Bills/Jaguars: Three key matchups for Buffalo
All week, we - along with every other fan of the Buffalo Bills across the country - have talked about what it would mean if the Bills emerged victoriously from this weekend''s game in Jacksonville, where they'll take on a very good Jaguars team in just over a day's time. For a young Bills team that's on the upswing yet hasn't made the playoffs since the 1999-2000 season, a win in Jacksonville would be the biggest win for the franchise in recent memory.
Yet a victory is anything but a given. The Jaguars are coming off of an opening day loss to the Tennessee Titans, and despite the fact that they're banged up along the offensive line, this is the team's home opener, and the physical brand of football they prefer makes them a tough win for any opponent they face. This is a playoff team that the Bills are about to take on, with a solid head coach, tremendous athleticism, and an excellent quarterback in David Garrard as their leader. To expect victory would be foolish. But this is a winnable football game. If the Bills can exploit the following three matchups - along with taking care of business in five key areas - the Bills will dramatically increase their chances of pulling off a huge win tomorrow.
BUF LB Kawika Mitchell vs. JAX QB David Garrard
If I'm defensive coordinator Perry Fewell (and for the record, I'm glad I'm not - I'd be screwing up his good thing), my focus is on containing Garrard. Allowing the quarterback to make plays on the move would erase even a stellar performance otherwise by my defense. In order to contain Garrard, I'm not laying off on my blitz packages, I'm using a spy - and the guy I'm using is Kawika Mitchell. No Bills defender is better coming downhill than the free agent addition, and he has the athleticism to take care of Garrard in space. Donte Whitner is an option in spying Garrard as well.
BUF WR Lee Evans vs. JAX CB Drayton Florence
Last week, Buffalo's offense - while wildly inconsistent - was able to be effective enough for a dominant victory by exploiting favorable matchups. The biggest one that Buffalo hit on was when Seahawks CB Kelly Jennings lined up across the line of scrimmage from the team's top wideout, Lee Evans - Evans hauled in four passes for a whopping 102 yards, picking up yardage in large enough chunks to make up for a faulty ground game. The Jaguars will try to match up their top corner - Rashean Mathis - on Evans as often as possible, but when the Bills' top receiver draws Florence, he needs to make him pay.
BUF OGs Derrick Dockery/Brad Butler vs. JAX LB Mike Peterson
No, Buffalo's offensive line (more on them momentarily) won't be able to fully contain Jags DT John Henderson, because it's rarely done. Henderson is a key factor for the Jaguars, but the Bills should instead work on getting their mobile guards to the second level on run plays in the hopes of erasing MLB Mike Peterson. The 32-year-old linebacker was a bit of a liability in the team's loss to the Titans (though he played well overall), and if the Bills can get their hat on the veteran a few times in this game, it could lean to some long gainers by Marshawn Lynch. Picking up yardage in large chunks is crucial to success early on for Buffalo's young offense.
Game Notes
A few notes to pass your way this fine Saturday morning on what we're hearing about tomorrow's game. Important to note: we cannot actually confirm any of these developments. We trust that these things will come to fruition, but for the purposes of this post, let's refer to these notes as "informed speculation":
- Peters to play, start: We're hearing that Dick Jauron will announce later this afternoon that OT Jason Peters will play and start in this matchup - not a huge surprise. We're also hearing, however, that the team plans on shaking things up on the line for a series or two to keep Peters fresh (he's still not at 100% football shape), so expect to see Langston Walker on the left side and Kirk Chambers on the right occasionally as well. We have not heard, however, who the Bills will be releasing to make room for Peters on the active roster - I'm personally guessing it will be Demetrius Bell.
- Bills worried about heat: Buffalo will be taking precautions on what is expected to be a humid 94-degree day in Jacksonville. For starters, DT John McCargo is expected to be active as the Bills look to supplement their defensive line rotation (we believe that Xavier Omon will be inactive for this one, as the team won't sacrifice a specialist - risky, however, for Lynch and Fred Jackson).
Also, in an effort to preserve Terrence McGee's energies for his cornerback duties, don't be shocked to see Leodis McKelvin handle some kickoffs in select situations. Receiver James Hardy is also expected to play more as well as the Bills look to become more efficient attacking the middle of the field via the pass.
More as we hear it. Get ready for tomorrow's Open Game Thread, folks - it opens a half-hour before kickoff, 1ET. We're looking forward to chatting with you during tomorrow's big game.
0 recs |
18 comments
Comments
I totally agree about these being the most important matchups.
I would add Mathis to the Florence vs. Evans matchup. He has a knack for picking off balls on deep routes, but he also has a tendency to take obvious and very costly pass interference penalties on deep balls too. If Buffalo gets him in single coverage on Evans without help over the top, it could lead to the big turnover or big gainer that could determine who wins and who loses.
I heard Paul Hamilton on WGR yesterday, and while this obviously isn’t news, the team doesn’t have any specific plans to not play Peters the whole game. They more have a couple of different backup type scenarios depending on how he plays. If he looks great and lasts through the heat, he will play the whole game. If he just needs a few plays off here and there, you might see Chambers at LT. If he looks slow or tired, you could see a lot of Walker at LT and Chambers at RT. The Bills vs. the heat is as important of a matchup as any other in this game.
Hamilton also guessed that Bell would be released. I am confident that he will clear waivers and survive a season on the practice squad, so I won’t freak out if the Bills let him go, but with Chambers looking like an excellent 3rd tackle, what is the point of keeping Matt Murphy on this roster???
Don’t be shocked if James hardy is the player left inactive when McCargo suits up on sunday.
by kaisertown on
Sep 13, 2008 12:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I heard Hamilton mention that he thought Hardy would be the inactive guy. I think he’s wrong; our indications are that Hardy will be active and that he’ll see more reps, as I mentioned in the post. Xavier Omon will NOT be active. I think he goes to the inactive list for McCargo, not Hardy.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 13, 2008 12:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hardy inactive
makes no sense. He hasn’t looked overmatched thus far, just has the typical rookie WR learning curve. We need his size and ability to be a threat in the red zone. Omon does nothing for this team, so there’s no reason for him to be active over Hardy. In fact, Hardy will keep getting more plays and opportunities as the season progresses, not less.
I’d love to see the Bills use a double move when Evans is matched up w/Mathis. Mathis is aggressive and would likely bite on the quick pump. I don’t know why we don’t use more double moves with Evans…
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 13, 2008 12:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It’s not as if I expect Hardy to be inactive, I just wouldn’t be surprised.
by kaisertown on
Sep 13, 2008 2:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Butler-Peterson not a likely matchup
Butler will almost certainly be spending a large chunk of his afternoon helping Fowler deal with Henderson. Centers routinely need help with Henderson and Fowler will need more help than most. Barnes-Peterson is a more likely matchup. Given what I’ve seen of Barnes so far that matchup strongly favors the Jags. My prediction for yardage gained on the ground:
Lynch: 60ish yards on 20ish carries
Jackson: 25ish yards on 8ish carries
Edwards: 15ish yards on 2-3 scrambles
by Ron From NM on
Sep 13, 2008 1:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
My biggest matchup
One matchup that favors the Bills is Stroud vs. Jags patchwork interior line. If the Jags can’t contain Stroud, who we all expect to be highly motivated and know to be highly skilled, then the Bills stand a good chance of containing MJD and Taylor and pressuring Garrard. If that happens and our offense and special teams play well, the Bills have a good shot.
by Hopefulcynic on
Sep 13, 2008 1:54 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
stroud
needs to get in there and cause some mayhem for sure. thats gotta be one of the biggest keys.
by BillsFan119 on
Sep 13, 2008 2:31 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, yeah… I just figured it was so obvious it didn’t need to be mentioned here. :)
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 13, 2008 2:37 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hardy in more – Good for 3rd down production
McCargo – can prove his worth tomorrow, but if he looks bad against the Jags weakened line, that is bad
The Bills CAN win every game
by killascript on
Sep 13, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Peters activated
Murphy waived.
http://www.buffalobills.com/news/news.jsp?news_id=6594
by twoeightnine on
Sep 13, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Wait
you picked Bell to be released? Whaaaaaa? What made you think that an injured Murphy wouldn’t be the guy to go????
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 13, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Murphy was back practicing, and I figured there may be a chance that the team might think they could sneak Bell onto the practice squad.
It’s got to kill Jauron that Murphy was the guy to go. That guy killed himself for this team, and a returned holdout ended his stint with the club. Kind of sucks to be Matt Murphy today.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 13, 2008 5:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well
if Peters didn’t hold out Murphy wouldn’t have even made the opening day roster. I’m just surprised they didn’t IR him…
Is he a vested veteran? If so, at least he’ll get his full salary….
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 13, 2008 5:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The no IR thing is a telling point in my mind
The team obviously looked at the situation and figured out a couple of things for themselves. They may have looked like this:
1-Bell has shown some real talent at playing the game, he has quick feet, active hands, and looks to be a fast learner, the issue is lack of experience and bulk, all which can be added during this season and off-season. The issue is that alot of other teams looking for a good/solid backup project would make a play for him, say like the Ravens, Seahawks (Jones has only a couple of seasons left before he calls it quits), or even the Steelers who got to see him first hand in preason. I think the Bills think there was no way they would get him through waivers, much like Steve Johnson.
2- If Bell seems to be as good as the team looks like it thinks he is, and we the fans think he might be, who is the weakest link left? Chambers isn’t flashy, but solid and did OK/good filling in for Walker, Walker and Peters are the starters, and who does that leave to get rid of if they think Bell wouldn’t slide through Waivers if we only keep 4 tackles? Murph sadly.
I think the most telling issue is this, if the team was still really high on Murph, they could have claimed he reinjured his shoulder in practice and stashed him on PS. So either he is healthy and not good enough to stick, or they think he could slide down the PS again without danger of being Waivered wired by another team. I don’t know which, but I lean towards Waiver/not good enough.
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on
Sep 13, 2008 11:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You can't stash a guy on the PS who has played in 28 games.
I would think that Murphy was waived and not put on IR for a couple of reasons. He started practicing again this week, placing him on the IR would have ended his season completely. Besides the fact that the Bills would have gotten in trouble for lying about his injury that means that he wouldn’t be able to help the team at all this year. If a few guys go down and Murphy is still available he will be re-signed. It also wouldn’t surprise me if Jauron asked Murph what he wanted and if he feels that he can play again this year he said waive me. Once again the Bills could have found themselves in trouble with the NFLPA if they placed him on IR and he thought that he could play. Then there’s also the money factor. No IR means no money spent for the Bills.
by twoeightnine on
Sep 14, 2008 11:04 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Key matchup
Brian, I’m surprised Ron from NM didn’t chime in, Melvin Fowler vs. John Henderson has to be the biggest and most important matchup this week for the Bills. If Henderson is getting push up the middle it will blow up the run plays designed for Marshawn to the outside by allowing the LB’s to flow to the plays let alone eliminating runs through the “A” gaps. Henderson’s penetration can also be disruptive to the pass game. This is one game where Darian Barnes will have to make his money.
by the Skycap on
Sep 13, 2008 7:58 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ron did chip in. Mentioned Butler would be helping Fowler out on Henderson all day, it’s in a comment above.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 13, 2008 8:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
go bills
Here are some guys I want to show me something:
Trent Edwards: Show me you can step up and hit some throws down the field if your O-L gives you time. Lead this offense to 20+pts and we win this game
Pos – Show me you can make plays today. Jags will certainly try to pound the ball today and with Stroud eating up blockers, you are free to make plays. Be all over the field and tackle well
Whitner – Time to get an INT buddy. With Stroud and Johnson/Williams eating up the middle, and Schobel allowed to bring some heat, you have to be a ball hawk and grab a Garrard errant pass. Show me you can make a big play, cuz obviously none of your Buckeys could last night against USC
McGee – Show me you can return some kicks to the 40. Give us the field position we need. And keep playing hard, physical defense
MARVelous
by MARVelous on
Sep 14, 2008 11:28 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
















