Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Projecting Bills RB Jackson's potential contract demands


RB Jackson seeking long-term extension (Associated Press)

In case you vacated planet earth about a week ago and made your return journey this morning, Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch was arrested and charged with felony possession of a concealed firearm last week.  Oh, and there was marijuana in the car, too.  The two-year pro will appear in court in California on April 2, and although rumors are indicating that Lynch might not be considered a repeat offender of the NFL's personal conduct policy, it's anything but certain that Lynch will be available to the Bills for a full sixteen games next season.

Backup running back Fred Jackson, an exclusive rights free agent, has made a name for himself over the past two seasons playing second fiddle to Lynch.  In those two seasons, Jackson has accrued 1,378 yards from scrimmage and three scores despite averaging just over 120 touches per season.  Already one of the team's most versatile and consistent performers - offensively and in general - Jackson was in line for a lengthy and lucrative contract extension before Lynch's second run-in with the law.

With increased negotiating power thanks to the unfortunate circumstance his running mate finds himself in, Buffalo would be wise to give Jackson the extension he seeks sooner rather than later.

Projecting Jackson's potential contract demands
Jackson will turn 28 in just two days' time (and we here at Buffalo Rumblings sincerely wish Action Jackson an early and hearty 'happy birthday'), making him barely worthy of 'spring chicken' status by NFL standards.  (Sorry, Fred.)  Still, if you're aware of Jackson's unusual route to the NFL, he's got far less wear on his proverbial tires than most backs his age at this level.  He has little left to prove in terms of professional demeanor, work ethic and consistency.  Few players are sounder investments.

For all of the underrated value Jackson has given his team over the past two seasons, he's barely scraped half a million dollars for his efforts.  Simply put, no Bill is more worthy of a contract extension than Jackson.

But how much should Jackson make?  Keeping in mind the fact that Jackson will still likely be nothing more than the Bills' #1A back next season, there are at least four runners with similar backgrounds to Jackson that have signed extensions within the past two years.  Those players are...

Vikings RB Chester Taylor (2006): 4 years, $14.1 million
Raiders RB Justin Fargas (2008): 3 years, $12 million, $6 million guaranteed
Buccaneers RB Earnest Graham (2008): 4 years, $11.05 million
Packers RB Ryan Grant (2008): 4 years, $20 million, $4 million guaranteed

The deals that Oakland's Fargas and Green Bay's Grant signed are the most relevant here, mostly because they're the two most recent signings.  It's important to note, also, that Fargas signed his extension four months after the Raiders spent a fourth overall pick on RB Darren McFadden.  Jackson and his agent are likely targeting those two deals as leverage points for their negotiations with the Bills.

The four-year deals are trendy here, and considering Jackson's age, that's probably the ideal contract length for Buffalo.  Grant signed his deal knowing that he would be Green Bay's starter, but based only on half a season's worth of production, while Fargas signed his deal after proving himself to be a worthy #1A back.  At least a $4 million annual salary seems likely here (and that's reportedly what Giants RB Derrick Ward is seeking as well), but don't be shocked if the Bills give Jackson a bit more in guaranteed cash than is typified above.

My best guess (and it's meant only as a starting point for our discussions here): 4 years, $18 million with $8 million guaranteed would be the starting point of Jackson's negoations from Jackson's end.  Jackson deserves a bit more guaranteed for making diddly squat over the past two seasons (consider it a performance bonus, if you will), but the contract is short enough for the franchise that it protects them against Jackson's age catching up with him quickly.  Action Jackson is worth every penny of that type of deal, in my opinion; of course, obviously if you're the Bills, you try to talk him down from those figures (and you've certainly got sufficient leverage to do so). You're more than welcome to make your own counter-offers (and counterpoints) to this argument.  Take it away, folks.

0 recs  |  Comment 104 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Pay the man

If OBD is serious about building their team with quality people and players that can actually play, then they need to get Jackson signed. I have no problem with giving him 4 yr. $20MM total with $8mm – $10mm guaranteed. He has proven to be a valuable commodity on this team and with Lynch being a ? at this point it needs to be done.
I wasn’t on the “bring in another back” bandwagon before but now with the situation OBD is presented with it might be a good idea, either later in the draft or through FA.

by gatornation on Feb 18, 2009 7:59 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I kind of did just get out from under a rock....

but 4M per seems high for me. As you stated Ryan Grant was signed to be Green Bay’s number 1 guy so I throw his numbers off the chart. Fargas then becomes the only 4M per and we have exclusive negotiating rights with Action Jackson.

Best guess from me: 4 years, $14M, $6M guaranteed, with performance bonuses that can top it out at 4.5M a year or something like that.

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 8:17 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

The lower the better. But I don’t think Jackson asking for $4M per season is as crazy as you think. Ward played the same type of role in New York, and that’s what he’s seeking. Why would Jackson ask for less just because he can’t negotiate with other teams?

The Bills might be able to talk him down from that $4M per figure, and that’d be great if they do. But I also think giving Jackson a deal similar to or slightly higher than Lynch’s 6-year, $19 million, $10 million guaranteed would send #23 a pretty valuable message.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 8:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He should be asking for $4M.

He deserves it. But even with Marshawn’s indiscretions he has very little leverage.

As for Marshawn’s contract, I like your thought process here I just don’t know if Lynch would get the message. It’s a little too subtle for him.

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 8:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ward played the same type of role in New York, and that’s what he’s seeking. Why would Jackson ask for less just because he can’t negotiate with other teams?

Brian, I think you are getting way too ahead of yourself on this issue. I love Fred Jackson and he deserves an extension but there is no way he deserves as much money as Ward. Quick stat comparison:

Ward: 2008 – 1,025 rushing yards, 5.7 avg, 2 TDs, 41 receptions, 384 receiving yards, 0 TDs
2007 – 602 rushing yards, 4.2 avg, 3 TDs, 26 receptions, 179 receiving yards, 1 TD

Jackson: 2008 – 571 yards, 4.4 avg, 3 TDs, 37 receptions, 317 receiving yards, 0 TDs
2007 – 300 rushing yards, 5.2 avg, 0 TDs, 22 receptions, 190 receiving yards, 0 TDs

I love Fred as much as anyone but to even throw up contract numbers like Fargas and what Ward is looking for is to forget that they are 1,000 yard rushers and Jackson is not. I think he is better than both of them and would keep him on my team but he doesn’t have leverage. I say give him less than $4 mil.

If we can finagle DE Brian Orakpo and C Alex Mack I will not complain about this team for a whole season. I promise.

by poz on Feb 18, 2009 3:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL. You say I’m getting way too ahead of myself, then come back with “I say give him less than $4 mil”? :P

Again – this is all about what Jackson will likely ask for. You said yourself that you think Jackson is better than both. It’s very likely that his agent has convinced him of that as well. Why wouldn’t he look at those deals and say “I’m worth what they’re worth”??

Yes, he’ll probably end up making less than that. But the post was “contract demands”, not “eventual negotiating middle ground”. :)

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 3:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I got five bucks that says you wish the title of this article was paid attention to more…

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 4:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

:)

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 4:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What if the Bills Play Hardball with Jackson?

Jackson’s asking for $4 million is very reasonable given the level of RB compensation in the NFL. I just hope the dimwitts at OBD see it as a reasonable request also.

by gjv on Feb 18, 2009 8:34 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

hardball would entail tendering him at the lowest level...

then Jackson can choose to sit out OTAs, and maybe part of training camp or whatever. They aren’t going to do that. If the Bills play hardball-lowball with Jackson, it’s gonna piss a lot of people off. That’s not how you attract people to your organization. Now if the lowball offer comes with a lot of incentives or a willingness to compromise, that’s a good system.

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 8:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

For the record, that’s pretty much what happened with Ryan Grant last year, too. He sat out voluntary spring workouts, then Green Bay ramped up negotiations prior to training camp to get him in. I’m pretty sure he signed his deal last August.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

August 5th...

I looked it up but good memory Bri-guy.

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 9:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

… Bri-guy?

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

it rhymes....

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 9:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, and it’s also vetoed. :)

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

point taken

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Found a nickname you like less than Brain.

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 18, 2009 9:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Who says I don’t like Brain? It’s flattering.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

fred-ex or Bri-guy....

which is worse?

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Both suck equally.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 11:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

what a cop out answer.

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Is it a cop out or brutal truth?

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty much everyone I know except for my family calls me BG, so I’m cool with that.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

k you got it Big Guy.......

lol

12/19/08 - Thank you KLJ for coming into my life.

by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 18, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve called you that before. What a lucky guess…

And for the record, anyone who refers to me as “kry,” well, that’s spot on as well. That’s the shortened nickname from a long polack last name.

[feel free to insert polish jokes here]

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 1:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I knew there was a reason I liked you :-)

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 18, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree completely

I think allot of people in the fanbase as well as in the organization would be pissed if they try to play hardball and not reward Fast Freddie. They have shown over the past few offseasons that they reward those players that they think play well, i.e. Chris Kelsay.

     Although I would love for Freddie to get paid a good amount of money (up to 4 mil/year) we also have a lot of other needs and thus I think something in the 2 mil/ year range would be fair.

by LanceinDE on Feb 18, 2009 9:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You know who else gets paid in the $2 million/year range? Robert Royal. I can imagine Jackson putting his Hancock on a contract that pays him $2 million per year, but I can’t imagine him being happy with it.

I’ll say it again – keep your players happy, particularly the ones that have talent and do things the right way.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think that's a little bit high...

But not to far off. I think you’re spot on with the length. I’m inclined to lean towards MRW’s numbers.

I can’t wait to see the argument you and Kurupt get into on this. My guess is it’ll start in about a half an hour. He’s been on record as saying Jackson should get close to the minimum, as he has no leverage.

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 8:42 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Jackson has zero leverage... except his ability.

The Bills can give him peanuts and he can’t go negotiate anywhere else. But that’s not what they should do.

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 9:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And Buffalo absolutely can’t let another holdout happen, particularly at this position or with Jason Peters. Jackson has more leverage than people think.

This article wasn’t meant to be a “give Jackson this much” point, it was a “Jackson will ask for this” point. (Hence the word “demands”.) It’s high because Jackson and his agent will aim high. I think Buffalo would be wise to give him whatever he wants, because they need some stability offensively.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We should have waited two days to do this. It’s his birthday on the 20th, happy 28th Freddy, but I think I have some bad news for him.

Jackson may ask for this much money, but I will be shocked if Buffalo gives it to him. I don’t think any of those guys are a relevant comparison to what kind of leverage Jackson has.

Ryan Grant was an ERFA, but he was also coming off a season where he almost had a 1,000 yards and averaged over 5 yards per carry. He scored 8 TDs in the last 8 games of the regular season and then went off in the first round of the playoffs and basically won the game on his own as he ran for 200 yards on 27 carries (7.4 ypa) and scored 3 times. Green Bay had nobody else on the roster and going from obscurity to a starter who changes the way you do things on offense as opposed to going from obscurity to a great backup is totally different.

Chester Taylor was signed away from Baltimore in unrestricted free agency and to be the starter.

Ernest Graham was a restricted free agent who had well over 200 carries and was the team’s starting runningback. 10 TDs is a pretty good bargaining chip. Graham was holding out from the team’s OTAs and offseason stuff and the Bucs only had Warrick Dunn as the other viable running back on the roster.

Fargas was the starter when he got that contract. He was signed well before the 08 draft when they took McFadded and before Michael Bush established himself as an NFL back. He was also coming off a 222 carry, 1,009 yard season (4.5 per carry).

Fred Jackson still doesn’t have 200 CAREER carries.

None of those teams had 1/4 of the leverage that Buffalo has in these negotiations. Jackson is an ERFA this year and with the bargaining agreement set to end, an ERFA next offseason too. That will make him a RFA after the 2011 season. If Buffalo wanted to play hardball (obviously they won’t play to this extent) they could pay Jackson a grand total of 2.5 mil over the next 3 seasons! My guess (and hope) is that Jackson gets stuck here for another 3-4 seasons at about 2 mil per year with incentives that could bump that up almost another mil per year.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 9:12 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

My bad, that should read an RFA after the 2010 season and the 2011 offseason.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 9:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I changed my mind.

I now like a number somewhere between what you just mentioned and MRW.

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 9:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There is one other comparison that can be made, and perhaps you’ll find it more appealing: New England signed Sammy Morris as a backup (though it was still UFA) to a 4-year, $7 million deal with I believe $2.25 million in guarantees and bonuses.

Honestly, I think if your expectations are that low, you’re not taking into account just how much the team likes Fred Jackson. He does everything the right way. Why would they low-ball him – just to prove their might and uphold the integrity of the bargaining power of the ERFA status? I doubt it. They’ll pay Jackson fairly, because he deserves to be paid fairly.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

not to mention his contributions in the return game.

He is a good guy to have in the locker room and on the field.

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 9:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope they don’t low ball him, but I also hope they don’t pay him something that would be considered outrageous for the position (back-up RB).

In a rare I can say “I told you so” moment, I do recall saying Jackson should have been extended last off-season, and my comments were met with some barbs from you guys. He would have been so much cheaper back then.

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 9:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The only reason your comments were met with “barbs” was because he was a one-year player. He’d been a solid backup for half a season. Props to you for the foresight on Jackson’s playing abilities, but re-signing him at that point would have been crazy. :)

I don’t consider Jackson a backup, by the way. I call him a #1A for a reason. He plays a lot. He’s something less than a starter, but far more than a backup.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He’s number two on the depth chart and got half as many carries as Lynch did despite Marshawn missing a game and some stretches of other games with injuries. I think it’s safe to call Jackson a backup. A very important backup, maybe, but a backup.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK, but can’t Jackson correctly make the argument that a) he should have more playing time, b) he does more for the overall benefit of the team than Lynch, and c) he’s potentially going to be the #1 back for a quarter of next season?

He’s a #1A. Particularly after Lynch’s mess. The Bills would be stupid to consider him anything less than that.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you just hand the ball back to Lynch if Jackson has been tearing it up and helping win games? I think this situation is going to get verrrrrrrry interesting.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 18, 2009 9:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, Lynch would have to get suspended first for that scenario to play out, and that hasn’t happened yet. So that remains hypothetical – and the Bills will certainly use that line in negotiations.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My whole point to that then, and always, is to be pro-active when it comes to building your team. I’m surely not saying I recognized him as a stud, but I did recognize him as a player who I thought should have been kept around.

I always say try and sign your young guys cheap and early. You save so much. Sure, you might strike out once in a awhile, but the benefits outweigh the negatives if you ask me.

For the record, I loved what they Bills did with Butler and Williams last year. That was smart.

Agreed about Jackson and the 1A thing. I think he wasn’t on the field enough last year.

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 9:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jackson has better vision and hands than Lynch

And, he is not an idiot pot head who needs a wet nurse. Pay Jackson 1A money because he proven he is worth it last year. This season, do you think he will be on the field more or less?

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 18, 2009 9:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Again, this is just my opinion, and y’all are giving me a lot of heat for it here, but I’m paying Jackson 1A money because I’m making him my 1A back. Split his carries evenly. I’m a big proponent of a two-back system, but really, Jackson’s kind of been stuffed into a 1.5-back system.

I think he should be in a 60-40 system with Lynch. Right now, it’s more like 75-25.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think 2 mil a season with some incentives is lowballing him. I think Buffalo has such a huge advantage in the negotiations that 8 mil (a lot of which would be guaranteed) would practically be a gift. If Buffalo really wants to, they could get him cheaper than that Sammy Morris contract.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 9:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If Buffalo really wants to, they could get him cheaper than that Sammy Morris contract.

Why would they want to? I don’t understand giving a guy a cheap-ass contract just because you can. Jackson is one of the few good things this team has going for it. Keep the man satisfied!

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not saying they would want to, I’m just saying that paying Jackson 2 mil (2.5 mil after incentives) isn’t a lowball considering how much leverage they have.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 9:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s a lowball if it’s not going to keep Fred satisfied. I can’t imagine a scenario where Jackson is giddy about signing a deal worth $2M annually. He and the Bills both know he’s worth more than that.

If the Bills can supplement that type of deal with cars, Snickers bars, whatever else to keep Jackson satisfied, great. But it’s pointless to create another awkward situation with a player when we’ve got enough of those at the moment. I don’t give a rip about ERFA, negotiating power, etc., even though I obviously believe Jackson has a lot more leverage than everyone else here thinks. You pay the man fairly.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brian,

I could agree more. It is very possible Jackson will be our feature RB for a good part of this season. Pay him fairly now!

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 18, 2009 10:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wish my income was supplimented with bourbon.

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 1:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jackson should be happy with 2+ mil a year. It is what players of his experience, success, past, current and likely future role make in the league. I think the 4 players you mention are all pretty bad comparisons. They were all signed to be feature running backs who get 15-25 touches per game. I know that isn’t the role they all have now, but that was what they were when they signed the contract. All had more experience than Jackson. Even Grant was coming off a much better season than Jackson’s 2 pro years combined. Go back and look at how many running backs get that many carries (Grant had 188 in 2007) and average over 5 yards per carry. There are only one or two guys who do it every year. I think the contract that you pointed out with Sammy Morris is closer to what Jackson’s role and ability is. Chris Brown got a 2 year 3.6 mil contract after having a 102 carry, 462 yard, 5 TD, 19 catch season. Dominic Rhodes got 2.5ish mil per season (with a lot of incentives) after being a backup/1a to Joseph Addai when they won the Super Bowl and was signed to split time with LaMont Jordan.

I also think Fred Jackson’s leverage (or lack there of) has to be considered in what fair is. It’s like in baseball when players are in their arbitration years and teams give them long term contracts that are more than they would typically get at that stage of their careers, but the team gets to keep them under contract for a couple extra seasons before they are unrestricted. It is Fred Jackson’s union that agreed to this system where a player early in their career gets stuck with no negotiating power, but gets to go crazy when they finally hit unrestricted free agency. If Fred Jackson has a problem with how little leverage he has and the fact that he is going to make less money in this negotiation then if he could negotiate with other teams, he should take it up with his union and not with the Bills.

I think where we really disagree is what would make Jackson happy. I think the fact that Buffalo could make him play for $460,000, but will instead give him a check for a couple mil in addition to that 460K should make him happy. I think that Jackson should be pretty happy with a contract that puts incentives into things because he has never had a deal like that. He could easily be making 550K in 2010, but with a new contract will be getting a raise of 1.5 mil. Remember that this guy has been making peanuts his whole adult life and was excited just a couple of years ago to make the roster so he could make a few hundred thousand dollars. I guess I’m viewing this more like the way you would negotiate an extension where Jackson is essentially under contract for a few seasons and Buffalo is giving him a nice raise to keep him happy. It is basically what Buffalo did with Butler. He was still under contract through 2009 and Buffalo gave him a nice raise in a 8.8 mil, three year extension that turned his 2 years remaining years at about a combined mil into a 5 year 10 mil contract.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

let'

Fred Jackson is a very good football player, but the facts remain: He has little leverage, since he’s ERFA, which of course means that he’ll either retire, get traded (which isn’t happening unless someone offers a second rounder) or play for the Bills. The Bills certainly love Fred, but let’s not go nuts here, like Brian is doing imo. He’s a very good backup; he can carry the load to a certain degree like we saw against Denver and New England, but he’s still backup, who gets 15-20 % (at most) of the running carries against Marshawn’s 80-85 %. If we go out and give him 4,5 million dollars a year to a 28-year-old backup RB, that is not a good idea.

I think he should get a four-year 14 million dollar deal with six million dollars in guarenteed money, where the deal is heavily front-loaded like with Lee (meaning that he makes a lot now, but peanuts when he turns 31 and 32.)

by BillsfanfromDenmark on Feb 18, 2009 9:31 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

wow… those figures look dead on. :-)

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Bills certainly love Fred, but let’s not go nuts here, like Brian is doing imo.

Again… this is a “contract demands” piece, i.e. what Jackson will ask for. Obviously you try to talk him down from the $4.5 million per year I posited. You get the cheapest deal possible without causing problems between yourself and one of your most valuable players.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Does anyone have a list of the top thirty two paid RBs?

I’d be interested to see that, if someone has it.

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 9:33 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

http://content.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/salaries/playersbyposition.aspx?pos=131

There is a list of everyone’s 08 cap hit. It isn’t really the highest paid players, but its something.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 9:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah I looked it up on there...

the salaries fro the top 32 are all 900k and over…. but guys like Jacobs, and Ward are in line for a pay raise

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2009 9:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Kaiser.

I’d love to know what LT and Westbrook did for those respective $720 and $480 bonuses.

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 9:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Any one know who his agent is?

I’m thinking he has a nobody for an agent, as I’ve never heard anything mentioned about it.

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 9:46 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

$4-5M per season for a 28 year old backup RB? Yeah, that just doesn’t seem like the wisest move, IMO.

I just don’t see how you can give a contract like that to a backup RB even if he’s a good, hardworking guy that has some value for the team. Lynch’s off the field transgressions should have nothing to do with Jackson’s contract. I didn’t see other teams going out and signing their backups to big contracts when a starter got in trouble or hurt. Why should the Bills?

If Jackson had ANY leverage, I’d see how it’s possible, but he doesn’t. I don’t want the team to lowball him, say $600K per year or something, but I also don’t want them handing out starter’s money to a backup, because that’s what Jackson is. I would be offering him a 4 year $10-11M deal, maybe with some incentives thrown in. I just can’t fathom giving a $4.5M a year contract to a guy that might get 5-10 carries a game. Remember, prior to the NE season ender, Jackson only had double digit carries 4 times last year….

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Feb 18, 2009 9:46 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I’m gonna go ahead and change the wording in the article now, because everyone is getting the wrong idea about this. :)

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You said 4 years $18M is the perfect deal for both sides. What needs to change?!?!?

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Feb 18, 2009 9:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The fact that I’m not saying the Bills should offer that. What I meant is that that figure is a ballpark starting point from Jackson’s end, and if I were Buffalo, I’d give it to him. Obviously, the Bills will negotiate down.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

At least a $4 million annual salary seems likely here …… but don’t be shocked if the Bills give Jackson a bit more in guaranteed cash than is typified above.

This is what I really disagree with and is basically the same sentiment as the title of the article. I don’t think the title is what is causing everyone to disagree.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 7:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

… I’m confused. Are you disagreeing about me saying Jackson will ask for at least $4 million in annual salary, or the bit about the Bills wanting to give Jackson a bit more guaranteed than is normal?

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 8:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I read that as you guessing that Jackson would be signed for that, not that he would start the negotiations there.

My bad, I guess that I, like everyone else, totally took what you were trying to say in the article the wrong way.

But that begs the question, what do you think Jackson will eventually sign for and will that number be more or less than he deserves?

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 9:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the team will give him what he deserves. I think it’ll be at least 4 years, at least $2.5 million per season, and include at least $5 million in guarantees.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thats not bad then. I would go a little lower, but I certainly wouldn’t complain about a contract like that.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 10:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: "I would be offering him a 4 year $10-11M deal"

Where does that come from K? You’ve been saying all along a million tops. Now you’re up to 2.5?

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 9:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Have i? Well, I change my stance a bit. If they don’t want to give him a longer deal, then give him a smaller, prove it deal before RFA status next year. Maybe that number is even higher than I’d like, but if the team wants to be fair, then I can understand the $2-3M per year. Something closer to $1m a year is much better to me than almost $5M per season. Can’t I go with that?!?!?!?!

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Feb 18, 2009 9:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes you can. I was just busting your chops, deservedly I might add.

by krytime on Feb 18, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Under the rules of what is going to happen with the uncapped year, Jackson would be an ERFA again next offseason and a RFA during the 2011 offseason. You could give him a 2 year prove it contract and he could still be a RFA if there isn’t a new bargaining agreement before that.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 7:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is not about leverage

If you are the Bills you are making a statement to Jackson and to Lynch.

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 18, 2009 10:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It should be about leverage. It should be about business. It should be about winning football games by signing guys to as cheap of contracts as you can so you have money left to sign free agents and make the team better. Players always say they understand that things are just business when they get traded, released, don’t get extended or whatever. Jackson will have to understand that he doesn’t get the same things that unrestricted free agents do because he isn’t an unrestricted free agent; in fact, he isn’t even close to being one.

And what exactly does giving Jackson MORE money per season than Lynch actaully accomplish other than making your starting running back feel underpaid? How has nobody brought up that Marshawn makes 3.5 mil per season? I don’t think you can pay Jackson more than Lynch.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 7:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What makes you think Lynch is still the starting RB????

Do you think he will be on the field in Sept? Oct ? If Jackson is leading the league in all purpose yards, do you give Lynch is job back? Or, do you pat your self on the back for having the foresight to extend Jackson for “backup” money and trade Lynch’s pot smoking, drunk driving, dumb @$$!!!! When, Lynch gets back on the field , I will root for the team to do well. But, he has done the impossible by replacing Peters as the biggest @$$ on the team.

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 18, 2009 7:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I will be shocked if Lynch isn’t in a Bills uniform next year and very surprised if he gets suspended for more than 2 games.

I don’t think his current legal troubles are that big of a deal. Wow marijuana? Pot basically isn’t a crime anymore in NY or California and even if Lynch was arrested for it, the crime would be a $100 ticket in CA and would be immediately dismissed in NY. As long as Lynch doesn’t fail a drug test and get suspended that way, then I don’t care if he smokes.

A gun in his trunk? Big freakin deal, I don’t think Goodell is going to come down hard on that considering that it was in his trunk and there are more players in the NFL who own a gun then players that don’t. Sure it was stupid to own it without a permit, but as long as he can convince Goodell that he doesn’t carry it around with him and it was only in the trunk then I think he might not get suspended at all.

If people still hate Marshawn because of the hit and run then I get that. It was terrible. But I honestly don’t think any of this is that big of a deal.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 7:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, this isn’t really about Lynch. Whether he’s suspended or not, he’s not going anywhere, and he’s going to be our #1 running back next season. That really shouldn’t even be a question.

But as I said above, Jackson should have more of Lynch’s workload.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 8:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So is that how you would explain it to your 12 year old son?

yeah, he broke a few laws, but they are not the really important ones. And, so what…..he smokes pot…he just should not have gotten caught. Here is a 12 pack of beer, a carton of Marlboro’s, a dime bag, and a gross of condoms. Have fun son!!!!!!

I had gotten over the hit and run. Everyone screws up. But this is salt in the wound. I could care less what the legal ramifications are at this point. Lynch has shown me the type of person he his. If I am wrong about him, then he is going to have to prove it my keeping his nose clean for the 12-14 months. Too much to ask, right?

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 18, 2009 9:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, like Brian said this isn’t about Lynch, but since you asked …..

I think this is just part of being a fan of the NFL. Just in the last week Gerald Sensabrough, Ahmad Bradshaw, Jeff Reed, Curtis DeLoach, Albert Haynesworth and Freddie Mitchell have all been in the news related to something illegal they have done and Larry Izzo is about to testify about how he did steriods. Every team is going to have players who run into trouble and do stupid things. People freak out about stories like this, but they blow over so quickly. You said it yourself, that you are already over the hit and run. If you ask me, that was 50 times worse then this and something I will never fully forgive him for. I guess I can just seperate what Marshawn does on the field vs. what he does off the field and the way both of those things impact my life. On the field he matters, I am happy when the Bills win and sad when they lose. Off the field, I don’t really care, my day tomorrow won’t be all that much different than a day I had a week ago and Marshawn won’t have much impact on either of them other than the fact that I have wasted a bunch of downtime talking about it.

Lynch had a gun in his trunk. I don’t think that’s tough to explain to a kid. He owns a gun, a lot of people own a gun. There was just one of those HBO sports shows on where Gumbel was hosting and there was a piece on NFL players and guns where Marcellus Wiley talked for a long time about how most NFL players own guns. Wiley went to Columbia, had never touched a gun in his life (so he claims) in high school or college and then carried one around in a holster everywhere he went in the NFL. Somebody on the special guessed that 80% of NFL players own guns. Marshawn is just stupid enough to not have a permit.

What would I tell my 12 year old son if he asked me whether or not Marshawn Lynch smokes weed? I would say that marijuana is a drug. I would tell him mostly the truth. That it lowers motivation, isn’t a particualrly smart thing to do, but that a lot of people try it and some people fall in love with it until they are addicted and end up working in food service their whole lives.

by kaisertown on Feb 18, 2009 11:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

good response, but not what I was getting at

I don’t root for other teams, so I really don’t care how many idiots there are on other teams. IMO, your response to what Lynch did sends a bigger message than what you say to your kid. “Do as I say, not as I do” is not an effective parenting strategy. If you separate, to this degree, what Lynch does off the field with his performance on the field, it sends the message it is OK to still cheer for him because his on the field performance is more important to you than what he does in the rest of his life. Remember the movie “The Running Man”? Where do you draw the line? I agree that the hit and run was much worse, but I was willing to give a young rookie a break. I hoped he had learned and grown from it. Guess not.

As far as weed goes. Agree with it or not, it is illegal. By taking the position that smoking weed is no big deal, you fail to take into account all of the people who have spent/given their lives trying to fight the War on Drugs. NO BIG DEAL? Try saying that to the wife and kid of an officer who was shot dead by some idiot growing pot in his backyard so Bong Mode can sit in his car and get high! Smoking weed is not some victimless crime. As long as it is illegal, It is part of the drug problem in this country.

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 19, 2009 10:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think of it as more of a “do as I say and not as Marshawn does” lesson. I don’t understand how cheering for Marshawn on the field has to be tied together with condoning his actions off the field. Would you not take your kid to see a movie with Robert Downey Jr. in it? Would you refuse to buy coffee at a place where the manager is a drunk? Marshawn has a job and what he does in his spare time doesn’t concern me until it starts to affect the way he does his job, so until he gets suspended, I don’t really care all that much. To be honest, if I were a parent I would be more concerned that Lynch is a bad stereotype than he is a bad example.

Sure Marijuana is a drug and is somewhat illegal, but in NY state having small amounts has actually been decriminalized. The normal amount that a college kid would buy doesn’t even come with a fine. In NY you are better off getting caught with a Marijuana cig than you are parking illegally. Up to an ounce can run you a ticket of up to $100. Even a third offense of being arrested with nearly an ounce (which is a lot) is still just a fine of a couple hundred dollars. If you were to get caught speeding 3 times in a few months the ramifications (legal and insurance) would be worse than if you were arrested for marijuana possesion three times in a month. You can call it a crime if you want, but it is a crime like traffic violations are crimes.

by kaisertown on Feb 19, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Depends

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 19, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

on the situation
Would you not take your kid to see a movie with Robert Downey Jr. in it? Would you refuse to buy coffee at a place where the manager is a drunk?

I am talking about how your kid would view your reaction to the situation. Lynch may not be a role model, but a parent should be. Would I take my kid into a coffee shop with a drunken manager? NO WAY! Would I tell my kid it is only breaking the law if you get caught? NO WAY! Would you park in a handicapped spot because you can afford to pay the fine? NOT ME. I have two good legs. I don’t make decisions in my life based on what I can get away with, rather on what is the right thing to do even if nobody is looking.

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 19, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well then make sure that your kid sees your reaction to Marshawn getting arrested, owning a gun, smoking weed and whatever else you think is wrong. And then when he sees you cheer for the Bills and for Marshawn on the field he won’t think that you are approving of Marshawn’s actions off the field. I don’t see why it is tough to seperate the two.

I meant if the manager had a problem with alcohol, not that he was literally drunk and stumbling around behind the counter. A better example would be if your kid knew the manager, like he was a friend’s father and it was known that he had a problem with alcohol. Would you be unwilling to let your child see you buying a coffee from him and chatting for a few seconds while he cashed you out?

When I say marijuana is illegal like speeding is illegal, I am admitting that they are both wrong, but they are the kind of everyday things that I don’t think you can really judge someone for. I don’t think marijuana, while still frowned upon, carries the same stigma both socially and legally that it did during the 80s and 90s. I never implied that marijuana is only wrong if you get caught. I would bet that it is legal and sold over the counter at pharmacys in small amounts and with sizeable taxes like cigarrettes are currently when your kids are raising their kids. I think that is the direction we are headed in both in the states and globally.

by kaisertown on Feb 19, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Already have talked to my son

We watch NFL Live together after school most every day. We have already talked about the Lynch and Vick situations.

If a friend of mine had a problem with alcohol, I would support him if he was getting help and trying to improve his life. If he insisted on engaging in destructive behavior like driving drunk, I would turn him in. I am not an enabler. Even if weed was legal, smoking it would still be bad for your health. One drink a day is proven good for your health. When the same is proven about weed, I will have my wife bake me up some “brownies”.

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 19, 2009 10:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d bet you a dollar right now Lynch wouldn’t pass a drug test.

Actually, that offer is open to anyone who reads this.

by krytime on Feb 19, 2009 12:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with alot of you guys

Jackson asks for about 4 years, 4 mil a year, and about 8 mil bonus, but

I see 4 years, 15 mil, 6 mil bonus, with an incentive if he starts 8 games or more, considering Lynch’s possible suspension or inclination to injury.

BUt either way, i hope he is a top priority. He can add even more this season as i see it and is one of my favorite Bills

The Bills CAN win every game

by killascript on Feb 18, 2009 10:25 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

what?

“The deals that Oakland’s Fargas and Green Bay’s Grant signed are the most relevant here”
   sure they were the most recently signed but Grant is a starter for green bay while Jackson is a back up. I don’t see that as being too relevant.

by jdol1568 on Feb 18, 2009 11:20 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Hence Fargas being included…

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ok but

I still don’t think you can compare a clear cut backup in fred jackson to a Justin fargas who has been juggled in and out of the starting line up and another starting running back in Ryan Grant who played superb two years ago and I believe led all second half rushers that season and had a very strong playoff performance. I love fred but i don’t see him deserving of a 4-5 mil a year deal.

by jdol1568 on Feb 18, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Again… this is what JACKSON might ask for, NOT what the Bills should offer him. “Contract demands” implies what Jackson will seek.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2009 12:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

4 yrs 15 mil......7 mil guaranteed.....

done and done.

12/19/08 - Thank you KLJ for coming into my life.

by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 18, 2009 12:57 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

After reading everyone’s thoughts, has everyone forgotten that Jackson has played in just 24 career games? We’re talking about giving a guy that has 1.5 years of experience, for all intents and purposes, a guy that is a backup, and a guy that will be 28 tomorrow potentially $4-5M per season????

He has 2 accrued seasons right? If he was drafted in the 4th round, he’d still be a year or two away from restricted free agency. I just can’t wrap my head around the basis for giving him such a generous deal when he hasn’t really been around long enough to truly deserve it yet. We’ve all talked about whether guys have earned a new deal (Peters being one), but fail to suggest the same for a guy like Jackson. Maybe it’s just me….

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Feb 19, 2009 1:30 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

You're right K....

and that should play into the negotiations. If I am Jackson and his agent I am asking for 1.5M base with tons of playing time and other incentives that can push me to like $4.5M.

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 19, 2009 9:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you really want to treat him like a two year player?

It is not like he wasn’t playing football. We don’t have to go overboard, but don’t low ball him.

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 19, 2009 10:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have been saying all along not to lowball....

but at the same time he is a two year player. We get all up in arms when a guy has a good year and they extend him. We like Jackson. Everybody likes him but for how long has he produced? He deserves backup or 1A money, sure. But 4M makes him the highest-paid running back on the team.

Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 19, 2009 11:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He IS a two year player though. Just like any guy who’s 2 years out of college. He was playing football prior to two years ago too. Should a team just handout a big, new contract to a backup RB 2 years out of college?

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Feb 19, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Depends if he looks like he deserves it.

In many cases last year, Jackson looked better than Lynch. Better hands, better vision, better open field ability, better speed.

Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do
when they come for you?

by Joe P. on Feb 19, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Personally, I think we should give Freddie a deal like this to start

4 years with an option for a 5th
Base Salary- $2 million a year, $2.5 for option year
Signing Bonus- $4 million
Roster Bonuses- $1/2 million a year, $1 million for option year
Incentives- various yeardage, TD, carries, and catch clauses= another $1-3 million over the contract.

I told the witch doctor that I was in love with the Buffalo Bills, and instead of telling me to say "Oh eeh oh oh ah, ting tang walla walla wing bang" in order to make me feel better he told me to buy a gun and end it.

by WABillsfan on Feb 19, 2009 7:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Dang it, forgot to put in the total numbers

So over the course of the 4 years (if we opt to not use the option year)
$8 million in salary
$4 million in signing money
$2 million in roster bonuses
And say $2 million in incentives

He would then get the following total= 16 million not bad, as it would be close to what we are thinking, but the actual hit year to year would be $2.5 to $3 million, not bad for a 1A back.

I told the witch doctor that I was in love with the Buffalo Bills, and instead of telling me to say "Oh eeh oh oh ah, ting tang walla walla wing bang" in order to make me feel better he told me to buy a gun and end it.

by WABillsfan on Feb 19, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Billsjaguars_small
Inactive Thoughts: Week 10
Buffalo_bills-1_small
CFB's returning mind dump
Small
I would love Haslett as new HC
Small
Mike Shanahan, How the Bills can land him.
Small
Best Future Coach...
Billsjaguars_small
On Mike Shanahan and Gary Kubiak
Hamstergolfhd4_small
3 Things We Need to Know: Weeks 5-10
Dib_small
Bills fans, I'm coming for you...
Bills_small
Release of Hamdan
Picture_2_small
Two possible father/son combos

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Stampede Blue
Week Eleven Early Morning Coffee
Arrowhead Pride
Week 11 Kansas City Chiefs Round Up
Battle Red Blog
Andre Johnson Claims Desire To Retire A Texan

Editor-in-Chief

Ronswanson_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Billsjaguars_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Nfl-toronto_small kaisertown