Ranking the NFL Draft's starting linebacker prospects
As the 2009 NFL Draft approaches, we here at Buffalo Rumblings will continue interviewing bloggers and consulting outside sources in putting together detailed scouting reports on some of the Draft's most noteworthy prospects - concentrating, of course, on prospects that could pique the interest of the Buffalo Bills. This is the start of a new series in which I'll rank prospects at each position; ultimately, this project will roll itself into the "Buffalo Rumblings Big Board", which is exactly what it sounds like - the same type of big board NFL teams keep handy on draft day.
To date, most Bills fans have spent most of their energy in draft talks discussing offensive linemen, a certain Oklahoma State tight end, and the various speed rushing defensive ends available. However, the Bills have an open spot at strong-side linebacker that remains unaddressed. With that in mind, there are nine linebackers that grade out (by my book) as starting material as rookies. Those nine names, in order of preference and grouped by round grade, are below.
Round One Grades
1. Aaron Curry, Wake Forest: Solid all-around linebacker with fantastic athleticism and leadership abilities. Isn't quite the game-breaker that many are making him out to be; he's also certainly not worthy of being the top overall pick. Most definitely a Top 10 pick, however. Mocking the Draft Scouting Report
2. Clay Matthews, USC: To say this guy's stock has skyrocketed is an understatement. Outside of Curry, might be the best athlete at the linebacker position. Supremely talented blitzer. Versatility and work ethic are major selling points at the moment. His coverage skills are lacking, but in Buffalo, he'd either come off the field on passing downs or move down and rush from the DE position. Exactly the type of player that NFL coaches love to coach. Mocking the Draft Scouting Report
3. Brian Cushing, USC: Perhaps the best pure tackler of the three USC prospects. Unfortunately, he's also the biggest question mark. Durability is a huge concern. His coverage skills are severely underdeveloped, and he's not exactly the game-breaking type. He's a solid fit as a SAM, but his utility is limited to that spot. Does have a considerable amount of upside. Mocking the Draft Scouting Report
4. Rey Maualuga, USC: Easily the most NFL-ready linebacker this year. The type of player that you plug into the lineup and let him go from Day One. Like his two USC teammates, he's got experience in a zone-based scheme. Two things are working against him in terms of Buffalo, however - less than stellar straight-line speed and, far more importantly, the fact that the team seems content keeping Paul Posluszny inside. Mocking the Draft Scouting Report
Five more names for you after the jump.
Second Round Grades
5. Gerald McRath, Southern Mississippi: A quick, fast, nimble athlete, though he doesn't play as fast as his workout numbers might indicate. Played middle linebacker in college - and therefore knows how to compete in the box - but is probably a more natural fit outside in a 4-3 alignment. Size (224 pounds) is a concern, but has the frame to get bigger. Instincts are great; polished in coverage. Has the potential to be dominant in a Tampa 2 scheme. Mocking the Draft Scouting Report
6. James Laurinaitis, Ohio State: Like Maualuga, he's got Posluszny's entrenchment on the inside working against him. He's not a game-changer, and he's more limited athletically than some of his peers he's competing at the top with. Still, the kid has through-the-roof intangibles and a nose for the ball. He's a very solid run defender. He'll be more highly valued by other teams, as he should be. Mocking the Draft Scouting Report
7. Marcus Freeman, Ohio State: Is sliding back up draft boards after solid performances at both the Scouting Combine and his Pro Day. An underrated athlete, but doesn't play as big as his 240-pound frame would indicate. Not a physical tackler. Might not hold up well against the run at the NFL level, but has good potential. Polished in coverage, though he lacks good ball skills. Short by NFL standards. Draft Countdown Scouting Report
Third Round Grades
8. Tyrone McKenzie, South Florida: Good athlete. Quick with sideline-to-sideline range. He's a very smart player, which helps him overcome stiff hips in coverage routinely. By no means is he polished in this department, however. Like Freeman, he's not physical and isn't necessarily a top-notch run defender. Unlike Freeman, he's got ideal size (6'2", 243). Solid upside, but a risky bet as a rookie starter. Draft Countdown Scouting Report
9. Clint Sintim, Virginia: If the Bills ran a 3-4, Sintim would grade out as a first-round prospect. He's a very solid and potentially underrated rush linebacker in that particular scheme. He's not, however, a good fit for the Bills schematically. A bit limited athletically, and not as explosive as the other top 3-4 rush linebacker, Matthews. Terrible in coverage. He'd be a situational player only in a Bills uniform. Mocking the Draft Scouting Report
***
This is just my opinion, folks. These are the nine rookie linebackers I think the Bills could get away with plugging into the starting lineup next season. If you think I've made a grievous error in these rankings, let me know. If you think I've got some sort of hidden agenda, I'd love to hear about it. If you're itching to re-shuffle my rankings, let it rip. Consider this an open forum on 2009 NFL Draft linebacking prospects. Go.
0 recs |
44 comments
|
Comments
Clay Matthews
Galliford makes a good point about Matthews. Although we might need to move up in the first round to get him in the last 10 picks or so, I think he would be a nice fit. He’s like a DE and a LB from what Galliford said in his scouting report. The Bills lack versatility on defense, without even one player who can do a number of things well, this guy would be a nice addition. That’s a player I think Perry Fewell would love to have, although he doesn’t blitz as much as I think he should. If the BIlls coaching staff likes this guy then I’m all for him, I wonder what they think of him though? He kind of smells like Bobby Carpenter to me, AJ Hawks running mate at OSU who has done nothing since being drafted in the first round a few years ago.
by louiethegent on Mar 18, 2009 8:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't like anyone who suddenly moves up the boards.. it never seems to pan out
ok so clay mathews is poor in coverage, but we can just take him out on passing downs? it’s not like inserting a rush de on passing downs which is usually 3rd down… there is a lot more too just simply taking a LB out on passing downs because in the NFL teams can pass on any down at anytime, heck they can even audible into a pass and take advantage of his poor coverage skills.. i don’t want any LB at 11 who isn’t a complete player…I’ll take a situation DE but not a situational LB that just doesnt make sense
by Shovel51 on Mar 18, 2009 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t like anyone who suddenly moves up the boards.. it never seems to pan out
Well, it worked out for the Cowboys and DeMarcus Ware… and there are countless others. I’m a little wary of him as well… I’m not particularly in love with much of this year’s linebacking corps (or, really, the entire draft class).
I don’t understand your prejudice against “situational” linebackers. EVERY linebacker is situational. The three-down linebacker is a dying species. You can only have so many linebackers on the field when you’re in nickel and dime sets, after all. Considering the fact that we’ve got enough safeties to play the short areas in those sets, where’s the harm in drafting an outside linebacker who can help out in the pass rush from time to time?
I’m not advocating drafting any of these guys. I just try to mesh grade, utility and upside into the ranking, and this is how it turned out (for the starting-caliber linebackers). I’m not particularly enthused about any of them, even Curry.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 18, 2009 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
can't argue that...
first of all ijust want to say i greatly appreciate the posts and analysis you put up on players, but i just feel that his weakness in coverage will be exposed and to what degree idk and how bad is actually in coverage idk.. i just think that it’s tougher to hide LB who is poor in coverage than hide a DE who is poor in run defense (assuming its a situation pass rusher)… that’s all..
I kind of think that LB is a deep position this year, not because they are all oustanding, but because there doesnt seem to be a whole awful lot of drop off, and we could find a guy in round 2-4 that could come in and compete for the position, i just oppose the idea of going LB in round 1, not that, that’s what you want to do, but i just feel that’s it’s not the best route to go. I will be disappointed if the bills decide to go any other route than DE at 11, unless orakpo, brown, and maybin are off the board.
by Shovel51 on Mar 18, 2009 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curry is the real deal
As much as I like Matthews, I think Curry is going to be great.
Bills fan half way around the world
by moncheri on Mar 18, 2009 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He looks like a Pro Wrester. Only good things can come from that.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 18, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is anyone ever worth the overall number 1 pick?
by syrbillsfan on Mar 18, 2009 8:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Peyton Manning does OK. But I get your point.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 18, 2009 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crazy isn't it
I think it ends up just being a case of being anything less than “The Most Awesome Player Ever” means your a bust at that spot.
I was going to say something about Peyton, he really probably was worth it, right. Laser rocket arm and all.
As an aside, did you expect all that Cutler love to surface over the weekend? I think he might be more gifted, but Trent will be just fine with the newly stocked armory :)
by syrbillsfan on Mar 18, 2009 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eli has done pretty well too
Mario Williams too, Jake Long did pretty well last year, Orlando pace was a rock for years. Sure there have been a few flops (David Carr) but in the most part, the first over all pick is a pretty solid pick to have, you know, being the first pick and all.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 18, 2009 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bruce Smith was worth it.
everything goes better with a BIG MACK
by keuka121 on Mar 18, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is there a possibility that Mathews slips to the second?
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 18, 2009 8:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Right now? Absolutely not. Green Bay will consider him with the ninth overall pick. Houston loves him at 15, too.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 18, 2009 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mathews
Clay Mathews shot up the charts because he had a strong second-half of the year. He didn’t start as a junior and didn’t become a starter until 3 games into the season. Cushing is a much safer pick at outside linebacker. He was not even considered to be an NFL-ready linebacker before the season. Mauluaga had a better junior season than senior year and would have been a top-10 pick if he came out early last year. I still wish the Bills would move Poz to the outside, where he played at Penn State and get a bigger linebacker in the middle like Mauluaga for the inside. The Patriots are targeting Mauluaga and drooling at the prospect of him being there. After all, as usual they drafted Mayo last year who was Defensive Rookie of the year. Typical Bills and Typical Pats……..
by BuffaloWhiner on Mar 18, 2009 9:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i agree that matthews is WAY overhyped
He was a one time walk-on player. He didn’t start until he was a SENIOR. He is the 3rd best linebacker on HIS TEAM. He might be a physical freak, but so was Vernon Gholston. Except Gholston actually put up good stats in college.
If we pick a linebacker early, I hope it’s either Curry (not likely to fall to us), or Maualuga.
by bruuuuce_02 on Mar 18, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
- Matthews didn’t start until he was a senior because in case you haven’t noticed, USC is kind of a NFL linebacker machine. They’ve also had some solid linebackers that haven’t gone pro. Lofa Tatupu, Matt Grootegoed, Dallas Sartz, Keith Rivers, Maualuga/Cushing, and I’m certain there’s another one or two I’m missing. He earned his keep, and shouldn’t be docked too many points because he had some experienced talent in front of him.
- Why does everyone keep bringing up Vernon Gholston as the golden rule of busts? He’s played one NFL season. Yes, it was disappointing, but he was learning an entirely new position, and he had to play behind Calvin Pace and Bryan Thomas as it was. He’s not a bust. I wish people would stop calling him a bust. He still very well could end up being a bust, but people also rarely take into account that he was playing out of position last year.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 18, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
re: gholston
I actually don’t think he will end up being a bust. But I also don’t think the Bills need a project player in the 1st round. We need impact. Someone that has the potential to start at least midway into the season. I think you have that in guys like Raji, Orakpo, Maualuga, Cushing, Curry, Oher, and Mack. I would rather see one of those guys than a project guy.
by bruuuuce_02 on Mar 18, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Any of the first or second round graded guys he has would start day 1 probably.
We wouldn’t be teaching any of them a new position.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 18, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is Matthews a project? He sure seems capable of playing right away to me, especially as a blitz/pass rusher….
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Mar 18, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
With the exception of Curry
this is not a good draft for a LB to be taken #11. I think the Bills would be better off this year by signing June and Crowell.
by gjv on Mar 18, 2009 9:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Both of them?
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 18, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well you did say that LB is a situational position now
so one lb for the run and one for the pass. I think thats what he was aluding to.
Personally i’d still draft an LB if we don’t sign one, and I don’t like June either. But we should use our 11th pic on a DE IMO
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 18, 2009 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I try not to get too wrapped up in the “we need this position” stuff. Playmakers help you overcome deficiencies. I’d rather bring in a good football player than simply plug a hole.
Obviously, I think DE gets preference, as do TE, OL and LB, but we don’t have to pigeon-hole ourselves by round. Take the best player for your team.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 18, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree
I think Brown would be the best fit for us in the first round, largely due to K’s great report on him, but if he’s gone, then I’d like to trade down for either Mack or Pettigrew, or maybe draft Cushing (or hopefully Mathews) and Draft English or Sidbury in the second
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 18, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh, oh. This is the kind of thinking that can lead to drafting another CB…
by thefourwinds on Mar 18, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not at 11.
Maybe in the later rounds but not at 11.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 18, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You Forget
Malcolm Jenkins is a DB from Ohio St…the Bills won’t be able to pass it up… : )
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 18, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Riiight.
I get the sarcasm…. but serisouly they won’t take him. :-)
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 18, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm of the opinion
that we need a playmaking DE more than any other position.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 18, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, I had to leave. If Crowell is healthy I would sign both. Both of these LB’s are better than Ellison. Unless I felt a need to keep Ellison for special teams , I would let him go. In my opinion I just improved the starting SSLB position and the LB bench.
by gjv on Mar 18, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good list
Although I would switch Mauluga and Cushing. I would also move Laurantitis up. He’s like Poz, he doesn’t have a lot of flash, but his intangibles are an A+.
As for Currey, he’s the only guy in this draft that I really love. He’s a complete, all-around LB. He’s number 1 on my board by far. I’m warming up to Matthews, but still not blown away.
John I.
by jri111 on Mar 18, 2009 10:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
I would really like Cushing if he wasn’t so frail.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Mar 18, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Matthews is anything like his dad
he will play for a long, long time. Dad played for 17 years, I believe. Not outstanding, but left everything on the field when he played.
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Mar 18, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cushing is a bit brittle and some say he is about maxed out. Not too much upside left. But a great open field tackler. Mathews probably has more upside.
everything goes better with a BIG MACK
by keuka121 on Mar 18, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know it carries over from yesterday’s Brown profile (basically, I know I shouldn’t judge a player based on the school) but tOSU linebackers make me nervous. I think Laurantitis is better than their previous LB’s to come out, but I’m still wary of him. Regardless, it’s probably a moot point, because there’s no way you take him at 11, and I’m not positive he makes it to us in the second round (and we’re not in terrible need of a MLB).
I’m coming around on Matthews, but I’m not sure if I’d have the same opinion if he had a different name.
John Madden told me 90% of the game was half-mental...
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Mar 18, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
After Curry, I agree that Cushing seems to fit here the best.
If the Front Office isn’t enamored with any DE prospect they could do a lot worse than picking Cushing at 11. Even then he could move down and replace Kelsay (or whoever at DE) on passing downs and just rush the QB with reckless abandon. Have Youboty step on the field and Kelsay step off. Some people seem to be making the situational LB thing out to be a big deal but one guy steps off the firled and one guy steps on. What’s the big deal? He’s not a liability in that if it’s a pass he just stands there not knowing what to do.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 18, 2009 2:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Bills like to reach for players, so that rules out Cushing :-)
Why do you have to 'put your two cents in'... but it's only a 'penny for your thoughts'? Where's that extra penny going to?
by Joe P. on Mar 18, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boooo
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 18, 2009 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, wouldn’t that favor Cushing? He seems to be behind Matthews right now, meaning he’s a borderline top 20 pick. Or something.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Mar 19, 2009 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brian, could we see OBD decide to go with a later pick OLB that can blitz with a hand down
If Matthews and Curry are both gone at #11, like a Cody Brown from UConn who did that all year for them and piled up a good number of sacks.
If the Bills were a drug, I could only hope they were like speed so I could lose some weight as well.
by WABillsfan on Mar 18, 2009 6:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’ve heard whispers that they like Brown. But I highly doubt they’re looking at him as a linebacker.
There’s a chance that they’ll wait on LB, yes. But we’ve heard, and I’ve heard, that they’re likely going defense with their top pick.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 18, 2009 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good! No Pettigrew at 11!
Don’t get me wrong, I like him, just not at eleven. I’d much rather we draft Everette Brown or Aaron Maybin.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 18, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



























