Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Bills' Walker fitting in well at left tackle


  Walker's move to left tackle going smoothly (Photo Source)

It's not ideal - not for the Buffalo Bills, and especially not for Langston Walker.  When asked to do something different for his team, Walker hesitated - but only briefly.  He need not have worried - since that date (July 30), Walker has surprised in his new role as the Bills' starting left tackle.  His play has been so strong - stronger, perhaps, than in 2007, his first year as the team's right tackle - that the Bills' offensive line has remained a strength to date this pre-season.

Pass Protection a Team Strength
Even without holdout left tackle Jason Peters - with whom the Bills have not officially communicated since January 15 - Buffalo's pass protection has looked excellent through two pre-season games.  Trent Edwards has been sacked once in 25 offensive plays, and as a majority rule has had plenty of time to throw the football.  Walker has been at the forefront of that success - Buffalo's coaching staff has been quite willing to let Walker handle opposing speed rushers one on one, and while it was he who allowed the sack on Edwards, his pass blocking has otherwise been top-notch.

In fact, the Bills' offensive line does not look much less effective in pass protection this pre-season than they were in the latter stages of 2007, when Peters was still with the team.  Indeed, Walker's play - along with the steady play of Kirk Chambers at right tackle - has almost made Bills fans forget Peters when Edwards is dropping back to throw.

Walker has not, however, been as steady in the rushing attack (which is a fact that holds true for the entirety of Buffalo's starting offensive line).  We'll let Ron From NM, our resident O-Line guru, take it from here:

Walker had an up and down night with run blocking. He had two good runs, 1 and 7, and two bad runs, 2 and 3. He did decently on 5 runs. On runs 2 and 3 he was beaten on the first step. The LB ran right past the RB on run 2 and chased the play from behind on run 3. On run 1 Walker drove the DE 5 yards down the line away from the play and on run 7 he tossed a LB out of the run lane.

Jauron Impressed
Despite his shortcomings in the run department - and it's important to note that Buffalo's rushing attack was quite effective in its most recent pre-season game, a win over Pittsburgh - Dick Jauron has been impressed with Walker's play at left tackle thus far:

“I think Langston is really good so I anticipated he would do fine,” Jauron said. “He’s just a good football player left or right and he’s done well.”

As long as Walker is at left tackle, Bills fans can feel semi-comfortable about Buffalo's offensive line.  Walker has not been perfect, but he's been much better than anticipated on the left side.  What's more, the biggest worry with the switch (whether or not the 6'8", 366-pound Walker could handle speed rushers) has not yet manifested itself to the point where it's a glaring weakness for the offensive line.

Has Langston Walker made Bills fans forget the name Jason Peters?  Not even close, and he likely won't.  But his play has been a calming influence on an offense that might have been thrown into chaos by Peters' decision to hold out.  That in itself proves Walker's value to the team: he's done a great job holding the unit together until Peters returns.  That's far more than enough for now.

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Walker has been a surprise

and Chambers has not been a slouch on the right side, although I did wince when Trent almost got sacked for a safety when that speed rusher got by Walker. I have to admit to being a bit catastrophic in my predicitons before preseason about our chances without Peters, and so far have been proven wrong.
Just think how good this line could be with Peters back in there. Trent might look even better, and I bet they run off the left side more.

by Defensewinsgames on Aug 22, 2008 9:08 AM EDT reply actions  

Its the preason

I would absolutely love to believe Walker could step in for Peters adequately fill the massive void Peters is currently leaving vacant, but its the f-in preseason. In three and a half quarters of preseason football, Walker has looked serviceable. By no means does that make me believe that the bills offense is going anywhere w/o Peters. Walker is a liability for Edwards, a quarterback w/ injury problems, to have on his blindside. I’m not saying he isn’t serviceable, but all it takes is one missed block to ruin the Bills season.

by marshawnsanity on Aug 22, 2008 9:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes sir

My sentiments exactly.

We’ve already seen Walker get taken to school, and the combo of him and Chambers is nothing to be proud of. What happens when the pass rushers take it to the next level come the regular season? And it’s not like the run blocking has been that great either.

I, for one, am extremely worried about the current setup.

~K

by Kurupt on Aug 22, 2008 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

How many times has he been taken to school? Once?

by Brian Galliford on Aug 22, 2008 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

How many pass plays were not quick hitters?

Basically, are you comfortable with Walker at LT? I know I’m not. I’m ok with him in run situations, but when Edwards has to take 3-5 step drops, I’ll be holding my breath and I don’t see how other Bills fans won’t be doing the same.

He’s held his own, but he’s not quick enough to get out on speed rushers, which make up a lot of the pass rushers we face this year. If Peters is dumb enough to sit out any regular season games, Trent’s backside could a beating…

~K

by Kurupt on Aug 22, 2008 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yikes

that last line didn’t come out pleasantly…..

~K

by Kurupt on Aug 22, 2008 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also, see the following from jimkutica on ``body'' of evidence and

I think you can see that this thread is rapidly heading towards very predictable territory. Brian, I think it’s time for the mod to step in, here. We have you to thank for this, K.

by Defensewinsgames on Aug 22, 2008 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

What's wrong with it

You don’t agree? That’s cool. We do have to see more of Walker, but IMO, I’m nervous as can be about him at LT. Sorry if that’s such an issue for everyone….

~K

by Kurupt on Aug 22, 2008 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

No no, K. He was referring to your brutal last line and the “body” of work… get it? He was joking. Apparently I’m the only one with a sick enough mind to get it.

by Brian Galliford on Aug 22, 2008 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Was hoping so

I tend to be a bit slow on Fridays

~K

by Kurupt on Aug 22, 2008 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

3-5 step drops are designed to get rid of the ball quickly, that shouldn’t be a concern. the 7 step drops are what could cause problems. my guess is 7 step drops will start with a play action fake to temporarily (at least hopefully) freeze the end.

by gatornation on Aug 22, 2008 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many pass plays were not quick hitters?

Not many, but why does that matter? That’s Turk Schonert’s offense, and that’s the only offense that Walker needs to be able to block for.

by Brian Galliford on Aug 22, 2008 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes yes yes I know

It’s just we WILL be using those 5-7 step drops (that’s what I meant above) at times this year, especially if we actually do throw downfield more. In the limited action we’ve seen, Walker looks like he’ll struggle a bit or worse. I hope it isn’t an issue, but I’m thinking it will be.

This whole conversation is hopefully rendered moot in the next week or so…..

~K

by Kurupt on Aug 22, 2008 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

O-line

we don’t have much of a body of evidence for or against Walker at left takle, Chambers or the entire starting offense for that matter. Sundays game with the Colts and Dewight Freeny should be more telling as the first stringers get a good deal more PT.

by jimkutica on Aug 22, 2008 10:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Walker's play

has been commendable, considering who he’s replaced in the lineup. At least in this offensive scheme we don’t have a ton of 5 and 7-step drops for Edwards…

There’s no question I want Peters back, but Walker hasn’t been that bad. Turk will just have to be a little more careful not to put Walker in a bad situation which would expose Edwards.

Get the Bills back to the big game!

by Blitz on Aug 22, 2008 10:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Walker at RT

I hope Walker is getting plenty of reps at RT, as well, in the practices (is he doing double time? Is he practicing RT at all?) — the last thing we want is for Peters to return on the day before the game against Seattle and Walker goes back to RT, being totally confused about the calls (mirroring LT) and we’ll have two tackles basically playing like its the first day of camp. Boy, has Peters really screwed us.

by labill on Aug 22, 2008 12:55 PM EDT reply actions  

He isn’t practicing at RT, but I wouldn’t be concerned about it – he’s played the position for years. If Peters shows up, he’ll be fine moving back.

by Brian Galliford on Aug 22, 2008 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t imagine Peters coming back the day before the season starts. That’d be kind of pointless. If he does come back, the latest I can see is the Monday/Tuesday of that opening week, or sometime after the season starts….

~K

by Kurupt on Aug 22, 2008 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Finesse Offensive Tackles

Recent FanPosts

Truth1_small
What's the Diggity? Part 4
Jasper_in_space_small
A new idea for our CB position
Calvinhobbes_evil_small
Would You.......
Small
Here's what I think...
Pot_small
2012 OLB
Truth1_small
What's the Diggity? Part 3
Imagescata2xwh_small
Brandon Lloyd WR for the Biils?
Small
Buffalo adding picks
Thumb-10488_small
The Bills Not-Need Needs
09000d5d80a96824_video_rhr_280_210_copy_small
Who should be the next Super Bowl halftime show.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Lead Editors

Img_20110806_213313_small Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Senior Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Contributing Authors

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Site Moderators

Santa_bill_small poz

Billsdinosaurrider_small WABillsfan

Avatar31985_4_small silverstreak3k

3850_small JPH

211_talking_proud_1_small krytime