Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

Around the AFC East, Week 3: New England Patriots

At 11-5, the New England Patriots were the best non-playoff team in football last season, missing the playoffs only because of the resurgence of the Miami Dolphins, who also finished 11-5.  Perhaps the biggest downfall to the Patriots' season - and it can certainly be argued that an aging defense and the absence of QB Tom Brady were factors - was the unsettled play of the offensive line.

Despite once again fielding one of the league's best rushing attacks and a relatively consistent scoring juggernaut behind Cassel, the Patriots' line struggled, giving up 47 sacks on the season, with a good portion of them coming in key AFC East matchups.  Many thought that given the line's struggles, the team would look to address the position in the Draft.

That happened, but only in the form of project second-round pick OT Sebastian Vollmer, who likely will not be prepared for game action during the 2009 season.  (It should also be noted that the Patriots were rumored to be high on OG Eric Wood entering draft weekend; Wood, of course, ended up in Buffalo.)  That leaves Matt Light and Nick Kaczur left to man their usual positions; without a serious free agent addition, it's status quo up front for New England.  Is that a worry for Pats fans?  One guy is better suited to answer that than anyone else I know, and that's MaPatsFan from Pats Pulpit.

The offensive line was a bit of an issue in Foxboro last year, with Cassel getting sacked 47 times (not to mention being partially responsible for a certain knee injury).  Yet the line wasn't addressed beyond drafting Vollmer, a project player that probably shouldn't see the field in '09.  Does the line have a chance to improve?  Are Light and Nick Kaczur in particular capable of handling the edge?

MaPatsFan: I don't mean this to sound arrogant, but part of the reason the offensive line was struggling in 2008 was the success the Patriots have had over the last several years, particularly 2007.  In the last eight seasons, the Patriots have played into January six times and four out of six of those stints went into February.  It is my opinion that 2007 was such a difficult run from a player perspective, that it was the straw that broke the camel's back.  Going into 2008 off-season practices, many of the OL starters were so banged up that they didn't see the practice field until late July or early August.  Another reason for the increased number of sacks was Cassel's inexperience.  I remember early in 2008, Cassel going sideways instead of moving up in the pocket.  When he went sideways, he became a target for pass rushers.  Later in the season, he developed a better pocket presence and worked the pocket better.

As you correctly surmise, Vollmer is a project and will see very little time; he's got a lot of guys in front of him before he gets on the field.  As far as the starters and backups, 11 out of 13 have contracts coming due at the end of the 2009.  The pessimist in me is nervous with the much potential change looming overhead.  The optimist in me thinks those 11 will be playing for contracts, be they with the Patriots or another team.  I think they do their very best to play as good as possible in order to maximize their earning potential come negotiation time.

Regarding Light and Kaczur, the latter is playing for a contract and both have had significant rest coming into this season.  Whether or not that's a positive factor in there performance remains to be seen, but I'm of the opinion it can't hurt and I look for them to have a pretty good year keeping Brady upright.

***

I think it's fair to lay most of the line's struggles on Cassel, who struggled a bit early on and clearly had to learn a few things on the fly.  But I'm not sure if I can swallow the idea that several seasons of success would lead to reduced play from your big men.  No matter which way you cut it, the Pats still had over five months of vacation from their Super Bowl loss to the Giants until training camp last season.  That's a significant amount of rest, no matter how banged up you are.

It's not as if this is some nightmare scenario for the Pats.  All five of their guys have experience blocking for Tom Brady - a quarterback that could make five tackling dummies look like Pro Bowl offensive linemen.  The line is gelled, and they're ready to roll.  But the poor 2008 season, coupled with the large number of impending free agents and Brady's iffy knee, made the decision to bring in just one project player up front a strange one.  But who am I to question the roster-building of the New England Patriots?  They'll find a way to make it work.

One more AFC East topic coming your way as we talk Jets running backs.

0 recs  |  Comment 11 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Around SB Nation

The New England Patriots Sit Pat

Mar 2010 from Pats Pulpit - 54 comments

Is John Clayton A Manatee?

Feb 2010 from Battle Red Blog - 123 comments

Comments

Display:

That's pretty pathetic...

blame it on them being tired…

Go with the Cassel stance MaPatsFan.

One more thing… Don’t they always play “as good as possible”?

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Jun 5, 2009 11:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah – I don’t agree with that arguement either.

Like Brian said 5 months. Not to mention the NFL programs for nutrition and body recovery – coaches that give veteran players more time off to relax and rest up. Kind of just skirted the issue there….

Everyone has a photographic memory… some just don’t have film

by J2 on Jun 5, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not sure I would have used this sentence:

All five of their guys have experience blocking for Tom Brady – a quarterback that could make five tackling dummies look like Pro Bowl offensive linemen.

Brady is an excellent pocket QB with good footwork and a quick release, but he’s certainly not mobile, and I would submit that if they didn’t have some solid lineman, it would be Brady that looked like the tackling dummy.

by WhyBillsWhy on Jun 5, 2009 11:10 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well Brady is mobile though – not in the Vick sense – but in the sense that he moves well in the pocket. Manning is the same way – they are mobile in the pocket and move well there – unlike Bledsoe.

Everyone has a photographic memory… some just don’t have film

by J2 on Jun 5, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

While the Pats OL was pretty banged up to start the season last year, I don’t think it was a major factor at all. In reality, New England just had a really overrated pass blocking OL that was exposed with Matt Cassel at QB.

In the few years prior to Brady’s injury, he had been getting sacked about 25 times a season. And that looks pretty good until you take a look at the other elite NFL QBs. Peyton Manning has only been sacked 20+ times once since 2002 and has only been sacked 25+ times once in his career. Drew Brees hasn’t been sacked more than 18 times in his three years in NO and has also only been sacked 25 times once in his career. Even Trent Edwards has averaged fewer sacks per game during his short career than Brady has over the last 5 or so years. Think about that. Edwards has been sacked less often than Tom Brady and all we do is complain about the OL. New England simply has overrated pass blockers. They sure do know how to run block though.

by kaisertown on Jun 5, 2009 12:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Cassel holds the ball far longer than Brady does. Isn’t that the issue they had? I don’t think it’s because the OL was tired from their playoff success (come on!). That’s pretty ridiculous, actually.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Jun 5, 2009 1:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think it’s because the OL was tired from their playoff success (come on!).

If his theory held true, the Bills would have the greatest OL of all time.

If the glove don’t fit, it couldn’t be Whit...

by thatguy34 on Jun 5, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The playoff / world series hangover is a definite phenomenon in baseball. Football has a longer break between the SB and the beginning of the next season. In baseball, it is mostly pitching that is out of whack the season after a long playoff run. With football, I doubt the same thing really happens, it probably was Cassel being in there that mad the most difference in the O-Line performance.

I’m curious to see how the next season pans out for our rivals, technically they have a harder schedule just like us right? The schedule last year played a role in NE and Miami reaching 11-5. Depending on how everything works out, I think 10-6 might win the division this year.

by syrbillsfan on Jun 5, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty banged up

Before the 2008 preseason opener, the OL looked like this :

LT – Kaczur
LG – Mankins
C – Koppen
LG – Yates
LT – Britt

The starting lineup is actually:

LT Light
LG Mankins
C Koppen
RG Neal
RT Kaczur

So 2 out of 5 (Mankins and Koppen) were in position with a total of 3 out of 5 starters. Belichick claimed normal training camp stuff (he said every year you have to “manage” a different group of guys from an injury perspective), but I know most of the Boston-based news media, those with access and witnessing the training camps, seemed worried.

Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit

by MaPatsFan on Jun 5, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

oops

Meant:

RG Yates
RT Britt

Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit

by MaPatsFan on Jun 5, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Picture_2_small
OBD - So far so good, I am quite impressed.
Sisters1_hthumb_small
MMQB - Yes - Peter King
Mrsinister03_small
A response to Peter Bean

Recent FanPosts

Small
My Top 5's for Positions of Need and Mock Draft
Small
A View From A Massachusetts Bills Fan
Small
What about Jake?
1216_large_small
Brady Quinn
Kawika_small
Tim Tebow Talk makes my head want to explode!
T_edwards_070930_gallery_600_1__small
Browns Cut Anderson
1216_large_small
QB vs. OT
Daffy_duck_small
Making the case for Troy Smith
6398_small
Profile Images

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Editor-in-Chief

Ronswanson_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Billshomer_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Nfl-toronto_small kaisertown