Seahawks Week: Seattle's passing attack dinged, but dangerous
Welcome to "Seahawks Week", Rumblers! In an effort to learn all that we can about the Buffalo Bills' season opening opponent, the Seattle Seahawks, we'll be joined once per day by John Morgan of Field Gulls throughout this week. John is a superbly knowledgeable blogger when it comes to the X's and O's of the game, and he'll give us some excellent perspective on the Seahawks as a team heading into Sunday's tilt. To see all posts related to Seahawks Week, click here.
Despite the lack of a consistent running game in 2007, the Seattle Seahawks - even without what can be considered a "legitimate" top-flight wide receiver - boasted one of the NFL's most consistent and diverse passing attacks. Now, however, their receiving corps is banged up, with both starters (Bobby Engram and Deion Branch) set to miss the season opener against our beloved Buffalo Bills.
In their stead, Nate Burleson and Courtney Taylor will start at receiver, catching passes from the banged up Matt Hasselbeck, who has dealt with back issues this pre-season. Should the Bills be worried? Let's hear John Morgan out before we make any decisions...
Buffalo Rumblings: What's the status on Deion Branch? How soon is he expected to be back in the lineup for good? We're aware that Nate Burleson's role increases due to Bobby Engram's injury; who fills in for Branch in the short term?
John Morgan, Field Gulls: After spending the preseason on the PUP list, Branch enters the season on the 53. Against Buffalo, he won't contribute. From there it's hard to know when he'll be ready, but one must assume sometime before Week 6. Nate Burleson's role doesn't really increase because of Bobby Engram's injury, as the two couldn't be much more different receivers within the same system. In fact, despite it being repeated into the ground, I'm not sure Burleson's role has increased at all. If it has, it will be because he has developed as a receiver. Burleson was already the starting split end for most of the 2007 season. His problem wasn't snaps. His problem was consistently running the right routes and getting open. The talent and skill set are there for Burleson to eventually break out, but I don't think Seattle is anticipating running their offense through him.
Instead, second year man out of Auburn and new starting flanker, Courtney Taylor, plus a balanced distribution between the tight ends, running backs and slot receivers should power Seattle's passing offense. That's not too far from the formula that powered 2007's ninth ranked passing offense in the NFL. But, where that unit had ciphers at starting running back and right guard, Seattle enters 2008 with not just upgrades, but strengths at both positions. While no one skill position player will ever take over a game, excellent pass blocking, plus five legitimate receiving threats on every play should again power a top ten passing offense.
***
My take? I'm not completely convinced. Matt Hasselbeck is an excellent quarterback and Mike Holmgren's offensive scheme is superb, and as John alludes to, it really takes the pressure off of one receiver to carry the load week in and week out. The fact that the Seahawks use their tight ends and running backs nearly as much as their receivers in the passing game gives them versatility and flexibility offensively, and you can bet that it will leave Buffalo's defense a bit off-balance at points on Sunday. Expect RB Maurice Morris and rookie TE John Carlson to be involved as well.
But there is a limit to what Seattle can do on Sunday, at least compared to what they normally do. A system can only take you so far, and Burleson is the only player that can be considered close to an explosive threat (he's a dynamic return man and can score just about any time he touches the ball). Seattle won't exactly dink and dunk, but they'll use their receivers as chain-movers, and they'll attack the edges of Buffalo's defense with the run, with screen passes, and with quick throws. The Bills' defense will be running around a lot on Sunday. But I still believe that if the Bills tackle well and avoid long runs after the catch, they can keep Seattle's still-potent passing attack in check.
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
Good feelings
I truly believe that our Defense outmatches their offense in alot of ways this Sunday. If the Seahawks can’t run on us effectively, then I think they are done for and will be lucky to score ten points.
Even though their D is good, I think we actually have the one up on them on both sides of the ball.
The Bills CAN win every game
by killascript on Sep 2, 2008 2:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Their D isn’t just good… it’s superb.
I like the confidence and I think the Bills most certainly have enough to beat the Seahawks, but to say we one-up on them on both sides of the ball is quite bold. Any particular reason you feel this way, or just that good old season opening feeling? :)
by Brian Galliford on Sep 2, 2008 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just think, that with the new FB, and Lynch being a top tier running back in this league, running between the tackles, right at their DTs will wear them down, and also open up the passing game where I think, the new offense will spread them all over, but stay mid-range in the passing to start. I think we will se an attack, on their attack style offense. The big strength is Seattle’s LBs and DEs, in my opinion, and I like how we neitralized the speed rusher Freeney in indianapolis in the run game and think we can do the same to Kearney, even though it is now the regular season. Fight fire with fire and we can win. I also believe that Evans is a man who can’t be stopped 1on1 and if Turk wants to impress this group of bloggers, he better free him up from the double team quick by utilizing Parrish. I think i could go on, but the Seahawks website doesn’t have a good depth chart and I can’t get one from nfl.com on the game preview between the Bills and the Hawks either.
I just think, if we game plan aggressively, it will blow up their D, and our D outweighs what remains of their offense. Their run game is week, and although the jury is still out on our run D, it better show up, and then we win.
The Bills CAN win every game
by killascript on Sep 2, 2008 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seahawks D with the starters and key backups
DE – Patrick Kerney
DT – Brandon Mebane
DT – Craig Terrill / Howard Green
DE – Daryl Tapp
LB – Julian Peterson
LB – Lofa Tatupu
LB – LeRoy Hill
CB – Marcus Trufant
CB – Kelly Jennings
SS – Brain Russell
FS – Deon Grant
That is an elite defense with pro bowl calibur players at a handful of positions. I don’t see how thier D vs. our O gives the Bills an advantage in any way.
by kaisertown on Sep 2, 2008 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
don't forget DE Lawrence Jackson
Think of the DE’s as a trio
Why? Because the Seahawks rock my socks.
by Chickadee on Sep 2, 2008 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really? I didn’t think Jackson would get too many snaps this early in the year. Will he be in for specific situations (ie: passing downs) or will he just be shuffled in for Tapp and Kerney at random? About what percentage of snaps should we expect to see him out there? I was thinking about 20%, so I didn’t bother mentioning him.
I know Mebane played well last season, but how are you expecting Terrill and Green to look? Are they going to rotate them in and out too based on situations? They seem like pretty different types of DTs so I listed them both with the thinking that they would both see considerable time.
Will Josh Wilson fill in for Babineaux in nickel situations?
by kaisertown on Sep 2, 2008 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
http://sea.scout.com/2/784180.html
pretty much sums it all up.
Watching preseason work I saw Lawrence Jackson being an impact very often. I’d say Kerney will be at leftDE 80% of the time and Tapp at rightDE about 65% of the time. That’s plenty of time for Jackson. Plus on the nickle Jackson has been slipping inside to tackle.
Babineaux isn’t a great player, but he does great things every once in a while, just clutch. But that said Josh Wilson allegedly contending for that spot was just to light a fire under babs’ ass to improve this offseason and I haven’t, admittedly, paid attention to him. Though that might be a bad sign.
Why? Because the Seahawks rock my socks.
by Chickadee on Sep 2, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't care
I think these teams match up well, but the Bills can be one up on this Seattle team. On paper it doesn’t look like it, but I see our receivers out matching their secondary, and if the Bills run right at them on attack, then we have the upper hand. I see a big day from Lee Evans, and Lynch in a Bills win.
Not sure if we’ll get a prediction post later, but i will stand by a Bills 24-10 win, at home in the opener.
The Bills CAN win every game
by killascript on Sep 2, 2008 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm glad
we get this game at the Ralph. Our Bills will need their “A” game this week to beat Seattle, and the 12th man should come in handy. This would be a good week for the Bills to get a special teams TD.
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Sep 2, 2008 2:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
More on that specific topic later this week…
by Brian Galliford on Sep 2, 2008 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
bad feelings
Week 1 already reminds me of close losses to NE, Denver, and Jax. The bottom line is if they win it will be a whole new feel to this team, if they lose, many will continue to wonder, "are these the same old Bills?
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Sep 2, 2008 5:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Probably the best thing that could happen in this game would be for Seattle’s defensive linemen to totally kick the butt of the Bill’s offensive line so that Edward’s spends the game running for his life. That might cause Brandon to rethink his stubbornness before the whole season goes down the drain.
by mikeh on Sep 2, 2008 7:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually
I would say that the best thing that could happen would be the Bills winning easy, and suffering zero injuries.
I say easy win
you say let Trent get the snot beat out of him.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Sep 2, 2008 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right, it will be better if Edwards gets the snot beaten out of him early. If the Bill’s limp along well enough so that it does not seem blatantly obvious that they need Jason Peters desperately, then they might struggle to a 6-10 season. The only way they will make the playoff is with Peters. It would be best if that lesson is learned sharply early in the season, while there is still time to recover.
by mikeh on Sep 2, 2008 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This team can win withoutr Peters. will it be harder? Absolutely. If they prove it, maybe Peters will realize that he isn’t as critcal as he thinks he is and end is hold out.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Sep 2, 2008 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boy, you’ve got a one-track mind. There comes a point when bringing up the same tired discussion over and over again is pointless; let’s talk about the game and the players involved in that game, shall we?
by Brian Galliford on Sep 2, 2008 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mikeh
I really hope you were being sarcastic…
by Scoe221 on Sep 2, 2008 9:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That was a little bit unnecessary. Sorry about that.
by mikeh on Sep 2, 2008 10:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Edwards
If he gets rid of the ball quickly, expect a win. I think Bills will pass to set up the run, and will be aggressive.
The Bills CAN win every game
by killascript on Sep 2, 2008 11:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
All opinions are appreciated
But I can stir up all my negative emotions on my own. I really could do without all the comments that read “another season of missing the playoffs” etc. I click to this site to read a blog that is insightful and exhibits class. The Buffalo Bills can make the playoffs this year without Jason P and with or without fans that cross lines. If I were trying to make a point about any player, my blog must exhibit the characteristics that exemplify my point…CHARACTER in this case.
That being said, it takes maturity to own up to our momentary lapse of reasons. So I really appreciate the apology. It makes a difference.
by the Uncommon Denominator on Sep 3, 2008 1:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bills Pass D (LB's in particular)
Well, as I see it so far, I’d say that one semi-weakness on the Bills D is pass coverage from the LB’s. If they can’t handle the TE’s, and RB’s going over the middle, screens or on slants, it could end up being a long day for our ‘D’. That being said, Youboty could play a HUGE role Sunday in the nickel package, and if he continues as he has progressed during this off-season, I could also see him w/ an INT changing the Hawks game-plan all together. Should that happen, I see a ‘W’ for our so important opener @ home.
On offense, I can see us opening up the game w/ a few short passes trying to keep their D honest providing Lynch a better chance of getting the running game going. Once that happens, I believe that Turk will eventually open up the O playbook and we will see plays called we haven’t seen in WAY too long!
Season Ticket Holder Sec: 312, Row: 15
"There's NO place like home when it's the Big Tree Inn"
by Pocono Bob on Sep 3, 2008 8:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
TE important
WE have to use Royal , in the middle. that will free up the outside, for evans. I think they have a rookie TE and that should help Youboty.
as far as Seahawk offense. their numbers are balloned, by the pitiful NFC west. when they finally got in the playoffs, they got spanked. I think this an average offensive team and they may have problems, with the wind at the ralph. Sea is 0-11 ATS in the past 11 , against the AFC east they are not a good road team.
by Bluebill on Sep 3, 2008 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















