Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Which Way to Roll the Coverage?

With the addition of T.O. much has been said about not only what T.O. can bring to the passing game in Buffalo, but also what effect he will have on Evans, Reed, Parrish and company.  Mainly, what will this do to Lee Evans?  Evans has been a legit #1 in Buffalo since he arrived in 2004.  With sporadic QB play, Evans leads the league in big play TD catches in the last 5 seasons.  He is the definition of a "big play guy."  He is 28 years old, entering his 6th NFL season, has a career high of 82 catches in 2006 and caught a mere 63 balls last year.  He has speed, he handles his body well, and he has strong hands.  He has never been the premier WR like Andre Johnson, whom despite many losing seasons has been able to put up Pro-Bowl numbers.  However, Evans possesses good route-running, ability to separate off the line of scrimmage, and ability to always have DB's thinking in the back of their heads "this guy can beat me deep all day."  

Michael Lombardi wrote in his column for the National Football Post yesterday about how Amani Toomer and T.O. struggled to separate from DB's last season, which is the main reason these veteran WR's have diminished skills.  I have a die-hard Cowboys fan who is a great friend of mine, who said the Cowboys were forced to slide T.O. in motion a lot to try and give him a head start on separating from DB's.  Add to that that T.O. led the league in drops last year, and you really have to question about the player we are getting.  Make no doubt about it, T.O.'s skills have diminished.  However, his work ethic, influence on this team and fan base, leadership, and ability to teach James Hardy make the signing a no-brainer in my book.  The real WR on this team is Lee Evans, as he is in his prime, has developed a rapport with QB Trent Edwards for the past 2 seasons, and is coming off signing his mega 4 year deal for ~$36 million.  Lombardi had this to say in his column about T.O. last year and more importantly about how teams will play the Bills this season:

Many people feel Terrell Owens was dismissed from Dallas for his poor behavior, but just as important was his inability to consistently beat press coverage, which made him a liability at times and resulted in his termination. When teams rolled to Owens, he was not the same player, so the Cowboys had to motion to create space. Since the NFL is not the CFL, teams can only motion one player at a time. If you’re a team that has too many receivers who struggle to separate from bump, your passing game is going to struggle. In Buffalo, Owens will not face rolled coverage -- Lee Evans will. If teams don’t roll to Evans, he’ll put 100 yards on them before halftime. Trust me on that.

Why do I bring this up?  Because Lee Evans will still be facing the double coverages.  Teams will play that safety high on Lee's side to prevent the big play.  So while many people think the addition of T.O. will be like relieving a log jam in a struggling to flow stream, I believe that the addition of T.O. only helps if he can also make big plays on the other side OR open it up for the skill players Lynch, Jackson, Parrish, Reed, etc to make plays in the underneath game.  And I will be the first to say I really doubt whether T.O. can be a legit #2 across from Evans in the ultra-competitive AFC, in which Owens has NEVER played a full season in.  

If T.O. cannot effectively get off the line and win 1-on-1 battles especially on 3rd down, then this offense will not be much more effective than last season.  And if Trent and Turk FORCE the ball to T.O. that will end up in an even worse situation.  While revamping the OL was something that had to be done, if they can be effective in the run game, and handle these 3-4 fronts, the Bills offense I don't see how it will be any better than last year.  Point blank, this team HAS to up its scoring average from 21 per game of last season, to 23-24 this season, unless the defense becomes Top 10 which I don't see possible with Kelsay still on this roster.

The no-huddle, the addition of Rhodes and Shawn Nelson, the hopeful improvement of Steve Johnson, Derek Schouman, Derek Fine, and most importantly Trent Edwards is what fans, media and observers are looking at as reasons this offense can improve BESIDES the most obvious and T.O.  

Prediction:  If this team wants to go to the playoffs, there is no doubt who should lead this team there in the WR corps and that's Lee Evans.  Maybe he will continue to get double-teamed but that will just open up the run game, and other skill players, and Trent needs to finally recognize this.  If I have to hear about 8 man coverages and how they are doubling Lee over the top, I'm going to puke.  Make an ADJUSTMENT, run the ball effectively, and utilize the short-underneath passing game and no-huddle to make teams get out of those coverages!    T.O. should be a role player this season, and not a focal point.  If he is a focal point, sure he'll get his stats (and he'll drop a ton of balls), but I guarantee we won't be going to the playoffs.  The Bills want to go to the playoffs for the first time in a decade, Lee Evans is the guy that should and can lead them there.  

Poll
If the Bills are to win enough games to go to the playoffs this season, who should lead the team in receptions?
T.O.
46 votes
Lee Evans
79 votes

125 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost was written by a registered user of Buffalo Rumblings. Its views do not necessarily reflect the views of Rumblings' editorial staff, but are just as valued as our own.

3 recs  |  Comment 21 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

No way that having Owens in the line up will yield the same poor results from last year.

There’s no way his skill set (if truly diminished) would be as limited as Josh Reed’s in the #2 role last year. Owens won’t be used as a decoy – nor should he. Evans has proven one thing: home-run threat. There’s no way that anyone can expect Edwards to consistently toss the ball 30 or 40 yards over the top of a DB for Evans. If Evans can become a bit like TO and work the middle of the field more, then I could see him becoming the focal point.

I think it has to be a symbiotic relationship with Evans and Owens. One won’t lead the team to the playoffs. I forsee a Moulds/Price-like season in terms of potential.

Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.

by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 6, 2009 12:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think what he's saying is Lee's numbers will be about the same...

not that the offense on the whole will be the same.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 8, 2009 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

frankly I don’t care who should lead the team in receptions. for all we know Josh Reed may lead the team. whoever gets opens the most and holds onto the ball providing YAC is what’s important. ideally I would like to see evans and owens have a proportionate amount and reed have slightly less. makes it difficult for other teams to decide who they should focus on. throw in a developing TE’s group and the bills could be onto something.
Owens can be made the scapegoat in Dallas but the fact is Romo faded badly and Witten was banged up. many more factors went into that team failing besides Owens.

by gatornation on Aug 6, 2009 12:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t vote because I thought Reed would have the most…..

I’m sure TO does struggle getting off the line – but I’m sure he’s not washed up. He’ll catch TD’s for us.

Remember we can move between the 20’s fairly well – the red zone is a problem area for us – his size along with Nelson and S. Johnson should give us really good options now.

Which way to roll coverage?

Depends on who they want to get beat by – they can stay in a shell and run 2 deep and Reed will find room in the slot or the can leave TO or Lee one on one and Trent’s going to have to take a chance.

I think that’s what Trent has to do – just give the WR a chance when he’s singled up and let him make a play – something i’m not too sure Trent has done too much of

I am so clever that sometimes I don’t understand a single word of what I am saying

by J2 on Aug 6, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Remember we can move between the 20’s fairly well – the red zone is a problem area for us – his size along with Nelson and S. Johnson should give us really good options now.

Agreed, J2. The offense for the most part did very well until the red zone. As it appears right now (very early in the season, I know), there will be a few more legit red zone options for the offense.

"I know I'm a true receiver..." Roscoe Parrish, Buffalo Bills - May 2009
"In my heart, I know I'm funny." Lt Steven Hauk, Good Morning Vietnam - 1987

by thefourwinds on Aug 6, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think of it this way.

What a problem to have!!!!!!!!

by VanScottM on Aug 6, 2009 12:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This just shows how important Trent’s decision making will be.

Teams will feel us out through out the season and look at who we favor. Turk needs to be creative with the play calling and play design and Trent needs to throw to the open receiver….easy huh?

"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone"
-Marshawn Lynch-

by billsoferie on Aug 6, 2009 1:42 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

In my opinion I don’t think Owens was brought in to really take a ton of coverage off Lee (though it will probablyhappen as a resulte). He was brought in to turn FG into TD. And I think he will do that and help improve other things as a result such as: Josh Reed gets to stick to the slot where he excels. And let’s say TO doesn’t get guys out of the box for a WR he is a pretty good blocker – as is Reed, watch for run plays to go to their side…

by Ghetts on Aug 6, 2009 2:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Lombardi answered the question
When teams rolled to Owens, he was not the same player, so the Cowboys had to motion to create space.

Having Owens on the opposite side will open up the offense. If a defense wants to effectively cover both Evans and Owens, they have to play a cover two which allows Owens’ corner to press. That leaves only the front seven to stop the run, and the TE, RB, and slot WR are all in man coverage. I’d take that all day if I were Edwards.

If the defense doesn’t play a cover two and rolls coverage to Evans, Owens’ corner can’t press all the time, and the route tree opens up for Owens.

If the defense rolls coverage to Owens, Evans will do exactly what Lombardi says.

It’s foolish for a defense to play cover two, commiting four DB’s to cover two WR. So Edwards will likely see coverage rolled to Evans…. and Owens won’t have to motion to beat the press.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 6, 2009 2:54 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

yes!

just erased my comment – as yours is precisely what i was going to say!!

the onus will be on edwards to effectively read defenses. and, opposing teams will have to work harder to disguise coverages than they have the past few years.

by LeClaireBill on Aug 6, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again, it comes back to Edwards

It’s not Owens or Evens or Lynch or even Turk. It’s completely on Trent Edwards shoulders like Brian wrote when he made him the #1 Key to 2009. Trent has to see what the D is giving him and make a decision. He’s got to be able to say “shut up Turk, you’re wrong, we’re pitching to the weak side because I hit TO twice and Reed once this drive on the strong side. And no, I will not allow a reverse to parrish! Reverses should only be used three times ALL season. God!”

It doesn’t matter to whom the Coverage rolls to; Trent the triggerman decides who to hit.

Delightfully Ignoring The Truth since 1995.

by NeverendingOptimism on Aug 6, 2009 3:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that's where I think

the mis-conception is…. the coverage does indeed DICTATE where he goes with the ball. The BIlls were futile last year at the end of the season and the typical answer we got was teams took away Lee and the Bills didn’t adjust. SImply having Owens on the other side does nothing if the guy can’t get off the line of scrimmage. I guarantee you Belichick will just body up Owens and take him away. Defenses DICTATE to the Bills where they go with the ball, not the Bills dictating the other way around. Now, maybe that will change, but for people that think simply having Owens will change coverages, I think you got the blinders on….

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Aug 6, 2009 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is where having a successful running game would greatly improve things.

"I know I'm a true receiver..." Roscoe Parrish, Buffalo Bills - May 2009
"In my heart, I know I'm funny." Lt Steven Hauk, Good Morning Vietnam - 1987

by thefourwinds on Aug 6, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Teams weren’t just taking away Evans. Edwards was torching blitzes during the first month of the season. Teams reacted by employing heavy coverage schemes and Edwards struggled. Unfortunately, the coaching staff never adjusted to that adjustment. Indeed, at one point someone (can’t recall for sure but I think it was Edwards) let it slip in an interview that the defenses the Bills saw on Sundays weren’t the defenses they had watched on film and prepared for during the week.

Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner

by Ron From NM on Aug 6, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, and now that Trent has seen those D’s he can adjust accordingly.

Delightfully Ignoring The Truth since 1995.

by NeverendingOptimism on Aug 6, 2009 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trent did say it after the Browns game.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.

by MattRichWarren on Aug 8, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but for people that think simply having Owens will change coverages, I think you got the blinders on….

I mistyped/spoke. I’m highlighting that we didn’t adjust last year at all and that this year with the inclusion of a no huddle style O, adjustments will be made. It’s just all on Trent.

Just having Owens doesn’t change things. Having Lynch, Evans, Owens, Reed, Jackson, and The Dereks with Nelson does change the passing attack (Parrish, I guess too). There are A LOT of weapons on this team. TO was a force as pretty much the only reliable WR on Dallas aside from Jason Witten. 69 catches, 15.2 yard avg. 10 TDs. If that’s what happens when he gets pressed, who cares? He will beat that press eventually and make them pay. And if they slide the safety on top? Evans. Teams WILL have to account for Owens and Evans. I think the Bills will be able to get away with a good deal of mid field passes in the early season.

You’re right… as the D adjusts, Trent, Turk and the O must as well.

Delightfully Ignoring The Truth since 1995.

by NeverendingOptimism on Aug 6, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're talking about two different things...

Will Owens dictate changes in coverages? Yes. Off course he will. Teams will either roll coverage to him, or maybe put their best corner on him and roll coverage to Evans.

Does the coverage dictate where Edwards will go with the ball? Yes. It always does.

The difference: coverage changes accounting for Owens will be mostly pre-game, prepared and practiced. Where Edwards goes with the ball take prep and practice but doesn’t actually get decided until pre-snap reads and in the first second of the play unfolding.

Teams are going to have a difficult time playing zones against Edwards. If they roll coverage to Evans, which is likely, the corner matching up against Owens is either in man or playing the deep third on that side, with a LB/SS playing underneath the CB. That puts the defense in a similar situation as playing cover two, as four players (S, CB, CB, LB/SS) are are accounting for Evans and Owens, leaving 3-to-4 defenders against the RB, TE, and slot receiver. Again, I’ll take that match-up.

If the defense goes man and rolls a safety to Evans’ side, the coverage is simpler to read and zone-blitzes are minimized.

Either way, it’s all in Edwards’ hands.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 6, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Good write up Marv

Front page material, IMO.

"I BET YOU IF WE PUT A 12 DOZEN GLAZE DONUTS AT THE OTHER END ON KICK RETURN JAIME DUKES WILL BE OUR NUM # 1 RETURNER …… HOW YOU LIKE THEM APPLES DUKE APPLE PIE PUNKEN EATER DWINKE SMASHER DING DONG FLABER" - abayarde

by Joe P. on Aug 6, 2009 10:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Great fanpost. I’ve got a bunch of thoughts, but I’m not really sure what they add up to.

The first is that I think you were smart to leave Josh Reed off the poll. Unless injuries strike, I can’t imagine him leading the team in catches. And if he does, it’s probably very bad news for Trent and his ability to throw the ball down the field. What slot receiver has ever lead his team in catches? And Wes Welker doesn’t count, when NE only puts 2 WRs on the field, Welker is one of them and he is always higher on NE’s progressions then Reed will be this year.

Rolling coverage is kind of a vague term. Every team is going to give safety help to a CB covering a player like Evans. The thought that Owens was going to leave Evans with regular single coverage was pretty crazy. Evans may have fewer LBs and nickel corners hanging around him in zone and teams might try and get away with some cover 1 where the FS will be forced to cover a lot more ground with TO around, but the coverage on Evans isn’t going to change a ton. He’s just too good of a deep threat for teams to not try and take that away from him.

Another thing to consider with coverage is whether or not teams will blitz. Evans was more succesful early in the season when teams were still testing Trent. Are teams really going to blitz Trent, or will four man rushes get pressure on a question mark of an offensive line?

While Evans dealt with a lot of coverage last year, it has to be pointed out that he didn’t deal with anything more difficult than a lot of other WRs who have still been much better statistically. With no viable 2nd receiver, Roddy White has been spectacular for a couple seasons in a row. Antonio Bryant was the only receiver on Tampa’s roster that opposing teams had to worry about and he had numbers very similiar to Evans’ 06 campaign. Calvin Johnson did it alone last year and Steve Smith has had some ridiculous seasons without help. Evans’ numbers won’t magically improve because TO is here. Considerable statistical improvement will have to come from Trent taking a big step forward.

The impact of TO isn’t that Evans becomes a bigger threat. It’s that Evans doesn’t have to become a bigger threat. Buffalo doesn’t need him to be a 1,300+ yard superstar like Smith, Johnson (A. or C.) or White. Being a 65 catch, 1,000 yard, elite deep threat is plenty good when you’ve got a 6’3, 225 pound player who hasn’t averaged fewer than 4 catches per game since his rookie season.

I voted for TO based off my belief that the coverage on Evans isn’t going to change a ton and my opinion that Evans isn’t a great WR when he can’t run straight for 15 yards to start his route and I think that the Bills are going to use TO in a lot of short, possesion type routes this year. I think you’ll see Owens doing his best Josh Reed impression a decent percentage of the time with 8-10 yard curls and outs. I think TO catches 70+ balls next year, which shouldn’t be a ton more than Evans, but a balanced attack is probably ideal anyways.

by kaisertown on Aug 7, 2009 1:18 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Evans #1, T.O. #2, and Lynch #3 - Believe It!!

I have to agree with kaisertown that Evans DOESN’T have to be a bigger threat!! Evans is who Evans is – a deep threat guy that will usually get 50-60 catches and 1200 to 1400 yards. Owens on the other hand will get more touches, 70+, and also making 1200 to 1400 yardages as well. But the real deal is LYNCH!! He needs to get more touches from the backfield where Evans and Owens disrupts the outfield. Lynch will need to become a Westbrook type of player in order for this team to really flourish and use Evans and Owens ability to the max.

I see a lot of Westbrook type of a player in lynch, that’s why I believe it’s not up to Evans or Owens, because they’ll get their numbers and yardages, but without Lynch becoming the #3 receiver on the team I don’t see the team making the playoffs. I like Reed, Hardy, Parrish, and Johnson but they’re not a Lynch – they can’t create their gaps and that’s where Lynch could turn a 3 yard catch into a 7 yard run plus some.

I do believe that the other receivers will have to play their roles. Throw in Reed on short yardages, he has great soft hands; throw in Parrish if they have a speedy nickel or quick LB’s; give them Hardy or Johnson if you’re trying to out jump them!! You’re next best solid player will not always be the wisest choice.

Overall, I think Evans will put up decent number as he always have. Owens will still get his share, and majority of it too, catches and ball thrown his way. But lastly, Lynch will have to step up his game and get 1200 from behind the line of scrimmage, and roughly 800 in the outfield. Now that will take the BILLS to the playoffs!!

by blowfishee on Aug 11, 2009 8:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Buffalo_bills-1_small
CFB's returning mind dump
Small
I would love Haslett as new HC
Small
Mike Shanahan, How the Bills can land him.
Small
Best Future Coach...
Billsjaguars_small
On Mike Shanahan and Gary Kubiak
Hamstergolfhd4_small
3 Things We Need to Know: Weeks 5-10
Dib_small
Bills fans, I'm coming for you...
Bills_small
Release of Hamdan
Picture_2_small
Two possible father/son combos
Images_small
The Remaining Games

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Editor-in-Chief

Ronswanson_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Billsjaguars_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Nfl-toronto_small kaisertown