2008 Buffalo Bills Yards per Passing Attempt
Yards per Pass Attempt (YPA) is what Cold Hard Football Facts calls a “Quality stat”. That means it directly correlates to wins and losses. It is a better determining factor in the W column than passer rating, passing yards, and TD passes. Here’s the entire reasoning for YPA being a key stat if you want to read about it.
One problem with yards per attempt is that it is not consistent across the board with the inclusion of sack totals. Do you count sacks as a passing attempt and therefore count the yardage and the called pass or just simply divide the passing yards by the passes thrown? I will do both for you in this article highlighted by a conversation our offensive coordinator, Turk Schonert, had with ESPN’s John Clayton last summer at training camp. The YPA will be shown as passing yards divided by attempts (while the numbers that include sacks I will put in parentheses). For example, Brian Galiford threw 100 times for 800 yards, a healthy 8 YPA. But Mr. Galiford also took 20 sacks for 200 yards. If you take the sacks into account his real passing plays stat line should read 120 pass calls for 700 yards, a modest 5.8 YPA, or a pretty big difference. For this article, I will show Brian’s stats like this: 800 yards (700) on 100 attempts (120). The higher attempt number is with sacks included, the lower yard number are with sacks included.
The 2008 Buffalo Bills
Last year during the Buffalo Bills’ training camp in beautiful
Enter the 2008 NFL season and focus in on Turk’s prediction: 8 YPA. Trent Edwards averaged 7.22 yards per attempt (6.44 YPA), good for eleventh in the league according to ESPN.com. Either number is still the very number Clayton uses as the number to put pressure on defenses. It is over a full yard per attempt higher than the year before but doesn't reach the 8 YPA that Turk predicted. To me that is still a very impressive jump and it puts Edwards in the company of many Pro Bowl QBs. Clayton called his prediction a little high but not impossible.
Only 2 QBs in the NFL reached that elusive 8 YPA marker in 2008; Philip Rivers at 8.39 YPA (7.67 YPA with sacks) and Matt Schaub (seriously), who had 8.01 YPA (7.18 YPA). Drew Brees was third with 7.98 YPA (7.68), Jake Delhomme had 7.94 YPA (7.28), and Matt Ryan threw for 7.93 YPA (7.40). Trent's average - 7.22 YPA (6.44) - was just above Peyton Manning's 7.21 YPA (6.88) without including sacks. Some names farther down the list are #30 Marc Bulger (6.18 YPA), #22 Brett Favre (6.65 YPA), #21 Eli Manning (6.76 YPA), and #19 Donovan McNabb (6.86 YPA).
What does this tell us? Well it tells me that as much as we might get on Schonert's case, he was much better at what he did than Steve Fairchild was. (I'm not surprised. Are you?) Not that that's saying much. Fairchild's teams never got close to that YPA number we achieved last year. The plays Turk called and the offense's execution made the passing numbers significantly better all across the board. In addition to the big jump in yards per attempt, we threw for 366 more passing yards, 2 more scores, and Trent's passer rating was 15 points higher. We also threw for 26 more first downs in 2008 than we did in 2007. (Just for you power rushing guys like me, we also rushed for more yards in 2008, twice as many rushing TDs, higher yards per rushing attempt, and more rushing first downs, too.)
1 recs |
65 comments
|
Comments
Nice Post Matt
I’ve been on the keep Schonert around at least one more year camp for a while now. He was essentially a rookie – so we should at least give him another shot at this thing and show what he can do.
As you pointed out – we progressed in a lot of areas – this is a good thing folks.
When he got blasted throughout the year it was usually a play or two a game that everyone threw their hands up in the air and questioned the playcalling. I usually thought by looking at the whole game that he was actually pretty good.
I saw a LOT of plays that weren’t run correctly, missed assignments, dropped balls, in accurate throws that if those things weren’t done we’d have even better numbers. How many times did we see someone drop a screen pass?
All in all – I definately think we need to give him at least another year. I don’t think he’s horrible like everyone says. Just needs a little more experience and grooming. Also, as you point out – a few more weapons.
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Jan 30, 2009 8:44 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think he’s horrible like everyone says. Just needs a little more experience and grooming.
I don’t think he’s horrible either. But if he wants to actually improve on his improvements, he needs to be a tad more creative, particularly with formations and alignments.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jan 30, 2009 8:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d also like to see a few more misdirection plays – counters on runs more often too. Your right – but I think with more time and having the opportunity to review all of last years tape – he will be on the right track.
For our sake lets hope so
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Jan 30, 2009 8:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
improve on his improvements?
haha, that sounds funny
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Jan 30, 2009 11:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Matt
Great post. Well researched and well written. Rec’d.
by thefourwinds on Jan 30, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
this
highlights a couple of things. One) it wasn’t all Turk’s fault. But 2) the personnel is just not that great the skill positions besides RB. Until we find a complement to Mr Lee Evans, a guy that can catch just as many balls as Lee can or more, this offense will be stuck in mediocrity. We have the huge OL, the 2 solid RB’s, the blocking TE, the deep threat, an underneath 3rd down WR in Reed. But besides that the talent is bare at the WR/pass catching TE position. Needs to be addressed and soon. Steve Johnson could be a nice underneath guy as well, and that would be awesome to pluck a 7th rounder into a contributor on offense, but this offense needs one more weapon. Badly.
At the end of the day however, offensive success is predicated on scheme and QB play. So the real question you should ask is do you trust Turk to get better with scheme and playcalling and Trent to get better at executing it?
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Jan 30, 2009 9:19 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I trust that Turk will run the ball more next year than he did this year....
mark my words.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 30, 2009 9:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We don't need a guy who can catch as many balls as Lee.
We need Lee to step up his game. Josh has only 11 fewer receptions the past two years and he’s played in 4 less games. Lee needs to become a bona fide number and live up to his new contract. He needs to play more like 2006 than 2007 and 2008.
by twoeightnine on Jan 30, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
Evans has never been close to a bona fide numero uno. If he wants to show his worthiness for that contract, he better start having bigger games and seasons. I just can’t believe a guy getting paid that much is nothing more than a deep threat.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Jan 30, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We also need Trent to make his receivers look better. That’s what the top QB’s in the league do. If Trent can take another step up in his play, I think we’ll be talking about the receivers playing better….
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Jan 30, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Which one would you like?
You mentioned that we have the blocking TE and you thought that was a good thing. But you also mentioned we need a pass catching TE. If we had a pass catching TE, then we sort of lose the blocking TE. If we had both TE’s on the field, then the extra WR would be on the bench. The run game would suffer as well as the pass protection, so how exactly does the pass catching TE help?
I think we should utilize the blocking TE more and put an emphasis on the running game and better protection for the QB. Instead of drafting yet another TE this year, we need to concentrate on improving DE position (first) and the middle of the O-line. A quality C would help more than a pass catching TE. We do need another wide out threat and this should come from free agency. But it needs to be a WR, not a TE. TE’s should block and in the NFL, with the exception of very few elite TE’s, this is the norm. A blocking TE that can catch a couple passes per game would be a good change-of-pace and provide the surprise element but really does not need to be the focus of the offense like in KC. What else did they have and how successful are they anyways? The power running game, ball control offenseand protecting the QB is the key to succeeding in the NFL.
Blogger Approved Avatar(hopefully)
by JTM1023 on Jan 31, 2009 5:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well
i don’t expect that. The ratio was like 51/50 last year and with a 3rd year QB coming into his own, I expect if anything for him to wing it more. They just need to run better early in the game, so Trent can relax, PA pass, and play with a lead for once in a blue moon would be a nice change
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Jan 30, 2009 9:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it
Many of you seem to be looking back at the “good old day” of the 2008 season (must have been very early).
Perhaps a refresher is in order?
From “Bills failing schedule, divisional tests”:
#1: Play calling – This is a topic I plan on exploring further tomorrow morning. Buffalo’s offense has become as easy to read as a Dr. Seuss limerick. Formationally, the Bills are giving away their intentions on about 90% of their plays – and that was as of two weeks ago; nothing has changed since. They’ve abandoned the run too quickly, despite not losing any of their last three games by more than 10 points. The predictability is, at least in part, responsible for the bad play of the offensive line – it’s hard to block defenders who know what’s about to happen. It’s gotten so bad that I have officially begun to refer to the Bills’ offensive coordinator as Turk Schonert-Fairchild-Mularkey. So if you see “T S-F-M” around these parts, thats who I’m referring to. (What’s more, Mularkey is now mentoring the best young QB in the game, Atlanta’s Matt Ryan. The football gods hate us.)
also these two articles dedicated to the subject.
http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2008/11/11/658312/predictable-bills-play-cal
http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2008/12/15/692719/fateful-bills-play-call-is
Have we forgotten the pleas for more screen passes, more slants, more runs to the outside for God’s Sake, etc. Saying Turk is better than Fairchild is like saying dog poop smells better than cat poop!!!! Couldn’t the better production have more to do with Edwards and Lynch having more experience rather than Turk being better than Fairchild. Given the chance, I would still ax the guy.
"There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path"
by Joe P. on Jan 30, 2009 10:04 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, all of that is why I said…
I don’t think he’s horrible either. But if he wants to actually improve on his improvements, he needs to be a tad more creative, particularly with formations and alignments.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jan 30, 2009 10:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he needs to get less creative with all of the motions and alignments, and more creative with the plays he runs within two or three set alignments. You don’t need a massive playbook, or guys motioning all over the place to fool the defense. You need to come up with a simple game plan that your offense can execute more successfully. You can change that plan every week based on the team you’re playing, but it needs to be simple. Especially for a younger team like this.
by bruuuuce_02 on Jan 30, 2009 11:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Creative?
How about smarter?
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Jan 30, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
smart and creative are completely different. Knowing when to call a play and how to call plays at the right time and learn the flow of the game are completely different than the design of plays.
Our offense sucks. Predictable, few playmakers, good between the 20’s but sucks at producing points bottom line
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Jan 30, 2009 12:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I actually agree with you. I don’t think he is that smart.
by bruuuuce_02 on Jan 30, 2009 12:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Smart… creative… whatever. How about “better”?
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jan 30, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So basically he has to improve his coordinating.
At least on the offensive side of the ball.
by twoeightnine on Jan 30, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great teams are almost always predictable, but they are never one-dimensional.
Opponents know what is coming, but they can’t stop it.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on Jan 30, 2009 10:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Saying Turk is better than Fairchild is like saying dog poop smells better than cat poop!!!
YES!
I feel like we’ve been lacking some Joe-isms lately. We need more!
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Jan 30, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see you upgraded your avatar...
Much more appropriate. A better symbol of Kelsay’s production.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on Jan 30, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yup
had to include that stat line in there too….
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Jan 30, 2009 11:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I noticed.
When you consider that tackles are an unofficial statistic, who really knows if Kelsay even made that 1 tackle in that game, jumped on a pile at the end of a play, etc? Very sad.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on Jan 30, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
For still further analysis of Turk, go here:
http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2008/12/3/678706/comparing-first-year-offen
Fellow SBN blogger Taiko at Turf Show Times rates the first year offensive coordinators around the league.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 30, 2009 10:51 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
im sorry, this doesn't make Turk look better at all
Nobody here ever questioned Turk’s ability to get production out of his QB and having been an NFL QB for ten years and a QB coach after that I would expect no less. MRW, your article fails to address any of the problems we actually have with Turk. Abandoning the run inside the five, Turk abandoning the run ALTOGETHER by the 2nd quarter, the utter absence of a running back in the backfield even on 1st and 2nd downs, leaving the defense with no questions as to the fact that we were throwing, and a refusal to ever, EVER, take a deep shot despite having Lee Evans on the roster. So your article demonstrates he is a great QB coach but it does nothing to address the fact that as an offensive coordinator, who is responsible for getting an entire offensive unit to work like a well oiled machine and to keep defenses guessing, he utterly failed last year. YPA is no defense of Turk. He is my least favorite part of the Bills sans Preston. I still maintain that Turk cost us at least 2 or 3 games last year and maybe more, with his horrendous playcalling.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 11:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
While I respect your opinion, Poz...
YPA puts pressure on the defense to stop the pass. As I wrote in the article all of the offensive numbers went up: points, rushing yards, TDs, you name it. If you want me to take a look at the other stuff you mention I can but every offensive number was up.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 30, 2009 11:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it does put pressure to stop the pass
but of what use is that when you come out in on no back sets, refuse to run inside the five and you give up on the run before the half? Forcing defenses to defend the pass works if you keep Marshawn in on 2nd down or at the 3 yard line because then they are looking out for both which allows you to find holes in the defense. Turk never had defenses guessing as to what we were doing, which makes putting pressure to stop the pass irrelevant. Another factor that makes the YPA irrelevant is that by giving up on the run we could never run an effective play action. In fact, by rarely using a back in the backfield on passing downs we could never run a play action period. Passing numbers, putting pressure to stop the pass, only works if you are dedicated to the run. And while we were a great running team, and apparently a great passing team according to your numbers, Schonert never had defenses guessing which erased any advantages we could have gained by being effective at both. In essence, he was a horrendous playcaller which was basically his job!
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 11:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think though that the good teams don’t care if you know whats coming (to an extent obviously) and they are going to lineup and go for it anways.
But I think Poz that he got better over the last few games of the season. I don’t think your statements speak true for every game or every situation. just those that stick out.
do we have any stats on the rushing attemts inside the red zone or more specifically inside the 10 for the season? might be more telling if we knew those answers.
i dont’ think he was a horrendous playcaller – i think thats going a little over the top. easily room for improvement – but he wasn’t horrible at it
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Jan 30, 2009 11:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
do we have any stats on the rushing attemts inside the red zone or more specifically inside the 10 for the season? might be more telling if we knew those answers.
i’m was thinking game by game – number of rushing attempts inside the 10. if anyone wants to do that
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Jan 30, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you may be right
maybe he got better towards the end but by the end of the season I was too delirious from having watched JP Losman again to see straight. I think you may be forgetting what a horrendous play caller he really was last year. Go look at the older archives to remember what it felt like this year, I get the feeling that like most memories a lot of people are forgetting how bad it really was and remembering the good stuff. He was awful! Nobody was ever confused by him.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 11:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I remember – but it never really bothered me as much as everyone esle. If your a better team it doesn’t matter what you run. How many times do the patriots pass out of the 4 WR set? who stops them? do they care? obviously they do change it up but you know what i’m getting at.
execution is a part of this converstion that is getting lost. without execution it doesn’t matter what he calls.
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Jan 30, 2009 12:00 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
"If your a better team it doesn’t matter what you run."
Rec’d
Rec’d
Rec’d
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on Jan 30, 2009 12:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
laughable
I’m sorry that is a silly silly thing to say. No offense, I really don’t mean to be sarcastic, but are you guys kidding me?? We are not a better team. We are young, inexperienced, and do not have elite playmakers. When you are not the Pats, with Tom Brady, Randy Moss, and Wes Welker, it is the coaches job to put his team in a position to win with the talent he has. When you have Trent Edwards, Lee Evans, and Josh Reed it doesn’t make any sense to run a 4 WR set with no backs. No, if you are coaching the Bills you lean on Marshawn and Freddie and attack with play actions, screen, and a power running game. I’m sorry, “If your a better team it doesn’t matter what you run” doesn’t apply here. Are you saying that the Lions should just go all out like the Pats. Or that maybe the Ravens should have? No, the Ravens won as much as they did by playing to the strengths of their players and calling a good plan with what they had
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no what I’m saying is that maybe we just AREN’T good enough. That Schonert is a product of junk drafts and keeping junk players around too long.
he doesn’t get a pass – but you cannot undervalue those points. I mean Robert Royal? josh reed as WR#2? Duke Preston?
He’s hadicapped by those positions.
Are you saying that the Lions should just go all out like the Pats.
absolutely – if your not better and you know it then why not go all out? lay it all on the table and play your cards the best way you can. maybe thats just me – but i would be MORE aggressive towards an opponent if I knew they were light years ahead of me. take my best shot and we’ll go to battle
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Jan 30, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think
we have a far far better shot of beating the Pats by playing a controlled, run the ball, take shots when you’ve got their defense compromised strategy than we do trying to beat the Pats at their own game by having Trent go throw for throw with Tom Brady and hoping that Josh Reed, Lee Evans, Roscoe, and Robert Royal and can outplay the Pats weapons. You don’t just blindly go all out, with lesser talent you have to outwit your opponent and let your players make plays they are capable of.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Bills need better players.
If the Bills had better players, they would be able to run esentially the same plays over and over again and still have success a majority of the time. You know that you are dominant when your opponents know what is coming, but they can’t stop you.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on Jan 30, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but we don't have better players!
I don’t understand your argument here Ft Worth (i just shortened your name by two letters, wasnt as time saving as i thought.) Why would you run plays that better players would be successful at? You run plays that OUR players would be successful at. It’s like telling a guerrilla group fighting a conventional army to use conventional battle tactics. The Pats are a super power, we are not. That doesn’t mean we can’t beat them but it means we have to beat them on our terms and with our own strategy which play to our strengths and cover up our weaknesses.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
thank you, sir.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...rec'ed Poz's comment
"There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path"
by Joe P. on Jan 30, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's clear this up...
There seems to be some miscommunication (Bledsoe’s favorite excuse for throwing interceptions, by the way) here. I agree with what you are saying. The Bills don’t have better players. The Bills need better players. Unfortunately, Schonert has to make do with what he has.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on Jan 30, 2009 1:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yes
I agree but wouldn’t you say that Schonert has failed to make due with what he has? Not every coordinator can expect the best talent.
Also, I have a theory that Bledsoe was a stoner. In all his roster pictures his eyes were bloodshot like crazy. Then on the field he would just drop fumbles untouched or throw absurd picks like he was playing high. “Oh mannn, I didn’t see that linebacker bro.”
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 1:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok so you say he didn't call the kind of game you are advocating...
but every number on the Bills offense was better this year. We scored more than a TD more a game in 08 than 07.
People complained that the Bills ran out of the shotgun but that is when they have the light nickel back in vs. the backer. What do you want from the guy? He ran out of lots of different looks. He passed out of a lot of differnt looks, too.
BTW, poz, I saved your comment from earlier and I’ll take a look at some of the other stats you wanted to see how he stacks up. It could be a good or bad thing but the numbers won’t lie, I promise that.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 30, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Any of us could have improved on Fairchild this past year. Saying that Schonert improved on the 2007 numbers isnt’ exactly any kind of compliment.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Jan 30, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I won't argue that.
Fairchild was terrible.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 30, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and if you have any others let me know
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 30, 2009 5:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you do have a fair point about execution
but with a young team you have to expect that. A good coordinator would see the youth on this team and simplify the playbook as opposed to getting cute and running 4 WR sets at the 4 yard line on 1st down. Just pound the rock and go from there!
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 12:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but poz your saying it like he should do it every time. wouldn’t that be predicatable as well?
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Jan 30, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
what im saying is start simple
run the ball, force teams to play the run then you can more effectively use your young QB with play actions to catch the defense off guard. Also, if you start with the run then when your young QB and below average weapons do go to throw they have more space to work with as defenders come up to play the run, thereby giving your below average players a better chance to make above average plays. Its not predictable, its simplified. Wouldn’t you rather put more pressure on Lynch and Jackson and let Edward and our subpar weapons make plays with less attention on them then asking a second year third rounder to carry the offense with Evans, Reed, and Royal?
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
run the ball, force teams to play the run then you can more effectively use your young QB with play actions to catch the defense off guard.
so lineup and do what you do and who cares….thats what i’ve been saying!
of course i would rather put the pressure on Lynch and Jackson – this is where he needs to improve – i’m not debating that at all.
And that is where he needs to improve – which i’m sure you’ll get no arguement from anyone
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Jan 30, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the question is
whether or not Turk learns. What did you see at the end of the season that encouraged you? My main point is that Turk did not seem to comprehend the balance required between the running game and passing game to keep teams guessing. He sort of lined up, said we are going to throw, just try and stop us. And just about every single good defense did stop us. While that is admirable in a way I’d like to see a coordinator who lined up with Lynch in the backfield, maybe Freddie on the line and Evans and Reed, who knows maybe once in a while throw Roscoe in the backfield, and say you have no idea what the hell I’m about to do, now try and stop us.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What did you see at the end of the season that encouraged you?
well after all of the criticism I tried to pay attention to specific down and distances and just general overall playcalling. It seemed that the last few games he started to figure some things out and ran more in the red zone.
or it just got so blown out of propotion that when I paid particular attention to it – it wasn’t as bad as I thought.
i’d like some stats on that I guess – but i’m too lazy to do the work
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Jan 30, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also
Trent’s average – 7.22 YPA (6.44) – was just above Peyton Manning’s 7.21 YPA (6.88)…#21 Eli Manning (6.76 YPA), and #19 Donovan McNabb (6.86 YPA)… What does this tell us?"
This list tells me that the YPA doesn’t mean all that much in terms of indicating the effectiveness of an offense or the quality of a coordinator, QB, or system. As much as I love Trent, and believe me I am a huge supporter, he was not better than Peyton Manning, Eli Manning or Donovan McNabb. The Bills offense wasn’t better than the Colts, Giants, or Eagles, and Turk Schonert was not a better coordinator than Kevin Gilbride of the Giants (funny huh?), Tom Moore of the Colts, or Marty Morhinwig of the Eagles. Again, I respect your opinion too MRW, but I don’t think it defends Schonert.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Jan 30, 2009 11:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I never said it makes them better...
but the fact that this stat shows the kind of pressure you put on a defense means something.
As for Morningweg, the Eagles run the West Coast and typically they have a low YPA because they do the short dump off.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 30, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cold Hard Football Facts
Pretty cool site.
I found this stat – Quality Standings.
Shows how teams performed against the quality teams in the league. Guess where we were…..right at the bottom. Winless against good teams, same as Detroit, Cincy and KC. To top it off, we lost those games 24.6-12.9. Pathetic….We are so far from being a good team it’s disgusting….
Carry on
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Jan 30, 2009 11:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
hahahahaha...
It’s funny because the two worst divisions in that rating produced the two teams that are in the Super Bowl. So much for one and done.
by WhyBillsWhy on Jan 30, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Kurupt,
I didn’t want to bring that up………
But you already knew we were 0-7 vs. teams with winning records. The only team we beat that was close was the Broncos.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 30, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm willing to settle for only 1 change to Turk's playcalling:
Consistent use of the Play Action. And by that, teach the players how to run it effectively.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 30, 2009 1:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I wish he would use more play action myself.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 30, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, its INSANE not to use PA against our foes
We have Lynch and Freddy, every opponent we play knows they need to stop those two and Evans, so why not take advantage of this inclination with PA? His unwillingness to use it repeatedly, and often, ala the Colts or Giants is just plain baffling. If there is ONE thing I want the man to do more often is to call PA.
I told the witch doctor that I was in love with the Buffalo Bills, and instead of telling me to say "Oh eeh oh oh ah, ting tang walla walla wing bang" in order to make me feel better he told me to buy a gun and end it.
by WABillsfan on Jan 30, 2009 6:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



























