Rumblings Scouting Report: South Carolina TE Jared Cook

South Carolina TE Jared Cook (Icon SMI)
As the 2009 NFL Draft approaches, the editorial staff at Buffalo Rumblings will begin profiling draft prospects that may end up being potential targets of the Bills. MattRichWarren continues his look at tight end prospects today by profiling South Carolina's Jared Cook.
One of the positions of need that has been clearly stated by the Rumblings community this year is a pass-catching tight end. As we've discussed, the best way for the Buffalo Bills to adequately address the position is through the draft. I've been assigned the task of scouting the tight ends expected to go in rounds two through four. Today we'll look at South Carolina tight end Jared Cook.
While I never watch college football, let alone the University of South Carolina, Gamecock Man from SBN's own South Carolina blog Garnet and Black Attack sure does. He has seen a lot of Cook and here's what he had to say. Bonus: Gamecock Man lives in Rochester and went to a Bills game this year. He says, "I had a great time. You guys have some great fans."
Jared Cook - Tight End, South Carolina
6'5", 240 lbs., 4.50-second 40 yard dash
Junior
Strengths: Receiving Skills
Cook is definitely a pass-catching TE. He has great hands and good route-running abilities. His size and athletic ability also give him an edge on the defender. He has the height and leaping ability to bring down jump balls in the end zone or to reel in slightly overthrown balls. Slower LBs can't keep up with his cuts on crossing routes, and he's capable of turning short gains into longer ones if he gets a step on a LB or slower DB. We got the ball to him on crossing routes quite a bit, but you can also go vertical with him. He's more or less a WR in a TEs body.
A couple of plays stand out as examples of his speed. Against both Ole Miss and Arkansas, he got past defensive backs and caught balls down the sideline around our own 30-40 yard line. Against Ole Miss, he was caught just short of the endzone, netting a 60 yard gain. Against Arkansas, the defensive backs couldn't catch him. Most NFL DBs will be faster than what Arkansas and Ole Miss put on the field, but you can see that he's fast.
Weaknesses: Blocking
Cook's blocking abilities (or maybe it's desire to block) aren't the best. We lined him up split wide in some formations, and when he lined up inside, he often got beaten off the line. You may have heard that South Carolina was one of the worst running teams and gave up lots of sacks last year. Cook was as guilty as anyone in that regard. With coaching, though, he could become a better blocker if he has the will to do so. He has the size and strength.
NFL Comparison: Calvin Johnson, Detroit
Gamecocks coach Steve Spurrier is the one who made this comparison based on Cook's size and speed. They are both 6'5" and Johnson weighs only a few pounds less than Cook at 239 pounds. While Cook's 40 time was impressive at 4.50, Johnson did run a 4.33 leading up to the draft.
Other Tidbits:
Relies on his athleticism rather than technique to get off the line of scrimmage... Tends to freelance a bit as a route-runner... Can make the spectacular catch, but is prone to lapses in concentration... Marginal effort and effectiveness as a blocker, especially in close quarters. - NFLDraftScout.com
Does Cook "Fit the Bill"?
There is a sense that he didn't live up to expectations. Cook's physical skills would make you think he could be unstoppable, and while he was certainly a productive pass catcher, he never really had the break out season statistically that we all thought he would. Steve Spurrier has criticized his drive in the past, so it makes one wonder. Part of the problem, of course, was our well-documented issues at QB, so I'm not sure that he deserves the blame.
Many people have been high on Cook but this doesn't thrill me, guys. I want guys who have something to prove. Cook, with his great Combine performance, is shooting up the draft boards both here and everywhere. I want him if he's "unstoppable" but I don't if we have to question his drive. I also don't like when scouts say he gives "marginal effort when blocking". I doubt the Bills do either.
Collected Scouting Reports for further information:
Mocking the Draft (#3 TE, third round projection)
Scott Wright (#3 TE, second-third round projection)
SI.com's Bucky Brooks (second best TE)
FFToolbox.com
Thanks a lot to Gamecock man and Garnet and Black Attack for their help on this.
0 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
Yeah, he's good
…but he’s no James Casey. Of course, given the aforementioned situation at QB in SC and the fact that Spurrier’s offenses have never produced a quality TE, it’s hard to say a whole lot on the matter.
http://riceowls.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/casey_james00.html
James Casey, a One Man Band Man
http://cbjman61.wordpress.com/
My Attempt at a Columbus Blue Jackets Blog. Blogging Help/Criticism is Very Welcome
by Hybrid1486 on Mar 14, 2009 1:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
"he could become a better blocker if he has the will to do so"
That sums up the key question with Cook. Last fall he told an interviewer that he simply didn’t like blocking, but at the combine he was assuring everyone that he can’t wait to improve his blocking technique. There’s also the troubling issue of his relatively mediocre college production (although that was also true of Terrell Owens and we know how he turned out in the NFL). In short, Cook is a gamble. Casey, Coffman and Beckum are even bigger ones. If the Bills want a more or less sure thing at TE they would be best off going with Pettigrew or Shawn Nelson.
by Macktruck on Mar 14, 2009 1:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
100% agree with you!
I do not want a “lack of effort guy” in Buffalo, I don’t care how good he is. The last thing we need is another Plaxico Burress type guy!
Pettigrew all the way baby!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Mar 14, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pettigrew’s gone in the first, unless we trade down to get him, PASS, I like him, just not at 11
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 14, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trading down is exactly what the Bills ought to do this year, if they can. If they can’t, don’t be surprised to see them take Pettigrew at #11. He could be extremely valuable at the NFL level and well worth the high pick.
by Macktruck on Mar 14, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only reason why the Bills should trade down is if Crabtree slips to us.
trading down in order to not stretch for a player is NEVER a good idea. If you trade down to get pettigrew, what garantees that Pettigrew is still there when your pick finally comes up?
they should pick the best DE at 11
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 14, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are missing the whole point
For basement teams like us with many holes to fill, trading down should always be our first option. The draft is somewhat of a crap shoot and teams that claim that they build through the draft (unlike WAS), need to get as many picks as they can to ensure that end up walking away with as many starters as possible.
I love Pettigrew and I think he will be there in the late tens because no other team than Philly & ATL really needs a TE. I seriously doubt that they would trade up to get him. But if someone were to trade back up ahead of us, that still doesnn’t make trading down a bad choice! We need the extra 2nd & 3rd rounders because we are far from being one player shy of making the superbowl.
If we trade back to 17 or 18, several of these players:
Brian Cushing, Malauga, Oher, Britton, Sintim, English, Matthews will probably be available to us and I think we’d do well with either one of them.
When you proclaim yourself to be a team that builds through the draft you need to make sure you draft more kids than other teams and that’s accomplished through trades.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Mar 15, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NFL Comparison: Calvin Johnson
Uhhh, ok
Nice job on that one Spurrier. Funny guy.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Mar 14, 2009 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Everyone's a comedian!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Mar 14, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Cook compared to Johnson,
you would have to have been an idiot not to play him at WR, Steve!
How T.O. got #81 as adapted from a "Fish called Wanda"
- After asking for #81 for free, Hardy calls T.O. a cheap, me first team cancer.
[T.O. dangles Hardy out a window.]
Hardy: All right, all right, I apologize.
T.O.: You're really sorry!
Hardy: I'm really really sorry, I apologize unreservedly.
T.O.: You take it back!
Hardy: I do, I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact, and was in no way fair comment, and was motivated purely by malice, and I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you, or your family, and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
T.O.: OK.
by Joe P. on Mar 14, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure where I stand on him
I like his hands, LOVE his speed, but hate his inability and lack of willingness to block.
I mean it would be one thing if he was like Chase Coffman, where he never needed to block in college, but shows the willingness to learn. But I don’t even see that in him.
Otherwise from his superior speed, how is this guy a better fit than Coffman?
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 14, 2009 3:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Durability. Coffman has had a lot of trouble staying on the field, in part because he has a narrow frame and can’t take hits as well as someone who has more room to put on muscle.
by Macktruck on Mar 14, 2009 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and theres my answer.
Unfortunatly all you just did is manage to discredit both TE for me at the moment… when’s Neilson’s scouting report coming up? :-p
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 14, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nelson's Report.
When the dust settles a little form the guys I have profiled, I’ll cobble together one on Nelson. I can’t find a Southern Miss. blogger or “reputable writer” that I was able to ask questions of so everything will be secondhand. Not a big deal but James Casey and Nelson’s will have to be done that way.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 14, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey as long as we get a look, i'm statisfied.
Great job on Coffman and Cook btw, Good analysis on both. Looking forward to the next ones and hoping we’ll find a good fit that isn’t named Pettigrew.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 14, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pettigrew is a good fit.
You just don’t want to take him at 11. He is a worthwhile player/prospect.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 15, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats what I ment by my Pettigrew comment. I really like him as a TE (except the fumble on the highlight real lol), I just want to take a good look at other options before I start considerng Pettigrew, because I will be disapointed if we draft him at 11 if we can find a better fit at TE (even if we have to devellop said player a little bit). I’d just much rather draft a DE than a TE at 11.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 15, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, I guess I’m more liek OBD when it comes to TE’s, I want a total package that wont be a stretch with the 11th overall pick, and neither Coffman or Cook seem like that guy for me
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 14, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's the un-willingness that gets me!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Mar 15, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coffman and Cook both are flawed players in the all around sense
I just think Coffman a little less so reagrding blocking, he at least seems willing to give it a go, but his lack of speed scares me since we need someone to eventually replace Owens’s contributions in the middle of the field, and we need a guy with some wheels at TE to do that.
Cook’s inability/unwillingness to block is scary AND the fact that man with that size, frame, hands, AND speed at the TE position wasn’t as dominant as he should be? That to me is also scary.
Hey MRW, looking forward to the Casey, Nelson, Beckum reviews!
If the Bills were a drug, I could only hope they were like speed so I could lose some weight as well.
by WABillsfan on Mar 14, 2009 5:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think he would be a great receiving TE, but I think we need someone with some ability and desire to block. I think it would be possible to use him on mostly passing plays, but then the defense would have a good idea as to when you’re passing. Not sure he is the answer, but I have heard good things about his receiving abilities.
by brianb386 on Mar 14, 2009 5:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This guy is the epitome of what I don’t want as a TE for the Bills. I love the receiving ability, but he is a WR playing TE.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Mar 14, 2009 10:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
They all are.
Welcome to the era of the college spread. SI or ESPN did a story a little while back, I think it may have been John Clayton, where he said the college spread was going to give NFL teams fits at QB, TE and OL. Can those players make the transition? It’s not any worse, IMO, than an option QB coming up to the pros but these are real questions that these kids are going to have to answer.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 15, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pettigrew is not in that group
He is the real thing
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Mar 15, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True.
I should have clarified that all the second-tier TEs are like that.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 15, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Shawn Nelson will be an above average receiver while still being a solid blocker. I think he is easily the 2nd best TE in the draft.
by kaisertown on Mar 15, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially after seeing him in the senior bowl
I would tend to agree. I really prefer Pettigrew but if our FO chooses to pick at 11 and take a DE then I’d be fine with Nelson in rd2. I would be disappointed because neither Unger/Mack/Robinson will make it to Rd3, which is why I am really hoping for a trade down scenario.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Mar 16, 2009 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
MACK Truck?
I STILL want Mack as well. I know this is a TE thread, but I just had to chime in here on Mack. He can play both C & G. BOTH positions we NEED to address FAST! Even if we started him @ G, we’d still have time to groom him (as necessary if at all) @ the Center position.
I’m still In the Pettigrew’s camp on the TE though . . . . I just don’t see us grabbing him w/o a trade b/c I doubt OBD will look @ TE @ #11, just IMO…..
Season Ticket Holder Sec: 312, Row: 15
"There's NO place like home when it's the Big Tree Inn"
by Pocono Bob on Mar 16, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















