Packers 31, Bills 21: Film Review, Offense
The Buffalo Bills are coming off of a lackluster performance in a 31-21 road pre-season loss to the Green Bay Packers. While I still maintain that this isn't happening, there was plenty to be concerned about for the Bills in all three phases of the game.
As it's pre-season, and the games are still pretend, I only watched enough of the game back on DVR to get through the starters. I'll skim the second half tomorrow (to post Tuesday) to take a look at some younger players. Talking points from Buffalo's abysmal offensive effort are after the jump.
Quick offensive line reviews
First thing's first - the line play wasn't nearly as bad as everyone's making it out to be. That's not to say it wasn't bad, obviously; it was pretty bad. But let's not forget that this was the third time the unit was playing together. They played virtually the entire half, and they were very inconsistent. On one play, the line would formulate a pristine pocket, and on the next, they'd spring a leak. Inconsistency is expected, but there's enough positive right now to keep even the most cynical of Bills fans from drowning in a sea of emotion. Well, that's not true, I suppose, but I'm trying to save lives here.
Langston Walker: I thought Walker looked very solid in pass protection. He's having some issues sustaining blocks, but that should change when the games count. He was called for a hold, but that was a ticky tack call that came out of nowhere. Very strange call; Dick Jauron was not happy with it, and neither was Walker. Walker's run blocking leaves a lot to be desired; he doesn't have that road grader mentality that usually comes with a man of his stature.
Andy Levitre: He struggled. Ryan Pickett and Cullen Jenkins were able to toss him around with ease and steer him into running lanes on more than one occasion. On one play, the telecast cut off the snap cutting away from a replay, and in the first frame, Levitre was literally running backwards toward Buffalo's end zone. That play resulted in a three-yard loss on a toss to Marshawn Lynch. Levitre had some nice pull blocks, but he was the clear weak link last night.
Geoff Hangartner: Had a bad false start penalty where it looked like he wasn't sure of the snap count. He was also handled by Ryan Pickett a couple of times, but handled him right back a few other times. For the most part, Hangartner looked good. He's very quick to get to the second level.
Eric Wood: Wood was beaten badly on two occasions, with one leading to a sack. He was also late getting into the flow of an otherwise perfectly-executed screen play; had he been a hair quicker, he might have been able to prevent Jenkins' forced fumble on Fred Jackson. Otherwise, Wood was solid.
Brad Butler: I liked what I saw out of Butler. He, too, was driven yards into the backfield by a defensive end on the sack that Wood allowed, but otherwise he was OK. His pass protection looks solid, too, particularly in handling speed rushers.
In all, the line is still very much a work in progress - as it should be. What is missing are the truly spectacular blocks; the Bills are either terrible or efficient/adequate. There haven't been any "wow" blocks from this group yet. A few of those over the last two pre-season games would be nice.
Trent Edwards was as bad as advertised
Edwards was efficient in the team's first two pre-season games, though he was hardly spectacular. Last night, however, his no-huddle attack lacked tempo, there were several miscommunications and missed reads on his part, and his decision-making was questionable as well. Just a few quick notes:
- Edwards is inconsistent in making decisions on when to vacate the pocket. He had a couple of nice decisions in which he was flushed due to a blitz, and he turned both of those plays into positive yardage. On his sack/lost fumble, however, he had time to whip the ball out of bounds or tuck and run, but couldn't seem to decide between the two. In the end, he just kind of jogged and got nailed from behind.
- On his interception, his hesitancy to make the throw was visible, as he actually hitched for a beat in his delivery before making the throw. It took a little off the velocity of the ball, and it certainly made the throw a hair late. If he delivers the ball on time, that's a first down on a medium-sized gain. His split-second hesitancy allowed S Nick Collins to break on the throw and get a hand in front of Lee Evans.
- For the most part, Edwards was looking in the right spot with his throws. On at least two occasions, however, Edwards had a read that he missed. One was a poor throw to Josh Reed; Reed was open, but a good throw might have been picked, and meanwhile, Evans was wide open in single coverage on the other side of the field. On another play, a blitz came from Edwards' blind side - and though he sensed it, it appeared that Roscoe Parrish was supposed to be his hot receiver, but the ball went to an unaware Evans. Though the result was an incompletion, Edwards appeared to make the wrong read - and even if he had known the ball should have gone to Parrish, Parrish didn't look anywhere near ready for a throw, either.
Not a lot to be excited about from Trent. I'm quickly getting irritated with the no-huddle. There simply needs to be more tempo. Speed it up!
Miscellaneous items
With the big topics out of the way, I'll just jot down the rest of the notes I took.
- Parrish looked lost on multiple occasions. I mentioned his missed hot. Edwards and Ryan Fitzpatrick also had to point him to the other side of the formation on more than one occasion. For all the talent this guy has, I'm starting to believe that he's not seeing the field as much as he'd like to simply because he's not 100% on the playbook.
- This offense really, really needs Terrell Owens. Edwards obviously needs to get better, but Owens' presence speeds up that process for him. T.O. makes 5's life a ton easier.
- Toss sweeps are a mess. Dominic Rhodes had a long gainer late in the first half on an outside run, but for the most part, these runs were shut down with ferocity by Green Bay's defense. The 3-4 is designed to funnel runs back inside toward big run-stuffers. It's nice to see the Bills trying some things out in terms of outside runs against that defense, but it's clearly not going to work come September 14.
- Speaking of Rhodes, he was a nice surprise last night. He looked quick and agile, and has a bit more burst in space than Fred Jackson. He had some nice runs.
- Shawn Nelson saw some action late in the half, and while his two catches were nice to see (if nowhere near earth-shattering), I concentrated more on his blocking. Nelson gets after it, folks, but my, oh my, his technique is shoddy. He whiffed badly on a couple of blocks. He also sprung Rhodes on his long gainer on the aforementioned toss sweep. There is potential there, to be sure.
- For this last point, I'm going to put it in a blue box, because blue boxes signify importance.
Green Bay played REALLY well defensively. They did a lot of blitzing right up the middle, their defensive ends were outstanding, and it's already pretty well-known that their secondary is the bees' knees. Even their linebackers, considered the weakness of the defense, were tremendously active (channeling my inner Doug Marrone there). Their players made plays, which is all you can ask for out of an NFL player, really.
When you're watching games that don't count in the standings, it's really easy to look at each play individually and concentrate solely on what Bills players did. The microscope is much more focused in these games, because as we don't play Green Bay in the regular season, we don't give a crap about what they do. That's faulty. This is a live, competitive NFL football setting. Players are allowed to make plays. So while it's really easy to point at every little fault and add it to the freak-out pile, it's also important to realize that sometimes, opponents play really well. Buffalo isn't going to be dominant on every play. The Packers, believe it or not, had free license to make plays of their own - and they did. So while it's within everyone's right to be nervous about some things we saw, let's not forget that the Packers are a talented football team. This was a good test for the Bills, and they failed miserably. Literally, there is nowhere to go but up.
0 recs |
62 comments
|
Comments
nelson's blocking
they also used him on the first drive on a 3 and 1. he was lined up outside of walker and they ran left for 5 yards. fine looked terrible to me. just sayin…
by thebillsmakemewannapout on Aug 23, 2009 4:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
nelson's blocking
3rd and 1*
by thebillsmakemewannapout on Aug 23, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, agree about Fine. He did have one nice block early on a short third down that was converted. I saw him absolutely destroyed on a short run, though, and he also dropped a third-down conversion on an Edwards pass that hit him in the gut.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"Our style is simple but not that easy. Roll up your sleeves and play good, solid football." -- Marv Levy
by Brian Galliford on Aug 23, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I have to be honest here, but Fine hasn’t really impressed me at all during these preseason games… the more I see Stupar doing well the more my surprise cut becomes Fine…
by Ghetts on Aug 23, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we saw a lot of the same things, but I would evaluate them differently. It seems to me that if the pass protection varies from efficient/adequate to terrible (which is how I would assess it as well) it becomes very hard for a young QB to establish his rythym, which is going to lead to precisely the sort of errors you describe in Trent’s play. But above all a QB at Trent’s stage needs a solid running game in order for him to succeed in the passing game, and that was just about totally absent for the starters. In a nutshell, if your o-line is good you should be able to dominate the LOS most of the time. If that ever happens, Trent will be fine, but right now the line tilts more to the dominanted side than the dominant.
There’s no question either that GB is a very impressive team that played well last night. But if the Bills are going to reach their goal of the playoffs, they have to be able to compete with teams that good. So far I see no signs of that among the starting offense. Yes, it’s early, but the regular season will be here in three weeks.
by Macktruck on Aug 23, 2009 4:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes, it’s early, but the regular season will be here in three weeks.
Then that’s when I’ll start caring since that’s when they will have, ya konw, prepared for the team they are playing.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 25, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Green Bay
Tha team could easily be one of the best in the NFC and their is no reason to think that thye arent the best… i know ur prob thinking the eagles are better on offense but i think that green bay is better on defense… coaching and scheme are the intngible thing that most people undervalue and ull see that jim johnson being gone may he RIP is gonna be a huge problem and dom capers and arron rodgers maturing is gonna make a huge differnece .. my point is dnt worry too much about last night we played on the road against a great team the BIlls are a good team and i hope that 10-6 is what people are expecting this year
"The only yardstick for success our society has is being a champion. No one remembers anything else."
by TheAutumnWind on Aug 23, 2009 4:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes, the Packers have the ability to make plays but the Bills have the responsibility to stop them and make plays of their own. It’s one thing for a team to make mistakes and give up plays (or make bad plays of their own) and quite another for a team to consistenty both give up plays and make bad plays….as the Bills first string did for most of the first half. It’s a cause for concern.
As for ticky tacky holding calls expect to see more of them this season. Last season, the NFL had something like the fewest offensive line holding calls since the early 90s. The league is going to change that and I expect a lot of questionable holding calls this season. Having watched the line carefully for several years I can tell you that the Bills linemen don’t often do things that are likely to draw flags….but Hang, Wood and Levitre are all new to the team, Walker is playing LT instead of RT and Butler is playing out is space instead of at guard so we’ll have to see how they do.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Aug 23, 2009 4:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Director of NFL refs said they are calling more holds this year. No diggity, no doubt.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 25, 2009 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I worry most about the line and Edwards
We’re going to have to wait to find out, but I think Walker’s going to get replaced by Bell at some point this season. Since coming out of California, Walker’s been a tad soft for an NFL quality offensive lineman. I see him struggling against the likes of Seymour and the OLB’s he’ll see this year.
I also worry about Hangartner’s ability to anchor versus Wilfork and Jenkins. I thought Jason Brown would have been a better UFA signing for the team. I like Hangartner, but I think Wood’s ability at the snap is better than Hangartner’s, and he’ll eventually move to center.
Last, but not least, I worry about Edwards’ psyche. I don’t question his ability or smarts. Will his lack of success against a 3-4 effect his future performance? He never seems to have these issues against a 40 front. I’m really in wait-and-see mode. Will he take the bull-by-the-horns, a la Manning? Or fold like Bledsoe?
Time will tell on all.
by Der Jaeger on Aug 23, 2009 5:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Didn't everybody?
I thought Jason Brown would have been a better UFA signing for the team.
He got paid way too much. Like prevent us from getting T.O. too much.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 25, 2009 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blitz pickup
Did anyone else notice a lot of blitzes by the bills getting absolutely nowhere?? I now rogers can get rid of the ball quickly but i never saw them getting in untouched, I hope Fewell is playing his cards close to his chest.
by thebillsmakemewannapout on Aug 23, 2009 5:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’ll talk more about that in tomorrow morning’s review of the defense. This was the review of the offense. :)
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"Our style is simple but not that easy. Roll up your sleeves and play good, solid football." -- Marv Levy
by Brian Galliford on Aug 23, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha oh yea
what about that new punting scheme??
but on a serious note, are you sure it was wood that messed up on that screen to jackson and not walker??
by thebillsmakemewannapout on Aug 23, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t say Wood messed up. :)
That screen was set up perfectly. Cullen Jenkins read it perfectly and backed off his block. He made that play all by himself. Jackson didn’t see him in time to make him miss. That was just a great play by Jenkins, and the only reason I mentioned Wood was because he saw Jenkins and tried to get over to take him out of the play, but was a hair late in recognizing it. It would have been an outstanding play by Wood, and he just missed it.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"Our style is simple but not that easy. Roll up your sleeves and play good, solid football." -- Marv Levy
by Brian Galliford on Aug 23, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There must be something in the water.
tremendously active (channeling my inner Doug Marrone there)
Boeheim LOVES “tremendous”. It wouldn’t surprise me to hear D-Gross or John Desko drop it a few times either.
Does my double blue box signify extra importance?
I'll donate $1 to help Mary Wilson pay the estate tax...who's with me?!?
by O.J. Is My Bodyguard on Aug 23, 2009 5:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The game is just sitting there
on my DVR waiting for me. Frankly, I haven’t had the courage to look at it because I know it is going to tick me off.
Is Green Bay a good team? Well, they drafted in front of the Bills didn’t they? So yet another team has the ability to go from worse than the Bills to SB contender in one season. When is our turn? And by the way, most people are picking the Vikes to win the NFC North now that Farve is the QB. No excuses…..the Bills laid a big fat egg, but worse than that they looked like they always looked…..like a 7-9 team.
bees’ knees
I didn’t say anything the first time, but WTF???? I thought you weren’t allowed to use that expression unless you wear adult dippers. “cool beans” and “happy camper” are also annoying :-)
"When troops flee, are insubordinate, collapse, or are routed in battle, it is the fault of the general." – Sun Tzu. Yes Jauron, I am talking to you.
by Joe P. on Aug 23, 2009 6:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Packers are one of the most talented teams in the NFL. I think last year was an aberration caused by an underperforming defense. They’ll be good this year, possibly real good. I expect them to win the North.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 23, 2009 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not a happy camper, Joe?
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Aug 24, 2009 8:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You should only be allowed to call someone a "happy camper" if they are actually camping.....and drinking, IMO
"When troops flee, are insubordinate, collapse, or are routed in battle, it is the fault of the general." – Sun Tzu. Yes Jauron, I am talking to you.
by Joe P. on Aug 24, 2009 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and I like my beans hot....."cool beans" taste like crap!
"When troops flee, are insubordinate, collapse, or are routed in battle, it is the fault of the general." – Sun Tzu. Yes Jauron, I am talking to you.
by Joe P. on Aug 24, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but what if they are in a salad?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 24, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Three bean salad – good stuff.
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Aug 25, 2009 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then they would be cold beans.....totally different :-)
"When troops flee, are insubordinate, collapse, or are routed in battle, it is the fault of the general." – Sun Tzu. Yes Jauron, I am talking to you.
by Joe P. on Aug 25, 2009 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My one comment after seeing the highlights:
Stupar ran a great route for his TD.
"I wish we could convince our opponents to play their 2nd and 3rd stringers against ours for the whole game – when it counts." - TEMSON
by thefourwinds on Aug 23, 2009 7:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that he did. he’s been playing really, really well this whole preseason. i hope they keep him and dump CMFB.
by the_prophet on Aug 23, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We need that FB spot for another DE, also. It’s gonna be tough come cut time.
by WhyBillsWhy on Aug 24, 2009 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The second time around
It was still 24-0 at the half, and as ugly but I don’t feel as bad as I did last night. Tasker sums things up pretty good in the halftime ananlysis segment. Turn Overs and Penalties were the big difference. The Pack only put together one long drive. Trent needs to improve on the mental part of the game. This man has a 30M dollar check waiting for him, he can start earning now.
by VanScottM on Aug 23, 2009 9:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
this is what I just wanted to post
I just turned on the Tivo, and after being livid last night i’ve calmed down.
Stupid fumbles early in the drive make it feel alot worse than it was in reality.
Fumbles also happened on 2nd and 10+ and 3rd and 10+ early in the drives. Essentially no good, and no time to make good on something bad.
It’s a pre-season game. You’d like them to get into a rhythm but there was no time. Stupid fumbles/tipped passes screwed everything up.
Although Trent did miss a couple of WIDE open receivers, that ticked me off on the replay.
by JoeSelkirk on Aug 23, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good article, but I really like your post VanScottM good points all
by pasaluki on Aug 23, 2009 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tremendous Doug Marrone addition to the column. Well played sir.
I’m quickly getting irritated with the no-huddle.
But Brian, you said we shouldn’t freak out about the preseason!
Is it me, or is Trent a split second late on nearly every pass? The INT should have been thrown earlier. That was a gift 15-20 yards, but Trent was late getting it to Evans. Instead of throwing it as Lee is breaking in, he should be getting that out in advance. His anticipation was terrible last year, and really needs to improve from where its at now. BTW, it didn’t help that that should have been interference on the INT.
He did make a few nice throws. A 3rd down out pass to Schouman was pretty good. Otherwise, he was flat out bad and looked very similar to the QB from last season. Ugh. Come on Trent, get better over the final two preseason games. At least lead us into the endzone once to give us a little hope, please!!!!
Sidenote: In case I haven’t mentioned it before, our pass rush is beyond woeful. GB has receivers running crossing routes and Rodgers had all day to find them. Our DB’s don’t have a chance in those situations, no chance. Brady is going to have an absolute field day on Monday night if there is no significant improvement.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 23, 2009 11:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But Brian, you said we shouldn’t freak out about the preseason!
Oh, I’m not freaked out. I’m close to being as far away from freaked out as possible. But I’m with Steve Tasker: he was pushing for the tempo to pick up BIG TIME. They might as well have huddled in GB, it was that slow.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"Our style is simple but not that easy. Roll up your sleeves and play good, solid football." -- Marv Levy
by Brian Galliford on Aug 24, 2009 6:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is true. At times I thought they were huddling, it was so slow.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 24, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, completely agreed with you on the tempo thing
A no huddle only works if your actually, you know, pushing the pace to tire out the D, your trying to dictate to them what will happen, not let them dictate to you by running a style of offense they don’t have a D package on the field to counter. We were so slow getting up there and and settled to run the play, the Packers had all the time in the world to get ready for us.
(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T
-textsfromlastnight.com
by WABillsfan on Aug 24, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
It actually seems less wise to me for them to run things the way they have so far in pre-season. If a smart enough team (coordinator/captain) learns what their calls and audible are, they can hear them plain as day. At least if they huddle, it’s under wraps.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 24, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, why is Rich Gannon a part of the Packers television network?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 23, 2009 11:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that was my very first thought watching this.
by dragonwag0n on Aug 24, 2009 1:14 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Because they hired him....
:-)
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 25, 2009 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One more thing….With McIntyre getting carries, are they planning to keep him over Omon as a FB/RB combo to start the year? It seems that they are giving him some looks to see if he could be the emergency 3rd RB early if necessary. That’s not a bad plan, but there really shouldn’t be a reason to keep him anyhow….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 23, 2009 11:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think its more that they are making sure he is the guy they want to let guy, by giving him opportunities to confirm their decision.
by Buffalonian on Aug 23, 2009 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That doesn’t make any sense though. Why would they give a FB with zero career carries and one career preseason carry prior to this year a number of carries? Wouldn’t they just keep him at FB and watch him continue whiffing on lead blocks? Giving him carries leads me to believe they might be searching for a reason to actually keep him….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 23, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really think they were just making sure they aren’t making a mistake letting go of a short yardage option. I think they answered their question.
If you are right and they are giving a FB with zero career carries, carries in preseason in a search to actually use him, then that would be even more bizarre than my theory.
by Buffalonian on Aug 24, 2009 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha, probably is, but either way, it’s an odd thing to be trying…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 24, 2009 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s exactly what they’re doing.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"Our style is simple but not that easy. Roll up your sleeves and play good, solid football." -- Marv Levy
by Brian Galliford on Aug 24, 2009 6:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
would have to check the drive chart to be sure, but i thought i saw them run a pitch out to cmfb. was laughing so hard tears blurred my vision.
i’d call that setting him up to fail. :)
by LeClaireBill on Aug 24, 2009 7:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Despite my teasing a K in another post, he’s right about one thing. The Bills need to find a way to play better against 3-4 defenses. Every other team in our division plays the 3-4, so Buffalo needs to figure out how to beat it (and fast) if they want to think playoffs this year.
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Aug 24, 2009 8:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Buffalo needs to figure out how to beat it (and fast)
Anyone?
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"Our style is simple but not that easy. Roll up your sleeves and play good, solid football." -- Marv Levy
by Brian Galliford on Aug 24, 2009 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
paging all Michael Jackson imitatators
“Buffalo needs to figure out how to beat it (and fast)”
by freddyjj on Aug 24, 2009 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
TWHS
Ha
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 24, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone on the roster able to do the moonwalk?
Get the Bills back to the big game!
by Blitz on Aug 24, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't see the game yet but..
Why the hell did Parrish start at WR2 instead of Scuba Steve? GB have very physical corners so they decide to start their smallest shrimp? This coaching staff are a bunch of morons! Scuba Steve at 6’2" and well over 200lbs could have gotten open for Trent. If Steve is cleared to play then let him play with the big boys and if they were worried about his rib injury with the GB starters, then let him sit-out another week.
Clearly our diminutive receiving options (Evans/Parrish/Reed) cannot get the job done. Last year was proof of that, so let’s move on and accept that Trent needs a few larger options than Evans on the unit in order to succeed.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Aug 24, 2009 8:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why the hell did Parrish start at WR2 instead of Scuba Steve?
I have no idea either – seriously. He reminds me of Jackson. We know he has the “it” factor as far as playing ability – but the coaches are hesitant to pull the trigger sometimes.
However, it could be that they are just trying to be fair for Roscoe and see how he does out there. That’s fine with me – as long as that is the case.
I am so clever that sometimes I don’t understand a single word of what I am saying
by J2 on Aug 24, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re seriously using the fact that Parrish started as more ammo against the coaching staff? It couldn’t be that they just wanted to see if Parrish could produce, or put him on the field to get him reps to up his trade value? Does EVERYTHING have to be used in the argument against Jauron & Co.?
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"Our style is simple but not that easy. Roll up your sleeves and play good, solid football." -- Marv Levy
by Brian Galliford on Aug 24, 2009 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I even agree with this!
Although, Parrish being out there is probably lowering his trade value!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 24, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AGREED
The more I see of Parrish this preseason the more I wish the Bills didn’t have him…
by Ghetts on Aug 24, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree
Since Parrish has yet to prove he is a legitimate WR, how can he be hurting his trade value? His value is as a punter returner, Parrish is the only one that doesn’t know this yet. Maybe now he does and will shut up and accept the role he excels at….PR and #4 WR.
"When troops flee, are insubordinate, collapse, or are routed in battle, it is the fault of the general." – Sun Tzu. Yes Jauron, I am talking to you.
by Joe P. on Aug 24, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I was giving Parrish every benefit of the doubt.
"When troops flee, are insubordinate, collapse, or are routed in battle, it is the fault of the general." – Sun Tzu. Yes Jauron, I am talking to you.
by Joe P. on Aug 25, 2009 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I looked at it as giving Steve Johnson an opportunity to line up at the #1 slot with the 2nd-team offense. If people want to see Roscoe and want him to succeed, they’re going to have to allow the coaching staff to play him.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 24, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
smallest shrimp
That made me chuckle
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 24, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AKA: Salad Shrimp
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 24, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


























