Killing the Golden Goose
This will be a long post and has to do with recent rule changes that in my opinion are beginning to ruin the game of football.
Theres an Aesop's fable that goes:
"A man and his wife owned a very special goose. Every day the would lay a golden egg, which made the couple very rich.
"Just think," said the man's wife, "If we could have all the golden eggs that are inside the goose, we could be richer much faster."
"You're right," said her husband, "We wouldn't have to wait for the goose to lay her egg every day."
So, the couple killed the goose and cut her open, only to find that she was just like every other goose. She had no golden eggs inside of her at all, and they had no more golden eggs."
What does that have to do with anything? read on.
On March the 24th the AP released:
"NFL owners have passed four player safety rules for next season. One of them is the elimination of blindside helmet-to-helmet blocks.
The changes came Tuesday at the NFL meetings in California.
The new rules state that the initial force of a blindside block can't be delivered by a helmet, forearm or shoulder to an opponent's head or neck. An illegal blindside block will bring a 15-yard penalty.
Initial contact to the head of a defenseless receiver also will draw a 15-yard penalty.
On kickoffs, no blocking wedge of more than two players will be allowed. Also, the kicking team can't have more than five players bunched together pursuing an onside kick."
then we got the "Tom Brady rule"
"In part because of the season-ending left knee injury that Brady suffered in the Patriots' 2008 season opener against the Chiefs, the league's Competition Committee adopted a clarification of the current rule on hits to a quarterback in the knee area or below. The clarification specifically prohibits a defender on the ground who hasn't been blocked or fouled directly into the quarterback from lunging or diving at the quarterback's lower legs.
Brady tore his left ACL and left MCL in the first quarter of the Patriots' 17-10 win over the Chiefs Sept. 7. As Brady stepped into a 28-yard completion to Randy Moss, Chiefs safety Bernard Pollard made a desperation dive into Brady's left knee after he had been blocked to the ground just short of Brady by running back Sammy Morris.
Pollard was not flagged or fined for the hit. Under the revised rule, a play like his would be penalized, according to Titans coach Jeff Fisher and Falcons president Rich McKay, co-chairmen of the committee.
"I think all the quarterbacks in this league are critical to what the game is about," said Patriots owner Robert Kraft. "It's like if Peyton Manning were gone for a season, I think the whole NFL suffers, the same way the NFL suffered with Tommy out. So whatever we can do to protect quarterbacks and to minimize the opportunity of them being taken out with a year-ending injury I would support.
"It's not good for the league. What makes it special is special players. It's like going to see a great movie and the star isn't in the movie. It's the same principle."
Although the Brady addendum was announced here at the owners' meetings yesterday, McKay said the point of emphasis on low hits on quarterbacks was actually passed a few weeks ago when the committee met in Naples, Fla.
The fifth provision of Rule 12, Section 2, Article 12 (roughing the passer) says that: "A rushing defender is prohibited from forcibly hitting in the knee area or below a passer who has one or both feet on the ground, even if the initial contact is above the knee. It is not a foul if the defender is blocked (or fouled) into the passer and has no opportunity to avoid him."
Fisher said the feeling was that a play like the one Pollard made is one that can be avoided.
"It's a player that's down and then he does that second act where he's getting up and intentionally rolling into the quarterback, or where he's getting up and he lunges at his legs," Fisher said. "We've got a lot of shots where guys have gone down, crawled, and swiped. We don't feel like that's potentially as injurious to the quarterback than the hit where the shoulder comes down to the knee or the planted leg.""
An interesting player to bring up once again is Troy Polamalu.
Polamalu you could say saw this coming. He questioned even last year the motives of those who are running the league,
According to Polamalu watering down the game and removing physicality makes it so that, "It loses so much of its essence, and it really becomes like a pansy game,"
"I think regarding the evolution of football, it's becoming more and more flag football, two-hand touch. We've really lost the essence of what real American football is about. I think it's probably all about money. They're not really concerned about safety."
He pointed out that on one hand the player delivering hard hits was fined, but yet the league profited off "NFL's hardest hits" videos and other such merchandise.
He said even back then that it was hard to know when it was okay to hit the QB. He said that even before the Tom Brady rule became official. Polamalu even went so far as to say that players like Dick Dutkus and Ronnie Lott couldn't survive in this game because they were TOO physical.
And Polamalu is 100% correct.
This league has become an emasculated bureaucracy.
Some rules have be necessary, Deacon Jones head slap was a rule that just had to be banned period. But already these new rule changes are going to hurt the Bills badly on special teams. These players instead of being focused on playing to their best ability, have to be weighed down with all of these idiotic rules. They have traded the best part of the game: the toughness and physicality, to protect players from doing the job that they are supposed to do. All of these players have to retrain in a different way now, Special teams have to be coached in a different way now, S and DB now apparently have to just allow the WRs to catch balls rather than risk accidentally hitting them in the head give up a 15 yard penalty, and if they get away with the "penalty" you can bet that they will be fined later. If they speak out they are fined. Maybe some new offensive strategies will involve an oversized Mark Kelso helmet and players ducking their heads into LBs and DBs trying to draw penalties. Maybe coaches will start telling their players how to "gingerly tackle other players" Who knows how coaches react to these new rules.
The point is that this is our NFL now. This was formally the goose that laid the golden egg but its now on the ground struggling for breath, it's owner squeezing and ripping out as many golden eggs as it can from it. And we the fans have been sitting by and watching it happen and we can't do anything about it.
All the time we hear the league NEEDS Tom Brady.
Bull.
The league NEEDS to grow a pair.
UPDATE:
When owners voted last week to eliminate a wedge on kickoff returns that includes more than two players, citing safety concerns, some called it a minor alteration. But it's far from that to special teams coaches, who now are forced to rewrite significant portions of their playbooks because of how prominent the wedge had become.
The wedge is a human wall, often including 300-pound linemen who line up closest to the returner and whose job it is to take on coverage players who have built up great velocity from surging down the field. They usually absorb the most violent hits on each return, and this will limit those collisions.
Teams like the Redskins and Giants figure to be most affected, as they regularly run powerful four-man wedges. A couple of teams occasionally run a five-man wedge.
"Most everybody runs a three or a four, and has for years," said Bills special teams coach Bobby April, whose units annually rank near the top of the NFL. "I told my wife, with these rules I just added a lot more work hours because we run that and we've run that for a long time and been successful with it. It's going to take a lot of work and a lot of ingenuity to come up with a different offense, because basically a kickoff return is an offensive play.
So that should address my point that it might hurt the bills in the long run
Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.
24 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The NFL is just trying to make the game safer
and I personally think they are doing a good job. You may like it, you may choose to dislike it. Bottom line is the rules are there. Plus, this will hopefully keep players from being whacked when they are in a precarious and unprotected situation. Brady’s injury had nothing to do with these rules. The Bills special teams will not be effected by these rules because of the schemes that they run and the players that they have running these schemes. Not too mention they have the best special teams coach in the league.
The time to deliver is now and if you fail to do so you will no doubt witness the consequences first hand.
they do have the best special teams coach, but if you don’t think he will have to adjust to this, think again. There will be a time when we have to go for an onside kick and it will be extremely difficult to recover. Why even add that rule, were too many onside kicks performed successfully or something? It’s just stupid rules about nothing. I can see the argument for the unprotected hits, but it’s the QB who often puts WR in position to take those hits, better decision making from QB= less hits= less injuries.
And how can you say the Brady incident had nothing to do with these rules, when it clearly says in the article that it does.
THe onside kick thing.
When I was on onside kicks it was my job to run down and demolish the kid we were kicking at before the ball got there or as the ball got there. My players knew who it was and would go to the same spot to get the ball after I clobbered that kid.
When I was receiving the onside kick, my job was to go ten yards in front of our “hands guy” and take on that wall of recovery guys so they couldn’t get to the ball before my guy did.
That being said, my job was to blow people up and they don’t want that kind of wedge busting (see Kevin Everett’s hit where he was busting the wedge and hurt his neck). They don’t want running full steam straight into each other hits where you are just trying to explode another guy.
Right or wrong, that’s the reason.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 24, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I can understand certain changes but not...
helmet to helmet on a blindside block, i mean you can’t go low, you can’t go high, You basically have to fit your entire body into a strike zone, its rediculous the game is too fast, the guys are too big, and the game is played primarily on instincts. you hit whatever part of the man you can. so then they start hitting him in the chest or stomach and rupture his spleen, break ribs, who knows, it’s a violent game, there is always going to be injuries that’s just part of it.
the POOR TOM BRADY RULE IS BS TOO, comeon if the guy falls on the ground at the feet of the qb he is expected to get all the way up (costing valuable time) and then tackle him, this is a game of milli-seconds, and centimeters, that could cause a play to go from a sack to touchdown. these guys are taught from grade school to do whatever necessary to get to that qb, dig claw scratch by any means necessary that is what they now get paid millions to do…sack the qb.. maybe ol’ tommy boy should have been a little more aware of the guy laying 3 feet in front of him, to me if it’s not a cheap shot it’s not a problem, and it should be up to that qb to protect himself just as all the other players in this league are expected to do that same.
Fisher said...
they don’t have to get back up… they can wrap up the legs or swipe the leg out.
Essentially any hit between shoulder and knee is legit.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 25, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah i can't wait to see the refs deciding whether to throw the flag or not on those plays
i understand the rule.. the player can not lunge, or thrust themselves at the qb’s lower extremeties (knee or lower), but if a 330 pound man is on his stomach i have a hard time believing he is going to wrap the qb up easilly enough to where it looks like he’s not lunging or thrusting.. and if you are able to swipe a 6’4" 230 lb qb to the ground with a hand and take his legs out, he shouldn’t even be in the NFL.. it sounds to me more like a statement to make the rule change sound not quite as bad.. i understand the rule, but i think refs already throw flags on hits to the qb when their shouldnt’ be one, and it’s just going to get worse now.. i mean i always though this was a rule, but apparently it wasn’t worded strict enough. so now they are really going to be pushing the issue this year and i’[m not looking forward to it..
What a bunch of BS. The Brady rule that is.
What exactly is a defender supposed to do there? Pollard was blocked to the ground and the only way he could get to Brady was to try and tackle him low, from the ground. The NFL is telling me that players can no longer do this? It’s a game of milliseconds, there’s no time for him to get back up. And why stop at protecting the QB’s only? Why aren’t players like Brandon Jacobs protected? Smaller CB’s will ALWAYS go after his knees, but he’ll remain susceptible to these clean hits. And I have to wonder why this rule is all of a sudden put into place….oh I know, because Brady must be protected at all costs! Why no rule after Losman took a cheap shot to the knee from Wilfork?
I don’t mind cutting out the blocks to the head part, that is a good idea.
Kudos to Polamalu. He’s right. Other than hits to the head, the league is wrongfully taking away the physicality the NFL was nurtured on. I am all for protecting players, but this is going to far, IMO. Defenders are going to be consciously trying to avoid certain hits, and in turn leaving themselves susceptible to injury.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
Jeff Fisher said this about the Brady Pollard thingy....
“It’s a player that’s down and then he does that second act where he’s getting up and intentionally rolling into the quarterback, or where he’s getting up and he lunges at his legs,” Fisher said. “We’ve got a lot of shots where guys have gone down, crawled, and swiped. We don’t feel like that’s potentially as injurious to the quarterback than the hit where the shoulder comes down to the knee or the planted leg.”"
Apparently he should have tried to grab Brady’s leg and pull him down instead of lunge… eww. I feel dirty for even saying a word agaisnt you on this. Not that I’m against you.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 24, 2009 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions
the blocks to the head are a reaction probably when Hines Ward broke Keith Rivers jaw. Yes it cost the Bengals alot of money, but it was a clean hit and a good play. If Rivers would have payed more attention it wouldn’t have happened. It’s the same principle as running into a screen in basketball. We should ban screens because someone could run into them and be injured!
When you set a screen, you stand still
When you throw a block you are forcing your momentum (mass times velocity) at someone greatly increasing the force. The pick in basketball is simply mass x velocity of the screened guy where as a blocker is double that force.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 24, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions
fair enough but your forgetting that NFL players have big pads and a helmet. But the principle is the same it’s the players not paying attention to picks and players like Hines Ward that leads to injuries. Ward isn’t doing anything wrong he just is good at his job.
Interestingly enough the Steelers were the only team to stand against these rule changes, and they are last year’s champions and were known for dominating defense hard hits, and injecting fear into their opponents. They didn’t care about coddling players they cared about winning a championship and guess what they went and they won one. And meanwhile our team WON’T EVEN PRACTICE OUTDOORS! This is a game for men and too bad the only team that realizes that is out voted 31-1.
I’m not trying to come off as an internet tough guy/macho man or whatever, but C’mon this is football. To me there is just something wrong with screwing with this stuff. Players now are supposed to be even tougher than they used to be not the other way around. Football is a wonderful game because of the skill and even the finesse but also it is wonderful in the 3 yards and a cloud of dust sense, violent goalline stands in the snow, etc. And I’m not saying that won’t still happen and that players are now wusses but I feel this is a step in the wrong direction.
Running into a screen playing basketball, and launching yourself at someone's head in football...
your compairing apples and oranges. There is a huge difference between the two and its not likely your going to be severly hurt running into a screen (I have done that). On the other hand, anytime a player, at full running speed takes aim that high up (head shot), he is wanting to do harm. You can make a hard hit on someone by not aiming for the head with the helmet, shoulder pad or forearm, that will only cause broken jaw, concusion or broken neck. If anything, the penalty should be 30 yards, and the player drop kicked out of the game (and i have had cheap shot like this also, no fun waking up sick on your stomach and seeing 8 of everything).
Are we drafting Dino's now?
"6'6" monster receiver with a Terradactyl wingspan "....... Keysh67
by Billsfanstuckinthesouth on Mar 25, 2009 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t know if this is an “up in arms” kinda thing. It’s annoying to be sure. I’m not going to get all bent out of shape over it. It is what it is.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
I love how the same exact type of hit by Vince Wilfork on JP gets barely a rumbling, but a hit on Brady inspires a rule change. Bias, anyone?
by Posluszny Pollocks on Mar 24, 2009 5:06 PM EDT reply actions
….Even if I do think it isn’t a bad change, its a dangerous play every time. I just think we will see D-Lineman put on the ground, since it effectively takes them out of the play completely now.
by Posluszny Pollocks on Mar 24, 2009 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Who was the number 1 most likely NFL bust?
by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on Mar 24, 2009 6:20 PM EDT reply actions
huh?
A person who performs good Karma (deeds) is always held in high esteem
12/19/08 - Thank you KLJ for coming into my life.
by norcaliangelsfan on Mar 24, 2009 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Some source said that Maybin was the 2nd most likely NFL bust. I would like to know who they thought was first.
by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on Mar 24, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know why I posted here.
For some reason I thought I was responding to the “10 Reasons Not to Draft Maybin” thread. I think it was Sporting News.
by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on Mar 24, 2009 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions

by 



















