Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods, Tony Romo Grouped Together At Pebble Beach

How disposed to change are these Bills?

Things are not well in Buffalo Bills nation.  The team's first-string offense has been shut out in two consecutive pre-season games.  Trent Edwards, 46.9 quarterback rating in tow, is captaining a bandwagon whose passengers are dropping like flies.  The offensive line is making some progress, but as expected, they're still working on playing together.  Without Terrell Owens, Buffalo's receivers have struggled to get going.  While the defense and special teams - though inconsistent - have shown far more signs of life, the offense, or lack thereof, has Bills fans (and even coaches) worried.

It's so bad that, over the weekend, two separate reports surfaced that indicate that the franchise is already contemplating changes in two key areas.

ESPN.com's Tim Graham reported last Friday that part of the coaching staff - offensive coordinator Turk Schonert chief among them - are pushing to start second-year prospect Demetrius Bell at left tackle in lieu of veteran Langston Walker.  Now, Schonert himself has been named as a coordinator on the hot seat by the National Football Post; according to the blurb, the "patience level" for Schonert to turn the offense around is not high.

We're talking about a team that, historically, has not made big changes such as these in the past, particularly before or during the start of a regular season.  Then again, we've seen how desperate they've become by the mere free agent signing of Owens alone.  Where's the line? How much will the current regime contemplate changing to save their jobs?

Star-divide

If these changes happen, will they help?
Swapping out Walker for Bell is, at the very least, intriguing.  Bell has the look of a diamond-in-the-rough type player, with excellent athleticism.  This coaching staff raves about what he could be - but they've also been hesitant to rave about what he currently is.  Starting him over Walker would be a gamble, regardless of how poorly Walker has apparently played.  (It's time to put to rest the notion that the move would re-shuffle the line, as well; Brad Butler would stay at right tackle, folks, as would the interior of the offensive line.  If the swap is made, Walker assumes Bell's spot on the bench.)

Removing Schonert is a move I feel certain most Bills fans would not regret, but who replaces him? I firmly believe that the plan all along has been to allow Edwards to call his own plays in the no-huddle offense, but considering his performance of late, it's not a stretch to believe that might have changed.  If patience is thin based on Schonert's play-calling this pre-season and throughout the 2008 season, that's certainly understandable - but who replaces him? Eric Studesville is currently the running backs coach and running game coordinator, but he has no play-calling experience at this level.  Nor does quarterbacks coach Alex Van Pelt or receivers coach Tyke Tolbert.  (Of course, neither did Schonert when he was hired.)

It's important to remember that these changes have not been made.  The fact that the reports even exist, however, is indicative of the desperation surrounding this team.  There's nothing wrong with being desperate to win - but these are scary changes to be contemplating this close to the start of the season.

Breaking down assumptions
There are other items that are routinely dropped in discussions as a paraphrase of "things Dick Jauron always does."  A few are below.

Edwards.  Buffalo didn't go out into the free agent market and bring in Ryan Fitzpatrick to open a quarterback competition.  Jauron has settled on Edwards as his starter, and after the wishy-washy decision-making at quarterback of previous Bills coaches like Wade Phillips (Doug Flutie/Rob Johnson) and Mike Mularkey (J.P. Losman/Kelly Holcomb), that's commendable.  But if Edwards keep playing as he's been playing this pre-season, the team isn't going anywhere.  No matter how confident Jauron and his staff is that Edwards can develop into a good player, is it really safe to say that they wouldn't make a switch to try to ignite the offense? (Not now, obviously; Edwards is still firmly entrenched as the starter.)

Cutting veterans.  The Bills have some roster decisions to make over the next week or so as NFL rules mandate cutting down rosters to 53 players by this coming Saturday.  Some select veterans - such as Walker, as well as defensive ends Chris Kelsay and Ryan Denney - are considered locks to make the team.  But in the case of all of those players, there are younger, less-developed players that could help the team win games, even if they're prone to more mistakes.  Who's to say the coaches won't cut some vets (and some salary) and roll the dice with younger, more talented players?

Giving away playing time. Josh ReedRoscoe ParrishDerek SchoumanDerek Fine.  Kelsay and Denney.  Donte Whitner.  All are nice players, and all have roles to play.  Most will see significant playing time.  But would it truly shock us if, after a few weeks of terrible offense, Steve Johnson takes reps in the slot? Or Shawn Nelson gets top reps at tight end? How about Aaron Maybin becoming a full-time starter? Is it possible that they'd use Whitner as a jack-of-all-trades to get Jairus Byrd onto the field full-time? They've got to get playmakers onto the field if they want to win games, and none of the aforementioned, with the possible exception of Parrish, have routinely turned in game-changing plays.

Is it time to throw assumptions out the window? This is more a speculative post than anything - I realize y'all would rather just bash the coaching staff and the quarterback, but we can get a little more creative with this.  How much change do you believe is possible, starting now and getting into the season, from this desperate franchise?

Comment 116 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

As much as I’d like to see the younger DE prospects retained at the expense of guys like Denney and Kelsay who have clearly maxed out their potential, I don’t see salary being a part of the equation at all. The Bills are under the cap for 2009, which will be Jauron’s last year ever as an NFL head coach if the team doesn’t win. Why would he even begin to care about cap ramifications for 2010 (and beyond) at this point?

Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner

by Ron From NM on Aug 31, 2009 8:42 AM EDT reply actions  

It’s a solid point but the same “cap casualty” guys could get cut just for the upside a guy like Ellis brings. We know what we have in both of them now but one has maxed out, give the new kid a shot. It’s the way of the salary cap NFL regardless of who is coaching and how long they will be around.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think salary will be part of the equation, and I still think we could see Denney cut.

by Pistol on Aug 31, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Because the front office shouldn’t let the future get mismanaged because Jauron needs to keep some guys around to go for another 7-9 season. If they do, they can take the same train out of town.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Schonert
Now, Schonert himself has been named as a coordinator on the hot seat by the National Football Post; according to the blurb, the “patience level” for Schonert to turn the offense around is not high.

If the patience level with Schonert is so low now, before they even played a regular season game in 2009, why even keep him around at the end of the ’08 season? Schonert should have been gone in February, not two weeks before the season begins in September. Amature hour at One Bills Drive.

John I.

by jri111 on Aug 31, 2009 8:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Nowhere in the article does it say he will be replaced. :-) I think patience around here is wearing pretty thin, don’t you?

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Schonert was a bad hire from the get go. The Bills were simply not at a point that they could give someone with zero coordinator experience the necessary time to grow into this position. We’ve all heard the pros and cons about hiring internally, but we’re witnessing the biggest “con” right now. Had he shown himself to be significantly better than Fairchild would there be a shift to the no huddle? Not likely. The change to no-huddle IMO was essentially done to cover the basic mistake of hiring Turk in the first place. Ooops! Time to dance with the one that brought you

by Zumone on Aug 31, 2009 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well he is better than Fairchild. I’ve gone over that before. But that’s like calling yourself the thinnest fat guy. Turk wanted to run the no huddle last year reportedly as a first year coordinator. He ran it as a QB in Cincy so it makes sense. It’s not a gimmick to cover his butt.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

On the contrary, in my view Schonert is the gem of the coaching staff. If you don’t like his playcalls remember that he is extremely limited in what he can do by the problems with the o-line. Also, Trent seems to change the play almost half the time these days according to what he and Schoert have been saying postgame.

What’s happening right now appears to be a rift between Schonert and line coach Sean Kugler. Clearly someone leaked the info that Schonert wants Bell to start to Tim Graham of ESPN. Who did it? Either Schonert, or Alex van Pelt acting on behalf of Schonert. Why did they do it? The answer is obvious: to put pressure on Jauron to make the change. That suggests that Jauron has been resistant to doing anything, in effect siding with Kugler (Jauron is excessively reluctant to undercut any of his coaches, even if the team’s whole season is at stake). I think Schonert deserves great credit for this. My guess is that he also wants to put Walker back at RT (that would be the smart thing to do, and Schoert and van Pelt are nothing if not smart) , but he is taking things one step at a time, starting with getting Bell in at LT.

I am also much more confident about Bell’s ability to handle LT as a result of this news. Schonert (whose career is riding on the success of this offense) must have been looking at the film carefully and decided on that basis that Bell would be a significant upgrade over Walker. Now that everything is out in the open, let’s hope that it happens, and soon.

by Macktruck on Aug 31, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

uh…what?

So Schonert leaks something to Tim Graham in order to pressure Jauron into starting Bell? And you are giving him credit for some hypothetical?

I guess I don’t follow this….

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

There’s no other way it would have happened if Schonert or van Pelt didn’t leak it (or want it leaked). Jauron didn’t do it, and Kugler surely didn’t. It’s how leaks happen — someone is trying to further a position.

by Macktruck on Aug 31, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sending this reminder: It’s PRE-season.

HAHAHA. Chris Mortenson to all the fans up in arms…

As for the article, I would still be surprised if Bell starts on opening night between his injury and the Patriots being the team we face. I never thought he would play this season unless Walker broke down which he hasn’t.

Personally, I think the fans are much more upset than the staff. They know what they have to fix and how to go about doing it.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 8:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Really?
They know what they have to fix and how to go about doing it.

Not sure I agree with the second part of this statement. No evidence to suggest they know how.

The Dick Jauron version of the K-Gun...the Squirt Gun.

by ChipShot on Aug 31, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

WR

I thought this precisely…that having Parrish out there with the first team was and is a bad idea and its almost like having 10 guys out there. A better receiver would have went and got that ball thrown by Edwards early. Just because players have been here doesn’t mean they deserve to start. Even Reed, some say, was a big part of the INT for TD on Saturday so I don’t know. Not to make excuses for Edwards, as he is quickly becoming or is the leagues worst preseason starting QB, but if there is a better player out there, or if the offense is geared for a player Owens’ size, then you should replace him with a player of similar size, like Johnson. Better weapons have to be out there

The Bills CAN win any game

by killascript on Aug 31, 2009 8:50 AM EDT reply actions  

I watched the game after the fact on NFL Network, and I didn’t think it was nearly as bad as what I was hearing, particularly Edwards. I think the pick-6 was on Reed.

90% of the offense’s issues I think comes down to the OL. Right now they can’t run block or pass block.

I did find it amusing to read Edwards say that the Steelers were taking away Lee Evans. 1. I thought teams played ‘vanilla’ in the pre-season? 2. We’ve heard this before, and the team has to work to find a way to get him the ball. Andre Johnson doesn’t get a lot of help and he gets over 100 catches each year.

by Pistol on Aug 31, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Andre Johnson is a totally different specimen compared to Lee. Evans is a speedster and deep threat whereas Johnson is a monster.

Delightfully Ignoring The Truth since 1995.

by NeverendingOptimism on Aug 31, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

And Johnson has had significant help. Kevin Walter has had 125 catches and 12 TDs over the past two seasons, and Owen Daniels has had 133 catches and 5 TDs over those two seasons.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Aug 31, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

4 catches/game is a lot of help?

by Pistol on Aug 31, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

8 catches a game

nearly four from each is a lot of help…

The Bills CAN win any game

by killascript on Aug 31, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lee has never been a guy who can break out of double coverage

Nor has he shown an ability to make the catch in traffic or draped with DBs, Johnson is a completely different type of animal.

(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T

-textsfromlastnight.com

by WABillsfan on Aug 31, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lee also hasn’t shown any YAC ability except when catching a deep ball in stride….

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Playing time in preseason does not equal playing time in the real season

Particularly if you are not already an “entrenched” starter, seeing a lot of playing time in the preseason games does not necessarily mean that you are in good standing with the team (especially this late in the preseason). The Bills starting receivers are already known to be TO, Evans and Reed. TO’s “injury” has given the Bills not only a chance to keep other teams from seeing what the Bills’ offense with TO in it looks like, but it has also given the coaching staff a chance to see how some other receivers look when mixed in with the starting offense. Roscoe has not looked particularly good although I would still argue that the coaching staff doesn’t design plays that take advantage of Parrish’s skill set. They need to hit Parrish in the flats where he has room to pull his moves and turn a short gain into a long gain. Pitch outs to the side clearly don’t work, neither does tight coverage down the sideline due to his size.

Guys like Ko Simpson who saw a lot of 1st team action on Saturday but don’t usually, should be worried. I think Jenkins has also received undue positive attention from the press. Jenkins has made some really critical errors in addition to the several nice catches he has made. The extended action he has seen may very well be a reflection of the team trying to see if those mistakes were flukes or not.

The Players a team is comfortable with really don’t need to play much in the preseason.

by Polish Lover on Aug 31, 2009 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

makes sense

but still, I do believe it has let to bad reads and play from the first offense

The Bills CAN win any game

by killascript on Aug 31, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Win now vs Rebuilding?

I guess, to me, it all comes down to what the coaches see this season as.

If we are trying to “win now”, do you bench experienced yet limited Walker for inexperienced yet shows potential player in Bell? You def don’t change offensive co-ordinators 2 weeks before the season (in my opinion) if you plan on winning this season. To me, making these changes screams “rebuilding year”, but maybe it does mean they are trying to “win now” and won’t put up with mediocrity, even if it means changes? I’m so confused!

The thing I know for sure is that I am still fully behind Trent Edwards as a decent QB in this league. Cause if he can’t cut it, I really don’t want to think of going through the maturation process of another QB at this point.

by StroudFanClub on Aug 31, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions  

“The thing I know for sure is that I am still fully behind Trent Edwards as a decent QB in this league. Cause if he can’t cut it, I really don’t want to think of going through the maturation process of another QB at this point..”

Unfortunatley, we may have too.

by Michael_Necci on Aug 31, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is Jauron’s last chance. He, at least, is definitely in win now mode.

I want to see movies of my dreams. - Built to Spill

by jj24 on Aug 31, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who’s to say that keeping Walker in the lineup gives us the best chance to win now? If he can’t handle the job, how would he be helping?

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not all QBs need the Maturation process most Bills fans are accustomed to (or more accurately are STILL waiting to see develop). Look at some recent examples: Roethlisberger (yeah, thanks Jacksonville), Ryan, and Flacco.

Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.

by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 31, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

But Roethlisberger, Flacco and Ryan are the exception.

Go check out how long it took for Bradshaw, Fouts, Moon, Aikman, Montana, Young, Favre, Brees, E. Manning, etc. to be great.

And you still have plenty of QB’s put into starting roles immediately and fail: Carr, Harrington, Smith, Young, and Leinart have either failed or are still struggling after being the starter as a rookie.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was trying to be optimistic in the face of fear.

Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.

by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 31, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why not go the younger route?

I’m really in favor of cutting players like: Denney, and Kelsay, and giving more playing time to Ellis, Maybin, and Bryan. Kelsay and Denney are garbage, there not nice players IMO. Ellis and Bryan have played really well this preseason, why not start one of those 3 opposite of Schobel?

Shawn Nelson should be the starting TE.. the only way you develop in this league is thru reps. Start the young guns!

by Michael_Necci on Aug 31, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Shawn Nelson is a liability in the running game. He will see significant playing time. Don’t worry.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

completely agree

The old way just isn’t working. I hate to cut veteran leadership (especially because we barely have any to begin with), but keeping people whose ceiling is reached like Denney and Kelsay for another year and letting go of a potential gem like Ellis and Bryan does not make sense.

I would say the same thing with TE, but this would be the first year starting for Schouman— this may be too quick of a judgement to say that Nelson should start, but in a position like DE where we’ve seen the best and worst of those two, let’s give someone else a shot!

by nateinrochester on Aug 31, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jim Kelly for OC

Schonert should have been canned at the end of last year. Let Kelley take over, He"s at every game anyway.If anyone can show TE how to run a no huddle Jimbo can. At the very least hire him as a consultant.

by jimkutica on Aug 31, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions  

this is a moot point

Kelly would have started coaching a long time ago….and he clearly isn’t going to

The Bills CAN win any game

by killascript on Aug 31, 2009 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

If it were my decision...

… this is what I’d do:

1.) Johnson is the 3rd WR. Reed isn’t going to develop into more than what he is. Johnson is next year’s SE if Owens leaves, and he needs the reps. I think it won’t take longer than 2-3 games for Edwards to develop the confidence in Johnson that he has in Reed.

2.) Nelson is the #2 TE. Let Fine do the blocking in 2 TE sets. Nelson plays on passing downs. Nelson isn’t any worse than the other TE’s blocking based on the Steelers game. The kid needs reps. He’s also the answer to beating the 3-4 defense. The more Edwards gets comfortable with him now, the better.

3.) I keep Denney and Kelsay as injury insurance, but based on the strong play of Ellis and Maybin, they rotate as the starting LDE. Why not? We currently get no production from Kelsay and Denney as rushers. And it’s not as if they are stopping strong side runs like Aaron Smith. But I do keep both Kelsay and Denney in case this backfires/injury. If my hand is forced in other places on the roster (ST needs) I cut Denney.

4.) Walker didn’t look terrible enough to me to warrant a switch to Bell. I’d stand-by on this one.

5.) Whitner plays a Polamalu/Sanders type role. I put him everywhere. If Byrd’s ready, Whitner plays SS on passing downs. On other downs, Scott plays the traditional SS.

6.) There’s no way I even consider a switch for Fitzpatrick at this point. Anyone thinking about ditching Edwards at this point needs to evaluate their overall football sense. It’s the pre-season.

The offense that the Bills have practiced the entire off-season is missing a huge piece (TO). Edwards is not a blue chip passer at this point (a la Peyton Manning, Brady) and can’t make up for the loss of an Owens-like talent by himself. Look what happened to Eli Manning after Burress shot himself. Not exactly the same passer.

At most, I go sign O’Connell or Feeley in place of Hamden. The earliest I think about making a QB change is the bye week.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 9:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Yessir. Agreed pretty much on all counts.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Aug 31, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I did get to watch the game yesterday on the NFL network. Butler looked like the second coming of Jon Runyan to me. I take back any idea I had that moved Butler to RG. I’m sold on him as the RT.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I strongly agree on point #4…. STRONGLY.

by Michael_Necci on Aug 31, 2009 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

5.) Whitner plays a Polamalu/Sanders type role. I put him everywhere. If Byrd’s ready, Whitner plays SS on passing downs. On other downs, Scott plays the traditional SS.

Haven’t we already done that with Whitner? He’s played all over the field, and there still have been no plays out of him.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

How many average defensive fronts get carried by their secondary?

I’m not down on Whitner, or any DB on this team, because they do not benefit from a pass rush of any sort. If Whitner played on a team with a pass rush, playing in the role described above, no one would be questioning his play.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I strongly agree with all your points…especially your last sentence of point #6: “It’s the pre-season”. Under normal circumstances, fans shouldn’t set all worked up with what they see before the games that count. Of course, these are not normal circumstances. We have a completely overhauled offensive line and we are seeing the same problems that troubled the team last year continue to plague the team during this pre-season. Being smart football fans, we easily connect the dots and see a pretty ugly picture of the future. But it still is only the pre-season so I can’t be overly worried about what I see on the field.

What worries me is the issue with Walker. I agree that he didn’t look really terrible, but if they yank him from the starting LT spot, then it means that the Bills coaches misjudged the capabilities of a guy they know pretty well. If so, then what other misjudgments have they made? Can Levitre handle the starting guard responsibilities as a rookie? Is Hangartner stout enough against the NT’s he’ll face? Can Butler handle a position he hasn’t played at since college. To me, if you start making big personnel adjustments based upon weaknesses (instead of Bell winning the job based upon his performance), then you have to seriously question the judgment of the coaches…which opens up criticism across the board.

"They're Killin' Me Whitey. They're Killin' Me" -- Lou Saban

by NJBill on Aug 31, 2009 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with everything except cutting the Hamster

He has experience in this O, if we get Feeley or O’Connell we are back to square one training our 3rd QB. Hamdan can get the job done in short stretches, but I wouldn’t rely on him for the long haul, much like Feeley proved in Miami several years ago, there is a reason he went back to Philly as the backup….

(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T

-textsfromlastnight.com

by WABillsfan on Aug 31, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

After having a say or so to settle down after the Pittsburgh debacle, I would have to say that I agree on most fronts as well. I’m still confused what to do with Whitner. I honestly think the only thing keeping him in the starting role is his high draft position. As a Buckeye fan, I watched him quite a bit in college. Honestly I didn’t think he was all that but he was definitely a better as a SS due to his hard hitting style. He never did make a lot of big plays in college either, so I think playing him in space (FS) is a mistake. Scott is showing to be just as good as Whitner at SS, Byrd isn’t ready yet at FS, so who knows? I think we stand pat at the QB position just because I don’t think there is a better solution out there right now that can learn the system quick enough. Love the idea of Johnson in the slot. We make these subtle changes you suggested, hang on for the ride & see what happens. Worst case scenario is we go 7-9 or worse and the majority get there wish and we start over again. I’d love nothing more than for DJ & Trent to prove everyone wrong and turn this thing around.

by billskk69 on Aug 31, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I completely agree on points 1,2,3,4,6.

5… Not sure about Donte being more effective when moved around a lot. Sadly, we really don’t have a choice unless Byrd steps up in the first three games. And I like the way Scott plays.

Delightfully Ignoring The Truth since 1995.

by NeverendingOptimism on Aug 31, 2009 10:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed again

Except instead of O’Connell why not take a shot at Josh Johnson from TB?

by Zorak84 on Aug 31, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Feeley can start. O’Connell could start. Johnson can’t start at this point. Johnson is a purely developmental QB. I’m not sold on keeping athletic college QB’s that need time to develop into passers.

Unless his name is Tim Tebow. : )

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

As our 3rd QB, don’t you want the biggest upside? Why could O’Connell start? NE didn’t keep him despite having no quality backup.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Bills should pick him up just to pick his brain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Someone had to say it. LOL!

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

O’Connell played in a pro style offense at San Diego State and much further advanced than Johnson. NE thought enough of him to pick him high and then place him as the 2nd string QB, initially. O’Connell had a terrible pre-season. That’s not normally a killer, but the Pats have Andrw Walter, who is a much better fit as a #2 QB than O’Connell. The decision came down to O’Connell versus Brian Hoyer. Hoyer is a Brady/Cassell type QB (intelligent, good decision maker, etc). The Pats chose Hoyer. That doesn’t mean O’Connell can’t play.

Johnson is a project with some upside. He’s still learning NFL style offenses. He may develop into an average starter. He’s still learning footwork, reading more than half the field, etc. O’Connell can already do all of that.

If a team is going to spend time and energy developing a college athlete into a QB, he’s got to have a lot more talent than Johnson, IMO.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think O’Connell was cut because NE saw little upside. As MRW said he was cut despite having no real backup. Josh Johnson has huge upside IMO and already has one year of development.

by Zorak84 on Aug 31, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree. Andrew Walter, though new to the Patriot system, is a better fit as the #2 QB. He’s got experience starting. It came down to O’Connell versus Hoyer. Hoyer is a Patriot-type QB. O’Connell has upside, but the Pats liked Hoyer better.

Johnson has more upside, agreed. But let’s say Edwards gets hurt. Fitzpartick starts. Who do you want as the back-up: O’Connell, or a guy who’s great ability but still probably can’t read his progressions?

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Edwards gets seriously hurt the season is over anyways so why not let JJ be the backup?

by Zorak84 on Aug 31, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because he’s not ready to play.

Basics of NFL quarterbacking: footwork dropping back, reading the entire defense, and throwing the ball accurately.

Johnson’s got arm talent. He may have mastered the footwork part.

Taking his college offense and limited NFL experience into consideration, I doubt he can read more than half the field during plays designed to give him easy reads.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

If there are going to be changes, do them now

First, cheers to Brian for laying out the issues so clearly for us. My own thought is that the worse thing the team can do is to go into the regular season as is, lose four or five games badly, and then start making changes. If there are problems that the coaching staff is seeing, they should act on them now and give everyone time to adjust to them before all hopes of having a good season are gone. There are times to be conservative and times not to be. Given the situation the team is in, this is a year not to hold back.

Tim Graham’s report strongly suggests that Schonert does not have that much confidence in his o-line coach. That’s understandable, given that Sean Kugler has almost no credentials to hold the job he has. I for one would definitely start Bell right away (as Tim Graham and others have pointed out, Bell is already a better LT than Walker), but I would also put Walker back at RT (he is too good a RT not to use him) and slide Butler over to RG (Butler will do well wherever you put him, and having two rookie Guards is not a great proposition).

Beyond that I would cut Schouman, who can’t block or catch passes very well, and alternate Steve Johnson and Reed in the slot to see who does better. Parrish should simply not see the field on offense.

One final thought. Everyone keeps clammering for the return of T.O., but consider what that means. The Bills are absolutely dependent on having both Owens and Evans healthy at all times during the season. If one goes out, the other gets shut down. It all suggests what a terrible mistake it was not to sign Nate Washington during the offseason. He has apparently had a great training camp with Tennessee (although he is out at the moment with a minor injury). He’s young, faster than either T.O. or Lee, and has dramatically improved in terms of his earlier problems with dropping passes. He is also a great punt returner, which would have allowed us to unload Roscoe. And he would have been relatively inexpensive. Think what a better position the Bills would be in now had they made that move.

by Macktruck on Aug 31, 2009 10:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Nate Washington would be our savior?!?! He’s a better choice than TO was? Whaaaaa? He signed a 6 year $27M deal, so it’s not like he’s that cheap. He’s never returned a punt in the NFL, so I’m not sure where you’re getting that from….

And in case you haven’t noticed, he’s injured too, and likely to miss regular season games!

If you’re talking about signing him in addition to TO, then ok, it makes a little more sense. Although it was highly unlikely the team would have brought in 2 FA WR’s….

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m saying we should have signed him in addition to T.O. Sorry I didn’t make that clear. And my point is to swap him for Roscoe on the roster. Maybe I’m crazy but I’m sure he did a lot of punt returning for the Steelers. Didn’t he break a big one in the Superbowl? He’s getting $4.5 million a year in comparison to Roscoe’s $3 million. He’s 6’ 1" and a very experienced veteran WR by this point and super-fast and still quite young. That seems like a bargain to me. Just watch what he does this year for the Titans.

by Macktruck on Aug 31, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not saying Washington wouldn’t help our O, but there was now way this team would have brought in a second WR, in addition to TO.

Washington has not returned an NFL punt. Steve Breaston had a big return for AZ in the Super Bowl. That was the only big return of the game.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you average Washington’s like Roscoe’s, Roscoe is only making 2M a year (3+1.5+1.5).

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still think Washington would be a bargain.

by Macktruck on Aug 31, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Changes

Steve Johnson should be the #3 receiver NOW. I am sick and tired of seeing Parrish being used as a possession receiver on 3-5 yard routes. His 170 lb frame is hardly effective for this. And Johnson creates match up problems that the smaller Reed does not.

Bottom line is this: our offense will remain in neutral until our line is able to run block. Edwards issues aside for a moment…until we can run, his life as a QB will continue to be miserable.

The Dick Jauron version of the K-Gun...the Squirt Gun.

by ChipShot on Aug 31, 2009 10:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Bottom line

is that after 4 pre-season games, the OL is the least of the concerns. I just do not understand Turk Schonert. The impression I get from Schonert is that he just pounds square pegs into round holes. And refuses to stop. The whole “Trent never throws downfield” argument is blow out of proportion but he DOES need to take chances down the field to keep the defense OFF-BALANCED. There is no rythym to this offense, the timing with the WR’s looks sluggish. Bottom line is Trent never throws the ball into tight windows. I think the COMBO of SCHONERT/EDWARDS is terrible, and Schonert is slowly ruining any chance Edwards has of becoming the Franchise QB in Buffalo…..ARG!!!!! BUt I keep telling myself it’s just Pre-Season!

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Aug 31, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’d be nice if they had some plays that were designed to get some 1 on 1 matchups downfield. I’ve seen most other teams run a quick fly pattern with the WR on the outside and the QB just has to take a 1 or 2 step drop and throw a touch pass 20 yards downfield. Why we’ve never tried that with Evans is beyond me. I don’t know why every throw that goes downfield has to be something over the middle, as it seems to be.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

From Michael Lombardi in today's NFP edition

In the National Football Post</a

Turk Schonert is the offensive coordinator of the Bills, a team that has some very good skills players but can’t find the end zone if it had a map. They have an offensive line that’s young, and most importantly, they have a quarterback who is still unproven. The pressure is on Schonert, but it’s also on Trent Edwards because the Bills based their whole offseason on Edwards being the answer. Again, most personnel mistakes in the NFL occur when teams wrongly evaluate their own tal

ent.

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Aug 31, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think

ultimately as you have stated Brian, what changes will the Bills coaching staff make? Today the KC Chiefs fired OC Chan Gailey. That’s a New England descendant, Scott Pioli, GM of the Chiefs, along with Todd Haley making a bold move with 13 days till the regular season opener. I’m not saying you HAVE to fire Schonert or bench Edwards, but as Lombardi says:

MOST PERSONNEL MISTAKES INT HE NFL OCCUR WHEN TEAMS WRONGLY EVALUATE THEIR OWN TALENT

I think going after another QB, whether it’s Thigpen, AJ Feeley, Tarvaris Jackson, McCown, etc, bringing in somebody else is something that the Front Office should seriously, seriously consider

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Aug 31, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Statement on Chiefs website

The Kansas City Chiefs announced on Monday that Chan Gailey has been relieved of his duties as offensive coordinator. Gailey’s status with the club will be addressed by head coach Todd Haley following the conclusion of today’s practice. Gailey originally joined the Chiefs in 2008. He came to Kansas City after a six-year stint as head coach at Georgia Tech (2002-07).

Gailey is still on the staff, but i guess in a new position. Imagine the dries if OBD were to do this. “Chaos in Buffalo! Who is in charge of the offense!” etc.

"When Manchester United are at their best I am close to orgasm!" Gianluca Vialli
"I wouldn't ever set out to hurt anyone deliberately unless it was, you know, important - like a league game or something." Dick Butkus

by gregeng on Aug 31, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

The difference between the Chiefs and Bills, though...

is that Haley can call his own plays. Jauron couldn’t do that if Turk was relieved of his duties. Nobody else on the staff is more capable or even remotely qualified to call the plays.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

but i was commenting more on how it has been done in Kansas, we would have to make a clean cut with Turk and have a replacement lined up instantly. And i still think it would be a bad move for us at this point

"When Manchester United are at their best I am close to orgasm!" Gianluca Vialli
"I wouldn't ever set out to hurt anyone deliberately unless it was, you know, important - like a league game or something." Dick Butkus

by gregeng on Aug 31, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d rather have no one in charge of it then Schonert in charge….

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hell call up Mike Martz over at the NFL studios and offer him the gig

Whats the worse that will happen?

Oh yeah, Trent lying busted on the turf and us putting up more donuts on the scoreboard, but hey, thats no different than anything else recently!

(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T

-textsfromlastnight.com

by WABillsfan on Aug 31, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great offensive mind. Devisive coach. Pass.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Come on...

Imagine how fun it would be to see Martz and T.O. calmly discussing things on the sidelines :-)

"When troops flee, are insubordinate, collapse, or are routed in battle, it is the fault of the general." – Sun Tzu. Yes Jauron, I am talking to you.

by Joe P. on Aug 31, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

TO would probably be happy with it since Martz is so pass wacky, can you imagine the number of balls

that he would have chucked his way?

(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T

-textsfromlastnight.com

by WABillsfan on Aug 31, 2009 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the main problem with the Bills right now is they don’t have an identity. And since they don’t have an identity they can’t bring in the correct coaches, the correct personnel to make things work. Sure we have some good players but when you put everything togethor the Bills just don’t make it work.
I think the Bills made a mistake in forcing Edwards to make decisions on the fly because clearly the coaches don’t even know what they want to do.
I am not suprised at all that internally things are falling apart because they clearly made some mistakes in building the team.
A quick example is the progression that has been made with Jason Cambell with the Redskins – Jim Zorn is a QB coach, and I have seen Cambell really progress from prior seasons. What have the Bills done to help Edwards succed? Or any of their players for that instance?
Until the Bills decide what they want to do they aren’t going to succed – you can’t put Roscoe Parrish on the field and only throw it short when he is surrounded by players…

by Ghetts on Aug 31, 2009 11:34 AM EDT reply actions  

agreed

you must have a plan to succeed, and constantly make changes to adapt to the situation and never be afraid to admit when you’re wrong, correct the error and move on. TEAM, TEAM, TEAM. The Bills have tied their wagon to Edwards, feeling that T.O., a reshuffled OL and a no-huddle offense will make it all better. but you can’t cover up Edwards and his tenative nature, and inability to make significant plays in the passing game thus far this pre-season. God be with us when we go into New England

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Aug 31, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you want to talk about the Bills’ identity, for better or worse, it is personified – top to bottom – by Dick Jauron. Even Special Teams, despite April’s best efforts, seem Jauronified.

by Zumone on Aug 31, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ding! We have a winner!
I think the main problem with the Bills right now is they don’t have an identity. And since they don’t have an identity they can’t bring in the correct coaches, the correct personnel to make things work. Sure we have some good players but when you put everything togethor the Bills just don’t make it work.

The Bills have the best scouting staff in the NFL. How we aren’t good is beyond me. And really, this is why.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

A quick example is the progression that has been made with Jason Cambell with the Redskins – Jim Zorn is a QB coach, and I have seen Cambell really progress from prior seasons.

You’re going to use a QB the Redskins tried to replace as an example of what to do?

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Only on how they actually helped him progress. They realized their QB had some faults so they did things to try and improve, wether it be get a new QB or work with what they got. I don’t think they staff has helped Edwards, they have given him more responsibilities, but after the fall of last season, if you don’t make Edwards better, giving him more to do only leaves the offense that much more lacking.

by Ghetts on Aug 31, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Bills haven’t had an identity since Jauron/Levy came on board. There has been too much trying to fit square pegs in round holes instead of taking one approach and running with it.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 31, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Team will Be different on Sept 14

ok looking back to last year the team was really bad in the preseason last year 0-4 or did you forget and then they started the regualr seaon 5-0. That is a big differnce not saying that the bills will do that same this year. Also Brain didn’t Trent do bad last year in the preseason i belive he did having 3 int’s and 1 td lst preseason. So I say just wait until Sept 14 the team will be different.

GO BUFFALO

by kooldude on Aug 31, 2009 11:50 AM EDT reply actions  

they need to look really close at players being released this week.we really need help on d line to get some pressure on qb.looked liked the same team last year cant get off the field on 3rd downs.they looked good but still no pass rush.we can only hope TO is what Edwards needs to break out of funk hes in.only really good drive he had was first game till pic.

keith_b

by Billzfan on Aug 31, 2009 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

There is not going to be a DE upgrade on the waiver wire. It’s why we drafted Maybin.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Any decent pass rusher has already been scooped up or they are on long term contracts now

Burgess was the last shot we had at getting such a player and we whiffed on it. Agreed MRW, what we have is what we got

(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T

-textsfromlastnight.com

by WABillsfan on Aug 31, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bills need Mike Shannan

I think the Bills offense needs someone that understands offense. Hire Mike Shannan as a special consultant. He does not make good decisions as a coach, look at his record after Elway but he understands how to build an offense and how to get a offensive line ready to play.

by Denverbills on Aug 31, 2009 12:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I feel like Glen Beck!
I think the Bills offense needs someone that understands offense. Hire Mike Shannan as a special consultant. He does not make good decisions as a coach, look at his record after Elway but he understands how to build an offense and how to get a offensive line ready to play.

We’re putting the pieces together!

Though Shanahan as coach with Brandon as the COO is the way I’d go. Brandon seems to be accurate with his assessment of the team’s personnel, and it’s been showing the past couple drafts and off-seasons.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I feel like Glen Beck!

Oh, God!! That’s the worst thing that can happen to a person. Is there anything we can do to help?

I want to see movies of my dreams. - Built to Spill

by jj24 on Aug 31, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seriously, I take his every word as truth. ; )

Though he does bring up some good points.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you edit your own post?

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can't.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks. Just going to be more careful then.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

3 rookies starting on line?

If the Bills start Demetrius Bell, that would basically mean 3 rookies starting on the offensive line. They should move Butler back to guard. The long and short of it is that this team has not improved themselves much, except for addition of T.O., and will probably finish around 6-10……..Let’s hope they can bring back a Bill Polian-type G.M.

by BuffaloWhiner on Aug 31, 2009 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Bill Polian was promoted from within...

just remember that nugget.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I asked Mike Lombardi at NFP, who wrote the blurb on Schonert, about who would replace Schonert if he was relieved of his duties. His response:

that is a huge problem

Ouch

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 31, 2009 1:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Great coaches aren’t just great in their own right. They consistently develop younger coaches to take their place.

Belichick runs through coordinators every year or two, but develops new replacements as he goes. It’s interesting that Pepper Johnson is coaching the Patriot defensive line, though he played as a linebacker. Sounds like the future DC once Pees gets his shot at the big time.

The only guy on the staff who anyone could even think about replacing Schonert is AVP.

Also, the more I read comments by the players the past two years, the more I get the distinct feeling that the players feel the issues are with the offensive coaches.

“There is area for concern,” he (Edwards) said. “There is plenty of things we need to fix pretty quickly. But I feel like we have a good group of guys who want to go in the right direction who want to be coached, and that’s the bottom line.”

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Coordinators/Coaches

How about Jon Gruden as a new offensive coordinator, and Mike Shanahan as a new head coach if all doesn’t go well this season?

Shanahan helped make Denver have a potent offense. He could help the bills.

Brian Billick or even Steve Mariucci would be improvements in the positions of head coach/ offensive coordinator.

Plus there is usually one or two young coordinators that are making or made a name for themselves in the season who can land a big coaching job after the season is over… we’ll have to see who that person is after this year.

Two offseasons ago there was Rex Ryan and John Harbaugh. This last one there was Todd Haley. And others during those years, maybe?

There’s always someone.

So maybe Ralph should considering opening up his pocketbook a bit more and spending a bit for a better head coach. He has been known to make some Free Agent moves (See: Terrell Owens, Drew Bledsoe). Why not make a big coaching splash?

Opinions?

by JMP on Aug 31, 2009 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Buffalo is tailor-made for a great coach to win. We don’t have a GM, but have an up-and-comer in Russ Brandon, and a great scouting staff. A coach who likes more than normal HC-responsibilities would do well here. In order from those I like most to least:

Shanahan- Best choice. Belichick-like organizer and brilliant offensive mind. He knows how to beat New England. Needs a great front office… not a great personnel decision maker. I think Shanahan and Brandon would be great.

Cowher- Next best. Great motivator and would bring a Buffalo-tough identity to the team. Would do well with Brandon. Not a fan of the 3-4 though.

Gruden- iffy. Devisive as a coach. Inherited a great defense. Offense was never really special, though with the Bills front office, he could get some really good building blocks. How he would work with Brandon would be a question. But he likes Tebow- a plus in my book. ; )

Mariucci- Maybe. Also inherited a good SF team, but couldn’t do much with Detriot.

Billick- smart but hasn’t been able to develop offense as a HC.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 31, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh yea i forgot about Cowher. Not sure if he’s actually retired from coaching or taking a few years off or waiting for “The Perfect Offer”.

by JMP on Aug 31, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gruden AND Shanahan!?!?

Neither will happen let alone both. The only shot of this even remotely happening is with new ownership.

You are blinding beacon of light from heaven.

by Scrumtrulescent on Aug 31, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or basically with death… not to sound morbid, but Ralph is 90.

by JMP on Aug 31, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

"new ownership"

was my sensitive way of saying exactly that.

You are blinding beacon of light from heaven.

by Scrumtrulescent on Aug 31, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Love this post Brian!

I think Bell should start over Walker. Judging by how fast he has developed to this point, give him meaningful reps in games and he should be better than Walker in no time. He certainly is not much of a downgrade so why not?

Get rid of Schonert – Wow love the idea but not the timing. Unless you bring in an experienced guy to take over, I would prefer living with the less than stellar play-calling. I’d prefer to see them huddle up more, because the game evidently has not slowed down for Trent yet and accelerating the pace is not helping.

your paragraph

Giving away playing time.
EXCELLLENT!!!!!!!!!!
You know my thoughts on this subject, I’ve been screaming for Scuba-Steve since last pre-season, he’s a playmaker and should be on the field. He is much better than Reed or Parrish. Nelson is another guy that is really impressing me, he has the balls skills and speed to get open and from what I’ve saw in pre-season, he also can block pretty good – he needs to get some serious playing time. Byrd over whitner, 100% – no doubts in my mind. Whitner is by no means a ball hawk, and we need some serious balls skills at FS. Not sure that I agree with starting Maybin full time just yet but I definitely agree with getting him on the field as much as possible but I’d love to see him & Schobel, I seriously think that Kelsay needs to go. Denney can do the job and the message that it would send would be clear – make plays or ship out!

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Aug 31, 2009 6:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Demote Reed

I agree with previous posters who question the assumption that Reed deserves the #3 WR spot. Johnson — or even Parrish, if given significant playing time — could give the Bills a spark. Reed is nothing special.

by Flutie Flakes on Sep 1, 2009 1:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Reed is an excellent possession receiver. Don’t take that away from him. He has performed admirably over the past two years in a role not designed for his talents.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 1, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

We are a much better team with Evans/Owens/Johnson – Clearly without a doubt.

The INT in the Steelers game was clearly because Reed slowed down to avoid the hit. Possession receivers don’t do that.

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Sep 1, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

The INT in the Steelers game was clearly because Reed slowed down to avoid the hit. Possession receivers don’t do that.

And neither does Josh Reed in the regular season. Should he have put himself out there and taken a huge hit in the preseason?

We are a much better team with Evans/Owens/Johnson – Clearly without a doubt.

Johnson has, what, ten catches in his career but he is better than Reed “without a doubt”? I am as optimistic as anyone but there is plenty of doubt about Johnson.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 1, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I will repeat what i have been saying since last pre-season, Steve Johnson has made the best of every chance he’s gotten. He makes the difficult catches, he gets open, he is a big target at 6’2" and he blocks extremely well – look at the film.

Last year when Reed was out our brain trust in all their wisdom gave the start to Roscoe Parrish and he did nothing with his opportunity. Why they didn’t give Steve a chance I’ll never know. But this coaching staff protects their vets and their mediocrity – guys like Kelsay, Whitner, Parrish, Reed, Royal and our two bozo centers from last year. The reality is none of these guys would be starters on other teams.

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Sep 1, 2009 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

First, Royal is starting on Cleveland.

Second, they cut Royal and the two bozos you speak of so they couldn’t be protecting them much.

Whitner would be a starter on another team.

Reed and Parrish don’t start on our team… They recognized the same thing you did and upgraded. Give them credit for that.

You can say what you want about Steve Johnson. I think he could be great. There is no way you can say “Without a doubt” about him since he has ten catches in his career. Give me a larger sample size before we crown him.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 2, 2009 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Matt, after the 2007 season we clearly needed help at Center but yet this coaching staff did nothing in FA or the draft to remedy the situation, instead choosing to give the veterans the benefit of the doubt and more time to prove themselves. Well we saw how that worked out. We wasted the 2008 season proving that they were garbage but everyone knew they were at the end of 2007…

Royal is not the starter yet in cleveland, their depth chart is not yet published – I checked before writing this.

Reed and Parrish should be WR4-5 not 2-3. When our WR2 goes down and Reed or Parrish gets the call, the coaching staff is wrong, why? Because we gave both of those guys every chance in the world to prove their value and they failed big time. Reed is an OK SB but others could be better and definitely have shown enough to deserve the opportunity to get a start over Reed & Parrish. Again, the coaching staff protects their veterans too much.

Steve has done nothing to prove me otherwise whereas Parrish & Reed both have gotten numerous chances to take hold of the WR2 position and have failed miserably. Steve Johnson deserves the chance to try and prove himself. IMO he we prevail “without a doubt” in my mind. You might have a doubt but I don’t. Last year Hardy got some opportunities and did nothing with them whereas Steve Johnson made the best of the little opportunities he got. Let’s forget the 7th rounder stigma and give the kid the chance that he has earned.

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Sep 2, 2009 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reed and Parrish should be WR4-5 not 2-3.

They’re not 2-3, they’re 3-4.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Sep 4, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Clearly without a doubt.

How is that without a doubt?

What has Stevie proven? He looks to have a nice future, but right now, I think Reed’s blocking and ability to move the chains is ahead of Stevie’s, at least until proven otherwise.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Sep 1, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

And the best way to make sure he doesn’t surpass Reed is to not give him the chance. Way to go DJ!

Your ability to control the LOS is directly linked to your ability to win football games!
FEED the BEAST!

by keysh67 on Sep 1, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Finesse Offensive Tackles

Recent FanPosts

Small
Bills needs
Small
Fixing The Bills' Pass Rush Without Breaking The Bank
Small
Stanford Routt in Today....got this feeling
Buffalo_bills-1_small
Teams Can Carry Over Unused Cap Space
Small
The Mother of All Stats - Part 3
Truth1_small
What's the Diggity?
Fitzmagical_small
Jackson, Spiller and the Future of Buffalo's RB
Small
Why I'm so focused on drafting QB Brock Osweiler with #42 pick
Small
Mother of all Stats -- Part 2
Slide1_small
Bills Dream Off-Season

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Lead Editors

Img_20110806_213313_small Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Senior Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Contributing Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Site Moderators

211_talking_proud_1_small krytime

Santa_bill_small poz

Billsdinosaurrider_small WABillsfan

Avatar31985_4_small silverstreak3k

3850_small JPH