Searching for tendencies in Dick Jauron drafting
Dick Jauron has been a head coach at the NFL level for eight full seasons. He spent five years coaching the Chicago Bears from 1999-2003; and, obviously, he's spent the past three seasons with the Buffalo Bills. In eight full seasons, any coach will develop draft-day tendencies, and Jauron is no different. As an example, fans often cite his soft spot for defensive backs as one tendency most likely to show up on draft day.
It's important to note that as the head coach, Jauron has not been the sole decision-maker during his stints with Chicago and Buffalo. The head coach generally signs off on draft picks, however, so charting tendencies from eight draft classes is hardly irrelevant. Examining Jauron's eight drafts as a head coach show a solid balance in positional choice, as well as many hits and misses. In all, Jauron is your typical NFL drafter - he's won some and lost some - but there are tendencies to keep in mind as the NFL Draft approaches.
Positional Splits
Jauron has headed up eight draft classes, which include 75 players in total. In terms of drafting by position, Jauron's teams have shown a steady balance between drafting offensive skill position players (29.3%, 22 players), offensive and defensive linemen (32%, 24 players), and players for his defensive back seven (37.3%, 28 players). In terms of his three Bills drafts by themselves, those numbers change slightly - skill players (23%, 6 players), linemen (38.5%, 10 players), and back seven (38.5%, 10 players).
Fans are accurate in their assessment of Jauron's preference for defensive backs, as he has drafted more corners and safeties (16) than any other positional group through his eight drafts. Other frequently-drafted areas include linebacker and wide receiver (12), offensive line (11) and defensive line (9).
Like any other coach, Jauron has hit and missed on many of the prospects (16 in total) he's drafted in the first two rounds. You won't hear many complaints about Jauron draft picks like Brian Urlacher, Mike Brown, Marc Colombo or Marshawn Lynch, at least in terms of their on-field exploits. He's missed badly on names like Cade McNown, David Terrell, Michael Haynes and Rex Grossman, however. This is, in reality, par for the course when it comes to solving the NFL Draft. He's also brought in many a mid-to-late round gem, including Lance Briggs, Michael Green, and Trent Edwards, among others.
Developing trends
Because of the positional balance that Jauron has orchestrated in his drafts, it's difficult to pull out many sure-fire trends from his history. We've already mentioned his penchant for taking defensive backs; beyond that, there are only two trends that are worth noting as they pertain to predicting the Bills' direction with the 2009 Draft:
Defense heavy: Of the 75 total draft picks Jauron has signed off on, 48 of those players (a whopping 64% of the total) have been defenders. Jauron is very much a defense-oriented drafter. Of the eight first-round draft picks Jauron has been involved with, however, only half (Urlacher, Haynes, Donte Whitner and Leodis McKelvin) have been defenders, so he's balanced in that aspect. 14 of his 26 picks (53.8%) with the Bills have been defenders, as well. Given his defensive background, this can hardly be considered surprising.
Top-heavy positionally: In eight drafts, Jauron has gone a little "position-crazy" in four of them. In 1999, with 13 picks in tow, the Bears selected three wide receivers and three linebackers (as well as two defensive backs). In 2000, the Bears selected three more defensive backs, as well as two more receivers and linebackers. I'm sure you all recall the 2006 and 2008 drafts, in which the Bills took three defensive backs in both cases. Jauron drafts have a tendency to run hot on a certain position; in most cases, it's been in the defensive backfield, where Jauron believes depth is more critical than at any other position.
Focusing on 2009
With these trends in mind, where might Buffalo decide to look in 2009? The data isn't particularly earth-shattering or relevant to making predictions, but with a little inside knowledge, one can begin to formulate (or, in our case, re-iterate with factual confirmation) a rough strategy.
We're already aware that the Bills are likely to look for the biggest impact defender they can find in the first round, thanks to some first-hand information passed our way a while back (though it probably wasn't difficult for many fans to infer that on their own). That info is backed up by Jauron's history of focusing on adding defenders through the draft, and is further strengthened by Buffalo's insatiable thirst for an impact player on defense. Given that Jauron has drafted just four tight ends in eight years, we can all but rule out Brandon Pettigrew, unless the scouting department views him as a rare enough talent that he can't be passed up. An offensive lineman also seems unlikely at this point, unless Jason Peters is traded, though Jauron has shown a willingness to take them early (Colombo).
Drafting the best available defender in the first round this year is a virtual lock for the Bills. Considering Jauron's draft history, the team's needs and the talent available this year, we feel (perhaps overly) confident that our Buffalo Rumblings Pre-Draft Big Board - which lists our top eight prospects for the Bills - will be, in many respects, a relatively accurate portrayal of the Bills' draft board come April 25.
64 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great idea and look at Jauron's drafts
It sure seems like we’ll add a LB or DE, probably LB doesn’t it?
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 12:10 PM EDT reply actions
Jauron drafts have a tendency to run hot on a certain position; in most cases, it’s been in the defensive backfield, where Jauron believes depth is more critical than at any other position.
That is one of the main reasons why his teams have not been that successful. successful teams are born in the trenches and the decision makers at OBD have neglected those positions for too long. I would hope they draft heavy on trench players as that is a key to this team making the next step.
decision makers at OBD have neglected those positions for too long
Not this regime. 10 linemen drafted in 3 years; that’s over three per season. They clearly need more help, but “neglected” isn’t the right word there.
Now, if you’re talking about high draft picks or previous regimes, then yeah, you probably have an argument.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
that's exactly what I'm talking about
the picks seem like afterthoughts or in some cases complete reaches which makes those positions a neglected one. It almost seems like since Mike Williams and to a lesser extent John McCargo, OBD has been hesitant to take the player that would provide the best return on the investment.
by gatornation on Mar 26, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Neglected is exactly the right word
I’m going to disagree with you here Brian.
Let’s look a little closer at those 10 draftees.
2006:
1st: DT McCargo
5th: DT Williams
5th: OL Butler
7th: OL Pennington
7th: OL Merz!
2007:
7th: TE Schouman
7th: DE Ah You
2008:
3rd: DE Ellis
4th: TE Fine
7th: OL Bell
I’m assuming TE was included in your 10 for the trenches.
So in 3 seasons, they’ve spent a total of THREE draft picks in the first 4 rounds on the trenches. That’s neglecting it if you ask me. Adding late round picks isn’t addressing positions in the trenches, it’s simply filling out your roster.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
Yes, TE is included there, because let’s face it – the Bills don’t draft the type of tight end that can be considered a “skill position” player.
That’s neglecting it if you ask me.
And if you ask me, it isn’t. I’m of the belief that you can add linemen later in the draft and expect them to develop. That doesn’t mean I’m averse to taking them earlier than the seventh round (five of them were seventh-rounders), though. You know I want to see more linemen added in earlier rounds. But linemen are easier to develop than other positions, so I’m not going to complain that they’ve added ten such players, even though they’ve been late-round picks.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions
i'm more inclined
to develop OL with late round selections. However I believe DL need to be higher draft picks. From the Bill’s perspective they have done a fair job at developing OL (Peters, Butler, now hopefully D. Bell) but have yet to develop DL in the same manner (Copeland Bryan). The smartest thing they did in 2006 was drafting Pennington, Merz and Butler. They hit on 1 and that’s the way it goes. I hope to see the same this year, with hopefully a DE and LB in the top 3 rounds and 2-3 OL in the later rounds
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
I think a correlation can be made that the higher the lineman draft pick, the better the chance that pick sticks with the team. I looked at the last 4 drafts for the Steelers, Pats, and Giants, perennial powerhouses. Then I looked at who is on their roster. Including TE’s the results are:
Steelers – 9 linemen drafted since 2005, 5 on the roster. Of those 5, one is later than a 4th round pick – Kris Kemoeatu (6th, 2005).
Pats – 10 linemen drafted since 2005, 5 on the roster. 2 on the roster chosen later than the 4th round, (Ryan O’Callaghan, 5th, 2006, and LeKevin Smith, 6th, 2006).
Giants – 8 linemen drafted since 2005, an amazing 7 still on the roster. 3 rostered players taken later than the 4th (Kevin Boss 5th, 2007, Adam Koets, 6th, 2006, and Eric Moore, 6th, 2005). An exceptional job G men.
The Bills have picked 12 linemen in that time and 6 are still on the roster. 3 were chosen after round 4 (Bell, Williams and Butler).
As the old saying goes, by and large you get what you pay for. There is also something to be said for the quality of a team’s draft evaluators (duh).
everything goes better with a BIG MACK
All great NFL franchises place a strong emphasis on building dominating lines. If a proven formula for success. Too bad the current FO of the Bills hasn’t figured this out yet.
I think that's a little unfair to say they haven't addressed it.
The Bills spent a lot of money two offseasons ago to shore up the line. They have drafted and developed players to put into the line as well. To say they haven’t put an emphasis on building a dominating line isn’t excatly true. Plus, you know they will draft at least two guys this year for the O Line.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 27, 2009 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions
And the Steelers line wasn't great this year.
And the Giants are looking to add at least one OL player.
The higher you draft a lineman, the better chance they have of staying on your team just like every other position. They are the most talented and you have the biggest investment in them, financially and time spent. It’s a lot harder to cut bait.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 27, 2009 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Do you count Jason Peters as roster depth?
With Offensive / Defensive linemen they for the most part take years to develop fully, even early selections. The only way to guarantee them the time is by picking them later in the draft, or as URFAs, Especially defensive tackles take years to come to fruition. Pat Williams was undrafted. I might put something together to show just how many OL / DL players are from the 4th through undrafted.
ape.
I am sure that for the most part trench players can be great no matter where you draft them, and drafting one in the first few rounds doesn’t guarantee success. Long term franchise success probably hinges on having a good core of skill position players so you can concentrate on drafting multiple trench players every year to develop. If your team is in a postion to draft a needed skill player early, and 3-4 OL / DL every year for the future, you’re in good shape.
by syrbillsfan on Mar 27, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Well Peters was brought in by the prior regime as an undrafted TE, so no I wouldn’t even consider him relevant for this discussion. This is about Jauron and company’s tenure, and their drafts, not Donohoe’s.
I agree that trench players can be found late in drafts all the time. However, I don’t agree that a team should rely on that formula. At some point, you have to spend some early picks on linemen.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
What about Undrafted free Agents
Long time reader, first time poster….I think you guys are great. Keep up the good work Brian and Crew.
I think one stat that would be interesting when talking draft classes is how many UDFA Jauron has hit on. Somtimes that can make or break a draft class. We all know he hit on Freddie Jackson and what about Greer and Peters. From what I see around the NFL, most teams hit on a UDFA from time to time to make up for busts like McCargo, JP.
Welcome....
Van Miller, the legendary voice of the Bills, is from Dunkirk, NY.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Good Ole Van
Yeah, he is a ledgend down here. Too bad the Bills moved Training Camp years ago, I miss meeting all the Bills players and seeing them around town.
by DukeOfDunkirk on Mar 26, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Speak for yourself!
I lve three minutes from St. John Fisher. :-)
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Ha...
No I teach Middle School in a different Rochester suburb. St. John Fisher is a college and I am nowhere near that level….
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Well at least you live near it. I can only watch these guys on TV.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 26, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Greer and Peters pre-dated Jauron’s arrival in Buffalo.
Aside from Jackson, John DiGiorgio would probably qualify as his best UDFA in Buffalo. He’s also been a part of quality street free agent signings like Kirk Chambers and Bryan Scott.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh, and welcome to the site. :)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions
True
I thought that Peters and Greer were there before Jauron but wasnt sure, thanks. Jackson and DiGirogio were good pickups, obviously not impact players but great depth/role players. I would really like to see Jauron continue with his drafting position obsession and load up on linemen, grab 2 guards and a DT, DE. All games are won or lost in the trenches. Those players have the biggest impact on making the ones around them better.
by DukeOfDunkirk on Mar 26, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
I have a question for you Brian
In 1999, with 13 picks in tow, the Bears selected three wide receivers and three linebackers (as well as two defensive backs)
My question is what was Chicago’s greatest needs that year? Were those picks based on best available athletes or more stocking up on positions of need?
In 2000, the Bears selected three more defensive backs, as well as two more receivers and linebackers
Did they lose their #1 receiver that year and I suppose that neither one of the three WRs drafted the previous year was making an impact? So again, were these more positions of greatest need?
Through your analysis did you see a pattern for drafting more on needs vs best available athlete?
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
Here's a question for you...
name those receivers. :-) I think you will get my point.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Matt’s point.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Exactly.
You had to look every one of those WRs up except maybe Booker. To put it nicely, they were all “unsuccessful” so they had to continue to upgrade the position. Booker is probably the only Bears WR I could name from the last ten years except Hester who is not really a WR. Maybe Marcus Robinson….
By 2002, Dez White and Booker were the two starters. Not really a top notch receiving corps.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Bernard Berrian. He’s turning out to be quite the WR.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 26, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Right - He was drafted in 2004.
because the guys drafted in 99 and 00 didn’t work out.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Well you asked for good WR's they drafted in the last 10 years
and theres 3 of them, Booker, Barrian and Hester…. thats a HORRIBLE success rate.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 26, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't classify Roscoe as a successful receiver...
and for the same reasons don’t classify Hester that way.
The point was about when Jauron was there, why did they draft so many WRs. Only one of them worked out (Booker)
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions
They kept on trying for sucess?... and kept on failing.
I’m guessing that it doesn’t all land on DJ though. I mean theres a GM and a scouting staff involved in the process. Sure DJ isn’t a great drafter, but he’s not a bad one either. In the early rounds with us he, and the rest of Buffalo’s scouting staff, have been about 50/50, but they’ve been great in finding and molding talent from the later rounds.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 26, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah but I actually meant that Zumone won the point you offered. You know, like lick your finger, tally in mid-air…
Nevermind.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I know what you mean...
don’t worry.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Ha. It’s just that sometimes, my jokes go over people’s heads. Or, far more often, they’re just not that funny.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Sulecio Sanford
went on to play for the Scottish Claymores. His favorite TV show was Matlock and he enjoys rap music.
Here’s a Windy City Gridiron Review of teh 1999 draft. Don’t ask me why.
I have absolutely no idea what their perceived needs were that year, and I highly doubt I’d be able to find out. While you’re right that it would be an interesting study, ultimately it would be based more on perception and memory of a Bears fan than anything else.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions
I think a trend that would be very relevant is if a guy tends to favor NEED over BAT (Best available Talent).
Somehow, I think DJ goes more for need, he’s proven that quite a few times in the past.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
So basicly what all of this means...
Is theyre drafting a DE or LB.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 26, 2009 1:53 PM EDT reply actions
i think
if I had to guess with 7 picks how it will break down position wise I would guess in no particular order:
1 LB, 2 OL, 1 TE, 1 S, 1 DE, 1 CB
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
Out of that list, I think we might see S become DE depending on talent available at that pick
But otherwise, I think your spot on Marv
If the Bills were a drug, I could only hope they were like speed so I could lose some weight as well.
im hoping
they surprise us with a Safety if the value is their in round 3-4. I think if Jauron has a guy he really likes and it’s great value, ala Trent Edwards value in 2007, I can see us taking a S earlier than most expect
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
History has also shown us he likes to draft multiple players at positions
I wouldn’t be surprised to see two DEs and two OL (I had two in my mock)
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
However,
Jauron also knows that he’s got to do something different if he wants to keep his job. DJ even admitted as much by repeatedly saying “We’ve got to score more points” in his first offseason interview. If anything, this could lead to the conclusion that DJ will buck his normal drafting tendencies this year, particularly early, in hopes of landing an offensive impact player that could fulfill his prophecy, scoring the Bills more points, and thus saving his job.
It’s just not reasonable to assume that TO is going to be the Bills’ only real attempt at increasing their offensive output. By real attempt I mean a skill player, not a day-two depth offensive lineman.
I like the thought, but even agreeing with the opinion (Jauron might change things up this year), I don’t think you HAVE to reach the conclusion you came to.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Whoops, pinkies got enter-happy and tab-happy at the wrong time…
I do think it’s reasonable to assume that T.O. is going to be the Bills’ only real attempt at increasing their offensive output, outside of the offensive line. They won’t do much for the skill positions, outside of MAYBE a tight end. They’ll draft one, but I don’t think they view that position as must-address on the first day.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions
He already bucked his normal tendancies to bring in T.O.
They will probably draft another TE but in the 3rd or later.
I don’t know what position you are looking for, Dyl, to add another offensive playmaker at other than TE.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not sure what position I'm looking at either.
Sorry, didn’t mean to call you unreasonable. :) I meant that, by the tone Dick Jauron seemed to set for the upcoming season, it seemed squarely obvious that something meaningful was going to be done about our offensive firepower. Jauron spoke with enough conviction on that topic to make it appear that offensive output was going to be his number 1 priority for 2009.
Running that through the lens of post-Owens Buffalo:
Clearly Jauron is impressed by Owens’ career stats. But for this big of a team need, does this one move constitute our strategy for improvement? A thin line, whether it be injury, character issues, or lack of past production, is standing between what we have now and the 2008 Buffalo Bills offense. Surely Jauron has a contingency plan. I Surely he isn’t banking on someone he doesn’t fully understand. No, no, it just doesn’t make sense.
With a month left before the draft, and trade rumors sure to be rampant, I think TE is a very real possibility for a high pick.
“…and in their desperation they turned to a man they didn’t fully understand.” – The Dark Knight
I didn't think you called me unreasonable.
But you don’t think the addition of T.O. along with a more focused power rushing strategy is meaningful?
The move of Josh Reed to the slot should not be overlooked either. He will have a better season and so will Evans. Add in even a declining T.O. and you have a potent passing attack. Keep handing the rock off to Edwards and Jackson and you have an offense baby.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 26, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions
That might be another nice change,
But I see no evidence to believe that the Bills will shift to a power running strategy in year 4 (and year 2 of Turk Schonert) of Jauron’s regime. Our offensive line has been dismantled, and Dockery’s strength was run-blocking. Robert Royal was released, and his strength was blocking. The personnel changes and coaching continuity are signs that don’t point to a Steeler-like run-first offense in the making. Is there anything I’m missing?
And our draft pick will be a fine run blocker...
as will Derek Fine, as will Kirk Chambers and Geoff Hangartner.
The Steelers O Line was terrible last year.
And I think what you are missing is that in year 1 for Turk, he passed a little more than he probably should have. The only way he would have kept his job if he had a nice convo with DJ and DJ said, “Look, we need to run the ball more. Can you do that? Then you can stay. If not, go coach with Steve at Colorado State.”
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 27, 2009 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Will, will, will be. How about "are"?
Average Steeler line play tends to be exactly that, a one-year blip. As ‘terrible’ as it was, somehow Pittsburgh is Super Bowl Champion.
I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree, Matt. I like the information you’re presenting, but just find the end conclusion unconvincing. Even if we do like Fine, Chambers, and Hangartner for run-blocking, don’t we still find a way to keep either Royal or Dockery to make that attribute a strength? Maybe you’re right, and the Bills don’t mind letting them go — but I can’t see those moves as indications that the Bills are planning to stake their identity by plowing the field next year. If anything the acquisition of TO and the talk about Trent needing to take a step up and become a force in the offense, along with the release of Dockery (not a great pass blocker) seem to say we’re gonna keep on passin’.
As for the conversation, we can only guess what was said. Though it’s likely that Schonert’s experience led him to pass more than DJ would have liked, no reporters or team sources have indicated Jauron even cared about this.
.
I think there might be a bit of a DB trend, but there’s a lot that goes into a draft that I think this can be read into more than what actually is going on. For example:
The biggest thing is a team’s need. If you’re bad at a position you’re going to try and fill it, even if it’s the same as the previous year. Similarly, if you’re strong at one position consistently you don’t need to take anyone there.
When a player is taken. Taking a position in the later rounds isn’t the same as taking a position early on. That is a 5th and 7th round DB isn’t the same as a 1st and 3rd OL (hypothetically). Looking at first day picks might be more useful, but then you run into sample size issues (and these other factors).
Each year certain positions are stronger than others. Maybe one year you take a 7th round flier on a WR but another year you avoid that because the position is weak.
I'm not so sure Jauron has been the final decision maker in the draft
i doubt Jerry Angelo in Chicago or Marv Levy in Buffalo abdicated their authority on personnel to Jauron. Jauron certainly was consulted. But both these GM have the strong will and personalities to guide their ship the way they seen fit. Perhaps now in Buffalo with an add executive and an absentee head of scouting, Jauron has more input. But I would argue seven of the eight years Jauron was head coach he offered suggestions, but was not the final decision maker.
I never made the claim that he was. In Chicago.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions
No, I understood you. I mentioned in the article, though, that it was important to note that Jauron wasn’t the final decision-maker in Chicago. I still think it’s relevant. It’s fine that you don’t, but it puzzles me how eight years of drafting is irrelevant. You honestly think that his history has zero bearing on the upcoming draft?
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Mar 26, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Fom Jerry Angelo’s Wikipedia:
Since taking over the Chicago Bears in 2001, Angelo had a tenuous road ahead of him. Dick Jauron, the coach at the time, had in his contract that he was to have control of the player roster, which entitled him to the GM powers that Angelo was supposed to have. The relationship between the 2 was at best, grating, and at worst, downright horrible.
Then, during the 2003 season, Ed McCaskey died, thus spreading out the shares he had, and allowing the other McCaskey children to take the majority share away from his wife Virginia Halas McCaskey and eldest son Michael McCaskey. Thus this led to Angelo finally being elevated to full GM and powers (instead of name only). It also signaled the end of Dick Jauron, who was fired at the end of the season.
by syrbillsfan on Mar 27, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Free agency / Trades too
Good article Brian. I think the drafts have definitely left the offense a little out in the cold, but I think the positionally heavy drafting requires a bit of a disclaimer. Drafting very evenly is a luxury Jauron has never had in Buffalo. Although he has drafted few OL high in the draft, it was also the first position that was invested heavily in the free agency. That bought him a couple years to focus on other areas.
I think the DB phenomena is intersting, but probably is a result of the high price on the market for DB free agents. When you can’t affod to keep Clements, or even Greer, you’re always going to need DB’s.
That said, there is positionally heavy drafting, but that doesn’t mean that other positions are being neglected (and I don’t think you are implying that Brian, but others have drawn that conclusion). Last year’s draft seemed to by all about the DB’s and WR’s. When you take into account the free agency and Stroud trade, you see 4 new members of the front 7: Stroud, Johnson, Mitchell and Bowen, and 4 new members of the backfield: McKelvin, Corner, Cox and Will James.
On offense they picked up the 2 WR’s in the draft, but also an OL (Bell), TE (Fine) and a RB (Oman), and they signed Courtney Anderson (TE).
I forgot about Chris Ellis. So 2008 brought in 3 new DL, 2 LB and 4 DBs. If any position got neglected last year it was safety, ironically part of the defensive backfield!
I think you are correct in also using Free Agency...
People don’t always equate it with the draft and focus solely on drafting positionally.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Mar 27, 2009 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions

by 





















