass protection against a very good Redskins DE in Chris Wilson. He's still raw at the position, however, so don't expect an immediate contribution. Preston also fared well; he was the man responsible for blowing open a huge hole on Fred Jackson's 11-yard screen pass. Gaddis was disappointing; he missed his assignment badly on a stunt on the Losman-to-Parrish deep throw. Gaddis was the reason Losman had to throw that off his back foot.
Offense General: Clearly, Buffalo's offense could have played better. But don't blame the short throws the Bills employed on Turk Schonert - he's done a great job giving Edwards options. On two poor reads by Edwards, Schonert had layered his receivers' routes so that, within the same throwing lane, there was a short and deep option for Edwards. Both times, the deeper route was open for Trent, and both times, he forced it to Schouman underneath. Edwards telegraphs his passes in an obvious way; Schonert may have built in an offense wrinkle to hide that weakness.
Defensive Line: Buffalo's starting defensive line got one series, and I thought they looked great. Marcus Stroud looks great, and the Redskins threw double teams at him quite often (he did get dominated by two 'Skins linemen once, but otherwise was a force up front). I also thought the defensive ends looked disruptive, though clearly, they didn't play much. Stroud and Aaron Schobel were pulled after the first series. (By the way - there's no reason to knock Buffalo's pass rush after this game, either. Washington threw so many balls off of three-step drops that there was no chance for the Bills to get any pass rush going. Buffalo's blitz, however, did look weak.)
That's when things got interesting. Spencer Johnson replaced Stroud inside and played all right; when Chris Kelsay left the game for good, however, Johnson slid out to defensive end for early downs (Chris Ellis replaced him on later downs). Speaking of Ellis, I thought he looked good - he's quick and a bit more powerful than I imagined he would be. He wasn't a liability in the run game, either. He played a lot, which is good for him. (Now Jauron just needs to employ the same philosophy with his starting quarterback.)
One last D-Line note: Jason Jefferson is terrible, whether he's lined up at tackle or end. He's worse at end. The guy defines the word "mediocre", and he's routinely five yards up field and out of position. This guy can't get off our roster fast enough.
Linebackers: Buffalo's defense gave up some plays in the passing game, but don't blame the corners - the Bills' linebackers are currently pretty bad in coverage. Both Paul Posluszny and John DiGiorgio are consistently a yard or two too deep or a step slow getting to the receiver. Kawika Mitchell displayed a similar trait (while also looking great defending the run). Buffalo's corners took some heat for some slant routes being completed, but the corners, in reality, were blanketing their receivers - the linebackers were just a bit off with their responsibilities. Right now, the linebackers are the weakness of the defense, but their play isn't far off from being good.
Cornerbacks: In short, these guys looked great. Five corners saw action in the first half (Terrence McGee sat this one out), but the best performer of them all was, of course, Ashton Youboty. Youboty showed a physicality we haven't seen from him to date - he's an excellent tackler. He also did very well in coverage and didn't make any mistakes. His INT was a gift, however - Todd Collins should never have thrown that ball. What got me most excited about Youboty was seeing him talk some smack with Redskins WR Santana Moss; I don't think I've seen that type of confidence out of Youboty before. He looked great; I wouldn't be shocked if he pushed Jabari Greer (whose play was solid as well) for a starting spot.
Will James saw the most time in the slot, and while his play was generally good (his coverage was better than good), he did miss a tackle pretty badly on a screen pass. Reggie Corner was the dime back (again, with McGee out of the lineup), and while he made some alignment mistakes and gave up some throws, he also showed pretty good instincts. I like his future as the nickel back.
Leodis McKelvin made one big error - ducking inside a block rather than engaging it - and it led to a touchdown. Other than that, he looked good in coverage (and great on kick/punt returns), but his body doesn't look NFL-ready to me. He's really quite small. I still think he's a starter by season's end, but he's probably fourth on the depth chart - at best - right now.
In all, I liked what I saw out of all five of Buffalo's corners - but if I had to pick a guy most likely to be released, I'm going with James.
Safeties: Not good, folks. Ko Simpson was terrible, both on the blitz and in run support. He was in the box a lot more than expected, with Bryan Scott playing deep. Look for opponents to try to exploit that this season. John Wendling, in my opinion, should be playing linebacker - he's OK by the line of srimmage, but a nightmare deep. He hits hard. He did, however, miss Ladell Betts badly on a draw play that led to big yardage. He's quite green, and shouldn't see the field as a defender this season.
Special Teams: Monitored this closely for personnel. Kick and punt coverage starting lineups listed below; these are a good indicator as to who Bobby April likes on his units, and who, therefore, stands a good shot at making the roster as of today:
Kick Coverage: Blake Costanzo, Justin Jenkins, Will James, John DiGiorgio, Keith Ellison, Derek Schouman, John Wendling, Donnie Spragan, Bryan Scott, Dustin Fox
Punt Coverage: John Wendling, Justin Jenkins (gunners); Ryan Neill (long snapper); George Wilson, Derek Fine, Blake Costanzo, Bryan Scott, John DiGiorgio, Keith Ellison, Donnie Spragan
Dwayne Wright, Duke Preston, Kirk Chambers, Kyle Williams, Marcus Buggs and Darian Barnes all saw coverage or blocking responsibilities in the first half as well. Blake Costanzo surprised me; he was on the field for nearly every special teams play in the first half and played very well. Is it possible he's a lock to make the roster?
Feel free to discuss/ask questions/leave your thoughts in the comments section.
0 recs |
63 comments
Comments
McCargo
Even though McCargo played well into the third quarter, there did not appear to be anything special that he did going against second and third stringers. Did anyone see anything different?
by LGB on
Aug 11, 2008 10:03 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He didn’t stand out in any way, though he didn’t exactly play poorly either.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 10:12 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The quarterback position is always relevant.
Edwards is going to be the guy because his style matches Jauron’s style. The problem with this is Jauron’s style has not proven to be successful. If you want a different output, try a different input.
Edwards still looks scared and plays passively. You can see it in his eyes and then he always looks to throw short. Doesn’t that bother anyone? I want to like Edwards. However, I also want a quarterback that wants to and has the ability to make big plays with his arm (rather than soley relying on the receivers to get YAC). To do that, sometimes you have to take chances. I’m looking for Edwards to show more confidence, aggressiveness, fearlessness, and guts. Pure dink-and-dunk will make the offense too easy to defend.
It’s too early to tell right now, but as the season progresses, if one player clearly and consistently looks better than another…
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 10:29 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
D
i’m glad to hear our ends look good, especially Ellis, i really think the 4th end is gonig to make the difference late in the fourth quarter. last year our line was so run down and tired we just didnt have the depth, obvioulsy injuries didnt help, but Ellis should really be able to make a large contribution this year.
dont 'be worried about the way Edwards looked, he needs 2 more games to get a feel for live football again and in preseason the offense never shows the playbook.
hey Fort Worh have you gone to the Bills bar by TCU yet? it’s called Buffalo Bros, pretty decent food (doesnt compare to real buffalo wings) atmosphere is great, a lot of pictures of Buffalo. not sure if they will play the Bills games though.
by pastj12345 on
Aug 11, 2008 11:11 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Bills bar by TCU
Nice. I’ll have to check that out sometime. Thanks pastj12345!
It would be nice to get away from all the Dallas Cowboys garbage and their spoiled fans down here. 52-17 and 30-13. That’s what I usually hear from them.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Simpsons-esque and Movement
I can’t help thinking the offense looked like the Denver Broncos team on the Simpsons when Homer becomes their owner. They were all standing in Homer’s yard with footballs bouncing off helmets.
But seriously, does any of the pre-snap motion by the WR and TE’s had any positive effect on getting open or is it all just for show?
by south123 on
Aug 11, 2008 11:30 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the pre-snap movement is designed to create mismatches more than being “for show”. Not saying I like it, though. Too complex for the first pre-season game.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 11:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The movement can also help the QB read the defense. The D is more likely to shift around with the offense if they are playing man and they typically don’t move at all if they are in zone. The QB should also be able to detect blitz a little better when theres offensive motion.
by kaisertown on
Aug 11, 2008 11:40 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good point. Doesn’t seem to help very often.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 11:41 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Men in motion
I was happy to see a little pre snap movement as I think it will help Roscoe get a little seperation at the line if nothing else. TE has to get his act together soon or we are gonna have another QB controversy on our hand and that isn’t good for anyone. I still like JP but will pull for TE to a certain point but I will say this, Edwards plays the most boring style of football that I have ever seen. Dink and dunk, always the safe play is just yawn inducing. If we are gonna lose lets take some chances and have some fun. JP takes too many chances and TE doesn’t take enough and it all ends up the same way.
by bflobob8 on
Aug 11, 2008 11:48 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
A couple more thoughts on McKelvin
Although he may not be very big/strong right now, I did see him nearly stalemate one of Washington’s receivers (I think it was Anthony Mix, listed at 6-5, 235), but then he got pushed back out of bounds.
On his big punt return, after he got past the punter, I wonder if he could have scored if he had ran straight upfield rather than cutting back against the grain. Just nitpicking, I guess.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 11:54 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He actually mentioned that post-game, Fort Worth – he said he thought he saw someone to the right so swung left. He regretted it post-game. He knows if he’d stayed the course he would have scored…
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 11:55 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Anthony Mix is actually listed at 243 pounds at the Redskins site. He is more like a defensive end than a WR.
by kaisertown on
Aug 11, 2008 12:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually, I do know of a 243-pound defensive end...
After Mix caught a pass, I was glad to see McKelvin face him up rather than dive for the shoestrings.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 12:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Log Jam at Corner
Boy, I thought it at the time of the draft and I am more puzzled by it now - don’t we have too many corners? I would hate for our top pick (the 11th pick, no less) to sit this year out as a 4th or, more currently, 5th or 6th CB (and what about next year?). I guess he could take over as the KR (even last year, many thought McGee would be better served resting), but you just don’t use an 11th pick as a return guy (especially since we have a good one already). James, Youboty and Corner looked very solid and perfect for their place in the position (3rd, nickel, dime CBs). I think we definitely keep 6 CBs - possibly trade one of the CBs (for an OT or TE?); maybe we were showing the league Youboty’s talent so that we can get better value for him.
by labill on
Aug 11, 2008 12:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ve never been sold on Ko Simpson. I was surprised to see that he was simply given his starting job back coming off injury. I thought George Wilson was exceptional last year in Simpson’s stead, especially considering he had just made the conversion from receiver. This leads me to believe that he’s only going to get better. Also: weren’t the bills like 7-3 with Wilson as a starter?
by spavery on
Aug 11, 2008 12:34 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ko
I thought Ko was too much hype his rookie season. He lacks the speed needed to cover ground back there, and he looks out of position way too often. I think he is a huge liability. He is just awkward, not a great tackler, and does not have good instincts and he isn’t a playmaker. I’d rather see Wilson back there. Well, actually I would have rather have seen Marlon Mcree back there.
MARVelous
by MARVelous on
Aug 11, 2008 12:57 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You make it sound like Simpson is awful; he isn’t. He does have good instincts and he is a playmaker, make no mistake about that. I think his problem Saturday was the fact that it was the first time he’d taken part in live football since the Broncos opener last season.
He deserves to start. He’s better than Wilson. He has a chance to get much better. Not saying it’s a lock, but it’s close.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 12:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He's not THAT good though
a playmaker? hardly.
He’s a poor tackler, which is quite obvious, takes bad angles and is pretty slow. I know he’s still coming off his injury, but he wasn’t that great to start with. He’s better than Wilson, but that doesn’t say much.
Our FS position is going to be one of the weaker spots on the D along with DE and potentially MLB depending on Poz’s growth.
~K
by Kurupt on
Aug 11, 2008 1:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think he’s more of a playmaker than Donte Whitner at this point… he’s played a season less and has the same amount of interceptions, after all.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 2:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Simpson
also had a sack and a forced fumble in his rookie year in 2006. Donte who?
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 2:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Simpson
ok so i was a little hard on him, but I think he is well below-average. He is not fluid at all and you cannot tell me he has good instincts and is a playmaker. What examples? I remember time and time again his rookie season allowing WR’s to catch 20-25 yd deep outs and him being so slow he couldn’t get over there and even make hits on the Wide outs.
I’ll give him time to readjust to the speed and come back from ankle surgery which I’m sure is tough on him. But, I think he is the weak link back there
MARVelous
by MARVelous on
Aug 11, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Totally agree with you Marv
I don’t see how Simpson is instinctual or a playmaker in any way.
~K
by Kurupt on
Aug 11, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The fact that he can make plays despite being a below-average athlete proves that he’s instinctual. I’m not saying that he’s the second coming of Mark Kelso – or even that he’s good – just that you guys are selling the guy short.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 2:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What plays has he made
Intercepting a tipped pass? His other INT being on a Hail Mary? I don’t consider him a playmaker in any way whatsoever. He was pretty much non-existent 95% of the time his rookie year….
~K
by Kurupt on
Aug 11, 2008 3:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Again… if there’s consternation for Simpson, why is there not consternation for Whitner? Because he’s a “leader”? Just curious…
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 3:10 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You know my thoughts on Whitner
I mentioned him in a post below.
I have plenty of issues with Whitner and his play. Love his leadership, but his play leaves a lot to be desired.
~K
by Kurupt on
Aug 11, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and
the only INT i remember was against he packers and it was a tipped ball that dropped into his lap
MARVelous
by MARVelous on
Aug 11, 2008 1:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He had one in Detroit where he crossed about half the field quickly and nabbed a Kitna pass.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 2:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
along the left sideline in front of Roy Williams
Simpson tracked that one down.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 2:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Stroud double-teamed?
Either I need to watch the game again or I don’t know what a double team is, but I recall Stroud getting single-blocked on most of the snaps that he was in the game.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 1:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I remember on one passing play where he was easily neutralized by one blocker at the LOS…
~K
by Kurupt on
Aug 11, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Bills must be real happy with Stroud
He might have played 4 snaps.
by LGB on
Aug 11, 2008 2:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You recall him being single-blocked on most of the PASSING snaps that he was in for. He faced double teams on the runs.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 2:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for this Brian.
How did Demetrius Bell look? Completely unready? A potential contributor by the end of the season? Interesting to hear about Murphy, what about his run blocking? Who the heck is Chris Wilson?
You seem to have changed your mind on Youboty from one game….didn’t you see him as the last CB before? Now he may fight for a starting spot? I hope he does, because Greer is pretty mediocre at best, but he still has a lot more to prove.
I think we keep 6 simply because of McKelvin/Corner’s learning curve and the injuries we’ve had at the position in the past. We can’t be signing street FA’s again this year. I don’t see Corner contributing much early on, if at all this year.
Jason Jefferson is terrible, but we’ve known that for a while. I still don’t know how he’s stuck around this long. How did Terez McCray look?
I’ll leave it at this…I wish we had better safeties and DE’s…..
~K
by Kurupt on
Aug 11, 2008 1:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
safeties?? you mean fs
whitner is probably ;all pro. we can only hope stroud, helps the pass rush and the safties will have to hold their breath. I wish Bruce would have had a legit nose tackle. he would have lead the universe in sacks
by Bluebill on
Aug 11, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no i mean safeties
Whitner hasn’t impressed me much in his young career. He’s nowhere near an all-pro at this point. I don’t want him replaced, but I do want him to play much better and up to his hype and draft position. He’s gotta make a bigger impact.
Jeff Wright was pretty solid.
~K
by Kurupt on
Aug 11, 2008 3:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Chris Wilson is a 6’4’’ 247 pound speed rusher who played at a tiny school and then spent a couple seasons in the CFL. He was a surprise last year and had 5 sacks as a situational pass rusher.
by kaisertown on
Aug 11, 2008 2:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Haven’t gotten to Demetrius Bell or Teraz McCray yet because this is only the first half.
I still think Youboty is the last cornerback in the top six. Which isn’t fair. I think he should be pushing Greer to start; I think he will if he continues to play the way he did.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 2:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Edwards looked tentative
Forth Worth mentioned that Edwards looked scared and passive. It seems to me that whoever is the starting QB for the Bills suffers from that malady lately. Losman, when he was the starter, seemed to have the same problem. It’s like the pressure of holding on to the job makes them paranoid and that fear is actually what causes them in many cases to make mistakes. Losman played loose with nothing to lose and something to prove.
by southerntierfan on
Aug 11, 2008 1:47 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
TE looking tentative
I think TE is just trying to pick up a new offense. he really is still a rookie. LosTman will never be anything. he just doesnt have the decision making down and never will
by Bluebill on
Aug 11, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Never say never.
Just ask Terry Bradshaw and Drew Brees.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 2:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Losman
Except for 2005, I think Losman has always generally played with confidence, aggressiveness, fearlessness, and guts. He can and will take chances downfield; he wants to make big plays.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 2:02 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Brian, Great write up.........however i dont agree with your assessment of Losman
When I watched the game Losman didnt look all that great. Considering he is a former number 1 pick playing against 2nd and 3rd stringers, he played as I would “expect” him to. However a couple of things stand out. The pass to Roscoe in particular (the big gainer) was more of a just “throw it up and pray” luckily for him Roscoe made a great adjustment on a underthrown ball and was able to keep possession despite the fact that the DB had his hands on the ball as well. Other than that I saw on 3 other passes where the WR had to adjust to his throw, I would think that its a quarterback’s job to put the ball in the best position for his WR to make a better play (considering this a YAC oriented offense, or so im led to believe) instead of the WR having to adjust to the QB….i know the “numbers” are good…...but Im still not convinced…....lets see how he does in back to back games…...Consistancy is Losman’s worst enemy.
http://bills.sportsbloggingnetwork.com/
by norcaliangelsfan on
Aug 11, 2008 2:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He had one poor throw (the slant to Parrish near the end zone) and another iffy one (the backdoor play to Jenkins). That deep pass to Parrish was gold, man. I mentioned in the write-up that Christian Gaddis missed a stunt on that play, so Losman made that throw in the face of a blitzer. Given the choice between eating the ball/taking a sack and throwing it up to one of you playmakers in single coverage… well, Losman made the right decision. And it was a good throw.
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 2:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
had the DB been strong enough to wrestle that Ball from Roscoe......it wouldnt have looked so good.
http://bills.sportsbloggingnetwork.com/
by norcaliangelsfan on
Aug 11, 2008 2:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well you can make that case about any throw, ever, by any quarterback, ever. :)
by Brian Galliford on
Aug 11, 2008 2:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
touche'
Well the jury is “still out” for me for JP….....he’s had numerous chances to prove to me he’s the guy…......and one preseason game hasnt changed that…....atleast not yet….
http://bills.sportsbloggingnetwork.com/
by norcaliangelsfan on
Aug 11, 2008 6:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There was safety help over the top on that deep ball and if JP had thrown it where he wanted to it would have been picked off or Parrish would have gotten crushed.
The throw to Parrish over the middle of the field was a terrible throw too. Tasker criticized Parrish for stopping, but the ball ws thrown low and so far behind him that he had to stop in order to catch it. If Losman hits Parrish in stride that play goes for at least another 5 yards and knowing Parrish, could’ve gone for a huge gain. I actually thought that was Losman’s worst throw of the game, he missed by at least 5 feet.
by kaisertown on
Aug 11, 2008 3:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed about consistency.
While Losman was playing against 2nd stringers, he was also playing with 2nd stringers. He did just fine without Lee Evans. He threw several good balls in the game. Additionally, Losman’s dinged thumb may not be 100% (okay, that may be a stretch).
The fact that Losman wants to make big plays is a good thing. You can’t make shots that you don’t take. Sometimes you have to take chances and let your receiver make a play.
Hopefully this offense is more diversified rather than relying purely on YAC to make big plays in the passing game. Force defenses to defend the entire field. Create a nightmare for your opponent.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 2:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
losman
i think you guys need to stop worrying about our 2nd string QB. he is not taking over the starting position unless Edwards gets hurt. J.P. can throw for 6 TDs next game, he won’t start. You all saw edwards have a bad day on the first night practice, the next day he was more prepared and looked much sharper. he will do this throughout the season. we are gonig through a new offensive system again, but we know who is going to be the QB for the next couple years. i think everyone needs to be more concerned with the running game over the next few preseason games. our line needs to show it can move people, which it did not do that well last year. Lynch will look a lot better if he has holes to run through.
by pastj12345 on
Aug 11, 2008 5:01 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Worry?
What if I think that one player is better than another player (I’m not just referring to one preseason game)? Not to mention the fact that he touches the ball on every play.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Aug 11, 2008 5:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ruben Brown
Ron from NM, Ruben Brown is on Brad Riter’s show and he said he can play center “easily”. What do you think of him. Would he be an upgrade over Fowler?
by the Skycap on
Aug 11, 2008 6:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Mike McCarthy, Marvin Lewis
I like what these 2 coaches did tonight. They kept their offensive starters in the game until they did something positive/scored a TD. It helps/gives the unit confidence to succeed and develop a rhythm. I wish Jauron would have done that Sat. night. Hope he considers it Thursday. If Edwards comes out on his opening drive Thursday and score a TD, I’d remove him from the game but keep the starting O-line out there. You want your QB to remember his last play being a good one and allow the line to get some kind of continuity.
by the Skycap on
Aug 11, 2008 9:24 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
so if by some miracle the Bills score in like 4 plays or less........
you would want Edwards to be removed? I dont think so…..I think he should probably play close to a half for the next two preseason games.
http://bills.sportsbloggingnetwork.com/
by norcaliangelsfan on
Aug 11, 2008 9:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
















