Seahawks Week: Seattle needs production from tight ends early
Welcome to "Seahawks Week", Rumblers! In an effort to learn all that we can about the Buffalo Bills' season opening opponent, the Seattle Seahawks, we'll be joined once per day by John Morgan of Field Gulls throughout this week. John is a superbly knowledgeable blogger when it comes to the X's and O's of the game, and he'll give us some excellent perspective on the Seahawks as a team heading into Sunday's tilt. To see all posts related to Seahawks Week, click here.
This, folks, is our final installment of "Seahawks Week". I'd like to publicly thank John Morgan for the wealth of Seahawks knowledge he's provided us throughout this week leading up to the game; now we know our opponent better than we could have imagined heading into opening weekend.
Our last topic? Rookie tight end John Carlson. Can he have an impact in Seattle right away? John's thoughts below...
Buffalo Rumblings: One of my personal favorite prospects pre-draft that I would have loved to have seen the Bills grab was TE John Carlson. We know he sits atop Seattle's depth chart at this point; how has he looked through the pre-season, and how big will his role be in Seattle as a rookie?
John Morgan, Field Gulls: Not so sensational during the preseason. He never was a big contributor and was most noteworthy for his penalties. That surprised and disappointed me, because I fully expected the polished Carlson to have a big preseason and win the starting spot outright. Luckily he won the spot, because the team needs him to play well his first season.
For Carlson, it's not so much his fantasy stats, though plentiful receptions would be keen, but his support abilities. First, the team needs a tight end that can aggressively stretch the seam and free Seattle's wide receivers from a safety assault over the middle. Second, Carlson needs to step up his run blocking. Shaun Alexander's 2005 tour through the various end zones of the NFL was built on a balanced attack that could run or pass from multiple formations.
If he can do those two things, Carlson will play a major part in Seattle's offense, no matter his total receptions. If he can't, Seattle will again be forced into consistent 3 and 4 wide receiver sets.
***
I appreciate the fact that Carlson needs only to play a supporting role in his rookie season, but I don't think that's the case in Week 1 - the only Seahawks game that matters for us. Seattle is dinged up in their receiving corps, and unless the Bills become suddenly, maddeningly deficient at defending the toss sweep on Sunday, Seattle is going to have to throw well to beat the Bills. I'm not sure I can confidently say that Courtney Taylor and Nate Burleson can beat the Bills through the air; Carlson needs to be a receiving threat on Sunday to maximize Seattle's chances of notching a road win.
I liked Carlson pre-draft, and I think the Seahawks have found themselves a consistent long-term starter at the position. I don't think he's ready to contribute in a statistically meaningful way, however; Seattle may be forced to play Jeb Putzier at tight end in obvious passing downs against the Bills. To be quite frank, I like our chances defending a receiving corps consisting of Burleson, Taylor, Carlson, Putzier, Maurice Morris and Julius Jones. Of course, I've been wrong before (see: Willie Parker, "who the hell is he?" RB, Pittsburgh, in 2004 season finale).
Read Related
Comments
One reason
that Seattle will complete passes is that dratted West Coast offense vs. our 5 yards off the line of scimmage CB’s. Ugh! On the positive side, I have Nate Burleson as a 3rd WR on one of my FF teams… Expect Seattle to dink and dunk us to death on Sunday, unless the Bills’ coaching staff has seen the light about CB coverage. I hear Seattle will be without their starting RT.
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Sep 5, 2008 4:01 PM EDT 0 recs
It's really not Burleson or Taylor you need to worry about.
This team has never been a deep-threat or particularly explosive passing crew. What you should be afraid of is the backfield options that Hasselbeck has for the first time since…well…ever. The WCO makes the most out of these guys.
You also have to worry about the slot receiver. John Morgan has a theory that Bobby Engram (largely the slot guy over the last few seasons) has had terrific seasons not because of any special ability, but because the WCO inherently makes the most out of the receivers who play in the slot. Don’t be surprised if Jordan Kent has a pretty good day, but like I said, not because Kent is special, but because that’s simply the way the system works.
Just be warned, Hasselbeck has done fairly well with similar weapons in the past:
2002: 88.7 QB rating
WRs:
Darrell Jackson
Bobby Engram
Koren Robinson
Alex Bannister
Kevin Kasper
James Williams
2003: 88.7 QB Rating
Darrell Jackson
Bobby Engram
Koren Robinson
Alex Bannister
Taco Wallace
And, of course, you can’t forget that unlike last season, we actually have a legitimate rushing attack this year. Adding Mike Wahle to the LG position and shifting Rob Sims to RG is a dramatic o-line improvement, and dumping Shaun Alexander in favor of a committee consisting of Julius Jones, Mo Morris, TJ Duckett, and Justin Forsett constitutes a run game that hasn’t been seen in Seattle in a few seasons. Those failed third-and-short conversions that were all too frequent last year aren’t going to be such a frequent problem anymore.
So, long story short, despite having some banged up WRs (our WR group was pretty banged up last season as well), the offense isn’t going to roll over.
by BrianL on Sep 5, 2008 4:21 PM EDT 1 recs
For all the Seahawks fans....
Why do you think you have a legit running attack all of a sudden??
Before last year, didn’t you all think Morris stunk?
Add two busts from other teams in Jones and Duckett and it’s not like you have a great lineup there.
Why all the optimism in these guys all of a sudden? Is it the OL?
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 5, 2008 9:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I always thought
That Morris and Michael Turner were comparable backs. Turner just got more publicity and Morris is older. Look at Morris’s numbers next to Turners and you’ll see what I mean.
Why? Because the Seahawks rock my socks.
by Chickadee on
Sep 5, 2008 10:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I don't see it
Besides Turner weighing 30 lbs more, their ypc aren’t that close…5.5 for Turner, 4.3 for Morris…Turner has 3 rushes that were greater than 70 yards, Morris has a few in the 40’s. Turner is a big play threat, Morris doesn’t seem to be.
I guess the way they’ve been used is similar, but I’m not sure I can see how they are comparable players in their games…
~K
by Kurupt on
Sep 5, 2008 10:29 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You underestimate just how terrible Shaun Alexander was.
Just having an average rushing attack is an incredible improvement for this team.
Jones and Morris are complementary backs, which is what you look for in a committee. All Duckett is here for is short-yardage conversion, which he’s fully capable of.
More importantly, each one of these backs are well suited to the passing game, which is something Seattle hasn’t had in years.
by BrianL on
Sep 5, 2008 10:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You're also forgetting this team has a much improved O-line this season.
Even with Locklear out and Willis in, the addition of Mike Wahle and relocation of Rob Sims is another dramatic improvement. No, you’re not going to see the kind of results we got in 2005, but you likely will see a slightly above-average rush unit.
by BrianL on
Sep 5, 2008 10:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
The committee of Ducket, Jones, and Morris
do many things that Alexander just couldn’t do.
1. Blocking. Alexander was like your back up QB blocking for your kicker on muffed field goal attempts. He was pitiful. Jones and to a lesser degree Morris are both adequate, and Jones is superb at blocking. With this comes comes a great recognition of blitz pickups. Alexander could not for the life of him pick this idea up.
2. Catching. Alexander never was a good passer. Most of his receptions in the decent years were due to easy 4th read drop-offs and screen passes. Jones is a superb receiver who could easily spread out and need to be a focus of the defense. Morris as well. Also, both Morris and Jones are smart players who can find seams in a zone. Both important parts of the WCO.
3. North to South running. You will not see sweeps. You may see an occasional counter play. You will see dives. You will see runs between A and B gaps. Alexander became someone who stopped trusting his blockers, and would wait for holes. Jones, Morris ’08(he only started doing this this pre-season), and Duckett hit the hole. Mike Solari is the biggest part of our run game. The man is our O-line coach and he is the sole reason our running game will be top 15 this year.
4. Owen Schmitt gives us optimism. If you don’t know. Youtube him.
3.
XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.
by Christian on
Sep 5, 2008 11:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
random 3.
XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.
by Christian on
Sep 5, 2008 11:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Rec'd
for being a good argument and not insulting.
XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.
by Christian on Sep 5, 2008 5:24 PM EDT 0 recs
Dude...
huh?
XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.
by Christian on
Sep 5, 2008 6:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Hard to insult a team I respect. Thanks for the rec. Truth be told, we’ve got a heck of a lot of respect for Field Gulls here as well. Y’all are awesome.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 5, 2008 7:01 PM EDT
up
0 recs
And please don't think we are trolls. This is all in good fun.
After Sunday, unless we meet in the Super Bowl, might not hear from us for a while.
XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.
by Christian on
Sep 5, 2008 7:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Word
but know, I’ve got a team I’ll be pulling for all year long in the AFC.
Why? Because the Seahawks rock my socks.
by Chickadee on
Sep 5, 2008 8:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
“Christian”, “redwolf” or any other ‘hawks fans aren’t close to synonymous with “troll” here. Y’all are classy.
by Brian Galliford on
Sep 5, 2008 8:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Well....

XBOX live gamertag: BANE509...I would die tonight for my beliefs.
by Christian on
Sep 5, 2008 9:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I lolled
Why? Because the Seahawks rock my socks.
by Chickadee on
Sep 5, 2008 10:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs















