Relax everyone - Trent Edwards will prevail
In recent weeks I've read many posts suggesting that Trent Edwards is in his make or break year. Many seem to think that he has not shown anything or at least not enough in his two first years and that he is gun shy. What kind of world do we live in? Immediate gratification, instant success - - or what failure? Have we forgotten that the QB position is by far the hardest to learn? Are we so hungry for success that it is clouding our ability to think? History has shown that many great QBs have taken time to develop properly, often getting the chance to sit behind a seasoned veteran for at least a few seasons prior to taking the field. Also, are we forgetting the importance of the Offensive play-caller in all of this? Is he not to blame at least a little?
Trent Edwards was the lucky guy would got to learn behind Losman and early in his first season was thrown into the frey and ended up playing way above everybodies expectations. This led to a QB controversy and a very awckward situation for him because Losman really was not there to help him in any way. So not only did he not have that veteran to learn from but he also had to look over his shoulder for his first two seasons. In his first year he ended up with a 56.1% completion with a QB rating of 70.4. In his second year, a year in which he had Losman in his back, he increased his completion % to 65.5% and also increaed his rating to 85.4.
I looked at back in history to see how a few well known HOF QBs did in their first two years.
Troy Aikman
Y1: Completion: 56.1% Rating: 55.7
Y2: Completion: 56.6% Rating: 66.6
Terry Bradshaw
Y1: Completion: 38,1% Rating: 30.4
Y2: Completion: 54.4% Rating: 59.7
John Elway
Y1: Completion: 47.3% Rating: 54.9
Y2: Completion: 56.3% Rating: 76.8
Steve Young
Y1: Completion: 52.2% Rating: 56.9
Y2: Completion: 53,7% Rating: 65,5
Now this doesn't prove anything because it surely does not take into account the complement of players around them but we do know that our team has not had decent receiving weapons for quite some time now and our O-Line last year couldn't run block to save their lives so we do know that Trent didn't have much to work with. What this does show however is that Trent Edwards is a very smart and accurate passer even without decent receivers.
I realize that people are anxious to get back to the playoffs and that we are constantly looking for answers as to why we seem to be stuck in the mediocrity zone but as I have said many times before, Trent Edwards is by far one of our main building blocks for the future. I for one am convinced that he will continue to improve and with the new weapons that he now has at his disposal (Owens, Fine/Nelson, Johnson, meaner determined guards), I can smell the playoffs!
This FanPost was written by a registered user of Buffalo Rumblings. Its views do not necessarily reflect the views of Rumblings' editorial staff, but are just as valued as our own.
0 recs |
114 comments
Comments
good point but...
you make a good point qbs do take a little time to develope but let me ask you this. How much time did we give losman. He played one whole year, finished 11th in the NFL as a Q.B then got injured and it was Trent. I am not saying we should have kept with Losman, im just saying we barley gave him more than a year. This is Trents third year, and I do believe this is his make or break year. You can question the line, but he has the playmakers now. If he doesn’t have a good season I believe hes done. I am not crazy about Trent, and I do not think he will be great. He will be an O.K player in this leauge. Some Q.B’s do step right in and play well. Take Jay Cutler, Aaron Rogers, Big Ben and there are a lot more I just can’t think of right now. Jim Kelly for one was pretty good his first year. I don’t thnk Q.Bs need 3-4 years to develope, maybe 2 at most. If your good enough you can come in and contribute right away. Trent just hasn’t shown me he has the talent. I know he def doesn’t have the tougness to play a whole year. so how do you approach that problem? we better have a good backup, and i don’t think fitzpatrick is necessarily better than losman. Would have like to see a vetran instead of some guy as young as Trent. Trent needed someone he could learn from not another 25 year old kid. This teams biggest problem in my eyes lies at the Q.B position, and it has been that way for the last 10 years. I would have traded our 1st and Trent and maybe even next years 2nd for Jay Cutler. That would of really sparked are team. I don’t get why everyone loves Trent, maybe im missing something. The only thing he has shown me is he is smart and a lead which is great, but he lacks the talent. Hopefully he does prevail!!! but im not sold on him at all.
by csc06258 on Jul 5, 2009 2:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Would it have been ‘tough’ to play through a concussion? I don’t see how get injured equates not being tough. In fact, I think part of the problem is that Trent is too willing to put himself in positions where he might get hurt – some might look at that as being too tough.
If you don’t think he’s talented that’s your opinion, I disagree but I won’t bother trying to argue the contrary. I don’t see how you can say he isn’t tough though, injury-prone maybe but it seems to me that he’s plenty tough.
- TEMS
"We want to win immediately. To say you're building is an incomplete sentence. ... You're building for a future coach and general manager."
-Marv Levy
by TEMSON on Jul 5, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I look forward to seeing what Cutler can do with very little weapons and a conservative play-caller. I am not convinced that he’ll be anywhere near as good as he was.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 5, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd say...
Losman’s injury was a convenient way for Jauron and co. to wash their hands of a QB they had little interest in. It happens every time with fringe players and new coaches.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jul 5, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They gave Losman every chance to be successful.
Nobody should argue that point. If Losman was playing better the injury wouldn’t have stopped him from coming back and starting when healthy.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jul 6, 2009 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could actually argue that point quite easily… but it doesn’t really matter anymore.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jul 6, 2009 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You couldn’t see that Losman wasn’t very good, even if he didn’t start for three seasons? He was given chances to show what he could do and pretty much failed in every situation after his decent season. The fact that he hasn’t been picked up by an NFL team should be pretty good proof that he stinks, too.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never said anything about his playing abilities; that wouldn’t be what I’d argue.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jul 6, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then what does it matter? If the team didn’t see him as the future at QB or a guy they could win with, why should they keep trotting him out there and giving him chances to succeed when he probably wouldn’t?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then what does it matter?
LOL. That would be why I said…
but it doesn’t really matter anymore.
:)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jul 6, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They should have kept Bledsoe for an extra year and let JP develop, that was their main snafu.
After a few years, I must admit that I think JP’s mind doesn’t process fast enough and it’s too bad ’cause he sure is gifted with raw talent
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i can agree with this. in terms of physical attributes, his arm and legs really could have led him to be a gifted QB if he didn’t have such a bad attitude towards the work required for the game.
by the_prophet on Jul 8, 2009 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
some points of contention
with your post csc.
1.) Losman went down and Edwards stepped in and played well enough to hold onto the job. Following year, Edwards goes down and Losman is given the CHANCE to play well enough to earn his job back. Instead he comes in and leads us nowhere while looking like a lost rookie at times. So Losman was given a huge chance to start again last season and he flopped so badly hes out of the league.
2.)
If your good enough you can come in and contribute right away.Edwards has come in and contributed right away. You can’t expect everyone to be an all-star right away but Edwards did make a lot contributions. Your mistaken on a few fronts in regards to QBs taking 2 years “at most” to develop as you stated: Aaron Rodgers sat and learned from Brett Favre for 3 seasons and had his good year in his 4th season, Ben Rothlisberger walked into a golden situation in which he did not throw the ball 300 times in either of his first two seasons playing with arguably the leagues best defense and running game at the time and being asked to hand the ball off a lot. You are also using selective names to make your point. Brady Quinn has barely played in his first two seasons and in his third he is in a QB camp battle with Derek Anderson, Kyle Orton played in 15 games his rookie season throwing 9 TDs and 13 picks, barely played the following two seasons and then had a very average 4th season which people are using to say he’ll break out next year in his 5th season. Matt Schaub who is primed to really break out if he can stay healthy watched from the bench for three seasons and is heading into his 6th after finally seeing extensive minutes and throwing more TDs then INTs for hte first time in his career in his 5th season. Young guns entering their prime like Philip Rivers, who sat on the bench his first two seasons before hitting his stride in his 3rd season and Tony Romo, who rode the bench for three years before breaking out in his 5th season, are examples that you may think Edwards is taking a long time to develop because he’s been on the field instead of learning from the bench. Sure there are guys like Cutler and Matt Ryan (who still has only played one season and could regress) but it is the exception not the rule that 2 years is what it takes to develop.
3. I disagree that “Trent just hasn’t shown me he has the talent”, remember csc that every young QB needs a rock. A reliable pass catcher who he can go to when things go south and consistent presence who is there to bail him out. Trent Edwards has never had that. Lee Evans is too inconsistent, we had a black hole at tight end, and Josh Reed simply isn’t good enough to provide him that rock. Terrell Owens changes that and you should see a better TD:Int rate from Trent as a result. Matt Ryan had Roddy White and now gets Tony Gonzalez, Big Ben had Hines Ward, etc. etc.
I agree with keysh, it is too early to pass judgment on Edwards but even I have to admit that if he doesn’t demonstrate a significant improvement in TD:Int ratio he could be in trouble. 7:8 and 11:10 is not acceptable. If he does so again I’d say hes in trouble.
Guards Brad Butler and Brandon Rodd are decent. - Pete Prisco
Brandon Rodd!! Our best player.
by poz on Jul 6, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My def of tough.
Playoffs on the line when we are playing San Fran in that horrible weather while i froze my bum off and he takes himself out of the game at the half. He had a horrible first half but he would of gave us the best chance to win the second half, not losman. You play when the playoffs are on the line. I don’t care if we were a long shot, he sat out. what would brett farve do in that situation. You think he sit out with a hurt groin with the playoffs on the line. I think not. He plays with broken fingers. thats y i thnk trent is not tough and more of a wimp.
by csc06258 on Jul 5, 2009 3:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Trent was legitimately hurt. He missed the next two games. He’s obviously injury prone, but I’ve never heard a player or analyst question his toughness or competitive drive.
by kaisertown on Jul 5, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brett was legitimately hurt all the time, he still played all the time, especially with the playoffs on the line. that was a key point in trents career that turned me away from liking him. If you have a shot you play. It wasn’t like his injury was a broken hand. It was a strained groin, pathetic. and I have heard people question his toughness all the time. mostly analysts and fans.
by csc06258 on Jul 5, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have you ever tried to play a professional sport with a strained groin? 270lb DE’s with 4.5 speed tend to expose that injury, costing your teammates any opportunity to make a play.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jul 5, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When did Brett Favre pull his groin? You can’t play QB without being able to take your drops and planting to get behind your throws. I’m not high on Trent like others, but it’s not because he missed some time due to a legit injury. That’s ridiculous.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When I was a kid, I somehow managed to pull a groin muscle in my sleep. I woke up quite confused and in extreme pain. I literally couldn’t get out of bed for an entire day. Trent was pathetic in that first half because he was too injured to be in the game. If it was an injury he could have played through, then he wouldn’t have missed the next two games because of it.
by kaisertown on Jul 6, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can say Trent is the going to be a great all you want. That doesn’t make it so. If you want to believe that, of course you’re entitled to do so, but don’t expect to sway too many skeptics. That’s up to Trent.
It's just a game.
by jj24 on Jul 5, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I believe based on the numbers, his QB rating has been great while having to play the best team in the league twice per year, having a very mediocre O-line that is incapable of run blocking, not having any receiving threat other than Evans.
Consider also that we had probably the weakest centers in the league and our division is comprised of huge dominating Nose Tackles like Wilfork, Jenkins & Furgeson. I am not defensing him but I realize that 65% completion rate & 85.4 QB rating is quite high for a rookie given those circumstances. Then factor in that Losman was not pleased and was not there to support Trent in any way shape or form – I think 85.4 QB rating is impressive.
I don’t argue that this year there are no excuses and he needs to bring this team to the playoffs and I am convinced that he will.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 5, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do those numbers prove though? Trent wasn’t a rookie last year, so why are you giving him credit as one?
Losman had an 85 rating in his first full season as a starter.
Brian Griese led the NFL with a 103 rating in his second year as a starter.
David Garrard had a 102 in 2007, and an 81 last year.
Looking simply at a QB rating doesn’t mean he’ll be a good QB for many years after. It doesn’t mean he’ll stink either, but throwing up some low QB ratings for future stars early in their careers doesn’t make me trust Trent any more. Just like the above guys don’t prove Trent is going to fall on his face…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In my last two paragraphs I clearly say that these numbers don’t prove anything other than give us an indication. Trent was drafted the year (2007) we basically cleaned house, new O-Line, let Nate walk, let Fletcher & Spikes go also cleaned up the backfield and started fresh with Lynch. Furthermore, Edwards was thrown into the fire that year and it was a war with Losman. Last year he had 1/2 of a season behind his belt so I guess you’re right that he wasn’t a rookie but he wasn’t a 2nd year vet either…
The fact that he progressed well from y1 to y2, throughout that rebuilding process and all out war with JP is a big positive. He also changed coordinators from y1 to y2 and it was a rookie coordinator last year and it showed so obviously his stats were severely affected. I seriously doubt that Cutler, Flacco or Ryan would have faired that much better then him in those 1.5 seasons.
I realize that he hasn’t put up numbers like Cutler but Cutler also has the cast to get it done. In 2007 he had a great O-Line, great running game, great coach, Great receiving core (Marshall, Stockley, Walker & Tony Scheffler) with Bly & Bailey creating turnovers to give him back the ball.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 7:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Denver’s OL was so good in 2007 that they replaced or moved every single starter for the 2008 season. Matt Lepsis was a disaster coming back from injury in 2007. He was benched halfway through the year and then the team drafted Clady to move Lepsis’ replacement back to RT and replace their mediocre RT, Erik Pears. Chris Kuper was the only 2007 starter to even be on Denver’s roster in 2008. Soon to be HOF candidate Tom Nalen went on IR about a month into 2007 and Ben Hamilton was penciled in as a starter before going on IR in training camp. Denver’s OL in 2007 sucked.
Travis Henry averaged a decent 4.1 yards per carry behind the backups that Denver called an OL that year, but there’s a reason he’s out of the league just a couple years later. He didn’t provide a great running game for Cutler in 2007.
Brandon Marshall is a stud, but if we put a post up comparing Marshall to Lee Evans, then I don’t think Bills fans would say Marshall is much better then Evans (even though he is). Javon Walker caught 26 passes in 8 games before going on IR. Brandon Stokely caught 40 passes as the slot guy and Walker’s replacement and Glenn Martinez was the next best WR on the roster. Scheffler and Daniel Graham are solid TEs, but aren’t exactly big time weapons. You say that Denver had a great OL and WRs, but they spent their first two picks in the 2008 draft on an offensive lineman and a WR.
And Denver had 14 INTs in 2007. It was the 6th fewest in the league. The defense gave up 25.6 points per game which was the 5th worst in the league and while the Bills have one of the better special teams units in the league providing good field position, Denver had a mediocre returner in Glenn Martinez and drafted Royal, in part due to his punt returning abilities.
Cutler had a fantastic 2007 completing 63.6% of passes while averaging 7.5 yards per pass attempt and throwing 20 TDs (Trent still only has 18 career TDs) with a supporting cast that wasn’t all that much better than what Trent was working with last year. A great QB makes a solid offense into a good offense. An average QB leads to average players looking like, well, average players.
by kaisertown on Jul 6, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Travis Henry averaged a decent 4.1 yards per carry behind the backups that Denver called an OL that year, but there’s a reason he’s out of the league just a couple years later.
Would cocaine and jail have anything to do with it? :)
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jul 6, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BWAHAHAHAHAH
Umm…. Yes.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jul 6, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha, yeah that’s part of it. The fact that Henry has only had one good season since his back to back great seasons in 2002 and 2003 didn’t help either.
by kaisertown on Jul 6, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A great QB makes a solid offense into a good offense. An average QB leads to average players looking like, well, average players.
Ain’t that the truth….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
First of all, no comparison between Evans & Marshall, Marshall is a freak of nature at 6’4" and 229lbs with his speed? Geez man, I really don’t care if some did a survey – no way that Evans is anywhere near the same league as Marshall.
Denver has awesome receivers (Marshall & Royal) and great TEs and a strong running game, which I’ll admit I did not phrase it right before, I didn’t mean that the Oline was great overall but the are excellent in the running game, always have been with a great coach like shanahan.
Consider that Cutler gets to beat up against the Raiders, Chiefs twice per year and that the chargers are good but nothing like the Pats, if Cutler is so dam good, how come they only finished 7-9 in 2007 and then 8-8 in 2008, when they had such great running games and great receiving threats?
Trent might not be as exiting as Cutler but then again I’ve never seen him with decent weapons to throw to. I am looking forward to seeing what he can do with decent weapons, I am certain that he will impress.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that Cutler has had some really good weapons to work with, but you specifically mentioned 2007 where Cutler didn’t have weapons that were all that much better than Buffalo’s were last year.
And it’s easy to talk about how productive Denver’s offensive players have been, but with a productive QB, they can’t possibly not be productive. Brandon Marshall was a 4th round pick who caught 2 passes before Cutler took over at QB and has exploded since. Scheffler was another 2006 draft pick who didn’t do anything as a rookie and started put up numbers with Cutler. Those supposed;y great weapons that Cutler had in 2007 were second year players who broke out at exactly the same time as Cutler did. Eddie Royal was a rookie last year. Let’s see how all those guys do without Cutler before we say for sure that those weapons are so much better than Buffalo’s.
If anything we could go the other route and say that some of Buffalo’s players (Lee Evans anybody?) have been less productive with Trent at QB. Bledsoe didn’t have a problem getting Evans the ball down the field or in the end zone. Losman didn’t either. Trent has struggled taking advantage of Evans’ abilities and while he and Evans have clicked and made plays in bunches, Evans also has a tendency to dissapear and that is probably Edwards’ fault moreso than Evans’.
So what if Cutler plays Oakland and KC twice per year. Go back and look at where all the teams that Trent played against finished against the pass last year. It’s pathetic how bad the pass defenses we played were and how few TDs we threw against them.
And Cutler hasn’t won games because that defense is terrible. Denver gave up 28 points per game last year. They had the second fewest INTs and the second fewest forced fumbles. What would Buffalo’s record have been last year if our defense played like that. Denver was 8-5 and playoff bound until their defense gave up 112 points in the final three games.
by kaisertown on Jul 6, 2009 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trent Edward’s faced pass defenses:
SEA – 28th – 7.7 yards allowed per attempt
JAX – 30th – 8.1
OAK – 22nd – 7.2
STL – 31st – 8.3
SD – 14th – 6.8
MIA – 17th – 7.0
NYJ – 17th – 7.0
NE (twice) – 24th – 7.3
CLE – 26th – 7.5
KC – 24th – 7.3
SF – 10 – 6.7
DEN – 28th – 7.7
It shouldn’t be tough to be unimpressed when Edwards averages 7.2 yards per attempt against a bunch of teams who give up more than that. Half of his games were against the bottom 10 pass defenses and he still only threw one more TD than INT and threw less than one TD per game.
by kaisertown on Jul 6, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OUCH!!!
That’s even worse than I could have imagined. One top 10 pass D, and that’s #10 SF, and he still only threw 11 TD’s.
Wow I have very guarded optimism, despite what many may think, about Trent as a QB. This doesn’t help me try to picture him taking the next step in his development towards being a good QB.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 7, 2009 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but you specifically mentioned 2007 where Cutler didn’t have weapons that were all that much better than Buffalo’s were last year.
Sorry but I cannot agree with you, you are implying that Sheffler & Marshall were turds without Cutler and that he is the one that created them. The fact that they came alive at the same time as Cutler is maybe a reflection of the fact that Marshall had Walker & Smith in front of him in 2006 and by the way Sheffler had 4 TDs in his rooky year with Plummer. Kaisertown, why don’t you face the fact that Cutler has had the luxury of playing with much better weapons around him and please lets not forget that he’s also had a much better coaching staff. The other thing that he had was a fantastic “Shanahan patented” running game, which helps setup play-action. Shanahan’s zone blocking schemes are legendary, they’ve been successfull at smashing the ball forward regardless who’s in the backfield. Opposing teams must respect that run, which in turn really takes pressure off the QB. Our line in 2007 & 2008 was horrible up the middle, our center position was probably the weakest in the whole league. Our line was decent against the pass but horrible in run blocking. Teams didn’t need to fear that we’d run it at them and they could simply drop back and wait. And then you factor in the two different OCs and Schonert’s predictability in play-calling are at least in his formations – when you take those things into account then Trent’s numbers suddenly look very good given all those circumstances.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 7, 2009 7:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m implying Scheffler and Marshall were rookies without Cutler. If Buffalo didn’t sign TO and Derek Fine and James Hardy had huge years next year, would we say that Trent just had great weapons to work with?
And sure Scheffeler caught 4 TDs, but he also only caught 18 passes. He was far from established. If Derek Fine catches 30 more passes this year then last year, is Fine going to get all the credit as some great player while Edwards is just in a good situation?
by kaisertown on Jul 7, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are twisting my words. I basically am saying that Cutler had great weapons and those weapons were lucky to have Cutler as well and even more importantly for them is that they also had a great coach & system where the running game opens things up for the passing game.
You can disagree with this if you want but it’s a fact.
Trent had no running game to help open things up for the pass, in general because he had one of the weakest centers in the league. Turk was learning and frankly was quite predictable in his play-calling. Other than Evans, our receiving core is quite weak. And you guys keep complaining that Trent checks down too much – me I am happy to see that he’s smart enough not to turn it over (with the exception of the Cleveland game). Given equivalent weapons and coaching and running game, I am convinced that Trent would be at par or better than Cutler, he’s a better leader than Cutler (I read that Cutler is a real primadona in the locker room)
All I was trying to do was outline the fact that we aren’t comparing apples to apples when we compare Trent with Cutler or others that have better weapons. Now with the upgrades I believe that our weapons are definitely at par with everyone else and I remain convinced that Trent will do well – and if he doesn’t then you can complain all you want!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 7, 2009 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, wasn’t trying to twist words. I’m just saying that it’s easy to take productive offensive players and say that the QB succeeded because of them. A QB can’t put up passing stats without somebody putting up receiving stats. Going into 2007, Cutler had a dinged up Javon Walker as his stud WR and he was really ineffective before going on IR. He had second year unknowns starting at WR and TE. And he had a really solid slot receiver in Stokely. Is that really that much better than what Trent had going into last year? Travis Henry was supposed to be the workhorse. Remember, he was a top 10 pick in a lot of fantasy rankings? Well, he sucked and missed most of the year with an injury. Denver also had to replace three of their starting offensive lineman before by the midway point of the season.
I’ll say the same thing again, if Buffalo hadn’t signed TO and had the same weapons as last year, then had to replace three offensive lineman. Evans caught a couple passes per game before going on IR, Marshawn was ineffective and went on IR, Hardy or Johnson caught 100 passes and Derek Fine emerged to be a fringy top 10 TE, wouldn’t Edwards get a ton of credit for that? Why doesn’t Cutler deserve some of the credit for that season?
Trent had no running game to help open things up for the pass
You guys can’t have this both ways. We couldn’t have possibly had no running game last year, but add Dominic Rhodes, a center, a couple of rookie guards and lose Peters and suddenly have a great running game. Buffalo finished 14th in the league in both rushing yards per game and per attempt. People are upset/surprised that Marshawn didn’t end up in Madden’s top 10 RBs. You actually claimed that we have the best three RB group in the league. So you must think that Marshawn and Fred were a pretty good tandem last year. Buffalo did not have “no running game” last year.
I am convinced that Trent would be at par or better than Cutler
You honestly think that if everything had been the same last year except Edwards was the QB in Denver and Cutler was the QB here, that things would be the same or worse for us and the same or better for Denver? You seriously think that Trent would have had the same success in Denver last year that Cutler did?
by kaisertown on Jul 7, 2009 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the way you keep arguing but ommitting a very important piece of my argument, the fact that Denver had much better coaching, coaching that understands how to adjust. They also have a system that can run-block well and they use the run to open the pass. Those two factors are huge.
Last year all we really had was Evans. Fine missed a bunch of games but still, the coaching staff should have inserted him as a starter in the final games over Royal, which they did not. The same way they should have played Scuba Steve way sooner. These two are quality players and superior to the starters but the coaching staff is very mediocre for this kind of decision making.
I think that the QB cannot do it alone. Cutler was lucky to have Marshall & Sheffler and his coach/system the same way that Marshall without Cutler might not have been quite the monster that he has become, I fully understand the point that you are making, that cutler makes the guys around him better. I’m just saying that it goes both ways and a good QB cannot make a dud receiver suddenly look great. Lets be honest, Royal sucks, Hardy was very disappointing in his rookie season and the coaching staff took way too long to start inserting Scuba Steve and Reed sucks at wideout. So basically Trent had one real receiver and his backs to throw to, and guess what? He made the best of what he had and still managed a 65.5% Comp rate and a decent QB rating but people are friggin complaining that he checked down too often. Give this guy weapons and he can perform like Cutler, I and certain of it.
We had a great backfield and I never said otherwise. We had an OC who was not patient at establishing the run and always went to the pass, even though we had no real weapons to talk of. I guess he had absolutely no trust in our Oline which was understandable. We used the pass to establish the run all season and the fact that we finished 14th is because of the 65.5% completion rate, teams we dropping and then opening up some holes for Marshawn. There is not one game all year that we came out running the ball, we’d establish the quick passing game and eventually start leaning on the running game. Crap I remember a game where Marshawn got 13 carries!!
IMO Cutler has a bigger arm and is much more of a gunsligher (à la Brett Favre) and Trent Edwards is more the cerebral type (à la Montana). Trent would have done great in Denver, would he have out performed wath Cutler did, frankly I don’t know maybe not? Would Cutler have been has prolific in Buffalo with our OC and our lack of weapons – absolutely not. His cocky attitude would have gotten him in trouble and for sure his INTs would have surpassed his TDs and a lot of our drives would have ended up in punts. We would have played from deeper deficits more often. He’s a cowboy like Favre is and could loose games just as fast as he wins them. You said it yourself that he tends to force things into spots, you call it anticipation and I call it carelessness (if something underneath was open). I prefer the smart cerebral QB that will move the ball securely down the field and control the clock.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 8, 2009 7:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We used the pass to establish the run all season and the fact that we finished 14th is because of the 65.5% completion rate
That’s nuts. We finished 14th because we weren’t able to run the ball rather well at times, not because Trent could complete 65% of his passes. So the reason the Bills were able to run the ball at all is because of the QB, but Denver didn’t make the playoffs because of the QB? That doesn’t make a whole of sense to me.
I’ve said all along that I don’t believe Edwards will automatically become a great QB simply because of the addition of Owens. It’ll take more than that. You seem more than convinced that having Owens to throw to makes Edwards a star. And give Cutler some credit. It wasn’t just having better coaching and good weapons to throw to, Cutler actually did have a good season himself after all. How can you be convinced that Trent would have done great in Denver and Cutler would have had much less success in Buffalo? I think that’s totally unfair to say.
I prefer the smart cerebral QB that will move the ball securely down the field and control the clock.
I prefer the QB who gets his team in the endzone, no matter how he does it!!!!!!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 8, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll stop twisting words. You are flat wrong about the running game and the way it opens things for Denver, but in some way impedes Trent’s success. Cutler threw the ball 616 times last year, plus got sacked 11 times and most of his 57 rushes were probably pass plays too. Their RBs and FBs combined for a whopping 316 carries. They called a pass play twice as often as a run. Denver’s run does not set up the pass in any imaginable way.
Buffalo on the other hand ran for one fewer yard per game than Denver and threw for 90 yards less per game. Run heavy teams like Buffalo (even though it feels like they gave up on the run, they are still in the top 10 in run to pass ratio) typically use a vertical passing attack. The way a good offense uses the run or pass to set up the other is by pounding the ball, pulling the safeties up and throwing over the top, or vice versa. I think Cutler’s ability and willingness to make deeper throws is a large part of Denver’s success in the run game.
If anything, Trent’s inability to get the ball downfield with any consistency allows the defense to move their safeties forward and makes it more difficult for our RBs to do anything once they get past the DL. When you throw to the RBs as much as Trent does, it makes it easier for the D to key on those players and makes the running game less productive. If Trent can’t hit WRs downfield, then the dumpoffs and running game can only be so effective.
Crap I remember a game where Marshawn got 13 carries!!
Yeah, like the Denver game where our QB led the team with 8 rushes …. oh wait, that was Cutler who led his team in rushing attempts that day. You make it seem like these coaching type issues only happen to Trent and not around the rest of the league. In their second game against SD, Denver only ran the ball 8 times. That’s giving up on the run! Denver had 6 different players lead the team in rushing attempts last year. Denver only had 10 games where a player had double digit rushing attempts. Andre Hall led the team in attempts week one with 10 carries. Ryan Torain had a game with 12 carries. Selvin Young had 3 games where he led the team in attempts. Those totals were 10, 11 and 11 carries. Pittman had 20 carries twice. Tatum Bell had 11 carries once. And FB, Peyton Hillis led the team with carry totals of 10, 17 and 22. So Denver had a player with 13 or more carries in a grand total of 4 games. And you think Denver’s run game was an advantage for Cutler?
Mike Shanahan is certainly a factor in Cutler’s success. But it’s also worth noting that Denver had a first year offensive coordinator calling the plays last year. He also happened to be the youngest OC in the league.
by kaisertown on Jul 8, 2009 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mike Shanahan is certainly a factor in Cutler’s success. But it’s also worth noting that Denver had a first year offensive coordinator calling the plays last year. He also happened to be the youngest OC in the league.
Rick Dennison? Dude’s 51. If you meant Kyle Shanahan, he’s the coordinator in Houston.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jul 8, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought Jeremy Bates was the OC. I guess Dennison was the OC in name, but he’s really just the running game coordinator. Soon to be 33 year old Bates called the plays in Denver last year.
by kaisertown on Jul 8, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn’t the 29-year-old Shanahan still beat him out? Granted, Shanny Jr. didn’t call plays every game (he might have only had one or two), but still…
Good call on Bates. I knew there was someone younger than Dennison, but I couldn’t remember who it was, so I spent like 10 minutes searching the webs for last year’s Denver coaching staff. I completely forgot about Bates.
Buffalo Rumblings - all you care to know about the Buffalo Bills and more
by Brian Galliford on Jul 8, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shanahan is that young? It’s crazy how young coaches are getting.
by kaisertown on Jul 8, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
keysh, why does everything have to be so cut and dry with you!??!?!!!?!? Why is Cutler the reason Denver hasn’t made the playoffs? If you’ve watched Denver at all, you’d see just how pathetic that D is.
You seem to think the only reason Cutler was any good was because he had good players surrounding him, while Trent had nothing but scrubs to work with. Kaiser pointed out that when Cutler was coming into his own, he had a pair of second year players in Marshall and Scheffler, a crappy veteran in Walker and a solid slot in Stokley. Who’s to say that Marshall and Scheffler would have anywhere near the success they had without Cutler. I watched the Broncos a lot last year, and Cutler absolutely forced the ball to Marshall a ton. The guy struggles to get open, yet Cutler kept looking for him. Do you really think Marshall would be putting up consecutive 100 catch seasons with many, if any, other QB’s? I don’t.
Cutler made those players look even better than they are, IMO. They obviously have a ton of talent, but Cutler helped them reach a high level very quickly.
And I don’t agree with the Bills have had no talent. It hasn’t been great, but it’s not like we’re trotting UFL WR’s, RB’s and TE’s out there.
You say that Trent’s numbers look good considering his situation. Those are just excuses to me. Sure, those are definite factors in his average play and the poor output of the offense, but to say his numbers look good under those circumstances is ridiculous. They are what they are.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 7, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting that you ask Keysh why everything has to be so cut and dry…that’s the way your opinions often seem to me, K. If it’s isn’t one extreme, it’s the other…no in-between.
I still maintain that Turk Schonert is the reason Trent wasn’t better against those pass Ds last year.
"I know I'm a true receiver..." Roscoe Parrish, Buffalo Bills - May 2009
"In my heart, I know I'm funny." Lt Steven Hauk, Good Morning Vietnam - 1987
by thefourwinds on Jul 7, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tks, you took the words out of my mouth buddy!
And I also agree with your position on Turk.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 7, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I don’t agree with the Bills have had no talent. It hasn’t been great, but it’s not like we’re trotting UFL WR’s, RB’s and TE’s out there.
Funny thing, I looked at NFL.COM to see the fantasy rankings and the only Bills receiver that is in the top 80 is Lee Evans at #27, and then I looked at the TEs and none of our guys made the list. At 65.5% completion rate and 85.4 QB rating, I seriously doubt that you can blame Trent. My question is how he can get such a high rating & completion rate with such duds?
80 receivers and our only representation comes in at #27, that is really bad!!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 7, 2009 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
?
Was a run heavy team like Buffalo with no competition for the top few spots on the depth chart supposed to have three WRs in the top 80 in early July? Is a team without a clear starter at TE supposed to have somebody ranked? These are projections based on the upcoming season and are hardly a reflection of Buffalo’s offensive talent.
And if we’re using fantasy projections, a better question would be the way that Buffalo’s offensive players were ranked going into 2008, you know, before TO was on the roster. Would Evans really be at 27 if Buffalo didn’t add a WR? Would all three of Reed, Hardy and Johnson be left of the list if Buffalo didn’t have two clear starters with TO on board? And couldn’t a little bit of those low rankings (if you consider two WRs in the top 27 to be low) be based of NFL.com’s worries over 17th ranked Trent Edwards’ ability to find those guys down the field and in the end zone? If anything, I could flip that around and say that Trent has to be the problem if Buffalo is one of a handful of teams with two WRs in the top 27 and their QB only ranks 17th.
by kaisertown on Jul 7, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
These are projections based on the upcoming season and are hardly a reflection of Buffalo’s offensive talent.
Based on last years numbers.. so my point was simply that Reed, Hardy, Johnson (due to lack of playing time), Parrish, Royal, Shouman – played last year and did not make this years projections.
Kaiser you are twisting things again. I was simply answering your objection that the Bills had no talent other than Evans in 2007/2008. Nobody else but Evans cracked the top 80 and Royal who found another starting gig did not crack the top 30. We all know that TO is a playmaker and that was actually the basis for my original post – Now that we have a few playmakers, things will be different.
Let’s you and me agree on one thing. You are not sold on Trent and actually you seem to think that he has not shown that much so far. If Trent does poorly this season and we do not have a winning season, I will gladly write an article to congratulate you and your football analysis abilities and admit that I was a foolish optimist that saw greatness where only an ordinary QB existed. However you must agree to to the same, to admit that you are a pessimist, someone who loves to argue and someone who seems to have a man crush on Cutler.. Let’s both of us put our money where our mouth is!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 8, 2009 7:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously the fantasy rankings use last year’s stats as a basis for the projections. But if Buffalo hadn’t signed TO, would Evans still be down at 27? Or what if Edwards were better or more willing to throw those deep passes and Evans put up the kind of numbers he did with Bledsoe or Losman? Would Evans still be that low? Evans hasn’t been this low in fantasy rankings in years, so how is that anyone’s fault but Edwards’? What if Buffalo had a clear starter at TE instead of a trio of players that national analysts have no clue who is going to emerge out of? It would be tough for fantasy rankings to be much less relevant in this kind of discussion.
The very first thing I wrote in this thread was:
I’m an Edwards believer too
I only come off sounding like a pessimist because some of you guys are ridiculously optimistic. Trent has questions that need to be answered. The reason they are questions is because we don’t know the answer, so I don’t know how you can be so sure that Trent will be able to hit Evans downfield once TO is on the other side, or that Trent will have no problem throwing to a 35 year old possesion WR who is great at getting a step or two on a defender, but is rarely wide open. I have a lot of confidence in Trent, I just think that saying he is as good as Cutler is nothing short of crazy.
A better bet would be who has the better year between Edwards and Cutler. You’d have to think that Edwards has better weapons than Cutler this year so we will see if Edwards’ numbers are suddenly better than Cutler’s. Things like completion %, yards per attempt, TD and turnover rate are simple enough stats to decide.
by kaisertown on Jul 8, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're on buddy
Great call, I agree with comparing both guys this year.
You & K are right that I am very optimistic – how else can I remain motivated to drive 6 hrs to go see games? Last year I drove down for the 49ers game, dropped $500-600 on hotels/meals/booze only to watch my team kick a dam field goal. I was so mad. Then when I drove back on Dec 28th to catch the Patriots game, they outdid themselves and got blanketed!
Buddy, if I loose hope I might as well give-up my season tickets!
But joking aside, I really do not like Jay Cutler, I find he’s a big baby, self-centered and from everything I’ve read he’s a lousy leader in the locker room. I’ll admit that he has one hell of a gun and he’s certainly not affraid to go long but at one point I can see Brett Favre type INT stats. I prefer a Montana style guy, that shows great leadership and is smart. That being said I agree with you guys that Trent needs to prove himself this year because now OBD gave him some weapons so there’s no more excuses. I am convinced that he will do well.
The bet is on!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 8, 2009 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well you are looking at fantasy rankings. Couldn’t you say the QB has a big say in where WR’s rank on that?
Just because there aren’t a lot of our guys ranked highly in FANTASY football doesn’t mean they can’t be solid football players in real life.
Go back to pre-Randy Moss and Wes Welker New England. What WR’s and TE’s did NE ever have that were so highly ranked?
And I still don’t know why you keep talking about my opinion of Trent as if I think he’s the worst QB to ever play the game of football, because that’s what it’s really seemed like to me. I think he’s a solid QB with potential to be much better. I’ve said that numerous times. He hasn’t had the best players around him and the coaching has been pretty awful, but that doesn’t mean he hasn’t played poorly at times too. I just have not been a huge fan of his playing style, which I think he can improve on, and will this year. Will it be enough? I don’t know. But I do know he needs to take more chances and do more to get us in the end zone.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 8, 2009 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know that the QB has some impact here but it is still telling that our #1 guy from last year is only ranked 27th and that none of our other WRs are even ranked. Our starting TE is not even there. Denver on the other hand has Marshall at #13, Royal at #21 and Scheffler at #13. So when you and Kaiser try to compare Cutler and Edwards at par I think you are wrong. Clearly Cutler had more to work with than Edwards, that’s all I was trying to point out. I realize that Fantasy rankings is not the best tool but it’s all I could think of to prove my point. And I’m sorry but I don’t buy that Cutler made those guys look good, I think Trent would have done very well in Denver and Cutler would have struggled probably as much in Buffalo as did Trent.
The way that both you and Kaiser are responding might be why we think that. My post was merely an optimistic view of this season. I am glad to see more weapons around Trent and I believe that he will make good use of them.
I too believe that he needs to do better this year. Unlike you guys however, I like his style and hope that he continues. I like a smart guy that doesn’t try to force things and keeps the ball moving and our defense off the field – Trent is that type of guy. He is not a self-centered guy that thinks he is bigger than life (à la Brett Favre) that forces things into spaces that he shouldn’t.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 8, 2009 7:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
QB rating and completion percentage mean nothing when looked at in isolation. Not to restart an old debate….but everyone pointed to the fact that Rob Johnson had a better QB rating….that’s because he would go to the check down on 3rd and long and complete a pass, or wouldn’t make a throw and take a maddening sack and Flutie would go for the first down and fire an incompletion or risk an interception……to me the stats that matter are W-L record, 3rd down conv. percentage and touchdowns. Trent has done OK with the W-L record, but he needs to take more risks on 3rd down. He has more weapons, now he and the coaches need to have the confidence to use them. If I’m not mistaken, Trent only threw 11 touchdowns last year with 10 interceptions. Simply not making mistakes will not get the job done this year. The defense isn’t good enough week to week to win many games that way.
by bluecollarbuffalo on Jul 9, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good comparison
and it’s a helpful suggestion for why Trent’s rating was so high despite mediocre play/results…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 9, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m an Edwards believer too, but you can’t dismiss how often he checks down as an inteligent decision to avoid risks or something similiar. How often have we seen Edwards throw a pass 15 or more yards downfield when a WR wasn’t very open? He needs to start anticipating guys breaking open and he needs to start making throws when guys only have a step on their defender. If he doesn’t get more comfortable throwing into smaller windows then he is never going to be anything other than a mediocre game manager.
I don’t think you can compare Edwards to QBs who played in the early 80s on a statistical level. Jim Kelly had a career completion percentage of 61%. In 1985, Joe Montana led the league in completion percentage and it was 61%. Last year there were nine players who completed 65% of their passes. The game has changed and QBs aren’t taking nearly as long to develop too. If you were to compare Edwards to guys drafted in the last 5 or so years, then the numbers would look way, way better than guys drafted in the 80s. Ryan, Roethlisberger, Rivers, Rodgers, Cutler, Romo, etc …. Those guys all establised themselves as good starters in just a couple of seasons. And all of the guys who have sucked early in their careers (not that Edwards has sucked) have either made their way to the bench or a new team or are still crappy starters. Guys like Harrington, Carr and Alex Smith never grew into anything over time. When was the last time that a QB put up mediocre numbers for a few seasons and then developed into a top 10 guy?
by kaisertown on Jul 5, 2009 3:29 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Well said
add to that the fact that more college programs are running Pro-style offense which gives QBs experience that makes the transition to the NFL a little easier.
keysh67 – Must of us hope Trent takes that next step and proves that he is the guy, but we have also seen enough “red flags” to make us nervous.
The key to the Bills 2009 season; Can Trent Edwards grow beyond just not being Loseman
by Joe P. on Jul 5, 2009 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I basically agree with keysh67 that Edwards was fairly impressive last year under difficult circumstances and that there is a good likelihood he will have a breakout year in 2009 (PROVIDED the o-line comes together and protects him). However, Kaisertown also makes a good point about earlier QB stats not being comparable with today’s. The reason is the big rules change in the mid-1990s in defining pass interference. The NFL made a decision that it wanted more passes completed and so created a set of new regulations that made it much tougher for DB’s to do their job. That’s why completion percentages went up. Even taking that fact into account, though, I would say Trent’s 85.4 rating tells us something.
by Macktruck on Jul 5, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good job kaiser
Saying a lot of what I have been trying to say.
Checking down is sometimes the right move, but at some point he’s got to take chances downfield. We can’t be a better offense until that happens. Trent doesn’t anticipate receivers getting open at all, and needs to really improve that. How often have we seen him hit someone in stride further than 5 yards downfield? Once a game? Every other game? Any QB can dump it down to the RB’s, heck even Losman was able to do that effectively at times last year, but the best QB’s are able to get it downfield and make some plays. Trent hasn’t done a whole lot of that yet, and definitely hasn’t done it consistently. That needs to change.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given that Evans wasn’t open (double and triple coverage) who was he supposed to anticipate for? Roscoe can’t get off the line, Reed is lousy when he plays outside (no speed at all), Hardy was very disappointing in his rookie season – so I ask you, who was he supposed to anticipate down field? Price was a huge disappointment as well. I realize that people hate to see checkdowns to RBs but it’s not like we had a Tony Sheffler at TE, we were stuck with “dropsies” Royal, who was about as fast as a pregnant cow.
’Cmon guys, you can be pessimistic all you want but please take the surrounding cast of non-playmakers into account before you rush to judgement about Trent Edwards.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I will say in the game I was at against the Raiders...
that I saw him miss some downfield guys running with a step on their defender. But like I said before he may have not been there in his read or past them in his read. I have no way of knowing why.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jul 6, 2009 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
We do not know what his progression is. I remember the INT he threw in the Browns game when it was intended for Royal, why was evans just looking back at the play? no effort and no pattern, it was a horrible play design. Turk is a big factor in Trent’s success or failure, I’d hate to jump to judgement with Trent when it is the factors around him that are the problem
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given that Evans wasn’t open (double and triple coverage) who was he supposed to anticipate for?
Where is your proof of this?
People who have been going to the games say that Trent misses receivers downfield all the time, Evans included. Don’t just make stuff up, keysh!
And yes, he does need to anticipate some of these throws much better. We don’t need a pair of Pro Bowl receivers and Pro Bowl TE for the QB to anticipate throws downfield. Other QB’s with mediocre skill talent can do it, why can’t Trent? He must improve at this, and I don’t see how that’s all that arguable!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I don’t get all this double covered, will be single covered stuff. It’s not like teams were lining up two DBs over Evans and literally double covering him. He had one guy sticking on him and safety help over the top. How is that going to be different this year? Evans is an elite deep threat, teams aren’t just going to stick a CB on him and hope he doesn’t get burnt. Any time that the opposing D doesn’t blitz, there’s 7 guys in coverage and 4 or 5 receiving options. Are we supposed to think that Evans and TO are suddenly going to have one player to beat? This is the NFL and there is always safety help on anything over 20 yards. It can’t be an excuse for Trent.
And “open” is a loose term. I think Trent does hit guys in stride downfield at least a few times per game, but they are always very open. How often does he hit a guy 15 yards downfield when a WR has half a step on the defender? Trent needs to be more confident throwing to these supposed great WRs when they aren’t open, but aren’t really covered either.
by kaisertown on Jul 6, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nicely done. Wholeheartedly agree….
There will be times when both TO and Evans are double covered, and it might be quite often. Trent can’t just be checking down for 3 yards every time, or else we’ll see similar results to last year. He needs to take advantage when a receiver has a step on a defender.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You keep saying he checks down too much
who cares…the guy averaged 7.2 yards/attempt last year and 11.0 yards/catch
If he wants to check it down let him…Thats not to say I wouldn’t love to see him go down field more often, because I would. I just think he wasn’t comfortable enough with his abilities yet. Hes a kid…and needs to grow up (which I pray he does this year). If he threw it down field everytime you wanted him to he would have ended up with 3 interceptions in every game like that horrid cleveland game on Monday night.
The checking down isn’t the problem…he has a great head on his shoulders and plays smart…he just has to have the confidence.
Oh..and a side note: Brady’s career y/a is 7.2 and y/c is 11.5. In his record breaking season of 2007 (which I also pray nevers happens again) he was only at 8.3 y/a and 12.1 y/c.
by Buffalo Mo on Jul 6, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
who cares…the guy averaged 7.2 yards/attempt last year and 11.0 yards/catch
And he threw just 11 TD’s…isn’t that what matters?
You don’t start scoring more TD’s and opening up the passing game by continuously checking down, IMO. It’s not so much that he checks down too much either, it’s that he just doesn’t go downfield nearly enough. The checkdowns seem to happen because he hasn’t been as willing to go downfield.
OK, so he didn’t throw downfield and throw INT’s as a result. But you know what else he didn’t do? Lead us to enough TD’s and points….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're right...
touchdowns are what matters….but I don’t think the lack of them came from “checking down” or because of his unwillingness to go deep.
He was ranked 28th in TD’s thrown last year…pretty awful.
But he was also ranked 25th in attempted passes. Um…I would say that he didn’t get the opportunity to throw it enough. If a guy is averaging 7.2 yards per attempt….I don’t care where he is throwing it…let him throw it more.
Trent was good for his experience level last year…and I think this year he could be…as Tony the Tiger says…GGGREEEAAATT!!
Its play calling in the spots that were they needed it that was lacking last year…I’m hoping this year is better. K…stop being such a debbie downer all the time…its like you have homerphobia.
by Buffalo Mo on Jul 6, 2009 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And he threw just 11 TD’s…isn’t that what matters?
no winning ball games is what matters
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously….
I’m talking about QB stats.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What is wrong with checking it down for four yards to Reed or Marshawn?
4+4+4 = first down
:-)
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jul 6, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well that’s fine and all, if you are picking up first downs consistently and getting into the endzone. We haven’t been, so it’s not like checking down to the RB’s has been all that effective…..Whether going downfield more is the solution or not, I don’t know, but I just don’t think we can score enough and win by throwing short so often….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand your scoring dilemma
But if the Bills get in side the twenty I expect T.O., Hardy, and Marshawn and Freddy to get it going. Trent could always roll out and dive headfirst with no time in the half remaining.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jul 6, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hardy?
Eh, I’m not banking on him doing anything….
We’ve got to be able to run the ball inside the 20 or it won’t matter who we have at WR. Hopefully, the OL gets it together early because we surely need it.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
We’ve got to be able to run the ball inside the 20 or it won’t matter who we have at WR. Hopefully, the OL gets it together early because we surely need it.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jul 7, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trent was moving us down the field like a general but would stall once we’d get to the redzone.
The problem when we’d get to the red-zone was the total lack of real playmakers.
Let’s see… Evans (5’10"), Reed (5’10"), Parrish (5’9") oh and I almost forgot.. Dropsies Royal at 6’4" – And then we had our swiss cheeze center to really help the situation. I really can see how you’d blame Trent for not being able to produce with such weapons!
This year will be different: Hardy (6’5"), Fine (6’4"), Nelson (6’5"), Owens (6’4")
Watch out AFC East!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t realize only tall receivers were threats in the red zone.
I never said it’s Trent’s fault and Trent’s fault only for our offensive woes. It was the entire offense that couldn’t get it done, it’s just that Trent is the leader of said offense. Some of you really get defensive when talking about him, don’t you?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It sure as hell helps. creates great mismatches.
I write a post simply outlining that Trent has performed quite well considering the lack of talent around him and now with more weapons that he should have a good year. I’m not the one who’s been criticizing the guy… Obviously I’ll defend my position, I’m the guy who wrote the post in the first place!
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The issue, K, is that your arguments aren’t consistent. You have blamed the offensive ineptitude on Trent.
I don’t give a flying fig whether Trent remains the QB of the Bills or not, but your arguments simply end up vacillating between one extreme and the other.
"I know I'm a true receiver..." Roscoe Parrish, Buffalo Bills - May 2009
"In my heart, I know I'm funny." Lt Steven Hauk, Good Morning Vietnam - 1987
by thefourwinds on Jul 6, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The QB should probably shoulder more blame than any other player on offense. He is after all the leader of that unit. If you disagree with that, that’s fine, but that’s how I feel about the position. His job is to lead the offense into the endzone, and he hasn’t done it enough. It’s not completely his fault, but he has been part of the problem when we’ve struggled.
I’ve never said that Trent is the reason this offense has stunk. If I have, let me see it because I sure don’t remember it. I’ve discussed before how Schonert has done him no favors, and don’t disagree that the OL and WR’s haven’t helped a whole lot.
All I’ve been trying to say is that he needs to get a whole lot better if this O wants to accomplish anything. I don’t think he’s played all that well throughtout his career, though he’s had his moments, and I’m not of the opinion that him checking down to the RB’s is such a great thing. I’m not ready to say that the addition of TO means Trent will have a good/great year because he has a ways to go after his first two seasons.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 7, 2009 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with 4w
It’s OK you are definitely entitled to your opinion regarding Trent. But I sure as hell ain’t ready to throw in the towel. You ship him off elsewhere and he becomes the next Steve Young or something.. I’ve seen too much from him that tells me that he has the potential to be a great QB. He’s done admirably well with piss-poor coaching and basically fairly ordinary players around him while playing behind a line that cannot open up running lanes.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 7, 2009 7:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude. Why are you putting words in my mouth (or fingers)?? I never said anything about shipping him out. I never said I’m done with him. I think he has potential to be a very good QB, it’s just I don’t think it’s such a guarantee like so many of you. I have agreed that he hasn’t had the best coaching and average talent around him. He needs to step up and play better, and he needs to play a different type of football that he did last year. Why is that such a problem for you? I really don’t understand. You give kaiser crap for talking up Cutler, but blame him for the Broncos missing the playoffs. Anybody says anything you don’t like about Trent and you go crazy!!! Jeez, Trent Edwards really gets everyone going! Let’s hope it’s his play on the field that brings out the best in everyone this year!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 7, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
K, I agree with you on one thing…Trent should shoulder the blame above any other offensive player. But in my mind the OC, Schonert, needs to shoulder quite a bit of the blame for last year’s offense.
"I know I'm a true receiver..." Roscoe Parrish, Buffalo Bills - May 2009
"In my heart, I know I'm funny." Lt Steven Hauk, Good Morning Vietnam - 1987
by thefourwinds on Jul 7, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well I doubt Schonert would accept any blame. He already has shown he’s a guy to deflect blame away from himself as much as possible….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 7, 2009 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eddie Royal caught 5 TDs (or two more than any Bills player did last year) at 5’10 (with shoes on) and 180 pounds. The good QBs make it happen.
by kaisertown on Jul 6, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Santana Moss (5’10") had 6 TD’s, Antwan Randle El (5’10") had 4 TD’s, both more than anybody on the Bills had. Is a very good QB even necessary then?!?!
Other shorter receivers like Greg Jennings had 9, Lance Moore had 10, Laveranues Coles had 7, even Deion Branch had 4 in 8 games. Obviously taller receivers will have an advantage, but it’s not like it’s a requirement to be a threat in the red zone.
Why do I get the feeling that no matter what any of us feel about this topic, nobody will change their mind?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 7, 2009 1:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In Trent We Trust!!!!
Trent does need to get tougher, mature more to become a leader, and get his mojo back this season if we are to have any chance to have the big year that we all have been starving to have.
But as far as him throwing downfield to ‘covered’ receivers versus checking down – isn’t that more of a confidence issue? And not just confidence by Trent in his own abilities, but confidence that if he does gun a riskier throw down the field that his guy is going to go up and get it? In reality, he’s probably battled this on both fronts, but that’s why you put more weapons around him because this confidence should jointly grow through training camp and next season.
When he’s at his best, we will not be stopped with this new offense!
by Blind Faith on Jul 7, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One shorter guy on the roster is fine but a team made up of only pigmees is not.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 7, 2009 7:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never said that he didn’t need to improve. I just find it amazing that people compare him to say Cutler and do not take into account that Cuttler had a much better cast around him and had much better coaching & play-calling.
Trent follows a system, a system that is dictated by his OC. The main problem last year was the fact that other than Evans he really didn’t have much. This year with Owens on the other side and then Jackson being used more in the passing game and Nelson split out he will have a lot of weapons and also the no-huddle should also help him. If he cannot get it done this year then I agree that there is a problem. My only point throughout all this is that he’s done well with nothing around him so I am convinced now with weapons that he will shine
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
Any QB can dump it down to the RB’s, heck even Losman was able to do that effectively at times last year
if that was ever a true statement. That was the biggest issue with Losman. He didn’t have any touch to his short passes. But could he ever throw the long ball. Too bad he couldn’t process information quickly because he did have God given physical talent.
by Byrdeputt on Jul 6, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well he completed 61% of his passes last year. 63% in 2007 and 62% in 2006, so it’s not like he was just chucking it downfield the whole time he was in there.
Just as example….in the AZ game he came in, he completed 3 passes each to Jackson and Lynch out of his 15 completions. In the Jets disaster he completed 24 passes for just 148 yards. Jackson had 6 catches, Lynch 3 and McIntyre 1.
He was able to complete the checkdowns to the RB’s, but like Edwards, those really didn’t amount to anything. We’ve gotta score more points and I just am not convinced checkdowns can accomplish that.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats right.......
the man crush is alive and well.
Godspeed Nick - RIP - 1986-2009
by norcaliangelsfan on Jul 5, 2009 7:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Different eras keysh. The NFL is different now. QB’s need to perform pretty quickly or they’ll be replaced, like it or not. Sure, maybe that’s giving up on guys too soon, but such is life in today’s NFL. Coaching staffs need to win now. If the QB can’t get it done, they’ll try someone new looking for him to get it done. Just like any position. With so much coaching and roster turnover, if the QB doesn’t perform after a few seasons, they’re gone and a new staff is searching for his guy. That’s just the way things are now.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 6, 2009 12:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Same with coaches.
Back in the day most coaches got 5 years to prove it because that’s how long it took to develop your draftees. Now it’s three years because of free agency. Things have changed.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jul 6, 2009 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not that different my friend...
Do you think that Tampa Bay regretted letting Steve Young go? How many HOF QBs did they get after they dumped him?
What is critical when developing a young QB is to surround him properly during his maturation process (2-4years) with the proper system & play-makers around him. Patience is so important in the development of a QB. I think this is still true today.
At least this year OBD gave Trent another receiving weapon. I think Scuba Steve is progressing very well and Fine will be a huge improvement over Royal and the system and OC have not changed – some good stability. They also made a conscious effort to improve the OLine but unfortunately it will be a big question mark because they are all playing new positions and two rookies will be starters. These are the reasons why I feel that Trent will prevail.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 6, 2009 8:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree keysh67
I think as long as the rookies on the O line hold up, now Trent has two huge weapons to throw to, no more double coverages. And he did hit Evans for a few long bombs at the beginning of the year when open, so I know he can throw them, and accurately. If we have a running game that is respected, and we should with 3 excellent running backs, and some play calling that is mixed and original then Trents numbers should get a very healthy bump. If I see the same running play over and over started 7 yards in the back field, the O line plays like rookies, or there is an injury to TO or LE then oh oh. All of which would have no bearing on Trents skills as a QB, I think he’s ready to become among the best.
by mavadjdj on Jul 6, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the fact that you as well believe that Trent will prevail, which I happen to agree with. However, I don’t truth be told like how you use comparisons to players like Aikman and Bradshaw, because back when they were playing the circumstances were “surprisingly so” very much different. Terry Bradshaw had – in todays NFL-standards – very abysmal QB-rating of his career, but what mattered the most was his toughness and how he led the Steelers to Super Bowl after Super Bowl.
That being underlined, I have very high hopes for Trent looking at the always cloudy future, and my belief is that he’ll become a very strong starting QB for the next many years.
Time will divulge if our hopes of Trent leading us to the promised land are to be accomplished.
by BillsfanfromDenmark on Jul 7, 2009 12:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My point was simply that not all QBs started like Matt Ryan or Joe Flacco.
Look at Drew Brees, he had a few rough years in SD and SD let him slip away. Now they were lucky because they had Rivers and he turned out pretty good but honestly they had no way of knowing for sure and even today I would say that Brees is a superior QB to Rivers. Expectations for Brees were too high in the first few years and the Chargers were too impatient with him.
That being said, I do firmly believe that regardless how well Trent plays this season, we need to draft a QB in the next draft. I am not a huge Fitz fan and I think we need an upgrade that can push Trent.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 7, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s a good example. Brees did have two pretty bad seasons before breaking out in a big way in his 4th year in the league and third as a starter. I’m not sure there’s been another player since Brees to take a full three years to assert himself as his team’s future at QB and then suddenly grab hold of the role.
by kaisertown on Jul 7, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trent was better than Brees was in his first 2 seasons as a starter in SD, though they are very comparable. Nobody really saw the Brees turnaround coming either.
But not every QB, or even many at all, become top flight QB’s after playing such mediocre football for a few seasons. Hopefully, Trent is more Brees-like than he is David Carr-like.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jul 8, 2009 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points...
I would argue that most QBs don’t get the chance. Carr did because he was a number one overall pick. Harrington did because he was number 3 overall (I think). A guy like Losman or a lower pick won’t.
Trent is a nerve topic for a lot of fans because we like him and want him to succeed. I’m not blind to his faults or how far he has to come but I am optimistic.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Jul 8, 2009 7:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bree & Edwards are both cerebral type QBs
Maybe cerebral guys take a little longer to develop?
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 8, 2009 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Steve Young
Was absolutely horrible in Tampa his first two seasons
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 8, 2009 7:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Steve Young is another guy who sucked when he played in the early 80s. Has there been another QB, since Brees who has been that bad and then developed into somebody even decent?
by kaisertown on Jul 8, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ive mostly stayed out of this epic battle
and it has been epic but just to throw into this small little corner of the war I think this point of “since Brees” is moot for both your arguments. While kaiser is right that there hasnt been anyone since Brees, the point can’t really be brought to mean any thing for either side because every productive starter since Brees was either a rookie wonder (Roethlisberger, Cutler, Ryan and Flacco) or sat for two or more years (Rodgers, Rivers, Schaub, Romo). Thats basically the range. Edwards is the only guy who since Brees who was asked to start right away and wasnt a rookie wonder.
An interesting point of note. The four guys who had rookie wonder seasons had one thing in common. Very good defenses. Lets get Cutler out of the way because he only played 5 games his rookie year but still threw 9 TDs to 5 INTs. His rookie season, 2006, the Broncos ranked 21st in pass defense but were ranked 3rd in passing TDs given up. They were ranked 12th against the run and 8th in total points allowed. Pretty good. Flacco’s defense was ranked 2nd overall and 3rd in points given up. Roethlisberger’s 2004 defense ranked 1st in points allowed AND 1st in overall defense. Finally, Matt Ryan’s rookie defense ranked 24th overall, not great, but 11th in points allowed, pretty good.
So how did Trent’s rookie defense do? Do I have to remind that our 2007 defense ranked 18th in points allowed, not great, and 31st, absolutely wretched, in total defense. Now this ranking could have to do with Trent and JPs futility but it could also indicate that of the 5 QBs thrown into the fire their rookie seasons, Trent has taken the longest to produce because his defenses slowed his development. While his rookie D was 2nd to last Flaccos was second best and Roethlisbergers was the best. Cutlers D ranked 8th in pts and Matty Ices ranked 11th, Edwards’ ranked 18th.
I’m not taking a side here, because this certainly doesn’t take Edwards off the hook as he simply didn’t look good last year after the bye week but what I am saying is that I don’t think its relevant to compare Edwards to other modern day QBs. We are treading on ground unique to this era of QBs with the only guy between one year wonders and bench warmers for a few seasons. Personally, I still believe in Edwards, but I can see why some don’t.
Guards Brad Butler and Brandon Rodd are decent. - Pete Prisco
Brandon Rodd!! Our best player.
by poz on Jul 8, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t call Cutler a rookie phenom. He was just OK as a rookie and really broke out in his second year and his defense really stunk then. It’s tough to really say that Matt Ryan had a good defense or a good situation when he took over.
You can even go back past Brees for a few years. Peyton Manning and Brady only took a couple seasons to figure things out. So in 12-15 years you havn’t really had a QB not named Drew Brees who struggled for a couple of seasons before developing into a good QB (Donovan McNabb is pretty close and Kerry Collins kind of did too). That’s a long time span for something that used to happen for every QB.
And is sitting on the bench for two years and then being named the starter with no game experience (like Rivers) and stepping in and playing great in year 3 that much easier than playing half (or more) of the season as a rookie and being the starter in year 2?
And I know the NFL experience is much more important than anything college can offer, but it is worth pointing out that Trent is only 6 months younger than Jay Cutler. He’s not much more than a year younger than Roethlisberger and is actually a month older than Aaron Rodgers.
by kaisertown on Jul 10, 2009 3:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kaisertown lets look at it fairly
That’s a long time span for something that used to happen for every QB.
Granted in the past you used to see QBs stuggle for a few years before getting better – but for the most part many of the better QBs playing the game today got the opportunity to learn behind a veteran (Palmer, Rodgers, Rivers, Brady, Cutler (Albeith only 11 games), Hasselbeck, even Drew Brees played a year behind Flutie)
Flacco, Ryan, McNabb are special – and I’d warn that we might still see Ryan or Flacco regress before we crown them kings.. The majority of QBs that are drafted get the opportunity to learn the system behind a veteran QB. And those that don’t have that benefit tend to struggle more in the early years. Trent started 10 games his rookie year and right away was thrown into a QB controversy with JP, not a great way to sit back and learn.
And is sitting on the bench for two years and then being named the starter with no game experience (like Rivers) and stepping in and playing great in year 3 that much easier than playing half (or more) of the season as a rookieFor sure!! 2 years to learn the system? for sure it’s better! But even this example is rare because most of the time they get to replace during injuries and if they play well enough they supplant the starter.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 10, 2009 7:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eli Manning comes to mind
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Jul 8, 2009 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eli...definately comes to mind.
I am still shocked they stuck with him that long…the fans were booing him.
by Buffalo Mo on Jul 9, 2009 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually think Eli helps make my point. He had a bad rookie year, but how much has he really improved in the four years since then? His completion percentage has steadily risen, but his TD ratios have remained constant and his yards per attempt hasn’t shown progress either. Considering that he’s had a good defense, good receivers and a great running game, he hasn’t shown nearly the progress that Giants fans have been expecting. It took Eli two years to become the QB that he pretty much still is.
by kaisertown on Jul 10, 2009 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Edwards can be good
But these things need to happen.
1)More intermediate downfield passing
2)more TDs
3)more wins
4)more yards
These qualities a good qb make, and if Edwards does this, even if he throws more picks, or his completion percentage goes down a bit, he would have made a big stride in leading this team to victory. To me the most important stat for a QB is TDs. If you have a lot of those, you’re usually doing something right…and Bills QBs have not been tossing alot of TDs in a long time
The Bills CAN win any game
by killascript on Jul 9, 2009 12:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
TO should take care of TDs
TO should help open up intermediate down field passing by himself or for his teammates (I’m looking at you Josh Reed and Fine/Schouman!)
The rest is one the O-line
Do we need all four to happen? How about 2 out of 4? Yes? No?
Guards Brad Butler and Brandon Rodd are decent. - Pete Prisco
Brandon Rodd!! Our best player.
by poz on Jul 9, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think if 2 are happening
Then all four are happening. And yes, TO does shore up these things, but Edwards still has to pull the trigger. I think the Bills have a very good chance to turn the corner, based on experience gained for the young players the past two seasons and Schonert hopefully gaining alot of experience calling his own plays last year.
This is a big year if there ever was one, and I am on the optimist side of the coin when it comes to Edwards. I like how he throws the ball, I just think the second half of the year was harder than anticipated, and injuries got the better of him. I actually don’t think the concussion did him in physically, as much as our division foes really nailed us scheme-wise, and we will need alot better coaching down the stretch.
Also, I expect the interior of our offensive line to surprise people with their competence. I have a feeling the players are all dedicated to elevating their game, and the new C Hangartner will help bring the rookies along, while he himself will have somehting to prove as well. I am excited to say the least
The Bills CAN win any game
by killascript on Jul 9, 2009 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















