Analyzing the NFL Draft QB trade market, post-Cutler
Jay Cutler has been traded from the Denver Broncos to the Chicago Bears. It's a glorious day in Chicago, while Denver's feelings are a bit more mixed. And, as usually happens when a trade of this magnitude goes down, our very own Buffalo Bills are affected.
Now that Cutler's situation has been resolved, the focus on quarterbacks will turn to rookies - and, far more significantly for the Bills, which teams will jockey for this year's three hot quarterback prospects. The Bills, holders of the eleventh overall selection, find themselves directly in the middle of eight teams that may consider making a move for either Georgia's Matthew Stafford, USC's Mark Sanchez or Kansas State's Josh Freeman.
What follows is a breakdown of the possibilities. And possibilities there are; if the Bills are interested in trading down in this year's pecking order, they very well could end up with several scenarios to capitalize on. Then again, events could unfold which afford the Bills no opportunity to move down whatsoever (at least in terms of teams trading up for a quarterback).
#1 overall: Detroit Lions
Obviously, the Detroit Lions are the holders of the top overall pick in the draft. Just as obviously, as they haven't won an NFL regular season game since the calendar read 2007, they need a franchise quarterback at the center of their rebuilding effort. For months, mock drafters everywhere have penciled in Stafford as Detroit's top overall selection - and while that still remains a strong possibility, it's certainly not a given.
Detroit has options here, including an offensive tackle or linebacker Aaron Curry. Still, my money is on the team biting the bullet and drafting Stafford, if only because I'm hopeful that the Lions are one of the teams potentially interested in trading for Jason Peters (if they go OT here, that's out of the question).
#4 overall: Seattle Seahawks
Like the Lions, there's a chance that Seattle takes a quarterback where they currently sit. Matt Hasselbeck has taken a beating in recent seasons, and he's no spring chicken. The theory is that Seattle will look hard at drafting the long-term replacement to Hasselbeck, and both Stafford and Sanchez have been mentioned as possibilities. Seahawks fans seem to favor Stafford, but it's worth noting, even if only for the purposes of smokescreen speculation, that the Seahawks sent a large contingent to USC's Pro Day.
#8 overall: Jacksonville Jaguars
This is where things get interesting - and they'll only be interesting if either the Lions or the Seahawks pass on a quarterback where they currently sit. The Jaguars recently wined and dined Sanchez, even though they've already committed serious dollars to current starter David Garrard. Garrard is 31 years old, but while drafting a successor does make some sense, I smell the team buttering up Sanchez to drum up trade interest. With San Francisco at 10 and Denver at 12, Jacksonville's in a good spot for a team to leap-frog two teams potentially interested in quarterbacks. There's an outside shot they take a quarterback, but I think they're eager to move down, and bought Sanchez a dinner to prove it.
#10 overall: San Francisco 49ers
San Francisco, though they seem to like Shaun Hill, have long been linked to Sanchez, the local product in those parts. You have to believe that the strong-armed Stafford piques their interest as well. If either are available, San Francisco would have a hard time passing on them, though Niners fans seem reluctant at the idea of a first-round quarterback. The 49ers are the highest team in the pecking order that lower teams will be looking to leap-frog; hence Jacksonville's wining and dining.
#11 overall: Buffalo Bills
Here sit our beloved Buffalo Bills, with a two-time Pro Bowl left tackle they'll probably trade and plenty of good reasons for moving down in the draft to stock-pile picks. Everything below this point is particularly interesting to us.
#12 overall: Denver Broncos
"The Team That Traded Cutler" will undoubtedly consider Sanchez here if available. Don't forget that new Broncos head coach Josh McDaniels prefers system quarterbacks - he doesn't necessarily look for oodles of talent as opposed to intelligence and accuracy. Sanchez will undoubtedly be the top quarterback on their board. That said, there's also a strong chance that the Broncos fortify their defense early and taking a quarterback to develop in the mid-to-late rounds, which is exactly how McDaniels developed star pupil Matt Cassel in the first place.
#17 overall: New York Jets
If there's one team in the NFL more desperate for a quarterback than Detroit at this point, it's the Jets. They're the team that will look to move up if either Stafford or Sanchez slides. The wild card is Freeman; he could very well still be available at 17. The Jets reportedly like Freeman (Jets fans don't) and Sanchez (Jets fans don't), so you have to imagine they like Stafford as well. The Jets are desperate, but they've also got options. They probably will NOT trade with the Bills, as intra-division trades are a rarity on draft day.
#18 overall: Denver Broncos
See above. This pick was acquired from Chicago in the Cutler trade.
#19 overall: Tampa Bay Buccaneers
The Bucs, another team in re-building mode, are in the unenviable position of letting Luke McCown and Josh Johnson duke it out for the starting QB role in a quarterback competition not quite for the ages. Yeah... they'll consider drafting a quarterback. The hot name is Freeman here, as he spent time with coach Raheem Morris while Morris was at Kansas State. Sanchez is a possibility as well. Moving up might be difficult for the Bucs, however, as the team traded its second-round pick this year for TE Kellen Winslow.
#20 overall: Detroit Lions
With this pick as well as the always-coveted #33 pick, the Lions are in a good position to make a move up if they pass on a quarterback with the top pick (and haven't dealt either of these selections to the Bills for Peters... come on, Mayhew, you know you want that to happen). If they want to move up past the Bucs and Jets of the world to get a quarterback, they have ammo. The Bills are certainly a contender here, considering Denver's placement, though the Lions could also gamble, let Denver pass on a quarterback at 12 and then target a trade with someone just above the Jets.
#22 overall: Minnesota Vikings
The Vikings are a curiosity to me - they routinely ignore the quarterback position early in the draft, and it hampers them every single year. They made a trade for Sage Rosenfels, who will battle with Tarvaris Jackson for the starting job - but with Aaron Rodgers and now Cutler in the NFC North, the Vikings could be looking at trouble without consistent quarterback play. At the very least, they need a long-term starter - so while precedent dictates the Vikings won't be in the QB market unless one of the three names slide all the way to pick 22, it's hard to leave them off this list.
***
Who likes chess? This is one giantic chess match, and the Bills very well could end up being part of another team's strategy. Feel free to use us, NFL franchises. We want your draft picks. Let the speculation begin!
0 recs |
72 comments
|
Comments
Amazing
that post on the Bears blog only has 38 comments. Brian, this place is a hot spot, isn’t it?
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Apr 3, 2009 11:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, they had 527 on their Cutler thread yesterday. Different time zone. They’re just as hot as we are.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Let's do the time warp again!"
Oh yes, the time zone issue is a big factor.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Apr 3, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hear
that the VIkings really do love Freeman, but there’s no way they come up to #11 to get him. My sources tell me Brad Childress is a very stubborn man about QB’s and he will go to bat in 2009 with Sage and T Jack. He thinks he is so smart and good at managing QB’s that he doesn’t need elite talent. Owner Ziggy Wilf gave the OK to go after Jay Cutler, but it was Childress who said he didn’t want Cutler despite many in the Vikings organization who thought otherwise. They love Freeman, but unless he’s still available in the late teens, don’t expect the ViQueens to move anywhere as giving up more draft picks for a team full of aging veteran players would really set the franchise back
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
by MARVelous on Apr 3, 2009 11:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Few thoughts....
I would love the Bills to, well…, screw over the Jets if they want to trade up to us and get ahead of Denver for a QB. Either that or demand something ridiculous – good position for us to be in.
I could definately see Detriot not taking a QB at 1 because of $$ (just in general, not related to salary cap) and trying to either move back up in the first with some compensation. I also don’t expect them to take Cushing because of the steriod issues (did you see the pics in the other post, geez thats obvious) I could definately see us on their lsit of potential suitors. good deal
If the top QB’s fall a little – our pick becomes very valuable – good deal for us. We might end up with a lot more than we thought.
Anyway Kenny, Yellow MegaMan is only $8.95, so maybe your mom can put it on layaway and make payments for a year or two
by J2 on Apr 3, 2009 11:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Detroit takes Aaron Curry....
and then deals with the Bills to get any one of the three. I like the scenario!!!
by Byrdeputt on Apr 3, 2009 11:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Or, they take Stafford, and then deal with the Bills to get Peters.
Detroit’s our top potential trade partner right now.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brian, when did you go from “it’s quite possible Peters gets traded” to “trade him now – pretty please with sprinkles on top?”
I don’t think I saw anything in other posts that revealed how adamant you’ve become.
The captial of Youboty is Youboty.
by thatguy34 on Apr 3, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve become adamant?
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’ve become very hopeful
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Apr 3, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, I still hope that Peters comes to his senses and lowers his demands. I want him here.
I just happen to believe strongly that Detroit is our most likely suitor. Didn’t mean to insinuate otherwise.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Detroit and drum roll please……Washington are the most likely suitors.
I would be ecstatic if we could get pick 20 and their 3rd rounder….I don’t want to trade Peters, but that’d be good value considering where the 3rd rounder is.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Apr 3, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Washington? Chris Samuels? Albert Haynesworth?
I can see them breaking the bank for a QB (which they tried to do with Cutler, allegedly), but not a LT.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t they need a Tackle? I see them being involved in a lot of Andre Smith at #13 picks…
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Apr 3, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They still have Samuels and Janson. I think they’d take an OT if they were there, but that doesn’t mean they’d fork out huge wads of cash to Peters. I don’t consider them a contender at all.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what they do
The Redskins don’t seem to be the team that shows restraint. If they want Peters they won’t let money be an issue.
by Pistol on Apr 3, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never said they would. I just don’t think they’ll want Peters.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brian, have you mentioned that you are a spelling freak (or something like that)?
I think his name is spelled Jansen. :)
By the way, doesn’t Jansen sustain a season-ending injury almost every year?
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on Apr 3, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he does have serious injury concerns.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Apr 3, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
…if only because I’m hopeful that the Lions are one of the teams potentially interested in trading for Jason Peters…
…with a two-time Pro Bowl left tackle they’ll probably trade…
…and haven’t dealt either of these selections to the Bills for Peters… come on, Mayhew, you know you want that to happen…
Maybe not adamant, but you certainly seem more vocal now, in terms of the liklihood of a trade and your wanting of it to happen.
The captial of Youboty is Youboty.
by thatguy34 on Apr 3, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course, maybe that’s not the case and I’m just poor at reading comprehension.
The captial of Youboty is Youboty.
by thatguy34 on Apr 3, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, again, that’s just me thinking that Detroit is the best spot to make a deal. I’m saying that if there’s a team to deal with, they’re it. They’ve got ideal picks in 20 and 33, and 65 isn’t too shabby either.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Green Bay is in the best position to trade down. Teams will be looking to get ahead of SF to ensure a QB is still available to them. If the Jets want to trade up, they’ll be on the phones with GB, no doubt.
I don’t see it effecting the Bills that much unless the teams ahead of them have no desire to trade down. Hopefully, they’re set on drafting certain players and the Bills will have a very desirable pick, but I’m not counting on it.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Apr 3, 2009 11:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Trade peters to GB for Aaron Kampman and a swap of Rd 1 picks
We then get to broker # 9 as the QB spot! Possibly to Detroit (if they took Jason Smith at 1) for picks 20 and 33. Might have to throw in our 4th to make it work but…
We then don’t have to draft a true 4-3 Pro Bowl end who plays LDE
by freddyjj on Apr 3, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt that the Bills will have much interest in Kampman.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Didn’t we just pick up the former defensive coordinator from Green Bay as our D-line coach?
by WhyBillsWhy on Apr 3, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, and that’s the only really good point to make in speculating.
I just don’t see this one happening.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And why would we trade a great, young LT who’s best years are ahead of him, for an ageing DE who’s best years are behind him. To me, even if we do trade first rounders, GB gets by far the better deal.
by CanadianBillsFan on Apr 4, 2009 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
Freeman is who a lot of teams want to get though, so I do think 11 is good no matter what. I don’t see more than Stafford and Sanchez going top 10, and I doubt both will go without a trade up to 8-11 to get a Sanchez or Stafford in front of Denver. I think Buffalo is in a prime position….
As we get into more draft talk, the one common thing you hear from NFL sources, is that this draft if full of good players, but there isn’t a position of elite talent. Last year we grabbed the top CB and this year the only top position we could grab at #11 is Pettigrew. So if a team needs badly one of the top 3 QB’s, Buffalo is a natural option.
I’d love to acquire an extra pick so we could land: Pettigrew, Unger and Chip Vaughn.
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
by MARVelous on Apr 3, 2009 11:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Having a guy named Chip on your team should be good karma. I’d like that too, assuming we had an extra pick or two in order to acquire him….
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Apr 3, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then we could draft RB Dale Morris and officially change our team name to the “Buffalo Rescue Rangers”.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really hope you just went to check for any draft prospects named Dale. If you know who the 106th rated RB is for this draft, you need help!
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Apr 3, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is there a guy named Monterey Jack, or Gadget?
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Apr 3, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes and Yes
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Apr 3, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha, no, I definitely Googled “2009 NFL Draft prospect Dale”
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chip and Dale imply other things too, unfortunately.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Apr 3, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chip and Dale.
Chippendales.
Chris Farley.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Top 5 SNL skits of all time.
The captial of Youboty is Youboty.
by thatguy34 on Apr 3, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
See, I didn’t even recall it being spelled that way. =)
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Apr 3, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you haven't seen it... it's worth the 3 minutes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RajNvJ3bCU
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Apr 4, 2009 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too bad Chip + Dale don't play DE or LB where we could use them both at the same time
Chip & Dale in on the sack!
by syrbillsfan on Apr 3, 2009 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Err, uh. Oops!
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Apr 3, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chip Vaughn
is officially “my boy” in the 2009 draft class. And knowing Dick jauron’s fascination with the defensive backfield, I’m hoping if he does pull the trigger on a “surprise” pick in round 2 or 3, that Chip Vaughn is the guy
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
by MARVelous on Apr 3, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Denver trades up
I think if anyone trades up it would be Denver moving from 12 to 8 to get Sanchez. That makes Freeman more valuable, but without Denver sitting at 12 needing a QB anyomore, it would kill a trade up to 11. The next trade would be if someone wanted to leapfrog the Jets at 17 for him.
by south123 on Apr 3, 2009 12:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Attempting to optimize x number of scenarios,
any of which could change or be added to with other changes, all the way up to and through draft day. Enjoy.
All of this discussion could so easily turn out to be moot. I’m willing to wait until closer to draft day when the scenarios are narrowed down a bit, and then discuss and focus on some options.
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on Apr 3, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like you just don’t want your brain to fry.
Seriously, where’s the harm in a little speculation on a Friday afternoon? :)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally, I’m looking forward to someone getting bored and firing off a mock draft that has one of these scenarios played out. I’m kinda curious what we’d end up with.
Brian, I hate to be that guy- but the Bills are affected by the trade, not effected…I’m sorry, I’m a complete grammar whore.
Penn Staters belong at Penn State. The problem with a lot of kids is they just don’t know they are Penn Staters yet.
Noli nothis permittere te terere.
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Apr 3, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m sorry, I’m a complete grammar whore.
So am I. The “affect/effect” thing is one I’ve struggled with since I was practically a fetus.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The way I always remember it- an affect causes an effect.
Penn Staters belong at Penn State. The problem with a lot of kids is they just don’t know they are Penn Staters yet.
Noli nothis permittere te terere.
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Apr 3, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I always screw up then and than. among other things.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Apr 3, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The hyphen is a fun one for many people. Funny is the part that they don’t know it’s being use correctly or incorrectly most time.
"Buffalo Bills Football 2009 (sponsored by Labatt): A Future as Uncertain as the Beer You’re Drinking"
"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Apr 3, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The "affect/effect" thing is one I’ve struggled with since I was practically a fetus.
always screw up then and than. among other things.
Where’s that grade school teacher of ours when we need him?
by CanadianBillsFan on Apr 4, 2009 2:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have just as difficult a time as Brian with this one.
I like grammar and spelling but music, math, and history are my strong subjects.
I don’t even understand what K-Gun wrote about affects causing effects…..
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Apr 4, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Affect is a verb, effect is a noun- so if you’re affected by something, you feel its effect. It’s nonsensical, but it helps?
Penn Staters belong at Penn State. The problem with a lot of kids is they just don’t know they are Penn Staters yet.
Noli nothis permittere te terere.
by TheK-GunNeedsReloaded on Apr 4, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm. Well when you put it that way, I just feel dumb for not understanding it for so long. :)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 4, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t worry, I still don’t understand it.
by CanadianBillsFan on Apr 4, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me take a crack at it
Jason Peters’ dumb a$$ contract demands have affected his popularity with the fan base.
The effect of Jason Peters’ dumb a$$ contract demands is a decrease in his popularity with the fan base.
How’s that?
How important does a person have to be before they are considered assassinated instead of just murdered?
by Joe P. on Apr 4, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you’re saying that Peters’ actions have affected his popularity, then I agree.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 4, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was the effect I was hoping for.
How important does a person have to be before they are considered assassinated instead of just murdered?
by Joe P. on Apr 4, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All you needed to say was
All you needed to say was “Affect is a verb, effect is a noun”. I get it!
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Apr 5, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I, too, struggle with the difference between those particular words.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Apr 4, 2009 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No harm at all :)
I am just conserving my time and energy for when it matters more (as if fan blogging impacts what actually happens anyway).
Great plays don't make great players; great players make great plays.
by Fort Worth on Apr 3, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't let my wife read that.
as if fan blogging impacts what actually happens anyway).
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Apr 4, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there is zero harm
I get burned out 2 weeks prior to the draft when there is nothing going on……I get “mock drafted” out…..but this year with Jason Peters and Tony Scheffler looking to get moved, it will be an extraordinarily interesting draft
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
by MARVelous on Apr 3, 2009 12:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
mike vick
Sign # 7 once he is freed, simply as an insurance policy to our promising, albeit fragile quarterback.
by jzoom45 on Apr 3, 2009 6:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If you’re signing Michael Freaking Vick as an insurance policy… well, you might as well move to Toronto.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Apr 3, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
come on the guy is a playmaker. he has never been a great qb, but would be a better option than ryan fitzpatrick. we put him in ONLY if edwards is hurt.
by jzoom45 on Apr 3, 2009 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, Vick is definitely a reliable guy.
~K
"I’m Kurupt with Buffalo Rumblings. I am worth hundreds!"
by Kurupt on Apr 4, 2009 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
The only reason i’d sign Vick is for him to deliver popcorn on the feild to TO after he catches a touchdown. And even then I wouldn’t expect that job to be done right, he’d run up the field as soon as he’d see a maskot.
by CanadianBillsFan on Apr 4, 2009 2:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We are in a good, not great position to trade out for QB hungry teams.
Green Bay or Jacksonville are the places I would trade to if I wanted a QB. That gets me ahead of San Fran. If he lasts to 11, our phone should be ringing. I just don’t know if it happens. One can hope. :-)
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Apr 4, 2009 8:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















