Re-assessing my stance in the Jason Peters debate
Last week, we discussed the ultimatum facing the Buffalo Bills this off-season in regards to two-time Pro Bowl LT Jason Peters: sign him or trade him. Ultimately, the "sign him" or "trade him" philosophies are where the vast majority of this fan base end up when discussing Peters.
In an effort to get a better understanding of just how critical a player of Peters' caliber is to a successful offense, let's examine how critical left tackle play was around the rest of the league this past season. Now, clearly, these are 32 unique offensive situations that we're examining here, so don't expect any of these statistics to define a clear-cut relationship between good left tackle play and good offensive production. This is merely an examination of elements of offensive situations and how they relate back to Buffalo's current offensive predicament.
The end result of this discussion is obviously a toss-up; I'll say now that while I've been a fervent supporter of signing Peters to a long-term extension, my opinion quickly shifted to neutral ground while running this "study". (I'm not a scholarly dude, and this isn't nearly in-depth enough to merit the use of the word "study", in all likelihood.) I'll let you make up your own mind from this point forward in regards to Peters, if you haven't done so already.
The debate surrounding the true value of the LT
Author Michael Lewis' claim to fame in football circles is his book entitled The Blind Side: Evolution of a Game. In it, he lays out the evolution of pro football offenses from run-oriented to finesse, pass-oriented attacks, and documents the rising importance of left tackle play during said evolution. Obviously, NFL teams agree with the principle of this assessment, because athletic left tackles are snatched up nearly as quickly as perceived "franchise" quarterbacks during each annual NFL Draft.
But theories aren't laws. KC Joyner, he of ESPN.com fame as "The Football Scientist", penned an article in August of 2008 entitled Why the Left Tackle is Overrated. It relates sacks allowed by left tackles to total sacks allowed, using the percentages to show just how often bad lines have good left tackles and vice versa. It's an interesting read that, at a minimum, puts a dent in Lewis' original thesis. On a much more tangible level, it equals out the argument and sets up the baseline for the type of debate we've had surrounding Peters.
Interesting facts regarding LT play in 2008
This list - while unofficial and not totally complete with 2008 game data - at the very least gives us a base-level ranking of the play of all 32 NFL left tackles last season. Obviously, the data isn't 100% accurate (missing Week 17 data), but it's accurate enough to illustrate some of the loose points that can be made here. Below are some facts that might surprise you with relation to the play of left tackles and its relative importance to the grand scheme of things...
* Titans Pro Bowl LT Michael Roos trailed only Denver rookie LT Ryan Clady in fewest amount of sacks allowed. But despite the fact that the Titans were the league's seventh-best rushing team, they still had just the #21 offense in the league.
* Seahawks LT Walter Jones, considered one of the best tackles in the game over the past five years, gave up just 3.5 sacks in 12 games (tied for #13 in the league). Yet despite QB Seneca Wallace ranking #13 in QB rating, the Seahawks were a miserable #28 in total offense.
* New England had the fifth-best offense, the sixth-best rushing attack and the tenth-highest-rated QB (Matt Cassel) in the NFL last season. LT Matt Light ranked #24 amongst the league's 32 left tackles in sacks allowed.
* Texans rookie LT Duane Brown gave up the most sacks of any LT in the league (a feat he shared with - you guessed it - Jason Peters), but the Texans still ranked third overall in total offense.
* The Super Bowl champion Pittsburgh Steelers boasted the #24-ranked QB (Ben Roethlisberger), the #23-ranked rushing attack and the #22-ranked offense in the league behind one of the league's worst offensive lines. Yet LT Max Starks was a middle-of-the-pack left tackle (ranked T15 in sacks allowed).
* The Cardinals rode an explosive, fourth-ranked offense to Super Bowl XLIII despite featuring the league's worst rushing attack and LT Mike Gandy ranking just #20 in sacks allowed.
There's a lot to swallow here, and it's a mixed bag. There are examples of good left tackles on "bad" offenses (Jones, Starks, Roos). There are examples of underwhelming tackles on good offenses (Gandy, Light, Brown). Not mentioned here are examples of good tackles on good offenses (Clady in Denver, a team foiled by a terrible turnover margin and inconsistent QB play) and bad tackles on bad offenses (off the top of my head, Jeff Backus in Detroit and Kwame Harris in Oakland).
It's all about the complete package
Putting together and maintaining a dominant offensive line should only be a secondary concern in today's NFL. First and foremost - and feel free to scream "duh!" at your computer monitors - you have to have a good offense to compete in the league. Folks, even with a "dominant" left tackle, the Bills ranked #25 in offense last season. It wasn't good enough to win. (And if you didn't catch the sarcasm, the fact that Peters gave up 11.5 sacks is quite disturbing; even more so when considering that he was actually voted to the Pro Bowl.)
Building a good, cohesive offensive attack is about finding a harmonic relationship between quarterback play, line play, and execution. Right now, the Bills are lacking in all three departments. If things go well, QB Trent Edwards has the tools to develop into a consistent game-day quarterback capable of winning ball games. For now, consider that a check. Like it or not, Peters has given up 16.5 sacks over the past two seasons, and Buffalo's line has regressed in key areas throughout those 32 games. Fixing the line is a must. Obviously, execution of an offensive game plan has been about as rare as a Sasquatch sighting in Buffalo over the past few years.
I hear a lot of arguments about "building through the lines" and "adding playmakers" and "defense wins championships". The fact of the matter is this: no one cliche is the gold standard for fielding a winning team in the NFL. It sounds simple, but it's certainly not easy: to build a winner, put together the best group possible. Plenty of championship teams have been assembled in a wide variety of ways. The only constant is execution.
My ultimate thoughts on Peters and his future in Buffalo
I am a conservative person by nature. In terms of how my personality relates to my Bills fandom, I generally fly by the rule of "if you have something good, make sure the only way somebody gets it from you is by prying it from your cold, dead fingers". The debate here is just how "good" Peters is, just how much better he can be, and just how crippling a contract extension to Peters would be to the much more important goal of fielding a competitive offense. I mentioned that each NFL offense is a unique situation. In Buffalo's unique situation, I'm not convinced that giving in to Peters' contract demands make a lot of sense in the overall picture. Nor am I convinced that trading him will ensure that the Bills can improve other key weak areas on the team.
So today, I'm changing my opinion on Peters. I'm not forgetting the fact that he's a home-grown talent, nor am I forgetting that by moving him, we're just adding left tackle to an already long list of needs this off-season. I'm also not forgetting the merits of keeping a mega-talent in the prime of his playing career around, nor the value of maintaining continuity along your offensive front. I'm no longer an advocate of the "sign Peters" or "trade Peters" philosophies.
I'm only an advocate of getting better as a team. So my advice to the Bills regarding Peters is this (and you're welcome to apply the "meaningless" label to this advice): shop him and negotiate with him. Do anything in your power to put the best group of ten players you can around Trent Edwards. It doesn't matter if Peters is a part of that group or not. If he's here, we still need to execute better offensively, and we still need to block better up front. If he's not here, we still need to execute better offensively, and we still need to block better up front. It's not mandatory for the team to sign Peters or trade Peters. There are compelling arguments to make on both sides of this debate. So consider me an active member of the "wait and see" approach. If Peters gets his extension, great - let's hope it comes with some restructured contracts and an avenue through which the team can further improve. If Peters is traded, great - let's hope it comes with enough ammo to fill his left tackle spot and make a significant addition elsewhere. I'm not fussy, folks. We can get better with Peters, and we can get better without him.
2 recs |
106 comments
|
Comments
Agreed
I agree with you final sentence. I personally think Peters is over-rated. How he was a pro-bowler this year baffles me. He was pushed around and man handled nearly every game. His commitment to the team showed me everything with his hold out. Go earn your money, don’t hold a team hostage. He could have been dominate if he would have been to training camp and played in the pre season.
Why not Bobby April?
by nickdaniels on Feb 12, 2009 1:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I tried to keep all feelings about the player himself out of the equation here, because when push comes to shove, only in extreme cases (see: Owens, Terrell) does this type of stuff really matter. The vast majority of football decisions should be made from the business end of things, and I’m including building a winner in that equation. So Peter’s actions matter very little to me. All that matters is putting the best product on the field.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 1:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But the very fact that you mention the cohesiveness of offensive lines shows that Peters’ me-first antics DO matter.
by thefourwinds on Feb 13, 2009 12:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn you Brian
I was in the Sign Peters camp, but now I’m wavering a bit. Not that I want him traded, nor do I think it’s a good idea, but I would at least be more accepting of it. We could obviously get a pretty good return on him, I would hope, and if not, there’s no point in trading him. If there was any potential replacement in place, I would be more in favor of a trade. I don’t consider Chambers a viable LT option for 16 games. I just don’t like the idea of trading Peters and then taking a rookie LT in the draft and hoping he works out.
Just seeing that dang 11.5 sacks allowed in 13 games stat again, I guess it finally hit me square in the jaw. At least when the other guys are shown as well. That’s just awful. I might chalk up about half of those sacks allowed to coming in late and being out of football shape, but even then, he’s still in the bottom half of the league. And I just can’t blame Losman for all those sacks, ha!
Joyner also wrote a book, Blindsided, trying to debunk the theory. Haven’t read that yet, but I did enjoy The Blind Side, so I’m going to have to check it out of the library soon.
One thing about Peters though. He may not be an elite LT, at least not yet, due to the pass blocking woes of this past year, BUT I firmly believe he’s an ELITE run blocker. One of the best run blocking LT’s in the league. I know the sack issue is huge and I’m sure we could find a competent pass blocking LT somewhere, but we can’t forget about the need for a good run blocker as well.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 12, 2009 1:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Haha, “damn” me? Harsh, K. I sincerely apologize for wavering your stance, just as mine was wavered.
You make a good point about the run blocking, and Peters was a big reason why despite a slow start, the Bills ultimately ranked #14 in rushing. But I’d even contemplate sacrificing Peters’ run blocking if it meant a more cohesive effort up front.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But I’d even contemplate sacrificing Peters’ run blocking if it meant a more cohesive effort up front.
If only it were that simple!
Having no replacement is the biggest detractor for a Peters trade IMO.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 12, 2009 1:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on both counts.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 1:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
IF IF IF IF Bell were ready, I would be willing to trade Peters for as much as we could get
But Bell is still a year or two away from being ready. He needs to get bigger and stronger to be effective over 16 games. If he comes to OTAs 30 pounds heavier and alot stronger then I could be convinced to go to the trade route right away since he has good feet and shadowing skills.
But like you and Brian, I am officially in the “wait and see what happens” camp.
I told the witch doctor that I was in love with the Buffalo Bills, and instead of telling me to say "Oh eeh oh oh ah, ting tang walla walla wing bang" in order to make me feel better he told me to buy a gun and end it.
by WABillsfan on Feb 12, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Peters
yeah to me it is pretty simple. He is a dominant run blocker, and in the last 6 games of the season I saw him finishing blocks, down field, being aggressive, and that was awesome to see. He gives up sacks as a pass-blocker, but part of that I think is Dockery kind of sucks next to him. Peters is, and I truly believe, IS, an elite LT. He is really damn good. But the queestion I keep raising is can he be worth a mega-deal? With Schobel, Stroud, McKelvin, Lynch, Evans, Dockery, Walker, all these big contracts, and with possibly Edwards coming up in 2-3 years, and we all want Free Agents, is it really worth it to invest all of this into Peters?
I’m fine either way. But I think if you can trade him, and use that pick to make this team better, than I have no hard feelings. We have A LOT OF MONEY invested in teh OL already with Dockery, Butler and Walker. I think that’s where teh FO is struggling. Our portfolio needs to be diversified. Let’s spend some money elsewhere may be the line of thinking for Buffalo. If we could get one more season out of him before we traded him though, I would love to see that. Im a big proponent of getting a full season out of him, OTA’s and all, play 2009, then trade him, and get a king’s ransom in return
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Feb 12, 2009 1:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dock
I think you hit the nail on the head there. I’ll start by saying it flat out, I’m of the sign him camp, although not at any price. Like you said we have A LOT of money put into the o-line, se we need to adress that issue if we’re to sign Peters again.
I honestly think that the 11.5 sack that he gave up this year are a combo of missing training camp AND Dockery being a piss poor pass blocker. Don’t get me wrong, Dock is a great run blocker, but his pass blocking skills are comparible to Steve Hutchinson, he’s got none. Now that might work for the Vikings, but it’s not working so well for us.
I think the ideal way to handle this would be to get rid of Dock, and his mega-(useless)deal, and then resigning Peters, cause lets be honest, it’s easier to find a good guard than it is to find a great LT.
by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 12, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Job Brian!!!!
That is a very well balanced look at the situation. Best article you have ever written. Rec’ed!!!
Teach your children about the four seasons: preseason, regular season, postseason, and off-season
by Joe P. on Feb 12, 2009 1:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well, shucks, thanks Joe. I figured someone would call me a waffler before I heard anything like this. :)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 1:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
After what happened with Gandy
We could very well trade Peters to Arizona for Boldin and a 3rd rounder (I think Peters is worth more because of position) and spend Peters resigning money on Boldin
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Feb 12, 2009 1:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
just want to add
that i think we should pay the man, pay peters. Im not persuaded at all. If we trade him then we are being the typical Bills.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Feb 12, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How so? When have we ever traded a player and gotten value as opposed to letting them walk scott-free? The latter is what I would call “being the typical Bills”.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
true,
I was talking in reference to letting young talent leave
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Feb 12, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I get that, and as Kurupt said (and I agreed with), it’s the biggest detractor to a potential deal. I can’t say I’m crazy about losing young talent either. But I’m also not crazy about pigeon-holing ourselves financially by giving in to Peters’ contract demands just for the sake of not losing him. As I said, we can’t get into another holdout situation with this guy.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 2:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Peters to AZ for Boldin, a 3rd, and...
Mike Gandy!
Anyway, jokes aside. I didn’t realize that Peters was tied last for sacks allowed. That’s unacceptable and should lower his bargaining leverage. I expect a dominant “elite” LT to be able to handle 99% of the situations he encounters with dominant, consistent play. If he is such a run-blocking force, why did the line stink so bad near the goal?
I’ve been of the mindset for some time now that Peters isn’t irreplaceable . I think it would best serve the team if he stays. I think he needs to be paid for his production, but based on his contribution to the TEAM. All accolades should be scrutinized. Just because he’s a Pro Bowler doesn’t mean he’s been playing at a Pro Bowl level most of his career.
I’m sorry – i’m still having a hard time coming to grips with the sack stat. How did he get elected? There has to be something to it, in terms of it elevating his worth, and i’d be curious to know if many players (throughout the league) want to see him get a leg up on the team.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 12, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s an absolute crime that Peters got any sort of recognition over Ryan Clady.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
isnt
the sack stat misleading? Didn’t he have a great second half after he got into the groove after his holdout?
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Feb 12, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he looked slow and overmatch at the line all season. He was a beast down the field and out in space, on run plays. I’m more than mildly concerned with his play at the goalline though.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 12, 2009 2:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think if Peters can be had for 5 years 50 mil we should do it. He’ll develop finer technique in addition to this physical skills as he gets older. Remember, hes still new to this offensive tackle thing
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Feb 12, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
5y50M?
wow that’s really high! Dude i’m part of the sign him camp and even I’d trade him if thats what he’s asking for. The max I’d give him is 6M per year plus performance bonuses.
by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 12, 2009 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There’s quite literally a 0% chance that Peters signs here for $6M per season.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 3:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
At a minimum.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If Peters were to sign for 6 a year...
I will never type anything stupid on this website again.
Basically – that won’t happen.
Brian – I get the feeling you think you are “waffling” with your stance. I don’t think so at all. I think it’s becoming obvious that Peters is going to cost a bunch, and at some point, an organization has to draw the line at how much is too much.
by krytime on Feb 12, 2009 7:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It is nice to have some company
I can remember it being very lonely in the “Consider trading Peters Camp”.
Teach your children about the four seasons: preseason, regular season, postseason, and off-season
by Joe P. on Feb 12, 2009 9:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you since day 1
You’re not alone. We have tons of holes; we need lots of draft picks. Trade Peters to Philly for their 2 first rounders. Besides, this is the best year to do it, because of the amount of really good offensive linemen in the draft this year.
Peters’ value will not get any higher than what it is now.
Bills fan half way around the world
by moncheri on Feb 14, 2009 4:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks.....good to have some backup.
Teach your children about the four seasons: preseason, regular season, postseason, and off-season
by Joe P. on Feb 14, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sack stats are always misleading, but a sack given up is a sack given up in my book.
A far more interesting breakdown would be sacks he gave up with Edwards in the game as compared to Losman. Something like that would have a lot more meaning.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 2:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yes very good point
Ron! Get on it!
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Feb 12, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL why does it have to be Ron?
Edwards was sacked 23 times last season in 50 quarters. That’s about half a sack per quarter.
Losman was sacked 15 times last season in 14 quarters. Obviously, that’s a hair over a sack per quarter.
OK, maybe it has to be Ron. Those stats tell us, quite literally, that Edwards is twice as good as Losman at avoiding sacks. But they’re not Peters-specific sacks, obviously. If Ron has the games in which Peters gave up sacks, it’d be pretty easy to put together, I’d imagine.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought I saw somewhere that Edwards and Losman nearly split sacks down the middle, with JP’s obviously coming in only a few games.
I don’t fully blame JP’s fumble vs the Jets on him. Peters HAS to make a play. He’s "elite! I don’t like the argument that the percentage of CB blitzing is so low he couldn’t have been ready. Someone elite is always ready.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 12, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If we could get one more season out of him before we traded him though, I would love to see that. Im a big proponent of getting a full season out of him, OTA’s and all, play 2009, then trade him, and get a king’s ransom in return
If we do that then OBD would seriously have to look at who they have to replace him and potentially make a move to find his replacement this year, either through the draft (LT’s are in abundance this year), through FA or hope that Bell has progressed to the point that he could start on the line.
by gatornation on Feb 12, 2009 1:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Getting one more season out of Peters without a new contract will mean you get him holding out or feigning injury.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 12, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why is everyone forgetting Langston Walker?
He did a good job when he was forced to fill in for JP. He is a veteran that I believe used to play LT and could definetly do it for a whole season.
The main theme with these comparisons is the good teams have good QB’s, where the QB has a quick release like Warner or is ellusive in the pocket like Big Ben. Kerry Collins was aksed not to lose games in Ten. because of their outstanding D so thats why his ranking is so low. The other corellation that would be interesting would be where the Centers importance is in this equation. We have all been told that things start up front, especially against 3-4 teams the C is just as important as the LT. I know its more work but would be interesting to see.
I maintian to trade JP for an established DE or OLB. The draft is always the ideal way to build a team but there is always a risk that a college player is a bust at the NFL level (we have seen our fair share) and so far OBD has done a decent job brining in FA’s that have all, for the most part, contributed. This way also, they could then trade down (maybe in the JP deal) and solidify the offensive line by drafting Mack without reaching for him.
For the people that say you don’t trade away your best player… If your best player is your LT then you are not a very good team, and if you can get more / better players for him then for the good of the team you should do it.
by Honestabe75 on Feb 12, 2009 1:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Haha, I was about to yell about not being able to trade Losman, but then realized that by “JP”, you meant Peters. Confusing…
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 2:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL no big. I figured it out eventually. :)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 2:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was clamoring for LW early on in the season, which was quickly dismissed by many. I think he’d do a good job, but he’s not quick on his feet.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 12, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly...
he’s not quick on his feet.
Walker was adequate. He is a road grader and not a pass protector. His feet aren’t the greatest and he’ll occasionally get beat on the outside.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 12, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll take occasional with Walker if it’s the same occasional as Peters.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 12, 2009 2:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sign Peters, Trade Dock
I said it above, i’ll repeat it here, I think JPeters’ sack stats are missleading not only because of Losman, but also because he has a guard that almost can’t pass block playing beside him. I say we take the Colt’s approach at the O-line: Great tackles (check) great centre (despratly need) and avrage tackles. it’s worked out great for them for the last decade… mind you having Payton Maning probably helps too.
Anyways my point is if we’re concerned about the amount of salery we have on the O-line then don’t get rid of you best player on the o-line, but the highpriced underachiavers (Dockery).
by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 12, 2009 3:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great tackles (check) great centre (despratly need) and avrage tackles.
I’m assuming you meant average guards?
Indy’s tackles aren’t great. They’re both solid players, and Peyton Manning makes their sack rates look great. But I see your point.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah i ment guards. i just think that if we’re to cut cost it should be at guard, where we have a preston who could do a decent job replacing Dock and then give Peters the big contract.
and right now indy’s tackle’s aren’t great, but a lot of ppl can make a case for LT Tarik Glenn to be a future HOFer.,
by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 12, 2009 4:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe Peters is overrated - But.....
- When you state that Walter Jones hardly gave up any sacks, he didn’t have Tom Brady or Randy Moss on his team. You are only as good as the players around you. If you have a statue back there instead of Michael Vick, excuse me, or a Vince Young, Donovan McNabb, obviously the offensive line will give up fewer sacks. Or if you have a JP “the popcorn vendors open in row-B” Losman, who holds onto the ball forever, that also results in more sacks. Believe you have to look at how these lineman do against top pass-rushers like Freeney or Peppers!
by BuffaloWhiner on Feb 12, 2009 2:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
When you state that Walter Jones hardly gave up any sacks, he didn’t have Tom Brady or Randy Moss on his team.
I’m not sure where you’re going with this. He had Seneca Wallace as his QB last year. That’s more impressive than if he’d given up the same number with Brady or, heck, even his “real” QB, Matt Hasselbeck.
It’s not necessarily true that left tackles protecting mobile quarterbacks give up fewer sacks. You mentioned McNabb; he’s a good example, as Tra Thomas finished T3 this year. But Roethlisberger proved his escapability and ability to stretch plays out during Pittsburgh’s post-season run, and his LT, Max Starks, was T15. David Garrard is mobile, but Khalif Barnes finished T24. Jeff Garcia can move around, but Donald Penn finished 27. Tony Romo? Flozell Adams was #23. Cassel is a solid example as well.
Believe you have to look at how these lineman do against top pass-rushers like Freeney or Peppers!
That’s the same argument as saying look at a team’s schedule to see how good you are. You can’t help who you play, just like these guys can’t help who they have to block. All that matters is production.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly Brian.
Seneca Wallace was converted to WR. I will admit that his stats were impressive jumping in and with NOONE to throw to. But that also speaks volume to Walter Jones’ abilities.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 12, 2009 3:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
JP "the popcorn vendors open in row-B" Losman
nice.
Kawika Mitchell is a leader. He will help this young team develop.
by poz on Feb 12, 2009 3:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Trade him.
If the money comes anywhere near Jake Long territory I would trade him immediatley. Peters has such an over inflated view of his own self worth it is terrible. No way would I pay him a penny more after the way he played this year. He is under contract and I would trade him. Most importantly trade him while the rest of the NFL thinks he is a stud for some reason. Great post but I wanted to trade him before this. He has no leverage to even be the highest pid player on the Bills offensive line but I think he would like to be one of the top paid linemen in the league. Giving him more than his contract dictates after the abortion of a season he had makes my stomache churn.
When does maybe next year become this year?
by kenner70 on Feb 12, 2009 4:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
He has no leverage to even be the highest pid player on the Bills offensive line
I disagree with your general opinions on Peters and his “inflated self worth”, but those are just opinions. I think you’re flat-out wrong, however, above. Peters has two Pro Bowls to his name, deserved or not. None of his linemates can make the same claim. Factually speaking, that gives him a LOT of leverage to be the highest paid player on the line.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You misundewrstand I am making an argument saying he doesn’t deserve it. If perception is reality which it is he absolutely holds all the cards. He has a ton of leverage I am making a argument that it would be a mistake to sign him to the kind of deal he wants. I feel LT is the most overrated position in football and yes it is an opinion but it’s mine so it’s special or something like that. I can definitely see the other side all the hype he gets, he is homegrown, started as a TE I want him to be the best LT in the league. He just isn’t and spending in the neighborhood of $8 to $11 million dollars a year I do not think is a wise investment on him.
When does maybe next year become this year?
by kenner70 on Feb 12, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LT is overrated when the QB is a lefty.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 13, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's not be Wishy Washy
Its easier said than done getting the 10 best players around Trent. Peters is a good left tackle, and with a full camp can be a top ten LT next year. We do not need to searching for a top 10 LT when we already have one on the roaster. Football is a business and Peters and any other player should negociate to get all he can from their team. The Bills need to stop crying pay the prevailing market for a top 10 LT. If they feel they can’t afford to pay the prevailing market price for players than they need to sell the team to someone who will.
by gjv on Feb 12, 2009 5:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m not being wishy washy. Basically I’m saying that for once, the Bills are in a no-lose situation with a top talent, no matter which route they decide to take.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 7:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wait a second...slow down on that thought big guy.
This is not a no-lose situation. It can be, but it could also turn out to be a huge lose-lose thing too.
This might be the first tough task Brandon has to face. On one hand, he could play it with signing Peters to more money then any Buffalo athlete ever, and he’ll continue to improve and play in multiple Pro Bowls. On the other hand, they could trade him and get a nice little bevy of draft picks, and have each and every one of them **it the bead.
Watching the way Brandon handles this will be very interesting. I for one, sugget that he be aggressive now, and sign Peters before FA opens. You’ll never get him cheaper. Ever. I would also suggest playing hardball with him and Parker.
by krytime on Feb 12, 2009 8:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The only way it’s a “lose” situation is if it gets into the holdout stages again.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 12, 2009 9:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's not necessarily true.
This can get ugly at many a point between now and it’s resolution. For that matter, it can get ugly even after.
Again – Brandon is on the clock. It’ll be interesting to watch him on this one.
by krytime on Feb 12, 2009 10:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d love to hear you expand on this, because you don’t provide any examples of how it can get sticky…
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2009 6:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
More a matter of “when” than “if,” imo.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 13, 2009 11:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, that’s just pessimistic of you.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2009 12:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The mere fact that the organization made him wait the whole season does not bode well for him signing before FA starts. He’s bound to find out what LTs (and even draftees) are getting this offseason.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 13, 2009 7:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is a tough one. To me, part of the problem is Eugene Parker. He seems to make the contract process more difficult than it needs to be. The other part is Jason himself. His holdout last year was very selfish and showed absolutely NO team loyalty. He tried to create leverage when none was there. That kind of stubborn intransigence does not sit well. If we give Jason, say, a five year deal will he live with it or become a jerk after two years and hold out again? I’d tell him up front that if he pulls that kind of stunt again after a short time we’ll trade him to the Lions.
If we resign him I would most certainly backload his salary to help insure that another asinine holdout will not occur. Give him a good upfront guarantee and let his salary increase over time. What else can OBD do? Jake Long is getting 10Mil per year. Jason is not as good as Long. So I’d offer an escalating salary that averages 9Mil per with a good upfront guarantee. After what happened last year the team needs to spell it out to Jason that the contract is the way it is partly because of the holdout. If Eugene and Jason refuse, trade him to a team that likes malcontents. I’d also say to Parker that the team needs to see that Jason has returned to his preinjury form. He has in run blocking but not in pass blocking. Another reason for a backloaded contract. If we trade him I hope we get a tackle who has a decent agent. I know, wishful thinking there.
everything goes better with a BIG MACK
by keuka121 on Feb 12, 2009 5:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Include a ton of performance escalators to get his ass to work on his techniques
Also tie in a bunch to overall team performance like red zone TDs etc. Make him understand in his contract that TEAM success will lead to financial success for him. This way we can keep his salary a little bit more reasonable while getting full effort from him. It may also lead him to step up and be a real leader on the Oline since he is our best lineman and push them all to succeed since he needs them to do well to get paid.
I told the witch doctor that I was in love with the Buffalo Bills, and instead of telling me to say "Oh eeh oh oh ah, ting tang walla walla wing bang" in order to make me feel better he told me to buy a gun and end it.
by WABillsfan on Feb 12, 2009 7:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
All good ideas,
but do you really see Peters agreeing to terms like that? I don’t.
Teach your children about the four seasons: preseason, regular season, postseason, and off-season
by Joe P. on Feb 12, 2009 9:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Performance escalators???
Like sacks allowed? That’s about the only stat escalator other than the Pro Bowl.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 13, 2009 9:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Easy to put them in MRW
Sacks allowed, Probowls, end of season rankings for Run and Pass offenses, red zone TDs and %, the list goes on and on.
I told the witch doctor that I was in love with the Buffalo Bills, and instead of telling me to say "Oh eeh oh oh ah, ting tang walla walla wing bang" in order to make me feel better he told me to buy a gun and end it.
by WABillsfan on Feb 13, 2009 5:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I just didn't know he would go for that
considering so many of those are out of his hands….
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 14, 2009 11:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he would if WITH them he could become the highest paid LT in football history
I told the witch doctor that I was in love with the Buffalo Bills, and instead of telling me to say "Oh eeh oh oh ah, ting tang walla walla wing bang" in order to make me feel better he told me to buy a gun and end it.
by WABillsfan on Feb 13, 2009 5:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't mean to be argumentative,
but don’t you think a team will offer him the same money without them?
Teach your children about the four seasons: preseason, regular season, postseason, and off-season
by Joe P. on Feb 13, 2009 5:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Enjoyable, relevant read
A lot of good points here- especially regarding the acknowledgement that trying to encompass all winning formulas into one or two cliches (something I tend to in my obsessive compulsive nature) is fruitless. To use another cliche, there’s more than one way to skin a cat. Again, I think Peters is pretty overrated, so I toitally advocate shopping him IF Buffalo is truly shopping him to add better players rather than just trying to avoid paying someone they truly think is elite. Getting two #1’s and using one on a new LT (Ryan Clady did just fine last year) and another impact player would certainly be worth the risk in my opinion…I’m also intrigued by the points above that possibly Dockery has been a major part of Peters’ somewhat underwhelming play the last two seasons (Following a really good 2006 season). I think that’s possible. In any case, despite the money that’s been put into the OL the last few years, it’s not very good as a whole. Buffalo needs to do more here than just add a center. They need to figure out if Peters is truly a difference maker that they need to lock up at the expense of other positions or if they feel they can get more assets by trading him. If Buffalo goes with keeping Peters, I think they need to do so by also coming to grips with the fact that they swung and missed with Dockery and Walker in ‘07. Like our WRs, TEs, and DEs heading into 2008, it’s obvious to me that the status quo isn’t working despite the money invested into these positions. Last year, Buffalo failed to EFFECTIVELY address any of these positions and thus, they’re still positions of need heading into 2009. Our marketing guru GM needs to figure out what’s wrong about the hype and price tag of our current OL and EFFECTIVELY fix it ASAP. I think they need to look at Peters objectively and determine what he’s worth in terms of wins and losses.
The passing of the torch is finally complete.
by Benjamin Salem on Feb 12, 2009 8:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think Walker's done a fine job...
Dockery I’m not so sure about.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 13, 2009 9:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
my stance the whole time has been....
The Bills should never stop listening to offers. Many teams are willing to overpay for a LT and if we could strike a huge deal, there are many ways that it could make this team better. He is going to require a huge financial commitment which is even more amplified in a small market like Buffalo. I just feel that last season he showed some things that would make you question making that commitment. The line will certainly not be better in his absence, but if sacrificing him meant getting much better at 2 or 3 positions in the future, I would have to certainly contemplate making the move.
Don't forget to pay the troll toll...
by evdawg419 on Feb 12, 2009 8:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
There are articles on the web that say the left tackle is the second highest paid position on a team now behind quarterback. Recent drafts bear that out and this years draft only adds to that thinking. In all probability there will be four OT’s selected in the first 15 picks. Lawrence Taylor redefined the LB position and Jonathan Ogden redefined the left tackle position and its importance.
everything goes better with a BIG MACK
by keuka121 on Feb 12, 2009 8:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I admire the fact that you took a step back and reconsidered your position
But the examples you gave really don’t say or prove anything. Football IS the ultimate team sport. It requires all 11 players executing at the same time. A team of 11 mediocre athletes that execute well as a team would do better than a few super stars mixed in with a few really bad players, that really drag down the team.
There is no doubt that Jason Peters is on his way to becoming an elite LT and we would be idiots to let him go. LT’s are so difficult to come by, teams that have them – never let them get away. The fact that the line around Peters was not great is not a reason to accept mediocrity. For the most part our O-Line has the potential of being great, Peters, Butler & Walker are keepers for sure. The Center was so weak that it might have affected the play of the guards so it’s tough to tell but I suspect that upgrading the Center position will yield great results. We might also need to replace/upgrade Dockery because his production is far inferior to his pay level.
We are a Center & FB away of having a great running team and a TE & Receiver away from having a very decent Passing offense, why would we want to risk that? We are in a position to address at least 3 of those needs in this year’s draft – I’d hate to be discussing how badly we need a LT next year should we let our guy get away.
We have the 5th most cap space in the league and yet we are actually debating signing Peters? Ralph is rubbing off on many buffalo fans! The way Peters went about his business last season was not very nice but then again he was following his agent’s advice. Also consider how short their career can be, I’m thinking of Tony Boselli whose career was cut short to 7 years – you never know. It’s a business and Peters is absolutely right to want to get a new deal that brings him closer to a top LT.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
Section 336 Row 13
by keysh67 on Feb 12, 2009 9:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
But the examples you gave really don’t say or prove anything.
Thankfully, I admitted as much.
We are a Center & FB away of having a great running team and a TE & Receiver away from having a very decent Passing offense, why would we want to risk that?
Haha, so what you’re saying is that we have 7/11 (63%) of a good offense! How is it “risking” anything if moving Peters allows us to fill 2-3 needs and thus come closer to having a better all-around offense? You lost me with this argument.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2009 6:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I still stand by the belief that a center and FB would not have made that goalline attack elite. There’s other problems up front during those situations, imo.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 13, 2009 7:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I remain convinced
That we are 4 players short of something quite decent. As you mentionned, the cohesiveness of the offensive unit is important and we won’t know until we have 11 players worthy of being on that field playing together. We know for sure that our center play was extremely weak, which probably affected the guard play quite a bit. If we were only weak at RT it would be painfully obvious but a weak center affects the whole line. OBD has ignored this for too long and now we are discussing letting our probowl LT walk? I’m sorry but I cannot believe that so many Rumblers would be willing to let him walk. He is arguably the most athletic LT in the league and he has not even come close to his potential yet, he has so much un-tapped potential, how the hell can we think of letting him walk?
So many Rumblers are so adamant about proving the importance of getting a strong pass-rush, how it can determine the outcome of games. Well we have a guy that can neutralize those “ultimate” pass-rushing artists and we want to let him go??
I’ll admit that my argument was a bit weak because we are probably short 2 receivers & a guard but I do firmly believe that you were absolutely dead on in your article when you said:
Building a good, cohesive offensive attack is about finding a harmonic relationship between quarterback play, line play, and execution
This is very true and our Oline has not had a true Center since they slapped all that money at it. Upgrade that position and I am convinced that our line will be vastly improved.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
Section 336 Row 13
by keysh67 on Feb 13, 2009 8:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m sorry but I cannot believe that so many Rumblers would be willing to let him walk
You seem to be equating “letting walk” with “not getting anything in return”. I think the majority of us would only be down with moving Peters if it was a deal that would net us multiple draft picks (I think anyone expecting two first-rounders is a bit delusional) or a pick and a player. It’s not like we’d be creating a hole and then having to fill it with our current arsenal of ammo…
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2009 8:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
4 players and a HC and OC with the ability to get the best out of them and win games….
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 13, 2009 10:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
with Kelsay being cut
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Feb 13, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Offense only
I’m keeping Kelsay out of this
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 13, 2009 12:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I HATE the money/short career arguments. If 90% of working people made $1,000,000 a year for 7 years, they’d be pretty well set for life. Sure, they couldn’t have a Ferrari for every garage at every home on every island, but imagine for a minute how different things would be to have the opportunity to earn even $3,000,000 for ONE year, when performing on the job for only 6 months!
If these guys would take a step back and realize just how much money a mil+ is per year, they’d probably be more humble.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 13, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I realize what you're saying
and I certainly do not agree with where professional athlete salaries have gone either but it is reality. If we want to compete as a team we need to spend the money to get the right athletes. We have a lot of cap room so there is no reason not to sign him and move on.
The only way we stop the crazy curve of salaries is to stop supporting the NFL and stop going to games. As much as I hate the amounts they get paid to what comes down to a game… I certainly am not ready to boycott the sport.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
Section 336 Row 13
by keysh67 on Feb 13, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
100% sign him
Jason Peters is the best player in our football team. Hands down in my opinion. His run blockomg is un-frickin- believable, and his pass blocking is very very good. Not all the sacks he gave up were his fault, something that numbers can’t always show. He pancakes guys left and right I love it.
So what if he didn’t show up to training camp. He is one of the best left tackles in the NFL and the Bills are not paying him. He played anyway… Idk why everyone is so bitter. It was in HIS best interest to holdout. I would expect him to hold out again unless he gets a deal.
Oh my, could you imagine if the did what all the complaining bills fans want to do? Sign Cowher to a huge deal, get rid of peters, draft a center, get rid of terrence mcgee, get rid of donte whitner, get rid of perry and turk and get some guys that cost more money, fire Tom Modrak, get rid of Kelsay, draft Eric Wood.
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.
- Plato
by buffaloboy90 on Feb 12, 2009 10:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Back the train up...
Nobody wants to get rid of Modrak at least nobody I’ve read. He’s probably the best football mind in the draft room.
I am not an advocate of trading Peters but with the “delusional” offer of two first-round picks how could you say no? I think maybe a dozen players in this league are worth 2 first-rounders so if we got that for him we would have to at least consider it.
Oh my, could you imagine if the did what all the complaining bills fans want to do? Sign Cowher to a huge deal, get rid of peters, draft a center, get rid of terrence mcgee, get rid of donte whitner, get rid of perry and turk and get some guys that cost more money, fire Tom Modrak, get rid of Kelsay, draft Eric Wood.
If we signed Cowher our team would be better.
Getting rid of Peters could make us better if we got the right number and value of picks.
Draft a center (Wood or someone else) would make us better.
Get rid of Kelsay and Whitner would allow us cap space to sign players better than them so it would make us better
Nobody is advocating getting rid of McGee unless we re-sign Jabari Greer. Of the entire list the only one that doesn’t make us better, outside of the crazy Modrak thing, is getting rid of McGee. How silly of us for wanting to improve the team.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 13, 2009 9:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure where BB90 gets the “complaining” crap. Nobody here is complaining.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2009 9:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jason Peters is the best player in our football team
i think Lynch is
Maybe now you'll never slime a guy with a positron collider
by J2 on Feb 13, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If the Bills draft Brown, Maybin, Orakpo, Jerry, Raji, or Kruger (new to my list) in the first round I will be happy with the entire Bills team.
There I said it!
Everyone just needs to realize that we are young at key positions. QB and WR.
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.
- Plato
by buffaloboy90 on Feb 12, 2009 10:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
SO you're happy starting Chris "4 sacks" Kelsay?
Keith Ellison? Your list means we have no center on the roster. Donte Whitner and his anemic secondary play.
We are young at key positions but we suck at other ones.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 13, 2009 9:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, Kelsay got 4 sacks?! Dude’s a stud.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 13, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
4.5 total in the past 2 seasons…..
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 13, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone here is MISSING THE POINT(S)!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It would help if we had a competent center who could make the right calls AND actually handle a DT one on one. There isn’t really a leader on the offensive line and the C is the leader of every offensive line.
Simply put, Peters is one of the best “up and coming” talents at LT. Peters is a freak of nature as an athlete at his position and he has very quick feet with great size. This all being said, he had a TERRIBLE year this past year. He missed training camp, all of the OTA’s and like 2 games. Not too mention he was lazy and didn’t flat out show up on some plays.
SIGN HIM and GET A BETTER CENTER
The time to deliver is now and if you fail to do so you will no doubt witness the consequences first hand.
by Cutter3636 on Feb 12, 2009 11:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think anyone is debating the desperate need for a Center upgrade. This article is about Peters, and Peters only. Has nothing to do with a new C….
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 13, 2009 12:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
God, thank you, K.
I’m not sure why people are reading this as me wanting to trade Peters. That’s not necessarily true. I just want the team to explore every avenue to putting a better product on the field.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2009 6:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll tell you where I have a problem
shop him and negotiate with him.
He deserves a new deal and everyone knows it. I did not agree with his tactics last season but he did deserve to make more than Dock/Walker so I kinda understand how the situation came about. It’s a business pure and simple. He is one injury from never playing again (See Boselli) so put yourself in his shoes.. again I don’t agree with the tactics he used but I definitely understand why he did it.
Now coming back to the point in question, shopping him publicly makes it way tougher to resign him. What message does that send him? A ton of other teams would line up for him, which will boost his price and that’s hoping that he doesn’t decide to leave on his own and why shouldn’t he? If a few of the perennial contenders are active in the process he then knows that he could be playing on a winning team instead of the penny pinching Bills.. You only shop him if you are decided to off load him otherwise show him the love he desperately is seeking and move on!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
Section 336 Row 13
by keysh67 on Feb 13, 2009 8:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
shopping him publicly makes it way tougher to resign him.
Who the heck said anything about doing it publicly?! :)
NFL teams can be covert enough to make inquiries about the value of a player without putting him on the trading block.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2009 8:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Leave on his own...
Peters can’t leave on his own for two more years until after the 2010 season.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 13, 2009 9:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I beg to differ...
When Brian talked about “cohesive offensive attack”
Many rumblers have talked about Peter “me-first” attitude. But cohesiveness is also gained by having a strong line without a glaring hole right up the middle!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
Section 336 Row 13
by keysh67 on Feb 13, 2009 8:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
OK, but still, no one is debating the need for a center. That was K’s main point.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2009 8:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
“he was lazy and didn’t flat out show up on some plays.”
Not the words used to describe elite talent, in my book.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 13, 2009 11:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He's not an "elite" player
I have also reluctantly come to the “trade him” position. The events of the 2008 season could not have gone worse for the Bills when it comes to Peters: lengthy holdout (equals poor prep and bad attitude), very bad execution of the critical LT task of “protect the QB (any QB,) another losing record and, worst, Peters somehow gets selected for the pro bowl. Couldn’t someone demand a recount? I believe to be an "elite” player you have to elevate the play of all those around you. No one can claim Peters elevated the play of Dockery.
by jpheff on Feb 13, 2009 10:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
A bit of a contrived example, but...
This is why I think Bill Belichick is one of the greatest assests the game has ever seen. He exemplifies elite and you can see it in the scrubs on that team that produce like studs.
Then there’s Jim Leonard on the Ravens. Ed Reed makes him look like the second coming of Ronnie Lott at critical points in the game (please excuse the hyperbole).
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 13, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



























