Lynch, Jackson, Rhodes remain heartbeat of Bills offense
Even though NFL pre-season games are largely meaningless, the Buffalo Bills' first-team offensive unit - oh, heck, the offense as a whole, really - has been the centerpiece of a media hailstorm surrounding their lackadaisical pre-season performances. Three points in nine drives (four of which ended in turnovers) for the starting offense will do that.
While most of the attention has been focused on QB Trent Edwards, the receiving corps that is currently stumping along without its own centerpiece (Terrell Owens), and a re-shuffled offensive line that is still very much a work in progress, very few people are talking about the running back stable - a trio that ranks amongst the NFL's deepest and most experienced running back units..
Set aside the fact that Marshawn Lynch will miss the first three games of the season. Forget about Fred Jackson's wrist injury, too; barring a setback, he looks like he'll be ready for the Bills' September 14 season opener in New England. Lynch, Jackson and Dominic Rhodes - who himself has missed time with a knee injury he has since recovered from - have been equally unproductive when compared to the rest of their offensive teammates. Veterans all, the general sentiment is that when the footballs start flying for real, this trio will perform as they always have as individuals - admirably. They'd better perform - with all of the change going on with the rest of the offense, these three running backs carry added importance into the 2009 season.
Pre-season production woes
I suspect that many will point to the aforementioned offensive line and its various inconsistencies as the main reason for the below three stat lines. Is it unfair to expect much more production from the running backs without first seeing improvement in the trenches? Either way, these stat lines are hardly fun to look at:
Lynch (3 games): 14 carries, 29 yards; 3 catches, 8 yards
Jackson (3 games): 15 carries, 38 yards; 3 catches, 22 yards, fumble lost
Rhodes (2 games): 11 carries, 51 yards, TD; muffed punt
I spent a good chunk of this morning talking up the idea that opinions shouldn't change based on pre-season performances. I firmly believe that. As such, I'm still confident that this group will be able to produce yardage when the real games begin, even as Lynch serves his suspension. For two years, amidst some truly horrifying offensive performances, Lynch and Jackson have been the only offensive players that produced consistent, hard-earned results. (Rhodes is cut from the same cloth.) That counts for much, much more than some sub par pre-season performances.
Yet there are - and in Lynch's case, have been for some time - some reasons for concern that have little to do with the pre-season. There is unquestionable talent and depth at this position, but how much can reasonably be expected of any back playing behind a work-in-progress offensive line? How much will Jackson's wrist injury hamper his ability to handle the ball early in the season? Is Rhodes capable of handling the full rushing load if Jackson's injury flares up? How will the three backs deal with reduced roles once all three are available full-time?
Ball-carriers remain heartbeat of offense
Amidst an offense that underwent some seriously radical changes this off-season, the running backs have remained the constant, even if they've received further fortifications in the form of Rhodes. Edwards is commanding a no-huddle attack; his responsibilities have therefore changed dramatically. Once Owens' sprained toe allows him to return to the lineup, the receiving corps will look drastically different. No one's sure yet exactly what the role of the tight end will look like in this offense. We've mentioned the line enough.
While all of that change takes its time to gel into whatever it turns out to be, the running backs will be counted on to carry the offense - again. Lynch and Jackson are still the same players - tough, physical, diversely skilled, and difficult to bring down. Rhodes gives the team a third option that can do many of the same things, though time will tell if he's got as much fight in him as either Marshawn or Freddie. They are the heart and soul of this offense - and, as this team isn't going anywhere without a productive offense, an argument can be made that they're the heart and soul of the team.
It therefore confuses me that the running game is left out of discussions. Hence this post. This is a crowded backfield at the best of times, but to start the season, there are legitimate question marks. How do you perceive the running back situation at the moment? Do you see any potential issues? What are your thoughts on each back's pre-season performances?
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The backs have been disappointing so far but in the preseason with vets like these guys I’m not worried. They have all proven to be capable when the fur starts flying. Even if one or two fall off their old ways, another one is there to pick it up.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
I’d like to see more quick hiters. Line up – snap the ball and hit the gap fast and hard. this should help keep some defenders a step or 2 late.
I am so clever that sometimes I don’t understand a single word of what I am saying
by J2 on Aug 28, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions
As long as the O-line gets tougher
especially in the interior, this running game will be better than it has in the past 3 years. I’m not that worried about Fred’s injury – although I would much rather not be put in a position to doubt him against a team like NE – and Rhodes’ resume speaks for itself. Having 3 weeks off will actually help keep Lynch fresh and when every other starting RB in the NFL is dealing with the first month soreness, Lynch can come in and catch defenses off-guard. With T.O. in town, they’ll face way less stacked boxes to run through. It should be a good year for our running game – provided Schonert doesn’t completely blow it.
I really have no fear about the RB situation. I have always been a fan of Freddy and he works so hard I am sure he will be coming out with something to prove against NE – and we already saw what he did to them at the end of last year. Rhodes has a history of being a great fill in and I am sure he compliment Freddy well (just like Freddy does with Lynch). The line may take some time to gel, but can anyone say it is any worse then the previous decades?
Personally, I am now happy Lynch will miss the first 3 games of the season
He wore down a little near the end last season, so now he gets a 3 week break and should be fresh through the end of the year. Also, with him out and our Oline needing to come together as a whole when the games are truly for real and other teams are doing their best to turn the RB into mincemeat, it’ll be the three backups taking the brunt of that.
By the time the Oline gels enough, which I think will be between weeks 4-6, Lynch will be back and will not be taking kill shots in the backfield, that will have been taken care of by Rhodes, Jackson and Omon.
(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T
-textsfromlastnight.com
I’m not worried about the RB’s. I am terribly worried about our blocking, which thus far has been below competent. I’m afraid our run plays will be the same uncreative up-the-middle runs we’ve seen for too long. Where’s the imagination? Where are the counters, misdirections and outside rushes?
I think the running game could be a mess for a while, at least until the OL plays even average.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 28, 2009 2:34 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
I’m not worried about the RB’s. I am terribly worried about our blocking, which thus far has been below competent.
I agree. If your line is strong, average running backs can do a competent job, if your line sucks, you need Barry Sanders. If the Bills O-Line can get their act together, the running backs will reap the rewards.
No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.
I completly agree
For instance, Shanahans O lines always made average RB’s look good. Then those RB’s sign with another team only to realize it is difficult to put up similar yardage with out gaping holes.
I honestly feel bad for our RB’s. How often to they have an actual hole to run thru? Marshawn and Freddy are fantastic at turning a -2 run into a 2 yard run, but those runs do not show up on the stat sheet. By the looks of our O line, they will struggle once again to get back to the line of scrimmage.
And I am tired of hearing its only pre season or they have not had time to gel ect. Starting 2 rookies (and possible 3, if Bell gets the start, he is a rookie in my eyes) and a making experienced NFL’ers switch positions is just a lack or foresight and planning by our organization. Instead, we sign TO to try and mask it…..child please.
I don’t see how T.O. plays into this at all. He filled a different need.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 29, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Would you agree that it is more important to have a good O line than WR’s? Its like have a fast car with a flat tire.
And it is blatantly obvious we brought in TO for more reasons than catching the football.
I think they did what they had to do for the line for the future. Hang and Butler are about the same age and not old either. Wood and Levitre are stud s in the making IMHO and with Bell possibly the LT of the future, I think the Bills O-Line could be real good as early as mid way through this season. It will take time. I don’t think that there were many quick fixes out there for the FO to go with. they took the youth approach and I think that we will see some good developments in that area as the year goes on.
No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.
And it is blatantly obvious we brought in TO for more reasons than catching the football.
OK, but it wasn’t to help the offensive line.
It is important to have a good OL and good WRs. Otherwise it’d be like driving a car with no piston in the engine, to extend your metaphor.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 30, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Matt I hate to break it to you, but OL is more important than WR. I think any team that has a good OL and DL can compete in this league and we have neither. Free agency has proven that it is easier to get capable WR and RB’s than O lineman. Our organization has over drafted secondary (thank you mr. jauron) rather than OL/DL and it is very frustrating. Looks like we are going to release 1 maybe 2 potential starters, if not good back ups this year from our secondary and here we are trying to piece together our OL. Our OL clearly has effected Trent and his decision making. He is checking down after his first read and his footwork is pathetic. It is pretty sad that we could not complete a pass to Evans or Reed 35 minutes of football last night.
On the other side of the ball, I love our secondary, not including Whitner who I think is very overrated. Leodis is a STUD!! However, with our lack of pass rush puts alot of pressure on our secondary to maintain coverage. A bad DL line can make a good secondary look average or bad. And I think that is the case with us this year. Our “white knights” Schobel, Denney and Kelsay are pretty much usless not to mention we have ALOT of $$ invested in them. I watched Schobel this preseason and he has lost a step, maybe 4 if that is possible. I have him penciled in for 4 meaningless sacks this year. The sooner we get rid of the white knights the better!!
So I hate to be a pessimist, but it is very difficult to look on the positive side when when our best positions are our RB/WR’s and secondary which are both limited by pathetic OL and DL play.
You hate to break it to me? It’s an opinion, boss. The Cardinals had a crappy OL last year and great WRs and they lost the Super Bowl. The Steelers had a crappy OL too. Just because your opinion is different than mine doesn’t make mine wrong.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 30, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Where’s the imagination? Where are the counters, misdirections and outside rushes?
I am HOPING its a case of vanilla syndrome, and they do wise up that these types of runs will not only be very beneficial to the backs, but to the line. It play to their “strength” being a quick moving line, and I’d love some pulling and that sort of thing to get a guy like Wood on the move in front of the backs who will be in singleback formation quite often.
I am not worried about production because it is preseason….but I’m a Bills fan, so worry I must
The Bills CAN win any game
It would be interesting
to see Wood and a TE or FB swing out right and lead for Lynch or Jackson.
"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone"
-Marshawn Lynch-
by billsoferie on Aug 29, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions
it might even work!
The Bills CAN win any game
by killascript on Aug 29, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions
The O-line is worrisome
but more for pass protection than run blocking.
"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone"
-Marshawn Lynch-
this article just reminded me again, why didn’t we go full bore to build a smash mouth offense? specially with the question at QB? i know there are edwards fans out there, but all this guys has shown is that he could be a competent game manager – he isn’t a gamer who’s going to carry the team to wins- least he hasn’t show any flash of game.
is it cuz our only chance with our D is that we outscore everyone so we have no choice but to try a finesse offense?
i’m not feeling too confident about the year.
why didn’t we go full bore to build a smash mouth offense
Umm – I think that’s what they’re trying to do. which is why they drafted wood/levitre and got Hang. From all accounts they are finishers that play with a mean streak.
it’s still going to take time for it to develope – but that’s what they are trying to do.
I am so clever that sometimes I don’t understand a single word of what I am saying
by J2 on Aug 28, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





















