Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Mystery Man: DT McCargo outshone, outplayed in Bills exhibition season


McCargo currently the #4 DT in rotation (Photo Source)

Back in early March, mere hours after the Bills had made a splash by securing a trade for former Jaguars Pro Bowl DT Marcus Stroud, the Buffalo Bills appeared to have it made at the defensive tackle position.  Experts drooled at the potential that Stroud - along with free agent addition Spencer Johnson, imported on the same day - brought to a position that was a prominent weak point defensively in 2007.  Stroud would surely speed the development of the young man he'd be starting next to - 2006 first-round pick John McCargo, and the pair would surely work themselves into one of the better interior duos in the league.

Flash forward to less than two weeks prior to the start of the 2008 NFL regular season, and McCargo has quickly become a non-factor in Buffalo's defensive tackle rotation.  Sure, he's played a lot of snaps, and it's hard to say his play has been bad - we just can't be sure it's been good, either.  The young, developing talent that flashed big potential during the 2007 season has quickly fallen to fourth on the depth chart at his position.

The Oddity Of It All
What's strange about McCargo's absence from the defense - and yes, we're calling it an absence, because one solo tackle and two assists in three pre-season games is hardly an impact - is that the Bills' run defense has been superb to date.  In fact, Buffalo's first team defense, on the whole, has looked very good (dare we say "playoff caliber"?) in the short amount of time they've been on the field together.  Buffalo is producing defensively without much help from McCargo, who was expected to be a key cog in his third season.

Kyle Williams - drafted four rounds after McCargo in 2006 - and Johnson are competing for the starting spot that many assumed would be McCargo's.  Meanwhile, 97 barely shows up on game film.  If you explicitly pay attention to the tackle, you see the athleticism that made him a first round pick.  Yet despite playing well into the second half in each pre-season game this season, his presence has been negligible.  He's the Invisible Man amongst Buffalo's suddenly very good defensive tackle corps.

Too early for the "B" word?
Many might read this and hastily jump to the conclusion that McCargo was a wasted first round pick in 2006.  Some might even speak/type the feared "b-word" that has come to be associated with high draft picks who haven't turned themselves into serviceable NFL players.  I'm of the belief that such talk is premature.  McCargo's inconspicuous absence is slightly disconcerting, of course, but it's not a huge problem for the team until something happens with Stroud, Williams or Johnson.

My theory: McCargo has simply not found his role yet.  We know what we're getting out of the team's top three tackles: Stroud is the run stuffer; Williams is the hustler; Johnson is the versatile swing tackle.  Where does McCargo fit in?  Pass rush specialist?  Stroud's shoe-cleaner?  He has no distinctive niche yet.  When he finds that niche - and this goes with any NFL player - his play will elevate.  Until that time arrives, however, McCargo will remain Buffalo's very own Mystery Man.  (Or, more specifically, he would had Jason Peters not voluntarily joined the Witness Protection Program.)

0 recs  |  Comment 22 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

the Mystery Man

I think you’ll see a lot more out of McCargo once the season starts. DT in today’s NFL, specifically in the Tampa 2-style defense, requires a lot of rotation. Williams is a hustler, but when double teamed, he was sometimes run out of the play. Johnson will have to wait. I’m a bit worried that he may spend too much time at DE at the detriment of his time at DT. During the times he played DE this preseason, Johnson looked a little slow arriving at the play. I hope that our DEs will be effective enough to keep him inside.

I will say that it’s unlikely (now that Stroud has arrived) that McCargo will star at the position. He’ll just be part of that rotation.

by Dyl on Aug 27, 2008 2:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

BUST

wow I couldn’t even type it right, but there i said it.

by jimkutica on Aug 27, 2008 2:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

How do you figure? Can someone be a bust after 21 NFL games? Please, please, please explain.

by Brian Galliford on Aug 27, 2008 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

McCargo

First off I read nothing into his pre-season performance because pre-season play has never predicated the play you can expect to see in the regular season. I know the stats are not there for this guy but I have seen so many good plays from this guy. Sheer brute power, strength in many plays last year. Of course, the knock is consistency. I agree Brian, if his role is clearly determined I think he will take it and relish in it. I think McCargo is ready for a breakout year playing next to Stroud and in a rotation that will only boost his play. I’m a big believer in McCargo and is one guy on this defense I am not worried about at all. His offseason workouts have been stupendous and his motivation to be a good player in this league has never been in question. I’m on your side Big John and I saw how much penetration you got last year in that Dallas game I was at. McCargo will be fine, and I don’t see the “B” word anywhere near him

MARVelous

by MARVelous on Aug 27, 2008 3:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well said.

He probably won’t dominate, or star, now that Stroud is here, and that is enough for some people to think of him as a bust. We have a disparity of opinions before us, each based on different expectations of what ‘role’ JM is/should/will play.

I’m inclined to think that McCargo could fit into a role if the Bills find it, but then there’s also the chance that finding that role gets caught up in the other 25 or so players on our defense trying to find their roles. A pass-rushing DT might not be needed enough to give JM that recognition he’ll need to break into the starting lineup if, say, Kelsay/Schobel tee it off again this year.

by Dyl on Aug 27, 2008 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

WTF Mates?

Why would anyone even bring up the word bust? McCargo has played well in the preseason. In fact, the only guy who has not played the run well in our DT rotation is Spencer Johnson. I think the coaches gave him more reps in the pre-season and practice because he’s new to the team and they want a look at him. McCargo has a surgically repaired foot and is in no need of unnecessary risk.

And everybody hammers on about consistency… WHAT?! You all expect his name to be called on every play? Do y’all even watch him when he’s in there. He never gets pushed back, and usually gets good penetration, and sometimes just blows plays up. Bust? That’s just gossip, you’d think the Golden Girls started posting here. Besides, if John McCargo is your 4th tackle, then you don’t have DT problems.

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Aug 27, 2008 3:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

A little too early to tell, but I think we're better than last year

at tackle. And I agree that with the four of them healthy and competitive, we are starting the season in good shape.
I think tackle is one of those positions that looks good if the entire defense is playing well together. McCargo will get his props if Poz gets his tackles close to the line of scrimmage, and Schobel gets his sacks and pressures. The guys in the trenches aren’t wideouts. They don’t get much pub. But if they continue to play the way they have in the first three preseason games, I agree with you, Arrow. With these four, we’re in pretty good shape.

by Defensewinsgames on Aug 27, 2008 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never said we had “DT problems”, Arrow. In fact, I’m fairly certain I’ve said before that defensive tackle is now the strongest position on the team.

I just think there’s something to the fact that everyone expected this guy to start, and he’s now fourth in the rotation. It’s unexpected. Yes, he’ll play a lot. But he should be ready to make a much bigger impact than simply being a “rotation guy”, and we’ve seen no indications in 2008 that he’s ready to take that step. We saw it in 2007; unless the Bills are simply keeping him a secret, he seems to have regressed slightly.

by Brian Galliford on Aug 27, 2008 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stats for a DT

The stats aren’t any better for Stroud (1 solo tackle) or Johnson (2 solo, 1 assist) though! Tackles for a DT isn’t really the only factor in what makes them good; it’s the linebackers that get the tackles when a massive tackle takes up two blockers. After all, Stroud went to the Pro Bowl with just 32 tackles and 1 sack in 2005…

by Krenn on Aug 27, 2008 4:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

These are good points

But you would like to see a little bit more in the sack area. A run-stuffer still gets open ocassionally and gets to the QB, so to only have one sack all year isn’t what a dominant DT should hope for.

A possible explanation for McCargo’s lack of production could be level of effort. Due to his nasty injuries of the past that he has worked his way back from, maybe he is just holding back until it counts. When he lines up against Seattle, he could be ready to explode. We should all wait until its for real before passing any judgement.

He turned it on pretty good last year playing along side much lesser talent to learn from and compete with. The addition of Stroud showing him the way to do the job will only bring out much more and hopefully we’ll see why the Bills used a #1 to get him.

by JTM1023 on Aug 27, 2008 4:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

McCargo has lost a step and looks out of shape

At camp this year, McCargo has looked frustrated and sluggish at times, so now that he is supposedly healthy (after a real long history of assorted foot and ankle problems), he is slow and overweight. He was fined by the team for being overweight and he himself has admitted that he has lost a step.

So is he a bust?

Well as a first round pick, I would say yes – based on what I have seen so far. But it is not McCargos fault. I look at it from an impact perspective. So far he is not made a impact that a first rounder should make. But here is the real deal. McCargo did not draft himself. It was the Bills that moved up to take him and if McCargo never makes a high level impact, it could just be that the Bills made a mistake (like that has never happened before).

by LGB on Aug 27, 2008 6:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think Bust can be applied, but disappointment possibly in a couple of years

McCargo should NEVER have been drafted in the 1st round, that was a waste of that pick in a sense. He could have been had in the 2nd quite easily, and the Bills stunned alot of teams and not in a good way making that pick. We should have kept what we gave up to snag him in the mid 2s, but the choice has been made.

JM has been hurt a lot, and that WILL take a step away, but he is no bust. DTs can go many ways in their careers. It took Pat Williams almost 5 seasons to become one of the most dominant run stuffers in the league, and it may only take Dorsey or Ellis only one season to be dominant or 4 themselves, but we gotta give the kid time to find his role on our team. He showed flashes of being a penetrator last year stuffing the run behind the line of scrimmage in a couple of games, and well enough that I remember that fact. With Stroud there now, and the action going live in less than two weeks, I think we will find him doing OK. He may just be a guy who will never be more than a roational guy whose good for 50% of the snaps in a game at DT sharing time with Williams while Spencer steps in on occassion too.

Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....

by WABillsfan on Aug 27, 2008 7:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He could have been had in the 2nd quite easily, and the Bills stunned alot of teams and not in a good way making that pick.

I guarantee to you that teams were far more stunned with the Whitner pick than they were with McCargo. Had the Bills not traded up to take him at pick 26, the Giants would have drafted McCargo ahead of the man they eventually selected, Mathias Kiwanuka.

by Brian Galliford on Aug 27, 2008 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would have taken Kiwanuka quite happily

There are lots of fish in the sea Brian, and of DTs, there are very very many.

Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....

by WABillsfan on Aug 27, 2008 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kiwanuka?

How are DTs numerous? How many elites in the league? Lets see….Stroud, Wilfork, Rogers, Henderson, Pat Williams, Williams of the Chargers, who else? They really arent a dime a dozen. Meanwhile players like Kiwanuka, who is a below average DE and an above average OLB are nowhere near as valuable.

McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year

by poz on Aug 27, 2008 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never was arguing there were many elites, nor that JM was or will be one

Right now JM is a rotational player, of which more than 90% of DTs in the league are. Therefore, he is one of the dime a dozen crowd, nominally. As I said earlier: but we gotta give the kid time to find his role on our team. He showed flashes of being a penetrator last year stuffing the run behind the line of scrimmage in a couple of games, and well enough that I remember that fact.

I also pointed out that it took 5 seasons for Pat, and it may take as long for him as well. I think he could be one, as he is no better than a rotational man right now, BUT he could be more in time, he just needs to find a role. And there are many kids who come out of college looking for DT jobs, not many get them, but then again, there are no many jobs to be had are there?

Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....

by WABillsfan on Aug 27, 2008 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ah...i see

i thought you were insinuating that kiwanuka was who we should have taken because it is easy to find dominant DTs. And i agree with giving him more time to develop

McKelvin and Hardy - rookies of the year

by poz on Aug 27, 2008 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If as Brian said McCargo was gone by when we picked

Kiwanuka would have been an OK pickup in his stead if he was gone when we picked. I mean, we are looking at Crowell possibly not being reupped with us, so having Mathias, in a crazy way ,would be the better choice if Crowell walks. As you noted Kiwanuka is an above avergae OLB. BUT, we don’t have him, and instead got McCargo, and he will hopefully put the pedal to the metal in the regular season once it starts.

I really do hope he is like Pat and just needs time to grow into his role whatever it may be, but its hard to when your a Round 1 pick for people to give you that time. And as rcrumpley44 said, if he is doing what he is because thats what the staff wants, then best of luck JM and keep being a good soldier and teammate.

Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....

by WABillsfan on Aug 27, 2008 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe BUST is the wrong term

When I think bust, Erik Flowers and Mike Williams are the first Bills players that come to mind. McCargo is not at that level.

But I don’t get the comparison to Pat Williams who was an undrafted pickup by the Bills in 1998 ( it did not take 5 years for him to have an impact either – he had 3.5 sacks his first year).
Take a look

by LGB on Aug 27, 2008 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just wait and see

McCargo will do just fine. Perhaps one of the reasons McCargo is not next to Stroud, is because in the rotation he spells Stroud. We’ll see what happens come 9/7 and I think he will have an impact.

The Bills CAN win every game

by killascript on Aug 27, 2008 7:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Making yourself noticable isnt always the right thing to do

Sometimes you need players to step up and take on a role that is unexpected of them, its possible the coaching staff is asking McCargo to take on and draw double teams, fill and control gaps so other players can extend their own skills. If the bills first team is doing as well as you say they are, maybe its not the right thing to criticize him, and instead embrace the roll he is offering to the team.

by rcrumpley44 on Aug 27, 2008 9:15 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

McCargo

did come in overweight this year and THAT alone will cause him to lose a step. Why in heaven’s name did he come in overweight and out of shape? If I’m an important player on the Bills line and I see the steps OBD made to improve the D, I would surely NOT come in out of shape for summer preseason. So we may have a bit of a motivation problem here.
I thought the Bills would play McC next to Stroud so their two best DTs would play together. Now we have McC playing on the second line. The DLine rotation is so important in this system that it looks like the Bills coaching staff wants a better balance on both rotations. So the Bills are unhappy with McCargos weight but happy to put him in as the anchor of the second line rotation. They know how important he is.
I am a big McCargo fan and I hope he is getting pumped for the season. He might be another one who gives his best when the real games start. When motivated, he can be a beast. Get nasty John. And come to camp in shape from now on.

by keuka121 on Aug 28, 2008 12:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Vick to the Bills in 2010 "a good fit": Tony Dungy on NBC
Small
What Might Have Been: A Scenario
Run_like_hell_small
Belichick Interview
Bills_small
Good future draft pick to keep an eye on.
Beast_small
To Lighten Up The Mood...
Small
Bills Coaching Future?
Jphshrink_small
The Back of Ralph Wilson’s Football Card
261x_small
Continuity will lead to success with Buffalo
Small
Fixing This Team Starts in the Trenches
Cody_small
Deja Vu All Over Again

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Editor-in-Chief

Dawesome_copy_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Homertitans_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM