Bills/Jaguars Film Review: Bills defense
The Buffalo Bills are coming off of their second straight win to open the 2008 NFL season, and since it's Tuesday, it's time for another Buffalo Rumblings Film Session to get into the finer details of Sunday's game. The Bills' defense performed quite well for a second consecutive week; let's break down the performance right now.
In two games, the Buffalo Bills' defense has given up just 26 points, held its opponents to under 100 rush yards in both contests, and been active enough to shut down two offenses that were quite good in 2007. This, folks, is no longer your read-and-react defense; it's now read, react and lay the bleeping lumber.
Poor tackling not a concern going forward
We noticed it during the game and it was just as ugly to watch again: Buffalo's tackling was sub par in this game. I counted a dozen badly missed tackles, and seven of those occurred in the Jaguars' offensive backfield. All twelve of those missed tackles came from guys who played in the front seven, and none of them were from Keith Ellison. No one guy was to blame; everybody (again, except Ellison) had a bad play or two. The team made up for it, however, with outstanding play in the secondary; more on that in a moment.
I'm not particularly concerned with this development because of the circumstances. I don't think we give David Garrard and Fred Taylor enough credit - they were able to wiggle out of some sticky situations because they're just really good players. It was also hot, so I'm chalking up a few of those misses to fatigue. It was ugly, but these are good football players that were missing these tackles - they'll turn it around.
Secondary the strength of D in Jacksonville
I can't overstate just how excited I am about Buffalo's secondary. There weren't any missed tackles by the six guys who saw the most playing time, and all of them were aggressive and hit hard. Obviously, Ashton Youboty got the most credit - he had three huge plays in this game, including two big tackles in the open field that stalled potential Jaguars touchdown drives. Jabari Greer also played well, contesting a lot of passes against much bigger receivers and hitting hard for a second straight week.
Donte Whitner, Ko Simpson, Bryan Scott and Terrence McGee all made big hits (and in McGee's case, big plays) in victory as well. This is not the same defensive backfield we watched last season, folks; schematic changes and a more aggressive nature have led to much more aggressive play through two games. Hits are made immediately after the catch (in fact, outside of a couple of screen receptions by Maurice Jones-Drew, the Jags probably had less than 10 YAC yards). The cushion that Perry Fewell prefers his corners to give is smaller. This unit saved Buffalo's defensive effort on Sunday, and as it's the deepest part of the defense, they should only continue to get better.
Confusion enough to keep Jags at bay
Buffalo went into this game with the idea that they would use stunts and disguised blitzes to confuse the Jaguars' makeshift interior offensive line; to an extent, it did the job. Buffalo recorded two sacks on the day (bringing their season total to 7, over a quarter of the total they had in 2007), and Garrard was forced to scramble on four occasions. As expected, Marcus Stroud was able to collapse the pocket several times from the middle of the line, but Buffalo's blitzers were not as effective getting to the quarterback as they were against Seattle.
The real purpose of the confusion, however, is to keep Jacksonville's offense off-balance - and that's exactly what it did. Fewell's scheme was once again excellent (so good it overcame poor tackling, in fact), and Garrard made only a handful of good throws downfield, most of them coming in the third quarter when Buffalo's defense was running on fumes. The Jags didn't come close to moving the ball effectively for much of this game, and when they did, the Bills made plays at the right time to snuff out drives. It wasn't a very pretty effort, but it was effective - and that's all they needed to pull out the win.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Did Ellison have a bad game or
are you referring to the fact that everybody hates Ellison to begin with?
Our secondary is very exciting and they are all pretty young. I would love to see more of Leodis but if Ashton is playing well, that’s absolutely fine. I have been a big supporter of Ashton since day one and he is really bringing it around. I don’t know how much this has to do with it, but Ohio St. usually turns out pretty good corners so he has some pedigree. Very bright future!
More the latter on Ellison. He played quite well.
by Brian Galliford on Sep 16, 2008 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Love for Greer
Last week I posted that I’ve yet to see anyone pick on Greer. The Jags clearly tried to do that in this game and Greer definately won the battle. This kid is tough. I know Youboti’s play has got people excited and they are going to start calling for him to take over at corner. They really are two different positions. Youboti is playing great football but that doesn’t mean the defense gets better if he takes over for Greer. They are both very valuable where they’re at.
One caveat
he hasn’t really faced any good recievers yet. Both the Seahawks and Jaguars WR corps were weakened by injuries.
I am not sure whom Greer was covering the most on Sunday but none of their guys had very good games. Matt Jones had 5 for 50 but Williams was held to 36.
Greer only had 3 tackles so either they avoided him or he got burned, don’t know which. I am pretty sure he got beat by Burleson in Week 1 for the TD.
I like Greer a lot, I hope he continues to improve. I’ll just worry about him (as with all of our secondary) until they shut down a good corps like Arizona.
by RabidBuffalo on Sep 16, 2008 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Remember...
Burleson made an outstanding catch for that TD and Hasselbeck put it where only Burleson could get it. Greer was all over him. McGee was the one who left Burleson wide open (he slipped) on the previous play when Burleson dropped the ball.
Also, to look at Greer’s effectiveness this weekend, you would have to include his stat on passes broken up, not just tackles.
by thefourwinds on Sep 16, 2008 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions
You mention Ellison
does that mean he was completely out of the plays, or actually did a solid job tackling? If it’s the latter, then he must be improving his tackling technique, because he’s been one of the worst tacklers on the team the past 2 years.
The secondary is definitely playing a lot better than last year, that’s for sure. A few things on that from me:
-I’ve noticed that we aren’t giving the cushion as much as in the past, but it’s still that a good chunk of the time. Any idea how often Fewell keeps the corners far off the ball? It seems like every time he does it, the opposition goes right to the WR’s short…
-I’ve been very happy with the play of McGee thus far. He’s stuck his nose in there in the run game, like usual, but he seems to be blanketing receivers this year. Again, we aren’t exactly play good WR’s here, but it’s still encouraging. I love that’s he’s been getting his hands on the ball a lot this year, with the 2 picks and a number of close calls. I love having guys who go after the ball back there.
-Greer has been pretty decent too. He’s been pretty close to some INT’s thus far, but seems more content going for the knockdown. Hopefully, he can turn a few of those into some gamechanging picks. I am calling it now, he gets a pick or two by the end of September….
-I’m still disappointed in the front 4’s pass rush. It seems we can only get pressure when we blitz, which is going to burn us soon. I do enjoy giving the QB much less time back there though, so in no way do I want the blitzing to stop. I just want to finally get some pressure without having to do so.
-The safeties have been solid, but far from spectacular. Whitner looks like the same old guy, good against the run, and doesn’t provide a whole lot of an impact in the pass game. I’ve noticed him make some tackles up on the line in the run game, but been non-existent in the secondary as a playmaker. This was something we all wanted him to improve on, but it just doesn’t seem like it’ll happen. Whether that’s the D we play or Whitner, I’m not totally sure, but I really wish our safeties were bigger playmakers like they are in other Cover 2 type schemes. I haven’t noticed Ko on D at all, which is probably good as a FS. We haven’t given up a big pass yet, to his credit, but again, let’s hope he starts making some plays. I have been thoroughly impressed by his play on ST’s, something I wasn’t expecting out of him. He seems to make every other tackle on kick coverage. I love that type of play.
I like what Fewell’s done thus far with the different looks, blitzes, alignments and personnel packages. I absolutely love when he brings Youboty off the corner, that kid is simply a playmaker. Nobody has mentioned how smart he is either. The kid always seems to make the right play with perfect technique. My favorite part of his sack was the chop at the ball he gave to Garrard. That is something you don’t see CB’s do too often, and again proves this kid is a playmaker that just knows how to go after the ball. It’s too bad Garrard is so strong and was able to hang on.
Question if you’ve noticed, how often is Scott in there? Just goalline, or does he take over for Simpson at times to slide Whitner into the FS role? I know we experimented with it last year and it’s been a possibility all off-season, but I haven’t really remembered to look for it….
~K
Whitner and Scott
I heard that Whitner played much of this game with one eye swollen shut after taking a hit making a tackle after his helmet had been knocked off.
Can’t answer your question about Scott, but man did he make a nice tackle on MJD on that 3rd and 1 when MJD hurt his ankle.
by thefourwinds on Sep 16, 2008 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Re Ellison: You’re the second person to wonder if I was joking; I assure you I wasn’t. Ellison played very well.
by Brian Galliford on Sep 16, 2008 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Youboty
Be careful on the love you give him. He’s not entirely out of “chateau bow wow” just yet. Myself, I’m glad that he’s played as well as he has the last two games. It was a continuation form the preseason. I had written him off prior to; I’m glad I was wrong. With that…
I too liked the ball swipe on Garrad. It was obvious he went for the ball and not the sack. I think that’s in line with Fewell’s way of thinking – get a turnover. Granted, they will give up chunks of yards at times. The cover two is a bend but don’t break defense predicated on turnovers. If they are able to create turnovers, it’s a fair trade.
Did you notice on both CB blitzes by Youboty, that Poz was up between the DT and DE, faking a blitz? I think that’s what caught them on the first one. On the second one, I was sure Poz would blitz and Youboty would drop back in coverage. Nope.
I called him a playmaker who’s very smart, I wasn’t exactly calling him a Pro Bowler, haha. When was he ever IN the dog house? He was injured for a good portion of last season and fell behind just like he had his rookie year. It’s not like he was ever on the field getting abused before. We’re really seeing him play extended plays for the first time in his career, and it’s not because he was benched. 2 cents.
Thing is, I haven’t really seen anyone else on the D swiping at the ball like Youboty has. I want to see more attempts like that.
~K
I'm curious
Was the tackling not good all game, or was it mainly in the second half after the heat and humidity (and a long Jags time of possession, 3rd quarter) did a number on them?
Get the Bills back to the big game!
How can you not be concerned about our poor tackling.
I’m excited that we are 2-0. Before the season I thought we be 1-1 now. We beat two playoff teams that were wounded. Now we have a great shot of being 5-0 before the break. But if we don’t wrap up on the likes of McFadden, Jackson or James we will give back the advantage we now enjoy.
I explained that in the article.
I’m not particularly concerned with this development because of the circumstances. I don’t think we give David Garrard and Fred Taylor enough credit – they were able to wiggle out of some sticky situations because they’re just really good players. It was also hot, so I’m chalking up a few of those misses to fatigue. It was ugly, but these are good football players that were missing these tackles – they’ll turn it around.
by Brian Galliford on Sep 16, 2008 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions
but there aren’t other tough players to tackle? There won’t be other times where our guys are tired? We’ve got bigger backs like Steven Jackson, Edge James, Ronnie Brown, etc coming up soon. We absolutely have to improve our tackling against guys like that….
~K
I’m not saying we don’t. I’m just saying that I think it will improve, and that they deserve the benefit of the doubt because of the heat. Do you honestly think that Perry Fewell isn’t harping on that this week?
by Brian Galliford on Sep 17, 2008 6:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Give Garrard and Taylor credit..
But, the tackling was poor. It is extremely tough to keep your legs under you in weather like that. It’s till no excuse. Both teams had to deal with it, and I don’t think I saw JAX miss as many tackles.
Tell that to the guys who couldn’t stop Fred Jackson all day.
by Brian Galliford on Sep 16, 2008 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions
One issue I saw with tackling
No one on a lot of the missed tackles were breaking down and squaring up the player. If your hoping to put guys like Garrad and Taylor on the floor, you need to keep centered and able to move side to side quickly. Most of our guys were lunging rather than moving towards the tackle which can be indicative of two things.
1- Sheer exhaustion, I’ve played and practiced in 100+ degree heat and its no fun. By the time it ends your done, and most times your hazy on where the hell you’ve been and doing, and that is with a concerned medical staff hydrating the hell out of you. I can understand that and I hope thats 90% of the missed tackled.
2- Poor preperation/cockiness, our guys were thumping the Seahawks the week prior and running through their tackles each time they hit a Seahawks player. After beating a good team and seeing how the Titans had thumped the Jags the week before, our guys may have gotten a little sloppy thinking this would be a pushover game. Once there it was proven to them that it would not be a cake walk but by then mental toughness was being sapped by the heat. This is something Fewell and his boys need to keep in check in the weeks ahead if we keep reeling off wins.
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....

by 



















