The Football Gods Finally Shine On Us
Ron's post got me thinking. It is hard to imagine going after Pepers or (more likely) Suggs given the Bills history of spending in free agency. However, what if getting Suggs were to be part of a larger overall plan? If by some miracle the football gods were to shine down upon the Buffalo Bills and we did land Suggs I could see the following chain of events occurring.
1. We trade back in the first to no farther than the #21 Philly pick. With that we get a late round 2nd or another 3rd. In the first round we then pick Brandon Pettigrew. He is projected as a mid 20's pick now. He needs work on his passing game but he is way ahead of the curve in run blocking. He seemed to handle LB's and DLinemen at the Senior Bowl with ease. He likes to run block and it shows. He is simply a force at run blocking already.
2. Round 2 we pick the best C on the board. Oh please, football gods, make Alex Mack be there after his Senior Bowl appearance. Either way we get one of the top 3 centers in this draft. Mack, Unger and Woods are all good at run blocking now. That gives us two pieces of the puzzle in place.
Now we have two picks before the 4th round. Either another 2nd and a 3rd or two 3rds. With the first of these two we choose the best playmaker available between a DT, LB, or S. With the second pick we do the same thing only we have eliminated one position. My guess would be to get a LB and DT.
3. Oops, I screwed up the numbers. No matter. It is now our 4th round pick and we land Quinn Johnson. A beheamoth FB with hands! He clearly stood out at the Senior Bowl as a blocker and ball carrier. We want him in this draft. He will be our third running back and he is a punishing blocker. As a bonus he is also a good receiver.
4. 5th and 6th round picks go to OG and S. Fill some holes and try to upgrade depth. The 7th round pick who cares. Choose whomever you want.
What this means is that by landing Suggs we can emphatically switch to a running game first - say 55-60 percent of the time. We have now plugged in to our offense a stud TE run blocker, a very good to stud run blocking C, and a punishing run blocking FB. We have filled the remaining pieces on offense to give us what surely would be now an elite running game. ANd on defense we now have the disruptive end we need, an upgrade at LB and hopefully good depth at DT. The offense gets 3 excellent players and the D gets the rest. This is all made possible by landing a stud DE in free agency. This draft becomes very doeable and the whole picture makes sense. And now with an emphasis on the run game, Trent has much less pressure on him to develop. Now I can understand the reasoning for going HARD after Suggs. It has been a long time since the football gods have shined down upon us in such a wonderful way. The Bills are a bit overdue. You are right, Ron, it makes sense to spend big on Suggs. If this were to happen, I would have to completely change my prediction for next season. I like that.
This FanPost was written by a registered user of Buffalo Rumblings. Its views do not necessarily reflect the views of Rumblings' editorial staff, but are just as valued as our own.
1 recs |
13 comments
Comments
Sorry to burst your bubble, but see today’s 1PM posting for why none of this is going to happen. :)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jan 28, 2009 11:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
No Pettigrew in the first.
We don’t need another offensive project or a blocking TE. We already have that in Fine and it’s a waste of a first.
by twoeightnine on Jan 28, 2009 11:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Agree fully. Just say no to Pettigrew. He’s a project, has a bit of a problem with the law (right?). He’s not the WR-type TE this team so desperately needs.
Greshman, that would have justified a 1st round pick, imo. Next year!
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 28, 2009 12:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
what
many of us fail to remember is we have Jason Peters to resign to huge money, possibly Greer to dole out cash too. In next couple of years Edwards and Lynch will be due up for huge extensions…….we have another #11 pick that if we use will get another $13 mill guaranteed. We have to cut some key guys or do some trades in order to throw around $9 million to one player per year
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Jan 28, 2009 11:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
1. Yes, Peters needs to be re-signed before he goes home to pout through another offseason. If memory serves, Buffalo has some ungodly amount of cap space available. (Does someone have that number available?) The Bills can re-sign Peters and go after Suggs or Peppers.
2. Greer is a luxury. The Bills have McGee and McKelvin to start, Corner and Youboty to fight it out for the 3rd role—the loser to be the 4th. There’s no reason to compete for Greer’s services, especially since some team will likely throw more than $6 million a year at him.
3. Edwards will be up for a huge extension only if he plays better in 2009.
4. I think Lynch has 2 more years on his deal so he will be due for an extension soon. I don’t know what happens with the RFA issue in 2010.
5. Cutting ‘key’ guys like Kelsay and Royal and declining to re-sign guys like Fowler and Preston won’t exactly be painful.
6. Wilson has demonstrated that he’s willing to spend big on free agents. Bashing him for being cheap is simply incorrect. Bashing him for giving enormous contracts to free agents who don’t deserve them is another matter entirely.
by Ron From NM on Jan 28, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
7. It really won’t cost Buffalo all that much more to sign Peppers/Suggs and drop back in the draft than it would to sit tight at #11 and dabble with 2nd (or 3rd) tier free agents.
by Ron From NM on Jan 28, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
IF we were to go hard after Suggs or another good DE it does become possible to get Pettigrew and emphasize the run game. If Suggs and Peppers are not available and no other DE in free agency looks good, then we will undoubtedly use the #11 pick for a DE. Just proposing a scenario based upon aquiring a good DE in FA.
everything goes better with a BIG MACK
by keuka121 on Jan 28, 2009 12:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
good post
your post is exactly why I have wanted to address DE in free agency. I really think if the draft is played right, we can pick up three players at C, TE, and FB who are ready to play now and will allow us to develop a strong power running offense which will compliment our young, cerebral QB and our two power runners beautifully. I will believe in this front office if they demonstrate that they realize we have the pieces already in place to build a power, run first offense. Young, accurate passer, check. TWO strong fight through the tackles running backs, check. Largest offensive line in football, check. With Mack, Quinn Johnson, and Coffman, Pettigrew, or Beckum all available in this one draft we can check off the rest of the list this off-season.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 28, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We don't need to draft Pettigrew to emphasize the run game.
We have Fine for that. Besides, that wouldn’t be the reason that we’d ever take a TE as high as he’s going to go. Frankly, it would be one of the worst possible reasons to draft a first or second round TE. You don’t spend a high draft pick on a TE to block.
by twoeightnine on Jan 28, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pettigrew will be a good receiver with time and good coaching.
He is Hardy height at 6’6" so his receiving game will take time.
everything goes better with a BIG MACK
by keuka121 on Jan 28, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
KEUKA 21- NO FB in the 4th - way too high
I doubt if Southerland, Fiammetta, Quinn Johnson will be lucky to be picked and are at best 6th/7th round guys. Remember very few teams use FB and many already have a guy
most scouts have Johnson as a 6th/7th or UDFA
by freddyjj on Jan 28, 2009 5:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
OK we take him in the fifth!
everything goes better with a BIG MACK
by keuka121 on Jan 28, 2009 7:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Man that's hard
Is easier get one of big free agents than all of this happens. Really. But, you can’t blame the man for having a good dream at night ! :)
by hightower_mc on Jan 30, 2009 12:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 























