Realistic changes Bills' offense can make to improve during bye
Brian covered the most obvious changes the Buffalo Bills need to make in his bye-week article, such as improving the O-Line play, but his thoughts got me thinking about some strategic changes we could implement during the bye week to improve our chances on offense.
Now that we've abandoned the no-huddle offense, I don't understand why we're still limiting ourselves to the simplistic play-calling approach that was mandated by that particular scheme. Keeping things simple for the sake of an up-tempo style of play doesn't make sense when you're not playing an up-tempo style. (Are we playing a down-tempo style?) Anyway, here are four things I think we can realistically change during the bye:
1. Put receivers in motion. It seems other teams are constantly jamming our receivers or playing us right up on the line, which makes it difficult for them to get a clean release or separation. Granted, some of that has to do with us not taking shots down field, and some of it has to do with the idea that jamming our receivers is a risk that gives the defense a greater opportunity for a sack (not that they really need any help). Even a small back and forth can help with a clean release and can help to give the QB a better idea of what type of defense (man or zone) is being played; it can sometimes do as much as dictating the defense's play call (see link.) For a nice NFL Films article about how motion helped Matt Ryan throw his first career TD, try this link.
2. Line up Lee Evans or Terrell Owens in the slot. A few times per game. I've seen T.O. there every once in a while, but we haven't gotten him the ball. New England does this all the time to create advantageous match ups for themselves (Moss on Corner = loss for us). While watching the Browns game, I tried to pay special attention to this, and twice I saw T.O. lined up in the slot and being guarded by a linebacker - 32-year-old David Bowens - and both times we ran the ball! That should be something our QB recognizes and he should audible to take advantage of that matchup for us.
3. PLEASE add another formation besides 3WR/1RB/1TE and 2WR/1RB/2TE. How about a few spread plays, or put our receivers on the same side of the field - anything! Part of the reason our offense seems so easy to stop is that it's very predictable. Do other defenses even game plan for us? They probably only need to use about a third of their playbooks - which is fine when we're pushing the tempo and tiring guys out. But now that the no-huddle is gone, some complexity must return to our formations.
4. Let Trent Edwards audible at the line again. The first two games he was like Peyton Manning back there changing the play, then it completely stopped against the Saints. It was working for us, so why did we get away from it? Even if we're not in the no-huddle, it can still be effective (see point 2 above.) Trent's greatest asset is his big ol' Stanford brain, so please let him use it. In a related note, please do not let Ryan Fitzpatrick ever audible again. His sequence of double audible-false start/audible-safety in the Carolina game actually made me laugh.
What do you guys think? Are these things actually possible to implement during the bye? Which one do you think would be most important? Did I miss anything?
This FanPost was written by a registered user of Buffalo Rumblings. Its views do not necessarily reflect the views of Rumblings' editorial staff, but are just as valued as our own.
4 recs |
63 comments
Comments
Nice FanPost, Andy. Bumping this to the front page, because starting today, I’m going to try to do more of that. Notice, Rumblers: if you’ve got something to say and you present it as well as Andy did (or as well as other FanPosts that you’ve seen bumped), I’ll bump it. Gotta get more love for y’all, because y’all are smart.
As for your thoughts…
- - Buffalo actually used quite a bit of pre-snap motion against Houston. Owens did most of the moving, but Evans and Reed were motioned as well. They also faked the reverse to Owens quite a bit, which perfectly set up his TD run. We need to see more of it, but for now, the coaches appear to recognize the need for it, if only from a defense-diagnosing standpoint.
- - Again, saw more of this against Houston. Have also seen Owens/Evans line up on the same side of the field a bunch of times in the last 2-3 weeks.
- - Agreed completely. Possibly our best drive of the season, aside from the fourth-quarter score in NE, was the drive against TB where we ran 5-wide on every play. I realize the drive ended in an Edwards pick, but Tampa had NO CLUE how to slow us down on that drive, and we marched down the field with ease. We need that occasional wrinkle to make a return.
- - I’m OK with that, but I thought he was doing a lot of it to begin with.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Nov 3, 2009 11:51 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Urgh… 1,2,3,4…
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Nov 3, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think on 2 he may have meant more of the 3/4 guys on the same side of the field, bunch formation type plays? Try and confuse the defense a little bit….
Also, with owens or evans lining up in the slot, it would be a clear mismatch. I know trent has trouble throwing it, but since its the off week, lets work on it….. the slant.
here’s a good read/look: Slant Football
by quantumuprising on Nov 3, 2009 12:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This article also provides information about pre-snap motion and the quarterback choice involved
by quantumuprising on Nov 3, 2009 12:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I usually can deal, the general frustration level got a little out of control, so I decided it was more constructive to call out the TV guys than the bills. :)
by syrbillsfan on Nov 3, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice article
The slant would be a nice play to have in our arsenal – just look at Evans’ TD against the Jets to see how effective it can be, especially when you can get it to a guy like him in space.
Video:
http://tinyurl.com/ykbu9cy
by Andy Boron on Nov 3, 2009 2:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They also faked the reverse to Owens quite a bit
There were never any reverses. Owens had the end-around fake many times, and the one that went for a touchdown. It is a mistake to be lulled by the TV commentators. There is hardly ever an actual reverse. When there is, the commentators call it a “double reverse”. As far as I remember on the Owens play, Fitzie handed the ball to Owens directly.
It ridiculous how often they get that wrong on TV. The other thing that’s ridiculous is how many time they say a ball is almost intercepted. Either it is or isn’t.
Sorry Brian, that’s been stewing since Sunday.
by syrbillsfan on Nov 3, 2009 12:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You’re right, and it happens all the time. It was just something i learned to live with.
by quantumuprising on Nov 3, 2009 12:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I remember it as a reverse
… the ball tossed by either Jackson or Lynch, the ball turning end over end during its brief flight, and TO catching it (!) in stride going the other way. If that didn’t happen, i need to see a doctor for memory issues.
by Sixteenthback on Nov 3, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, saw more of this against Houston. Have also seen Owens/Evans line up on the same side of the field a bunch of times in the last 2-3 weeks.
It’s about time. That is something that should have been a staple all season.
Is SBN ever going to make changes to get that 1, 2, 3…. thing fixed? That seems to happen when some post numbers as 1. 2. 3. right?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 3, 2009 12:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You have to do it “#1”, “#2”, #3", so on for it to quirk out like that. Not sure why…
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Nov 3, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see
- Weird
- #2
- #3
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 3, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm
didn’t work for me haha
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 3, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
#1
#2
#3
#4
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Nov 3, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
- - Stuff 1
- - Stuff 2
- - Stuff 3
- - Stuff 4
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Nov 3, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, I officially have no effing clue.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Nov 3, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One more try
- Dick Jauron
- Rod Marinelli
- Cam Cameron
- Scott Linehan
- Mike Nolan
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 3, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There we go
You have to double space the list
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 3, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d like to thank you bastards for putting that Coolio song in my head.
1,2,3,4 getcha woman on the floor…..
by quantumuprising on Nov 3, 2009 12:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta, gotta get up to get down.....
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 3, 2009 12:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice call.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Nov 3, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think 4 and 5 wide is nuts.
Except against teams with a poor pass rush.
Use that for more than 1 play or 2 a game, and Trent get’s concussion #3, this line is having problems blocking a 3 and 4 man rush when they know a pass is coming, 4 and 5wr sets is feeding Trent to the wolves against any team that has any semblence of a pass rush.
There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.
by The Buffalo Kid on Nov 3, 2009 9:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The point of having that many receivers is to spread the defense out, and its usually quick passes.
"Security comes from earning it--not seeking it." Marv Levy
by howedyhowe on Nov 3, 2009 11:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
more formations and let Trent audible
Those are the most important, because it lends itself to the bills offense being too predictable. Imgin hitting TO in the slot… it would be great. Hell, my Madden gameplan is much more complex than this.
Good Luck With Your Firings Mr. Wilson….Go Bills!
by killascript on Nov 3, 2009 11:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
also
can anyone explain, just why our offense got less complex after two soiid games… makes no sense
Good Luck With Your Firings Mr. Wilson….Go Bills!
by killascript on Nov 3, 2009 11:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
"Bunching" Receivers
Opponents wouldn’t know what to do if Buffalo even just lined up TO and Evans to one side or motioned one over. I’m also for motioning Jackson from the backfield to the slot position.
Is it allowed to put receivers closer to the middle where the line is?? Could you line Owens and Evans inside the hash mark? I think you could run a route slashing out towards the sideline and the back in or up. I’m not sure if that would work, just haven’t seen anything like that. (Like a double slot, but with both guys on the same side.)
by syrbillsfan on Nov 3, 2009 12:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Oops!
You forgot the most obvious one…
Bench Lynch and make Fred Jackson the rightful starter at RB.
The Dick Jauron version of the K-Gun...the Squirt Gun.
by ChipShot on Nov 3, 2009 12:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Not sure how that’s as big a deal as you’re making it out to be. No matter who the “starter” is, you’re going to see both on the field.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Nov 3, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And both will continue to struggle with the the line as it is.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Nov 3, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Down with the two back system?
Maybe the two back system isn’t working with those guys. Maybe it’s time to let one of them get the majority of the reps for the game and only use the alternate guy to keep the main guy fresh.
Trample the weak, hurdle the dead!
by fansince83 on Nov 3, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve been a fan of this strategy from the start. Why could Thurman, who was 5’10" and 198 lbs handle a full load, but the bigger guys today can’t? Those guys lasted years longer and were smaller. Maybe it was because the defenders hitting them were smaller.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Nov 3, 2009 4:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It is a big deal in the fact that it takes backs time to get into a groove when running the ball. some people downplay that fact but the do in fact need carriers to become more productive. you hear it all the time that the RB is running better with each carry. being a running back in my former life I can attest to that fact.
by gatornation on Nov 3, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure how that’s as big a deal as you’re making it out to be.
It is a big deal. I’m not so sure we should be seeing that much of Lynch right now. Let me put it this way: if you were an opposing DC, who would rather have to prepare for, Lynch or Jackson?
The Dick Jauron version of the K-Gun...the Squirt Gun.
by ChipShot on Nov 3, 2009 3:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why?
What exactly has Jackson done in the past month?
Since Lynch returned from suspension:
Jackson: 51 carries, 154 yards, 3.0 ypc, 5 receptions for 43 yards
Lynch: 70 carries, 217 yards, 3.1 ypc, 17 receptions for 123 yards
So why should Jackson be getting all the work?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 3, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Simple
When Jackson got all of the work, he produced…in a big way.
Rest my case.
The Dick Jauron version of the K-Gun...the Squirt Gun.
by ChipShot on Nov 3, 2009 8:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And how do you know Lynch wouldn't have succeeded given all those touches?
With the way the OL is playing, it doesn’t matter anyhow. Neither RB has much of a chance.
You don’t have much of a case there.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 4, 2009 1:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great job Andy. I especially like point #3. It sounds like Hardy will be active next game. Would like to see us load up our WRs a few times agains the Titans.
by TJJ on Nov 3, 2009 12:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice post Andy....rec'd
I agree with a lot of it.
I have hated this offense all year, and not just because of the lack of production. My biggest problem is the lack of creativity in the play design and formations. These formations and plays are so simple and lack so few wrinkles that it isn’t exactly difficult to diagnose what is going on as a defense.
I guess that’s because of the Pop Warner offense and all, but there’s no reason this offense can’t start throwing out more formations and playcalls.
I totally agree with your #3. Gimme some 4 and 5 WR sets. Put Josh Reed in the backfield in passing situations. Line up in a trips right or left, including in a bunch. Etc, etc, etc. Don’t just keep lining up in the same formations every play. Didn’t the Texans LB’s talk about how simplistic our offensive formations and plays were??
TO needs to be in motion a lot. It’d help get him freed up of the line much easier, something that had been talked about in the offseason. We haven’t seen a lot of it, but they have put him in motion more and more. It seems when he goes in motion, we fake a handoff to him after handing off to the RB or actually give it to him. There needs to be more than that. I’d love to see a fake to the RB, fake to TO and bomb to Evans. Unfortunately, I don’t think the OL can handle that.
Nice observation on #2. If that is the case, then Edwards really can’t read a D. Any QB who sees that needs to audible into something with TO as the hot route. That’s pretty ridiculous. Putting TO and/or Evans in the slot more will also give the team the ability to get Steve Johnson on the field more. He isn’t a slot, but could become a solid outside WR for us. I want to see more of him.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 3, 2009 12:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Anything is worth the try. Agreed on all points.
Doesn’t this force Trent into making throws that are suspected to be his weekness. Isn’t this why Trent has been labeled as the checkdown machine. Isn’t that why we run the so called Pop Warner Offense. Alot of excellent ideas here. I just keep asking myself why aren’t we doing it. Coaches decision Vs QB’s and O-Line capability. God Andy don’t stop thinking about stuff like this, at least your staying with in the realms of what we have to work with.
Excuses are a sign of weakness!!!!!!
by VanScottM on Nov 3, 2009 12:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yes, anything that is different from the mush they’re putting on the field is better. This offense is about as appetizing as an ice cold Buffalo Wing Milkshake.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Nov 3, 2009 1:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I've always been a huge fan of bunch formations.......
granted I never get to see the games as I always work on Sundays and live on the wrong coast and have yet to stay at a Holiday inn (regular or express) so therefore……I lose.
“Boy, that escalated quickly… I mean, that really got out of hand fast.”
Anyways back on topic…..Bunch formations…..good for flooding zone coverage…….or creating “picks” for man to man coverage.
Used the bunch extensively during my HS football coaching tenure. Very successful if done properly.
Pass the chocolate cake!
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 3, 2009 1:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m not certain the offensive strategy is up to the HS level yet. Give ’em a couple seasons.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Nov 3, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
whats sad is that I was coaching a Frosh team at the time too lol.
Pass the chocolate cake!
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 3, 2009 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Living in Pittsburgh
I’ve watched a lot of Steelers games and they use bunch formations all the time to free up Ward or Holmes. Granted Big Ben is a much better QB than Edwards (remember when everyone thought he was going to fall to us in that draft?) but it could still be a nice wrinkle, even if we only have 2 or 3 plays total in that package.
by Andy Boron on Nov 3, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly.......
and if you watch the game last night both Atl and NO used the Bunch a few times with some big play success.
Pass the chocolate cake!
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 3, 2009 3:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I could get used to watching the Steelers. They’re such an awesome team. I hate it!
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Nov 3, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
putting targets out there
is essential. Having time to recognize then hit the targets is critical. As I said in another post earlier today, creating a moving pocket and roll outs would help eleviate pressure and give Edwards time. Both he and line are young and mobile. As Brian mentioned in the film review, Fitz was getting surrounded before his 5th step. Straight drop backs and 5 step drops are working way too infrequently to develop a rhythm (or a sustained offense).
by fansince60 on Nov 3, 2009 1:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Like the idea of rollouts a lot
Just seems like every single time we’ve tried one this year there’s a rusher left unblocked who forces the QB into a rushed throw/throw away. That’s the biggest reason I didn’t include it.
by Andy Boron on Nov 3, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
seems that way
I agree. Roll out or not, we need someone to block. But, it’s worth a shot. What they’re doing now ain’t working…
by fansince60 on Nov 3, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Looking back, I’m mind-boggled how I – like so many other Bills-fans – thought this offense would be successful this year given the inconvenient fact that we had a young, inexperienced, cagey QB and a yet-to-be-determined O-line that lacked experience and cohesion as well. In addition to having a rookie OC, who was announced OC just ten days before the season opener.
Boy, we should have seen this coming…
by BillsfanfromDenmark on Nov 3, 2009 2:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The offense
has been so bad that I’m in favor of trying anything different. However, I believe that good teams execute and bad teams scheme. The old Packers had about 6 plays.
by jpheff on Nov 3, 2009 4:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I would add these
- Get our young guys on the field at WR. We need to see what we have in Hardy and Johnson. We know what we have in Reed (and his contract is up this season).
- This one is out there, but we’re desperate. Play an offensive lineman in the backfield. Not even kidding here. Hangartner and Chambers are getting blown backwards every other play. We need an extra body to protect the QB. Have someone like McKinney play as a fullback type player and just block who ever gets free. Trent is going to literally get killed if we don’t protect him. Yes we lose one extra receiver, but this pocket is collapsing like a whoopee cushion every down.
- The direct snap to Jackson and Lynch should be half of our game plan from now on.
- When Trent is in the game, force him to throw every down. No more conservative Dick ball. Let’s see if he can throw for 300 yards if you throw it literally every time he gets a snap.
- Hire a damn consultant. The offense is one of the worst in the league, and we’er not looking for any help to make it better. We fired our offensive coordinator before the season started, and we promoted the QB coach. So we’ve got an offensive coordinator with no experience coordinating, and we didn’t care to replace the QB coach. This doesn’t take rocket science… hire someone to help consult this offense on how to play football.
Ok, I’m done with my rant.
by bruuuuce_02 on Nov 3, 2009 5:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your first point, but I’m sure that won’t happen until week 14 or so when we’re mathematically eliminated from the playoff race.
As for the others, the OL in the backfield is interesting, but I don’t know that we can really spare any extra OL with the injuries we have. The Wildcat has been used a bit by almost every team, but Miami seems to be the only one who’s figured out how to make it consistently effective. Trent will literally die if he throws the ball that much behind our O-Line, and a consultant at this point in the year (after the bye) would probably not be that effective, IMO. I’d rather see Ralph hire a GM during the season so he can get to know the team rather than a consultant.
by Andy Boron on Nov 3, 2009 7:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d rather see Ralph hire a GM during the season so he can get to know the team rather than a consultant.
Who?
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
"Matt’s pretty valuable to y’all. Cherish him." - BG
by MattRichWarren on Nov 5, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I loved that 5 wide spread formation...
It seemed to work better when we had Schouman as the slot/checkdown option for Trent. It would seem that it would still be doable with Nelson, Jackson, or Marshawn as the fifth option. I think even 4 wide sets with a RB in the backfield would help out or running game as well. Even if they send a blitz, Edwards should be able to find someone open in these formations. With Hardy potentially on his way back after the bye, there are all sorts of potential mismatches out there.
Regardless of how crappy our OL has been, this would seem like a good way to get around some of the pressure and get rid of the ball quickly. If they blitz, there’s going to be a mismatch somewhere that Trent should be able to exploit. That way, even if he’s “checking down” it will actually be beyond the line of scrimmage for, you know, that all-too foreign concept of positive yardage.
by live6453 on Nov 3, 2009 9:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
5 wide = Trent concussion #3
absolutely nuts except against the teams with a bottom quarter pass rush.
There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.
by The Buffalo Kid on Nov 3, 2009 9:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
New England runs a 5 wide set a lot,, and Brady get the ball out extremely fast…thats the point of it.
"Security comes from earning it--not seeking it." Marv Levy
by howedyhowe on Nov 3, 2009 11:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
trent is not brady
thats the whole problem
There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.
by The Buffalo Kid on Nov 4, 2009 10:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Trent is more like Rich Gannon
If you want to find plays to help Trent, you should be looking at Rich Gannon film not Tom Brady film.
There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.
by The Buffalo Kid on Nov 4, 2009 11:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We can't protect him against 4 man rushes
maybe it’s better to try spreading out a defense and taking some chances….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Nov 4, 2009 1:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Trent is already playing scared.
If we start going spread with him, he’s either gonna get blitzed hard, or 8 man coverages depending on opponent.
We did this last year and teams still sacked him even with a three man rush.
I think it’s time to go to an I formation base set, and leave 1 back to help with pass protection.
We gave it a half hearted try in Fitz’s first start, we really need to try to keep Trent upright his first game back. He was already playing scared before concussion #2, throw him to the wolves with 4 and 5 wide receiver sets and I think he has no chance and gets concussion #3.
There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.
by The Buffalo Kid on Nov 4, 2009 10:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Some things I'd like to see.
Teach Trent the pump fake……he almost Never uses it. Rothlisberger has put on a clinic this season on how to use the pump fake. Good pump fakes get defenders out of position, it also helps your line so when pass rushers get in the air to try to bat the pump fake down, they usually get put on the ground, it’s easy to pancake a pass rusher who bites on the pump fake and goes for a batted ball.
Run a draw with the QB under center to help the line. I don’t mean a delayed handoff only, hold that ball up on the draw like you are looking to throw quick, even on step 2 of a 3 step drop. It draws DEs upfield, especially when the tackles jump up like it’s a pass, when they see the quarterback looking downfield with the ball up, opens up the B gap, especially out of the I formation and slows down the rush from the DE position if you burn them once or twice. We have not run 1 draw like this the entire year. Dallas just killed Carolina on Monday night football with this play, see the film. The key to making this work is the guards and center holding their ground at the line of scrimmage so the runner doesn’t get tackled before hitting the B gap.
Use the pro set formation, it is such a great formation for dual threat running back tandems, we haven’t seen it in Buffalo since the Thurman/Davis days. Yes it’s a bread and butter WC formation, let’s give it a shot, the possibilites are endless.
Use motion, not for diagnosing coverages, but for getting clean releases on receivers. If you use it to diagnose coverages you will just get a 6 man zone with 1 defender playing 1 on 1 on the motion man. Remember the Jets game Trent played last year, thats why Trent got fooled on a pick, Revis moved with the motion, Trent read man on man, result was a pick.
Get some misdirection plays that go between the tackles, you need more than the end around, how many misdirection plays have we seen go between the tackles? 1 maybe 2 the entire year?
Miami put on a clinic on how to do it in our first meeting this year,
Misdirection and good draws between the tackle are devastating to an over agrressive defender…..
ie Poz, he regularly runs himself out of the play on draws and misdirection between the tackles.
Use more play action with QB under center on 3rd and 3 and shorter, seems AVP likes to use play action most on 1st and 2nd and long. It’s most effective in short yardage against an aggressive defense, especially on 3rd and 4th down.
There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.
by The Buffalo Kid on Nov 3, 2009 10:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















