Bowen: Bills Want More From Whitner
From Matt Bowen's quick hits over at National Football Post:
Bills Want More From Whitner
People I talked to close to the Bills said the team wants to see safety Donte Whitner make more plays in the passing game — and they want him to last. The only solution I heard was moving Donte to free safety full time. The Bills are a Tampa 2 defensive team, but they play their share of Cover 1 and Cover 3 in their eight-man front, which moves Whitner into the box — and adds more hits onto his career. After seeing the result of the enormous physical contact to strong safeties such as former Bear Mike Brown and the Colts’ Bob Sanders, the move to free safety makes sense for Whitner. The Bills drafted him too high to waste him down in the box on Sundays.
This is what we all know, but the Bills need playmakers, and Donte needs to start producing. I think if he doesn't year 5 may not ever happen in Buffalo for Donte. The guy is a leader, talks the talk, but doesn't walk the walk. He said with Stroud, he could make more plays but didn't, now with more experience, more players coming in through FA, draft, year 4 for Whitner is PUT UP OR SHUT UP time for the former Buckeye.
This FanPost was written by a registered user of Buffalo Rumblings. Its views do not necessarily reflect the views of Rumblings' editorial staff, but are just as valued as our own.
0 recs |
47 comments
Comments
It's the scheme, not whitner!!!
Whitner has everything you look for in a player, but he doesnt have the stats to show it. Or should i say the picks to show it, because that’s all that people look at when determining the success of a DB in the nfl. I think it’s pretty obvious why whit doesn’t have the picks, its because like the post said he has had to spend too much time in the box helping our piss poor run defense out. Now this year they finally decide to move him to FS which i think would have been a better fit for him to begin w/… now yes he is a great tackler and flies around the field wreckless abandon, but we need to be able to showcase his skills better. We need to put whit in a position where he is able to make plays, plays that impact the game, big time plays. Such as interceptions. Turnovers have much more of an impact on a game than a tackle for no gain. Which i think we already know, but if we already knew this then why havn’t we had this guy playing center field his entire career? with his no fear attitude on the field, i would much rather see him cleaning up receivers coming across the middle and making plays in the passing game, then having him go up against OL, FB, and 230 pound running backs on a consistant basis while playing up in the box.
by Shovel51 on Feb 23, 2009 2:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, we definitely don’t look at just interceptions when determining the success of NFL safeties. Please see this article for more.
I agree Whitner needs help. But to lay all the blame on the scheme is a bad idea. Whitner needs to step up his game.
Getting him out of the box is music to my ears. His talent is wasted there.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 23, 2009 2:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
hmmmm
i think you underestimate the impact the scheme has on Whitner’s performance. You point to every safety on the roster and say none of them are make plays…. well…. maybe there’s a reason for that. I can remember times when Whitner’s actually been in coverage and done special things (ask Chad Johnson).
Just think about it, no pass rush + a scheme that is not turnover oriented…. it adds up in to me.
"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."
by ForeignArrow on Feb 24, 2009 1:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You consider hitting a guy that was diving for the ball special? Whitner barely hit Ocho Stinko on that play. And if that’s the most special play he’s made, I think that says enough.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 24, 2009 2:20 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think
you are selling him short for some non-objective reason. You don’t knock a guy out of a game by barely hitting him… besides…. Stinko alligator armed the ball because Whitner was coming…. isn’t that what you want a safety to do, intimidate receivers?
"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."
by ForeignArrow on Feb 24, 2009 9:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see how it was intimidating, he just hit hit as he was going to the ground.
And that’s once in three years, I don’t think I’m selling him short at all….
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 24, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Whitner has TERRIBLE recognition skills. He’s been absolutely brutal in that regard. He is always late getting to a receiver, can’t cover a TE and IMO, struggles to quickly diagnose plays. He’s played enough FS in his career here that he should be making plays. Playing SS isn’t an excuse because of the extensive action he’s seen at FS…
BTW, Whitner is a terrible tackler. Why do you think he’s a great tackler? Just wondering….
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 23, 2009 2:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you think he’s a terrible tackler? I don’t. I’ve seen him get run over and take bad angles, but that’s because he’s playing out of position, IMO. I’ve also seen him make some outstanding one-on-one tackles, particularly on good receivers. Seems like you’re selling him short. He’s not a complete dud, man.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 23, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He IS a terrible tackler
He puts his head down, has no form, dives at guys legs (which I know is “good” in the sense of being low) but he doesn’t rap them up, and he doesn’t use the form he should when moving with his velocity and it causes him to bounce off guys, or wiff completely.
He is a great example of guys not knowing how to tackle in the NFL, and it happens most in the DB department. THat is why it was such a relief to see Youboty tackle so well in the first part of the season. McGee is also a good tackler.
The Bills CAN win every game
by killascript on Feb 23, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
OK, but the dude racks up tons of tackles. Why does “not a good tackler” equate to “a terrible tackler”? I think Donte is more than sufficient in this department, and a long ways from terrible.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 23, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
OK
He is a “bad” tackler, who often attempts terrible tackles, and that seems to be maginfied.
The best asset Whitner has, is he gets to the ball-carrier fast once he has him in his sites.
The recognition thing I am unsure of, because he is all over the place during the play, and he is lined up as the SS, nickel corner and free safety throughout the year. The Bills lean on him alot, maybe too much, but he has been no more than decent these past few years.
I think a more structured and defined role might do him much better, like keeping him at FS, but I am not sure, what we do after that in terms of the draft and FA for the SS position and another FS prospect. Ko SImpson has not elevated himself from a sixth round pick status (I think?) and I am not sure if the other guy, Scott, should be starting more than another year if at all.
The Bills CAN win every game
by killascript on Feb 23, 2009 3:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ko was a 4th rounder.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 23, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fine…I mean terrible form.
And yes he does have poor form, for the reasons killascript mentioned.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 23, 2009 3:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
plus he’s not fast – i’ve seen numerous players run away from him. I thought speed was one of his “attributes”
alongside of a pro bowl S he would be above average – but he’s just kind of there. definately not #8 worthy – and yes I did want Ngata prior to the draft – i’m still pissed at that pick “who did they select? who? 3 years later……who???”
Oh. Uh, will you hold my wallet for me while I take the test, please? There's a thousand dollars in there... or maybe there isn't. Know what I mean?
by J2 on Feb 23, 2009 3:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There's the Ngata reference of the post
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 23, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
always need at least one when bringing up Whitner – and yes I am bitter ;)
Oh. Uh, will you hold my wallet for me while I take the test, please? There's a thousand dollars in there... or maybe there isn't. Know what I mean?
by J2 on Feb 23, 2009 3:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They wouldn't have picked Ngata regardless
It would have been Bunkley; he was thier No. 1 DT target. There needs to be a moratorium on lementing about Ngata when referencing Whitner.
by DCRumbler on Feb 23, 2009 6:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s a post about Whitner, I’m surprised it took this long….
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 23, 2009 3:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
me too!
That’s why I commented at all.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 23, 2009 4:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Whitner
is about 205 lbs… the guys he’s bringing down (he doesnt miss many tackles on receivers) are almost always 20-30 lbs bigger than him (running backs)…. if you try to “form” tackle a guy that much bigger than you, you will get trucked (you should try it sometime) or maybe just slow him down…. ask laron landry about brandon jacobs. so if you see him going low, it’s because he has to.
but all of this just highlights the fact he doesnt belong at SS or in the box…. which is exactly why Bryan Scott had such a big role toward the end of the season…. not to mention Scott was PHENOMENAL in coverage against some pretty damn good TEs.
"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."
by ForeignArrow on Feb 24, 2009 1:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You are right about Scott.
He did very well against some big time TEs. He also is better suited to the SS role. He weighs more and has more ability there.
With that being said I am not averse to keep Whitner and Scott at FS and SS, respectively.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 24, 2009 8:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I Agree with Brian....
I very much agree with Brian here. IMO Whitner is a rather “good” tackler and has pretty good recognition skills as well. Everyone keeps talking about him not making plays. I agree, he hasnt made many, BUT, how in the hell can you make plays in the secondary when your front 7 aren’t getting any pressure on the QB to force them into making mistakes? If you look at any good defense in the league they are getting to the QB. Because of this, throughout the game, their D is able to gamble and make those plays we all like. I stated in my thread about, the signing Gibril Wilson being a good idea, that Whitner would fit well at FS if we had a true play making SS. I would say my thoughts hold true. Now, if we get the right pieces in place and get pressure on the QB, then and only then, will you see Whitner or ANY of our secondary making plays on the ball.
By the way…..Does anyone agree that Troy Polomalu is one of the best safeties in football? I would think everyone would say “yes”. BUT, IMO, he is one of the “worst” tackling safeties in the league. Anyone see the Super Bowl? He was running around, diving after players feet and whiffing. But, I GUARANTEE, that you would all take him over Whitner, correct? Think about it….pressure on the QB = play making secondary.
by Hambone on Feb 23, 2009 5:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think that it’s all the scheme, it definately isn’t, but i think that if we used any safety in the same fashion we have used whit is going to decrease the amount of opportunities to get interceptions. Even so i agree he should have more than 2 career int’s.
I think at times he does take bad angles to get to ball carriers, but he does what is necessary in most cases to bring the ball carrier to the ground. When he is there to make a tackle he rarely misses (which isn’t something you can say about most DB’s). He’s a smaller guy and goes very low when tackling, as do most DB’s in this league. So im’ not sure you can look at his technique and say its poor. Yes at times i’m sure he may need to keep his head up, or wrap up a little better. But at his size the most important thing is hit’em hard, and hit’em low. I think he is a good tackler, but then these guys are in the NFL so i’ll just assume that every guy on defense should at least know how to tackle if not they shouldn’t be in this league.
by Shovel51 on Feb 23, 2009 2:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
as PozD said
7 passes defended in 3 years. last year alone suggs had 9 playing LB.
Donte takes bad angles – is slow to come over to receivers and just isn’t a playmaker. thats not the scheme thats him
Oh. Uh, will you hold my wallet for me while I take the test, please? There's a thousand dollars in there... or maybe there isn't. Know what I mean?
by J2 on Feb 23, 2009 2:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
terrell suggs
batted those balls down… why would even bring that up…. that’s like saying “marcus stroud had 9 pass break ups last season, why didnt donte have more?”
"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."
by ForeignArrow on Feb 24, 2009 1:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rumblings: Bills Fans want more from Whitner
I like that part of the excuse to move him to FS is to minimize hits he gives/takes. Unfortunately, until he learns to tackle better, it won’t matter. He’ll always be susceptible to injury with his technique. And it’s not like he was out there delivering big hits to anyone either. In fact, Whitner has never delivered a bit hit in his career as I recall. I don’t count hitting Chad Ocho Cinco when he was on the ground a big hit.
No matter what, you are correct. It’s put up or shut up time for Whitner. Now or never. Do or die. (insert other cliche here)
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 23, 2009 2:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
And the fumble-causing hit against Denver was a direct hit on the ball, not really the receiver.
by thefourwinds on Feb 24, 2009 4:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Strong words about moving him to FS.
It’s a good idea and one Brian has been spouting for a while. With that said I like Bryan Scott or could see a new SS come in and play.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 23, 2009 2:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
“A while”? I’ve been campaigning for that since August of 2007.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 23, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't that a while?
would you rahter “a long while”?
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 23, 2009 2:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
how about a “long time”
Oh. Uh, will you hold my wallet for me while I take the test, please? There's a thousand dollars in there... or maybe there isn't. Know what I mean?
by J2 on Feb 23, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cool words are fun. “Eons” would have been sufficient here. Hyperbole rules.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 23, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hasn’t he played enough FS thus far for us to know what he’s capable of there? What does he play when Bryan Scott was in the game with him??
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 23, 2009 3:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right about that
He never had an offseason workign on the position though. It was always “temporary” or “flluid”. He needs to be there and working on it full time.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 23, 2009 3:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Whitner
CANNOT PLAY SS….why do you think Scott came in and took that job from him? Cuz Whitner sucks at it. He can’t cover, doesn’t make big plays hitting guys over the middle, isn’t a great blitzer, and is overmatched in the box. The only option is to let him play FS, but even there I am not sure what his value is. We need Safety help badly, and I for one have had about all I can take from Whitner…..him and Schobel better put up or shut up this year, cuz I’m sick of hearing them talk about how good they are and start making plays to show us why they are so called “leaders” of our defense
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Feb 23, 2009 2:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Very reasonable
I hate to say it, but at #11 (and I don’t want to get chewed out for this) but is there a safety in the draft that could be the best player available at that spot…or a sleeper for a 3rd or 4th rounder. A REAL strong safety?
The Bills CAN win every game
by killascript on Feb 23, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
William Moore is the top safety prospect, and many list him as a second rounder. It’s a weak year for safety.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 23, 2009 3:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hence why I had him in my mock draft. Not too many people were very keen on that idea though.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Feb 23, 2009 5:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We have other holes to fill eric.
:-( = safety in round two
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 23, 2009 7:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He was the best player on the board and filled a need. Maybe not the biggest need the team has, but a need none the less.
I get why some were down on the pick, I probably wouldn’t like it much myself, but I thought it was kinda realistic.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Feb 24, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It makes some sense...
but bigger need and equal value players will be on the board.
Playing Eternal Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 24, 2009 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One more chance...
I say put Bryan Scott at SS, move Whitner to FS. We’ll know then.
I've been feeling Buffalo ill.
by ChipShot on Feb 23, 2009 3:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
They did that for essentially half the year last year…
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Feb 23, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We’ve seen that lineup, and it was no improvement for Whitner. FS or SS, it hasn’t mattered, he’s had little impact.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Feb 23, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yep
which is why if the value is there to draft a S of get one via FA, we have to do it…..we have to upgrade our back end……
This is a point I want to make…..is that while we don’t generate many sacks, I think the Tampa 2 is also predicated on fast, cover a lot of ground Safeties that make big hits over the middle (ie John Lynch, Bob Sanders) come to mind. Whitner is not in POSITION enough to make those hits, and seems to lack the “instincts” to be in the right spot. I think he is fast enough, has enough power and all, but bottom line is he doesn’t have the football instincts. So while, our lack of pressure doesn’t help him, I still see Bryan Scott and heck even George Wilson make more plays than Whitner because of their ability to get in position and a nose for the football…..one could argue Wilson is a better FS than Whitner, and that is not a bold statement by any stretch of imagination……Wilson just is even a worse tackler than Donte but I’d argue he has better instincts on balls deep in the secondary….We need a FS…..and maybe the value is there in round 3-5 for one
MARVelous
by MARVelous on Feb 23, 2009 3:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Im down with this move.......all of it
12/19/08 - Thank you KLJ for coming into my life.
by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 23, 2009 9:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I kind of skimmed through this thread. I didn’t really have time to read every comment, but to everyone who thinks whitner is a “terrible tackler” I have some thoughts for you.
First let me say that I don’t think Whitner is any better than an average starting safety and he might even be a little worse than that. But I don’t understand how people can be so critical of a 205-210 pound safety for averaging 6 tackles a game. I don’t mean to be critical, but I think many of the bloggers here really lack perspective. I think a lot of the Bills fans here expect our linebackers to tackle like defensive lineman and out DBs to tackle like LBs. Here is something to ponder:
Think back to how many tackles Lynch and Jackson broke last season. Try and remember how often the first person to get a hand on them actually tackled them. Marshawn and Fred are awesome at either making the first guy miss and breaking an arm tackle or just straight up running into a guy and staying on their feet, making the tackler look like a complete fool. Are all the pros that Lynch and Jackson beat for extra yardage bad tacklers? Or are those guys just average NFL players who can’t make every tackle?
by kaisertown on Feb 24, 2009 12:44 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















