Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Bills need to get back to basics offensively

After starting the season with two strong performances in New England and Tampa Bay, the offense of the Buffalo Bills has stunk in consecutive losses to New Orleans and Miami.  Outscored 65-17 in those two losses, Buffalo's offense has generated a meager 10 points and many more mistakes in playing the Bills out of two winnable games.

If there's one team that could cure some of Buffalo's ills offensively (if only for one game), it's the Cleveland Browns.  Buffalo's Week 5 opponent currently possess the dubious honor of being the NFL's worst defense, surrendering 403 yards per game in their 0-4 start.  Granted, their opponents are a sparkling 14-2 early this season (they've played Minnesota, Denver, Baltimore and Cincinnati), but bad is bad no matter which way you look at it.

How can Buffalo take advantage of a poor opponent and get back into rhythm offensively? It's pretty simple: get back to basics.  Run the ball early and often.  Run to set up the pass.  The Bills have employed the opposite theory early in games, and it's putting too much pressure on Trent Edwards and Buffalo's offensive line.

Star-divide

First, some history and current perspective
It wasn't that long ago that Buffalo played Cleveland; most of you remember the second of three gut-wrenching Monday Night Football losses, this one a 29-27 decision in Week 11 of 2008 at Ralph Wilson Stadium.  Buffalo came out firing in that game.  Edwards threw passes on four of his team's first five offensive snaps, with two of those throws intercepted.  He'd add another later on in the first quarter to put Buffalo in a big early hole.

Once that was out of the way, Buffalo's offense settled in nicely - because they mercifully decided to start exploiting a weak Browns run defense by getting the ball to Marshawn Lynch and Fred Jackson.  (Rocket science, right?)  Lynch and Jackson had huge games, combining for 179 rushing yards on 35 carries (5.1 yards per carry).  Lynch added 10 receptions (this was the night "Captain Checkdown" was born, if you recall) for 58 yards and a touchdown.

In short, Buffalo's offense had a respectable evening because, too little too late, they decided to exploit Cleveland's poor defense the way any team that employed a coordinator with two eyes would have: run the ball and set up the pass that way - not vice versa.  Edwards had a poor night, but he played well enough to win once the offensive philosophy was adjusted.

Cleveland is no different this season.  They've got the No. 31-ranked run defense in the NFL, surrendering 177 rushing yards per game on the season.  For perspective, Buffalo's much-maligned run defense is giving up roughly 25 fewer yards per game.  It should not be a secret where Cleveland is weak this time around - and Buffalo is well-equipped to attack their weakness.

Bills still passing to run despite the evidence
Buffalo currently has the No. 14-ranked rush offense in the league, gaining 111 yards per game on the ground.  The more important stat, however, might be their No. 7 ranking in yards per rush; Buffalo is averaging a well-above-respectable 4.8 yards per carry this season.

The fact, therefore, that the Bills continue to throw the football early in football games is baffling - even if that strategy has likely aided in such strong statistical output from the run game.

In four games this season, Buffalo reached the ten-run plateau within each game just once before hitting the same milestone in passes.  In New England, Edwards dropped back to pass 17 times before Jackson logged his tenth rush.  He threw it 21 times before Jackson's tenth run against New Orleans - clearly their biggest abandonment of the run this season.  11 more passes were thrown before a Bills RB carried ten times in Miami.  Only against Tampa Bay did they hit ten runs before they hit ten passes (they'd thrown it seven times when Jackson logged his tenth carry).

Add that up.  That's 56 passes to 40 runs early in football games.  Perhaps the absence of Lynch to suspension was partially behind letting Edwards throw early, but that certainly wasn't the case when Edwards came out firing against Cleveland on MNF.  Passing to set up the run is not characteristic of Buffalo Bills football - and despite the fact that Buffalo's young O-Line is far superior at opening up running lanes than they are at forming a pocket for Edwards, the Bills continue to throw early.  That needs to change.

Get back to basics vs. Cleveland
Offensive coordinators exist to identify, game plan for and exploit the weaknesses of their opponents.  That's the best way to score points, is it not? (I'm boring myself stating the obvious here, so I apologize if you, too, are letting your thoughts wander.)

Cleveland's run defense is not good.  In order to effectively stop the run - particularly a running game as proficient as Buffalo's - they'll need to commit extra defenders, because their front seven has been well below average.  The Bills clearly have the weapons to make plays in the deep passing game if extra defenders are in the box.  But those defenders won't be in the short area if Buffalo continues its bizarre tendency to throw early and often in football games.

Run the ball early - you've got two backs to wear down opponents now.  Get the defense to commit, then beat them over the top.  Buffalo is extremely capable of doing that on any given week, but particularly this week - even with an inconsistent-at-best offensive line.  Get back to basics, and this offense can go places.  All it'll take is a smart game plan.  If Buffalo can't find ways to gain yards and score points against this defense, then the problem is far more serious than probably many of us imagined.

0 recs  |  Comment 68 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I agree all the way, it has baffled me that they start the game off in shotgun, I feel like they should run first and then work in the pass, it will make them less predictable I feel

by Mdiddy007 on Oct 8, 2009 11:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Brilliant

Maybe we can actually get the ball to our WRs if they start stacking the box against the run.

"Next time I get the opportunity I am going to hold on and make a better decision." ~ Leodis McKelvin. (Can't ask for anythitng more than that)

by NolaBillsFan on Oct 8, 2009 11:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

revolutionary!

run to set up the pass….seriously though, this offense has so many warts. I want an identity, and that identity should be lynch/jackson. T.O. and Lee will open up if we successfully work our run game. Then when we do start to drop back on 3rd downs, they’ll bring the heat and should open it up in the passing game.

I expect a blowout win this week. A loss or a close win and I’ll be really disappointed

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Oct 8, 2009 11:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I plan on recording this game

and rewatching it every Sunday. That way, it will feel like the Bills are have a good season…..unless they lose…..dam, back to the drawing board.

Poor ball security leads to very painful outcomes

by Joe P. on Oct 8, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

get ya cryin' towel ready

we’ll be lucky if we beat cleveland. even after they lost edwards and winslow. i’m just hoping royal doesn’t have a 7-8 catch game, that i couldn’t handle

Starting a movement to draft Jimmy Clausen in april, he'll be the 2nd coming of Kelly, the saviour of the Bills

by J. Mackin on Oct 8, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Royal

is certainally due for a big game.

"Next time I get the opportunity I am going to hold on and make a better decision." ~ Leodis McKelvin. (Can't ask for anythitng more than that)

by NolaBillsFan on Oct 8, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and a big fumble.

by XtrmeCarnage82 on Oct 8, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They'd have to throw at him 14-15 times

to make 7-8 catches

"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"

by willgarr15 on Oct 8, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kinda like TO

by Slick Shifty on Oct 8, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wouldn’t know, they haven’t thrown to him 15 times all year

Starting a movement to draft Jimmy Clausen in april, he'll be the 2nd coming of Kelly, the saviour of the Bills

by J. Mackin on Oct 8, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, I think they have and I think he has 8 catches…

by Slick Shifty on Oct 9, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and those 7-8 catches

translate to 3-4 fumbles

by freddyjj on Oct 8, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Marv Levy

I believe it was he who stated:

“In order to win in the NFL you have to run and stop the run. Nothing has changed.”

by Michael_Necci on Oct 8, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Amazing. Before the Miami game, all the noise was about getting TO and Lee Evans more involved and taking shots down the field. Now we’re being told the cure is to pound the ball with more running plays. Personally, I think the Bills O has had the most success when they take time to set up and execute screen passes.

most of my posts get deleted :(

by dzil on Oct 8, 2009 12:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The point isn’t to pound the run. It’s to pound the run early to make it easier to get those shots to Owens and Evans downfield.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Oct 8, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

run – run – then run some more.

that’s how it should be – wear their defense down, let our d rest and control the line of scrimmage. that’s how you win games.

we all like seeing a passing attack – but if we can run ourselves to victory then i’m a happy man.

I am so clever that sometimes I don’t understand a single word of what I am saying
Trent Edwards - Backup QB until furthur notice. Care to prove me wrong Trent?

by J2 on Oct 8, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sounds like Steeler (SB Champs) football to me!

They are hard to play but not hard to beat.
- Mike Lombardi on the Buffalo Bills

by Sluss88 on Oct 8, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its what the Phins blasted us with last week

Pound the rock, toss the ball when needed and just hold the ball till you score by beating the other team up to the point they can’t stop you

As my mother once said, common sense isn't as common as it should be, I'm looking at you Fewell, common sense says to play UP on the line against the slant.

by WABillsfan on Oct 8, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The point isn’t to pound the run. It’s to pound the run early to make it easier to get those shots to Owens and Evans downfield.

That may be your point Brian, but I agree with da dzil. Did AVP not say when he came on that he would go with what was working. Personally, I don’t care if Owens or Evans catch one more ball the rest of the season. The point of the game is to win. I haven’t seen all of the games, but from what I understand, and have read, the screen was working in New England. Am I mistaken? Did it stop working, or did we move away from it?

by KTyczka on Oct 8, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

I’m sick of hearing about getting the ball to TO and Evans. I don’t care if they don’t catch any passes, as long as the Bills get a W. News flash: we can run the football well. Do it. And maybe try ligning up under center a few times this week. The best way to get a young, inexperienced line feeling good about themselves is to run the ball, like they did against NE. Run, run, run. Lynch, Jackson, Omon, hell even McIntyre. Just run the damn football! The best way to throw deep (like to TO and Evans, our so-called biggest problem) is play-action (like the Mannings do in their respective cities).

"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"

by willgarr15 on Oct 8, 2009 12:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who's McIntyre???

haha

They are hard to play but not hard to beat.
- Mike Lombardi on the Buffalo Bills

by Sluss88 on Oct 8, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no kidding, why is that guy still around? if we don’t use a fullback, and we’re three deep at RB….

by quantumuprising on Oct 8, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently he’s good on special teams. Although you bring up a good point, why don’t we try using a fullback?

"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"

by willgarr15 on Oct 8, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don’t want to give this guy too much exposure.

by Zumone on Oct 8, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m fine with them not using a fullback. That’s the approach of the no huddle.

But if you’re not going to use one, then why have one?

by quantumuprising on Oct 8, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly!

They are hard to play but not hard to beat.
- Mike Lombardi on the Buffalo Bills

by Sluss88 on Oct 8, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This all sounds good against Cleveland.

We still have to do this without Schoman and Butler. Having Bell back for this game is a plus, but then again we are playing Cleveland. This game is so close to looking into a mirror and playing against ourselves. Home field advantage will be a huge factor.

Excuses are a sign of weakness!!!!!!

by VanScottM on Oct 8, 2009 1:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I really hope the team isn’t looking past Cleveland as gimme game.

"Next time I get the opportunity I am going to hold on and make a better decision." ~ Leodis McKelvin. (Can't ask for anythitng more than that)

by NolaBillsFan on Oct 8, 2009 1:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Cleveland might be looking at us as a gimmie game.

oops, did i say that?

by quantumuprising on Oct 8, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree with this.

Yes you need to run in the NFL but this team needs to show some explosivness in the offense they are not good enough or built to win games 17 – 14 especially in our division. TE and AVP need to take this lesser oponent and show the rest of the NFL that we can get the ball down the middle of the field and we will take chances, instead of dumping it down to the backs on a regular basis.
Yes we play Cleveland on Sun. and yes we need a win but we play in the AFC East where at least 2 of the 3 teams have shown they can score efficently and all have better than average defenses. Plus by doing this it will open up more running lanes. Take the kid gloves off and play some entertaining football. If we beat Cleveland 20 -3 and rush for 200 yds. evryone is going to think things are all better until we play a real defense like next week against the Jets. I would think they would want to show everything so the Jets need to prepare for it.

On a side note does anybody know how James Hardy is doing? I know he is on the PUP list but I have not heard his name mentioned once and we are getting close to week 6 when that decision is supposed to be made.

by Honestabe75 on Oct 8, 2009 1:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

My point wasn’t “run and JUST run.” It was “run to make making the explosive plays easier.”

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Oct 8, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I undrestand I just respectively disagree. I would like to see them “make explosive plays so the run, screens and draws are easier”

by Honestabe75 on Oct 8, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

both are right. the problem is, one of those approaches needs to be successful for the other to work. right now, neither are.

by quantumuprising on Oct 8, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

People that was our game plan against Miami

It blew up in our face. Miami was a run stop team, we were suppose to beat them with the intermediate and long pass. We ended up playing field position with them until TE’s pick six. That is not the way to go. We made Miami look good last week that way. Eventually our defense made them look better. Henne moved the ball like a seasoned pro, and we couldn’t stop the run.

Excuses are a sign of weakness!!!!!!

by VanScottM on Oct 8, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Miami has a far superior defense to Cleveland.

Official ledge-talker-offer of the Buffalo Bills.

by WhyBillsWhy on Oct 8, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeek don’t be so sure. maybe a better run defense, but miami’s pass defense had been gashed before our game. we made their secondary look all-world.

by quantumuprising on Oct 8, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What Draws

we have only seen a few draws the entire year, all from shotgun.

There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.

by The Buffalo Kid on Oct 8, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why are we not running a 2 tailback system?

i’ve blogged before about running a formation with evans, owens, nelson, lynch and jackson. nelson can be used in the slot as 3rd wr, can line up at te(i know he has some blocking issues, but it’s better then nothing), even line him up in the back field and put jackson at slot for a change of pace. put lynch on the line in a 2 te, 2wr, 1rb look. put our best talent on offense on the field at the same time. they can’t cover everyone. the opposition will have to constantly try and figure out who the handoff is going to, trying to adjust to 2 different running styles without being able to substiute personel.

Starting a movement to draft Jimmy Clausen in april, he'll be the 2nd coming of Kelly, the saviour of the Bills

by J. Mackin on Oct 8, 2009 1:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

We ran a pretty substantial amount of 2-back last week.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Oct 8, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I saw it a whole bunch, and I don’t exactly remember it being that productive.

by quantumuprising on Oct 8, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

more for protection so we could pass.

Excuses are a sign of weakness!!!!!!

by VanScottM on Oct 8, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

really?

jackson only had 9 carrys and lynch had 8, 8 grabs between the 2 of them. maybe we can try running it effectively. get a little creative, put jackson in the slot, lynch at te. jackson outside with owens in the slot, something, anything

Starting a movement to draft Jimmy Clausen in april, he'll be the 2nd coming of Kelly, the saviour of the Bills

by J. Mackin on Oct 8, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All out of the Shotgun

We have not seen a 2 back set the entire year with Trent under center which takes away so much when it used ONLY in the shotgun.

Effective Play Action
Effective Misdirection.
Effective Draws.

It is pure lunacy to only use it out of the Shotgun.

The Bills easily have one of the most predictible offenses for defenses to gameplan for off film.

There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.

by The Buffalo Kid on Oct 8, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and start putting owens in the slot on some plays

if we have to deal with the captian at qb, why are they not lining owens up in the slot on 15% of the plays and let him check down to owens? Maybe if they double owens in the slot on a 5yd slant or curl, it’ll open up someone down field….though i think edwards needs an eye exam, i don’t think he can see more then 15 yd down field

Starting a movement to draft Jimmy Clausen in april, he'll be the 2nd coming of Kelly, the saviour of the Bills

by J. Mackin on Oct 8, 2009 2:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Its been mentioned before – trent just simply does not throw the slant well at all. The times hes tried this year have ended up in incompletions and i think two picks.

by quantumuprising on Oct 8, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

k

then 6 or 9 routes.

Starting a movement to draft Jimmy Clausen in april, he'll be the 2nd coming of Kelly, the saviour of the Bills

by J. Mackin on Oct 8, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

try it off play action.

The linebackers aren’t really playing the run much when the Bills are in shotgun.

Thats why Trent is having problems over the middle. Extra linebackers to throw around. Put him under center, play action, and I bet it works.

There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.

by The Buffalo Kid on Oct 8, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh yeah 1 last thing quantum

both those picks came out of the shotgun. That’s the lunacy of using the Shotgun so much. Linebackers can heat and play the run softer and the pass more agressively in coverage over the middle.

There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.

by The Buffalo Kid on Oct 8, 2009 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

in the offseason

a lot of people were complaining that there was no way we would pass more than run this year even though we should. Now eveyrone wants to run again. Its easy to keep criticizing when we keep waffling on what we want this team to do (and no Brian that statement isnt targeting your article). You all want to know why we are 1-3? Our offensive line is the worst in football. Thats it. It was decent with Butler in, passable with Bell in, and down right atrocious with them both out. We need to sign Runyan or Jones NOW! Then we can pass and run however the hell wed like.

We got your back Leodis!

by poz on Oct 8, 2009 2:03 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

don't forget Schouman

Derrick Schouman brought more to this team than most admit. Remember G’s comments, I got to believe him, it has shown true as well. Runyan and Jones, the Bills haven’t signed them, because of the same reason nobody else has signed them. Along with the fact that they are probably not a no huddle fit. Those two players are more of a pain being unsigned then they were being on a team.

Excuses are a sign of weakness!!!!!!

by VanScottM on Oct 8, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think run first was more of a comment for this game, since CLE's D can't stop the run.

That doesn’t necessarily mean we should be a run first offense every game.

They are hard to play but not hard to beat.
- Mike Lombardi on the Buffalo Bills

by Sluss88 on Oct 8, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

might be the last straw i can find to hold onto – but i think the o-line is going to get better and better as the season progresses. wood and levitre will be very, very good in time. hang is solid. losing butler hurts, yes – but if scott has his head on right, i have faith he’ll continue to get better. he was drafted a couple spots before butler, after all. so maybe the skill set is there. bell just needs reps.
its bleak right now, but the foundation is very much there for a dominant o-line.

by LeClaireBill on Oct 8, 2009 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly

If they can run effectively, great do it. If they can pass effectively, great do it. I just want to see something that works.

"Next time I get the opportunity I am going to hold on and make a better decision." ~ Leodis McKelvin. (Can't ask for anythitng more than that)

by NolaBillsFan on Oct 8, 2009 2:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

As Brian pointed out in the article...

The Browns first 4 opponents are a combined 14-2. That works out to 10-2, not figuring in the head to head matchups with the Browns).

Conversely, the Bills first 4 opponents are a combined 8-8. That works out to 5-7, not figuring in the head to head matchups with the Bills).

Looking at it this way, the Bills seem to be struggling more than the Browns.

I’d love to see 20 carries for Lynch and Jackson. Try and stop ’em Cleveland!

Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.

by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 8, 2009 2:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Your math skills amaze me!

"Next time I get the opportunity I am going to hold on and make a better decision." ~ Leodis McKelvin. (Can't ask for anythitng more than that)

by NolaBillsFan on Oct 8, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HAH!

I can honestly say that’s the first time anyone’s ever said that to me. I’m a writer, so math isn’t my strong suit (well all math that isn’t physics related).

Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.

by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 8, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What about the basics of Our Offense Vs a 3-4 Defense?

Didn’t we prove we can’t play against a 3-4 defense in the past. So basically, we have to get pretty technical against a 3-4 defense to be successful. Never mind, I am confusing myself.

Excuses are a sign of weakness!!!!!!

by VanScottM on Oct 8, 2009 3:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, considering how dominant we were running the ball against Cleveland’s 3-4 last season, isn’t that kind of moot?

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Oct 8, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually Brian, I think it only proves Cleveland’s 3-4 was kinda’ poop.

Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.

by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 8, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except for the U.S.S Ronald Reagan in the middle there. We might need to use the whole offensive line on him.

by quantumuprising on Oct 8, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Considering the final score.

Wasn’t really enough either. I hate talking negative about my team, I really do. I agree with the post, emphasize on the basics, but in the NFL that only gets you so far. I agree we need to run the ball well to be successful. Also, we will need to stop it and we will earn the W.

Excuses are a sign of weakness!!!!!!

by VanScottM on Oct 8, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Either way, the 3-4 argument is irrelevant this week.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Oct 8, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know if it is. Edwards has a terrible time diagnosing the scheme. If they continue to rely on the pass, I see the argument as completely relevant.

Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.

by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 8, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As you do "I Hope So"

Excuses are a sign of weakness!!!!!!

by VanScottM on Oct 8, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thinking it’ll be irrelevant in 3 weeks as well

Starting a movement to draft Jimmy Clausen in april, he'll be the 2nd coming of Kelly, the saviour of the Bills

by J. Mackin on Oct 8, 2009 4:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Penalties kill us

That’s why the running game gets hung up,I think..The small stuff like that kills more drives and makes it almost impossible to run the ball effectively..With Scott back at RT,I hope we see fewer penalties and that should help the run game..It seems like as soon as Freddy starts to get into a rhythm,the penalties put the first down markers out of reach..If they fix that,it sounds like we may have a shot at playing a much better game..

by FanFromThe80s on Oct 8, 2009 6:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
How long did it take Shanahan to win 2 straight Super Bowls after
Billsjaguars_small
Draft Order: Week 10 - Bills pick 6th
Thebestteameverred_medium_medium_small
We need to go LT
Small
To cheer, or not to cheer
Billsmagnetsquare_small
Draft confusion (and a poem! :D)
Small
Any relevent feedback would be nice
Nfl-toronto_small
some thoughts
Images_small
Bills Quarterbacks
279px-buffalo_bills_logo_svg_small
To be or Not to be?
T_edwards_070930_gallery_600_1__small
The 1st Thing Buffalo Should Do This Offseason

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Editor-in-Chief

Ronswanson_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Billsjaguars_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Nfl-toronto_small kaisertown