Bills Fantasy Friday: Week 5 Start 'Em/Sit 'Em
It's Friday. You're getting ready to set your fantasy football lineups for the weekend. If you're looking for fantasy starters in this coming weekend's matchup between the Buffalo Bills and the Cleveland Browns - well, you're in trouble. But we'll cover your bases for you anyways.
Kurupt usually does this feature, but this week, he's passed the buck to me as he is quite ill. Yes, Kurupt is a solid fantasy player, and I'd rather take advice from him myself - but you're in good hands. I don't quite know how to put this, but... I'm kind of a big deal. Seven-time fantasy champ here. But yeah, I still wouldn't blame you if you asked Kurupt in the comments section what he'd do, because the [insert vulgar insult] has beaten me out for the championship two years running.
Who are you starting out of this Bills/Browns game? Find out after the jump. By the way - for advice from all of SB Nation's NFL bloggers, be sure to check out sbnation.com/fantasy throughout the day today.
Quarterbacks
Trent Edwards - Edwards was a fringe fantasy starter at QB (and he was definitely there in two-QB leagues) after two strong games to start the season. In his last two games... not so much. Edwards has thrown four interceptions in Buffalo's last two losses (to just one touchdown), and he's averaging a paltry 174 yards per game. But you're thinking "Uh, Brian, it's Cleveland!", right? Well, Trent got picked off three times in a single quarter by those ever-stingy Browns last season. Buffalo will have chances to make big plays through the air this week, but considering Edwards' recent struggles, I wouldn't touch him with a ten-foot pole. Sit 'Em
Derek Anderson - Well, let's see here. Anderson actually had a passable game last week against Cincinnati, throwing for 269 yards and a score (with a pick) in an overtime loss to Cincinnati. He's got a good offensive line in front of him, too. But for all of Buffalo's shortcomings defensively, their pass rush and their overall pass defense have been above acceptable. Cleveland historically struggles on the road, too. Oh, and did I mention that the Browns traded away Anderson's favorite receiving target this week? Sit 'Em
Running Backs
Fred Jackson - He'll remain Buffalo's "starting" running back for the foreseeable future. He'll see a lot of playing time. But his workload will undoubtedly be reduced now that a certain suspended running back is no longer suspended. Jackson has been a fantasy mainstay early in the season; while he may be slipping from that status, he's got a good matchup this weekend, and is a must-start in PPR leagues. Start 'Em in PPR, Consider as Flex in all other leagues
Marshawn Lynch - His return to the lineup came at the cost of a fully effective Jackson, with less than a yard per carry from Lynch himself, and two moderate gains in the receiving game. Lynch looked very rusty in last week's loss to Miami, but he has a chance to kick it into a higher gear now that he's got a game and two weeks' worth of practices under his belt. Still, Buffalo has tended to go with the hot hand in the past, so if Jackson gets hot, Lynch might not see the field. Sit 'Em, but only for now
Jamal Lewis - He's missed two straight games, and only had 95 rushing yards in the first two games of the season. He's been limited in two consecutive days of practice this week, and may miss a third straight game. Even if he plays, he's not a great fantasy play - Buffalo contained him a year ago, and Lewis has competition for carries now. Sit 'Em
Jerome Harrison - In his fourth year out of Washington State, Harrison is finally seeing significant playing time in Cleveland. He's had a couple of solid, productive weeks in a row, accumulating 237 yards for an anemic Browns offense. Let's not forget, either, that Harrison's only NFL touchdown came last year against Buffalo on a long gainer - and that Buffalo's defense has been putrid. Don't expect monster numbers (even though you might get them), but Harrison is actually a solid play this week. Start 'Em in PPR, Consider as Flex in all other leagues
Wide Receivers
Terrell Owens - No matter what his stats look like, Owens is a must-play every week, because the man is a playmaker. If Buffalo is smart, they'll focus on the ground game and opening up play-action, which plays to Owens' strengths. Start 'Em
Lee Evans - For the same reasons as Owens, Evans has a chance to make big plays this week. He has yet to shake the label of "maddeningly inconsistent fantasy option," however. If you have more consistent options, by all means throw them into the lineup ahead of Evans. If you don't... well, Evans has certainly had worse matchups. Word of warning: Evans had a whopping zero receptions against the Browns last season. Sit 'Em unless you can't
Josh Reed - Weeks like last week, when he scored a touchdown, are incredibly rare for Reed. Sit 'Em
Joshua Cribbs - Hasn't done much of anything as a receiver this season, but his opportunities will jump up now that Braylon Edwards has been traded to New York. Still, he's not a good play until Cleveland proves that they're using Cribbs as their top target - and given the next guy on our list, that's unlikely to ever happen. Sit 'Em
Mohamed Massaquoi - Had a bit of a break-out game last week with 8 catches for 148 yards against Cincinnati. Right now, he appears to be Anderson's favorite target - but that could spell doom for Cleveland, as teams will focus on taking him away. Still, he has the hot hand right now. Sit 'Em unless you can't
Chansi Stuckey - Stuckey comes over from New York in the Edwards trade. He's got a familiarity with Browns coach Eric Mangini, but that's about all he's got going for him right now. Sit 'Em
Tight Ends
Derek Fine - If a TE that can catch 5 passes for 40 yards, and then drop three more, is your key to fantasy dominance, then start Derek Fine this week. Sit 'Em
Shawn Nelson - Someday, Buffalo will find ways to get him more looks in their offense. Of course, they need to get Owens and Evans more looks first, so Nelson is a virtual non-factor for the foreseeable future. Sit 'Em
Robert Royal - ... next. Sit 'Em
Steve Heiden - ... never mind. Sit 'Em
Kickers
Rian Lindell - He's a strong option this week, considering how putrid Buffalo's offense is and how terrible Cleveland's defense is. When putrid offenses meet terrible defenses, field goals ensue. Start 'Em
Billy Cundiff - Rejoice, Bills fans, for Bill-killer Phil Dawson is injured! Well, don't rejoice about the injury; that's rude. Just rejoice that he won't kill the Bills this week, as he's done in successive seasons. Cundiff? Not exactly fantasy gold, and I'm predicting that Cleveland's offense will look bad this week. Sit 'Em
Defenses
I won't even separate this out. Both of these defenses have been awful. Both are capable of picking up a few sacks and maybe a turnover or two, but they're unreliable at best. Sit 'Em
Sleepers
Jerome Harrison - I'm telling you, he's going to have a strong week. Buffalo loves to force offenses to check down to runners, and the Bills have already proven that they struggle some with speed backs. At a minimum, Harrison will have an OK week. His fantasy potential is through the roof.
Nobody from Buffalo - I don't think it's likely that any of the Bills' role players will have good production this week. Stick to the big guns.
0 recs |
76 comments
|
Comments
I expect a big week out of the Bills D this week. Starting them.
by Buffalo Mo on Oct 9, 2009 9:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A healthy Bills D I’d agree. A Bills D without Poz, Whitner, Scott, McKelvin and Byrd. Not such a good idea.
by Berg79 on Oct 9, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
After getting dumped on as hard as they did last week – something goods gonna happen.
by Buffalo Mo on Oct 9, 2009 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m only looking for “nothing worse than last week” right now.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 9, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I finally pulled the trigger and dropped Lee for Braylon.
just as you said, too inconsistant. I think Braylon will be huge in NY in a couple of weeks. I’ve just got 1 question this week. Which 2 wr’s should I start out of the 3, Roddy White vs SF, Sidney Rice vs Det, or Percy Harvin vs Det.
by dragonwag0n on Oct 9, 2009 9:21 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
I’d start Harvin for sure, because he has added value as a returner and a Wildcat runner. He’s really, really good, and as a Harvin owner myself, he’s been pretty dependable for me this season.
Roddy White is a must-start any week, IMO.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Oct 9, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Favre seems to have quite the connection with Harvin too. I would definaltely go with him.
"Well, I’m always hungry and it’s time to eat" - Lynch
by bflo on Oct 9, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seems that Favre is developing chemistry with Rice as well. Tough call between those two. Roddy White is a must start, but SF’s pass D is tough…
"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"
by willgarr15 on Oct 9, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Only 4 Start’ems in this whole thing. Tells you how bad both teams are.
No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.
by sireric on Oct 9, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lynch
I decided yesterday to start Lynch on everyteam I have him on. This morning Mr. Roto has him as a must start in his Fantasy blog on ESPN.com
Why not Bobby April?
by nickdaniels on Oct 9, 2009 9:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I've fixed my problem
I’ve traded all my Bills players in both my fantasy leagues except for Freddy in one of my leagues. Although he now has much less value now that Marshawn is back. I use him as my flex so that his catches count.
In my other league we play with defensive players (DT, DE, LB, CB) and I have had great success with Stroud.
Either believe in your team or don’t coach it
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Oct 9, 2009 10:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’ve been proposed the following trade, let me know what you all think I should do:
I’ll give up: Tom Brady, Fred Jackson
I’ll receive: Jay Cutler, Cedric Benson
I realize on straight points so far, that this makes sounds sense for me. But I’m afraid as soon as I dump Brady, he’ll go all 2007 Brady on everything. It should also be noted that I have Flacco on my team as well, and Brady has been riding the pine.
"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"
by willgarr15 on Oct 9, 2009 11:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Boy, I’d keep Brady. The Pats have some cake games coming up, and they’ll only continue to get better themselves. When Brady is Brady, he’s the best player in fantasy football, period.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Oct 9, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know about that statment. I’d take Peyton over Brady if I had the choice between the two. I fudged up this year with quarterbacks with Cutler and Romo.
by dragonwag0n on Oct 9, 2009 12:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Lots of things to consider on this deal. First, what is the scoring system. Is it a ppr? If it is a ppr then Jackson is close to Benson and the deal doesn’t make too much sense as Benson has only 6 catches (I think) on the season. 2nd, how many points per passing td…4 or 6. 3rd, what is your starting lineup like 2 or 3 RBs. Who else do you have. 4th, your record.
Ultimately, this on the surface is a fair deal. AND go look at the Bengals week 15 and 16 matchups. If I’m not mistaken they are fairly weak which could lead to good playoff scores for Benson. Overall, I wouldn’t strongly consider this deal if you have a good record and are not in a ppr league.
by Berg79 on Oct 9, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not ppr so Jackson is losing value for me with Lynch back, I am 4-0 so far, 6 pts for TDs all around, 2 rbs and I have been using Thomas Jones with Glenn Coffee/Jackson so far. I also have Bush and Choice on the bench. So I could use some RB help, but have been maximizing some matchups to squeak out to a fast start.
"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"
by willgarr15 on Oct 9, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are 4-0 so the playoffs are a strong possibility. Week 15 and 16 Benson plays the Chargers and Chiefs which are both awful at stopping the run. In a non-ppr league I would pull the trigger. It won’t matter if you get in as the last seed or the top seed everything is even when/if you make the playoffs.
I believe Benson is a top 15 RB in a non-ppr format. You will be fine with Cutler and Flacco.
by Berg79 on Oct 9, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Berg
"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"
by willgarr15 on Oct 9, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No problem. I write for a fantasy website as sort of my side gig and am in 8 leagues so I am definetely a fantasy football geek.
I have Benson in both my non-ppr league and 1/3 ppr league.
by Berg79 on Oct 9, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know
but the Bears and Ravens also have a pretty soft schedule remaining although the Ravens do have the Steelers twice and Minn once, and the Bears have Minnesota twice and GB once more. But they only play tough opponents the same week on 2 occasions.
"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"
by willgarr15 on Oct 9, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Purple Jesus and Ronnie Brown are my 1-2 punch...
but do I start Fred Jackson or Rashard Mendenhall as my flex?
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 9, 2009 12:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, this.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Oct 9, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tried to steal him in our league, but K got him. He grabbed Mendenhall and SF D this week. I’d say he’s rounding into form now.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 9, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah K needs a life. I think he spends all of his time on FleaFlicker.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Oct 9, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, he wasn’t stolen. He was sitting on the FA list waiting for me to pick him back up. And I had SF’s D last week for their 44 point outburst!
You are all in big trouble
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Oct 9, 2009 3:24 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I use “steal” in the sense that you bought low.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 9, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just dumped Mendenhall in favor of Cadillac Williams. I had both Pit runners and their stats were horrible.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 10, 2009 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
who to start
I can start any combo of 4 between running back and wide receivers. I have so far as my starting running backs steven jackson and lynch and for wide receivers tj hous and andre johnson. I read the bills/ browns start or sit them and saw that lynch was a sit for now. My other wr I could start besides lynch is torry holt for jax against seattle. what do u think I should do.
by bills21 on Oct 9, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lynch. Holt is the number 2 receiving option in Jax and the number 3 overall option in Jax.
by Berg79 on Oct 9, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes. Exactly.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 10, 2009 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what do u think about getting fred jackson
A person in the league I am in dropped fred jackson so the league rules is nobody could get him this week should I get him in week six.
by bills21 on Oct 9, 2009 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
what do u think about pierre garcon
should I get him and get rid of torry holt
by bills21 on Oct 9, 2009 2:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Holt is useless
Get Sims-Walker if he’s still available
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Oct 9, 2009 3:20 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
If Sims-Walker is still available...
you should be dominating your league because obviously no one else is paying attention!
"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"
by willgarr15 on Oct 9, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I picked him up on Monday. :-) He’s starting this week for me.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 10, 2009 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so for fred jackson I could drop possibly devery henderson
and also is it bad to have two running backs of the same team.
by bills21 on Oct 9, 2009 2:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What is your scoring system? PPR? I happen to like Henderson if I had to pick I would drop Henderson for Jackson.
by Berg79 on Oct 9, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I got fred jackson I would have no rb for week 9 because my running backs are steven jackson lynch and then fred jackson.
by bills21 on Oct 9, 2009 2:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don’t worry about week 9. A lot can happen in between. But you should have more than 3 Rb’s on your roster.
by Berg79 on Oct 9, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
or Jerome Harrison
I already have Brian Westbrook Starting
by tpsabres on Oct 9, 2009 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yikes. You’re hurting at RB this week. I think Harrison is your best play, even including Westbrook. If you have a McCoy handcuff, start him instead – PHI will blow out TB, and the Eagles will limit Westbrook’s touches to keep him healthy.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Oct 9, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My order
1. Westbrook (They say he got healthy over the bye…historically good after bye weeks)
2. Harrison : Bills have no LB’s
3. J. Jones: Jax D is really weak but it’s close to Jackson
4. Fred Jackson: Pure split backfield
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm screwed this week
I had Eli as my back up QB, I dropped him for Delhomme.
I have Garcon, Cotchery, Massaquoi as receivers and Choice and Jonathan Stewart. I had Gore and Felix Jones who are hurt, and Forte is bye-ing along with Rodgers. I have Nate Washington on my bench and Eddie Royal is an FA in my league.
Should I drop Massaquoi and play Washington? Should I keep Delhomme or get Eli back, bad heel and all?
I’m 3-1 but I’m not looking forward to this week. BTW, I traded TO for Cotchery and happy about it.
by Ono on Oct 9, 2009 7:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A bad Eli is worth a thousand Delhommes. Eli Manning is a legit fantasy QB, and he’s on the mend fast. I’d make that move yesterday! I wouldn’t bother with Royal, but Washington is an interesting option simply because he’s Kerry Collins’ favorite receiver (or seems to be). Also, Washington’s caught touchdowns each of the last two weeks. Good move to trade TO for Cotchery. I’ve had JC on my team since day one and as Sanchez’ favorite go-to-guy, he’s brought me nothing but production (I’m 4-0). Truth be told, Cotch is turning into a legit No. 1 receiver. I doubt Braylon Edwards will interfere with that.
Good luck!
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
by Dyl on Oct 10, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Nate Washington but not this Week. Indy is good against the pass and Washington got banged up last week even though he will play. I wouldn’t drop Massaquio
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Guys, I need some help this week.
I have Mendenhall at RB and Mike Sims-Walker at WR, I’m not thinking about benching them.
I then have one flex spot and two WR spots for:
Fred Jackson vs. Cleveland
Steve Slaton @ Arizona
Jericho Cotchery @ Miami
Santana Moss @ Carolina
Chad Ochocinco @ Baltimore
Wes Welker @ Denver
It seems like a total crapshoot with the wide receivers. I think Jackson against the Browns is better than Slaton at the Cards, but I can even see arguments the other way there. Is there any player that screams “bench me!” or “start me!” at you?
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
by Dyl on Oct 10, 2009 12:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And then there's Jerome Harrison
against the Bills. I just acquired him.
With Cotchery questionable to play, I’m guessing Jackson, with Moss, and Ochocinco at WR?
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
by Dyl on Oct 10, 2009 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Slaton over Jackson no doubt
I’d go Moss and cotchery
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Oct 10, 2009 11:55 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Slaton no question. Ocho Cinco and Welker. Cotchery is hurt. Moss is a hit or miss player and F. Jackson can’t fill in the WR spot.
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it is a 0 ppr league then I’d consider S. moss over Welker.
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey berg
my scoring system is for throwing
6=td1-9
2=2pt conversion
1= for every 25 yards
5= 300 ?349
7=350 399
10= 400 or more yard
running
6=td 1-9
2 = 2pt conversion
1= for every 10 yards
5= 100? 149 yards
7 = 150? 199 yards
10= 200 or more yards
catching not including te
6= td 1-9
2= 2pt conversion
1= for every 10 yards rec
1= for each catch
5= 100? 149 yards
7= 150? 199 yards
10= 200 or more yards
5= 10+ catches in a game.
there is more for te and defense and special teams. sorry so long.
by bills21 on Oct 10, 2009 12:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What I see it appears you are in a ppr (assuming both rb’s and wr’s get the reception point). Fred Jackson has great value in that league much more than a Henderson. I would get him on your roster immediately.
Sorry not to reply quicker…hadn’t been on rumblings since yest around 5ish.
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
pierre garcon vs tennessee or tj hous versus jacksonville
who would you start I have tj and andre johnson as starters right now but garcon and the colts are playing tennessee. should I keep as is.
by bills21 on Oct 10, 2009 1:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Housh. Jax has a very weak pass D. Hass will play and look for housh and if not seneca Wallace found him 8 times for 100+ yards. I believe all 4 QBs who have played Jax have thrown for 200+ (Warner and Schaub 300+).
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what do you think
In my league I have the giants and washington as my two defenses but I just saw as a free agent defense is the 49 ers. should I drop the redskins and get 49ers.
by bills21 on Oct 10, 2009 1:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes. Only bc you have the Giants. However, the Giants play the Saints in week 6 (when SF in on bye). I would look to grab Jax or Carolina D for a tricky week 6 play and drop the SKins. Car plays TB and Jax plays someone weak too.
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t want to play any D against the Colts or Saints. So Giants should sit on your bench for week 6. Look at matchups pick the best D for week 6 only. Then Giants bye week 10 (I believe) do the same thing. It would be rare you’d ever start the 49ers over the Giants so use week matchups when accessing.
I have the Giants in a bunch of leagues.
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow… a bunch of sit ems….
Trent Edwards is projected to go for 212 yards and 2 TDs this week by Fleaflicker.
Lee will get one of them and 64 yards.
I benched Lee Evans this week in favor of Mike Sims-Walker of the Jags and Steve Smith of the Panthers. Good idea or bad idea? The Jags are playing the Seahawks and Walker has had two very good weeks out of three. Anybody help?
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 10, 2009 9:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sims-Walker has three staright good games
Why you’d even consider starting Evans is beyond me…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Oct 10, 2009 11:57 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 10, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I benched Evans for Sims Walker in a league and it was not a tough decision. Sims Walker is going to be good this year and a fantasy top 20 WR at year end.
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I picked up Kyle Orton just to start this week so Trent didn’t have to play for me. I know I should start Edwards but last year’s game coupled with the last two games leaves me gun shy. I still expect him to do well this week honestly.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 10, 2009 9:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As painful as this is for me to say I would start Edwards v. the Browns over Orton v. the Pats with Mayo returning. ANd if you read my overall comments on Edwards you know where I stand on that.
I might be crazy but I think it is reasonable to expect Edwards to go 200 and 2.
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where’s K’s input on that? Should I start Edwards vs. Browns or Orton vs. Pats?
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 10, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m going to say Edwards as well. The distance between Edwards and Orton is less than the difference between the Browns putrid D and the Patriots’ D. That’s the rationale.
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
by Dyl on Oct 10, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The same putrid D that intercepted him three time in five throws last year?
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 10, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’d start neither. I suppose I’d go with Edwards by default. Is there anyone else available?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Oct 10, 2009 2:58 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Well neither is of course the optimal move
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope the Eagles D goes off!!!! on the Bucs.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Oct 10, 2009 9:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope McNabb goes off on the Bucs. I still wonder if I need to start Matt Ryan or Trent Edwards because of McNabb’s rib injury.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 10, 2009 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Matt Ryan is playing the most underrated D in the NFL this week. McNabb is playing the Bucs. McNabb will play.
by Berg79 on Oct 10, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 























