Ten Bills to Decide 2009, No. 9: LB Kawika Mitchell
On Thursday, we began a series in which we examine the ten current Buffalo Bills players poised to have the biggest impact - positive or negative - on the Bills' success in the 2009 season. We started the discussions off with RB Marshawn Lynch. We're switching over to the defensive side of the ball for the ninth player on the list, starting weak-side linebacker Kawika Mitchell.
Mitchell, entering the second year of a five-year deal he signed last off-season, had a quietly productive first season with the Bills. In tying for the team lead in sacks with four - which, we should note, is not a low total for a 4-3 linebacker - Mitchell became the first Bill not named Aaron Schobel to lead the team in sacks since 2000 (Marcellus Wiley). Kawika added 82 tackles, two interceptions, two forced fumbles and three defended passes - and although he developed a reputation as an inconsistent tackler, Mitchell was a steadying presence for a Bills linebacking corps that has undergone a severe makeover over the past two off-seasons.
We know what Mitchell brings to the table from an on-field standpoint. Mitchell's true value, however, lies in his presence in the locker room.
While the Bills were roaring out to a 5-1 start in 2008, Mitchell was one of the team's most productive contributors. He had a key sack in a Week 1 win over Seattle, and followed that up in Week 6 with a fourth quarter interception that sealed a Bills win over San Diego (pictured above). Like the rest of his teammates, Mitchell was not as stellar during the stretch run, when the Bills squandered a division lead in finishing 2-8.
It was Mitchell, however, who expounded upon the team's mindset during the losing streak, claiming mid-season that the Bills needed a "mentality adjustment" if they were going to turn themselves around and re-claim the playoff spot they had relinquished. Mitchell was a lone voice of reason during those chaotic times - and even though he was not any more immune to disappearing from games and throwing together terrible stretches of play than the rest of his teammates, at least Mitchell realized where it all went wrong.
Kawika Mitchell is a champion - literally. He alone of current Bills players has a Super Bowl ring. He's been there. He knows what it takes for a team (and more importantly, an underdog team) to reach the pinnacle of its sport. As a member of perhaps the unlikeliest Super Bowl champions in league history, the 2007 New York Giants, Mitchell brings experience to the table that no other Bill can match. He needs to know it. With young players and somewhat overrated veterans making up the leadership portion of Buffalo's defense, Mitchell needs to take command of this unit.
We know what Mitchell brings to the table when he's on the field. He can make plays. He's not as consistent as you'd like, but he's a smart, tough player that can make plays. That makes up for the mistakes. Mitchell's true importance, however, is what he brings to the table behind the scenes. If Mitchell emerges as the leader of this Bills defense - whether it's in a formal role (such as team captain) or in an informal way - the Bills will be better off for it.
0 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
Not really sure about this one….
I can think of many more players that will have a bigger bearing on where the team finishes this year…..(Trent, TO, Evans, Walker, Hangartner, rookie Guards, Schobel, Maybin, Poz, Leo, Whitner, Stroud, even Ellison). I say that because we know what we’re going to get from Mitchell. He’ll be a solid contributer, leader, approach 100 tackles, add an INT or two and be a solid blitzer. I don’t know if there’s much more he can do other than improve his tackling and pursuit. Obviously him remaining on the field will be big, but I’m not sure his play will be a big part of the reason we fail or succeed. If that makes any sense….
By the way, he’s not the only Bill with a ring. Remember Dominic Rhodes and his should-have-been-MVP performance?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jun 27, 2009 1:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you for the most part K, but we do need Mitchell to be even MORE of a leader
Yeah he was a lone voice crying out in the wilderness during our slide into putridity, but we need him to truly man up, kick some peoples rear ends on the D side of the ball and seize control of the D along with Whitner and make them ALL more responsible. No more leadership by example only, we need a true voice to speak up for the D who will also back it up. Mitchell could be this player, if he wants it….
(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T
-textsfromlastnight.com
by WABillsfan on Jun 27, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mitchell could be this player, if he wants it….
Wanted: Defensive leader
It's just a game.
by jj24 on Jun 27, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would inclusion of Mitchell on this list because he’s a “known quantity” not be cool, but having Marshawn on it – who is probably the most known quantity on the entire roster – be cool?
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jun 28, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take a crack at this.
This is what I K is getting at.
Mitchell is at a point in his career where he’s probably too old to get a lot better, yet, young enough to not have a drop off in his game. Therefore, he is, more or less, a known quantity. He’s also a solid one, at that. It seems likely that Mitchell will have a performance consistent with last season.
As far as Marshawn goes, we think he has a chance to really improve his game and fulfill more of his “potential”, once he actually plays a game again. Ugh. Yes, we know Maarshawn is good, but, how good is he?
That’s all I’ve got. These are good write ups, Brian. Can I take a guess who #1 is? : )
It's just a game.
by jj24 on Jun 28, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sort of…
Has nothing to do with age.
I just don’t think Mitchell has much more upside, and we know what he’ll give us. A guy like Lynch can still improve and give us what seems like much more. I just don’t see Mitchell hurting or helping us so much that he’ll be “deciding” 2009.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jun 28, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, but what does upside have to do with this list? I’ll tell you right now that Marcus Stroud is going to be on this list, and he’s going to be up near the top of it. His upside, at this point, is limited. This isn’t about players that make or break next season – upside belongs on that kind of list. This is a list, basically, of the top ten dudes that have a shot at having the biggest impact on next season, old or young. I don’t think Mitchell should be excluded because he’s a known quantity as a player; I think he’s included because he has untapped potential (or upside, I guess) as a resource in the locker room. :)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jun 28, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marcus Stroud should be on this list. If he gets injured and misses time and we’re forced to start Johnson or McCargo, our D is going to be even worse.
I guess I misread the whole idea of these articles. The “Decide 2009” part led me to believe their potential impact (or loss) could dramatically determine how this season plays out. That’s where Mitchell’s solid play doesn’t seem to have a major bearing on whether the team will be good or bad. I think other guys would obviously be well ahead of him. We all know what Lynch will be giving us, but he also seems more than able to be even better and put up bigger rushing totals. And if that were to happen, I would expect he’d be a big part of “deciding 2009”.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jun 28, 2009 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When a guy like Mitchell is very, very likely to have a season like last year than one that is much better or worse, then he shouldn’t be on a list like this. Buffalo isn’t an 11-5 team that just needs to repeat its success to make the playoffs. They need to get better and players who aren’t going to get better just can’t be the guys who are going to make or break the season.
Guys like Lynch and Stroud, while established, could have all different kinds of success or dissapointment next year and that is why they should be on the list. Mitchell is what he is and while he is a guy capable of winning a game with a big play or two, we actually kind of need him to do that once or twice and almost have to expect that Mitchell makes a key INT or forces a fumble at the right moment once or twice.
by kaisertown on Jun 30, 2009 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts exactly, and I would also add as a side note that I tend to be a little skeptical of the leadership potential for ring-holders. I mean sure, they’ve been there and so they automatically know some things that others won’t, but I just have a hard time believing that everyone who’s ever won a championship automatically becomes a leader when they move to a new team. I know that isn’t exactly what you were implying but sometimes I get the feeling that some people think like that, where as in reality even super-bowl winning teams have to have some players that just flat out can’t lead.
- TEMS
"We want to win immediately. To say you're building is an incomplete sentence. ... You're building for a future coach and general manager."
-Marv Levy
by TEMSON on Jun 27, 2009 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If it means anything to you guys.
Im a chiefs fan have and always will be. But i keep up to date with a few teams such as the bills b/c of ex players that i routed for. This guy has a nack for being in the right place at the right time and has that sideline to sideline speed that makes good LBs great. Obviously he is not a GREAT lb in this league bet most definitely starting quality. G/L to you guys this season, unless you come back to arrowhead and kick out asses while i am there….no grudge.
by xfatdannx on Jun 27, 2009 8:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We’re definirely glad to have Mitchell on our team. He’s in a debatable two way tie for our best linebacker.
Good luck to you guys, too. Except against the Bills, of course.
It's just a game.
by jj24 on Jun 28, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Need is definately There
But are we the only ones that see it. Sounds like Mitchell attempted to motivate the troops during the last half of the season but with limited sucess. It doesn’t seem like the front office persued this much in the off season as well. We drafted defense high but an un proven rookie isn’t going to fill this roll sucessfully and the only remaining veteran returning that wasn’t available last year is Aaron Schobel. I know Schobel is a non stop kind of player, you can knock him around but don’t blink because he never gives up and will eventually wear you out. IMO I am waiting for POZ to mature into this role. His two main qualities are intelligence and desire. The one lacking quality is experience. He is a third year player with only one full year behind him. I think the time is now for him to bring it all together.
by VanScottM on Jun 27, 2009 11:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Poz may be on this list, we're only at 9!
But I agree with you, that Poz needs to lead the defense….but I also think Mitchell will help him do that.
The Bills CAN win any game
by killascript on Jun 28, 2009 1:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I hope he is too!
Poz being in his 3rd year now (TWO in reality), I feel will in deed step it up and I’d like to think that Mitchell would be a GOOD part in that actually happening.
If our front 4 can do their job to the fullest, I can see BOTH Mitch & Poz having a breakout year in ’09.
Season Ticket Holder Sec: 312, Row: 15
"There's NO place like home when it's the Big Tree Inn"
by Pocono Bob on Jun 30, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Mitchell
But I felt he lacks some agility out there against some quicker backs, as well as in coverage. He had a good statistical year, but he got burned plenty as well. I’m n ot sure why, but it happened.
Anyway, I think the best way he can be a leader, is to help pass the torch to someone like Poz, and inspire younger players to lead the team, and sit back like an elder statesman, and stand behind a young player like Poz….
The Bills CAN win any game
by killascript on Jun 28, 2009 1:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I am hoping Mitchell in his second season in the AFC will know his victums a little better and show improvement in his game. Glad he is with us but he had his hands full last year with Crowell injured all year, Schobel going down, a second year rookie MLB and Ellison opposite him.
by VanScottM on Jun 28, 2009 11:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he's solid but unspectacular IMO
Can't stop to save my soul
I take the leash that's leading me
I'm bleeding me, whoa!
by Patssuck456 on Jun 28, 2009 7:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just a thought, but what player on our D could be called spectacular last year? We were average on every single front. Certain players stepping up could change that, but seriously, who was spectacular?
Delightfully Ignoring The Truth since 1995.
by NeverendingOptimism on Jun 30, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 























