Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Jason Peters vs Andre Smith

Ed. Note, by Brian Galliford: ForeignArrow is in my head, folks.  I planned on doing a poll just like this today.  We'll just use FA's fine work instead.  Don't forget about Tuesday Morning Bills Trivia, either.

Is anybody else as tired as I am of the way Jason Peters does business? There's a certain amount of arrogance to him that I, as a fan, overlooked because of his great play. But he began to wear his welcome during last season when he would be questioned about his performances, in particular when he was asked about a sack he gave up to Joey Porter. Peters played it off as Porter just made a "hustle play." Well, I don't know what's worse: just getting beat by Joey Porter or out-hustled by him.The correct answer to that question, Jason, is... "I got beat on that play, it was my fault, and I'm going to work my tail off so it doesn't happen again." Even if you don't think it was your fault (he clearly felt Trent should have gotten rid of the ball by that point), you be a professional and say the right thing.

Anyway, in spite of his selfishness, the best-case-scenario for the Bills is still to re-sign him; it's just one less hole to fill. However, our intel report from the reliable Geronimo indicates that to be a stretch. The intelligence also indicates that Buffalo favors Andre Smith, at least in terms of available rookies. 

Well, as a UF alum, I've watched my fair share of SEC football. Andre Smith is a franchise left tackle. I remember the first snap I saw him play as a freshman, and he looked like a re-incarnate of Orlando Pace, but more athletic. Before his suspension for the Utah game, he was basically the consensus best OL in the draft. Well, the fact that he's a little immature (crazy for a 21-year old, right?) doesn't change that in my eyes. I mean, Andre Smith is immature because he's a kid coming out of college; what's Jason Peters' excuse? The issues with Smith of work ethic and immaturity can (and likely will be) cured by a locker room full of vets and hard workers. There's not much you can do as a franchise to ameliorate the avarice of a non-cooperative player. I expect Smith's transition to the NFL to be seamless, at least physically. He's faced size and speed in the SEC, so that's not really a concern for me. The hardest thing to speculate is how a player will handle the jump mentally: will it be a quantum leap for them or hop-skotch? If I had to guess, I would say Smith will be fine. His scouting reports say that he knows his assignments and he did practice against Nick Saban's 3-4 defenses everyday (a huge bonus for a guy coming to the AFC East).

The only way the Bills will win in this situation (a Peters trade) is if they get fair value for him. It's simply not an option to settle for anything less than a first rounder for Peters. If that's the case, then Buffalo will have won the day... because as far as I'm concerned, in a season or two, Smith will be an upgrade over Peters.

Poll
Which player do you want starting for Buffalo on opening day?
Jason Peters
322 votes
Andre Smith
379 votes

701 votes | Poll has closed

Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.

Comment 157 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I defended Peters quite a bit, and I don’t regret it, but given his actions of late, i am pretty much through defending him. Of the top OTs in this draft, there really isn’t a single one of them that i don’t like. If the Bills front office likes Smith the best, okay fine by me.

Right now I would take a second round pick for Peters and draft an OT at 11.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 30, 2009 11:09 PM EDT reply actions  

It seems to me...

that the Lions are the best trade partners. They have two 1st rounders and an early 2nd to negotiate with. That should be a Lions fan’s dream, to be able to get a LT and a QB. And it would serve due justice to Peters for wanting money more than anything else. He’ll have to live in the hell-hole of Detroit and lose for the rest of his career. Peace.

What a degenerate condition to be in… forsaking everything (loyalty, winning, comradeship) for money, when you’re already making millions to play a child’s game. People shrug it off because they’re entertained by professional sports… but it cannot be overstated.

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

That should be a Lions fan’s dream, to be able to get a LT and a QB.

Not if they have to pay out $120M to do it…

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 8:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not if they have to pay out $120M to do it…

Oh come now Brian, that’s not fair. Besides if Peters gets his price it will cost them closer to 140M than 120.

by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 31, 2009 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

How is that not fair? Jordan Gross signed a 6-year, $60M deal with $30.5M guaranteed. Jake Long signed a 5 year, $57.75M deal with $30M guaranteed. Atlanta’s Matt Ryan, the first QB taken last year (#3 overall), signed a 6-year, $72M deal with $34.75M guaranteed.

Yeah… $120M total might be low-balling. If FA meant Stafford and Peters, which is how I interpreted it, they would have to pay at least that much to sign both of them.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

By I was sarcastic about the not fair comment, although i do think that $120M is low balling it. I think peters want a 6 year deal with Jake Long type money, so 6 years, 70M, and I think that Stafford would get roughly the same deal as Ryan, if not a bit more. So I legitimatly think that it would cost the Lions closer (if not over) $140M than it would $20M.

by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 31, 2009 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

What a degenerate condition to be in… forsaking everything (loyalty, winning, comradeship) for money, when you’re already making millions to play a child’s game. People shrug it off because they’re entertained by professional sports… but it cannot be overstated.

I agree and I disagree. I agree with everything except the making millions part. Peters did get a nice extension a few years ago, but he isn’t making HUGE money, which is what he is after. For the most part you are right, but I just think that it’s not like he has made the big money you are talking about.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

But to be realistic, making 3 million a year IS huge. Imagine if you could make that much money a year for 5 years. He’ll still make more in 5 years than most of the world will in their entire lives. He’ll probably make more money in 5 years than all of the Sudan will.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes to you and me that is a ton of money, but in comparison to other people in his profession, it’s not.

Also, he still has to pay taxes on that money and pay his agent, he would be lucky to see half of that 3 million a year.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess I would love to see these guys try and make it in the real world before I feel sorry for them and their "money" problems.

Maybe he can get the Celino and Barnes endorsement?

“Kids, i’ve got a ton of time on my hands while I sit out training camp and the regular season. I encourage you to do your work as I don’t do mine.”

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

78% of all NFL players file for bankruptcy or are close to it within two years of retirement. You do realize that he never sees that $3 million right? NFL players are taxed just like the rest of us. Actually no, they’re taxed completely unlike us. Unless you’re in the highest tax bracket.

How long do you plan on working? 30 – 40 years? At most an NFL player is looking at playing half that and the majority won’t even make it 1/8 of that. Then what? Peters has nothing else to fall back on. We all know he’s not the brightest bulb. He’s not going to settle into a cozy desk job at the local real estate developers office. I can’t fault him for wanting everything he can get right now, he’s going to need it and need it for the majority of his life. (NFL pensions don’t really help much. Darrell Green, who played 20 years!, will only get $70,000 before taxes. A player who played 5 years will, on average, only see $12,000.) Especially when he looks around and sees players less valuable than himself making much more.

And don’t forget that you and I (well at least I) don’t work for a multi-billion dollar a year business. Our pay scale isn’t comparable at all.

by twoeightnine on Mar 31, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do understand most players see less than half the money they sign for

but it’s not my fault they’re not smart enough to stash cash away. When you make that much money, you hire a financial advisor, and you DO NOT give it to your high school buddy to invest in some pyramid scheme.

Again, I could give 2 “you know what’s” about a player’s inability to integrate into normal society once they’re retired. Why are they treated better than service men and women? Those folks have just as many (no WAAAAAAAAAAAY more) challenges when re-joining society.

If these guys would take advantage of the other 80% of time/abilities that a college scholarship gives them, they wouldn’t be playing like life was over after football.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

None of that excuses the frivolous spending that lands most of these players in bankruptcy. If you know you’re not going to be making that kind of money for the rest of your life, that right there is an indication that a person is smart enough to sock away a lot of it. Do most of them do that? No.

by thefourwinds on Mar 31, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

this was a response to twoeightnine.

by thefourwinds on Mar 31, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well...

let me put it this way….. 99% of the people on this planet will not make anything close to amount of money Jason Peters would make with the extension he signed with the Bills. It’s a pretty relative and philosophical argument, but if you’re not happy with a seven figure salary to play football… something much greater than money is missing in your life (IMO).

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

As I said, in a way I don’t disagree with you, but it is also relative to the amount of money he could be making.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s true, that it’s all relative. However, I know that in another city, i’d be making a lot more than I do now, and in the same field. I don’t ruffle the feathers of my superiors about that because I know the reality of the situation.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

either

im going to say im really tired of this annual cheese and wine festival that a certian UNDRAFTED overweight tightend turned left tackle directs and stars in. How arrogant can you be? The team works you out, gives you orphane butt a home and this is the nest you can do for them. WOW. the only reason i dont say trade him now is i think we have too many holes to fill without having to replace the left tackle who gave up more sacks then any other starting left tackle in the afc. If we do decide to get rid of the excess baggage (all 320 lbs.) then i hope we get just compensation for him, like enough pabst to forget his name. Jk but really a first and a third.

Wearing this Jumpsuit, my new Nikes and drinking the Bill's flavoured Kool-Aid pretty much all my life.

by Stabby Mcshank on Mar 30, 2009 11:55 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm not sure about Smith

His playing ability is unquestionable, but his mental state scares me. He’s got Mike Williams written all over him according to me.

by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 31, 2009 1:21 AM EDT reply actions  

No...

he doesn’t.

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think it can be definitively claimed either way, actually. The dude has yet to spend a second with an NFL coach on an NFL practice field.

That being said, I’m not passing on a guy with the potential Smith has simply because Mike Williams was a bust. That’s called drafting scared.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

mike williams

has nothing to do with this. But being FAT is being FAT. And Andrew SMith is FAT and LAZY and just doesn’t get it. That said, his play was dominant at times and he was a CLEAR CUT TOP 10 pick 4 months ago. I just can’t roll the dice on a FAT rookie LT who may have no motivation once he deposits $13-14 million guaranteed into his piggy bank

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

That was my general sentiment when I compared him to Williams.

Smith is a very, very, VERY good LT, but I’m afraid of what might happen once he turns pro. I’m not sure that he’s the kind of risk that I’m willing to put money on, especially if we trade Peters. I’d be MUCH more comfortable with a LT like Oher.

by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 31, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Andrew SMith is FAT and LAZY and just doesn’t get it.

Fat is fat, true. Fat isn’t necessarily lazy, though. You’re drawing a conclusion that isn’t necessarily true. How do you know that he hasn’t been a porker his entire life? Might not mean anything about his work ethic…

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did a fat person sit on you or something?

I hate to burst your bubble a lot of NFL linemen are fat. And his name is Andre Smith, so it sounds like the only thing you’re going on is that he’s fat, because you don’t even know the guy’s name… am I supposed to believe you’ve even seen him play?

It’s pretty amazing the love BJ Raji gets for a guy who is “fat,” missed a year of playing time, and has work ethic and weight issues…. I don’t see anybody moving him out of the top 10.

But hey Marv, at least you brought something insightful to the conversation.

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

And his name is Andre Smith, so it sounds like the only thing you’re going on is that he’s fat, because you don’t even know the guy’s name… am I supposed to believe you’ve even seen him play?

Dude, come on – ever heard of a typo? The ‘w’ is right next to the ‘e’…

But hey Marv, at least you brought something insightful to the conversation.

Sigh. Ah, the Internet. Civility is next to godliness, folks.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hah, good call on Andrew ---> Andre

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

You got me Brian

Im workin on it

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

so i added a W…my apologies…. So your telling me you think it’s cool for a guy to show up to the combine weighing 360 or more, completely out of shape, say he is going to work out, then not work out, and completely dip out without telling ANYBODY and then tell the NFLN that he is “sorry but is going to go back home to Alabama and he can’t WAIT to workout there” and then he gets ready for his pro day and puts up numbers that wouldn’t put him in the top 10 of any OL that worked out at the COMBINE? I’d say that’s insightful.

Im not hating on the guy just cuz he’s fat. I’ve stated his college production is great, and 4 months ago he was a consensus top 10 pick. What I AM Saying, is I don’t trust a guy that could get by on natural ability in COLLEGE, because the NFL is a whole different ball game. And if he can’t commit to working out for the most important job interviews of his life at the COMBINE and PRO DAY that shows me that he doesn’t have a WORK ETHIC.

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

going to go back home to Alabama and he can’t WAIT to workout there" and then he gets ready for his pro day and puts up numbers that wouldn’t put him in the top 10 of any OL that worked out at the COMBINE?

The fact that people reported bad things about his Pro Day should mean nothing. Man boobs aside, he had a pretty stellar workout. Teams will look into his supposed character issues. I still think he’s a Top 10 pick.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

i agree

but his numbers don’t stack up to the top 10 OL at the combine. That’s not saying he had a bad pro day, that’s just fact. His college production vetoes everything here but he has red flag after red flag with how he has handled his situation leading up to the Draft

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Concerns....

It’s not that I don’t care about Andre Smith’s mishaps. I just don’t think they’re as momentous as the media reports them to be. News is news to them. But when I heard what Smith did it never once compelled me to think that I wouldn’t love for him to be a Bill. I was embarrassed for him because he screwed up. And the mistakes these guys make are magnified, amplified, and over-analyzed to a disgusting degree. So it’s fair for you to be skeptical of the guy, I just wanted something more from you than “he’s fat.” That bugged me.

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

understandable

but these guys when they do their pro days and stuff, the results = draft slot & thus $$$$$$ It just is a bad sign if he doesn’t perform or handle these things like a professional because it really does bring in question his work ethic.

But maybe he is dealing with family issues, or some kind of personal issues. Whatever the case, again I say his play on the field clearly elicits him being a top 10 pick. But you have to be getting a guy who WANTS to play football, and has a track record of work ethic and desire. If those questions are answered sufficient enough to OBD, then I will be fine if they pick him

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

With respect....

I dont care if the guy has breasts bigger than dolly parton….i dont care if he can only bench the likes of a big mac 15 times…..i care if he has good use of hands, can take the impact of the first initial bull rush and if he can dance waltz. THAT is what makes a good OL.

"If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?"
~Vince Lombardi~

by Hambone on Apr 1, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve defended Peters before and have been weary of Smith, but you make some good points FA. I do worry a bit about how he’d handle NFL speed rushers and his weight. However, he is a very good player and probably a player worthy of being a borderline top 10 pick, even with his issues. Peters is starting to get on my nerves, so if it comes to the point where he is traded, so be it. I just want to make sure we get a player that will be a very good NFL LT to replace him. If it’s Smith, fine. We also need to get value for Peters, and that value is a 1st round pick, at least. Does it really do this team any good if we get a mid 2nd round pick and have to take Smith at #11? We’ve got to get a high pick for Peters simply because of what it’ll take to replace him.

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Mar 31, 2009 2:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Peters is starting to get on my nerves

??? Peters has been on my nerves for a long, long time. I had very little hope that he would grow up this year, especially after his joke Pro Bowl nomination.

by thefourwinds on Mar 31, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Peters is worth more than a #1 draft pick. For crying out loud, Dallas traded a 1st, 3rd, and horse poop for Roy Williams.

A pro bowl LT tackle entering his prime is worth at least three day one draft picks.

by krytime on Mar 31, 2009 3:58 AM EDT reply actions  

For crying out loud, Dallas traded a 1st, 3rd, and horse poop for Roy Williams.

One stupid trade won’t set the market though, kry. There’s a reason that that trade still stands alone in Stupidville – no other franchise is willing to make a deal that dumb.

I’m with Eric. I’d take a 2 from certain teams at this point.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

nothing less than a mid-first rounder

or a late first + a 3rd

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not going to happen.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

well

The Vikings gave up a 1st and 2 3rd’s for Jared Allen. I think the Bills should at MINIMUM get a 2nd and a 5th for Peters. If you get a 2nd and a 5th, and use those extra picks to trade back up and get Pettigrew, and take Smith at #11, or go get Clay Matthews along with Smith, that would be a solid…..Problem is, does Dick Jauron really want to have his blind side guarded by a jello-jiggling, 21 year old rookie?

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think a 2nd and a low round pick NEXT year isn’t out of the question. Everyone forgets how badly Peters played at times last year. You have a guy who claims to be a top three talent, but would have a hard time proving he is a top fifteen talent after last year. Everyone likes to say that the Bills should get the proper value in return for Peters, but I ask; What is the proper value for a LT who gave up more sacks then any other OT last year, while only playing 13 games, and holding out all camp, and wants to be paid like a king?

Give me a 2nd rounder and I’ll be happy we got that much for his tired act.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

How did we get from Peters is a franchise LT who the Bills can't even think about trading

to he is not worth a first round pick? Are the Bills going to let him shop himself? Like I said before, he needs a dose of reality. If we can’t get a 1st for him, then it is time to play hard ball. We own is butt for 3 years. If he wants to waste 3 years of his career and the salary that goes with it…so be it. We take the hit. Draft Smith at #11 and move on. This is a game of chicken folks!

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

This team needs to win now. Can we afford to play footsies with Peters? I don’t think so. He is a headache, take an aspirin (dump him on somebody else) and move on.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

i disagree

 look at how dominant he was the last 6-7 games. He was blocking guys at the 2nd level and was a beast. He is a MAULER. His pass blocking was iffy at times but I contribute that to a) Derrick Dockery and b) holding out and not knowing hte system as well as he could have.

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well...

you could question his heart and his passion. He doesn’t seem to give a sh&% about winning…. just getting paid apparently. One thing that always bugged me about Peters is that he doesn’t finish his blocks. He doesn’t block to the whistle, which is why he’s responsible for tackles in the backfield sometimes or sacks.

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plus

That trade also cost them 7 mil and change while dumping Owens.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I still think Michael Oher is the best OT in the Draft, but I’ve always liked Smith as well. Heck, Jason Smith and Monroe are pretty good too. It would depend on the availability; it’d be a pretty bad idea to move Peters without knowing for sure that one of those tackles would be available.

There’s a great deal of risk in moving Peters, particularly due to the fact that the trade would likely occur on draft day. I voted for Peters. Let’s see if we can’t talk him down a few million over the next few weeks.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 8:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Smith has the longest arms of all LT prospects

Oher has relatively short arms. Smith has more potential upside and in my scenario (see below) I propose to keep Peters if we don’t get the right compensation for him so we’d have a great insurance policy. In that scenario, I much prefer drafting the best “potential” LT

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Perfect Solution: Draft Smith & keep Peters

If Smith drops to us at #11, we pick him up. We do not sell-out for anything less than a mid first rounder or a late + a 3rd for Peters. If we can’t move peters, then we make him play out his contract (3M/y is cheap for a LT). We have the rookie as an insurance policy and we have trade bait for the next 2 years…

Peters would be stuck between a rock and a very hard place because if he were to sit out again this year he could lose his starting spot to the rookie and then his value on the market will plunge. This is a business and I sure hope that OBD plays hardball on this one.

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 8:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think that works. The trade value isn’t magically going to stay the same if Peters sits the bench for two years. In fact, it’d go down. If you want the highest possible trade value, you trade him ASAP. That’s just how the market works.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I totally disagree on this one

At 3M he is cheap and you need depth at the position anyway. Lets agree that we’d be overpaying by say 2M for a backup left tackle. It provides us the luxury of being able to draft the best possible LT, the one with the biggest upside without giving up the 2009 season. There is no way that Peters is that dumb, if we call his bluff – he’ll show up to play. He’ll know that his days in Buffalo are counted and he’ll play hard for his next contract. If he sits out, he’ll be the biggest looser. We’ll have saved the games that he sat out so our cost is even lower than the 2M.

The proper strategy on this one is to regain the leverage in the negotiation and then trade him.

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

At 3M he is cheap and you need depth at the position anyway.

I never said he wouldn’t be cheap at that price; he is. But $3M is also pretty steep for a guy that will ultimately only play six games a year for you to collect a paycheck. There’s no way he’d voluntarily play a full season knowing he was a backup. He’d sit for ten weeks, report, then sip Gatorade on the sideline while collecting $500K a game. The Bills won’t let that happen, and they’d be pretty stupid to.

There is no way that Peters is that dumb, if we call his bluff – he’ll show up to play. He’ll know that his days in Buffalo are counted and he’ll play hard for his next contract.

Again, no he won’t. That’s where our fundamental difference in opinion lies. The Bills won’t gain any advantage by letting Peters sit out. They’ll have a large chunk of salary on their books going to a guy who isn’t happy, isn’t working and wants out. That’s so far from being a good idea for a small market team and a team-building standpoint that I find it hard to believe anyone would think otherwise.

I don’t mind the “play hardball” thing, but it has to end in salary negotiations. If the Bills can’t talk him down, they’ll trade him during the draft. That’s really the long and short of it. There is quite literally a 0% chance they let this thing drag out, ESPECIALLY voluntarily.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I still disagree with you buddy

The market for Peters after the draft is going to be better. Right now teams in the market for a LT see a deep draft class and will not fork over much value in exchange for Peters, especially since he wants to be paid like the best LT in the league. If we take on the the premier LTs at #11, we change the scenery and there is a chance that we could actually trade him during day 1 after we pick but even if we do not, leading into the season with Peters on our roster is not a bad situation. Trading for 2010 picks would be fine too.

Also, the last thing you want to do is show other players that by sitting out you force their hand to trade you (for anything even a 2nd) and you get your big contract… I think that the Bills gain a lot more playing hard ball and not letting themselves get pushed around. Peters will cave and play and even if he doesn’t at 3M it’s still well wortth it to play hard ball.

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right now teams in the market for a LT see a deep draft class and will not fork over much value in exchange for Peters, especially since he wants to be paid like the best LT in the league.

Agreed here. Which is why I said any trade of Peters wouldn’t happen until draft day.

Trading for 2010 picks would be fine too.

Agreed. The Bills may very well entertain the idea of trading for future picks on draft day, but only because they’re ready to move on – and move on as in Peters won’t be on the roster in 2009.

Also, the last thing you want to do is show other players that by sitting out you force their hand to trade you (for anything even a 2nd) and you get your big contract

Two things – I honestly don’t see many players having the leverage to do that, in the near future at least, and I don’t think it sets any sort of precedent. It’s not like the Bills haven’t been trying to negotiate with Peters. They want to pay him. They’re just not going to make him the game’s highest-paid tackle, and rightfully so. Buffalo isn’t playing hardball in the sense that they’re not negotiating with him, and that’s important to remember. They WANT him here. That eradicates the type of precedent you’re citing.

Peters will cave and play and even if he doesn’t at 3M it’s still well wortth it to play hard ball.

It’s not worth it to have a $3M reserve lineman who doesn’t want to be here and already has issues. Trust me. The Bills are smart enough to not let that situation develop on the roster, particularly with a certain Mr. Owens already in the locker room.

You and I see eye-to-eye on everything about this except his being on the roster next year. If the Bills decide to trade him, they’ll trade him. They aren’t going to let him fester on the roster as a lame duck, and that’s absolutely the right decision to make.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

He’d sit for ten weeks, report, then sip Gatorade on the sideline while collecting $500K a game

Then fine the hell out of him, subtract that from his paycheck, and ban him from the facility for the rest of the season.

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Were those supposed fines from last offseason even imposed?

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's the worst case

that could happen with Jason Peters—I’ve read somewhere that he doesn’t have to show up until week ten of the season to get credit for the year is that correct? Now add four weeks to get in shape and we’re at week fourteen before he’s up to speed-not good and he could do that for the next two years, really bad for us. So he may hold more cards than we think wouldn’t the team we try to trade him to want a contract in place before a trade takes place and does any other team willing to make him the highest paid LT in the league? Another point in his favor, to hold up the Bills. This is a real bad situation for us.

Bills Fan in PA

by BILLS on Mar 31, 2009 8:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Good points. The mistake Peters is making is thinking that his advantages will force the Bills into meeting his contract demands. They won’t. And they shouldn’t. He’s good, but he’s not the best.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is he good because he learned on the fly? What if he was a LT in college, and his game was more widely understood? I still think he’s “great” by most because he was undrafted and converted. I don’t know if he’s great because he trumps all other LTs.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

He does not hold the cards

The only reason that he can hold out now is that he knows that we don’t have any other better option than him. By drafting a LT, we change that. If he holds out he basically will have taken a year off, then if he’s dumb enough to do it two years in a row – who the hell would want him? Look at LeCharles Bentley, a probowler that after two years off – nobody wants?? And this guy didn’t even have attitude problems!

I’m telling you there is no way that Peters sits out if we draft a LT. Plus, if we draft a LT, and go into 2009 with Peters we’ll have more opportunities to trade him before the season. The only way to handle this is to regain the leverage.

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

BTW

I think we should bring in Bentley – he’s worth a try

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

By drafting a LT, we change that. If he holds out he basically will have taken a year off, then if he’s dumb enough to do it two years in a row – who the hell would want him? Look at LeCharles Bentley

You’re answering your own question here. Bentley has had serious injuries – that’s why he still doesn’t have a team. Even if Peters sat, he’d still be completely healthy. There would be a market for him – just not a TRADE market. The Bills would release him and get nothing in return. Again – not a good idea, and the Bills realize it. Again, the chances are extremely thin that the Bills play it the way you’re suggesting.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

He fully recovered from his injury

And the two staff infections are not injuries, so give me a break! I remember posting quite a few times in the past year regarding bring him in and most rumblers said that he had been out of the game too long and seems to me you were one of those…

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, I said his injuries were the reason he shouldn’t be brought in. I still think he’s a reach. But Peters wouldn’t be, because he’d still be healthy. But again, it’s not like if he sat out for two years teams would still give up even a seventh-rounder. We’d get nothing in return for him, but there WOULD be a market. If there’s even a tiny market for Bentley, then Peters would qualify as well.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

the chances are extremely thin that the Bills play it the way you’re suggesting

You have to be willing to gamble big and lose big in order to win big. The Pats franchised Cassel. That could have backfired if nobody wanted him at that price, but they had the “stones” to do it. So the question is….“Does the Bills FO have any "stones”?

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is exactly my point!!

I am certain that Peters can’t afford that kind of hit to his reputation given that he wants out. He would play in 2009 whether he likes it or not because he’s greedy but smart enough to know what the impact would be to not play.

Keeping him and drafting a guy like Andre Smith would be extremely gutsy and I think could pay-off huge for OBD

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sounds like we can't count on the Bills taking our advise :-(

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bentley is “fully recovered” from the staph infections but I have read that his knee is just not the same. It’s been a while since I read that so I don’t have a link, sorry. It takes two years to fully heal from the severity of staph infection that he had, but the infection eats away at good tissue and the structure is not the same. Supposedly he cannot move the bad knee as good. Not as flexible and limited range of movement. Given the risk, I’ve heard that his salary demands are a bit much. If he would come in and let the staff properly evaluate him, then I’d kick the tires. He wants to play in the right scenario but no one has evaluated him yet.

everything goes better with a BIG MACK

by keuka121 on Mar 31, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

What risk?

At this point he’d go to whoever would give him the minimum vet salary, I’m sure of it. Otherwise he might as well flip burgers the rest of his life. He is definitely worth taking a chance on.

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good point about how nobody wants Bentley anymore, Keysh67.

by thefourwinds on Mar 31, 2009 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is he going to forfeit that much salary?

Skippy 10 weeks over the next two years is about 60% of his salary which without looking it up in the $4 million range. I’d be surprised if he did that.

Of course, if he did it once the Bills wouldn’t let him try again I suspect.

by Pistol on Mar 31, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t be surprised if he gave up salary. As long as he qualifies for the full league year and works toward becoming a UFA, he’s got enough bank to sip daiquiris ten months per year.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

let him then

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is this is what we want?

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

As long as he gets his man boobs in front of defenders and knocks them on their ass, why not?

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

as long as the staff can keep the kid motivated I’m all for it. I hate the idea though of a rookie LT, and Kirk Chambers on the left side of our OL.

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would be completely OK with a rookie LT. Miami did fine with a rookie LT. So did Atlanta.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

And Denver.

Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.

by Fort Worth on Mar 31, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

My God Andre Smith. You are disgusting!

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Mar 31, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

He looks pretty aerodynamic.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

His stomach looks like Western Kentucky’s mascot

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Mar 31, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

You mean this guy?

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course I mean that guy!

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Mar 31, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why would he run without a shirt on?!

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Couldn’t find one that fits?

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Mar 31, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

It ain't pretty but it gets the job done!

Longest arms of all LTs and fastest feet.

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Mar 31, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still think they’ll sign Peters.

They’re talking and going back and forth at this piont. At a bare minimum that is a very good thing. So we should be optimistic in that regard. There is discussion.

He does come across selfish……well he is selfish because of holding out last year. I personally think you can get your message across differently than acting like a teenager. But the maturity and intelligence level of some of these guys makes me wonder sometimes.

I say just pay the man – even if its too much. Trade him in later years or cut the guy in a few years if you cannot afford him. The Bills are in win now mode. If they truly are in that mode, then plugging in a rookie LT in isn’t my idea of win now mode – regardless of perceived abilities of said player.

Anyway Kenny, Yellow MegaMan is only $8.95, so maybe your mom can put it on layaway and make payments for a year or two

by J2 on Mar 31, 2009 8:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Last Year's Draft

Proved to turn out some solid offensive tackles, including Jeff Otah, Jake Long, and Ryan Clady from Denver. Supposedly, Clady was playing at a Pro Bowl level before his injury. Otah had very high grade as a bookend with Jordan Gross, who is way better than Peters. Look at how Deangelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart ran all over teams last season. Before that, we had Joe Thomas at Cleveland who doesn’t give up too many sacks. I believe there are a lot more better tackles than Peters in the NFL, for him to demand top dollar.

by BuffaloWhiner on Mar 31, 2009 9:02 AM EDT reply actions  

agree

Given his performance last year, it is tough for him to say that he is a top 5 talent.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is Peters trying to force a trade?

Part of me thinks that Peters isn’t just looking for money. I think he’s looking to be traded as well.

If Peters really wanted to be a Bill a reasonable deal could be worked out. Jordan Gross just signed a contract which pretty much establishes a market value for him and they could work off of that (and you can argue he’s not at that level).

That Peters is looking to exceed that and Jake Long, with 2 years left on a contract, seems intentionally unreasonable. And why would you be intentionally unreasonable? To force your way out.
——
Regarding the original post, I’m not sure you can say Peters is immature, lazy, etc. and won’t change, but Andre Smith is the same way but just young so he’ll change. I tend to think that people that are lazy aren’t too likely to change down the road, particularly once they’ve been handed a lot of money. Smith missed the bowl game, flaked out at the combine, and then underachieved at his pro day. He’s pretty much 0-3 in his last 3 attempts to impress, when those items are among the more important things for him to do, and the only thing he has to focus on. If he can’t bother to try to impress now why is that going to change after he signs a contract? Because Langston Walker or Brad Butler yells at him to work harder? Maybe it’ll happen, I’m just not sure I’d want to bet my money on it.

Which brings up an interesting question… .what players in previous years had questions like Smith, and how did they work out? I remember Sapp falling to TB, put I think that was more a pot issue than what Smith is doing.

by Pistol on Mar 31, 2009 9:07 AM EDT reply actions  

If

Smith plays at as high a level as he did at Alabama I don’t really give a damn how lazy he is. Smith impressed in the most important area: on the field. And we know how our staff is in love with “character” supposedly… so they’ll interview him (if they already haven’t) and see what sticks. Nobody complained about Andre Smith’s work ethic at Alabama… because he produced on the field.

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

but nobody wants to micromanage a guy either. And you can’t control a grown man once he gets his money. He can do whatever he wants. So your relying on your gut instinct. He performed ON THE FIELD at BAMA….which is the overriding factor I agree. Nate Newton has some comparisons here as wel as he constantly battled with his weight. I think the key is what emotional/psychological issues is Smith dealing to cause a guy to flip sh*T and DIP OUT on the BIGGEST DAY OF HIS PRO LIFE AT THE COMBINE?

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe he’s just a small town kid who was totally overwhelmed at the combine. Stranger things have happened. If that was the case, he could fit right in up here in Buffalo. He could love it here, unlike a certain other left tackle.

by syrbillsfan on Mar 31, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Idea

We’re all quick to judge Peters’ poor sack ratio last year. Many of us realize that Dockery was a part of that. I’d love to see an analysis of the interior linemen next to the 31 players ahead of him. That would kind of put things in perspective for me.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 9:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Peters v Smith

Clearly Peters is the better player. Id say they are comparable in run blocking, but Peters would demolish Smith in Pass blocking with Peters agility. Smith is FAT. Bottom line. Now, he still produces at a HIGH LEVEL and many would say he is the TOP OT in this draft, and that was nearly a consensus 3 months ago. But his suspension for the Sugar Bowl, combined with him pulling a doozy at the Combine, definitely give him red flags. If you get a blue chip player like Smith, however at #11, that is clearly better value than Matthews.

I want Jason Peters resigned badly as I think he would be a top 2-3 OT if he spent the entire off-season at OBD, instead of reporting on day 1 of the regular season or week 10. However, if he doesn’t want to COMPROMISE at least some, then screw you. Time to move him and get fair compensation. Fair compensation is a 1st and 2 3rds. Id also take a 2nd and 2 3rds, or defer the 1st round pick to 2010 and take a 3rd and a 5th this year. Draft day trades like this would have to be orchestrated WAY b4 the draft. So if Smith pops up at #11, the Bills call Philly or whoever and say DEAL or NO DEAL?

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Another idea

Trade peters to Philly for a 2nd round and a 4th round. We can get talent to fill holes with at least 2 picks for Peters. Draft Smith or Oher. 2nd round get a OG and DE then in the 3rd and 4th get the TE and OLB’s Then the 5th – 7th draft guys who can provide depth at some of the positions we need – FB, SS, FS, and OL. I also like the idea of Nic Harris – Oklahoma as a free agent pick up as depth at OLB any thoughts.

Fat, Drunk, & Stupid is No way to go through life.

by Deadpool71 on Mar 31, 2009 9:34 AM EDT reply actions  

I voted for Peters.

I think he is a better player than Smith. He may not be the better value and he may be really irritating me but he is better than Smith. A bird in hand is worth two in the bush. We know what we get from Peters.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Mar 31, 2009 9:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Depends on the bush.

Sorry Joe, didn’t mean to step on your toes there.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

No problem sireric......I never thought the trade Peters bandwagon

would get so crowded.

Matt – The bird in your hand is biting off chunks of flesh!!!!! It is time to teach it some manners or let it go.

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I thought that after his hold out last year, he would have signed a new deal by now, a deal that was in line with his talents. Now that he is planning another hold out, and demanding to be the top paid OT in football, (which he isn’t even close to being) I have done a 180 (that is when you turn around and go the other way Joe, not a 360) and I would be very willing to take a second rounder just to dump this giant headache and his jack%^* agent.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

So...I have one MRW to me credit :-)

I would not take a 2nd, I still think we need to get fair value.

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that is fair value.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again, I will ask........How did we get from, to valuable to trade at great LT to an LT worth only a 2nd rounder?

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that happened when it became apparent that he wouldn’t budge from his desire to be the highest paid lineman in the NFL. Although I still wouldn’t trade him for anything else than a first rounder.

by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 31, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

To me his value declines rapidly, when, coming off of his 2008 performance, he is willing to basically sit out the whole year until he become the highest paid OT in the league. A distinction that he does not deserve.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

But his value across the league should not drop because the Bills are not willing to pay him,

unless the rest of the league agrees he is not a top LT, in which case Peters needs to learn that lesson.

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

in which case Peters needs to learn that lesson.

And in the mean time, while Peters is learning his lesson, the Bills are without a LT. Would it not be better to simply dump Peters now, and draft his replacement and move on?

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

At this point (and I hate to say it) yes it would be easier to dump him

Let’s see if we can’t pry a 1st rounder from the Eagles for him, draft Oher at 11 and draft Pettigrew at 21.

by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 31, 2009 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is my line of thinking

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

But, you said you would take a 2nd rounder for Peters

Pick #21 is in the 1st round. The path of least resistance is not always the best one to take. If we want value for Peters, we have to at least look like we are willing to play hard ball. I’m sorry, you know I don’t like Peters, but I would rather take the chance of him sitting this season than give him away for peanuts.

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m sorry, you know I don’t like Peters, but I would rather take the chance of him sitting this season than give him away for peanuts.

First: a second-round pick is not peanuts, Joe.

Second: I’d be willing to bet that if the Bills were offered a first-round pick OR a second and a fourth, they’d take the latter deal.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

For a guy who is worth being paid like a top 5 LT in his prime

yeah, it is!!!! Now, if he is not worth it, then he needs to see that NOBODY in the NFL thinks he is worth that. The Bills have not even let him shop himself yet, and you guys want to give him away!!!!! It must be me……… I can’t for the life of me understand why Peters was such a great player when we thought we could resign him, and now that we can’t he has so much less value to a league that regards LTs as the second most important position in the game.

What is the points difference between pick #21 and Phillies 2nd and 4th?

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

It must be me………

It is, and you should be used to that by now.

I get what you are saying and I’m not saying that the Bills should have traded him already. I am willing to wait till draft day. If his situation isn’t resolved by then, the Bills have to deal him so that they can draft his replacement.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Mar 31, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Bills have not even let him shop himself yet, and you guys want to give him away!

Who here wants to “give him away”? If Philly offers 21 and 28, I’m not going to say “nah, don’t take that deal, the poor Eagles are suckers.”

I can’t for the life of me understand why Peters was such a great player when we thought we could resign him, and now that we can’t he has so much less value to a league that regards LTs as the second most important position in the game.

Nobody is saying that Peters isn’t a potentially great player. You seem to be meshing contract value and trade compensation as equal entities, but they’re not. Randy Moss was traded for a fourth round pick. More often than not, unless you’re trading a quarterback, you’re not going to get what one might perceive as “fair value” contractually in return. I think you’re grossly overestimating Peters’ compensation worth, and grossly underestimating the value of draft picks to NFL teams, particularly in the month of April.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Peters’ behavior is what this is about, not his talent. His talent indicates regardless of how much we may need him, you don’t give him the contract he desires. I thought the Bills offer was 9-10 mil per year (or that’s just a figment of my imagination). That seems more than fair. Good teams don’t give ridiculous contracts to “elite in their own mind” players. If we ever want to be a good team, we shouldn’t start.

by syrbillsfan on Mar 31, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

"elite in their own mind" players

Great one! Reminds me of that line from Good Morning, Vietnam: “In my heart, I know I’m funny.”

by thefourwinds on Mar 31, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe he will have that on his tombstone

Here lies Jason Peters….elite LT in his own mind.

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here lies Jason Peters….he missed so much training camp we need two burial plots

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Apr 1, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here lies Jason Peters......feel free to "releave" yourself.

"In 1930, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, in an effort to alleviate the effects of the... Anyone? Anyone? ...the Great Depression, passed the... Anyone? Anyone? The tariff bill? The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act? Which, anyone? Raised or lowered? ...raised tariffs, in an effort to collect more revenue for the federal government. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression. Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says that at this point on the revenue curve, you will get exactly the same amount of revenue as at this point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice President Bush called this in 1980? Anyone? Something-d-o-o economics. "Voodoo" economics." - Ben Stein

by Joe P. on Apr 1, 2009 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Funny!

Walter Jones in Seattle was a pro bowler for 5 years before he got his big money deal. My take on Peters is that he’s been whining about not being paid what he’s worth since we surprised him with that contract extension. I think he might have a tinge of remorse about signing that.

by syrbillsfan on Apr 2, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good teams don’t give ridiculous contracts to "elite in their own mind" players

If a player is truly elite and knows he is and wants to be on a good team, then he should also be a team player. Prime examples are Dwight Freeney and Bob Sanders who both signed lesser contracts then they would have gotten with other teams, in order to stay with the Colts.

To me that is the difference between great players and Elite players. A great player whille come in, do his job and get paid (hello Albert Heinsworth), an elite player wel come in do his job, and also sacrifice in order for his team to win (Freeney and Sanders). Great players are expendable in the end, elite players re not. To me Peters’s behavior is just proving that he is a great, and not elite player.

Trade Him.

by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 31, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

The question I haven't seen answered.

Would Peters take less money to play for a playoff team? If so, the ability to trade him is made much easier. I don’t see the Eagles giving up a first rounder for him if they have to pay him 12 mil, but if they can have him for 10, they might just do it. Otherwise they could just trade both of their firsts and move up to get who they want.

by BillsNYC on Mar 31, 2009 9:40 AM EDT reply actions  

that's the issue

I don’t think Peters will take less $ to go to a playoff team….he simply wants to get paid. If I had to guess, I think Peters and his agent will realize, the best thing he can do is compromise with the BIlls and sign a fair deal. This all needs to be resolved by the time the DRAFT finishes though or the leverage for the Bills will be so little they’ll have to jeopardize their team’s chances with a Peters holdout

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

If his goal is money, and not winning, then I don’t think he’s worth the 12+ price tag. If he was a clear top 3 tackle with motivation to be the best I’d say pay him, but he’s not and in my opinion not worth the headache. We aren’t one player away from the playoffs, the money can be spent more wisely elsewhere.

by BillsNYC on Mar 31, 2009 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Leverage is only gone for this year after the draft

The key to getting something done prior to the draft is that if you’re going to end up trading Peters you get picks that you can add to your team this year.

If you trade him after the draft you’re going to wait another year to get those picks.

However, I don’t think the Bills lose much leverage if they were to make a trade a year from today. They still would have him under contract and the potential to use the franchise tag on him. If teams want him they’ll still have to give something up. The only significant risk is a major injury.

So from May 2009 to March 2010 I don’t think there’s much difference in trading leverage for the Bills.

by Pistol on Mar 31, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

We also see that he is more worried about the money than producing on the field or the team. Smith I believe would be able to come in and start with no BS. That is what we want. If peters is all about the money let him go to get some and not cause us headache.

Fat, Drunk, & Stupid is No way to go through life.

by Deadpool71 on Mar 31, 2009 9:41 AM EDT reply actions  

The

latest mock drafts I’ve seen all three of the top tackles are taken before we get a crack at them, now who do we get to repace Peters?

Bills Fan in PA

by BILLS on Mar 31, 2009 9:41 AM EDT reply actions  

How many games did the team WIN because of Jason Peters?

Is a LT really as important as the world thinks they are? Didn’t Mike Gandy make a rather old QB look great? Right, it wasn’t he alone that made it happen. As soon as someone shows Peters that he’s not the most important guy on the team, leverage might swing back their way.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 9:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Didn’t Mike Gandy make a rather old QB look great?

No, not even close. Gandy almost got him killed on numerous occasions. They won in spite of Gandy and his pathetic play.

~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"

by Kurupt on Mar 31, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

My main point was that Gandy didn’t influence the team in one way or the other. He wasn’t a cornerstone and they didn’t need him to be. Warner is smart (usually) and honestly, outside of that Jets game, I didn’t see any really pathetic play from either Warner or Gandy.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I tend to agree with you Afghan Twilight. I think the LT position (QB blindside) is massively overstated. If you have a weakness on the O-line, it will be exploited, causing plays to blow up in the backfield, leading to turnovers, injuries, etc.

by thefourwinds on Mar 31, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like a doormat at the center position

Or a talented left guard who keeps mailing it in.

by syrbillsfan on Apr 2, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's the latest on

Peters from Florio over pft

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 9:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, that’s just yanked from this morning’s News.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Mar 31, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

from that

it sounds like the Bills are pretty adamant about trying to negotiate a new deal. But if in 2 weeks they realize it ain’t going to happen, then it’s time to move him, as the draft is only a mere 25 days away

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Mar 31, 2009 9:50 AM EDT reply actions  

JP Must go

You cant sign a contract for 5 years, then decide halfway through you are not making enough. You either sign for security (5 years), or negotiate for lesser term and then challenge FA. You cant have it both ways Jason. Hes a cankerous cancer motivated by ‘show me the money’.

"That's why you play the game. To go to the ProBowl." -#71

.... I'm pretty sure that's not why, but OK.

by esto on Mar 31, 2009 9:59 AM EDT reply actions  

ForeignArrow

Well done!!! Good post. I agree with you 100%. I voted for Peters starting on opening day, but I wish you would have given us a few more choices in your poll. If we already know Peters will not be there on opening day, than it is not a very realistic option.

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end". - R. J. Wiedemann. Lt.Col. USMC Ret.

by Joe P. on Mar 31, 2009 10:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Good post FA

If we end up needing a new LT in the draft, my guess is that we get Oher. Andre Smith is prognoisticated to go before the #11 pick by most. Kiper has him going #2 to the Rams. If he falls to us it would be a minor miracle somewhat like McKelvin last year.
I’d also agree with Brian that we would be ok with a rookie LT. The top 4 are all good.

everything goes better with a BIG MACK

by keuka121 on Mar 31, 2009 11:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Heh

I just noticed this was on the front page. Boomshockalocka.

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

by ForeignArrow on Mar 31, 2009 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Suprising Poll Results

I simply don’t understand why most Bills fans would rather start a rookie left tackle rather than a pro-bowl left tackle. Talent-wise, it makes absolutely no sense.

“Distraction in the locker room” is the biggest load of crap. You need guys who are excellent football players talent wise to win in this leauge. What is so ridiculous about paying up for Jason Peters? He’s a franchise left tackle!

by buffaloboy90 on Mar 31, 2009 1:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Talent-wise, it’s at least a push Experience-wise, Peters wins. I just don’t know where Peters got it in his head that 1.5 pro bowls does an elite tackle make. Especially with the .5 pro bowl coming in a bad year. Is a franchise left tackle who gives up 11 sacks in less than a whole season (his fault or not) really worth top dollar?

by syrbillsfan on Mar 31, 2009 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

wonderlic

I seem to remember Peters’ wonderlic score in the single digits..not sure if that is a good thing or bad thing when you are trying to negotiate with him, but we will probably need to draw him a map when we ship his butt out of town

by sestak on Mar 31, 2009 2:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I had a similar thought. His wonderlic score was 12, pretty pitiful. So perhaps he doesn’t have the intelligence to comprehend the reality of the situation. Compound that with the seemingly unreasonable attitude of Eugene Parker and you have the muddled mess that we have now. Jason Peters could care less about the team and those who helped mold him into the player he is today.

everything goes better with a BIG MACK

by keuka121 on Mar 31, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Usually

OL players have the highest Wonderlic scores.

"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 31, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

unless their morons of course ;)

I usually give people the benefit of the doubt – but I usually end up on the wrong end of that deal.

As that old saying says – it is better to be a pessimist and be happily surprised than a optimist and always be disappointed.

wasn’t that Ben Franklin?

Anyway Kenny, Yellow MegaMan is only $8.95, so maybe your mom can put it on layaway and make payments for a year or two

by J2 on Mar 31, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

How can optimists be disappointed?

If you’re an optimist you can look on the bright side of it, Ben. Man no wonder that guy is dead… :-)

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Mar 31, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

hahah never thought of it that way. but Ben was the man MRW. Probably my favorite historical figure.

Anyway Kenny, Yellow MegaMan is only $8.95, so maybe your mom can put it on layaway and make payments for a year or two

by J2 on Apr 1, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I prefer Jefferson.

or John Adams. Ben Franklin was too….. He was all flash and no substance IMO.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Apr 1, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dude....BF invented bifocals, among other things!

"In 1930, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, in an effort to alleviate the effects of the... Anyone? Anyone? ...the Great Depression, passed the... Anyone? Anyone? The tariff bill? The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act? Which, anyone? Raised or lowered? ...raised tariffs, in an effort to collect more revenue for the federal government. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression. Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says that at this point on the revenue curve, you will get exactly the same amount of revenue as at this point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice President Bush called this in 1980? Anyone? Something-d-o-o economics. "Voodoo" economics." - Ben Stein

by Joe P. on Apr 1, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

He’s also on the C-Note. get with it MRW!!!!

That is one long freakin’ sig Joe. Is that from Ferris Buellers day off?

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Apr 1, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

yep..... I was applying the Laffer Curve to the Peters situation

In this case, I thought I would call it “Dough Boy” economics !

"In 1930, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, in an effort to alleviate the effects of the... Anyone? Anyone? ...the Great Depression, passed the... Anyone? Anyone? The tariff bill? The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act? Which, anyone? Raised or lowered? ...raised tariffs, in an effort to collect more revenue for the federal government. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression. Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says that at this point on the revenue curve, you will get exactly the same amount of revenue as at this point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice President Bush called this in 1980? Anyone? Something-d-o-o economics. "Voodoo" economics." - Ben Stein

by Joe P. on Apr 1, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know he's on the CNote.

I am a teacher man!!! I only carry hundreds.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Apr 1, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

When I'm old enough to need them I'll let you know.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Apr 1, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

well he also

developed a flexible urinary catheter that appears to have been the first one produced in America. So you will have that to thank him for as well :-)

"In 1930, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, in an effort to alleviate the effects of the... Anyone? Anyone? ...the Great Depression, passed the... Anyone? Anyone? The tariff bill? The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act? Which, anyone? Raised or lowered? ...raised tariffs, in an effort to collect more revenue for the federal government. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression. Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says that at this point on the revenue curve, you will get exactly the same amount of revenue as at this point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice President Bush called this in 1980? Anyone? Something-d-o-o economics. "Voodoo" economics." - Ben Stein

by Joe P. on Apr 1, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Finesse Offensive Tackles

Recent FanPosts

Small
My Updated 2012 Bills Mock Draft - with Trade Down
Thumb-10488_small
The Trade Fred Jackson Thread
Truth1_small
What's the Diggity? Part 2
Small
State of the 53Man roster +$$$
Small
RG III - What If??
Small
Morning Joe! (Non-Political) Liberal vs. Conservative
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
The 2011 Buffalo Bills' Statistical Failures
Small
Bills needs
Small
Fixing The Bills' Pass Rush Without Breaking The Bank
Small
Stanford Routt in Today....got this feeling

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Lead Editors

Img_20110806_213313_small Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Senior Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Contributing Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Site Moderators

211_talking_proud_1_small krytime

Santa_bill_small poz

Billsdinosaurrider_small WABillsfan

Avatar31985_4_small silverstreak3k

3850_small JPH