Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation NFL Twitter List

20/20 Hindsight: Re-examining the Bills' 2006 off-season


TE Robert Royal joined the Bills in 2006 (photo source)

To say that the current front office regime of the Buffalo Bills has taken a lot of criticism over the past three-plus years is an understatement. The group - featuring GM Marv Levy (for two years), COO Russ Brandon (for two years), head coach Dick Jauron and VPs John Guy and Tom Modrak - has made several bold personnel decisions through four off-seasons of re-building, and the result has been three consecutive 7-9 seasons. When finger-pointing, most Bills' fans fingers - we'll leave you to speculate on which fingers are used - are pointing directly at this group.

As hindsight is 20/20, we thought it would be prudent to take a look back at the regime's initial off-season in Buffalo, transitioning between 2005's 5-11 group (led by GM Tom Donahoe and head coach Mike Mularkey) and the '06 Bills that would finish 7-9 under the leadership of Levy and Jauron. How did the Bills get there? More importantly, looking back three years later, do we perceive the season as one of progress or recession?

Here's how the 2006 off-season (with a bit of in-season dashed in) unfolded in Buffalo. Your homework? Tell us whether or not you like what happened.

+ Jauron chooses - then sticks with - QB J.P. Losman
When Jauron arrived in Buffalo, he inherited a murky quarterback situation. The 2005 Bills, behind Mularkey and his desperation to field a winner, split QB duties between Losman - a first-year starter - and veteran Kelly Holcomb. Jauron held an "open competition" during training camp for starting quarterback duties, but it quickly became apparent that Losman would beat out Holcomb - which, of course, he eventually did.

Far more importantly, Jauron stuck with Losman, even after the team started 2-5. Jauron's patience paid off a bit, as Losman would go on to enjoy his best season as a pro, finishing the season with an 84.9 quarterback rating, 3,051 yards passing, 19 TD and 14 INT. The Bills closed out the season 5-4, with a Christmas Eve loss to the Tennessee Titans permanently derailing their playoff hopes. Clearly, we all know how Losman's career finished in Buffalo, but Jauron gets a thumbs-up for this move - in the midst of re-building, he got a full year out of his inherited young quarterback, found out what he had in the asset, and nearly pulled a playoff appearance out of the decision.

+ The mid-season O-Line shuffle
Buffalo started the season 2-5; during their Week 8 bye, Jauron elected - rather boldly, I might add - to re-shuffle his offensive line. Mike Gandy moved from left tackle to left guard. Jason Peters flipped from right tackle to left tackle - a position at which he would earn two Pro Bowl berths in later seasons. Rookie seventh-round draft pick Terrance Pennington took over at right tackle; while starting C Melvin Fowler and RG Chris Villarrial (with Duke Preston as an injury fill-in) remained, Tutan Reyes found himself on the bench.

By all accounts, Buffalo's offense functioned better during a stretch that saw the team put up a 5-2 record to reach 7-7, on the cusp of the playoffs. The Bills improved their per-game scoring average to 22.2 points per game over their final nine games (5-4), as opposed to just 14.3 points during their 2-5 start. Again - a bold, in-season move by the Bills' coach that paid dividends.

There were some good moves made, clearly, but not all was peachy keen during '06 - the initial season for the current regime. Head on in past the jump for other important developments during the 2006 season.

Star-divide

+ Finding five rookie contributors in the Draft
In an off-season in which the team rid itself of some veteran roster fat (see below point), the Bills did well to find five rookies that were able to contribute positively in 2006. S Donte Whitner (Round 1), S Ko Simpson (Round 4), DT Kyle Williams (Round 5), LB Keith Ellison (Round 6) and OT Terrance Pennington (Round 7) all started games, with the first three on that list emerging as full-time starters. Three more players - DT John McCargo (Round 1), CB Ashton Youboty (Round 3) and OT Brad Butler (Round 5) have contributed as well, though the rookie season impact of each player was largely minimal.

+ Shedding veteran roster fat
The first thing Jauron and the current regime did upon arriving in Buffalo was get rid of overpriced and/or underachieving veterans. Household names such as WR Eric Moulds, OT Mike Williams, DT Sam Adams and safeties Troy Vincent and Lawyer Milloy were let go. TE Mark Campbell, OG Bennie Anderson, C Trey Teague and LB Jeff Posey joined them. The Bills didn't have salary cap issues at that point in time, but losing these players didn't exactly hurt them in the long run - not even Adams, a pretty good player in his heyday, was productive post-Buffalo (23 tackles and 2 sacks in his final two seasons).

- Weak free agent class
Perhaps the most frequently-referenced and noticeable downfall to this initial off-season was the lack of impact found in the free agent class. Take a look at the veteran players brought in:

RB Anthony Thomas
WR Peerless Price
WR Andre' Davis
TE Robert Royal
OG Tutan Reyes
C Melvin Fowler
DE Anthony Hargrove (trade)
DT Larry Tripplett
CB Kiwaukee Thomas
S Matt Bowen

Tripplett was the "big" signing of the group, yet he lasted just two unspectacular seasons in a Bills uniform. Royal became notorious for dropped passes and key fumbles. Fowler was a major flop as the starting center, eventually being replaced by the aforementioned Preston - who also is no longer with the team. Perhaps the best player of this group is Davis, a speedy wideout that saw little playing time offensively, signed with Houston in 2007 and promptly put up solid receiving numbers (33 receptions, 583 yards, 3 TD) while returning 3 kickoffs for touchdowns. The sad reality is that of the names on this list, only Royal and Fowler lasted more than two seasons in Buffalo, and neither is with the team any longer.

- Lack of big-play impact
This ties into the free agent group listed above, but also counts for the nine players the Bills drafted (all of whom have been mentioned aside from seventh-round OG Aaron Merz) - Buffalo was unable to find a single long-term impact player during this critical first off-season. Not even Whitner - widely considered one of the NFL's best young players at the safety position - nor other starters from the draft class (Williams and Butler) have earned the "difference-maker" label. Buffalo did well to find a few starters in this draft class - Williams and Butler in particular were excellent picks - but the overall lack of play making from their rookies and, more importantly, their free agents really hamstrung a young team playing behind a young quarterback. Which leads me to my last point...

- Where is the help for Losman?
Any time you're building around a young quarterback, you need to surround him with weapons. Maybe Jauron knew at that point in time that Losman wasn't really his guy; maybe he just wanted to address the defensive side of the ball first (his first five draft picks in Buffalo were defenders, after all). Either way, Trent Edwards wasn't in the picture at that point in time. Losman was the future then. We gave him three late-round rookie linemen, two journeyman veteran linemen (Fowler and Reyes), Peerless Price and Royal. Losman didn't even have a full season's worth of starts under his belt at that point in time; Lee Evans and Willis McGahee were effectively all he had offensively. The offense was productive at times, sure, but is it any surprise that teams eventually figured out that to stop the Bills, all you had to do was double-team Evans?

There's a lot to like about this initial off-season - in particular trimming veteran fat, getting a deep (if unspectacular) draft class, and committing themselves to one quarterback. Those were good moves; so was the mid-season re-structure of the offensive line. But the lack of impact from the rookie class and what many might consider one of the worst free agent classes in team history considerably weakens any positive that emerged from Year One of the Jauron regime in Buffalo.

The poll question is self-explanatory, and the comments section is open. Before you ask, the answer is yes - we'll be doing this for 2007, 2008 and even 2009 as well.

Poll
2006 Buffalo Bills off-season approval rating, three years later - cast your vote!
Approve
135 votes
Disapprove
208 votes
Unsure
71 votes

414 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 27 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

For a new regime, they deserve a big fat failing grade for the 2006 off-season. Yes, there was a lot of work to do, there is no debating that. However, the new regime did such a terrible job bringing in new talent that I’m surprised they were able to compete for a playoff spot in mid-December.

I never got the impression that Jauron and Levy liked Losman. If that’s true, why didn’t they try moving on and getting their own QB? We’ve seen other franchises bring in new regimes that immediately wanted to get their own guys in here. We know Modrak liked Cutler last year, I guess nobody else did.

The free agent signings that year were simply putrid. There’s no other way to describe how bad they all were, both in the quality of the players signed and the deals they received. Bringing in scrubs like Melvin Fowler, Tutan Reyes and Larry Tripplett to start in the trenches was just a terrible judge of talent. They should have been doing everything possible to acquire more draft picks and rebuilding the lines that way. I guess since the roster was so devoid of talent, they had to do whatever they could to try to address the issues.

And then the draft….oy! I’ve said my piece on this one many times over. What a terrible job of using the first three picks (Whitner and two on McCargo) and not getting an impact player. Luckily, they were able to get solid starters in Butler and Williams in the 5th round, and contributing players like Youboty and Ellison, and I suppose Simpson later on. When a new regime comes in, they have to make a good first pick. They didn’t unfortunately. They got a solid player, but they needed more.

I wish they would have just gone into full rebuilding mode. I know at the time it wasn’t something any of us wanted to hear, but it’s what would have been best for the franchise. Instead, it seems they partially went into rebuild mode, and partially tried to win ‘now’. Sticking with the incumbent young QB instead of bringing in their ‘own guy’, one they really liked (if there was one, of course), as well as signing a bunch of crappy free agents may not have been the best of ideas. I also wish they had done more to acquire draft picks (i.e. trade down) and done more to rebuild the trenches. Seriously, Jauron, did you really need to draft 3 DB’s in your first 4 picks when you were starting scrubs like Fowler and Reyes on the OL? Yeesh!

It also seemed they never had much of a plan for the defense. Sure, they were converting to a cover 2/Tampa 2 D, but they never went out to get the players to fit their scheme. Where was the pass rushers? Where was the quick, speedy LB’s? Why did they need 3 DB’s so early?!?

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Jun 3, 2009 12:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You seem angrier when you post in the wee hours of the morning. :)

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Jun 3, 2009 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah. It makes his posts that much better.

If the glove don’t fit, it couldn’t be Whit...

by thatguy34 on Jun 3, 2009 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He’s the only person I know that regularly uses the word “Yeesh”.

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Jun 3, 2009 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeesh indeed!

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Jun 3, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, no anger. Just disgust looking back at that offseason knowing that it’s part of the reason we haven’t gotten above 7-9 under this regime.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Jun 3, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that off-season

was awful for FA…..Obviously the 1st round picks of Whitner and McCargo prevented the team from making significant progress, and we still feel the affects here in 2009. What killed me the most is they tried to just patchwork the OL and then the panicked the next year to get Dockery and Walker. They tried it two ways and both failed miserably. Finally they saw the light this off-season and drafted players that will provide inside OL stability against the AFC East foes. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that if you want to beat a 3-4 alignment, your inside guys are the most important especially in the run game, and how we went all those years with Fowler & Preston is beyond me!

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Jun 3, 2009 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn’t agree more with everything MARV says about the o-line. It should have been the top priority in 2006 and it wasn’t. But I’m not sure I would say that OBD “panicked the next year to get Dockery and Walker.” Walker has proved to be a solid OT and Dockery seemed like a no-risk choice at the time (yes, we overpayed for him, but not that much given the fact that lots of people believed he was just a notch below the Pro Bowl at the time).

On the 2006 draft, Ko Simpson looked like a steal in the 4th round until he suffered a major injury (from which he has apparently not fully recovered), and Youbouty also looked like a great choice until it became clear he was so injury-prone (something not true while he was at Ohio State). So that makes the 2006 draft look a little better. However, the choice of Whitner over Ngata was terrible, as was Jauron’s habit of loading up on DB’s at the expense of other vital positions. If the team has another losing season and Jauron is fired, it will not be for his game-day decision-making, in my opinion, but for his failure to realize that you can’t build an NFL roster on DB’s alone.

by Macktruck on Jun 3, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Were those teams in 3-4 alignments in 2006?

The Pats were with Belichek but what about the Dolphins under Nick Saban? They were a 4-3 team. The Jets were a 4-3 in 2006 too under Mangini.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Jun 3, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was at that Tennessee game. The plays I remember most were Vince Young running through the defense while sportingly giving every member of the D a shot at him on his way to the end zone…..and Royal not getting his feet down an a pass from, I believe, Lee Evans. To me the game was the season in a nutshell: Buffalo couldn’t stop anyone on the ground and it killed them.

While I agree with Kurupt that I don’t think Jauron was completely sold on Losman, I give the man credit for choosing his horse and riding him. We were all pretty well pissed at the Mularkey yo-yo QB situation and Jauron, to his credit, put a stop to it. When it became clear that Losman wasn’t getting the job done Jauron made the switch to Edwards, first via injury and then as the permanent solution.

Shuffling the offensive line during the off-week was a huge gamble and it paid off almost immediately. Granted, there still wasn’t enough talent on the offensive line—part of which was Jauron’s fault. Nick Mangold or John McCargo? It’s an easy call in retrospect, though again Jauron deserves some credit for trying to address what was a horrible run defense. Never mind that Jauron could have done that at #8 with Ngata or, if he really wanted a Tampa 2 type DT, Bunkley.

The list of free agents from 2006 is best viewed a little at a time. When taken together it goes beyond putrid and into the realm of decomposing maggot riddled flesh. As for letting guys go, Adams was a loss. He wasn’t there to make tackles; he was on the team to clog up the middle which he did pretty well. And wasn’t Teague lured to San Fran with a pretty sizeable contract?

Overall, I’d rate it a decent first year outing for Jauron. The draft could have been quite a bit better and the team could have done without any of the free agency ‘additions’. However, both of those were influenced—to an unknown extent—by Marv Levy, a Buffalo legend who deserves a lot of the blame for the draft and free agency failings. On the field, Jauron and a talent starved team put up 7 wins and almost pulled out an entertaining Christmas Eve game (I conned my relatives into meeting in Buffalo with extended family for ‘Christmas’ ,by which I really meant ‘Bills Game’.) against the Flaming Thumbtacks.

by Ron From NM on Jun 3, 2009 9:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

by Marv Levy, a Buffalo legend who deserves a lot of the blame for the draft and free agency failings

Glad you mentioned that Ron – I don’t know why people think Marv was some great acquisition for the front office. I think the Bills could have gotten what they wanted (character, blue collar working players) with a proven GM or personnel person that is already in the league with a track record of success. And no I don’t think that he has a track record of success with the Bills in the early 90’s because I firmly beleive that Polian was responsible for the majority of personnel pickups for that great team – and the Panthers team and the Colts team.

I was skeptical of the Marv pickup when it happened and here we are and I’m still skeptical. Maybe his presence was what was needed – but I think we could have gone a different way. I know Ralph wanted to go to someone he trusted after Donadope screwed him over – but I don’t necessarily think that was a wise move – as evidenced by the draft and FA pickups.

Everyone has a photographic memory… some just don’t have film

by J2 on Jun 3, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Marv’s addition wasn’t that great for personnel, but he served his purpose….a bridge between the Donohoe days and the current regime without having to blow everything up. Whether that was a good thing is ripe for debate.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Jun 4, 2009 2:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't struggle with the weak free agent class as much as many others might.

Most will say that a team is not built to be a winner via free agency. There’s usually a reason most teams don’t keep a guy who signs a lucrative contract elsewhere: his price doesn’t reflect his performance or he doesn’t stand that far apart from the crowd, or guys behind him.

"It's not delivery, it's DiGiorgio!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Jun 3, 2009 10:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

A stable base to build a foundation on

I know we are all looking for “flashy” around here, but without this draft, the moves we made this offseason wouldn’t be possible. The defense is just about where they want it, and a lot of that is based on Whitner and Willams’ stability. There was enough trust in our defensive foundation that the Bills focused on offensive talent for once. (Maybin being available at 11 probably helped too). As much as the draft seemed “sub-par”, 7 of 9 draft picks are still in the NFL and with the Buffalo Bills. That is ridiculous. 3 of them are quality starters (cue boos) Whitner, Butler, and Williams. Ellison is between starter and depth material. McCargo and Youboty both have a chance still to put it together and at the least are quality depth. Ko Simpson is worth millions, hopefully to someone else, even he showed potential at one point.

That kind of depth out of one draft is ridiculous. Sure, they are lacking flash and “play-making” ability, but that might turn up with an offense that does its job. Especially defensive tackles, like McCargo and Williams, take years to reach their full potential. Williams is well on his way, and maybe McCargo is too.

Teams that are established never have this kind of draft retention, obviously, but on their way to being established they did. A draft like this, despite room for quibbling, is how good teams are built.

The free agents, however, were kind of a necessary evil when you have so many holes to fill. Sure, most of them didn’t work out, but how many free agents, especially big ticket guys, really are superstars with their new team? When they were signed, Royal and Tripplett made a lot of sense. Tripplett came from a defense of the same type of ours and appeared to be on the rise, as did Royal. We know now that pretty much all of these free agency signings were mistake. Their approach made sense – get younger guys that appear to have potential so in a few years we’ll still have them when we’re ready to make a run. By all accounts, could the Bills really have predicted these guys would all fall on their faces? Of course not. That’s our luck of late, not bad scouting. Besides Tripplett, I think the free agent that hurt the most was Fowler. If he was able to perform at least at an average level, we might have gone 9-7 this year instead of 7-9 (and if we managed to keep Losman off the field).

In the years preceding this draft and free agency, the offseasons were very chaotic. The new regime’s mission was trying to attain a stable, if unspectacular, foundation on which to build over the next few years. They accomplished that goal with flying colors. This core group of players was the basis of what we’re doing now. Without these guys, we’d still be looking to add “solid” guys to the defense and not taking a risk on Aaron Maybin. It’s because we have the reliability of Whitner that Maybin is here instead of another first round DB from “The Ohio State University”.

by syrbillsfan on Jun 3, 2009 11:06 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I guess my rebuttal to that would be how they went and built the team – they went “outside in” approach instead of “inside out” approach.

They went S, DT, CB, S, DT, OT, OLB, OG, G – while on paper it looks like they addresed their lines they didn’t address them – I guess – properly. By that I mean your best players are at the top of the draft – usually first 3 rounds you can find players that you can pretty much start with it you needed to.

3 of the first 4 picks were in the secondary – they should have focused on the lines early and built the team that way. Build the lines strong – then get your other guys.

I agree with you on the FA pickups and the quality of the FA class and the need for our holes to be plugged.

Everyone has a photographic memory… some just don’t have film

by J2 on Jun 3, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are some philosophical differences for sure. In that draft and FA period they got 2 DT – McCargo and Tripplett, who although busting over time, were thought to have great potential when signed. That is why the other 3 draft picks were in the secondary. If you count Kyle Williams – they brought in 3 DT that year while cutting 1. The draft was DB heavy because they cut Vincent and Milloy, and knew Clements was going to be shown the money in the near future. It really made a lot of sense, it just didn’t work out as planned, like a lot of things for the Bills over the last ten years. I think what makes the last few years a little different than the beginning of the bad stretch is that the organization appears to have a direction and the front office and coaching staff are on the same page.

I don’t think that Levy had much more than final say on who was drafted / signed. He was brought in to provide guidance and direction, which he accomplished, and moved on. Was there a year during the Donahoe era where it seemed the Bills management and staff seemed to be working in concert? When Levy came in, we were a mess. Our best players were either near free agency or older free-agent pickups. It could easily have led the Bills to salary cap hell if handled improperly, and to keep those guys, what could have been gained? 9-7? Maybe. followed by 3-13, etc. for a few more years. It was the right decision to cut their losses, it was a sign of things to come with the current regime and this past offseason. Regardless of cost, if players do not work to potential, they will be cut. If you give the Bills a fair shake, they’ll give you one (See contrast between Freddy Jackson and Jason Peters). That’s organizational good will that will pay dividends in the future. Free agents will want to come here and rookie draftees will be proud to play here, as they once were a long time ago.

Levy, if not a total success, was definitely not a failure. He, like the draft picks he represents, re-introduced class and stability to the Bills organization that was missing since John Butler left. The Bills are in a better position today than they were in 2006 to “gamble” on draft picks looking for a playmaker becuase of the actions in 2006-present. It may not be this year, but certainly by next we will field a playoff contender.

by syrbillsfan on Jun 3, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wait a sec...

They drafted McCargo in the first round and Williams in the 5th. That is building inside out on defense especially factoring in the signings of the “savior” Triplett. That’s buidling inside out if McCargo or Triplett works out which neither did. Luckily Williams has been solid. 2 of the first 5 picks were DTs – almost half.

3 of the 4 picks were in the secondary because we had just franchised Nate Clements and needed a replacement for him for the following year (Youboty in the third) and had no starting caliber safeties on the team. You needed Whitner or another starting safety on this team. Actually you needed two of them. So Simpson and Whitner were good picks too when you have nobody there to play.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Jun 3, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That wasn’t my point – my point was they should have taken the big fatties in the first 3 rounds. They also reached for McCargo – Whitner at 8 with all that line talent still on the board? Youboty in the 3rd with good linemen still on the board?

That was my point

Everyone has a photographic memory… some just don’t have film

by J2 on Jun 4, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But they already thought they addressed it.

Bringing in Triplett and drafting a guy in the first round is a good way to solidify your DT position if one of them worked out. Neither did.

I can’t claim to remember the 3rd round for this year off the top of my head but how many epic linemen were available then? I just think going in thinking you’re drafting linemen is short-sighted and not trusting your draft board.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Jun 4, 2009 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Free Agents don't make winners...

But it would have been nice if one of them was any good. :-)

The draft was solid, if unspectacular.

The O Line shuffle is what stands out to me. I remember when it happened and it was a big deal to more than just Bills fans. They were talking about it all over the place. It worked out for them in the long run even if Peters was the only guy worth anything on that line.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Jun 3, 2009 3:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who were the second level FAs in 2006?

by krytime on Jun 3, 2009 6:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Whatcha mean, kry?

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Jun 3, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

First – this was a great read from you.

Who were the guys they could have gone after in FA who ended up being good signings? I think it’s safe to say from what they did, that they weren’t going to go and make a big splash in FA. But, there had to be some guys out there who signed somewhere else who may have been better additions then Triplett, Price, Royal, etc. Who could we have instead of those clowns?

Aaron Merz. Ugh. Nice call on my part there….

by krytime on Jun 3, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm… interesting…

QB Kerry Collins
QB Jeff Garcia
RB Maurice Morris (whom I believe visited that year)
FB Fred Beasley
TE Christian Fauria
OG Kyle Kosier
C Justin Hartwig
DT Trevor Pryce
DT Kendrick Allen
DE Lance Johnstone
DE Andre Carter
LB David Thornton
LB Paris Lenon
S Chris Hope
S Ryan Clark
CB Andre’ Goodman

Not advocating that “we should have signed these guys1”, but you asked. :)

Full 2006 list

Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more

by Brian Galliford on Jun 3, 2009 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for digging that up. I see a few guys there who could have helped. And if some were signed, it probably would have greatly affected the landscape of the current roster.

by krytime on Jun 4, 2009 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know it sounds rather simplistic, but any year whose moves didn’t end in a playoff berth is a disappointment.
Sure, we got some players and “potential” out of the deal, but the 2006 season and offseason itself was bad because it didn’t get Buffalo into the hunt for the Vince Lombardi Trophy. I feel that we as fans have to draw the line higher than the team is setting it. The Bills are clearly building a team, but it’s on the fans to apply the pressure, keep underachievers on the hot seat, and root out those who aren’t 100% passionately in this for a Super Bowl trophy. And saying 10-6 with a playoff berth is the minimum for a fan’s approval — that’s actually setting the bar low. We can need to have the bar at that point, I believe — while keeping in mind that New England and Pittsburgh would be disappointed with that result, and rightfully so.

The year we make the playoffs — the next year the goal is the Super Bowl. The kind of standards a team sets is reflective of their inner view of themselves. If the Bills’ coaching staff or players should show signs of drooping expectations, The Bills fans can’t accept that.

by Dyl on Jun 3, 2009 9:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Run_like_hell_small
Belichick Interview
Bills_small
Good future draft pick to keep an eye on.
Beast_small
To Lighten Up The Mood...
Small
Bills Coaching Future?
Jphshrink_small
The Back of Ralph Wilson’s Football Card
261x_small
Continuity will lead to success with Buffalo
Small
Fixing This Team Starts in the Trenches
Cody_small
Deja Vu All Over Again
122857_red_sox_angels_baseball_small
Anyone know of any updates on Kevin Everett?
Picture_2_small
Our best chance is keeping Jauron

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Big Cat Country
Jaguars-Chiefs Video Preview
Mocking The Draft
Saturday NFL Draft watch notes
Cincy Jungle
Final Practice/Injury Report: Baltimore Ravens (4-3) at Cincinnati Bengals (5-2)

Editor-in-Chief

Dawesome_copy_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Homertexans_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM