Bills' Reed could be in line for career season
When the Buffalo Bills selected LSU WR Josh Reed in the second round of the 2002 NFL Draft, Reed came into the league - and into a city rich in tradition at his position - with lofty expectations. Reed was coming off of a record-setting career at LSU in which he set conference records for reception yardage in a game (293) and in a season (1,740 in 2001) that stand to this day. When a player is that productive in a conference like the SEC, expectations will be high - whether the talent is there to meet the expectations or not.
Based on those expectations, it's easy to say that the 5'10", 208-pound Reed has been a career underachiever. His career high in receptions is 58; he's never broken 600 receiving yards in an NFL season, and the next time he catches three touchdowns in a season will be the first time he's done it. Limited in the speed and athleticism departments, Reed has been asked to be Buffalo's No. 2 receiver far too often in his career - to the team's detriment, and to Reed's own detriment as well.
Even so, former Bills GM Marv Levy re-signed Reed to a four year deal as one of his first acts upon re-joining the team; when he did so, he likened Reed's skill set to that of Ricky Proehl's. Proehl is remembered as one of the most reliable and productive slot receivers in the past two decades of NFL football. Reed won't be remembered as such, but with Terrell Owens lining up next to Lee Evans on the outside in 2009, Reed could be in line for a career, Proehl-like season in Buffalo.
Being asked to do too much
Reed was lucky early in his Bills career. His rookie season, 2002, was QB Drew Bledsoe's first (and most productive) in Buffalo, and the starting WR duo of Eric Moulds and Peerless Price combined for 194 receptions that season. Reed contributed 37 receptions - not a large number by any means, but he carved a niche for himself immediately and showed the type of player that he has ultimately turned out to be. Unfortunately, Buffalo - by no fault of their own, given the circumstances - thought he might be more.
They were wrong. In 2003, Price was traded, Reed became the team's No. 2 receiver, and while he had arguably his most productive NFL season to date (58 receptions, 588 yards, 2 TD), it was clear then that he was not a starting-caliber NFL receiver. That's why Lee Evans was drafted in the first round the following year; Evans had a highly productive rookie season (including nine touchdowns), but Reed, who missed four games entirely and dealt with injuries throughout the season, caught just 16 passes. That number doubled in 2005, but with an entirely new regime led by Dick Jauron coming in, many thought Reed's Bills career was finished.
Yet Reed was re-signed. In each of the three seasons that Reed has played with Jauron's Bills, he has improved, registering 34, 51 and 56 receptions over the last three seasons. 2006, however, is really the only year that Reed wasn't asked to be the team's No. 2 receiving threat - and that season, the return of Peerless Price did little for the offense, even if it had its moments. Price was expected to improve in 2007, yet he ended the season on IR. In 2008, rookie James Hardy was supposed to complement Evans, but he, too, landed on IR, leaving Reed to pick up the pieces once again.
That's going to change this year. For the first time since his rookie season in 2002, Reed enters a year completely healthy and with two more-than-legitimate receiving threats alongside him. He'll also be playing with a quarterback in Trent Edwards that trusts him and likes to attack the soft underbellies of defenses.
The Proehl Comparison
Ricky Proehl was never a Pro Bowl receiver. He certainly wasn't the type of prominent athlete that would make defensive coordinator lose sleep at night. What Proehl did do, however, was play for 17 years in this league and finish his career with 669 receptions, 8,878 yards and 54 touchdowns. He caught 40 passes in a season nine times, and, as mentioned at top, is still considered one of the best slot/possession receivers of the past two decades.
Reed is cut from the same cloth. He's nowhere near an overwhelming athlete, but has grown to be a reliable target with possession-like qualities. Case in point: 90 of Reed's 141 receptions over the past three seasons (64%) have gone for first down yardage. He's the type of player that defenses forget about, simply because names like Owens and Evans deservedly command more of their attention.
What Proehl did that Reed has not is score touchdowns. That may or may not change; it'd certainly be nice if it did, but to expect it might leave one waiting a while. The lack of touchdowns, however, doesn't mean that Reed can't play an essential role, and do it in a highly productive manner. As long as he, Owens and Evans remain healthy, 60 receptions seems like a minimum goal for Reed this season. Proehl did that three times; Reed nearly did it last year with very little help outside. His numbers likely won't blow anyone away next season, but defenses would do well to keep number 82 in their minds throughout the week. If you forget about this guy, he'll hurt you. That's the value that Reed brings to this offense, and he's got a chance to finally play the role he was meant to play all along in this league.
1 recs |
45 comments
|
Comments
I just hope it won't be considered a disappointment
If he has anything less than a career season. 40 receptions for 400 yards and 2 TDs would do me just fine with our other receivers pulling in passes.
by Dyl on Aug 3, 2009 9:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sweet Jebus, I hope you’re right on Reed. It should help to have a balanced aerial attack. For that matter, I hope all our receivers have a career year. Trying to get everyone (6-7 legit threats on O, damn….) some touches could become a problem, provided that our QBs aren’t in body casts. But then again, that’s a good problem to have (the ball distribution thing, not the body cast thing).
by WhyBillsWhy on Aug 3, 2009 9:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s going to change this year.
Unless, of course, Evans and/or Owens get hurt leaving Reed once again as a starting WR. I was flummoxed when the Bills re-signed Reed. If I remember right, that was the year of the 4 year/$10 million deal—Reed, Royal, and didn’t Greer get one, too?
My issue with Reed wasn’t the money or even the lack of terrific production; it was his maddening habit of dropping easily catchable balls at critical moments in games. For the first two or so seasons Reed appeared to be a headcase. He did work his way through it and, aside from one particularly cowardly moment at the end of a loss to the Jags, has been a workmanlike WR for the Bills.
His blocking ability is probably his trademark to this point in his career. Reed is more than willing to knock heads with almost anyone, never mind his modest size. He has been a valuable asset in the run game, so much so that previous blocking schemes relied heavily on Reed to form one wall (sometimes along with Royal, sometimes just by himself—Butler and Walker crashed down towards their left to create an inverse ‘L’ with the other linemen) of a running lane.
Was he worth a second round pick? No. Of course, you can also say that about Reed’s fellow 2002 second round pick, Ryan Denney. (I needn’t remind people that the first round pick that year was a disaster and the third rounder (Coy Wire) wasn’t anything to write home about either.) Second rounders are supposed to be difference makers. Reed isn’t one of those.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Aug 3, 2009 9:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If Evans or Owens get hurt I wonder if Stevie Johnson will be the one asked to fill in as the #2 wideout rather than Reed. Johnson has more speed and at 6’ 2" more height. That would allow the Bills to keep Reed in the slot where he can be most effective.
by Macktruck on Aug 3, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither Johnson or Reed have much in the speed department.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 3, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, but at this point I believe Johnson is a little faster than Reed. If you had to choose one of them to run deep sideline routes you might well choose Johnson and leave Reed in the slot where he can be so effective.
by Macktruck on Aug 3, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it was his maddening habit of dropping easily catchable balls at critical moments in games.
And how often did that really happen? Dropping a few passes early in a career does not ruin a career, although many Bills fans seemed to think that way. I’m not saying you’re one of them, but a handful of passes resulted in many fans absolutely HATING this guy.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 3, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well it wasn’t just a few passes (maybe time has blurred my memory) but it was definitely Robert Royal esche. If anyone has the exact stats I would really be interested in seeing them. And his drops were always when he was wide open (which he is great at doing) and would’ve been a first down, and instead it was a 3 and out. That is why he was so despised early in his career. Though I am a big fan of what he can help us due for the offense over the last few years…
by Ghetts on Aug 3, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you guys are going to complain about dropped balls, you’re going to want to close your eyes for the T.O. show this year. Personally, I think you have to keep the big picture in mind and a dropped ball here and there can be made up for. But if you’re someone who is gonna have your heart in your throat every time a pass bounces off a set of hands, it could be a rough year.
by WhyBillsWhy on Aug 4, 2009 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reed's second season wasn't his best.
Look at what he has been asked to do since then and look at what he has accomplished. He rebounded quite well and has been an ultimate team player. Glad he is a Bill.
by VanScottM on Aug 4, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reed will definitely have a career year in terms of effectiveness and fan admiration. Drawing nickel CBs should make it even easier for Reed and Trent to pick up those 6-8 yard gainers. There will be times where Reed will be able to get open at will. Reed caught 71% of the passes thrown his way last year. Of the 79 players who had 50 or more passes thrown their way, only Wes Welker (75%), Davone Bess (72%), Anthony Gonzalez (72%), Eddie Royal (71%) and Anquan Boldin (71%) were able to match or better that number. Obviously, Reed’s short routes inflate that number, but now that he isn’t starting, that isn’t a role that can be frowned upon. If it weren’t for Wes Welker (anybody still think he’s just a product of Brady or Belichick?), Reed could lead the league in percentage of targets caught next year.
http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr
Statistically, it’s very unlikely that Reed has a career year. At least, he won’t if your just looking at catches and yards. Buffalo is still going to run more than most teams. And there’s only so many throws to go around. A lot of people believe that TO will make Evans and everybody elses numbers go up, but I’m not sure how that works from a math standpoint. Buffalo isn’t just going to add a 1,000 yard player while everybody elses numbers still go up. Buffalo would need to finish in the top 2 or 3 passing teams in the league for that to happen.
by kaisertown on Aug 3, 2009 10:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually, Buffalo could statistically add 1000 yards passing. Teams routinely hit 4000ish yards per season, while the Bills have been around 3000. So, yes, the yards are there—it’s just a question of whether or not Edwards will be able to hit the 300 yard mark per game on a regular basis instead of once every couple of seasons. He’ll have the opportunities, particularly as Buffalo figures to play from behind for quite a bit of the season. I see Owens as adding to the total as opposed to dividing the current pie amongst one more player. There’s reason to be opt….opt….opt…not so pessimistic as Buffalo improved from 2600 to 3000 passing yards last season.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Aug 3, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Buffalo had 3,300 last year. About 9 teams hit 4,000. Four of those teams threw the ball 38+ times per game and a fifth threw the ball 36.6 times a game. Only San Diego got to 4,000 yards without being in the top 10 in passing attempts per game. The Bills are still going to be a pretty run heavy team. They should at least finish in the top half in the league in percentage of plays that are runs.
And it’s not just adding in TOs numbers. It’s the expectation that other players are going to improve on their totals. So your adding in TO’s 1,000 yards and some more for Evans and Reed.
by kaisertown on Aug 3, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we might be able to increase those numbers as well because we should (in theory) be able to run more plays this year.
We have more weapons – which in turn leaves Reed more open to do his job – so we should be able to pick up more first downs and run more plays.
or we just go deep to TO or Lee and run fewer plays
or the o-line sucks and we run fewer plays.
but…. in theory – we can run more plays because of more weapons
I am so clever that sometimes I don’t understand a single word of what I am saying
by J2 on Aug 3, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah 4,000 yards is a little much for an offense that still have to prove it can cut it. I am right there with you expecting us to remain run oriented. Where I think we’ll see something different, and hope we see something different, is the desire to get the ball downfield. With late season games in KC and home against NE and Indy, whatever passing numbers and consistency we develop may have to take a dip due to the weather.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 3, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He’s nowhere near an overwhelming athlete, but has grown to be a reliable target with possession-like qualities. Case in point: 90 of Reed’s 141 receptions over the past three seasons (64%) have gone for first down yardage.
What percentage of passes go for first downs overall? I would think that’s a normal number.
by Pistol on Aug 3, 2009 10:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As a point of reference, Lee Evans is 137/200 in catches going for first downs in the last three seasons. That’s 68.5% – only 4.5% more than Reed, all while averaging about 4.6 more yards per catch.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"Our style is simple but not that easy. Roll up your sleeves and play good, solid football." -- Marv Levy
by Brian Galliford on Aug 3, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
in other words, while evans is getting big plays, reed is able to do it in short-yardage situations more routinely – making him a threat similar to the tight end in 3-and-short situations.
man, having him, all three of those running backs, and solid short-yard receivers in our two major TEs will give us a lot of options this year if we do more dink-and-dunk instead of longball. that’s good if only because it means that fitzy will have a lot more options underneath if and when edwards goes down – good for a young QB who struggles with accuracy downfield.
by the_prophet on Aug 3, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Steve Johnson is eventually going to become Josh Reeds downfall. Johnson is physically more gifted and the guy has the ability to score MORE touchdowns (10 receptions – 2td vs 56 receptions – 2td)…
by Ghetts on Aug 3, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
situational appearances, only. he’s five inches taller, so they put him in on the goal line instead of reed.
just because he caught 2 tds with 10 balls doesn’t mean he’s going to get 12tds with 60 catches. it was only because he was in the right place at the right time – similar to reed’s TD catches earlier in his career.
by the_prophet on Aug 3, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the main difference between reed and johnson is something Trent said earlier this year on how Steve is great on getting off of press coverage (sorry I don’t have the link). And with Reed is it hard to find the open areas of the defense the closer you get to the goal line (why he’s been so low on TD). But I think that’s where Johnson can help open things up…
by Ghetts on Aug 3, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then those are conflicting words. The main dig on Johnson last year was that his slot routes weren’t sharp enough, they weren’t crisp enough to gain seperation.
by Dyl on Aug 3, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From what I have read is he can get off the press coverage real quick and easy – don’t shoot the middle man! I don’t see him being the number 3 receiver this year or even next for that matter… I am just saying that I think in a couple years he will be the death of the Josh Reed era in Buffalo
by Ghetts on Aug 3, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is a difference in being able to escape press coverage off the line and running precise routes. running precise routes prevents you from being on the same page as the QB. In most cases the QB is throwing to a spot, if Johnson runs a bad route and is not at that “spot” then the pass is incomplete.
by gatornation on Aug 3, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is true, but most cornerbacks in the NFL are good enough, when escaped from, to jump back in and still defend or even intercept the ball if the route wasn’t run crisply and the ball wasn’t thrown at just the right time. Unless the route was a hook-and-go, you can get temporary seperation to no avail. Let’s hope in those cases that Johnson was the primary receiver and the timing was right on.
by Dyl on Aug 4, 2009 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Point
Not to mention he is young with tremendous upside.
by VanScottM on Aug 4, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s very possible that Reed could have his best statistical year and that would be a very welcome part of the offense. I still think TO and Evans will end up with more catches, but it’s hardly out of the question for Reed to end up winning that category. With Trent’s love for throwing underneath to him and how he’ll more than likely have more room to roam, he should have some rather productive games. He would have lead the team in receptions last year if he didn’t get hurt, so the precedent may be there.
What we need most out of him is to continue doing what he does best….block when asked to, catch the underneath passes, be a checkdown for Trent and convert as many first downs as he can. I still don’t expect many TD’s, but that’s not his role. We have TO, Evans, the RB’s, the TE’s and even Johnson/Hardy to pick up the slack there. If he can give us a 60 catch-600 yard season with a couple TD’s, that’ll be a great season.
The biggest question for Reed’s production is how often he’ll be on the field. TO and Evans will be out there as often as possible, but we still don’t know how much we’ll be using 3-WR sets and the no-huddle. If Reed is on the field for 50-60+% of offensive plays, I can see him having that nice statistical year. He’s definitely going to be the glue for the no-huddle offense, IMO.
Thanks for finally putting a Reed article out there, Brian. He’s one of the most underappreciated and unfairly ridiculed players on the team. He does his job well and I’m glad someone is giving him his due! Who knew that I’d be one of his biggest supporters over the years?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 3, 2009 12:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
block when asked to, catch the underneath passes, be a checkdown for Trent and convert as many first downs as he can
couldn’t agree more with this – that’s all I hope for out of him and think if he does this while adding 3-4 TD’s then he’ll be very good for us this year.
I am so clever that sometimes I don’t understand a single word of what I am saying
by J2 on Aug 3, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good read...
agree with K on a lot. Would add more, but I’m starting the daunting task of trying to play catch-up on content today!!
John I.
by jri111 on Aug 3, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
HAHA
Good luck with that! You picked the wrong week to try to catch up on! Brian was a machine the last 10 days or so.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 3, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just because he’s playing the role he’s meant to play in the league doesn’t mean he’s going to put up career numbers. Barring injury to Owens or Evans, I’d be shocked if he got to 60 catches.
He’s still a very underappreciated asset, but statistically speaking, his numbers aren’t likely to go up at all in my opinion. Ricky Proehl was no less valuable a player when he played with Bruce/Holt and Muhammad/Smith, but for the most part his numbers dropped off when he was there.
Reed could drop off to 45 catches and still make the desired impact.
by Make a play Whitner on Aug 3, 2009 12:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
top 5 wr threat in the league
i think with the addition of TO that buffalo now has a top 5 group as far as the wide outs go.
by jaybird3232 on Aug 3, 2009 12:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Depends on who the fourth receiver is
We have the potential to make it so. Yet all the great receiver tandems are at least four deep…while Steve Johnson and Roscoe Parrish are barely noteworthy.
by Dyl on Aug 3, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Steve Johnson
will make this post look ridiculous. He’s gonna be force to be delt w/ sooner rather than later. I can easily see him seeing more time than last years #2 draft pick – James Hardy, unless Hardy can finally get “IT”. I realize he’s got an MCL to deal w/ at the moment, and he’s just now entering his 2nd year, but from what I’ve seen from him, he’s not aggressive, and certainly doesn’t know how to utilize that huge frame of his to physically beat out defenders. He needs to start watching T.O.’s form on a daily basis to learn how to use his body.
Steve Johnson WILL be noteworthy, trust me. He’s a player!
Roscoe as WR? Well, not much to add there. I believe the staff is doing all they can to get the ball in Roscoe’s hands in the Wildcat. After the draft, I was even thinking he could be the odd man out in the WR corp ESPECIALLY due to Steve Johnson!!!
Season Ticket Holder Sec: 312, Row: 15
"There's NO place like home when it's the Big Tree Inn"
by Pocono Bob on Aug 3, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hardy certainly was slow to develop last season. I was never really clear as to why the team didn’t have him run to a spot and be tall. HIs one handed TD grab showed why the Bills picked him; he’s got an enormous wing span and will require double coverage in the red zone once he hits his stride….leaving one less guy in the box for Lynch to plow through on the way to the paint.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Aug 3, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nice article Brian
I asked for more specifics yesterday on why you think Reed could catch more than TO and Evans and I get a whole article!
The only problem I have believing that Reed will catch more balls than TO and Evans is that his nice pace from last year, when K noted he would have had more than Evans, is not the same role he will have this year. If what we are seeing at camp is any indication, TO is going to gobble up passes. Evans just got a deal and Edwards will not want to upset such a good target, he will be looking for him as well. Stevie J needs to get increased reps so we don’t waste his potential and I bet Shawn Nelson lines up as a third or fourth receiver in some packages with Stevie J near the goal line or other situations.
I’m betting Josh Reed has some monster games throughout the year and then downers. 50 catches is probable, but I don’t see TO or Lee Evans dipping below 65.
Guards Brad Butler and Brandon Rodd are decent. - Pete Prisco
Brandon Rodd!! Our best player.
by poz on Aug 3, 2009 2:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Evans and Owens will draw their CBs and possibly both safeties on just about every play. (If either is singled up on a DB we know where Trent is going with the ball.) Reed will be left one-on-one with either a nickle CB or a LB so he should be able to win most of those battles. Throw in the facts that Edwards likes to throw short and that defenses will blitz heavily to minimize the damage Evans/Owens can do and it’s easy to see that Reed will have every opportunity for a career season.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Aug 3, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could very, very easily see Evans dip well below 65 and maybe even below 50.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 3, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reed is what he is a tough hard nose slot receiver that will run the crossing routes , curls, provide exceptional down field blocking and do the dirty work. Yes, he has dropped passes early in his career but what WR hasn’t, the positive is he has gotten better in that department.
The player that could be in for a career year is Roscoe. If the Bills go to the no huddle and having Evans and TO on the outside the opposing defenses will have to double team one if not both. Parrish should draw a mismatch in coverage. Maybe with Evans, TO and Parrish on the field it will bring back memories of Reed, Loften and Beebe….
by Goose22 on Aug 3, 2009 4:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i can see Roscoe breaking out
I like that call.
Guards Brad Butler and Brandon Rodd are decent. - Pete Prisco
Brandon Rodd!! Our best player.
by poz on Aug 3, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless Roscoe has been breaking open against our first rep defenses I don’t see this happening… Roscoe isn’t as good of a receiver as Reed – he’s not consistent enough to keep on the field for a no huddle…
by Ghetts on Aug 3, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But why would Roscoe be on the field? They have been splitting out Schouman and Nelson. They have been going 3 WRs with Owens, Lee, and Roscoe. They have been splitting out Jackson a lot too. I just haven’t seen Roscoe on the field all that much on the offensive side of the ball in camp. At least not with the first team. He has been running Wildcat. That’s it. And he ran a reverse yesterday.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 4, 2009 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the feedback from camp. Roscoe is an elite return specialist but now it is his time to put up or shut up at the WR slot.
by Goose22 on Aug 4, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Josh Reed need 18 receptions to move to number 5 in the Bills all time list, assuming Lee Evens gets more catches than Reed, number 4 otherwise. This would leave him trailing Andre Reed, Eric Mould and Thurman Thomas three of the Bills greatest receivers. I think this is not bad going for anyone.
If you look at his career stats the only part that is disappointing is the number of TDs, quite an important stat i grant you, but he has been a good player for us and i think this year he will have another great year for a slot receiver.
Football. Bloody Hell!!
by gregeng on Aug 3, 2009 4:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Reed was asked to do way too much in past season regarding his skill set. I’m really looking farward to seeing him conect in the slot. Combining him with TO and Evans gives us a very promissing year.
Captain of the "Promote Bob Sanders to Deffensive Coordinator" band wagon.
by CanadianBillsFan on Aug 4, 2009 6:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 























