Notes from the Bills' O-Line: at Pittsburgh Steelers
I followed the Buffalo Bills' 17-0 loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers live on NFL.com and got onto a streaming feed fairly early in the game. Like most of you, I was completely dismayed by the offense in general, and Trent Edwards in particular. The game was just rebroadcast on NFL Network and I've made it through the drives in which the starters played. I was actually surprised by some of the things I learned going through the game, and will point them out as I go.
Pass 1 Parrish for 4 yards
Walker handled a bull rush by 92 with relative ease.
Levitre hand fought with 99.
Hang and Wood doubled 91.
Butler was pushed back uncomfortably close to Edwards by 54.
This play was notable in that no Steeler turned his head away from the line of scrimmage (LOS). They weren't at all worried about anything over about 15 yards. It would seem that they have heard of the ‘Checkwards' part of Edwards new nickname.
Run 1 Lynch 1 yard through the right C gap
Walker stood up 92 and neither man got any push.
Levitre stepped forward to seal 99 off from the intended rush lane and then went a bit further and hit 91, who was by that point all the way across the formation though not of his own will.
Hang got an initial pop on 99, tried to pull to lead the play and fell down.
Wood and Butler blew 91 5 yards off the LOS at which point Wood peeled off to hit 51 and drive him 5 more yards.
Schouman was driven into the running lane that Lynch intended to use by 56.
Even with Hang falling down, Lynch would have had more room to run in what certainly looked like the intended run lane-off to the left instead of off to the right where he chose to go.
Pass 2 INC to Parrish
Walker and 92 had what appeared to be a mutual takedown, which could well have drawn a flag for Walker but didn't.
Levitre kept 99 on an outside circle and away from the QB.
Hang and Wood doubled 91 and kept him from elevating.
Lynch chipped 54 for Butler and Butler held his own for the rest of the play.
26 was sitting on the route and knocked the ball down. I give Edwards credit, yes credit, for trying to jam the ball into Parrish for a first down. He could have dumped it to Lynch for a minimal gain but 94 was in the area so there was virtually no chance for a first down. The throw to Parrish was almost impossible to make but it was the best of the available options.
Blitz: 0
Stacked drive: 0
Killed by: Edwards' inability to jam the ball into a tiny, tiny window.
Drive 2
Run 2 Lynch 2 yard through the left B gap
Walker was pushed back by 99, who disengaged and then made the tackle.
Levitre went to the 2nd level and helped Hang put 98 down.
Hang got a 3 yard drive on 98!!!!!! (Yes, it feels great to type that a Bills center got any drive at all on a DT.)
Wood went to the 2nd level and danced with 94.
Butler bulldogged 91 to the ground and it looked like good technique, not a hold.
Schouman did a terrific job on 92 while Nelson came all the way across the formation to stand around and chat with 56 after it was all over but the shouting.
Run 3 Lynch 16 yards through the right C gap
Walker was immediately beaten to the inside by 99.
Levitre went to the 2nd level and locked up 94 but let him turn. With Levitre's hands on 94's waist from behind it looked like a hold.
Hang got some push on 98, not much but he wasn't driven back a la Fowler/Preston.
Wood tried to help Hang with 98 and Butler with 91 but didn't do much for either cause.
Butler turned 91 inside giving Lynch the outside lane. He also inadvertently caught 99 up in the wash, covering Walker's mistake.
Nelson did a decent job on 92, sticking with him and slowing him down as he tried to chase the play.
Schouman did a very good job on 56, not letting him turn or disengage.
Pass 3 Schouman for 6 yards
Walker stoned 99.
Levitre and Hang doubled 98
Wood was bull rushed by 91, almost to Edwards.
Butler gave up a little ground to 56 and then hand fought with him.
Reed was open near the sideline for a 6 yard pickup as well though I like that Edwards stuck with his initial read for the quick gain to Schouman.
Run 4 Lynch for no gain through the left B gap against and 8 man front
Walker got a slight push on 99 and turned him away from the running lane.
Levitre went to the 2nd level and completely missed 51.
Hang got a 2 yard push on 98. (Woo Hoo!!!)
Wood went to the 2nd level and was promptly destroyed by 94.
Butler put 91 down, again using what appeared to be good technique and not a hold.
Nelson did an okay job on 56 all the way across the formation.
Schouman did a so-so job on 92, keeping him out of the play but also getting flattened in the process.
Pass 4 INC to Parrish
Walker simply dominated 92.
Levitre and Hang doubled 99. Levitre gave 92 an unneeded shove.
Wood forced 91 to circle all the way around Butler and 54, keeping him out of the play.
Butler was bull rushed to Edwards by 54, causing Edwards' errant throw and killing the drive.
Blitz: 0
Stacked box: 1
Drive killed by: Butler, or more accurately the back of his shoulder and helmet
Drive 3
Pass 5 INT returned for touchdown
Walker had a grievous hold and takedown on 92, so even if the play had been an INC or positive one for Buffalo, Walker still would have killed it.
Levitre and Hang doubled 99.
Wood stuffed a bull rush by 98.
Butler stopped 56 cold.
When I watched it on the stream Saturday night, I wasn't sure but it looked like Reed slowed down about halfway across the field. On TV it's clear that he did. He didn't stop for a hole in a zone, he simply slowed down. That makes me suspect that Edwards thought Reed was going to continue full steam ahead all the way across the formation. I'm pinning this one on Reed.
Blitz: 0
Stacked box: 0
Drive killed by: Reed slowing down his route, which lead to the INT.
Drive 4
Run 5 Rhodes for 1 yard through the left C gap against an 8 man front
Walker got some push on 99 before Walker's legs were cut out from under him.
Levitre went to the 2nd level and popped 51 but didn't stay with him, though it did keep 51 out of the play.
Hang was driven back by 98 (D'oh!), who made the tackle.
Wood went to the 2nd level and dogged 94, keeping him 10 yards from the play.
91 jumped inside of Butler but Butler stuck with him and eventually got him down.
Nelson held his ground against 92 at the point of attack (POA).
Schouman kept 43 out of the play but then 43 knew his help wasn't needed.
Pass 6 Rhodes for 1 yard
Walker and Levitre doubled 99 when 92 dropped into zone coverage. When 99 tried to elevate Walker unceremoniously threw him down.
Hang, Wood and Butler did a terrific job of stopping 98, 91 and 56 cold as they tried twisting and stunting. It was great job of non-verbal communication.
Edwards had more time to throw but was clearly on a 3 second mental clock.
Pass 7 INC to Reed
Walker stuffed 99 when 92 stunted to the inside.
Levitre and Hang picked up 92 when he tried to stunt inside.
Wood stopped 91.
Butler didn't let 56 get anywhere near Edwards.
There really didn't seem to be any reason for such a poorly thrown ball by Edwards.
Blitz: 0
Stacked box: 1
Drive killed by: Edwards' terrible throw.
Drive 5
Run 6 Rhodes for 3 yards through the A gap (defense offsides)
Walker and Levitre blew 99 8 yards off the LOS and took 94 along for the ride when he got caught up in the wash.
Hang turned 98 and pushed him past the hole.
Wood chipped 98 then hit 51 as he tried to fill.
Butler kept 56 on the outside and away from the play.
Schouman couldn't sustain his block on 92, who got inside of him to make the tackle.
Run 7 Parrish 7 yards through the left C-gap (reverse)
Walker sealed 51 inside.
Levitre and Hang doubled 99 and pushed him to the right.
Wood stood ground versus 92 and kept blocking him as the play flowed back to the left.
Butler let 56 go upfield and went to find someone else to hit.
The play depended entirely on 92 not staying home. He fell for Edwards' excellent play fake and went to tackle Rhodes only to find out too late that Rhodes wasn't the ball carrier.
Run 8 Rhodes 2 yards through the right B gap
Walker made a miserable attempt at cutting 92, who wasn't even slowed down.
Levitre pulled to lead the play. He hit 94 in the hole but 94 still made the tackle.
Hang got a 2 yard push on 99. (Woo Hoo!!!!)
Wood got a slow, grinding 1 yard push on 98.
Butler chipped 98 and then locked onto 51 and kept him out of the play.
Schouman was outwrestled by 56 at the POA.
Pass 8 16 yards to Rhodes
Walker was close to a hold on 92; it could have drawn a flag but shouldn't have.
Levitre and Hang and Wood shut down 91 and 99 as they twisted; again, good teamwork.
Butler almost let 56 get around him but kept under 56's right shoulder pads to keep him off Edwards.
Pass 9 INC due to pressure against a 5 man blitz
Walker was beaten to the corner by 92.
Levitre stoned 56.
Hang stopped 90.
Wood and Butler doubled 99.
Rhodes failed to pick up 51 on a blitz-he saw him and was in position but just didn't execute the block. Evans was wide open for about a 17 yard gain even if he didn't get another foot of yardage after the completion....which he likely would have.
Pass 10 INC to Reed
It seemed that the line knew that Edwards was going to throw the ball immediately as none of them really put in much effort-just quick pops. It may have been called that way or it may have been that the line recognized that a pass play with the DBs 10 yards off the LOS was going to be a quick pass to the WR. Schouman clearly knew what it was because he immediately pitched into 51 and put him down so he couldn't block the pass. It was just a terrible pass by Edwards.
Pass 11 sack against a 5 man blitz
Walker locked up 92 and rode him around on a circle.
Levitre danced with 91 well away from Edwards.
Hang and Wood doubled 99, put him down and laid on him.
Butler battled 56 all over the field.
Rhodes, for the second time in 3 plays failed to pick up a blitzer. Once again, he clearly recognized the blitz and was in position to stop the sack. Once again he failed.
Blitz: 2
Stacked box: 0
Drive killed by: Rhodes and his terrible blitz pick up
Drive 6
Pass 12 Rhodes for no gain
Walker rode 92 inside but couldn't stay with him as he spun back to the outside to pressure Edwards.
Levitre popped 99 and waited for him behind the LOS to re-engage.
Hang had no one to block so he waited for a blitzer.
Wood took 96 from Butler and put him down.
Butler took on 51 after passing 96 to Wood (good communication) and put him down.
Blitz: 0
Stacked box: 0
Drive killed by: half (Yes, I was pissed they didn't let Edwards air it out but that wasn't his call.)
Drive 7
Run 9 Omon 2 yards through the A gap against an 8 man front
Walker ran out to the edge and hit 43, keeping him out of the play.
Levitre had no one to block and failed to keep his head on a swivel. He didn't see 91 cut in behind him to make the tackle.
Hang chipped 98 and went to the 2nd level. He then ran a circle around 94 without stopping him. Very strange.
Wood successfully cut 98!!!!! (Yes, I'm very excited to see a Bills lineman actually cut a defender.)
Butler jumped inside of 91 but didn't slow him down.
Schouman tried to lock up 99 but settled for pushing him in the back.
Nelson did a great job locking up 92, driving him and then putting him on his back.
Pass 13 Omon 4 yards against a 5 man blitz
Walker stuffed 99.
Levitre had no one to block so he waited for a blitzer or a stunt.
Hang hand fought with 98.
Wood rode 91 in a circle to the inside.
Butler locked up 56 and kept him well away from Edwards.
Edwards had 4+ seconds to throw. He had two hitches before rolling out and throwing to Omon. It looked like he was trying to throw to Nelson crossing over the middle but Nelson never turned his head to look at Edwards.
Pass 14 INC against a 5 man blitz
Walker aggressively hit 99 on the line and kept him there.
Levitre hit a DT as he came on a delayed rush.
Hang and Wood doubled 91. Hang helped out Levitre with 99 and Wood put 91 down.
Butler rode 95 in a circle all the way around Edwards.
Omon had a pathetic block attempt on a blitzing LB, who sacked Edwards and killed the drive. As with Rhodes, he saw the blitzer and was in position but just half-assed the block.
Blitz: 2
Stacked box: 1
Drive killed by: Omon and his inability to actually slow down a blitzer.
Here's the chart:
Run Pass
Player good decent bad killed good decent bad killed sack
Walker 1 5 3 0 1 10 3 1 0
Levitre 1 4 4 0 0 14 0 0 0
Hang 3 4 2 0 1 13 0 0 0
Wood 2 6 1 0 3 11 0 0 0
Butler 3 5 1 0 1 12 1 0 0
I actually feel better about Edwards now than I did before. No, I'm not saying that I'm on the currently empty Edwards bandwagon. I am, however, saying that he did try to get the ball down the field on a couple of occasions; in both cases he was thwarted by poor blocking (Butler and Rhodes). The ugly INT returned for a TD may not be as clear cut as we had thought given that Reed slowed down on his route. Edwards threw to where he thought Reed would be since Reed was running full speed when the ball was thrown. It could have been miscommunication (Reed thinking the ball wasn't coming to him or that he should slow down and find a hole in the zone) or it could have been that Reed didn't feel like getting whacked by 51 the moment his hands touched the ball. (We've seen Reed cower-in Jacksonville--before when the reception would have been meaningless and the hit vicious.)
I feel quite a bit better about the pass protection overall. First, where everyone had mistakes against the Bears only Butler (1) and Walker (3) had mistakes against the Steelers. Further, the line appeared to be able to handle more than just straight ahead rushes this week. Only once did a linemen have a bad play against a blitz (Walker) and that didn't kill the play-Rhodes' poor blitz pick up did. The line appeared to work better as a unit, passing guys off with seeming ease. While the Steelers didn't uncork their entire slate of blitzes the fact that Buffalo was able to handle the basic pass rushes common to the 3-4 was encouraging.
While the run blocking still needs work the Bills did average 4.2 yards per attempt. As you might have noticed above, I was delighted to see Hang get some drive on 3-4 DTs. He was only driven back once, which is a major improvement over what we've seen for the past couple of years. I also noted with glee that Wood was able to cut a defender, something the line has lacked for a long time.
The 4.2 yards per attempt would have been a touch higher had the TEs done a little better in some of their assignments. On the topic of TEs, by the way, Nelson seems to be coming along as a blocker-so much so that the team left him alone with the 2008 Defensive Player Of The Year on a couple of plays.
Both Rhodes and Omon were real disappointments in pass protection. I don't know that I want either of them on the field when the Bills face the Patriots on Monday Night Football. They both failed miserably in their assignments and they each killed a drive. (Rhodes took two cracks at killing the drive he did kill.)
15 recs |
32 comments
|
Comments
You've helped to talk me back from the edge!
What I thought was a piece of the sky landing on my head turned out to be harmless.
Rec’d!
I'll donate $1 to help Mary Wilson pay the estate tax...who's with me?!?
by O.J. Is My Bodyguard on Aug 30, 2009 6:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t go that far…it’s just not as abjectly terrible as it seemed at first blush. It’s still pretty bad any way you slice it.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Aug 30, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nearly same here
but sadly, I am writing this from the grave….
but seriously, thanks for making me feel a bit better. I only watched at work and ran around swearing all night
The Bills CAN win any game
by killascript on Aug 30, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed about the Reed INT
I just started watching the first half. The backfield camera replay shows Reed not even looking for the ball until it is caught by #51. But, pressure from #92, who Walker held could have lead to Edwards making the throw too early. I give partial credit to Walker for that INT.
"When troops flee, are insubordinate, collapse, or are routed in battle, it is the fault of the general." – Sun Tzu. Yes Jauron, I am talking to you.
by Joe P. on Aug 30, 2009 6:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree on the INT too. If Reed knows that pass is coming, it’s probably a harmless incompletion.
by kaisertown on Aug 30, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It wouldn’t have been harmeless for Reed. 51 would have tattooed him.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Aug 30, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, and while I agree its preseason it doesn't bode well for the regular season if he will alligator arm or slow down on these passes
We need Reed working the middle of the field with our horses to the outside, we HAVE to have him there to make those intermediate area catches.
(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T
-textsfromlastnight.com
by WABillsfan on Aug 31, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m surprised that people were really worried about Hang. I’ve got more faith in him than any other player on the line.
And I’m still clueless as to why anyone on the Bills’ staff actually thought that moving Walker to LT wasn’t a bad idea.
This is great work, as always.
by kaisertown on Aug 30, 2009 7:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Validity?
And I’m still clueless as to why anyone on the Bills’ staff actually thought that moving Walker to LT wasn’t a bad idea.
Smoke and mirrors perhaps….but competition is always good, I just don’t like hearing that coaches are at odds.
I wonder if the firsts get more than a series against Detroit so to get some rhythm
The Bills CAN win any game
by killascript on Aug 30, 2009 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I wonder if the firsts get more than a series against Detroit so to get some rhythm
I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that they have proved that they are NOT ready to play NE and that some extra time vs DET is sadly needed.
I'll donate $1 to help Mary Wilson pay the estate tax...who's with me?!?
by O.J. Is My Bodyguard on Aug 30, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but competition is always good
If only they had some competition for the position or other positions on the line…Maybe they’d have someone actually win a starting job!!!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 30, 2009 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Outside Walker, are you disagreeing that our four best linemen are at the other four positions?
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know about Levtire, but the other 3 are.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK. I agree competition is good. But I don’t think the guys aren’t performing because there is no competition. I think they are all doing a decent job and Ron’s breakdown says about the same thing. Walker could be doing better but everyone else is stepping up.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you Ron, great work once again
I am ecstatic to see that Levitre/Hang/Wood & Butler are gelling. I am really happy to see how good Wood & Hangman are doing.
I agree with you, the INT was Reed’s fault for slowing down, I almost threw my bottle of beer through the Plasma screen when it happened, it clear was Reed that slowed down. Still, Edwards footwork looked horrible all evening, he looked out of it and the errant throws confirmed it.
Again, great job and I can tell you that I look forward to your breakdowns each week.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Aug 30, 2009 8:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great job as always Ron!!!
this alone has made me feel better about the game, minus the goose egg on the scoreboard. At least it seems are line is starting to gel and actually have talent. Now we just need Owens back, and the production lies with Trent.
Rec’d
How many years can we go without making the playoffs...eventually the odds go in your favor.........right?!?!?
by Rudy916 on Aug 30, 2009 8:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great writeup as always, Ron
I think everyone needed to hear this after the game last night.
by Mark Parisi on Aug 30, 2009 9:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ron, I think I speak for everyone when I say I your breakdown is one of the prominent reasons I check back to this wonderfull page so often. Please keep them coming. I def feel better know. For better or worse this offense has been built around TO and they need him healthy.
by Jay Mayne on Aug 30, 2009 11:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Speaking just for myself, I check in for Brian’s postings and the comments sections.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Aug 30, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am glad
that the line is starting to gel. I am worried about our receivers getting open and our running back pick up of blitzers. New England will do that all day if we do not fix that. I hope that the o-line plays the first quarter at least on thursday. I love that Nelson is showing his blocking skills. He is a wapon and the more he is on the field the more we can use him.
Fat, Drunk, & Stupid is No way to go through life.
by Deadpool71 on Aug 30, 2009 11:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Way to polish that turd Ron.........
nice break down!
Godspeed Nick - RIP - 1986-2009
by norcaliangelsfan on Aug 30, 2009 11:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ahahaha
yea. now its not so steamy!
by silverstreak3k on Aug 31, 2009 2:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So in the end, our QB looked bad, our WRs seemed to not being doing what they should have been doing
And our RB’s were playing Patty-Cake with the blitzers when they should have been playing at a minimum Bloody-Knuckles.
I am very relieved though to hear that Hang is able to stuff and move 3-4NTs, that makes me feel much better and Hampton is not a joke there. The line as a whole seems to have played well together and were communicating which is the big thing. I have a better feeling about this new oline, and I really hope they give them a quarter next game to really solidfy their work together before squaring off against the Pats on MNF.
(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T
-textsfromlastnight.com
by WABillsfan on Aug 31, 2009 12:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So the O line seems to be moving in the right direction
but maybe our depth at WR and RB is not quite what we thought.
"When Manchester United are at their best I am close to orgasm!" Gianluca Vialli
"I wouldn't ever set out to hurt anyone deliberately unless it was, you know, important - like a league game or something." Dick Butkus
by gregeng on Aug 31, 2009 4:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No, the RB depth isn’t what we thought. Rhodes should be reasonably capable when it comes to picking up blitzers. I don’t recall him letting Manning get smoked.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Aug 31, 2009 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, he didn’t – he was always a capable blocker (which is why I was happy the Bills brought him in), who knows if he is just p@ssed at the fact that he isn’t going to start at all.
I am glad though that Jackson will be in for the majority of plays anyways ( I don’t know much about his blocking skills) but I at least know he will fight for every inch.
Who remembers the TD Lynch scored last year when Freddy led the way and dominated in his block?
by Ghetts on Aug 31, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great work as always, and formatting each lineman to an individual line is a help to read for me.
And the table at the end is really nice to see.
by Pistol on Aug 31, 2009 9:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I also like the table at the end
I’m always excited to see it. It helps really visualize a comparison. Before I saw the aggregate table I thought Butler was doing quite poorly.
by Dyl on Aug 31, 2009 9:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Edwards clearly the problem
Having watched the pre-season this far, I noticed a couple things:
1. The running game is improved from last year. The team seems to be able to pick up 4+ yards per carry and while improvement is still needed, the offensive line is blocking reasonably well on running plays.
2. The problems this team has with 3-4 defenses falls on the shoulders of trent edwards. Edwards clearly does not know what to do with that extra guy in the backfield. My problem all along with Edwards is that he is afraid to throw the ball beyond 7 yards unless the player is WIDE open. He at least tried to force a couple in this time around but until he can see those tiny NFL style openings, he is going to continue to struggle. The offensive line blocked acceptably well for Edwards in this game. A few pressures are to be expected (hey the Steelers were the #1 defense last year)
3. With TO in the game the Receivers all looked better. TO (whom I personally believe does not and never did have a toe injury, a very very minor one if anything) will make a huge impact on the passing game. Edwards looked in practice like he was able to put faith in TO to come down with the ball in a really tight situation and TO is also able to get WIDE open pretty often which Trent needs. (TO doesn’t really need pre-season games at this point in his career, he came into the HOF game and caught two passes for 26 yards in one drive. Then his mysterious, untraceable toe injury happened. The Toe injury seems to have cleared up just in time for the last pre-season game where TO will likely play one series if at all. He conveniently missed the 3 games where the starters see some time. You’ll notice that while Jauron has said the politically correct things in interviews, he doesn’t seem worried at all about his top free agent receiver being “injured”. Lots of veteran players have been known to do things like this during the preseason. I don’t think that Jauron minds, it gives him more opportunities to look at his receiver depth in these preseason games. Parrish for example seems to have solidified the fact that he is an unreliable target. There was never any real need to see how TO is coming along and never any chance that he would be cut.)
by Polish Lover on Aug 31, 2009 10:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just a side note……… the running game last season was pretty solid. Both Jackson and Lynch averaged over 4 yards per carry.
Are we drafting Dino's now?
"6'6" monster receiver with a Terradactyl wingspan "....... Keysh67
by Billsfanstuckinthesouth on Aug 31, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My problem all along with Edwards is that he is afraid to throw the ball beyond 7 yards unless the player is WIDE open
Agreed.
He needs to be able to anticipate better because so far this year by the time he throws the receiver is already waiting for it. Is it just me or do they also seem to be throwing a lot of hooks, which lack the YACs? I want to see Trent trust his judgment and throw with some level of anticipatioon, let the receiver make a play for you buddy. That being said, the INT in the Steelers game was clearly a Chicken Reed play, he slowed down, which caused the INT. He probably was affraid of the big hit that would have followed. But this is the kind of anticipation I’m talking about, hit your receivers in full stride.
I agree that TO makes everyone better but so would Steve Johnson as WR2. Why the coaching staff chose not to start him with the first team is beyond me.
Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!
by keysh67 on Sep 1, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs























