Around the AFC East, Week 4: New York Jets
If there is one NFL decision-maker who best compares to Buffalo Bills COO/GM Russ Brandon, it's Mike Tannenbaum of the New York Jets. A (sports) lawyer by trade - but also possessor of a degree in accounting and a minor in sports management - Tannenbaum has spent the past three seasons as the Jets' GM, taking over for Terry Bradway after the 2005 season.
In those three years, the Jets have experienced successes - their '06 playoff berth behind Eric Mangini and Chad Pennington would be the high point - but they've also had utter failures, including a 4-12 2007 season and a 1-4 finish to 2008 that saw the Jets squander the lead in the AFC East. Perhaps Tannenbaum's biggest failure as a GM to this point has been his acquisition of QB Brett Favre, who brought plenty of excitement, but very little payoff in his one season in New York. (To be fair, he's also made some excellent moves, including the trade that landed dominant NT Kris Jenkins.)
What do Jets fans think of Tannenbaum? Well, I can only ask one at a time. I'll start with John B of Gang Green Nation.
What are your thoughts on Tannenbaum? He's one of the youngest GMs in the league, and he's been on the job for three years - that's enough of a sample size to make a pretty good judgment. Is he the guy to steer the Jets back into the annual post-season playoff race, or are you concerned about some of the decisions he's made in his three years?
John B: On the whole, I think Tannenbaum has been excellent. There is significantly more talent on the roster now than when he arrived on the job. Of his seven picks in the opening two rounds of the Draft from 2006 to 2008, five of them look like cornerstone players (Ferguson, Mangold, Revis, Harris, and Keller). Add 2006 fourth-rounder Leon Washington, and you have six.
He has also aggressively moved to add key veteran pieces. He closed the deal on Bart Scott, Jim Leonhard, Lito Sheppard, Alan Faneca, Damien Woody, Calvin Pace, Kris Jenkins, Thomas Jones, and Tony Richardson since taking over as GM. When he targets a player, he very rarely misses his man. This aggression has also displayed itself in the Draft. Of the players I mentioned, he traded up for Revis, Harris, and Keller (not to mention Mark Sanchez). Add Brett Favre into the mix as well. Regardless of how it turned out, Tannenbaum realized his team had a weakness at quarterback ten months ago and landed a Hall of Famer coming off a great season at a reasonable price.
You see a lot of baseball general managers with unconventional backgrounds these days. That is not so much the case in football. Tannenbaum is an exception. He is a lawyer by trade; Bill Parcells brought him aboard to run the salary cap. Not being a talent evaluator, he has had to depend on his scouting department. He has surrounded himself with good people, evaluated the evidence, and acted decisively time and again to land quality players. Tannenbaum also understands how to manipulate the cap so well that his bold moves have not mortgaged the team's future even if there is a salary cap beyond this season. I think he has built a great foundation with the players I mentioned.
Of course, the move that will ultimately define his tenure was the Mark Sanchez trade. The jury will remain out for a few years on that one.
***
John's best point is that Tannenbaum's fate is ultimately tied to the career path of Sanchez. Those pesky NFL quarterbacks - some may downplay their importance on the field, but it's difficult to deny that decisions at the top of the hierarchy are tied directly to quarterbacks. That's the nature of the business.
I'm not sold on Tannenbaum, just like I wouldn't be sold on Brandon if he had as much influence as Tannenbaum does in New York. John's right in stating that there are a lot of talented players on the Jets' roster, but he's also responsible for his cocky new head coach, Rex Ryan, and he's gambling by handing the reigns of the franchise to a rookie quarterback coming off of his junior year in college. If Tannenbaum is anything, he's bold - but he's also set himself up to "boom or bust" - and if the team busts, he won't last too long in ultra-impatient New York.
One more "Fishy" story coming your way this afternoon.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't know how the Jets can avoid salary cap hell at some point in the near future.
They had so few draft picks this year to replace aging vets, they signed Sanchez to a huge contract that will prohibit him from leaving for at least four years no matter how bad he might be, and they signed a bunch of free agents with signing bonuses that will make it hard to cut them should a cap stay in place. I will need to remember this article in a year or two when the Jets have like 3 dollars to the salary cap if one even exists by then.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jun 12, 2009 10:07 AM EDT reply actions
By huge, do you think they overpaid? My first thought when the news broke of the deal is that $50M wasn’t all that bad…Wasn’t JaMarcus Russell something ridiculous, like $117M…Granted, Sanchez wasn’t the #1 pick, but it didn’t seem like a bad deal.
I love me some DB's...I might just be Dick Jauron's long lost twin!
It's still 28M guaranteed into a prospect that could blow up in your face...
Think about a guy like Joey Harrington. Selected third overall, huge contract, didn’t work out, cost the Lions dearly. If he doesn’t work out it’ll be a heck of a cap hit for them and they have no insurance.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jun 12, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
they signed Sanchez to a huge contract that will prohibit him from leaving for at least four years no matter how bad he might be
Very fair point. Nobody can survive a top five quarterback who busts.
and they signed a bunch of free agents with signing bonuses that will make it hard to cut them should a cap stay in place.
In 2011, cutting Faneca creates over $7 million in cap space, Jenkins over $4 million, and Damien Woody over $1 million. They can be cut easily.
Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com
I thought Faneca got more bonus money...
but the majority of it was guaranteed with a small signing bonus. Good move if he works out which is a pretty good bet barring injury.
Good moves by Tannenbaum.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jun 13, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
A few disagreements
Perhaps Tannenbaum’s biggest failure as a GM to this point has been his acquisition of QB Brett Favre, who brought plenty of excitement, but very little payoff in his one season in New York.
I don’t think Favre was really a failure on Tannenbaum’s part. He increased expectations, sure, but would the season really have turned out differently if Pennington or Clemens was the quarterback? Maybe they win the division with Pennington and get drilled by the Ravens like Miami did, but even that’s not really clear.
I think a better way to hit him would be the 2006-2007 offseason. Yeah, the Jets were coming off 10 wins, but it was against a really soft schedule. There were gaping holes at spots like nose tackle and outside linebacker to name two, but the team didn’t use its cap space to address them. Then he helped turn starting left guard Pete Kendall’s contract flap into a toxic situation. Kendall got traded with no replacement on the roster. Since then, Tannenbaum has been much more assertive and handled contract standoffs much better so he’s shown he can learn from his mistakes, which is a good thing.
John’s right in stating that there are a lot of talented players on the Jets’ roster, but he’s also responsible for his cocky new head coach, Rex Ryan, and he’s gambling by handing the reigns of the franchise to a rookie quarterback coming off of his junior year in college.
These two guys will probably define the era, but a lot of people think they’re going to succeed. They haven’t taken the field yet so I don’t really see how you can use them as negatives evaluating him.
Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com
I don’t think I used Ryan/Sanchez as negatives at all. All I said was that both, and in particular Sanchez, are gambles.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jun 13, 2009 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions

by 































