More on Buffalo's 31-14 victory over the Rams
Yesterday, the Buffalo Bills extended their winning streak to four games by taking care of business in St. Louis in a 31-14 win over the Rams. It wasn't pretty, but it was effective, and the Bills are 4-0 for the first time since 1992. Here are some more observations on the game that I didn't post in yesterday's recap.
Offensive Line
I'm sure that Ron will have more to say about this later in the week, but I was impressed with the run blocking... in the second half. Buffalo made a tweak to their blocking schemes at the half yesterday, and the result was a solid half of rushing as the Bills put the Rams away. This is still easily the biggest area of concern for the Bills, however - the unit has been the model of inconsistency to date, looking awful at times and brilliant at others. Consider this: in nine starts last season, Trent Edwards was sacked 12 times. He's been sacked 11 times through this season's first four games. I still think our run blocking will be improve; for now, I'm much more concerned about the Bills' ability to keep that #5 Bills jersey clean, and the guy who wears it healthy.
Oh, and I'm not placing all of the blame at the feet of Jason Peters, either - Melvin Fowler and Langston Walker weren't particularly wonderful yesterday, either.
Lynch and Reed
People already know how awesome Marshawn Lynch is. He's only averaging 3.5 yards per carry on the season, but nobody outside of Buffalo realizes that he's literally doing it all by himself. I can't recall a Bills running back - or a Bills player, for that matter - that was tougher to bring down or more adept at picking up yards after contact. The guy's a stud. People only half realize it right now; when Lynch gets some blocking, he's going to have some monster games.
Not as many people are as appreciative of what Josh Reed does for the offense, however. Currently the team leader with 17 receptions, Reed is, quite simply, a first down machine. He had a few more key conversions yesterday, and is obviously Edwards' go-to-guy in clutch situations. We have ourselves a heck of a slot receiver. He's in for a career year if he keeps this up.
McGee loss could be critical
I'll probably expand on this more in the week - once things are more "official" - but the loss of Terrence McGee to a sprained left knee could end up being a critical loss to the defense. I'm hearing that McGee's injury could require 3-4 weeks of rest, and the Bills will probably give it to him - just as they encouraged Roscoe Parrish to have thumb surgery. McGee has been Buffalo's best defensive back, and the Bills are about to enter a two-game stretch in which they'll take on a powerful Cardinals aerial attack and a ridiculously effective Chargers offense. There's going to be a lot of pressure on Ashton Youboty and Leodis McKelvin to play well in McGee's absence if it turns out that his knee will keep him out for multiple games.
Defense close to exploding
There's no doubt that Buffalo's defense has been the one constant in their four victories. They struggled in the first half yesterday, but dominated in the second half as the Bills finally got over the hump and coasted to a win.
Where they've been (slightly) lacking, however, is playmaking. They finally got a big one when Jabari Greer won the game with his 33-yard pick-six. Donte Whitner also had a nice sack, and the defense in general was in St. Louis' face for the entirety of the second half. Through four games, the Bills have registered 10 sacks and forced 5 turnovers. That's not bad production at all, but does anyone else feel like they're thisclose to much more? The unit seems to be on the verge of having a game where they force a bunch of turnovers and make a lot of big hits. Think they won't relish the chance to face the suddenly turnover-happy Kurt Warner? Think again.
The AFC East
You have to love the position the Bills are in within their division. We're 4-0, and we have a game and a half on the Pats, two games on the Jets and two and a half on the Dolphins. To say that the Bills are in the driver's seat is an understatement. Each of our three foes has played at least one divisional game, and the best part of it is that all three of them have at least one division loss already (the Jets lost to the Pats; the Pats lost to the Dolphins; the Dolphins lost to the Jets). Good stuff - but that three-week stretch of divisional games loom as the largest yet for these Bills.
Film Review
I'll be doing my usual film review as always this week; however, I'll be detained at work a little longer than usual on Monday, so please don't be surprised/upset if you have to wait a little longer than usual for analysis on one of the units. I'll try my best to get through it all tonight, however (at least, I will right up until 9PM - any more 'Heroes' fans out there?).
0 recs |
39 comments
|
Comments
Hey Brian nice write up...........
One thing that I think (noticed and even said should happen during the game thread yesterday) was that the Bills needed to stop trying to “pound it up the middle” and start hitting stuff off tackle….and in the second half they did just that and were able to pick up chunks of yardage. Even on the Jackson TD run which was like a “stretch” play….it wasnt a straight run up the gut…….they got the DL moving down the line which in turn opened up cutback lanes…….granted it could have been a blocking adjustment (like you stated) however I think it was more of the fact that the Ends for the Rams arent as good going side to side as they were going straight ahead………………All one really needs to do is look at the yards per carry for Jackson vs Lynch…….and its apparent that running the ball up the middle just isnt working for this team………..
Im sure Turk and Co. realize this and will make the proper adjustments……
(Ah arm-chair coordinating is so darn fun lol)
Miss you Kotch......Love you Trent
by norcaliangelsfan on Sep 29, 2008 11:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Much of the success we had on the ground in the second half was due to a change-up in blocking schemes, which ties in with precisely what you mention here.
by Brian Galliford on Sep 29, 2008 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
can you expand on/explain this?
what exactly were these changes?
and in general, why don’t teams make big changes during the first or second halves? do they, and people just pick up on them? do analysts sometimes see a difference in production between halves and blindly attribute it to half time changes?
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Sep 29, 2008 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought that Turk Schonert got a bit impatient in the first half. People forget he’s still a rookie offensive coordinator… dude will make mistakes. He calmed down in the second half, and the offense played better.
Will have more specifics on the blocking adjustments in (hopefully) tomorrow’s film review.
by Brian Galliford on Sep 29, 2008 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spock/Sylar is a bad@$$
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Sep 29, 2008 12:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd Marry Claire Bennett........
she’s a sweet little cookie…………..i’d like to take a bite out of her………
um….wait……..is that fit for children to read?
Miss you Kotch......Love you Trent
by norcaliangelsfan on Sep 29, 2008 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn’t she technically a child?
by Brian Galliford on Sep 29, 2008 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In Texas age of consent is 17.............
thats where “shes” from……..and I imagine shes about that old……….Not sure what her age is plus………she’s well within my age limit if you use the “half your age plus 7” rule.
Miss you Kotch......Love you Trent
by norcaliangelsfan on Sep 29, 2008 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and plus........
doesnt she move to california by herself? Why would a “child” get to do that?
Not that any of this really matters…..lol
Miss you Kotch......Love you Trent
by norcaliangelsfan on Sep 29, 2008 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
the real “Claire” is 23 years old. She’s also dating her uncle (On the show, Peter (Milo) plays her uncle but she’s dating him in real life, and he’s 31) sounds like an episode of Springer.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Sep 29, 2008 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
She actually just turned 19… Wikipedia knows things.
by Brian Galliford on Sep 29, 2008 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thought I read somewhere that she was 23…Oh well, does it really matter?
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Sep 29, 2008 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
besides
this Heroes cast member is MUCH hotter IMHO.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Sep 29, 2008 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not that happy with last season...
…but I’ll blame it on the writer’s strike, or global warming, or Canada. Anything but the show, really.
The premiere was amazing, though, and this season I’m right back into it again. Looking forward to tonight.
On a side note, if you like nerdy type comedy (admittedly cheesy comedy), the show Chuck on right before it is pretty decent. Lots of James Bond spoofs. I know it looks bad, but I gave it a chance and liked it and it was good enough for NBC to bring back for a second season.
by nickfeely8 on Sep 29, 2008 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t mind it. But I’d rather re-watch Bills games while Chuck is on, especially with the way this season has gone. :)
by Brian Galliford on Sep 29, 2008 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you catch the Middle Man on ABC Family earlier this summer?
That was a great show that had good writing, good acting, and was funny as anything else on TV this year. Sadly, its on such a backwater channel and time Mon at 9 this summer, my wife and I were probably the only people watching it.
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on Sep 29, 2008 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Definitely didn’t see it. Spent my time re-watching Heroes on DVD… :-P
by Brian Galliford on Sep 29, 2008 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sylar
I was excited at this, because I was hoping I’d missed Brian commenting on something that’s driven me nuts since last year…Trent Edwards is a dead ringer for Sylar. When he hasn’t shaved for a few days before the game, the two look like they could be twins separated at birth.
There, I finally said it. I’m only halfway through season 2 in my catchup efforts, so if he’s changed appearances in the meantime, I apologize. I just need someone to validate that I’m not crazy here.
by Future Considerations on Sep 29, 2008 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm, not sure about that. Trent Edwards’ smile is a whole lot less “I’m going to kill you and eat your brain” than Sylar’s. Man, is he creepy.
(for people who haven’t seen a picture of him): http://www.imdb.com/media/rm4194605824/nm0704270
Similar pose for Edwards: http://assets.buffalobills.com/team/player.jsp?player_id=122719
What about JP vs. Peter Petrelli? Helps if they’re both grimacing in pain. And, of course, not the Terrorist Bear beard.
by Krenn on Sep 29, 2008 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Edwards and Sylar? Not seeing it, except for the general badass-ness.
by Brian Galliford on Sep 29, 2008 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Despite the struggles of the O-line
the Bills continue to put points up on the scoreboard – simply amazing when you stop to think about it. Hey, offense, any chance you could score some more before the 4th quarter? I’ve already chewed my fingernails down to the quick, and it’s only 4 games into the regular season!
Superfan82, where are you? Your main man is a chain mover for this team. Give him some props!
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Sep 29, 2008 12:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
O Line
All I know is that this is the NFL. Teams are good at developing game plans and producing looks that the opponent is not ready for. Sure, you would love to come out firing, and some weeks we will as the our Offensive game plan throws a curveball at the opponent’s defensive scheme. But I think people are missing the point here. Good teams, can adjust, can wait it out and know that with time they will find a way to beat their opponent. I.E. the Chargers vs. Oakland yesterday. So everyone giving us grief for beating Oakland at the gun can shove it, cuz they game planned great for the Chargers and gave them the same trouble.
There are numerous areas to improve. But the O-L was just outschemed in the 1st half yesterday. They weren’t prepared for it. But give credit to Turk and the Offensive staff generating a 2nd half game plan to take advantage of the Rams scheme.
And the most impressive thing: Trent Edwards got absolutely lit up physically yesterday and always got up fast and showed again how impressive his leadership skills are. This kid gives us a chance every week and that is why we are 4-0 and winning these comeback games.
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Sep 29, 2008 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree the coaches were outschemed on the O-line
You can see it in the Chris Long sack where he beat Peters to the inside. The RB (Lynch, I think) was going to chip Long on his way out the backfield, then tried to lunge back too late when Long cleanly stepped inside Peters. It’s like the coaches thought all Long could do was speed rush outside.
I do like the fact that the Bills coaches are obviously making good halftime adjustments. Seems like they are getting beat in the initial preparation, though. Maybe because Schonert is a young OC? Well, I’d rather have a team having good second halfs than good first halfs and the 4-0 record is golden.
Re: Trent Edwards: Being a former baseball player myself (more a game of speed, skill and finesse than contact), I can’t tell you how much it impresses me that Edwards can just lay in the pocket, knowing he’s about to get creamed, and put the ball on the money most of the time. That just doesn’t seem like a skill you can learn (see Losman, J.P.). Either you have it or you don’t. Sort of like a third baseman or shortstop: you can either field those short hops without flinching or you can’t.
by thefourwinds on Sep 29, 2008 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if peters
knows the play and knows lynch is going to “chip” on the outside than even more shame on him for letting long go inside him.
fielding a short hop or taking a hit from leonard litle….nice comparison…right.
by jimkutica on Sep 29, 2008 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm...
hard to tell on the web if you agreed with my comparison or if you were being sarcastic. If it indeed was sarcasm, I suppose a better way of explaining how impressed I am with Edwards is that the only contact I ever experienced in baseball was a few full-speed outfield collisions (I played CF and LF). They were brutal collisions that left me woozy. But the whole thing that made them so bad was we didn’t know they were coming. What’s so impressive is the QB knows those hits are coming (except those from the blind side), and either seems to have the knack for staying in there (and delivering the big play) or doesn’t have that knack (and therefore bails out on the play). I was comparing that knack to the only thing in sports I have experience with: I was an outfielder since the time I was 7 years old, because I had OF skills, not infield skills (I just couldn’t field the hot ground ball without flinching).
by thefourwinds on Sep 29, 2008 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s too bad Lynch hasn’t gotten better blocking, because people would be taking notice then. The kid just does a great job picking up yards that aren’t there and WOW, what a couple of beautiful jukes on the play before the Evans’ TD! I’d say Marion Barber, Lynch and probably Steven Jackson are the top 3 at getting yards that aren’t there in the league, and it’s probably not even close after those first 2…
I don’t know about anyone else, but not having McGee for up to a month is a HUGE problem. Cross your fingers that Boldin has to sit out this week, but Fitzgerald is the type of player that will eat Greer alive because of his size and strength. Youboty should see Fitz a lot this week, so we’ll see what the kid can do. I’m definitely not comfortable with McKelvin on the field, that’s for sure. We’ll probably get our first look at Reggie Corner too, so that kid better be ready to go as well…
Josh Reed just continues to step up and I couldn’t be happier. People have been giving that guy crap for years now, but his role is always overlooked. He’s not a big play threat, he’s not a red zone guy, but he’s the guy an offense NEEDS to be successful. It’s great having a guy who can catch a 5 yard pass and fight his way for a first down. With a young, improving QB, that’s so important.
I don’t feel the same way regarding the D’s playmaking. I don’t see it. We really don’t have any playmakers on this D, and to me, they haven’t been very close to many turnovers thus far. I’d be more confident expecting a spike in turnovers if the D had been close to getting them thus far. They’ve taken advantage when it’s been there, but it’s been few and far between thus far. We have Captain Turnover this week, so it’s imperative to get after him. Warner is effected by pressure like no other above average QB in the league. If we can hit him early and get him rushing his passes/decisions, he WILL turn it over. We just have to force it out of him. We still have to find a way to generate some more consistent pressure….
~K
by Kurupt on Sep 29, 2008 12:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed on the pressure and causing turnover part........
100% spot on with Josh Reed…..he’s the man….
I think part of the problem with Lynch is play selection when he get the running opportunity…..seems like he’s the one who gets stuck trying to run up the middle….while Jackson is given the plays which seem to give him a chance in space…….but without watching tons of film…….I can really prove/disprove this.
Miss you Kotch......Love you Trent
by norcaliangelsfan on Sep 29, 2008 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Defense - WHERE IS AARON SCHOBEL?
This guy has done nothing. He lacks the speed he once had and has always lacked the pure strength to overpower anyone. I’m starting to really wonder what the hell we were thinking giving him $50 million! I mean I watch him every week and he realy has no chance of beating those LT’s. And the chances he has had he can’t WRAP UP the QB. I do think we need to elevate Ellis to take plays from Schobel on passing situations and leave Schobel fresher.
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Sep 29, 2008 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
5 solo tackles yesterday, 2 QB pressures, almost a forced fumble
Leading the line in tackles. All playing against Orlando Pace yesterday, who is also forced into a holding penalty.
by twoeightnine on Sep 29, 2008 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reed is now playing the right spot for him
Reed is a good player in the slot, we’ve been playing him incorrectly for too long as outside receiver, he is not built nor skilled enough for those areas. He is made and meant to play the middle of the field in the short to medium length pass routes while Evans and Hardy take up DBs to the outside and deep downfield. Now that we have a guy (Hardy) that makes team take notice on the outside, Reed has been getting open and getting alot of room to operate. Glad to see it happening because without Roscoe, were gonna need him even more.
McGee being gone more than 2-3 games means we could be in deep trouble. I just don’t think McKelvin will hold up the whole season if we need to lean on him heavily. Lets be honest here, Youbuty is a phenomenal Nickel back, kid can blitz, cover and make the tough tackle. He is a good #2, but Greer is better in that role, but McGee IS our #1 CB for a reason and thats because he can do it all, and I don’t think Greer will be able to keep up his stellar play against teams #1 WRs for more than a few weeks, sooner or later without McGee we will start to suffer. Get well soon McGee, we need ya buddy!
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on Sep 29, 2008 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is probably the worst stretch of the season to have McGee out. With Arizona and San Diego, and their excellent passing games, it’ll be tough for our young guys. I wish McKelvin had more experience before needing to play a lot, so we’re going to have to hope for the best out of him. Reggie Corner may also need to get out there too….
~K
by Kurupt on Sep 29, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Different Test for D This Week and I'm Not As Optimistic As Brian ...
We’ve had three weeks in a row where the strength of the opponent is the running game. I expect Arizona to throw the ball 40 times this week and try to go up tempo. I’m not sure our guys will get to Warner enough if he gets into a good quick groove. I think the offense will have to score to keep up. Should be fun.
by MrFurious1 on Sep 29, 2008 1:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Stroud, Williams, and Co.
Our DT’s need to help collapse the pocket on Warner to force him out of his comfort zone (and hopefully into mistakes). I agree, it will be a different test, but one our Bills D is perfectly capable of passing. (oops, that was a bad pun!) Fewell will probably need to provide a bunch of different defensive looks to keep Warner guessing.
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Sep 29, 2008 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
marshawn
definatley needs to get some of those carries on the edges like action jackson is getting. beast mode is getting some good chuncks up the gut. just imagine the possibilities when he breaks out on the edges to go one on one with a DB. i’m not much of a betting man but i like #23 right there. the moves he put on during his long run that got called back were absolutley ridiculous. so lets get them guys up front moving some bodies( after all we do have the biggest line in football) and marshawn can legally change his name to beast mode. GO BILLS. BRING ON THE CARDS!!!!!
by BillsFan119 on Sep 29, 2008 1:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I
was one of the ones who wanted Josh Reeds head on a stick a couple of years ago and couldn’t understand why we re-signed him the last time, he was always dropping passes couldn’t run after the catch—jump forward to 2008 and this is a totally differant player and has been said multipal times it takes time to develop a wide out, point being that with Hardy we may be in for a long wait for him to contribute to this offence. I now have a lot of confidence in Reed to make the catch and move the chains. Boy was I wrong about him!!!
Bills Fan in PA
by BILLS on Sep 29, 2008 5:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















