Bills 16, Jets 13 (OT): Week 6 Film Session
Finally, mercifully, re-watching a Buffalo Bills game was worth the time investment this week. Considering the length of the game and the fact that it's a busy week for me, I didn't get through all of the tape this week - my apologies. There are still several talking points to bring up from the Bills' 16-13 overtime victory over the New York Jets on Sunday.
Topics of conversation that you'll find after the jump: Dick Jauron; Ryan Fitzpatrick; the offensive line; the non-no-huddle offense; linebacker play against the run, and how opponents are exploiting them; Drayton Florence; team mistakes. Enjoy!
On Dick Jauron: I'll defer to MARVelous' ridiculously awesome FanPost from this morning for the bulk of the argument here. Jauron deserves credit for getting his troops ready. No, they didn't play particularly well, and yes, they were probably only alive late in this game because Mark Sanchez was so ridiculously awful. No, I wasn't particularly enthused about his decision to run to set up the field goal - but considering how the Bills' visit to the Meadowlands ended in 2008, I wasn't mad about it, either. The clock management, at any rate, was superb, as Rian Lindell kicked as the clock expired. I'm not asking anyone to change their opinions on whether Jauron needs to stay or go. Just play the hate game fairly. When the Bills lose, Jauron deserves some blame. When they win, he deserves some credit, too. I liked his game plans (specifically incorporating the slant pattern against the Jets' blitz), and his guys, as usual, played hard the whole way.
On Ryan Fitzpatrick: Let's walk a fine line here. Fitzpatrick was not good on Sunday. He also was not as bad as his stat line indicates. What I didn't like: his accuracy - and really, that's about it. The guy was all over the place with his throws, even on the slant to Lee Evans that ended in six points. He had perfect throws (the fade to Evans in overtime), and he had horrid throws (several bounced passes). What I did like, however, was his pocket presence and his decisiveness. Fitzpatrick kept plays alive with his feet, and he handled Jets pressures pretty well - and read them well pre-snap, I might add. The guy is nothing more than a backup quarterback, but he's a pretty good backup. I'm comfortable with him playing in a fill-in role. I will say, however, that the interception he threw in overtime was one of the poorest decisions and throws I've ever seen a quarterback make. Very Sanchez-like.
On the offensive line: People have been saying they played well on Sunday, and the fact is, they weren't bad. Particularly in terms of penalties, the Bills' offensive front cut down significantly - and that played a key role in the game. But they weren't great, either. The pass protection still sprung a few too many leaks for comfort, and the Bills averaged only 3.3 yards per carry between Marshawn Lynch and Fred Jackson, despite Kris Jenkins leaving early with a season-ending ACL injury. Still, the relative anonymity of players like Demetrius Bell and Jamon Meredith - both did well against creative Jets blitz packages - is better than we've had. As these guys get better, our offense will diversify - we've really limited our attack in order to give our quarterbacks bulked up protection schemes.
Oh, and before I forget - Meredith needs to remain the starter at right tackle. Nothing against Jonathan Scott, but even if he's healthy this week, continuity up front is paramount. The young guys aren't going to progress much this season if they're playing next to new people every week. Ride this five as long as you can, for better or worse.
On the non-no-huddle offense: For at least one week, the move was smart - not only because it gave the Bills an extra bit of rhythm offensively, but because it allowed the Bills to more easily change the tempo of the game. Fitzpatrick went no-huddle suddenly after a play and caught the Jets with about 15 defenders on the field. Having that no-huddle background in their pocket allowed for quick communication and an easy five yards - but not limiting the offense to solely the no-huddle allows the Bills to dictate even more. We'll see how the offense progresses in or out of the huddle, but for now, the tempo card is an extra bonus.
On our linebackers and difficulty defending the run: Misdirection plays are still killing this unit. In general, Buffalo's defensive line - ends and tackles alike - are playing well at the point of attack. Yes, there are blips there, but that's true of any NFL team. The gap control of the linebackers has been abysmal, and it's simply because they're trying to play fast against teams that are doing everything they can to out-think them. Both of Thomas Jones' big runs on Sunday came on plays in which all three linebackers on the field slid to the strong side of the run, and Jones cut behind their flow. Pretty simple. Those runs aren't big runs if there's proper safety contain, but the crux of the issue lies with linebackers simply not reading their keys well. Paul Posluszny is the only player of the three to consistently flash recognition and make a play at or behind the line of scrimmage against the run (though Keith Ellison did this once or twice as well). More study and more experience is obviously needed, but right now, cutbacks and misdirections continue to kill this team. It doesn't help when ends and safeties over-pursue, obviously, but the problems right now start at linebacker.
On Drayton Florence: I got on Florence's case a little bit in the pre-season for his pro-Michael Vick-to-Buffalo sentiment, but that's completely unrelated to his play on the field - and he's been lights out. His run support could use a face lift, but he's been outstanding in coverage. He drew Braylon Edwards a few times on Sunday, and more than held his own. He obviously held his own against any other receiver the Jets tossed on the field, because Edwards was the only Jets receiver to catch a pass. Florence brings an energy and swagger to the entire defensive backfield that Leodis McKelvin has, but does not display as frequency. He's been a great addition for this defense, and as well as Jabari Greer is playing in New Orleans, Florence has been just as good in Buffalo.
On team mistakes: Buffalo did not exactly improve in this department. They still committed 8 penalties for 64 yards, and the team still turned the ball over twice. In short, they still played like a brutally youthful football team. But the fact that the Jets turned it over six times, and committed 14 penalties for 96 yards, was the difference in the game. I've beaten the dead horse enough, so I'll sum it up: teams that make the fewest mistakes generally win football games. The Bills clearly still have a ton of work to do in this department themselves, but as long as they keep forcing their opponents into mistakes (or simply capitalizing on non-forced mistakes), they'll win some more football games.
46 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Whole hearted agree on gap control
I was screaming at the TV on almost every run play.
And on a side note how the hell could they call Lee Evans catch in OT a bobble! Did anyone watch the MNF game and Schefter to catch one in the end zone doing the exact same thing?!
I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City
Evans no doubt caught that ball. He was bringing in the ball from his hands to his body. That was text-book. Doesnt matter I guess cuz we won but that was one HELL of a throw and catch.
"Well, I’m always hungry and it’s time to eat" - Marshawn Lynch
The ball wasn’t possessed. It moved as he went out of bounds.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I said the same thing!
when i saw that Scheffer TD. Using the standard of Lee Evans’ overruled catch, Scheffer’s TD could never stand, but of course no one even raised the issue. Both of Scheffer’s hands came off the ball as he was getting a better grip on it, after which he only got one foot in bounds. No one called that a bobble, and they shouldn’t have called Evans’ handling a bobble. In both cases the receivers maintained control, which should be the issue, not whether they move a hand.
I hate to quibble with calls — mistaken calls are part of any game — but this was patiently studied on replay, overturning the correct call on the field. The thing is, we get so few pretty plays that we deserved to feel robbed on that one.
by Sixteenthback on Oct 20, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, but Scheffler gained full position as he dragged his second foot. Evans second foot had already come up off the ground when he fully possessed it.
Evans’ play was the right call. The ball was moving as his second foot came up.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Not what i saw
Scheffer collects the ball with both hands, one foot comes down, he re-grips the ball (and you could see daylight around it, both hands slightly off of it), then his other foot comes down, then he steps well out of bounds, nothing resembling a foot drag. Of course it wasn’t reviewed.
by Sixteenthback on Oct 20, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Here's the video
Actually, his right foot was still down when he gained possession, and he then was still able to drag it just in bounds for a third foot after it came up.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Pause that video when he has control of the ball – his foot that he dragged is already off the ground – it is as questionable as the Evans incompletion.
I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City
Here ya go

That’s when he gained possession. And you can see the right foot still down. But beyond that, his toes landed in bounds again before going out…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
yup, I was initially a little leery about that catch, but on the 2nd rewatch of it, he did do a better job
securing the ball on the way down and out of bounds than Lee did. Doesn’t take away from Lee though that it was a heck of a catch anyhow!
As my mother once said, common sense isn't as common as it should be, I'm looking at you Fewell, common sense says to play UP on the line against the slant.
Yes. This. Evans made a great catch…. but he wasn’t in bounds.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 21, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks for the summary Brian
Good job
If Fitz keeps playing, everyone needs to get used to terribly thrown passes. What he does well is move around in the pocket, take some chances and he knows when to tuck and run. He is quite good scrambling and isn’t terrible at making decisive moves/throws. What he’s not is a good thrower. He just isn’t accurate at all, and he will force some terrible passes. That leads to him being mistake prone and very, very erratic. I hope Trent gets well soon, but takes a page from Fitz’s book about getting it downfield more and being more decisive.
The OL was as you said not bad, but again they weren’t good. We have to run the ball better, a lot better. There simply aren’t many holes for Lynch and Jackson to run through. The pass protection was better, but it’s still a LONG way from being good. I agree that Meredith needs to keep playing, but more because I want to see if this guy can hold up and be a player for us in the future. We know Scott is mediocre and probably isn’t going to get any better. Meredith on the other hand still has a sizable upside. Let’s let him grow, just like we’re letting Bell grow on the other side.
Our LB’s have been poor against the run for years. I don’t think they’re going to fix that anytime soon. On Jones’ long TD, all three just ran straight ahead into blockers. None of them read the play correctly and instead were looking to take on blockers, which was very weird.
I liked the Florence addition this offseason and glad he’s justifying the pickup. He plays tough and physical, something we’ve needed in the secondary. Let’s see how he does against some good receivers though. We’ll be seeing Steve Smith, Andre Johnson, Mike Sims-Walker (yes I think he’s very good), Roddy White, Randy Moss, etc. coming up soon, so it’ll be interesting to see how he responds. I think he’ll do a good job. I also think he’ll be getting an INT soon…
Funny how we haven’t talked much about the mistakes from this past week. If the Jets didn’t have 6 turnovers and 14 penalties (both pathetic and horrible), we’d be much more critical about the Bills’ mistakes. As it is, 2 more turnovers and 8 more penalties just doesn’t cut it. They need to really improve in this area, and fast.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Funny how we haven’t talked much about the mistakes from this past week. If the Jets didn’t have 6 turnovers and 14 penalties (both pathetic and horrible), we’d be much more critical about the Bills’ mistakes. As it is, 2 more turnovers and 8 more penalties just doesn’t cut it. They need to really improve in this area, and fast.
agree with that. This game wasnt really a “win” by any means. I know we got the W and Im happy for that, but this isnt a game we should feel good about at all. No reason for us to be in this game and to give up 300+ yards on the ground is embarrassing. Poor D this week… all I can see is DeAngelo runnin aaaaaaaaallllll over us. Hope Im wrong… but almost 1000 yards given up on the ground in 4 weeks doesnt look like it would slow down this week.
"Well, I’m always hungry and it’s time to eat" - Marshawn Lynch
At this point I think we’re just so happy to see the team pull one out we’re not as concerned with all the mistakes.
Leave those for all the losing weeks to come! :P
Bills fan? In Colorado? It's more likely than you think.
by UZ on Oct 21, 2009 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I will say, however, that the interception he threw in overtime was one of the poorest decisions and throws I’ve ever seen a quarterback make. Very Sanchez-like.
He really “Sanchez’d” it.
It’s just this thing that people say around the league all the time. Like, when you screw something up in a really irreversible way, you ’Sanchez’d’ it. I don’t know where it comes from though. Do you think it comes from Mark Sanchez?
Look. He's a 3rd round draft pick from Stanford and he throws like one. He's a bumpkin. Pass.
BROADWAY SCHMO!
Love how the NY fans have already turned on him!
They are hard to play but not hard to beat.
- Mike Lombardi on the Buffalo Bills
Welcome to the NY media!
Bills fan? In Colorado? It's more likely than you think.
by UZ on Oct 21, 2009 3:00 AM EDT up reply actions
LOL.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 21, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Nothing about Byrd huh?
Seems kinda odd to me.
"In every adversity there lies the seed of an equivalent advantage. In every defeat is a lesson showing you how to win the victory next time." (Robert Collier)
by norcaliangelsfan on Oct 20, 2009 12:56 PM EDT reply actions
We kinda went over Byrd yesterday…
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Oct 20, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Is that supposed to be a bad joke, instead of saying overboard?
/sarcasm
I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City
I thought that was about Byrd overall.......
not just from yesterday.
"In every adversity there lies the seed of an equivalent advantage. In every defeat is a lesson showing you how to win the victory next time." (Robert Collier)
by norcaliangelsfan on Oct 20, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Jauron still needs to go!
I’m happy for DJ as I feel sorry for him as a fellow human being. He finally got a win, an AFC East win even, but he didn’t win this game for us, Sanchez did.
The clock management, at any rate, was superb, as Rian Lindell kicked as the clock expired. I’m not asking anyone to change their opinions on whether Jauron needs to stay or go. Just play the hate game fairly. When the Bills lose, Jauron deserves some blame. When they win, he deserves some credit, too.
I disagree. I don’t think Jauron managed the end of the 4th qtr. very well, running to set up a FG too far for his kicker to make, which the kicker DID miss. (didn’t this happen on a Mon. Night game last year?) The Bills should’ve won in the 4th, but didn’t due to Jauron. The Bills then should’ve lost in OT, but didn’t due to the Jets botching the snap on the FG attempt, and a rookie QB whose true colors have shown that he is a bum, just like Jauron.
They are hard to play but not hard to beat.
- Mike Lombardi on the Buffalo Bills
You’re not really disagreeing with me though. I mentioned yesterday that I’d have liked to see them get closer. The clock aspect, and that aspect only, is what I’m saying was good – that’s exactly how you want to end that game from the time end of things. Kick as the final tick is coming off the clock.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Oct 20, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s not like they were taking a knee. If you wanted them to get more yards you’d take a shot at a pass, and if it was incomplete you’d risk leaving more time for the Jets. The other risk is that if you pass you risk a sack.
There was a chance the Bills could run and get closer and run time off the clock.
To have a better chance to get more yards they would have needed to attempt a pass which opened up more risk than simply running a play on the ground (but why the pitch which is risking a 5 yard loss?).
Jauron of course takes the path of least risk. In the process he left his kicker with a 45-50 yard FG in a tricky stadium to kick in. It was Cleveland all over again – decision and result.
On the play before the kick we lost a yard on a run didn’t we?
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 21, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Some credit is due, but not that much
What did Jauron do that he deserves credit for? OK…he kicked a FG when time expired. I will give him that. Shouldn’t AVP get most of the credit for calling the slants? If Sanchez doesn’t have a horrid game, do the Bills win? What about the 300 plus yards we got gashed for? Shouldn’t Jauron get credit for that as well? Giving him credit for putting together a winning game plan vs the Jets would be like giving parking lot attendant #2 top billing in Bourne Identity.
Poor ball security leads to very painful outcomes
Not to nitpick but you’re still trying to blame everything that went wrong (how is the 300 rushing yards we gave up solely Jauron’s fault?) on Jauron while claiming that everything that went right was due to other people (If Sanchez doesn’t have a horrid game, do the Bills win?). I think Brian’s point is simply that you can’t have it both ways. If we lose because of Jauron then we win because of him too. I don’t think it’s fair to say we lose because of Jauron but win because of Sanchez and AVP.
I’m totally fine with not giving Jauron credit for “putting together a winning game plan” – but if you’re going to do that you can’t blame our losses on him either, the losses are a team effort as well.
"We want to win immediately. To say you're building is an incomplete sentence. ... You're building for a future coach and general manager."
-Marv Levy
Not really
I am not saying the 300 yds is all on Jauron, I am asking where in the piece about our LBs being the problem with the run defense is Jauron’s credit for them not playing well. I agree you can’t have it both ways. But it is hard to be consistent in your criticism from week to week because the credit/blame changes depending on what happens in the game. My point about AVP was that he called the slants. Now, if Jauron said on the sidelines….Hey Alex throw a slant, then he deserves more credit. If he said in the game planning meeting…..The slant will work vs the Browns, then he deserves some credit.
Either way, just because we won doesn’t mean we had a great game plan. The Bills didn’t play great football. The Jets QB just played worse than the whole Bills team did. Want to give credit where credit is due….give it to Sanchez.
Poor ball security leads to very painful outcomes
What I’m saying is that if that’s true, and Sanchez deserves the credit for this win – so be it. But then we have to go back to the previous game against the Browns and say that loss is a result of the team executing poorly, not Jauron being a terrible coach. It’s less about this game and more about the team as a whole.
Either Jauron is at fault when we lose and therefore gets credit when we win or Jauron is not at fault when we lose and therefore does not get credit when we win. To answer JPH – if we win in spite of Jauron then we must lose in spite of him too.
I understand your point about the situation changing in each game – but at a certain point you have to step back and say it just doesn’t make any sense to blame one guy for everything that goes wrong and nothing that goes right.
"We want to win immediately. To say you're building is an incomplete sentence. ... You're building for a future coach and general manager."
-Marv Levy
I get your point, but I tend to look at each game performance individually and therefore don't have to make that
generalization. I agree you can’t blame just one guy, but Jauron is in a unique position as HC where he is responsible for the whole team, but can make plays on the field. Is it fair? No, but that is the job. You can’t say that about any single player. Jauron could coach a poor game one Sunday in a loss and also coach a poor game where the players win is spite of the coaching. Of course, Jauron could also coach a good game…..could happen :-)
Poor ball security leads to very painful outcomes
it isn't possible to win in spite of jauron?
Jonathan Stupar won the Heisman…while playing in the NFL!
Meredith needs to remain the starter at right tackle. Nothing against Jonathan Scott, but even if he’s healthy this week, continuity up front is paramount.
Are you saying Meredith played better? Or as a group they played better so he should stay in?
I’ve never put a whole lot of stock in continuity; I’d prefer the best 5 out there and let continuity grow from that. If Meredith is that guy, or has the potential to be considerably better than Scott, go with him.
I’m curious as to how Ron rates Meredith.
But as a whole against the Jets they were still well below what you want in an OL. The expectations are just so low that mediocrity looks good right now.
im looking forward to Ron's report even moreso than usual because my non-noticing Meredith makes me excited
It’d be really cool if we had 4 supertalented young OL heading into next year. Especially if Butler comes back and Meredith can go back to studying for a bit.
I remember talking about this when we picked him up, but wasn’t Jamon pretty well-regarded until just before the draft, then fell like a rock?
Jonathan Stupar won the Heisman…while playing in the NFL!
Exactly, the fact Meredith played a whole game and I barely noticed him at all is a very good sign regarding this oline
I think he needs to stay in, we know what we got in Chambers and Scott, Meredith is still really young as an NFL player and if he keeps getting better each week, then we need to keep him out there and grow him as a player.
As my mother once said, common sense isn't as common as it should be, I'm looking at you Fewell, common sense says to play UP on the line against the slant.
Good post. Brian
I agree 100% about letting the o line play together for better or worse. Hopefully the extra playing time together will allow them to build some continuity
Rrrawrrrr, rrrawrrr like a dungeon dragon-Busta Ryhmes
It will be interesting to see what they do with Meredith playing against Peppers this week. I would prefer him to Scott based on supposed talent.
I love the picture at the top of this thing.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
Peppers will line up across from Bell. It will be Tyler Brayton with Everette Brown sprinkled in against Meredith.
I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute
Brown vs Meredith......
I just felt a disturbance in the force…..K is that you or Ron from NM ???
Poor ball security leads to very painful outcomes
I ate meatloaf earlier
so that was probably me
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Tell me about it.....I tried some of that garlic sauce that comes with Pappa John's pizzas
WTF is in that stuff? Took me 3 beers and a bag of Chili Cheese Fritos to cleanse my pallet. And, I know I am going to pay for it later on…..may have to sleep on the coach out of courtesy to my wife :-)
Poor ball security leads to very painful outcomes
The weird garlic butter sauce?
Yeah, not a huge fan
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by 















