Buffalo Rumblings: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NFL Power Rankings for Week 11

Bills Fantasy Friday: Week 2 Start 'Em/Sit 'Em

Photo

More photos » by Steven Senne - AP

Welcome back to Week 2 of Fantasy Football Friday at Buffalo Rumblings.  Week 1 saw a couple of Buffalo Bills put up nice fantasy performances against the Patriots, while a couple of others were total disappointments (cough, Lee Evans, cough). The Tampa Bay Buccaneers visit the Ralph this Sunday for a 4:05 tilt in the Bills' home opener.  Once again, we'll be taking a look at the individual fantasy players of note and offering up some generic advice.  Check out my suggestions for Bills and Buccaneers after the jump:

Star-divide

Quarterbacks
Byron Leftwich - As a real life quarterback, I think Leftwich is one of the worst starters in the league.  That doesn't mean he can't be a decent fantasy option for a desperate owner.  Against the Cowboys, Leftwich put up a solid line of 276 yards, completing 61% of his passes and adding one touchdown.  As an offense, the Bucs put up 450 yards, much to the surprise of fans everywhere.  Leftwich was a big part of that, but isn't a guy that fantasy owners should really be considering as an option.  It's unlikely he'll be consistent enough to put up totals like that on a week-to-week basis.  However, after seeing Tom Brady shred the Bills for 378 yards and a pair of touchdowns, the Bucs may be more than willing to establish the passing game this week.  I expect the Bills defense to come after Leftwich in hopes of forcing him into mistakes due to his slow release and lack of mobility.  With Antonio Bryant iffy, Leftwich could be without his best option.  It's tough to envision him putting up big numbers this week, on the road, in a hostile Ralph.  Unless you have Donovan McNabb as a starter and are in a deep league, you will have better options. Verdict: Sit 'Em

Trent Edwards - Edwards was one of the Bills who put up nice fantasy numbers in Week 1.  It was a surprising effort considering his poor pre-season play, the move to Alex Van Pelt and a very questionable offensive line.  He quieted the critics, at least for one week, but he needs to do more to prove he's worthy of being a weekly fantasy option.  Edwards and the Bills' passing game does seem to have a great matchup this week, however.  The Bucs defense allowed Tony Romo to throw for 353 yards on just 16 completions, with three 40+ yard touchdowns.  Its safe to say the Tampa D just might be susceptible to the big play.  With their best defensive back out again this week (Tanard Jackson), and young players still getting comfortable (Sabby Piscitelli, Elbert Mack), look for Alex Van Pelt to try to get the ball downfield more this week.  Again, McNabb owners should consider Edwards as a fill-in, but owners of QBs with tough matchups (Matt Schaub @Tennessee, Jay Cutler vs Pittsburgh, Phillip Rivers vs Baltimore) may also look his way.  It's a tough call, but it might be worth the risk. Verdict: Start 'Em as a fill-in

Running Backs
Cadillac Williams - I'm not going to lie, I root for Cadillac.  It's tough to root against a good guy who's overcome so many injury issues just to be playing right now.  He had an excellent performance in Week 1, shredding the Cowboys for 97 yards and a touchdown on just 13 carries.  He's looked quick and healthy, and will likely see an increase in touches in closer games.  I expect this game to be closer, and I expect the Bucs to go to the Caddy early and often.  I'm guessing he gets 15-20 touches this week, and will still be the first option for goal line carries.  He's a very good flex option and maybe even RB2 this week, even against a stouter looking Bills run D.  Unfortunately, with Paul Posluszny out, it should be easier for the Bucs' run game. Verdict: Start 'Em as a flex or RB2 in deeper leagues.

Derrick Ward - Ward also had a nice Week 1, putting together 83 total yards on 14 touches and a touchdown.  Ward and Williams will likely split the touches pretty evenly once again this week, with Cadillac likely to see more run and goal line opportunities.  In PPR leagues, Ward is the better play.  I probably wouldn't consider playing Ward outside of PPR leagues or as a flex. Verdict: Start 'Em as a flex

Earnest Graham - I like Graham and think he deserves touches in their offense. He only had one carry last week, though, so move along.

Fred Jackson - Jackson had an excellent game against the Patriots, putting together 140 total yards, 5 receptions and a touchdown.  In PPR leagues, he's gold, but he's also proving to be a more than capable option as a RB2.  The Cowboys gouged the Bucs for 4.9 yards per carry, so it's a good bet we'll see Jackson getting more carries this week.  I like the matchup and expect Jackson to have another very good all around game.  Again, in PPR leagues Jackson gets a major bump. Verdict: Start 'Em in all leagues

Wide Receivers
Antonio Bryant - Bryant missed practice on Thursday still trying to recover from his early August knee surgery.  He played last week against Dallas, but was limping by the end of the game.  Cryptic Raheem Morris says he is hurt, but not injured, whatever that means.  I don't know if we should expect Bryant to play, and if he does, he obviously won't be 100%.  I'd steer clear unless you're totally desperate. Verdict: Sit 'Em

Michael Clayton - Remember him? He of the 1,000-yard monster rookie season and zero 500-yard seasons since.  He's only scored two touchdowns since scoring seven as a rookie.  What happened to this guy? Every time I watch him, he's dropping passes like he's Braylon Edwards.  Amazingly, he put together a 5-catch, 93-yard performance in the opener, and with Bryant potentially out, he could approach that again.  I'd be nervous using him, but if Bryant sits, he could make a very good spot starter. Verdict: Sit 'Em in most leagues, Start'Em in deeper leagues with Bryant out.

Sammie Stroughter, Maurice Stovall - These guys were very good college players recently, but I hope you don't have to consider using them as fantasy starters this week.  Once again, move along.

Terrell Owens - So much for opening game fireworks.  T.O. looked visibly frustrated against New England, but they doubled him most of the game.  Expect that to continue, but also expect Alex Van Pelt to find more ways to get him the ball this week.  You don't bring a guy like this in and don't get him the ball.  The fans will be fired up to see him make some big plays, and T.O. will be chomping at the bit.  I have to believe we'll see more crossing patterns and slants with him this week, his bread and butter.  I expect a nice bounce-back week from him, and would have no hesitation starting him if I were crazy enough to own him. Verdict: Start 'Em

Lee Evans - Like Owens, Evans was very quiet on Monday night, finishing with just 3 catches for 25 yards.  And like Owens, Evans also saw a lot of double coverage over the top.  However, when that happens, Evans seems to be effectively shut down.  He still has yet to prove he can be a consistent underneath option, and for some reason, the Bills never utilize him over the middle.  Expect Edwards to try to get it downfield to him more this week, but his inconsistency is too great to count on. Verdict: Sit 'Em

Josh Reed, Roscoe Parrish - Please don't have to start either, please.

Tight Ends
Kellen Winslow - With a gimpy Antonio Bryant, Winslow is the Bucs' No. 1 receiving option. After seeing Ben Watson torch the Bills in the fourth quarter Monday night, I expect Winslow to be targeted early and often by Leftwich.  The Bills will obviously key on him, but he could still be in line for a nice afternoon.  He'll surely get a lot of targets, and maybe receptions. Verdict: Start 'Em

Derek Schouman, Shawn Nelson, Derek Fine - The Bills utilized Schouman and Nelson to the tune of 5 catches for 52 yards and a touchdown on Monday.  Pretty solid production for a unit that in years past hasn't been much more than an afterthought.  The production is directly associated to the double teams Owens and Evans saw.  With that likely to continue, these guys will get some looks. Unfortunately, all three will rotate in and out of the lineup, so it's impossible to predict what any of them will do, and in turn it's impossible to rely on any of them.  Maybe down the line, Nelson will grow into the big-time receiving option we hope he can be, but that time is not now. Verdict: Sit 'Em

Kickers
Mike Nugent - If you're in a 32-team league, I'd say start Nugent.  Otherwise, leave him on the waiver wire.

Rian Lindell - Lindell only averaged six points per game in home games last year, while averaging almost 10 on the road.  I don't know if that's significant, but it is worth noting. I only consider starting kickers who put up consistent numbers and/or play for consistently good offenses.  I'd avoid Lindell until the Bills prove that they're legit. Verdict: Sit 'Em

Defense/Special Teams
Both teams' defenses gave up a ton of yards last week, and only had one sack of the opposing quarterback.  Neither pass rush is expected to consistently pressure quarterbacks, and right now, neither defense looks all that opportunistic.  There are much better options available, and I'd consider one week fill-ins like Washington (vs STL) or Atlanta (vs CAR) before either the Bucs or Bills defense.

Sleepers
Michael Clayton - I mentioned Clayton could be a nice option with Bryant out.  He earns my sleeper label for that.

Bills D/ST - After talking about how I wouldn't start them, this might seem odd, but they look like a solid sleeper option this week.  With a fired up home crowd behind them and a slow-footed, windmill wind-up Leftwich susceptible to turnovers/sacks, they could put up some nice fantasy stats this weekend.  Leodis McKelvin will also be hunting for a big return to make up for Monday's mistake.

*****

Hope this can be of some help to at least a few of you out there.  Please use this as your end of the week fantasy open thread.  Good luck to everyone once again this week.

0 recs  |  Comment 64 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Question:

Who should I start as my 3rd RB? I have Gore and Jamal Lewis penciled in as starters, but out of Ricky Williams, Julius Jones and Micheal Bush, who should get the nod as the 3rd guy?

No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.

by sireric on Sep 18, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No, I’d go with Bush.

Jones had 117 yards and a TD last week, but 62 of those yards and the TD came off one run. Not exactly something you can count on happening week-in, week-out. Not to mention he played St. Louis last week and plays against a much tougher San Francisco D this week that only allowed 40 yards on 17 attempts last week (albeit against the Cardinals).

Bush, on the other hand, is splitting carries with McFadden and is likely to get more red zone touches. And he’s playing a Kansas City defense that gave up ~200 yards rushing last week and nearly 500 total yards to the Ravens, who aren’t exactly known for the offensive prowess.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would also go with Bush

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Sep 18, 2009 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

3rd

I would go with Julius Jones. I started him last week and it paid off. He is going against a better Defense this week but should still get touches and yards.

Why not Bobby April?

by nickdaniels on Sep 18, 2009 9:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I started Trent over Aaron Rodgers this week because of the favorable matchup. Maybe I’ll look like an idiot… or a genius!

I started Lee Evans over Donald Driver. I am expecting fireworks. Raheem Morris, the old DB coach, has his work cut out for him this week.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 18, 2009 9:57 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

… you have two QB/WR combos? I HATE having that on a fantasy roster.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Sep 18, 2009 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HAHA.

I like it, generally. But Driver was my last WR pick and Trent/Lee isn’t a big combo sinec the only week both would be playing is when Rodgers had his bye. Just goes to show ya…

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 18, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which 2 rb's should i start?

Thomas Jones @ NE
Brian Westbrook vs NO
LaDanian Tomlinson vs BAL
Fred Jackson vs TB

Thanks for the help in advance.

by dragonwag0n on Sep 18, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I’d go Jackson and Westbrook.

No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.

by sireric on Sep 18, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

1 million percent, go Jones and Westbrook. You should know that Jones is not on the road, he’s at home, and NE’s defense is pretty awful. If Freddie can rip them apart, so can Jones. New Orleans’ defense is terrible, and with McNabb out, they’re going to give the ball to Westbrook a lot. I’d be far more nervous about Westbrook than Jones, so I’d consider sitting him on favor of Freddie, but ultimately wouldn’t do so.

Tomlinson shouldn’t even be an option.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Sep 18, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree with Eric. Kinda disagree with Brian (especially his hyperbolic 1,000,000% – we don’t broadcast in 1,000,080p do we?)

LT’s likely a game-decision and those always screw fantasy owners. Even if he starts, he’s not 100% and he’s playing the Ravens.

Head was essentially the Bills entire offense last week, and while I hope the Bills involve Evans and TO a lot more this week, Fred will still get a ton of touches both as a runner and a receiver. I’d def. start him.

Thomas Jones vs Westbrook is an interesting one. T. Jones looked like crap last week until late in the game where some garbage time carries got him over 100 yards and a TD. Westbrook didn’t get a ton of reps last week because of the blow out. Now, T. Jones faces a Pats D that looks much weaker than recent years and Westbrook faces the notoriously weak Saints D. Both players will be playing behind green QBs in Sanchez and Kolb respectively, and their offenses are going to be quite one-dimensional. Ultimately, I think the Eagles will end up leaning heavily on Westbrook. In the Pats-Jets game, Hoody is likely to throw 8 to 9 guys in the box and some crazy looks at Sanchez to confuse the crap out of him.

If it were me, I’d rather start Westbrook who’s going to get 85-90% of the carries over T.Jones who’s going to split with Leon Washington. Plus, even tho there is obvious chinks in the Pats Defenses armor, I’d still rather have a guy playing a Gregggg Williams’ led defense than a Hoody-led defense.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jones broke two big runs in the fourth quarter. one of 35 and another for 38 plus the TD. before that he had like 14 yards a TD and a fumble. Leon Washington got more carries.

No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.

by sireric on Sep 18, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

before that he had like 14 yards a TD and a fumble

Exactly. Jones ended the game with more carries (20 to Leon’s 15), but Leon also had 4 catches to TJ’s none.

And if the Jets watch any tape from Monday night’s game, you can bet your bottom dollar they’re gonna run a ton of screens to Leon.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i tend to agree

But not fully…

Westbrook is a no-brainer to me. He’s going to be used heavily to take pressure off Kolb. I bet he sees a lot of catches too, if those mean anything in your league.

I’d probably go Jones I guess, but not if you get pts for receptions. Both should see about 15-20 carries, and I think Jones is more likely to score, but Freddie has a big edge in the receiving game. Actually, I’d probably go Jackson because he gets all the touches and will accrue a lot of total yards…

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Sep 18, 2009 12:39 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

again, thanks for the input guys. Ultimately it comes down to Jones/Jackson. Ive seen them both on “start ’em” blogs on the internet, so I dont think that either option is negative.

Would it be safe to start Buffalo’s Defense this week? They’re available as a FA this week, and im not sure if they are better than my starting defense, Dallas at home vs the Giants.

by dragonwag0n on Sep 18, 2009 4:22 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I think it’s pretty much a wash. Neither team is gonna get a ton of sacks or turnovers, and they’re both likely to give up 17-24 points. The one x-factor could be the Bills special teams. The fan in me thinks they’ve got a shot at a special teams TD this week, but the realist in me remembers that last week’s special teams wasn’t that good.

If you get points (lose points) based on yards allowed, I’d stick with the Cowboys D. If you don’t, flip a coin. If it was me, I’d probably stick with the Cowboys.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK

So in our league, we have to start 1 WR & 1 RB with basically 2 flexes. I have:
At RB – Forte, McFadden, Rice, Caddy Williams, & M. Barber
At WR – C. Johnson, T.O. & E. Royal
Right now I have McFadden, M. Barber, C. Johnson & T.O penciled in. Typically I go with my studs, but the matchups are pulling me the other way. What do you think?

by billskk69 on Sep 18, 2009 1:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

PPR league?

I always favor RB’s for flex positions. You have great RB depth, and I’d consider going with 3 of them instead of using TO. I’d probably go Forte, McFadden and Rice/ Barber as a toss up.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Sep 18, 2009 1:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Just about to post the exact same thing. I’d take Rice – Barber’s got NYG this week, and they look scary.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You might consider C. Williams. I know, I know, it’s heresy to go against the Bills but look at it this way. Our run defense isn’t better than the Giants (Rice) or Steelers (Forte). After a couple of injury plagued seasons, Williams looked like he was back last week against Dallas. And as an added bonus, starting Caddy is a win-win as a fan. Either he sucks and the Bills benefit, or he rips the Bills and you benefit as a fantasy player. Kind of like the land-jostling those Scottish nobles were doing in Braveheart.

by Dyl on Sep 18, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rice gets SD this week, not the Giants. San Diego gave up 150 yards on the ground to the Raiders last week, so I’m sticking with Rice.

If you wanted to start Cadillac in place of Forte, I wouldn’t be completely against it, especially considering it appears Cutler is incapable of checking down to Forte. But, Forte is getting the workload. There’s nobody else. Cadillac is fighting for touches with Ward and Graham (to a lesser extent). And, the Bills run D has looked surprisingly good thus far.

So, if its me, I’m sticking with Rice and Forte. But, I can see the argument for C. Williams over Forte.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well said.

by Dyl on Sep 18, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. Maybe it’s a bit of homerism, but I almost hate to sit T.O. I have a feeling he is going to go off this week. But still, when you factor in touches vs. receptions, plus the fact RB’s also get receptions there are just more opportunities for RB’s to get points. I appreciate the help. I think I will go Forte,Rice, McFadden. I agree with thatguy34 on both the timeshare in TB and our run D has looked pretty good based on last week. I basically picked up Williams as future trade bait & so no one else could use him against me. :)

by billskk69 on Sep 19, 2009 7:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No it’s just a standard league. I normally favor the 3 RB set as well.
I hate to sit Forte as he was my #1 pick, but with them playing Pittsburgh…
I do have good RB depth, but that just makes deciding harder. Plus my QB’s stink as a result as I held out & kept picking RB’s. My best QB is McNabb…Ugh.

by billskk69 on Sep 18, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s try this again.

I have traded L. Tomlinson for Ochocinco and Cotchery.

P. Manning at QB
Fred Jackson at RB
Willie Parker at RB/WR @Chicago (Option 1)
Wes Welker at WR
Jerrico Cotchery at WR
Todd Heap at WR/TE
Jason Witten at TE
Eagles D/ST
Rob Bironas at K

Bench
QB M. Hasselback
RB R. Bush
RB D. Sproles (Option 2) vs. Baltimore
WR B. Berrian (Option 3) @ Detroit
WR S. Moss
WR C. Ochocinco (Option 4) @ Green Bay

I’ve got Willie Parker starting right now, but he didn’t do squat last week, and all indications from the fantasy experts seem to advise benching him. However, I don’t think Moss or Bush would be wise (I don’t get points for returns) — but that still leaves four others. Who should I go with this week? Parker, Sproles, Berrian, or Ochocinco?

Berrian didn’t produce a single stat last week. I’m hesitant to start someone in week 2 who isn’t even on the box score yet this season. Especially in a run-first offense like Minnesota with Harvin and Shiancoe taking some of the load through the air. Ochocinco’s playing at the Packers, that’s not encouraging, and Sproles is at home against the Ravens. Eek. Not many good options for taking out Willie Parker abound.

Also, Michael Bush and Devery Henderson are free agents, would either of those players be better having around than Santana Moss? Thanks for the input.

by Dyl on Sep 18, 2009 1:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sproles and I don’t think its close. He’ll get most of the carries this week with LT likely to sit. He’s big in their passing and return games too.

I’d also have Ocho and Moss in ahead of Cotchery and Heap.

Why did you dump LT so quickly? That’s a pretty poor trade, IMO, but that might be me. Relying on Jackson, Parker and Bush for the rest of the year sounds like a bad idea to me.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Sep 18, 2009 1:59 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Was in the process of responding…K beat me to it again…but I have a bit of different view point…give me a minute.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Alright. Those are some interesting choices ya got there. I very much may be in the minority here (and perhaps K can come along and provide an alternate view point), but this is what I’m doing with that roster…

I’m benching Willie Parker for Sproles. Parker plays Chicago, Sproles plays Baltimore. Both have tough matchups, but Sproles looked excellent last week. Parker, not so much.

Here’s where things might get crazy. I would start Santana Moss this week. Moss is playing St. Louis, at home. The Rams were torched last week. The Redskins should easily exploit the Rams D.

I don’t like Cotchery’s matchup at all, but, he is the #1 WR on that team, so I’m starting him over Heap. WR > TE. I agree with your thoughts about Berrian. Given that he’s got a new QB (with a very old arm and gray beard), I’d like to see some production before I buy in.

I disagree with K on Ocho. I don’t trust Carson Palmer, and Charles Woodson, well he’s pretty good. But, I agree with him on that trade. You didn’t get enough for LT (and you probably won’t get equal value), so I woulda help onto him for another few weeks.

So recap…Sproles over Parker. Moss and Cotchery over Cotchery and Heap. And I’d hold off on Bush and Henderson. I don’t see anyone on your team I’d drop over them.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

so I woulda help onto him for another few weeks.

held. Not help.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the rationale on Sproles from you and K, but aren’t yet convinced on Moss over Heap. Heap’s one of the top 5 TEs in the league, he’s got to be one of the top options on the Ravens, and now with Flacco flinging it a lot more, wouldn’t he be an automatic start?

by Dyl on Sep 18, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heap hasn’t been a top 5 TE in years. He put up nice numbers against the feeble Chiefs last week. SD is a much tougher matchup, although Zach Miller got them pretty good last week. I would never want to rely on Heap though and favor WR’s over TE’s any day. Moss has an excellent matchup.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Sep 18, 2009 2:17 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right, it has been a little while since he was an elite player. I feel old. Oh, I managed to snatch up the Packers D/ST, looks like I had an extra slot. Eagles D faces NO, while Packers have Cincy. Whew, that was close!

by Dyl on Sep 18, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wanna be in your league where Green Bay’s D/ST were still available…

by dragonwag0n on Sep 18, 2009 4:45 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

It was either theirs or the Falcons D that I could have taken, I think Green Bay’s was a bit better. I have a hunch they’re going to really step it up this year.

by Dyl on Sep 18, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like Heap as a TE. But, I wouldn’t call him a top 5 TE in the league. Yeah, he had 2 TDs last week, but that’s not going to be an ongoing occurrence. Again, I like Heap, and I like his matchup. But I like Moss’s matchup and he’s a WR. WR > TE.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Parker plays Chicago, Sproles plays Baltimore. Both have tough matchups, but Sproles looked excellent last week. Parker, not so much.

Don’t forget that Urlacher is done for the year, That is a huge hole in the middle of the defense. The bigger problem for Parker is his frailty. The Steelers know it and give a lot of his carries to Mendenhall.

No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.

by sireric on Sep 18, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t forget that Urlacher is done for the year, That is a huge hole in the middle of the defense.

True, but Urlacher left the game in the 3rd quarter and the running didn’t get much easier for GB. The loss of Urlacher will be felt more in the pass game than the run game. I’m still sticking with Sproles. Parker doesn’t seem like the same player he once was. The Steelers have him 13 carries last week. Moore and Mendenhall combined for 9.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

True enough, although it was Mendenhall who sustained the season-ending shoulder injury last year. But to counter my own argument, shoulder injuries don’t happen like hamstrings do. They don’t tend(on) to happen. Haha. Ouch, bad joke.

by Dyl on Sep 18, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In hindsight, I should have kept LT at least for another week. I needed WR like the desert needed the rain, since I’d only picked up Todd Heap yesterday, and someone offered Ocho and Cotchery for him, so I pulled the trigger. For perspective, Santana Moss and Berrian got me 1 point combined in week 1. 1 point. Was Moss tanking? Was Berrian giving way to Harvin and Adrian Peterson? I panicked. If I hadn’t had the Eagles D (41!!!!) I’d be 0-1.

by Dyl on Sep 18, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Moss is usually boom or bust. The Giants focused on taking the deep ball away so Moss was done-zo. This week, the Rams aren’t going to be taking away anything.

Berrian’s been injured and hasn’t gotten a chance to practice much with Favre. I think he’ll come around once he and Favre get on the same page. But like I said above, I’d wait to see it first.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You definitely panicked and that’s being kind!!!

Personally, I’d have tried dumping Bush or Parker for one WR instead. In fact, maybe you could have sold high on Freddie.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Sep 18, 2009 2:23 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Personally, I wouldn’t have made any moves at all. It’s far too early in the season to be making snap judgments on players. Yeah, Moss and Berrian laid eggs and nobody knows what LT has left. But, you drafted these players for a reason – one week shouldn’t sway your opinion of a player that much.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No more fantasy questions? Come on everyone. Its this or more work.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 3:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Should I start Ronnie Brown or LenDale White as my FLEX option?

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Sep 18, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LenDale White – 1 million percent :-)

If you take out his ridiculous 5 TD game last year, Ronnie Brown had 803 yards and 6 TDs. All season. And Indy’s D wasn’t its usual horrible self last week – they actually kept The High Life under 100 yards.

Meanwhile, LenDale and Tennessee get a Houston team that was gauged for 190 yards last week…and they were trying to stack the box against the run! I’d go with LenDale. He’s got a better match-up and he’ll get red zone touches.

And thanks for obliging my request to stay away from actual work. =)

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ha – no problem. LenDale’s been in my lineup since early Tuesday morning, I was just throwing you a bone. :)

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Sep 18, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I figured and it’s certainly appreciated.

So easy Marshawn Lynch can do it.

by thatguy34 on Sep 18, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My running backs were awful last week. Who should I start?

Michael Turner against Carolina?
Brandon Jacobs against Dallas?
Steve Slayton against Tennessee?
Willie Parker against Chicago?

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 19, 2009 8:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I can start two of them. Fleaflicker.

.1 point per yard

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 19, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In my humble opinion, I would say start Michael Turner and Willie Parker. Definitely Michael Turner but I’m kind of torn between the others. Slayton I would say no because he’s playing against Tennessee, and that’s never a good thing. Jacobs is also playing against a stout defense. Even though I think Slayton and Jacobs are better than him, Willie Parker is going against an average defense at best in Chicago made even worse by the loss of Urlacher. But who knows?

by tpsabres on Sep 19, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How is Dallas’ defense stout, while Chicago is average? Tampa ran all over Dallas last week. Ward and Cadillac combined for 159 yards and 2 TDs on 25 carries. Grant and Wynn only ran for 69 yards and 1 TD on 19 carries. Cutler threw 4 picks and Chicago’s D still only gave up 21 points to a great offense. Dallas let a pretty mediocre TB unit score the exact same amount.

I’d start Turner and Jacobs.

by kaisertown on Sep 19, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah that’s who I have starting. With that being said, both were awful last week.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 19, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it’s only been one week. They both had great preseasons too. I’d be surprised if Turner and Jacobs don’t end with at least 80 yards and a TD each. I think they’re both much more likley to go off with huge days than your other guys too.

by kaisertown on Sep 19, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trent Edwards vs Joe Flacco

I have Donovan Mcnabb, but he is injured so I don’t know if I should start Trent Edwards or Joe Flacco. I’ve got Trent starting now because Buc Wild was saying the Bucs pass defense is pretty bad. Any chance Flacco can come anywhere close to what he did last week?

by tpsabres on Sep 19, 2009 10:31 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Go Edwards. The Bucs absolutely stink on defense. Flacco is playing a pretty good pass rush in San Diego. In fact, I’d take Edwards every day of the week and twice on Sundays in this scenario.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 19, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A guy in my league drafted Steve Slayton 14th overall. Then cut him after his lousy week 1 performance. I replaced Rashard Mendenhall on my roster with Steve Slayton. I think it’s a pretty good move. :-)

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 19, 2009 12:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What a dummy!

Who did he even pick up?

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Sep 19, 2009 11:17 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Mike Bell from NO.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 20, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One last one I can't decide on

Percy Harvin vs Det
Lee Evans vs TB

I keep wanting to put Evans in, but its hard for me to see Detroit and not pick againt them. Any advice?

by dragonwag0n on Sep 19, 2009 1:48 PM EDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

That a great situation to have because I think both are going to have good games. I never trust rookie WRs and don’t draft them and therefore I go with Evans, who I started this week over Donal Driver.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 19, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Harvin. Never rely on Evans even up against a rook…

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Sep 19, 2009 11:16 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Lee Evans, as K said, showed last year that he can’t be counted on as a fantasy WR. Evans would go stretches with almost no catches. He might go off for 9 and 101 with 2, but he might catch 1 for 11. Percy Harvin, however, strikes me as someone who Favre is going to target. Harvin’s only a rookie, but look how he kept Shiancoe’s numbers down and Berrian completely off the boxscore last week. I vote Harvin.

by Dyl on Sep 20, 2009 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.

by sireric on Sep 20, 2009 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He had one catch today… it was worth some good points but only one catch. 9.2 points on fleaflicker. Donald Driver was on my bench and did better for me than Lee did but I am OK. I am down by 16.3 points going into Sunday night and my kicker (Folk), RB (Jacons), and WR (Roy Williams) are yet to play. We should be able to pull out a vistory between those three guys.

Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.

by MattRichWarren on Sep 20, 2009 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Bills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Billsjaguars_small
On Mike Shanahan and Gary Kubiak
Hamstergolfhd4_small
3 Things We Need to Know: Weeks 5-10
Dib_small
Bills fans, I'm coming for you...
Bills_small
Release of Hamdan
Picture_2_small
Two possible father/son combos
Images_small
The Remaining Games
Sst1_small
Jacksonville weekend
Bills_small
Strong Kudos to Ralph Wilson
Bills_small
Reflecting On the Edwards Era
Daffy_duck_small
And away we go! (Thurman Thomas quotes)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Editor-in-Chief

Ronswanson_small Brian Galliford

Editors

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Billsjaguars_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Dynamics_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Nfl-toronto_small kaisertown