Bills place LB Crowell on IR
The Buffalo Bills have announced that they have placed linebacker Angelo Crowell on Injured Reserve. The move ends the season club's leading tackler from the 2007 season. Keith Ellison is expected to assume Crowell's starting strong side linebacker position; look for the Bills to make a move for a linebacker on the active roster, as the team currently only has five.
Ineresting tidbit:
"Crowell’s decision to have surgery this close the start of the season likely did not sit well with the Bills coaching staff, and their decision to put him on injured reserve, in what is a contract year for the linebacker, likely does not sit well with him.
Crowell will be an unrestricted free agent at the end of the 2008 season, but he’ll be unable to have an effect on his market value with his play on the field this season."
I wonder what this means for Crowell's future with the team... Think there'll be some bad blood?
Editor's Comments, by Brian Galliford: Props to BuffCrunch for breaking the news here. 17 players on IR in 2007, and before a single game is played, we're already at 2 in 2008. This one is fishy though... like, Jason Peters fishy.
I think it's pretty clear at this point that Crowell's brief appearance in the pre-season win over Indy was his final appearance in a Bills uniform. We've been hearing since before the end of the 2007 season that the Bills, while they like Crowell, aren't so enamored with him that they'll break the bank for him. Now the bridges between Crowell and the Bills organization may be ablaze. I don't think it was likely he was a Bill after '09 before this incident; I think he's a goner for sure now.
If I'm Buffalo - and clearly I'm not, because they're simply plugging and chugging with Keith Ellison - I'm sliding Kawika Mitchell over to strong side and starting John DiGiorgio (Buffalo's second-leading tackler in '07) on the weak side. Alas, that won't happen for now; Ellison starts on the strong side, Mitchell stays on the weak side, and we pray to the NFL gods that Ellison learns how to play well.
When did it become such a headache to be a Bills fan? So much promise has turned into so much distraction, and we haven't even taken the field yet... I'm disgusted. Something has to go right at some point.
This FanPost written by a registered user of Buffalo Rumblings.
Read Related
Comments
it means
they didn’t want to resign him regardless. In fact, Crowell will probably file a grievance and try to get an injury settlement for his release, assuming the injury is what it’s reported as.
It’s just a spiteful, stupid move by the team to put him on IR if it’s true that it would have only taken him 2-4 weeks to recover. If they were trying to send a message to him for having the surgery now, then fine him or suspend, don’t hurt the whole D by taking him out for the season. Just idiotic if that’s the case….
~K
by Kurupt on Sep 4, 2008 6:16 PM EDT 0 recs
what the hell in going on in Orchard Park?????????
http://bills.sportsbloggingnetwork.com/
by norcaliangelsfan on
Sep 4, 2008 6:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
is*
http://bills.sportsbloggingnetwork.com/
by norcaliangelsfan on
Sep 4, 2008 6:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I think....
the Bills are getting irritated with player shinanigans. The way Chris Brown reported the story, he made it sound as if the Bills didn’t know he had the surgery until it was over. It just isn’t a good thing when the HEAD COACH is SURPRISED that one of his players decides to get surgery. It’s not a team move by Crowell, and placing him on IR is a team move by the team itself. It’s not a good thing from a fan perspective, but if I was coaching a team on any level I wouldn’t want that type of selfishness on my roster. Why do you think Peters has not been ushered back in here by the front office? This coaching staff just doesn’t care which players show up as long as the players that show up are team/character guys.
We also have to remember that the front office and coaching staff know the situation a bit more intimately than we do.
"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."
by ForeignArrow on Sep 4, 2008 6:39 PM EDT 0 recs
this is very very true............
and a darn good point…..kudos
http://bills.sportsbloggingnetwork.com/
by norcaliangelsfan on
Sep 4, 2008 6:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
My exact sentiments Kurupt
ForeignArrow, I understand where you are coming from as well, but, you have to look at it like this. There is no way that the team doesn’t have any contact with it’s players. That in my opinion is pretty much a lie. Teams know what is going on with their players. Whether it be directly from the player or the agent, that doesnt mean they cant find out from a person “close” to the player. Everyone spills the beans on pro players.
Secondly – I very much agree with Kurupts comments. This is just ludicrous to put someone on IR that will only be out 2-4 weeks. There is no way the team didn’t know either. This type of thing has to be cleared through the team doctors for insurance purposes as well. They knew what was going on. This just makes me think that the front office no longer has any idea of what they are doing. Where is Marvelous Marv when you need him?
by Hambone on Sep 4, 2008 6:53 PM EDT 0 recs
Is it me
or (with what has happened with Peters and now Crowell) are the Bills intentionally trying to run a very promising season into the ground?
by NJBillsfan on Sep 4, 2008 6:55 PM EDT 0 recs
Hope not
but it seems that way with a quick glance….
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 4, 2008 7:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
LB
Hopefully there is someone on the Free Ageny List that we can pick up to replace him. I’ve said this all of last season and I’ll say it again now that issue has risen…ELLISON AND DIGIORGIO ARE WORTHLESS WHEN IT COMES TO THE STARTING LINE UP!!! They are the exact type of line backers that this coaching staff has moved away from to try and bolster our defense…small and speedy! They’re ok in open space but get eaten up by blockers. If Ellison replaces Crowell for the entire season our defense is at a LARGE disadvantage. Get your draft boards ready folks because if Crowell is gone at the end of this year hopefully we can replace him with James Laurinaitis! I know that is way too far in advance to look but we need a beast to replace a beast and he’s #1 in my book of this years draft class. I don’t like to bash players on my favorite team but Ellison and DiGiorgio deserve it because they’re terrible!
by Teaters33 on Sep 4, 2008 7:11 PM EDT 0 recs
Forced into a corner
Crowell put the Bills in a horrible position. If he really didn’t tell the team he was going to have surgery and then didn’t tell them he was having it until it was over then he had to expect the organization to respond in an uncharitable manner. He, and we, can’t expect the team to simply let him piss in their collective face. I’m not sure I see the logic of fining him (as was suggested) or even the legality of it. His doctor obviously thought he needed the surgery so that’s not the issue. His handling of the surgery is the issue. The knee has been bugging him for a while so he could have had the surgery and been back in time for the season opener.
Crowell knew the team was counting on him to be a starter. The team kept 6 LBs on the roster and it is now down to 5. The team really can’t afford to go with just 5 LBs (3 starters—1 of whom plays special teams, and 2 back ups who both play special teams) so the Bills have to add another LB. The only other option is to cut another position and add a LB until Crowell gets back. The team didn’t like door #2, which would have cost them one of the developmental players (like Bell) they are hoping to turn into future starters. Instead, they chose to drop Crowell onto the IR list and add a 6th LB ASAP. Crowell can whine but he can’t seriously think he’d win a grievance. Jauron can simply point to the numbers and say that the spot was needed for a LB who could contribute before October. He can point back to last season when the team put Poz on IR, even though he could have been back around week 11 or so.
This leaves a bad taste but I see it as being largely Crowell’s fault if what is being reported is accurate. We may find out new and relevant facts that change that impression. For example, perhaps Crowell and/or his doctor talked to Buffalo’s doctors weeks ago and were rebuffed.
In any case, Crowell is done as a Bill. From what many have written about him, I’m a little surprised to see the reaction here. (I suspect it’s mainly due to Ellison getting playing time.) The team wasn’t gung-ho about getting him re-signed so that may have been an indication that they were going to let him go anyway. It also means there’s one less vet for the Bills to re-sign. Now perhaps Evans’ deal can finally be done. Maybe, just maybe, Peters will see the millions Evans is awash in and finally shuffle off to Buffalo.
by Ron From NM on Sep 4, 2008 7:38 PM EDT 0 recs
And I was called a conspiracy theorist for stating the exact same thing Ron
And here we go, you said exactly what I have been thinking. If Crowell did this to try and prove to the Bills he should be paid like a star then it just back fired horribly. I think the market for him won’t be as hot as some people think. Yes he is a good tackler, but he is very poor in coverage and does struggle to diagnose play action quite often.
Hes done, and we now MUST move on, and find out who can step up and be a starter for the next 16 weeks.
Fear the mighty helmet wearing gopher, he is coming for your soul....
by WABillsfan on
Sep 4, 2008 7:46 PM EDT
up
0 recs
but it still makes no sense
Why PRACTICE yesterday if you were planning on having knee surgery? Why have surgery now and take games off of your season instead of having it done earlier and playing at full strength for the entire year? It’s not like he’s only auditioning for the Bills here.
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 4, 2008 7:55 PM EDT
up
0 recs
duh
why do you think the bills were pissed off enough to put him on IR, because it doesnt make sense.
"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."
by ForeignArrow on
Sep 4, 2008 9:57 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Where did Ron say anything about Crowell angling for a new contract?
If Crowell did this to try and prove to the Bills he should be paid like a star then it just back fired horribly
In what scenario does Crowell having knee surgery during the season make him more money?
by kaisertown on
Sep 5, 2008 8:28 AM EDT
up
0 recs
To show the Bills that he is a better option than DiGi/Ellison/Corto for this defense.
by the Skycap on
Sep 5, 2008 9:14 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Still doesn't make sense
What if Ellison or DiGi proved just as capable as Crowell ever was? That’d be a dumb move on his part. By sitting out games, he could lose his starting job completely. Then where does he make money?
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 5, 2008 9:16 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Kurupt, read the posts. The majority of the posters on here thinks that Crowell is a major upgrade to the others and if the Bills thought that they were as capable as Crowell he wouldn’t have been in the starting lineup. They could have then traded/cut him to save some money.
by the Skycap on
Sep 5, 2008 9:29 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Crowell has started 41 games for the Buffalo Bills. Ellison has started 16 games. The coaches have watched these guys in practice and have gone through film sessions with them for a couple of years now. If they don’t already know the difference between the two guys than they never will. Again, what would the benefit be to Crowell other than telling the organization something they already know?
by kaisertown on
Sep 5, 2008 9:38 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Another analogy
The same idiotic reason Jason Peters is not here. Peters think the Bills will come calling banking on the fact that the other linemen aren’t as good as him. Kaisertown, if you were going on a date with a hot woman would you take her to Sizzler or Ruth Chris?
by the Skycap on
Sep 5, 2008 9:47 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Peters is different. So different that I don’t see what we can learn by comparing their situations.
Peters is holding out. His leverage is that he won’t play until he gets a new contract.
Crowell is having surgery. He doesn’t have leverage because the Bills would have just put him right back into the starting lineup when he was healed up. Which would leave Crowell exactly where he is now.
if you were going on a date with a hot woman would you take her to Sizzler or Ruth Chris?
Seriously, it would depend on the woman. And I’m starting to feel stupid because i still don’t get your point. What is the Spears/sizzler analogy all about?
by kaisertown on
Sep 5, 2008 10:47 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Yes
we all think he’s better than Ellison, but apparently the staff isn’t that high on him. What if Ellison or DiGi were playing well enough when Crowell got healthy that it’d be hard to take them out of the lineup? It’s no guarantee that either hasn’t improved, so it’s no guarantee Crowell would get that starting spot back. I’m sure Bledsoe didn’t think he’d lose his job to Brady after signing the monster deal the year before….
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 5, 2008 9:50 AM EDT
up
0 recs
a few things
First, as of Chris Brown’s last report, Crowell hadn’t even had the knee scoped yet, so he had just elected to have it done thus far. It’s not like he went out and had surgery. He decided to get it done and the team knows that it’s being done.
Also, according to this Fox Sports article, the team obviously knew about it:
The decision was made after Crowell consulted with team doctors Thursday, a day after he practiced with the team.
If true, not sure how that’s pissing in the team’s face.
So, to me, this sounds like something that Crowell didn’t want to continue having pain with after practice yesterday. Just because he elected to have the surgery now, doesn’t mean he didn’t consider it before. I’m guessing he was trying to give it a go as long as possible, but ended up not feeling close enough to 100% at this time.
Yeah, this is definitely unexpected after he practiced fully yesterday, but it really doesn’t sound like he went behind the team’s back and already had a procedure done. Maybe they suggested he have it done earlier, but he said no, so they are just ticked he waited so long. That makes sense and I could see them upset, but to simply throw him on IR if they indeed are upset doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.
At this point, I’m finding it hard to entirely blame Crowell. It’s a 2-4 week recovery if it’s only a scope, and it sure sounds like he went through the team first. Why they wouldn’t just cut Bryan or put Murphy on IR if they needed another LB is beyond me. I think Crowell would have a great shot to win a grievance, and maybe rightfully so.
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 4, 2008 7:53 PM EDT
up
0 recs
?????
can you technically put a guy on IR if he’s not injured? (if he hasn’t had the surgery then he’s not really injured… not with a season-ending injury).
"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."
by ForeignArrow on
Sep 4, 2008 9:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs
i completely
agree with your assessment here and think that is exactly what happened. He said he could play through it and then today said nope I can’t. And the Bills consequenctly said “screw you”
MARVelous
by MARVelous on
Sep 5, 2008 2:24 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Yeah I totally agree too.
I can’t see how the blame lies on Crowell more than the team. It would have been pretty easy to cut Bryan or IR Murphy instead. And teams only keep 5 LBs active on gamedays sometimes, so I don’t see how that is such a hindrance to the coaching staff. When we tried to guess which 8 guys would be inactive on Sunday, Corto was my last guess. who knows if he was even going to be active in the first place. And if the Bills sign someone who wasn’t in camp, it would take them 2-4 weeks to pick up the defense anyways. So what the Bills are saying is a full season from Spragan is more valuable than 12 weeks of Crowell? That is ridiculous.
by kaisertown on
Sep 5, 2008 8:19 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I’m a fair guy. I blame Crowell and the Bills equally.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 5, 2008 8:45 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Britney Spears is a beautiful girl, but would you make her your wife?
by the Skycap on
Sep 5, 2008 9:16 AM EDT
up
0 recs
OK, why did San Fran and the Eagles trade T.O.? They didn’t have a WR comparable. Maybe they feel like none of Crowell is better than some of him.
by the Skycap on
Sep 5, 2008 9:51 AM EDT
up
0 recs
So your comparing Crowell to Two. That guys is a wack job. He has the emotional range of a 9 year old and his situation is nothing like Crowell.
Even if the Bills put Crowell on IR out of spite, that doesn’t mean that Crowell intentionally held off on the surgery with a date already planned out to “show” the Bills that they have to give him a new contract. It still makes no sense to me.
by kaisertown on
Sep 5, 2008 10:42 AM EDT
up
0 recs
He acted the way he did because he was seeking a new contract. That is where I am coming from with the comparison. Unless you psychoanalyzed Crowell, he may be a wack job too.
by the Skycap on
Sep 5, 2008 2:22 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Here, Here
This, to me, seems so calculated on Crowell’s part. What better way to prove his worth and garner at least conversation for an extension. Sit out a couple of weeksand show the Bills how much of an upgrade he is to Ellison. I mean, he went through OTA’s and training camp and not once did we hear about his knee. You have to be Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles to not see this as staged or very gullible.
by the Skycap on Sep 4, 2008 7:58 PM EDT 0 recs
Yeah
but how many times do guys intentionally miss games and have surgery just to make themselves look better? Play and prove yourself. I can’t see a guy like Crowell do this after playing hurt all of last season. Maybe, but I find it hard to believe.
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 4, 2008 8:01 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You are overlooking so many explanations that are far more likely. For example:
Crowell is tired of playing with consistent pain during practice. He is tired of having to ice the knee to avoid additional swelling and pain every time he goes home from practice. He is tired of having to show up early and meet with the team doctors before practice everyday. He wasn’t planning on having the surgery, but the pain and the extra annoyances of being injured finally caught up to him.
The team doctors told him the injury would improve with treatment and rest and he wouldn’t need the surgery, but they were wrong.
He did something during the wednesday practice to make the injury a little worse.
The injury has been gradually getting worse and the swelling and pain have gone up slowly over time to the point where surgery seemed like the smartest thing. He maybe thought that a healthy Angelo Crowell for 12+ games (including potential playoff games) would be a better thing for the team than an injured Angelo Crowell who plays with a little more pain every week and might eventually need surgery at a more important point of the season anyways.
What better way to prove his worth and garner at least conversation for an extension
By playing well.
Sit out a couple of weeks and show the Bills how much of an upgrade he is to Ellison
Both players started the entire year last season. The Bills and everybody else already know the gap in ability between the two.
I mean, he went through OTA’s and training camp and not once did we hear about his knee
That just isn’t true. Crowell has been sporadically missing practices dating back to OTAs. He barely played in the preseason (did he play at all?) and his knee has been a lingering concern on this site for over a month. Most of us (myself included) wrote it off as no big deal, but here is a quote from labill from August 15th:
Angelo Crowell
I ask this every week, but do we need to be worried about his injury? It seems that his injury has not "worsened", but it is troubling that he barely practices and plays, even though the problem seems not major and he has been in recovery mode for a long time.
You have to be Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles to not see this as staged or very gullible.
I am going to go in the opposite direction and say that you have to be Mel Gibson in the movie Conspiracy theory to see this as staged. May I ask how many copies of catcher in the rye do you own? and did I really just take an average movie from 1997 and go that far with a reference to it?
by kaisertown on
Sep 5, 2008 8:58 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Boy turns into man
This is where Keith Ellison has to elevate his game. Whitner, Edwards and gang are trying to bring a winning mentality back to OBD, just listen to their interviews. They will be counting on him to leave it on the field every game. If he can’t, give Roosevelt Colvin a call. He’s probably not the dominating pass rusher he once was, but he is better than Donnie Spragan and could probably be comparable to Crowell on this defense.
by the Skycap on Sep 4, 2008 8:06 PM EDT 0 recs
Good job taking Ellis
As if I needed another reason to be pissed that the Bills passed on Dan Connor in the 3rd round!
by Wadhams on Sep 4, 2008 8:08 PM EDT 0 recs
Strangely, I’m more comfortable with Ellison than I would have been with Connor.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 4, 2008 8:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
What’s your reasoning behind that? Connor was projected by some as a first rounder and is currently the leading tackler at Linebacker U.
by Harris on
Sep 4, 2008 8:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
projected?
He was a 3rd rounder for a reason….Don’t know much about him, but if he was a first rounder, he would have been picked as such….
And we needed Ellis more than a LB who might be starting. It’s not like Crowell was on IR back in April
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 4, 2008 8:18 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I agree with you completely…. but I can pretty much guarantee that Connor is a better football player than Ellison. Nobody on this website should be comfortable with Ellison starting.
by Harris on
Sep 5, 2008 12:45 AM EDT
up
0 recs
That's a pretty big guarantee for a guy who hasn't played a regular season NFL game.
Especially for a guy who is who is expected to be inactive Sunday. He’s third on the depth chart behind a guy with 41 career tackles in 3 years.
by twoeightnine on
Sep 5, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I think Ellison is stronger in coverage than Crowell is. That’s where our linebackers have been weakest. I think Mitchell is better than Crowell. Compared with last year’s LB corps – effectively, Poz for DiGi and Mitchell for Crowell – I still think we’re better at the position.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 4, 2008 8:45 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Please OBD, Please Pay Lee Evans before Sunday
If you are watching the Giants game and see what Plaxico Burress is doing, I beg the Bills to give Lee Evans the money. He is putting on a clinic in the first half. Besides, as I posted in a fanpost he is the classiest, most professional athlete I’ve come across in a long time and if it has the same effect on him as Plax it will be worth every cent.
by the Skycap on Sep 4, 2008 8:16 PM EDT 0 recs
Well Brian
a lot of ills can be cured with a nice win Sunday…
I’m guessing we sign someone like Blake Costanzo, who will do nothing more than play on ST’s, unfortunately. We need to bring in someone capable of playing defensively.
I would play DiGi too. I’m so sick of watching Ellison play. We may see Julius Jones running wild on Sunday if he doesn’t play better. EEEEKKKK
~K
by Kurupt on Sep 4, 2008 8:30 PM EDT 0 recs
I would disagree with this slightly. I think our concern needs to be special teams for the moment, because Ellison’s loss on special teams will be felt.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 4, 2008 8:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
maybe, but I’d rather have someone who can play OVER Ellison on D. Putting DiGi in there also would help that…
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 4, 2008 8:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Don’t forget that DiGiorgio’s ribs are currently beat up.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 4, 2008 8:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Well he's been a full go in practice
so they can’t be too bad
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 4, 2008 8:52 PM EDT
up
0 recs
They’re playable, sure, but ribs aren’t magically 100% because he’s practicing. He’s got to be really sore.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 4, 2008 8:54 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I dunno about you guys...
…but did anyone else think that something might have been up when Crowell was stripped of his captaincy? If a player still has his starting job, I would think it might be a little unusual to see it happen. We sort of expected JP to lose his since he lost the starting job but I think Crowell losing his while still securely having the starting job should have sent up some red flags.
"I could have conquered Europe, all of it, but I had women in my life." - King Henry II of England
by Calvert on Sep 4, 2008 8:32 PM EDT 0 recs
Nah… I think his loss of captaincy had more to do with Whitner.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 4, 2008 8:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
he wasn’t stripped of it. The players voted on their captains….
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 4, 2008 8:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
If this season goes down the toilet...
James Lauranitis watch!
by NJBillsfan on Sep 4, 2008 8:36 PM EDT 0 recs
Rather have the kid from USC. He’s the real deal.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 4, 2008 8:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Which one?
Cushing or Magula?
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on
Sep 4, 2008 8:44 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I was referring to Rey Maualuga, but either one is good for me. Both have great size.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 4, 2008 8:46 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I think Cushing is much quicker
correct anyone? I like that although Maualuga is a monster, but seems a bit slower…
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 4, 2008 8:53 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Maualuga
Boy I butchered the hell out of his name didn’t I?
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on
Sep 4, 2008 9:03 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Laurinaitis, Maualuga and Cushing should all be first round guys and would be great picks. Cushing is the most likely as he plays on the outside and has the quicks to play in the Bills cover 2. Laurinaitis is the next most likely as he has better cover skills than Maualuga and is pretty much a perfect fit for MLB in a cover 2. Maualuga seems unlikely to me as he is kind of the classic 4-3 MLB and I think he and Poz standing next to each other wouldn’t work as well.
Watch out for Darry Beckwith, Marcus Freeman and Aaron Curry too. If Gerald McRath or Brandon Spikes declare early, they will be very interesting names as well. It should be a great draft for LBs.
by kaisertown on
Sep 5, 2008 9:11 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Condensed Vent/Rant
First of all, thanks to everyone here for all that you do here. I haven’t been posting recently because I’m a pissed off Bills fan right now. My posts would just drag you all down. I still read the Rumblings here, though.
Why am I so pissed? In order: the quarterback, the left tackle, and now Crowell is just salt into the wound. In my opinion, when healthy, Crowell is/was the Bills’ best linebacker. He’s a young, ascending playmaker with no glaring weaknesses in his game. The biggest thing is I have a difficult time being interested in the Bills if I don’t believe in the quarterback. And right now I don’t. I can’t sleep at night. I hope I don’t need therapy. LOL!
Draft talk already? Now I’m a little more interested in posting. Prior to this Crowell mess, I wanted the Bills to resign Peters, Evans, AND Crowell (I don’t think that is too much to ask considering the Cowboys just resigned 53 Pro Bowlers this past offseason). That way, the Bills could focus their 2009 offseason (free agency and draft) on legitimately addressing their weaknesses such as DE and TE (and possibly QB, too).
I think not having Crowell, and thus having to address a need at LB, may very well comprimise how well the Bills can address other needs such as DE and TE. I don’t want some second or third-tier DE because we are forced to draft a LB so early.
Brandon Spikes…any relation to TKO?
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on
Sep 5, 2008 10:10 AM EDT
up
0 recs
What a joke
I really wish our fans took the hard stance with this organization that Wilson’s lap dog front office takes with its players. Instead, we set records for season tickets for a team that hasn’t made the playoffs this decade. Oh well, I’m sure glad we’re saving money by drawing a line in the sand with these greedy players. Give me a break…And who gives a crap about the draft, 4 days before the season. I feel like we’re sheep as Bills fans and it makes me sick. I just got this news and I can’t wait to read Chris Brown’s spin. That should be rich (like Wilson).
Never forget 56-10. Revenge.
by SuperFan82 on Sep 4, 2008 8:58 PM EDT 0 recs
Not sure what this has to do with us or with Crowell, Nick. Nobody gives a crap about the draft right now. I give a crap about what Crowell’s loss means for the season.
This rant is lost on me.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 4, 2008 9:05 PM EDT
up
0 recs
season tickets
I’m referring to the admirable, yet sad, fact that Buffalo has sold somewhere in the neighborhood of 57k season tickets this year and this is how our front office repays us- by conducting pissing matches with key veteran players like Crowell and Peters. That’s a joke….The draft rant was a separate thought based soley on having glanced up and seeing a discussion about college linebackers; I find that type of talk to be wildly depressing, but if that’s what you enjoy, go for it. I was merely thinking out loud about how little that matters.
Never forget 56-10. Revenge.


